Author:
Swapnadip Dandapat1 and Sanjoy Kumar Bordolui2*
Journal Name: International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 16(1): 63–67, 2025
Address:
1Post Graduate, Department of Seed Science and Technology,
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia (West Bengal), India.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Seed Science and Technology,
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia (West Bengal), India.
(Corresponding author: Sanjoy Kumar Bordolui*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/IJET.2025.16.1.9
GA3, germination, hormonal priming, kinetin, vigour.
Rice is the staple food of more than sixty percent of world's population and has been cultivated in Asia since ancient times generation after generation. In Asia and Africa, about 90% of world's rice is grown as well as produced and consumed. As germination is a crucial stage in the plant's life cycle and is influenced by a number of environmental factors and the viability of the seed structure to determine the potential growth of the embryo, rice is typically grown by direct seeding or seedling transplanting.
The rice farmers who use the conventional transplanting procedure must contend with impending water shortages and rising labour costs. Poor germination capability under field conditions and the steadily increasing global population, we must choose a better choice to alleviate the food crisis and improve rice production. The issue of inadequate seed germination in crop plants is being addressed using a variety of methods, seed priming is an efficient and practical method for boosting seed vigour, synchronising germination, promoting the growth of seedlings and yield in various crops (Bajehbaj et al., 2010). This pre-sowing method involves partially hydrating seeds to the point where germination-related metabolic processes start but imbibit development does happen (Chen et al., 2001). In many field crops grown in challenging environmental conditions, seed priming is a strategy that has been proven to be effective and simple to use to increase yield, uniformity, and speed of seed emergence. The physiological activities at the early stage of seed imbibitions are activated by seed priming, including the elicitation of DNA repair pathways and antioxidant mechanisms to preserve genome integrity, ensuring enhanced germination and seedling establishment (Paparella et al., 2015). Numerous recent research set up a strong emphasis on standardising seed priming methods in order to increase germination and shorten emergence times and achieve a consistent crop stand. Such beneficial effects of seed priming may result from the de novo synthesis of some germination-promoting compounds, early DNA replication, increased ATP availability, osmotic adjustments, membrane reorganisation by restoring their original structures, and decreased metabolite leakage.
Priming techniques have shown some promising effects in better crop yield and increasing micronutrient concentrations in cereals. As it is expected to be species and dose- dependent (Wang et al., 2017), several seed priming techniques may be applied to enhance germination and stand establishment. Organic substances known as plant growth regulators (PGRs) are produced in trace amounts in crops. The growth, development, and yield of plants are significantly influenced by plant hormones, despite their modest concentration (Cothren and Oosterhuis 2010). According to certain studies, priming with indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), and ascorbic acid boosts germination rate, plant growth, early growth, grain quantity and quality, and grain quality (Anosheh et al., 2011). Recent research has focused on the utilisation of hormone priming, notably GA3, in rice germination under unfavourable circumstances (Aymen et al., 2018). The germination performance and yield of many crops have been significantly enhanced by seed priming with plant growth hormones like auxin (IAA), gibberellins (GA), abscisic acid, and ethylene in both normal and stress situations. To improve the uniformity of seed germination, seedling establishment, and yield of different field crops like rice, corn, safflower, wheat, beetroot, and sunflower, plant growth regulators like gibberellins (GA), abscisic acid (ABA), and salicylic acid (SA) have been frequently used through hormonal priming (Anosheh et al., 2011).
It is generally known that gibberellic acid breaks down the starch contained in seeds so that growing embryos can use it during germination (Taiz et al., 2006). Therefore, when gibberellic was used as a priming solution for rice cultivars, seedling emergence and dry matter production significantly rose (Chen et al., 2005). Exogenous handling of plant hormones, notably GA3, counteracts the effects of ABA and encourages the relaxation of dormancy, which results in seed germination (Chen et al., 2005).
The present investigation was conducted with rice genotype (IET4786) with two different hormonal priming (GA3 and Kinetin) having three different concentration in the seed testing laboratory, BCKV, Mohanpur, Nadia, WB, India during 2022 using a completely randomised design with three replications. Seeds priming materials were distilled water for soaking duration 12 hours (T1 as control), GA3 @ 30 ppm for soaking time 12 hours (T2), GA3 @ 50 ppm for soaking duration 12 hours (T3), GA3 @ 70 ppm for soaking time 12 hours (T4), kinetin @ 2 ppm for soaking duration 18 hours (T5), kinetin @ 4 ppm for soaking time 18 hours (T6), and kinetin @ 6 ppm for soaking duration 18 hours (T7). The seeds were collected from AICRP on seed BCKV. The collected seed were evaluated both in the Seed Testing Laboratory.
Germination percentage (%): The petri dish was cleaned with methylated spirit and filled with cotton and the blotting paper was placed on it. Distilled water was used to wet it. The treated seeds were placed on the blotting paper and the lid was covered. Four petri dishes were kept in the germinator for each treated seed, each petri dish having 100 seeds. After fourteen days, we took out the petri dishes from the seed germinator and counted the number of germinated and ungerminated seeds.
Calculation:
Root length (cm): After fourteen days of germination in the laboratory (glass plate method), the root lengths were measured and recorded in cm by measuring the length between the tip of the primary root to the collar region of ten randomly selected normal seedlings.
Shoot length (cm): The shoot lengths were measured after fourteen days of germination in the laboratory, and the mean value was recorded in cm for the length between the tip of the shoot and the collar region. The 10 normal seedlings which were taken for root length determination, also used for shoot length measurement.
Average seedling length (cm): Sum of root and shoot length of ten normal seedlings was recorded to calculate total seedling length.
Vigour index I: Computed the vigour index by multiplying the average seedling length with the germination percentage.
Vigour index I = Germination % × Average seedling length (cm) (Abdul-Baki and Anderson 1973)
Dry weight of ten seedlings (mg): 10 fresh seedlings were selected from each replication; care was taken to ensure that the least amount of water adhered to the seedlings. The unit of fresh weight was recorded in milligram (mg).
Dry weight of ten seedlings (mg): Ten seedlings, which were selected for measuring fresh weight, packed in an aluminium container without lid and dried at 80°C for 2 hours. The seedlings' dry weight was then measured.
Vigour index II: Vigour Index II computed the vigour index by multiplying the average seedling dry weight with the germination percentage (Abdul-Baki and Anderson 1973).
Vigour index II = Germination % × Average seedling dry weight (g)
Germination index: Coolbear et al. (1984) computed this parameter by using the following formula.
50% Germination time (days): We recorded the number of germinated seeds that germinated everyday according to the AOSA approach. By using the following formulas from Coolbear et al. (1984), to determine the time to achieve 50% germination (T50):
T50=ti+ N2 - nitj-tinj-ni
Where N is the total number of germinated seed and ni, nj are the progressive numbers of seeds that have germinated by adjoining calculate at period of times ti and tj, respectively, but ni > N/2 >nj.
Germination energy: Germination energy (GE) was measured on the fourth day of germination. It is the percentage of seeds that germinated 4 days after planting, in relation to the total number of seeds tested (Ruan et al., 2002).
Mean Germination Time (MGT) (days):
MGT=Dnn In this experiment, we followed the Ellis and Roberts (1980) equation to compute the MGT.
Where, ‘n’ denotes the no. of seeds that germinated on day D, and D denotes the number of days since the start of germination.
Germination percentage: Significantly highest germination percentage was recorded in T3 (98.33) followed by T6 and T2. But T3, T6 and T6 priming materials showed non-significant difference. While lowest germination percentage (92.667) observed in control seed (T1) preceded by T4, T7 and T5. Among T4, T7 and T5 treatments were non-significantly varied (Table 1). An analogous result was found in tomatoes by Ray and Bordolui (2022b).
Root length (cm): Significantly tallest root was recorded for T7 (15.24 cm) and it was followed by T5, T6 and T3, whereas, shortest roots were recorded for control (T1) (12.24 cm) that was preceded by T4 and T2, though non-significant difference was noticed among all these three treatments. T3 and T6 were not able to produce significant length difference among them. Using potassium nitrate, Choudhury and Bordolui (2022b) saw a similar outcome in Bengal gram.
Shoot length (cm): Among the treatments, shoot length was varied significantly. T4 showed the highest shoot length (13.44 cm) which was followed by T3, T2, and T5. But T1 showed the shortest shoot length (7.20 cm) which was preceded by T7 and T5. But non-significant difference was observed in between T5 and T7. Using sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4) nutri-priming to lengthen shoots.
Average length of seedling (cm): Average length of seedling was varied significantly. The minimum average length of seedling was observed in T1 (19.44 cm) preceded by T6, T5 and T7, while longest seedling was recorded for control (T3) (26.44 cm) followed by T4 and T2. But non significant distinction could be noticed among only T5 and T6; T2 and T7.
Table 1: Effect of different hormonal priming on some physiological characters such as germination percentage, root length, shoot length, total seedling length
Sr. No. | Priming material | Germination (%) (Tr value) | Length of root (cm) | Length of Shoot (cm) | Average Length of Seedling (cm) |
1 | T1 | 92.667 (74.266) | 12.240 | 8.400 | 20.640 |
2 | T2 | 97.000(80.087) | 12.680 | 11.720 | 24.400 |
3 | T3 | 98.333(82.816) | 13.480 | 12.960 | 26.440 |
4 | T4 | 96.000(78.686) | 12.480 | 13.440 | 25.920 |
5 | T5 | 97.000(80.087) | 14.360 | 8.920 | 23.280 |
6 | T6 | 97.667(81.223) | 13.520 | 9.720 | 23.240 |
7 | T7 | 96.000(78.686) | 15.240 | 8.880 | 24.120 |
CD (0.01) | 3.762 | 0.833 | 0.437 | 0.728 | |
SEm (±) | 1.228 | 0.272 | 0.143 | 0.238 | |
SE(d) | 1.737 | 0.385 | 0.202 | 0.336 | |
C.V. | 2.679 | 3.510 | 2.373 | 1.727 | |
Note: T1 (control), T2 (GA3 30ppm), T3 (GA3 50ppm), T4 (GA3 70ppm), T5 (Kinetin 2 ppm), T6 (Kinetin 4 ppm), T7 (Kinetin 6 ppm) | |||||
Fresh weight of ten seedlings (mg): Significantly maximum seedling fresh weight was noticed for T3 (58.333mg), followed by T2, T4, and T5. However, the lowest magnitude was found in control seed (T1; 37.667mg) preceded by T7 and T6. Though some treatments were not statistically significant varied like T2, T4, and T5; T6, T4, and T5 (Table 2). When Chakraborty and Bordolui (2021) compared Ag nano priming to other treatments, they discovered that it increased the fresh weight of green grams seedlings.
Dry weight of ten seedlings (mg): There was no statistically significant difference between primed and control seeds for dry weight of the seedlings (mg). Although T4 (14.733 mg) treatment resulted in the highest dry weight, T1 (13.867 mg) treatment showed the lowest dry weight. Osmo-priming with PEG solution increased dry weight following seed treatment in wheat, according to Ghiyasi et al. (2008).
Vigour index I: Vigour index I was seen significantly highest magnitude for T3 (2599.933) which was followed by T4 and T2. Lowest value was noted in control (T1) (1801.44) which was preceded by T5, T6, and T7, albeit there was no significant difference between these three treatments. There was non- significant variation between T2 and T7. According to Masood et al. (2012), hormonal seed priming is a widely used technique to enhance seed germination, seedling growth, and vigour under challenging circumstances.
Vigour index II: Highest vigour index II, T3 (1445.767) was the most notable finding for me, followed by T4 and T6, albeit there was no statistically significant difference between any of these three treatments. The lowest value was recorded for control (1284.933), preceded by T5, T2 and T7. There was no noticeable Vigour index II change between T2, T5, and T7. A popular method for improving vigour index-II in difficult situations is hormonal seed priming (Masood et al., 2012).
Table 2: Effect of different hormonal priming on fresh and dry weight of seedling, Vigour index I and II (VI- I and VI- II).
Sr. No. | Priming material | Fresh weight of ten seedlings (mg) | Dry weight of ten seedlings (mg) | VI- I | VI- II |
1 | T1 | 37.667 | 13.867 | 1,801.440 | 1,284.933 |
2 | T2 | 47.333 | 14.133 | 2,366.893 | 1,370.800 |
3 | T3 | 58.333 | 14.700 | 2,599.933 | 1,445.767 |
4 | T4 | 45.667 | 14.733 | 2,488.400 | 1,415.200 |
5 | T5 | 45.667 | 14.000 | 2,257.873 | 1,357.733 |
6 | T6 | 44.333 | 14.433 | 2,269.594 | 1,409.433 |
7 | T7 | 41.000 | 14.467 | 2,315.960 | 1,388.933 |
CD (0.01) | 2.315 | NS | 94.090 | 92.486 | |
SEm (±) | 0.756 | 0.272 | 30.722 | 30.199 | |
SE(d) | 1.069 | 0.385 | 43.448 | 42.708 | |
C.V. | 2.864 | 3.290 | 2.314 | 3.785 | |
Note: T1 (control), T2 (GA3 30ppm), T3 (GA3 50ppm), T4 (GA3 70ppm), T5 (Kinetin 2 ppm), T6 (Kinetin 4 ppm), T7 (Kinetin 6 ppm) | |||||
Germination energy: Significantly highest germination energy was observed in T6 (98.00) which was followed by T3, T2, and T5. But all these four priming materials were not statistically significant varied. But control T1 (95.00) had the lowest magnitude which was preceded by T7 and T4. With the following few exceptions, the genotype response of rice to seed priming followed a pattern that was identical to the average influence of priming: T4 and T7 were unable to have a substantial impact on control subjects. Seed priming with Kinetin improved the germination and growth of different species, such as rice (Roohi and Jameson 1991).
Mean germination time (days): Lowest mean germination time was noted in T6 (1.414 days). But some treatments were non-significant difference viz. T2 andT3; T3 and T6. While, maximum mean germination time taken for control T1(9.86 days) followed byT4, T7 andT5 but non-significant difference was noticed among T5 andT7; T4 andT7. A similar outcome was observed in tomatoes by Ray and Bordolui (2022a).
Germination Index: Significantly highest germination index was recorded for T3 (94.967) after that the treatments were T2, T6 and T4. But T2, T6 and T4 were non-significantly varied. Control or control i.e., T1 (88.833) was observed lowest germination index preceded by T7 and T5, though non-significant difference was observed between T5 andT7. According to Roohi and Jameson (1991), the speed of germination in rice was enhanced by seed priming with gibberellic acid.
50% Germination time (hours): T3 (12.5hours) took the least time to germinate 50% of the provided seed, which was preceded by T4 and T7, however these three were not statistically significant difference. While control T1 (14.34 hours) shown the maximum time to 50% germination followed by T6, T5, and T2. None of the three (T2, T5, and T6) showed statistically significant differences. Similar outcomes were observed in carrots primed with Ag-nano particles by Kundu and Bordolui (2024).
Table 3: Effect of different hormonal priming on germination index, 50% germination time, mean germination time and germination energy.
Sr. No. | Priming material | GE | GI | MGT | 50% GT |
1 | T1 | 95.000 | 88.833 | 9.860 | 14.340 |
2 | T2 | 97.000 | 93.500 | 2.243 | 12.930 |
3 | T3 | 97.333 | 94.967 | 2.134 | 12.500 |
4 | T4 | ,96.000 | 93.333 | 5.008 | 12.650 |
5 | T5 | 97.000 | 92.250 | 4.260 | 13.220 |
6 | T6 | 98.000 | 93.500 | 1.414 | 13.500 |
7 | T7 | 95.000 | 91.583 | 4.510 | 12.800 |
CD(0.01) | 1.682 | 0.956 | 0.806 | 0.734 | |
SEm (±) | 0.549 | 0.312 | 0.263 | 0.240 | |
SE(d) | 0.777 | 0.441 | 0.372 | 0.339 | |
C.V. | 0.986 | 0.584 | 10.843 | 3.159 | |
Note: T1 (control), T2 (GA3 30ppm), T3(GA3 50ppm), T4(GA3 70ppm), T5 (Kinetin 2 ppm), T6 (Kinetin 4 ppm), T7 (Kinetin 6 ppm); GE=Germination Energy; GI= Germination Index; MGT= Mean Germination Time (days); 50% GT= 50% Germination Time (hrs) | |||||
Fig. 1. Effect of different hormonal priming on germination perventage. | Fig. 2. Effect of different hormonal priming on root length (cm), shoot length(cm) and average seedling length(cm). | Fig. 3. Effect of different hormonal priming on vigour index I and Vigour index II. |
Abdul-Baki, A. and Anderson, J. D. (1973). Vigor Determination in Soybean Seed by Multiple Criteria. Crop Science, 13, 630-633
Anosheh, H. P., Sadeghi, H. and Emam, Y. (2011). Chemical priming with urea and KNO3 enhances maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) seed viability under abiotic stress. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 14, 289-295.
Aymen, E. M. (2018). Seed priming with plant growth regulators to improve crop abiotic stress tolerance. In: Rakshit A, Singh H. (Eds), Advances in Seed Priming. Springer, Singapore, 95–106.
Bajehbaj, A. A. (2010). The effects of NaCl priming on salt tolerance in sunflower germination and seedling grown under salinity conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(12), 1764–1770.
Chakraborty, A. and Bordolui, S. K. (2021). Standardization of the Appropriate Doses of GA3 and Ag-Nanoparticle in Green Gram for Quality Seed Production. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research, 7(04), 1-11.
Chen, C. C. and Sungm J. M. (2001). Priming bitter gourd seeds with selenium solution enhances germinability and antioxidative responses under sub-optimal temperature. Physiol Plant 111, 9–16
Chen. D., Gunawardena, T. A., Naidu, B. P., Fukai, S. and Basnayake, J. (2005). Seed treatment with gibberellic acid and glycinebetaine improves seedling emergence and seedling vigour of rice under low temperature, Seed Sci. Technol., 33, 471–479.
Choudhury, A. and Bordolui S. K. (2022b). Inducement of Seed Priming with Potassium Nitrate on quality Performance of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(4), 779-783.
Coolbear, P., Francis, A. and Grierson, D. (1984). The effect of low-temperature pre-sowing treatment on the germination performance and membrane integrity of artificially aged tomato seeds. J. Exp. Bot., 35, 1609-1617.
Cothren, J. T., and Oosterhuis, D. M. (2010). Use of growth regulators in cotton production. In Physiology of cotton (pp. 289-303). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Ellis, R. H. and Roberts, E. H. (1980). Improved Equations for the Prediction of Seed Longevity. Annals of Botany, 45(1), 13–30.
Ghiyasi, M., Abbasi S. E., Mehdi, T., Amirnia, R. and Hojat, S. (2008). Effect of Osmopriming with Polyethylene Glycol (8000) on Germination and Seedling Growth of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seeds under Salt Stress. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3.
Kundu, E. and Bordolui, S. K. (2023). Silver Nanoparticles –mediate Seed priming Improves Germination and Physiological Performance in Carrot. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15(10), 1079-1085.
Masood, A., Iqbal, N. and Khan, N. A. (2012). Role of ethylene in alleviation of cadmium-induced capacity inhibition by sulphur in mustard. Plant Cell Environ., 35, 524–533.
Paparella, S., Araújo, S. S., Rossi, G., Wijayasinghe, M. A. L. A. K. A., Carbonera, D. and Balestrazzi, A. (2015). Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant cell reports, 34, 1281-1293.
Ray, J. and Bordolui, S. K. (2022a). Effect of seed priming as pre-treatment factors on germination and seedling vigour of tomato. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 34(20), 302-311.
Ray, J. and Bordolui, S. K. (2022b). Seed quality deterioration of tomato during storage: Effect of storing containers and condition. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(2), 137-142.
Roohi, R. and Jameson, D.A. (1991). The effect of hormone, dehulling and seedbed treatments on germination and adventitious root formation in blue grama. J. Range Manag., 44, 237–241.
Ruan, S., Xue, Q. and Tylkowska, K. (2002). Effects of priming on germination and health of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds. Seed Science and Technology, 30(2), 451-458
Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. (2006). Plant Physiology, 4th ed. Sinaur Associates Inc. Massachusetts.
Swapnadip Dandapat and Sanjoy Kumar Bordolui (2025). The Effective Use of Phytohormones for Seed Priming: A Successful Method for Improving Germination and Vigour in Rice. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 16(1): 63–67.