Author:
Jasmeena Qadir1*, Tajamul Islam2,
Somagaini Pavankumar3, Ravi Kant4 and Shalini Aryan5
Journal Name: International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 16(1), 93-98, 2024
Address:
1JRF, Division of Silkworm Crop Improvement,
College of Temperate Sericulture, Mirgund, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.
2Lecturer, Government Degree College Sopore, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
3State Department of Sericulture, Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Lakkireddypalli Mandal, Andhra-Pradesh, India.
4Division of Sericulture,
Sher-e-Kashmir
University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, India.
5Department of Agriculture, Mata Gujri College,
Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab, India.
DOI: 10.65041/IJTAS.2024.16.1.20
The
uzi fly, Exorista bombycis (Louis) is
an endoparasitoid causing significant crop losses upto the tune of 20% in the
rainy season followed by 11-15% loss in winter and 1.0 – 3.0% loss in summer
seasons. There is high demand of minimizing the use of
chemicals for pest control in sericulture as a little toxicity may deteriorate
healthy silkworm rearing and ultimately raw silk production. Nesolynx thymus
(Girault) is a serious endo-larval parasitoid and
inundative pupal parasitoid of the order Hymenoptera: Eulophidae. It possess
remarkable biological characteristics of biological control such as short life
span, potential for high parasitization, high host searching ability, docile
for mass production with good adaptability under laboratory as well as field
conditions. The eco-friendly method of using N. thymus for control of Uzi fly promotes sustainable solution and
balance in the environment. N. thymus is the pupal endoparsitoid of almost all
the species of Uzi fly including Blepheripa
zebina, Exorista phillipinensis as well. The industrial production of N. thymus parasitoid is completed in two
processes which involves production of housefly (Musca domestica) pupae and production of N. thymus pupae on
housefly pupae. Many behavioral responses culminate
while oviposition of gravid female of N. thymus to parasitizes (host
pupae), Exorista bombycis. The host factors viz., pupae size, age and period of exposure to parasitoids
influence the biology of parasitoids. The optimization of host factors influencing
the parasitisation by parasitoid may enhance the efficacy of N. thymus and its mass multiplication
and production in control of Uzi fly.
India is the second largest producer of silk and produces all the five known silks (Padaki et al., 2015). Silkworm (Bombyx mori Linn.) is a domesticated insect and reared in mass numbers for the large scale production of mulberry silk (Giora et al., 2022). Many factors are responsible for severe or complete crop losses anually (Rahmathulla, 2012). Among them, the attack of insect and non-insect pests is of prime concern (Haripriya & Mamatha 2023). The mulberry silkworm is affected by a number of insect pests like Uzi fly (Exorista bombycis Louis), earwig, dermestes beetle and ants (Sakthival et al., 2012; Belgumpe and Jadhav 2017). Recently it is learnt that, Uzi fly has also been introduced in various parts of Maharashtra (Jadhav and Sathe, 2016). The uzi fly, Exorista bombycis (Louis) is a larval endoparasitoid. It belongs to order diptera and family tachnidae (Singh et al., 2024). Many species of uzi fly are found to attack silkworms which include Japanese uzi fly (Crossocosmia sericariae Rondani), Hime uzi fly (Ctenophorocera pavida Meigen), Tasar uzi fly (Blepharipa zebina Walker) and the Indian uzi fly (Exorista bombycis Louis) (Sowmya and Ranjitha 2021). Among the pests, Uzi fly (Exorista bombycis) is the most serious pest of silkworm in Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal. It has been reported that uzi fly cause silkworm crop loss upto the tune of 10 to 40 percent (Sakthivel et al., 2012). It causes crop loss of more than 20% in the rainy season followed by 11-15% loss in winter and 1.0 - 3.0% loss in summer seasons (Bari et al., 2023). Uzi fly lays about 250-300 eggs on a single host of silkworm and hatches with an average hatching of 30-40 and within three days eggs hatch (Reddy et al., 2015). It prefers 4th and 5th instar silkworm larva to lay eggs into their intersegmental regions. Upon hatching, maggots bore into the silkworm body. It feeds on silkworm's fluid and leaves a black scar on the insect body. They get nourishment until silkworm's pupal stage and the mature maggots emerge out of the cocoon shell and render the cocoons unreelable (Barsagade, 2017). If 4th stage silkworms are infested with Uzi fly, silkworms do not spin cocoons but when 5th instar silkworms are infested with uzi fly, silkworms spin cocoons but those cocoons are not suitable for silk reeling. The Uzi maggots pupate in the crevices and holes of rearing room (Choudhury et al., 2014).
The use of natural enemy against the pest organism to reduce their densities is the effective method of pest control (DeBach et al., 1971). Natural enemies include parasitoids, predators, entomopathogenic nematodes, pathogens, competing microorganisms without hyperparasites of plant pathogens, herbivores feeding on weeds and weed seeds, competitors for resources and organisms producing toxins, termed antibiosis or allelopathy as they directly or indirectly acts as the pest control with its management (Khandagale et al., 2023). There are a number of hymenopteran parasitoids that can be used in nature to reduce the number of Uzi flies (Siddaiah and Danagoudra 2019; Baruah and Kalita 2020). Several parasitoids have been tested for parasitization against uzi fly pupae, including Nesolynx thymus, Trichopria sp., Exoristobia philippiensis, Dirhinus sp., Brachymeri alugubris, Spalangi aendius, Pachycrepoideus veerannai, and Spilomicrus karnatakensis (Nirmala and Veeranna 1998; Singh and Maheshwari 2002; Singh and Saratchandra 2003) (Table 1). In sericulture, chemical means of pest control may pose serious threat to silkworms, rearers and ecosystem as well (Singh and Saratchandra 2002). There is also high demand of minimizing the use of chemicals for pest control in sericulture as a little toxicity of it may deteriorate healthy silkworm rearing and ultimately raw silk production (Karthik and Rathinamoorthy 2017; Altman and Farrell 2022). The eco-friendly approach not only ensures a sustainable solution but also promotes the overall balance of the ecosystem.
Nesolynx thymus (Girault) is a serious endo-larval parasitoid and inundative pupal parasitoid of the Hymenoptera: Eulophidae. It possess remarkable biological characteristics of biological control such as short life span, potential for high parasitization, high host searching ability, docile for mass production with good adaptability under laboratory as well as field conditions. N. thymus has been regarded as potential biocontrol agent of E. bombycis. N. thymus have been found to control the uzi fly ((Exorista philippinensis and Blepheripa zebina) infesting muga silkworm (Antheraea assamensis Helfer) in sericulture (Choudhury et al., 2014). It is considered as one of the important component of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in sericulture by Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute (CSR & TI), Mysore (Hasan et al., 2009; Gahukar, 2014). It is released on large scale for control the uzi fly infestation. Throughout this article, the significance of biological control agent, Nesolynx thymus and its mass production for the control of uzi fly is discussed.
Mass production of N. thymus. N. thymus a hymenopteran parasitoid was first discovered and utilized to control the Uzi fly, E. bombycis during 1985 (Aruna and Manjunath, 2010). Since then, this parasitoid has been used in India for respect to house fly Musca domistica pupae. It is observed that on E. bombycis maximum parasitization of N. thymus was recorded on first and second day old pupae (Belgumpe and Jadhav 2017). The industrial production of N. thymus parasitoid involves two different processes.
(a) Production of housefly pupae. The housefly pupae collected in cage are kept for adult emergence at at 25±2 C temperature, 75±5% RH duration (Kumar et al., 2016). After 4-5 days, 80 % of adult flies will emerge and feeds on food containing sugar and milk powder in the ratio of 1:1. The cotton balls soaked in water is kept in a cage as reserved source of water. Temperature is increased to 28±2 C and 90±5% RH before introduction of the oviposition containers in 4-5 days old colony (Ortiz et al., 2016). In oviposition containers, food container are kept which constitute mixture of 5-10g milk powder and 5g yeast powder to 100g of used larval medium which is wrapped in black moistened cloth. After 5-6 hours, 20,000 eggs are removed from oviposition containers using brush (Wilkes et al., 1948; Pastor et al., 2014).
The freshly prepared larval diet containing mixture of 1.2kg wheat bran and 15g dry yeast and water is added to final weight of 5.5 kg and it is kept on a surface. House-fly eggs, 20,000-25,000 are kept on surface of larval diet and covered with cloth. Eggs hatch within 24 hours and maggots start feeding on the diet (Kumar et al., 2016). The maggots' colour changes into creamy white denoting initiation of pre-pupal stage. Transfer the pre-pupa gently on wire mesh (10 mesh size) on a perforated plastic tray (60cm × 30cm). The perforated plastic tray is kept on non-perforated plastic tray (60cm × 30cm). All the pre-pupa moves down through wire mesh and fall into the non-perforated tray kept below. Saw dust is spread in a thin layer to facilitate pupation. The color of pre-pupa turns into brownish color at pupal stage (Pastor et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2016). The quantity of pupa by separating on wire mesh is determined by volume (one ml will contain about 30-35 pupae)
(b) Production of N. thymus on house fly pupae. The fresh house fly pupa (500ml; about 20,000) are spread in a single layer in 60 cm × 30 cm plastic tray. Smear 50% honey solution on both sides of a plastic strip (20 cm × 2.5 cm) and keep 2-3 such strips in each tray as food for parasitoid adults. Release 4-5 thousand, one-day-old N. thymus adults in the tray in the ratio of 1:4 (1 female parasite: 4 house fly pupae). About 350ml parasitized housefly pupae will serve the purpose. Cover the tray with thick white cloth and tightly fix it with elastic to prevent the escape of N. thymus (Kumar et al., 2016) After 4 days, collect the parasitized pupa from the tray and keep in adult cage for emergence of house fly, if any Remove the empty shells by winnowing and collect parasitized pupae for supply to stake holders 7-10 days old parasitized pupae may be mixed in equal quantities so as to achieve emergence continuously for a week. After mixing, measure 50ml of house fly pupa parasitized by N. thymus and pack in 10cm x 10cm nylon net pouch. From each pouch, about 10,000 adults of the parasitoid emerge. These pouches can be easily transported to stakeholders by courier. 10-14 days old parasitized pupae can be refrigerated at 10±2 C for a maximum of one week in case of delay in supply, to prevent the quality damage to parasitoids (Senthoorraja et al., 2020). N. thymus completes its life cycle in in 10-12 days of uzi fly host. Adult longevity is completed within 6-8 days. Adults mate within 8-10 hours of emergence (Belgumpe and Jadhav 2017). Males and females mate more than once. On parasitization, the larvae of N. thymus feed within the host pupae, develop rapidly and attain full growth (Kumar et al., 1986).
Ovipositional behaviour of Nesolynx thymus on Exorista bombycis pupa. Behavioural manipulation approaches represent innovative and sustainable solutions for insect pest management in agriculture and ecosystem protection. These strategies leverage the intricate behaviours of insects, harnessing their natural instincts for the benefit of pest control (Chandana and Nadagouda 2023). Many behavioral responses culminate while oviposition of gravid female of N. thymus to parasitizes (host pupae), Exorista bombycis (Siddaiah and Danagoudra 2019). It involves series of behavioral responses before oviposition which includes host recognition, drumming, tapping and drilling. When a parasitoid (N. thymus) female is provided to host pupae, it walks in the oviposition container for host recognition. On recognizing the host, the parasitoid female mounted on the host, inspects the host by repeated contact using antennae. This process is known as drumming. After this, it is followed by tapping of the area by the abdominal tip that bents vertically downward using its sensory hairs. The parasitoid moves towards drummed area and coincides it with its abdominal tip. Drumming activity is little low frequent than tapping activity. When the process of drumming is completed, the parasitoid withdrew its ovipositor perpendicularly to the tapped area which is previously identified. At this time, the female parasitoid takes a firm grip on the host surface and became motionless in order to give sufficient reinforcement to the ovipositor (to hold it straight) for drilling .The process of drilling begins by clockwise and anticlockwise movement of the ovipositor and facilitates drilling. After drilling, entire ovipositor is inserted into the host to initiate oviposition on the pupa. At this time, both host and parasitoid remains immobile. After oviposition process, grooming process which involves cleaning of antennae and dorsal and lateral thoracic regions. The parasitoid feeds on the host body fluid (haemolymph) that oozes out from the feeding tube created in the hole drilled by the parasitoid on the host. Sometimes irregular behavioral response is observed which leads to host rejection (Siddaiah and Danagoudra 2019).
Host and parasitoid interactions. The host factors viz., pupae size, age and period of exposure to parasitoids influence the biology of parasitoids. The parasitoid size is important quality trait influenced by host size in biological control of a pest (Aruna and Manjunth 2009). The mean parasitism by N. thymus is depicted by its host size. It is significantly higher (74 percent) in the large sized host pupae having a volume of 263.89 mm3 of varying size with the mated females of N. thymus. Host age is the most important character that influences the mating behavior, reproductive traits and magnitude of parasitism in parastoids (Aruna and Manjunath 2010). Maximum progeny production in N. thymus was revealed on Two to four-day old puparia of E. sorbillans (Hasan et al., 2009). The nutritional quality of hosts decreases with age. The parasitoids show non-preference response to aged hosts. It was revealed that Diodromus collaris a pupal parasitoid of Plutella xylostella did not prefer old host pupae because of reduced nutritional quality which leads to cessation in development of the parasitoid. Hence the choice of host selection on the basis of age enhances survival advantage of hosts (Wang and Liu 2002). The host pupae of medium age classes were more preferred and more suitable for development (Pfannenstiel et al., 1996). Senthoorraja et al. (2020) revealed higher level of parasitism (65%) by N. thymus to 24 - 48 hours old host pupae. The parasitism rate reveals significant decline with an increase in host age after 72 hours (Senthoorraja et al., 2020).The period of exposure to parameters directly influences the rate of parasitism. Senthoorraja et al. (2020) revealed higher level of parasitism and with higher female progeny after 48 hours of exposure period. The reduction in parasitisation may be due to occurrence of superparasitism in exposure period beyond 48 hours. Higher level of superparasitism was reported when T. howardi was used against Chilo partellus (Baitha et al., 2004). Therefore, it indicates that 24-48 h is a suitable exposure period to adopt during mass production of parasitoids. The optimization of host factors influencing the parasitisation by parasitoid may enhance the efficacy of N. thymus and its mass multification and production in control of Uzi fly.
Fig. 1. Life cycle stages of N. thymus.
Scheme 1: Ovipositional behaviour of Nesolynx thymus on Exorista bombycis pupa (Siddaiah & Danagoudra 2019).
Scheme 1: Ovipositional behaviour of Nesolynx thymus on Exorista bombycis pupa (Siddaiah & Danagoudra 2019).
Table 1: Some important parasitoids against uzi fly pupae.
Sr. No. | Scientific name | Order | Family | Nature | Status |
1. | Nesolynx thymus | Hymenoptera | Eulophidae | Ecto-pupal parasitoid | Gregarious |
2. | Trichopria sp. | Hymenoptera | Diapriidae | Endo-larval pupal parasitoid | Gregarious |
3. | Exoristobia philippiensis | Hymenoptera | Encyrtidae | Endo-larval pupal parasitoid | Gregarious |
4. | Dirhinus sp | Hymenoptera | Chalcididae | Ecto-pupal parasitoid | Solitary |
5. | Brachymeri alugubris | Hymenoptera | Chalcididae | Ecto-pupal parasitoid | Solitary |
6. | Spalangi aendius | Hymenoptera | Ptermalidae | Endo-larval pupal parasitoid | Solitary |
7. | Pachycrepoideus veerannai | Hymenoptera | Pteromalidae | Endo-larval pupal parasitoid | Gregarious |
8. | Spilomicrus karnatakensis | Hymenoptera | Diapriidae | Ecto-pupal parasitoid | Solitary |
Table 2: Parasitization rate of N. thymus to the host age of Uzi fly (Belgumpe & Jadhav 2017).
Sr. No. | Age of E. bombycis (day) | Parasitism by N. thymus (%) |
1. | 0 | 80 |
2. | 1 | 75 |
3. | 2 | 60 |
4. | 3 | 45 |
5. | 4 | 30 |
6. | 5 | 20 |
7. | 6 | 15 |
8. | 7 | 8 |
Altman, G. H. & Farrell, B. D. (2022). Sericulture as a sustainable agroindustry. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy, 2, 100011.
Aruna, A. S. & Manjunath, D. (2010). Reproductive performance of Nesolynx thymus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) as influenced by host (Musca domestica) size. BioControl, 55, 245-252.
Aruna, A. S. & Manjunath. D. (2009). Reproductive performance of Nesolynx thymus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), in relation to age of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Biocontrol Science & Technology, 19, 139-149.
Baitha, A., Jalali, S. K., Rabindra, R. J., Venkatesan, T. & Rao, N. S. (2004). Parasitizing efficiency of the pupal parasitoid, Tetrastichus howardi (Olliff) (Hymenoptera: Eulopidae) on Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) at different exposure periods. Biological control, 18, 65-68.
Bari, F., Kumar, R. & Lavannya, V. (2023). Study of Uzi fly, Exorista bombycis (Louis) infestation during rearing of mulberry silkworm in different seasons in Karnataka. Indian Journal of Entomology, 142-144.
Barsagade, D. D. (2017). Tropical tasar sericulture. Industrial entomology, 291-319.
Baruah, J. P. & Kalita, C. (2020). Integrated pest management of uzi fly (Exorista sorbillans) in Muga silkworm Antheraea assamensis Helfer (Lepidoptera: saturniidae): A review. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8(4), 341-343.
Belgumpe, S. J. & Jadhav, A. D. (2017). Mass production and utilization of Nesolynx thymus Girault for biological control of uzi fly Exorista bombycis in Sericulture farming system of Maharashtra. Bull. Acad Indians. Series, 21(1), 33-36.
Chandana, C. R. & Nadagouda, S. (2023). Behavioral Manipulation of Insect Pests in Integrated Pest Management. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15(10), 1554-1561.
Choudhury, B., Kumar, R., Chutia, P. & Rajkhowa, G. (2014). Host infestation Potentiality of N. thymus to Control the Uzifly of muga silkworm, Antheraea assamensis (Helfer)-A Bio-control Tool for Controlling Uzifly. Biological Forum-An International Journal, 6(1), 1-4.
DeBach, P., Rosen, D., & Kennett, C. E. (1971). Biological control of coccids by introduced natural enemies. Biological control, 165-194.
Gahukar, R. T. (2014). Impact of major biotic factors on tropical silkworm rearing in India and monitoring of unfavourable elements: a review. Sericologia, 54, 150-170.
Giora, D., Marchetti, G., Cappellozza, S., Assirelli, A., Saviane, A., Sartori, L. & Marinello, F. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of trends in mulberry and silkworm research on the production of silk and its by-products. Insects, 13(7), 568.
Haripriya, K. & Mamatha, D. M. (2023). An extensive appraisal of life cycles, ecological characteristics of mulberry and silkworm associated insect pests. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 44.
Hasan, M. M., Uddin, M. R., Rahman Khan, M. A. & Saleh Reza, A. M. (2009). Effects of host density, host age, temperature and gamma irradiation on the mass production of Nesolynx thymus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an endoparasitoid of Uzi fly, Exorista sorbillans (Diptera: Tachinidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology, 19(sup1), 243-259.
Hasan, M. M., Uddin, M. R., Rahman., Khan, M. A. & Saleh Reza, A. M. (2009). Effects of host density, host age, temperature and gamma irradiation on the mass production of Nesolynx thymus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an endoparasitoid of Uzi fly, Exorista sorbillans (Diptera: Tachinidae). Biocontrol Science & Technology, 19, 243-259.
Jadhav, A. D. & Sathe, T. V. (2016). Host preference by Uzi fly Exorista bombycis L. in pure line bivoltine breeds FC1 and FC2 (Bombyx mori L.) and Economical loss in seed cocoon production. Biolife, 4(1), 88-93.
Karthik, T., & Rathinamoorthy, R. (2017). Sustainable silk production. In Sustainable fibres and textiles (pp. 135-170). Woodhead Publishing.
Khandagale, P. P., Padsala, J., Landge, S. A., Siddhapara, M. R. & Patel, P. R. (2023). Effective Augmentative Release of Natural Enemies and Agro-ecosystem Management in Integrated Pest Management. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15(12), 425-430.
Kumar, J. B., Kumar V. & Sivaprasad, V. (2016). Biological Control of Insect Pests in Mulberry Sericulture. In proceedings, Central Sericultural Research and Training Institutes, Mysuru-570008.
Nirmala, M. R. & Veeranna, G. (1998). Biology of gregarious parasitoids of uzi fly, Exorista bombycis Louis (Diptera: Tachinidae). Journal of Biological Control, 11-17.
Ortiz, J. C., Ruiz, A. T., Morales-Ramos, J. A., Thomas, M., Rojas, M. G., Tomberlin, J. K. & Jullien, R. L. (2016). Insect mass production technologies. In Insects as sustainable food ingredients (pp. 153-201). Academic Press
Padaki, N. V., Das, B. & Basu, A. (2015). Advances in understanding the properties of silk. Advances in silk science and technology, 3-16.
Pastor, B., Martinez-Sanchez, A. S., Ståhls, G. A. & Rojo, S. (2014). Introducing improvements in the mass rearing of the housefly: biological, morphometric and genetic characterization of laboratory strains. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 104(4), 486-493.
Pfannenstiel, R. S. Browning, H. W. & Smith, J. W. (1996). Suitability of Mexican rice borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a host for Pediobius furvus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Environmental Entomology, 25, 672-676.
Rahmathulla, V. K. (2012). Management of climatic factors for successful silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) crop and higher silk production: a review. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology, 2012(1), 121234.
Reddy, B. V., Reddy, P. L., Babu, M. S., Sujatha, B. & Naik, S. S. (2015). Egg Laying Patterns of the Uzi Fly Exorista sorbillans on the Larvae of the Silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Global Journal of Bio-science and Bitechnology, 4(1), 175-180.
Sakthivel, N., Kumaresan, P., Qadri, S. M. H., Ravikumar, J. & Balakrishna, R. (2012). Adoption of integrated pest management practices in sericulture-A case study in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Biopesticides, 5, 212.
Senthoorraja, R., Subaharan, K., Gupta, A., Basavarajappa, S., Lalitha, Y., Bakthavatsalam, N. & Chandran, K. P. (2020). Host factors influencing the parasitism by Nesolynx thymus (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on housefly, Musca domestica L. Journal of Biological Control, 34(3), 200-207.
Siddaiah, A. A. & Danagoudra, M. (2019). Oviposition behavior of an ectopupal parasitoid Nesolynx thymus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae): A biocontrol agent of the Uzi fly Exorista bombycis (Diptera: Tachinidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 7(1), 190-193.
Singh, A., Kumar, V., Majumdar, M., Guha, L. & Neog, K. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Insect Pest Management in Muga Silkworm (Antheraea assamensis Helfer): Current Scenario and Future Prospects. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 46(5), 47-55.
Singh, R. N. & Maheshwari, M. (2002). Biological control of pests of Non-mulberry silkworms and its host plants in India. International Journal of Industrial Entomology, 4(2), 83-91.
Singh, R. N. & Saratchandra, B. (2002). An integrated approach in the pest management in sericulture. International Journal of Industrial Entomology, 5(2), 141-151.
Singh, R. N. & Saratchandra, B. (2003). Biological control strategy of uzi fly in sericulture. International Journal of Industrial Entomology, 6(2), 125-132.
Sowmya, P. & Rajitha, K. (2021). Uzi fly [Exorista bombycis (Louis)]-a menace to sericulture industry: a review. Biochemical & Cellular Archives, 21.
Wang, X. and Liu, S. (2002). Effects of host age on the performance of Diadromus collaris, a pupal parasitoid of Plutella xylostella. Biological Control, 47, 293-307.
Wilkes, A., Bucher, G. E., Cameron, J. M. & West Jr, A. S. (1948). Studies on the housefly (Musca domestica L.): I. The biology and large scale production of laboratory populations. Canadian Journal of Research, 26(1), 8-25.
Jasmeena Qadir, Tajamul Islam, Somagaini
Pavankumar, Ravi Kant and Shalini Aryan (2024). Nesolynx thymus (Girault) as an Effective Biocontrol Agent of Uzi fly, Exorista bombycis (Louis). International Journal of Theoretical & Applied
Sciences, 16(1), 93-98.