Author:
Janapareddy
Rajesh1, Srijan Samanta1 and Sanjoy Kumar Bordolui2*
Journal Name: International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 18(1): 10-16, 2026
Address:
1Research Scholar, Department of Seed Science and
Technology,
Bidhan
Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia (West Bengal), India.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Seed Science and
Technology,
Bidhan
Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia (West Bengal), India.
(Corresponding
author: Sanjoy Kumar Bordolui* sanjoy_bordolui@rediffmail.com)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/IJTAS.2026.18.1.2
The development of effective,
affordable, and ecologically friendly methods to increase seed vigour is
crucial because seed resilience and performance are fundamental to sustainable
agriculture. In order to enhance the physiological and biochemical characteristics
of seeds, a promising pre-sowing method known as “seed priming” entails
subjecting them to particular organic or inorganic compounds under carefully
monitored circumstances. Nutri-priming is the process of soaking seeds in a
nutrient solution to improve their growth and stress tolerance. It combines
seed priming with the application of macro and micronutrients, resulting in
increased nutrient content in the final crop, improved seedling vigour, and
faster and more uniform germination. This approach, which has been successfully
used in cereal crops to lessen the negative effects of environmental stressors,
is both economical and environmentally friendly, making it a valuable strategy
for increasing agricultural productivity. In light of the aforementioned, the
current study used standardised physiological and germination metrics to assess
the impact of nutri-priming on early seedling vigour and germination dynamics
in rice. From banana stems, the various priming treatments were extracted. The
extracted materials were prepared in various concentrations using the following
methods: 0.25 mL (T1), 0.50 mL (T2), 1.00 mL (T3),
2.00 mL (T4), 3.00 mL (T5), and 4.00 mL (T6),
diluted in 15 mL distilled water; for the control (T0) only 15 mL
distilled water was used. In rice, 1.00 mL (T3) was the ideal
concentration for enhancing germination behaviour, early seedling vigour, and a
shorter mean germination time. So, 1.00 mL banana stem extracted nurti-priming
increases biomass accumulation, maximises metabolic activation, and encourages
elongation growth without causing toxic or osmotic stress.
Nutri-priming, rice, germination energy, germination index, vigour
Uniform and rapid seedling establishment is the backbone for achieving optimal crop yield, as early vigor strongly ensures competitive ability, resource acquisition, and stand uniformity. Poor and erratic emergences concomitated with low-vigor seedlings exacerbate irregular canopy growth, induce weed proliferations (Farooq et al., 2019), and subsequent yield penalties. Seed priming is a robust pre-sowing strategy that fosters germination uniformity, seedling vigor, and early plant establishment through the regulation of pre-germinative metabolic activity without permitting radicle protrusions (Samanta et al., 2025; Singh et al., 2015). Within this framework, nutrient-based seed priming (nutri-priming) provides an additional functional advantage as it supplements macro- or micronutrients during imbibition to bolster cellular metabolism, enzyme activation, and antioxidative regulation. These mechanisms collectively enhance germination energy, shorten mean germination time (MGT), enhance root–shoot growth, and improve vigour indices—attributes essential for strong crop establishment (Nciizah et al., 2020). This approach is particularly relevant where early nutrient limitations often delay fifty percent germination (T50), stunt root development, and suppresses early growth (Choudhury and Bordolui 2022a).
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) remains to be the most significant cereal in the world, accounting for more than 20% of the world’s total caloric intake and being the major staple in Asia, Africa, and Latin America (FAO, 2025). Despite the importance, rice frequently suffer from poor field emergence, especially under suboptimal moisture, marginal soils, and nutrient-deficient conditions—constraints that directly impede germination potential and compromise early seedling vigour (Bordolui et al., 2018). Understanding how nutri-priming modifies different parameters can offer deep insight into its physiological modes of action and identifying scalable, crop-appropriate priming formulations. For instance, changes in MGT and T50 reflect alterations in the speed and synchronicity of germination; increases in vigor indices indicate enhanced early growth potential; and alterations in root-to-shoot ratio may reflect shifts in resource allocation induced by priming.
Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the influence of nutri-priming on germination dynamics and early seedling vigour in rice using a standardized physiological and germination metrics. By juxtaposing responses in rice, this study seeks to identify the concentration of nutri-priming that capable of influencing germination dynamics, seedling vigour, and strengthen early establishment thereby offering practical insights for scalable production enhancement strategies.
Rice seeds (variety Bidhan Suruchi) were collected from the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, BCKV. Seeds were surface sterilized with 0.2% mercuric chloride solution for 2 to 3 minutes, followed by thorough rinsing with deionized water. Nutri-priming materials were extracted from banana stems by digestion. The different concentrations were prepared using the following methods: 0.25 mL (T1), 0.50 mL (T2), 1.00 mL (T3), 2.00 mL (T4), 3.00 mL (T5), and 4.00 mL (T6), of extracted materials diluted in 15 mL of distilled water, while 15 millilitres of distilled water were used for the control (no extracted material was used for T0). Seeds were soaked in different concentrations of priming material for eight hours in order to prime them. To evaluate the germination-related parameters and seedling vigour, primed seeds were shade-dried to their initial moisture content and then put in petri dishes and roll towels. All tests were conducted under a completely randomized design (CRD) with four replications in the Seed Science and Technology Laboratory, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya.
Enumeration of Germination metrices
Germination parameters, including germination potential (GP), time to 50% germination (T50), germination energy (GE), germination index (GI), and mean germination time (MGT), were calculated using standard equations (Table 1).
Table 1: Equations used to determine selected germination matrices.
Sr. No. | Parameters | Equation | Reference |
1 | Germination potential (%) | GP = Number of normal germinated seeds/ Total number of seeds) x 100 | ISTA, 1996 |
2 | Time to 50% germination (T50) | T50 = ti + [{(N / 2 – ni) × (tj – ti)} / (nj – ni)] Where ‘N’= the final number of seeds that germinated, and ‘ni’, ‘nj’ are the total number of seeds germinated by adjacent counts at times ‘ti’ and ‘tj’ when ni< N/2 <nj. | Coolbear et al., 1984; Farooq et al., 2005 |
3 | Germination Energy (GE) | Percent of seeds germinated on 4th day after the initiation of the experiment, in relation to the total number of seeds tested | Ruan et al., 2002 |
4 | Germination Index (GI) | GI = Σ (ni / di), for i = 1 to k | AOSA, 1983 |
5 | Mean Germination time (MGT) | MGT = Σ (ni × di) / Σni, for i = 1 to k | Ellis and Roberts, 1981 |
Where ‘ni’ is the number of seeds that emerged on day “di” and “d” is the number of days counted from the start of the test, k is the day of final count (14 days). | |||
Seedling Parameters
Root and shoot lengths of ten randomly selected seedlings were measured on the 14th day after test initiation using a ruler and graph paper. The average values were used to calculate the root-to-shoot ratio. Seedling length (cm) was obtained by summing root and shoot lengths.
Fresh and dry weights of seedlings were measured using a digital balance. For dry weight determination, seedlings were oven-dried at 110 ± 20C for 24 hours. Both fresh and dry weights were expressed as mg seedling-1.
Seedling vigor indices were computed according to Abdul-Baki and Anderson (1973):
SVI-I = Germination (%) × Average seedling length (cm)
SVI-II = Germination (%) × Average seedling dry weight (mg)
The impact of various treatment concentrations on germination metrics shows distinct variations in seed performance. Overall, the data demonstrate that while excessively high concentrations (T6: 4.00 mL) adversely affected certain parameters, moderate concentrations (especially T3: 1.00 mL) significantly improved seed germination characteristics when compared to the control.
Germination Potential:
The germination potential varied from 95.15% (T0) to 99.17% (T3). The highest values were recorded by T3 and T4, both of which were statistically better than the other treatments. This suggests that concentrations between 1.00 and 2.00 mL maximise the early germination response. Though not to the same degree, lower concentrations (T1 and T2) also increased germination potential in comparison to the control. The decline in T6 indicates that higher doses may begin to exert inhibitory or stressful effects on seeds (Fig. 1). According to Chakraborty and Bordolui (2021), priming green gram with GA3 and Ag-Nanoparticles increases the germination rate. Ray et al. (2023) reported a similar outcome in tomatoes.
Time to 50% Germination (T₅₀):
Up to T3, T50 exhibited a declining trend; at higher concentrations, it slightly increased (Fig. 1). T3 showed the fastest germination (1.74 days), suggesting early emergence and increased vigour. Germination was delayed by treatments exceeding 1.00 mL, especially T6 at 3.26 days, suggesting potential concentration-dependent inhibitory effects. Higher concentrations may slow down germination, as demonstrated by T6's slowest germination time. Choudhury et al. (2023) discovered that PEG 6000 priming decreases chickpea time of 50% germination.
(a) | (b) |
(c) | (d) |
(e) | |
Fig. 1. Effect of Nutri-priming on (a) Germination (%), (b) Time to 50% germination (days), (c) Germination energy (%), (d) Germination index, (e) Mean Germination Time (days) in Rice (Oryza sativa L., cv. Bidhan Suruchi).
Germination Energy
The application of treatment resulted in a significant increase in germination energy (Fig. 1). The highest values (79.00–79.22%) were obtained by T3 and T4, indicating higher early seed vigour. While intermediate treatments (T1, T2, T5, and T6) produced moderate improvements, the control group had the lowest energy (74.67%). Once more, T3 is clearly the best course of action. Similar findings were reported in rice by Dandapat and Bordolui (2025).
Germination Index
The pattern of the germination index was comparable to that of other vigour characteristics. The highest germination index values were recorded in T3 (35.29) and T4 (34.82), confirming improved speed and uniformity of germination (Fig. 1). Reduced vigour at high concentrations is suggested by T6's lower germination index (28.41). The control had the lowest germination index, indicating that treatments improved germination performance. Choudhury et al. (2023) reported similar results in chickpea.
Mean Germination Time (MGT)
A lower mean germination time denotes more rapid and consistent germination. Mean germination time was lowest in T3 (3.05 days), followed by T4 (3.23 days). Slower germination was confirmed by higher mean germination time values in T6 (4.11 days) and the control (3.94 days). MGT was moderately reduced by treatments T1, T2, and T5 (Fig. 1). For rice, Dandapat and Bordolui (2025) reported similar findings.
Root to Shoot Length Ratio
The root-to-shoot ratio varied between 1.16 and 1.71 (Fig. 2). The highest ratio was recorded in T4 (2.00 mL/15 mL), closely followed by T3 (1.57). T0, T1, T5, and T6 showed statistically similar but significantly lower ratios. In T3 and T4, a higher root-to-shoot ratio indicates improved root development in relation to shoot length, suggesting better adaptation for nutrient and water uptake during early seedling establishment.
Seedling Length
Priming resulted in a significant increase in seedling length, which ranged from 19.35 cm (T0) to 28.86 cm (T3). The tallest seedlings were produced by T3 and T4 (27.40 cm), both of which were significantly better than all other treatments. Higher concentrations (T5 and T6) resulted in shorter seedlings, suggesting that high priming doses may inhibit elongation. Thus, by encouraging elongation growth, optimal priming (1.00–2.00 mL) successfully increased early seedling vigour (Fig. 2). Choudhury and Bordolui (2022b) found comparable outcomes in Bengal gram using Potassium Nitrate priming to lengthen shoots.
Seedling Fresh Weight
The fresh weight of average seedling ranged from 36.34 mg to 39.17 mg. The highest fresh weight was recorded by T3, closely followed by T2 and T4. The lowest values were found in T0 and T6, suggesting either excessive concentration or limited biomass accumulation without priming. Improved metabolic activity and water absorption efficiency during germination are reflected in increased fresh weight in moderately primed seeds (Fig. 2). Similar results were found in tomato by Ray and Bordolui (2022a).
Seedling Dry Weight
Seed priming significantly improved the dry weight of average seedlings, which ranged from 6.10 mg to 7.55 mg. Both statistically superior treatments, T4 (7.55 mg) and T3 (7.47 mg), had the highest dry weights. Reduced reserve mobilisation or poor growth under unfavourable circumstances are suggested by lower dry weight in T6 and T0. Increased conversion of seed reserves into structural biomass is indicated by higher dry matter accumulation in optimally primed seeds (Fig. 2). In carrots, Kundu and Bordolui (2025) discovered a comparable outcome following osmo-priming.
Vigour Index I
The strongest reaction to priming was seen in Vigour Index I (Fig. 2). The values varied between 1841.29 (T0) and 2862.15 (T3). T3 showed the most vigour, followed by T4, suggesting better growth and establishment potential. Significant decreases were observed at higher concentrations (T5 and T6), almost reaching control levels. Vigour index-I makes it abundantly evident that a priming solution of 1.00 to 2.00 mL produces better early vigour. Chakraborty et al. (2020); Ray and Bordolui (2022b) reported similar results.
Vigour Index II
Vigour Index II increased significantly with priming, much like Vigour Index I. The highest value was obtained in T4 (747.69), statistically comparable to T3 (740.87). The control (595.51) and T6 (585.64) had the lowest values. This demonstrates that moderate priming produces stronger, heavier seedlings in addition to improving germination (Fig. 2). In contrast to other treatments, Chakraborty and Bordolui (2021) discovered that Ag nano priming raised the fresh weight of green gram seedlings. In the case of carrots, Kundu and Bordolui (2023) observed similar results.
All the parameters were further supported by the correlogram (Fig. 3), which showed strong positive correlations (r>0.75) between germination potential, germination energy, germination, root to shoot ratio, shoot length, root length, and vigour index I and II. These correlations formed a coherent cluster that suggested coordinated germination and vigour. Time to 50% germination and mean germination time demonstrated a negative correlation with germination, highlighting its function as vigour.
The analyses highlighted the different trait relationships under nutri-priming and emphasised the vital role that seed vigour and germination play in maintaining physiological activity.
(a) | (b) |
(c) |
(d) |
(e) | (f) |
Fig. 2. Effect of Nutri-priming on (a) Root to shoot length ratio, (b) Seedling length (cm), (c) Seedling fresh weight (mg seedling-1), (d) Seedling dry weight (mg seedling-1), (e) Vigour index I, (f) Vigour index II in Rice (Oryza sativa L., cv. Bidhan Suruchi).
Fig. 3. Pearson correlation matrix depicting pairwise correlation coefficients (r) for GP (Germination Potential), T50 (Time to 50% Germination), GE (Germination Energy), GI (Germination Index), MGT (Mean Germination Time), RSR (Root–Shoot length Ratio), SL (Seedling Length), SFW (Seedling Fresh Weight), SDW (Seedling Dry Weight), VI-I and VI-II (Vigour Index I and II). Blue cells indicate positive correlations, red cells indicate negative correlations, and colour intensity reflects the magnitude of r. Significance levels are denoted as p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), and p < 0.001 (***).
The findings show that when treatment is applied at optimal concentrations, it greatly improves seed germination characteristics. Highest germination potential, greatest germination energy, fastest germination, highest vigour, and lowest mean germination time were all consistently demonstrated by T3 (1.00 mL) in comparison to all other treatments. Among the parameters root shoot ratio, seedling length, fresh and dry weight, and vigour index T3 (1.00 mL) and T4 (2.00 mL) consistently produced the best performance. By increasing elongation growth, biomass production, and metabolic efficiency, these treatments promoted superior seedling vigour. On the other hand, most traits decreased with high concentrations of priming (T5 and T6), suggesting possible osmotic stress or biochemical inhibition at higher concentrations. Higher concentrations (T6), on the other hand, decreased seed performance, suggesting possible toxicity or osmotic stress at high concentrations. This implies that the treatment's positive effects are dose-dependent, with moderate dosages encouraging seed vigour and excessive application having negative effects. Therefore, the best treatment for improving early seedling growth and vigour in rice cv Bidhan Suruchi as well as overall germination behaviour is 1.00 mL.
To understand the physiological mechanisms underlying increased metabolic activity, antioxidant balance, and nutrient assimilation during early germination, detailed biochemical and molecular analyses are required. Furthermore, standardising extraction protocols, assessing storage stability, and conducting economic feasibility studies will help farmers commercialise and adopt these technologies. Comparative evaluation with other organic byproducts, as well as integration with complementary priming approaches, may help to refine sustainable and environmentally friendly rice seed enhancement strategies.
AOSA (1983). Association of Official Seed Analysts. Seed vigour testing handbook. Contribution No. 32 to the handbook on seed testing.
Bordolui, S. K., Chattopadhyay, P. and Basu, A. K. (2018). Evaluation of some small seeded aromatic indigenous genotypes for commercial utilization as high value rice. International Journal of Minor Fruits, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 4(1), 40-43.
Chakraborty, A. and Bordolui, S. K. (2021). Impact of Seed Priming with Ag-Nanoparticle and GA3 on Germination and Vigour in Green gram. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 10(03), 1499-1506.
Chakraborty, A., Bordolui, S. K., Nandi, D. and Mahato, M. K. (2020). Seed Deterioration Pattern of Some China Aster During Storage. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 9(03), 1499-1506.
Choudhury, A. and Bordolui S. K. (2022a). Seed invigoration treatment with sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4) Nutri-priming for improvement of quality performance of Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(12), 3381-3386.
Choudhury, A. and Bordolui S. K. (2022b). Inducement of Seed Priming with Potassium Nitrate on quality Performance of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(4), 779-783
Choudhury, A., Bordolui, S. K. and Ray, J. (2023). Optimizing Priming Concentration and Duration of PEG 6000 for Improving Seed Germination and Vigour in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Environment and Ecology, 43(3C), 1953-1959.
Coolbear, P., Francis, A., and Grierson, D. (1984). The effect of low-temperature pre-sowing treatment on the germination performance and membrane integrity of artificially aged tomato seeds. J. Exp. Bot., 35, 1609-1617.
Dandapat, S. and Bordolui, S. K. (2025). The Effective Use of Phytohormones for Seed Priming: A Successful Method for Improving Germination and Vigour in Rice. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 16(1), 63–67.
Ellis, R. H., and Roberts E. H. (1981). The quantification of aging and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Sci. Technol., 9,373-409.
FAO (2025). World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2025.
Farooq, M., Basra, S. M. A., Hafeez, K. and Ahmad, N. (2005). Thermal hardening: a new seed vigour enhancement tool in rice. J. Integ. Plant Biol., 47, 187-193.
Farooq, M., Usman, M., Nadeem, F., Rehman, H. U., Wahid, A., Basra, S. M., and Siddique, K. H. (2019). Seed priming in field crops: potential benefits, adoption and challenges. Crop and Pasture Science, 70(9), 731-771.
ISTA (1996). https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1531176
Kundu, E. and Bordolui S. K. (2025). Seed Priming with Potassium Nitrate Impacts on Germination and Physiological Performance in Carrot. Archives of Current Research International, 25(6), 220-228.
Kundu, E. and Bordolui, S. K. (2023). Silver Nanoparticles –mediate Seed priming Improves Germination and Physiological Performance in Carrot. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15(10), 1079-1085.
Nciizah, A. D., Rapetsoa, M. C., Wakindiki, I. I., and Zerizghy, M. G. (2020). Micronutrient seed priming improves maize (Zea mays) early seedling growth in a micronutrient deficient soil. Heliyon, 6(8), e04766.
Ray, J. and Bordolui S. K. (2022a). Seed quality deterioration of tomato during storage: effect of storing containers and condition. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(2), 137-142.
Ray, J. and Bordolui S. K. (2022b). Effect of seed treatments and storing period on physiological and biochemical parameters of tomato during storage. Journal of Crop and Weed, 18(2), 230-239.
Ray, J., Bordolui, S. K. and Murmu, K. (2023). Influence of seed priming and foliar application of GA3 on fruit morphology and biochemical composition of tomato in Gangetic Alluvial Zone. Theoretical Biology Forum. 12(2),1-14
Ruan, S., Xue, Q., and Tylkowska, K. (2002). The influence of priming on germination of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds and seedling emergence and performance in flooded soil. Seed Science and Technology, 30(1), 61-67.
Samanta, S., Dutta, A., and Akhtar, J. (2025). Defence priming: a promising approach for sustainable crop protection. Plant Archives, 25(2), 736-745.
Singh, H., Jassal, R. K., Kang, J. S., Sandhu, S.S., Kang, H. and Grewal, K. (2015). Seed priming techniques in field crops- A review. Agricultural Reviews. 36(4), 251-264.
Janapareddy Rajesh, Srijan Samanta and Sanjoy Kumar Bordolui (2026). Impact of Nutri-priming on Germination Dynamics and Early Seedling Vigour in Rice. International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 18(1), 10–16.