Author:
Irfan Reyaz Sheikh1,2, Falak Jan1, Ifrah Rashid2, Gowhar Iqbal2, Tasaduq Hussain Shah2 and Syed Talia Mushtaq2*
Journal Name: International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 16(2): 147–151, 2025
Address:
1ICAR - Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Panch Marg, Yari Road, Mumbai, India.
2Faculty of Fisheries, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.
(Corresponding author: Syed Talia Mushtaq*syedtalia2020@gmail.com)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/IJET.2025.16.2.20
Triplophysa marmorata belongs to the genus Triplophysa (Rendahl, 1933) and the family Balitoridea, subfamily Nemacheilinae, with 124 nominal species in this genus worldwide (Li et al., 2015). In India, the distribution of this genus has been reported only from the upper catchment area in Jammu and Kashmir, and the Lahul and Spiti area of Himachal Pradesh (Kullander et al., 1999). In India, 10 Triplophysa were described by Menon (1987). The species of Triplophysa exhibit marked sexual dimorphism: Males possess a nodular, raised skin on both sides of the head and a thick nodular pad on the dorsal surfaces of the broadened and widened pectoral-fin rays (Zhu, 1989). Triplophysa marmorata is a benthopelagic fish found in the snow-covered waters of the Himalayas in Kashmir. It is locally known as "Ara Gurun" (Heckel, 1838). Its eyes are high on the head, its mouth is inferior, its scales are absent, and it has three pairs of barbs: two rostral and one maxillary pair. The colour of the ground is pale yellowish or whitish (Heckel, 1838). It differs from Triplophysa kashmirensis by a shorter length of lateral line and caudal peduncle.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a powerful tool for visualizing the surface architecture of biological tissues, providing valuable insights into their functional morphology. SEM has been successfully employed to study the morphology of various fish organs, including gills, liver, kidney, and olfactory epithelium (Esmaeili and Gholami 2011; Cordero et al., 2017; Jawad et al., 2022). These studies have revealed important details about the structure and function of these organs, as well as their responses to environmental stressors (Samanta et al., 2018; Waryani et al., 2013). A thorough search of existing literature reveals a limited number of studies on the ultrastructure of Triplophysa species. While some studies have used SEM to examine the olfactory epithelium of other loach species (Waryani et al., 2013), a comprehensive analysis of the surface ultrastructure of multiple organ systems in Triplophysa marmorata is lacking. Some researchers have also described the use of SEM to study fish scales (Cordero et al., 2017). Furthermore, research exists on the histopathological effects of industrial and agricultural effluents on fish organs, highlighting the importance of understanding the structural integrity of these organs in the face of environmental stressors. This study, therefore, aims to fill a critical knowledge gap and provide baseline data for future research on the conservation and management of this endemic loach species.
Specimens of T. marmorata (Fig. 1) were collected from freshwaters in Kashmir using local traps. Fish were maintained in aquaria before dissection to avoid damage to internal organs. The gills, jaw tissues, skin from near the caudal fin, and the anterior intestine were carefully extracted. Samples were washed with distilled water and fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde with Na-cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2). Dehydration was achieved using ascending ethanol concentrations, followed by tetramethylsilane drying. A gold coating was applied to prevent charging during SEM imaging, performed at 10 kV using secondary electron emission mode (Dey et al., 1989).
Fig. 1. Specimen of T. marmorata.
T. marmorata exhibits a gross gill structure typical of teleost fishes (Fig. 2). Each gill comprises a gill arch, gill rakers, and gill filaments, arranged in two rows along the arch, forming anterior and posterior hemibranchs that constitute the holobranch. The length of gill filaments varies within a single arch and among different arches, being longest in the arch's central region and shorter toward the dorsal and ventral ends. Each gill arch supports two rows of gill rakers on the outer convex surface facing the opercular cavity. The first holobranch features longer and thinner rakers than subsequent arches. A variable number of secondary lamellae radiates from both surfaces of each filament, more developed distally and diminishing proximally. The SEM analysis of T. marmorata skin revealed voids surrounded by a loose network of cells, resembling sponge or coral-like structures (Fig. 3). The epidermal surface cells exhibited intricate microridges, varying in shape, curved, straight, branched, or unbroken, forming fingerprint- or honeycomb-like patterns. The mouth of T. marmorata is protrusible, featuring three pairs of short barbels and thick upper and lower jaws (Kottelat and Freyhof 2007). The oral cavity's modest size reflects an adaptation for consuming small food items efficiently. The species has edentulous jaws, with a highly protrusive upper jaw and a slightly protrusive lower jaw. The upper lip is thin, whereas the lower lip is thicker (Fig. 4). The anterior part of the intestine of T. marmorata exhibits a simple tubular structure without significant differentiation between regions (Fig. 5). SEM analysis reveals the presence of columnar epithelial cells with brush-border microvilli, forming a dense mat on the apical surfaces of intestinal cells. The intestinal mucosa is interspersed with goblet cells that secrete mucus, while tight junctions between epithelial cells were observed.
Fig. 2. Showing the anatomical structure of the gill under SEM at 70x, 200x, 500x and 1000x magnifications.
Fig. 3. Showing the anatomical structure of skin under SEM at 1000x and 5000x magnifications.
Fig. 4. Showing the anatomical structure of the lips and mouth under SEM at 200x and 5000x magnifications.
Fig. 5. Shows the anatomical structure of skin under SEM at 5000x, 500x and 1000x magnifications.
DISCUSSION
In T. marmorata, gills serve multiple roles beyond respiration, including excretion of metabolic waste and osmotic balance regulation (Moyle and Cech 1996; Norman, 1963). The variation in gill filament length likely optimises respiratory efficiency by increasing surface area exposed to water flow. The long, fine rakers on the first holobranch indicate a feeding strategy adapted to filtering detritus and small invertebrates, aligning with its habitat in freshwater ecosystems with suspended particulate matter (Meraj et al., 2016). Structural features, including filament length, lamellar arrangement, and specialized rakers, are critical for survival in environments with variable oxygen levels and high particulate loads, illustrating the species' ecological plasticity and evolutionary fitness. The spongy network observed in the skin may aid in moisture retention, enhancing the skin's protective functions against environmental stressors. Microridges likely increase surface area, facilitating gas exchange and nutrient absorption (Cordero et al., 2017; Lau et al., 2019; Nowsheen et al., 2023). These adaptations align with studies highlighting the role of microridges in maintaining homeostasis and defending against microbial invasion in fluctuating environments (Ali et al., 2023). The voids and loose cell network contribute to skin elasticity, allowing it to absorb shocks and adapt to environmental changes. Despite these adaptations, the skin remains vulnerable to pollutants and pathogens, and the complexity of microridge structures may complicate healing if damaged.
The combination of a compact oral cavity, edentulous jaws, and specialized lip structures positions T. marmorata as a benthic feeder, well-suited for foraging in sediment-laden or particulate-rich environments. These adaptations minimize energy expenditure while maximizing efficiency in capturing soft-bodied or particulate food, aligning with the ecological role of fish in freshwater ecosystems with limited prey diversity (Sibbing, 1991; Motta and Kotrschal 1992). The intestinal structure reflects the species’ diet, which primarily consists of small invertebrates, algae, and organic detritus. The presence of brush-border microvilli significantly increases the surface area for nutrient absorption, optimizing nutrient uptake (Buddington and Diamond 1987). The goblet cells play a crucial role in reducing friction during food transit and protecting the epithelial lining from mechanical damage (Wilson and Castro 2011). The absence of a stomach further supports rapid nutrient absorption, a characteristic commonly observed in fish with continuous feeding habits (Kapoor et al., 1976). Similar digestive adaptations have been documented in other loaches and cyprinid fish occupying benthic habitats (Clements and Raubenheimer 2006).
Ali, A., Zhang, N. & Santos, R. M. (2023). Mineral Characterization Using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): A Review of the Fundamentals, Advancements, and Research Directions. Appl. Sci., 13, 12600.
Buddington, R. K. & Diamond, J. M. (1987). Pyloric ceca of fish: a" new" absorptive organ. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 252(1), G65-G76.
Clements, K. D. & Raubenheimer, D. (2006). Feeding and nutrition. The Physiology of Fishes, 47, 82.
Cordero, H., Ceballos-Francisco, D., Cuesta, A. & Esteban, M. Á. (2017). Dorso-ventral skin characterization of the farmed fish gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). PLoS One. 12(6), e0180438.
Dey, S., Baul, T. B., Roy, B. & Dey, D. (1989). A new rapid method of air‐drying for scanning electron microscopy using tetramethylsilane. Journal of Microscopy, 156(2), 259-261.
Esmaeili, H. R., Khaefi, R., Sayyadzadeh, G., Tahami, M., Parsi, B. & Gholamifard, A. (2014). Scale surface microstructure and scale size in three mugilid fishes (Teleostei, Mugilidae) of Iran from three different habitats. European Journal of Biology, 73(1), 31-42.
Heckel, J. J. (1838). Fische aus Caschmir gesammelt und herausgegeben von Carl Freiherrn von Hügel, beschrieben von J. J. Heckel. Wien. 1-86, Pls. 1-12.
Jawad, L. A., Shamsan, E. F., Aguilar, G. & Hoedemakers, K. (2023). Scanning electron microscopy and morphological analysis reveal differences in the otolith morphology of three species of the family Lethrinidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) from Yemen. The Anatomical Record, 306(3), 651-664.
Jhingran, V. G. (1991). Fish and Fisheries of India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation.
Kapoor, B. G., Smit, H. & Verighina, I. A. (1976). The alimentary canal and digestion in teleosts. In Advances in marine biology (Vol. 13, pp. 109-239). Academic Press.
Kottelat, M. & Freyhof, J. (2007). Handbook of European freshwater fishes (Vol. 13). Cornol, Switzerland: Publications Kottelat.
Kullander, S. O., F. Fang, B. Delling & Åhlander E. (1999). The fishes of the Kashmir Valley. p. 99-167 In L. Nyman (ed.) River Jhelum, Kashmir Valley: impacts on the aquatic environment.
Lau, C. S., Hassanbhai, A., Wen, F., Wang, D., Chanchareonsook, N., Goh, B. T., Yu, N. & Teoh, S. H. (2019). Evaluation of decellularized tilapia skin as a tissue engineering scaffold. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 13(10), pp.1779-1791.
Li, W. J., Chen, X. C. & Hu, Y. P. (2015). A new species of the genus Triplophysa (Nemacheilinae), Triplophysa qilianensis sp. from Qinghai, China. Zootaxa., 3905(3), 418-424.
Menon, A. G. K. (1987). The fauna of India and the adjacent countries. Pisces. Vol. IV. Teleostei - Cobitoidea. Part 1. Homalopteridae. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta. i-x + 1-259, Pls. 1-16.
Meraj, M., Yousuf, A. R., Bhat, F. A., Ali, M. N., Ganai, B. A., Shahi, N., Habiba, B., Ganaie, H. A., Shah, N. U. D., Rahman, M. & Rather, M. I. (2016). Hematological profiling of Triplophysa marmorata (Heckel 1838) from water bodies of Kashmir Himalaya A Perspective. J Fish Aquat Sci., 11, 296-303.
Motta, P. J. & Kotrschal, K. (1992). Correlative, experimental, and comparative evolutionary approaches in ecomorphology.
Motta, P. J. (1984). Mechanics and functions of jaw protrusion in teleost fishes: a review. Copeia, pp.1-18.
Moyle, P. B., Cech JJ., Jr (1996). Fishes: an introduction to Ichthyology. Third Edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1996. p. 590.
Norman, J. R. (1963). History of Fishes, second ed., Geenwood, P.H., (Ed.).
Nowsheen Mushtaq, Syed Talia Mushtaq, Tasaduq Hussain Shah, Farooz Ahmad Bhat, Syed Aalia Mushtaq and Aziz-ul-Rehman (2023). Otolith Atlas of Freshwater Bony Fishes from Kashmir Waters in the Indian Himalayan Region. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15(2), 1043-1045.
Perna, S. A. & Fernandes, M. N. (1996). Gill morphometry of a facultative air-breathing Loricariid fish, Hypostomus plecostomus (Walbaum) with special emphasis to aquatic respiration. Fish Physiol Biochem., 15, 213-220.
Rendahl, H. (1933). Studien über innerasiatische Fische. Arkiv för Zoologi., 25A(11), 1-51.
Samanta, P., Kumari, P., Pal, S., Mukherjee, A. K. & Ghosh, A. R. (2018). Histopathological and ultrastructural alterations in some organs of Oreochromis niloticus exposed to glyphosate-based herbicide, Excel Mera 71. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure, 6(1), 35-43.
Sibbing, F. A. (1982). Pharyngeal mastication and food transport in the carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): a cineradiographic and electromyographic study. Journal of Morphology, 172(2), 223-258.
Sibbing, F. A. (1991). Food processing by mastication in cyprinid fish. In: Feeding and texture of food (pp. 57-92).
Waryani, B., Dai, R., Zhao, Y., Zhang, C. & Abbasi, A. R. (2013). Surface ultrastructure of the olfactory epithelium of loach fish, Triplophysa dalaica (Kessler, 1876) (Cypriniformes: Balitoridae: Nemacheilinae). Italian Journal of Zoology, 80(2), 195-203.
Wilson, J. M. & Castro, L. F. C. (2011). Morphological diversity of the gastrointestinal tract in fishes. In: The multifunctional gut of fish. Academic Press, Ámsterdam. pp1-55.
Zhu, S. Q. (1989). The loaches of the subfamily Nemacheilinae in China (Cypriniformes: Cobitidae). Jiangsu Science & Technology Publishing House, Nanjing, China. i-x + 1-150. [In Chinese, English summary.