Author:
Bedabati Kalita1,2*, Arijit Chakraborty1 and Ajanta Dey1
Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(2): 01-13, 2025
Address:
1Nature Environment & Wildlife Society, 10, Chowringhee Terrace, Kolkata (West Bengal), India.
2Department of Environmental Biology and Wildlife Sciences, Cotton University, Guwahati (Assam), India.
(Corresponding author: Bedabati Kalita*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.2.1
The study examines the fish population and abundance in Deepor Beel, a Ramsar site in Assam, India. A total of 45 fish species were recorded, including 42 native species, 3 exotic species, and 1 each of endangered and vulnerable species. Native species predominantly belonged to the Cypriniformes and Siluriformes orders. The post-monsoon season exhibited higher Shannon diversity and species evenness compared to the monsoon season. Amblypharyngodon mola had the highest relative abundance (35.62%), while 10 species showed minimal abundance (0.0009%). Based on catch frequency, 12 species were extremely rare, 5 were rare, and 1 was abundant, with Puntius terio being the most abundant. A questionnaire survey revealed significant anthropogenic impacts on the wetland, with 69.51% of respondents reporting a decline in fish abundance. Pollution, invasive species like water hyacinth, and habitat degradation were identified as major threats. The findings underscore the need for urgent restoration and sustainable management to protect biodiversity and ecosystem services of Deepor Beel wetland.
Fish diversity, anthropogenic stressors, Deepor Beel, Assam.
Wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems, providing a wide range of environmental services, including provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting functions, which offer numerous vital benefits to both humans and wildlife (Gokce, 2019; Sofia and Nurlianti 2019). Assam wetlands are some of the most biologically diverse and productive ecosystems in India, supporting various fish species, including endemic and economically valuable ones (Bassi et al., 2014). Deepor Beel, a Ramsar Wetland, is a perennial freshwater lake and channel of the River Brahmaputra located south of the river in Kamrup District, Assam. The actual extent of Deepor Beel is 4.1 km², with its depth varying seasonally from approximately 6 m to 1.5 m (Pandit, 2016). It supports a diverse population of fish fauna and is the only major stormwater storage basin for Guwahati (Rongpi, 2024). Deepor Beel plays a crucial role in maintaining regional biodiversity. It is home to a wide variety of aquatic species and supports 200 different species of birds, including 70 migratory species (Nikita et al., 2024). Additionally, the wetlands sustain numerous reptiles, amphibians, and plant species, contributing to its reputation as a biodiversity hotspot in Assam (Saikia, 2005).
Bhattacharjya et al. (2017) reported that fish landings in the closed wetlands of the Brahmaputra Valley, Assam, were predominantly comprised of Barbs (Puntius spp.), Rasboras (Danio spp., Rasbora spp., and Devario spp.), small catfishes (Mystus spp.), Murrels (Channa spp.), Notopterus notopterus, Wallago attu, among others. Species requiring flowing waters for spawning, such as major and minor carps (Cirrhinus spp., Labeo spp.), Bagarius bagarius, Pangasius pangasius, Chitala chitala, Ompok spp., and Aspidoparia spp., were notably absent in these wetlands. They further reported that, due to the lack of significant recruitment from rivers, these habitats are primarily inhabited by fish species that spawn in stagnant waters, typically small and economically significant fishes. The natural fishery of closed wetlands is dominated (50-90%) by small economic fish species such as Puntius spp., Rasbora spp., Trichogaster spp., Mystus spp., and Notopterus notopterus. Additionally, macrophyte-choked wetlands exhibited higher abundances of insectivorous and air-breathing fishes, including Channa spp., Anabas testudineus, Clarias magur, Heteropneustes fossilis, and Notopterus notopterus. According to the RIS (Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands) report, updated in August 2002, 50 fish species were found in Deepor Beel. Saikia (2005) reported 61 fish species in Deepor Beel, of which 5 species were exotic, 54 were indigenous, and 8 were endangered. They identified species such as Cirrhinus reba, Ompok bimaculatus, Ompok pabda, Botia dario, Nandus nandus, Megarasbora elanga, Channa barca, and Brachydanio rerio during their study of Deepor Beel. While a total of 46 species from 17 families viz., Notopteridae, Clupeidae, Anabantidae, Cyprinidae, Cobitidae, Bagridae, Siluridae, Schilbeidae, Clariidae, Heteropneustidae, Synbranchidae, Chandidae, Gobiidae, Belontiidae, Channidae, Mastacembelidae, and Tetraodontidae, have been recorded in Deepor Beel by another group of researchers (Acharjee et al., 2009). Medhi et al. (2019) found the fish diversity in two other wetlands within the Brahmaputra Basin of Assam, documenting 54 fish species across 38 genera, 8 orders, and 21 families in Chatla Beel, and 52 fish species spanning 37 genera, 8 orders, and 21 families in Urmal Beel. The order Cypriniformes was the most dominant in both wetlands, represented by 23 species in Chatla Beel and 22 species in Urmal Beel.
However, during the past few years, numerous studies have highlighted the threats wetlands face globally due to anthropogenic stressors (Nath and Deka 2012; Sultana et al., 2017; Kumar et al., 2018; Butt et al., 2021). Baruah and Goswami (2022) highlighted that the only Ramsar site of Assam, Deepor Beel is struggling to survive due to human interventions, unchecked pollution, and the violation of critical environmental regulations. The severe pollution of this vital water body has caused adversely impacts biodiversity, ecological balance, and threat to the local livelihoods of the communities. Rongpi (2024) reported that rapid urban development is putting the wetland and its ecosystem at risk of shrinking. Additionally, the establishment of the city's garbage disposal center in the Boragaon area has significantly polluted the waters of Deepor Beel and threatening the biodiversity of the wetland. The deterioration and overexploitation of wetlands reduce their ability to support life and provide essential services. The Ramsar Convention was established to combat wetland loss through global cooperation and promote sustainable development. Despite efforts to raise awareness, wetlands continue to face rapid decline due to overexploitation (Daryadel and Talaei 2014). Duarah and Das (2019) reported that fish diversity of the wetlands are under tremendous threats due to environmental degradation and its associated problems. Unsustainable land-use practices and development activities are placing tremendous pressure on Deepor Beel (Saikia, 2019). Fish production in the wetland is rapidly declining due to siltation, the dumping of solid waste, and the release of hazardous chemicals through inlet channels. These factors have considerably reduced the wetland's carrying capacity, causing many fishermen's families to lose their livelihoods. Bhattacharjya et al. (2021) also documented a decline in fish species due to threats faced by Deepor Beel and emphasized possible conservation strategies, such as regulating pollution, preventing/control of siltation, enacting and enforcing appropriate legislation, and other related conservation measures.
Over time, anthropogenic activities have caused the area of the wetland to shrink. Deka et al. (2011) on the monitoring of spatial changes in Deepor Beel indicated that the total area of open water bodies diminished by 2.904 sq. km from 1991 to 2010. Mandal et al. (2024) reported an increase in built-up areas around Deepor Beel, from 9.07 to 32.19 sq. km between 2008 and 2018, with increasing built-up areas within a 500-meter buffer of the wetland. A study on the estimation of water pixel frequency from 1988 to 2019 revealed that the aerial extent of high, moderate, and low-frequency water presence areas were approximately 4.81, 3.48, and 2.76 km², respectively, from 1988 to 2000. From 2001 to 2018, the rapid expansion of the railway network further reduced the wetland area by about 58%, 33%, and 52% in high, moderate, and low water presence frequency zones, respectively (Das et al., 2024). The Beel is gradually converting from swamp to grassland. Its ability to absorb floodwaters has decreased, resulting in artificial waterlogging throughout the city. The wetland's self-purification capacity is also compromised due to pollution. Moreover, water quality in most areas of Deepor Beel was found to be in poor condition, a critical factor for fish diversity (Roy and Majumder 2022; Das et al., 2024; Sharma et al., 2024). The water quality has deteriorated due to the release of pollutants from several industries and waste disposal sites. Recent studies have revealed significant quantities of heavy and trace metals, which threaten the aquatic flora and fauna diversity, while lower dissolved oxygen levels in the Beel put aquatic life in a hypoxic state (Fatima et al., 2020; Sengupta and Deb 2022).
Bhattacharjya et al. (2017) emphasized that the scientific management of floodplain wetlands could significantly enhance fish production. These wetlands, often transitioning to marshlands, provide critical habitats for migratory and resident species, while supporting diverse aquatic flora and fauna, including plankton, macrophytes, benthic organisms, and various macrophyte-associated species. They are also vital for conserving threatened air-breathing and small-sized fish species. Fish act as an indicator species, regulating the distribution and abundance of other organisms within their ecosystems. They also serve as key indicators of water quality and overall ecosystem health (Moyle and Leidy 1992; Nath et al., 2015; Malakar and Boruah 2017; Mamun and An 2022). Studies on relationship of anthropogenic activities and the abundance of fish species can clarify the overall wetland health and its associated ecosystems. However, limited studies exist on the current fish diversity of Deepor Beel and the possible anthropogenic stresses that affect fish abundance. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the current status of fish populations and abundance in Deepor Beel, along with an exploration of possible anthropogenic stresses that have impacted the fish diversity, utilizing a questionnaire survey based on the perceptions of the 'sons of the soil'.
Study area. The study was conducted in the Deepor Beel, Assam, India that located in lower Brahmaputra valley zone of Assam. Deepor Beel, is a large natural freshwater wetland situated southwest of Brahmaputra River near Guwahati City and is recognized as a Ramsar site. It extends between 26⁰03′26″ and 26⁰09′26″ N to 90⁰36′39″ 90⁰41′25″ E. The fish markets selected for fish sampling during the study are located near Deepor Beel. The market survey was carried out directly from local fish markets and from fishermen in the Deepor Beel fish market and Godhuli Bazar at Azara.
Sampling methods. The fishermen employed various fishing gears, including gill nets (with different mesh sizes), drag nets (fry nets), and hook and line. Sampling at the fish markets in Godhuli Bazar and the Deepor Beel area took place in the morning between 7:00 AM and 9:30 AM from July-November, 2024. Fish samples were identified based on their morphometric and meristic characteristics. Each species was categorized according to its respective IUCN Red List status (2024). The relative abundance of each fish species (% of the catch) was calculated using the method outlined by Sarkar et al. (2012), applying the following formula:
The frequency of occurrence of each species was calculated based on the number of occasions the species was collected during the samplings. The status was determined with the help of a standard catch frequency chart presented by Tamang et al. (2007) (Catch frequency: 91–100 % = Common, 81–90 % = Abundant, 61–80 % = Frequent, 31–59 % = Occasional, 15–30 % = Sporadic, 05–14 % = Rare, Less than 5% = extremely rare).
Shannon-Weinner index and species evenness was calculated by following May, (1993) and used following diversity indices:
Shannon-Weinner Index H = -{ni/N log2 ni/N}
Where N = Total species and ni = Numbers of individual species
The species evenness ratio is the ratio of the observed species diversity (H’) to the maximum possible for the same number of species in the sample (log S).
It is expressed as: J’=H’/log S. If J’=1, the biomasses of the individual species are evenly distributed among all of the species in the sample
A questionnaire survey was conducted to analyze the anthropogenic activities that influence the health of fish diversity in Deepor Beel. The sample questions of the questionnaire are furnished in Table 1. Random sampling was conducted and a total of 15 fishermen from each village were surveyed, making a total of 165 fishermen.
Table 1: Questionnaire format used during the survey at Deepor Beel area, Assam.
Date: Location: GPS coordinates:
(I) General details:
Name of respondent: Contact number:
Gender (male/female)
Age (yrs):
Fishing experience (yrs):
(II) Anthropogenic climate change perception/belief:
Do you feel any change in climate over the last 10-20 years: Yes/No/Can’t say
(III) What anthropogenic activities influences fish diversity
a) Developmental activities: most/moderate/low
b) Waste dumping site: most/moderate/low
c) Invasive species: most/moderate/low
(IV) Anthropogenic influences on fish diversity:
Abundance change: increase/moderate/decrease
Taste change: Yes/No/can’t say
(V) Details of fishes found: Indigenous/exotic
(VI) Livelihood of fishermen: fishing/ others/both
Any shift in livelihood (from fishery to others or vice versa)? Yes/No
If yes, reason for shift:
Fish diversity. In the present study, a total of 107875 fish individuals belonging to 45 species, representing 11 orders (one order is not assigned) and 22 families, were recorded from the Deepor Beel wetland (Table 2, Fig. 1). Photographs of the fish species recorded during the present study are presented in Plate I. Literature surveys revealed that more than 60 fish species were present in the Deepor Beel (Saikia, 2005; Bhattacharjya et al., 2021). Present study included 42 native species and three exotic species (Fig. 2) viz., Piaractus brachypomus from the order Characiformes and family Serrasalmidae, and Cyprinus carpio, belonging to the order Cypriniformes and family Cyprinidae, and Oreochromis mossambicus under the order Cichliformes and family Cichlidae (Table 3). These exotic species are known for their rapid growth and ability to consume a wide variety of foods from various sources, including sometimes the juveniles of other fish species (Erarto and Getahun 2020). Some fish culturists have introduced these species to achieve quick economic returns. During floods, these species can escape from ponds and enter into Beels and rivers, posing a significant threat to native fish species and natural water bodies. The relative abundance (%) of fish species identified during the survey is detailed in Table 3. Among the fish species, Amblypharyngodon mola was found with more relative abundance (35.62%) and 10 fish species were found with lower relative abundances (0.0009%) in the Deepor Beel. Based on Tamang et al., (2007) catch frequency status, the survey categorized 12 fish species as extremely rare, 5 as rare, 5 as sporadic, 15 as occasional, 7 as frequent, and 1 as abundant. The study concluded that, although a moderate number of fish species were found, their catch frequency status raises significant concerns. Several species, such as Mystus cavasius, Rita rita, Sperata seenghala, Pachypterus atherinoides, Pangasius pangasius from the Siluriformes order, Xenentodon cancila from the Beloniformes order, Chitala chitala from the Osteoglossiformes order, Channa gachua from the Anabantiformes order, Lepidocephalichthys guntea from the Cypriniformes order, and Mastacembelus armatus from the Synbranchiformes order were observed at lower levels of relative abundance during the study period. However, Puntius terio species belonging to the family Cypriniformes were found abundant, and Mystus tengara, Heteropneustes fossilis from Siluriformes order, Gudusia chapra from Clupeiformes order, Channa punctata from Anabantiformes order Macrognathus pancalus from Synbranchiformes order and Notopterus notopterus from Osteoglossiformes order were found frequent during the study period in Deepor Beel (Table 3). Fishermen reported that species such as the Zig-zag eel, Corsula, Gangetic leaf fish, Flying barb, Mottled loach, Bengal loach, Pabo catfish, Freshwater garfish, and some of the Puntius species have not been found abundantly and have gradually declined in recent years. Malakar and Boruah (2017) reported that the uncontrolled harvesting of brood and juvenile fish, combined with the overexploitation of commercially important local species during the breeding season, is leading to a notable decline in fish diversity in several other wetlands of Assam, including Sol Beel, Etila Beel, and Duani Beel. In the current survey, the fish species Nandus nandus, Leiodon cutcutia, and Ompok pabda were notably absent. This absence could be attributed to a decline in their population or perhaps seasonal fluctuations, as the survey was conducted across only two seasons. Most of the native fish species obtained during the survey belonged to the Cypriniformes and Siluriformes orders (Fig. 1). The contribution of fish species by order and family is detailed in Table 1 and illustrated in Fig. 1. The present study found the Cyprinidae family to be most abundant among the recorded fish families (Table 2), aligning with the findings of Nikita et al. (2024) who utilized an eDNA approach to study fish diversity in Deepor Beel. The IUCN Red List status of the fish species recorded in this survey is shown in Fig. 3. Most species were classified as Least Concern (LC), while one species, Wallago attu from Siluriformes order was found to be Vulnerable (VU), Clarias magur from Siluriformes order was found to be endangered and another species Chitala chitala from Osteoglossiformes order was found to be Near Threatened (NT).
Table 2: Order and family-wise fish species contribution recorded during the present study from Deepor Beel, Assam, India.
Order | Family | Species | Order wise species contributions |
Anabantiformes | Anabantidae | 1 | 7 |
Channidae | 4 | ||
Osphronemidae | 2 | ||
Beloniformes | Belonidae | 1 | 1 |
Characiformes | Serrasalmidae | 1 | 1 |
Clupeiformes | Dorosomatidae | 1 | 1 |
Cypriniformes | Botiidae | 1 | 18 |
Cyprinidae | 13 | ||
Danionidae | 3 | ||
Cobitidae | 1 | ||
Osteoglossiformes | Notopteridae | 2 | 2 |
Siluriformes | Bagridae | 4 | 9 |
Heteropneustidae | 1 | ||
Siluridae | 1 | ||
Clariidae | 1 | ||
Schilbeidae | 1 | ||
Pangasiidae | 1 | ||
Synbrachiformes | Synbranchidae | 1 | 3 |
Mastacembelidae | 2 | ||
Cichliformes | Cichlidae | 1 | 1 |
Gobiiformes | Gobiidae | 1 | 1 |
Not assigned | Ambassidae | 2 | 2 |
Total species= 45 | |||
Source: field survey (July-November, 2024)
The study identified one endangered, one vulnerable and one near-threatened fish species, and emphasizes the urgent need for conservation efforts to protect the wetland and its associated faunal diversity. Although most fish species were classified as being of least concern, their low relative abundance raises urgent concerns about the conservation of indigenous fish, which is essential for maintaining the health of the wetland ecosystem. Nayak and Biswas (2020) underscored that ecological restorations of the wetlands are very crucial to conserve the indigenous fishes of Assam. The present study showed Shannon diversity index and species evenness of fish species in monsoon and post-monsoon seasons (Table 4). The post-monsoon season showed higher Shannon diversity and species evenness in comparison to monsoon season during the survey period, which might be due to the favorable environment for their growth and movement that increases the fish diversity in the Deepor Beel. In the post-monsoon season, there may be favorable water conditions that allow fish populations to flourish, attracting both resident and migratory species from Brahmaputra river, which boosts overall fish diversity. In monsoon season, heavy rains bring an influx of nutrients into freshwater bodies like rivers, and lakes. This nutrient enrichment supports the growth of phytoplankton and other primary producers, creating a more productive environment that promotes food availability for fish species (Madhupratap et al., 2001; Sreekanth et al., 2019). In the post-monsoon season, the lower rate of surface runoff and evaporation support higher species diversity (Saha et al., 2021). Monsoon rains causes fluctuations in water levels, which can lead to changes in water parameters, including pH, TDS levels that may be stressful for some fish species or may temporarily reduce the diversity (Sreekanth et al., 2019; Saha et al., 2021).
Fig. 1. Order-wise family and species distribution of fish recorded during the study in Deepor Beel, Assam, India.
Fig. 2. Graphical representation of categories of fish species found during the survey in Deepor Beel, Assam, India.
Table 3: Details of the fish species recorded during present study in Deepor Beel, Assam, India.
Sr. No. | Species | Order | Family | Common name | Vernacular name | Catching frequency (%) | Status | Relative abundances (%) | IUCN red list status |
1 | Anabas cobojius (Hamilton, 1822) | Anabantiformes | Anabantidae | Gangetic Koi | Kawaoi | 50 | Occasional | 0.246 | DD |
2 | Channa marulius (Hamilton, 1822) | Channidae | Great snakehead | Shaal | 11.90 | Rare | 0.007 | LC | |
3 | Channa punctata (Bloch, 1793) | Spotted snakehead | Goroi | 73.81 | Frequent | 1.283 | LC | ||
4 | Channa striata (Bloch, 1793) | Stripped snakehead | Sol | 14.29 | Rare | 0.011 | LC | ||
5 | Channa gachua (Bloch & Schneider 1801) | Walking snakehead | Chengali | 7.14 | Rare | 0.007 | LC | ||
6 | Trichogaster bejeus (Hamilton, 1822) (formerly Trichogaster fasciata) | Osphronemidae | Banded gourami | Kholihona | 54.76 | Occasional | 0.596 | LC | |
7 | Trichogaster fasciata (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (formerly Trichogaster lalia) | Dwarf gourami | Kholihona | 23.81 | Sporadic | 0.058 | LC | ||
8 | Xenentodon cancila (Hamilton, 1822) | Beloniformes | Belonidae | Freshwater garfish | Kokila | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | LC |
9 | Piaractus brachypomus (Cuvier, 1818)* | Characiformes | Serrasalmidae | Red-Bellied Pacu | Rupchanda | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | |
10 | Gudusia chapra (Hamilton, 1822) | Clupeiformes | Dorosomatidae | Indian river shad | Koroti | 76.19 | Frequent | 5.054 | LC |
11 | Botiadario (Hamilton, 1822) | Cypriniformes | Botiidae | Bengal loach | Gethu | 11.90 | Rare | 0.005 | LC |
12 | Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822) | Cyprinidae | Mrigal | Mirika | 26.19 | Sporadic | 0.025 | LC | |
13 | Cirrhinusreba (Hamilton, 1822) | Reba carp | Lachim | 40.48 | Occasional | 1.345 | LC | ||
14 | Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)* | Common carp | Common carp | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | |||
15 | Labeo bata (Hamilton, 1822) | Bata | Bhagun | 28.57 | Sporadic | 0.296 | LC | ||
16 | Labeo calbasu (Hamilton, 1822) | Orangefinlabeo | Kalbasu | 59/52 | Occasional | 0.319 | LC | ||
17 | Labeo catla (Hamilton, 1822) | Catla | Bhokuwa | 33.33 | Occasional | 0.054 | LC | ||
18 | Labeo gonius (Hamilton, 1822) | Kurialabeo | Kurhi | 33.33 | Occasional | 0.051 | LC | ||
19 | Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) | Rohu | Rohu | 50.00 | Occasional | 0.112 | LC | ||
20 | Osteobrama cotio (Hamilton, 1822) | Cotio | Hafu mash | 52.38 | Occasional | 0.522 | LC | ||
21 | Puntius sophore (Hamilton, 1822) | Pool barb | Puthi | 61.90 | Frequent | 4.914 | LC | ||
22 | Puntius terio (Hamilton, 1822) | One spot barb | Puthi | 88.10 | Abundant | 10.651 | LC | ||
23 | Esomus danricus (Hamilton, 1822) | Flying barb | Dorikona | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.002 | LC | ||
24 | Bangana dero (Hamilton, 1822) | Kalabans | Narowa | 40.48 | Occasional | 0.024 | LC | ||
25 | Amblypharyngodon mola (Hamilton, 1822) | Danionidae | Molacarplet | Mowa | 38.10 | Occasional | 35.616 | LC | |
26 | Salmostoma bacaila (Hamilton, 1822) | Large razorbelly minnow | Selkana, Chela | 38.10 | Occasional | 0.127 | LC | ||
27 | Lepidocephalichthys guntea (Hamilton, 1822) | Cobitidae | Guntea loach | Botia | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | LC | |
28 | Chanda nama (Hamilton, 1822) | Not assigned (formerly classified in the order Perciformes) | Ambassidae | Elongate glass-perchlet | Chanda | 57.14 | Occasional | 30.677 | LC |
29 | Parambassis lala (Hamilton, 1822) | Highfin glassy perchlet | Chanda | 38.10 | Occasional | 0.461 | LC | ||
30 | Notopterus notopterus (Pallas, 1769) | Osteoglossiformes | Notopteridae | Bronze featherback | Kandhuli | 66.67 | Frequent | 0.160 | LC |
31 | Chitala chitala (Hamilton, 1822) | Clown knifefish | Citol | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | NT | ||
32 | Mystus cavasius (Hamilton, 1822) | Siluriformes | Bagridae | Gangeticmystus | Bar singora, Gulsa | 19.05 | Sporadic | 0.054 | LC |
33 | Mystus tengara (Hamilton, 1822) | Tengara catfish | Singora, Tengna | 78.57 | Frequent | 3.253 | LC | ||
34 | Rita rita (Hamilton, 1822) | Rita | Ritha | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | LC | ||
35 | Sperata seenghala (Sykes, 1839) | Giant river-catfish | Aari | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | LC | ||
36 | Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch, 1794) | Heteropneustidae | Stinging catfish | Singi | 76.19 | Frequent | 2.086 | LC | |
37 | Wallago attu (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) | Siluridae | Wallago | Borali | 35.71 | Occasional | 0.047 | VU | |
38 | Clarias magur (Hamilton, 1822) | Clariidae | Walking catfish | Magur | 11.90 | Rare | 0.019 | EN | |
39 | Pachypterus atherinoides (Bloch, 1794) | Schilbeidae | Indian potasi | Bordia | 4.76 | Extremely rare | 0.002 | LC | |
40 | Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton, 1822) | Pangasiidae | Pangas catfish | Basa | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | LC | |
41 | Ophichthys cuchia (Hamilton, 1822) | Synbrachiformes | Synbranchidae | Gangaticmudeel | Cuchia | 35.71 | Occasional | 0.779 | LC |
42 | Macrognathus pancalus (Hamilton, 1822) | Mastacembelidae | Barred spiny eel | Turi | 69.05 | Frequent | 1.102 | LC | |
43 | Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepède, 1800) | Zig zag eel | Bami | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | LC | ||
44 | Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters, 1852)* | Cichliformes | Cichlidae | Tilapia | Japanikawoi | 2.38 | Extremely rare | 0.001 | |
45 | Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton, 1822) | Gobiiformes | Gobiidae | Tank goby | Patitmutura | 28.57 | Sporadic | 0.020 | LC |
* Exotic species; EN: Endangered; VU: Vulnerable; NT: Near Threatened; LC: Least Concern; DD: Data Deficient
Fig. 3. Graphical representation of the IUCN Red List status of fishes found during the survey in Deepor Beel, Assam, India.
Table 4: Diversity of fish species at Deepor Beel in the study period (July-November).
Monsoon (July-September) | Post-monsoon (October-November) | Study period (July-November) | |
Shannon-Weiner index | 1.52 | 1.84 | 1.86 |
Species evenness | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.49 |
Source: field survey (July-November, 2024)
Table 5: Social parameters of the fishermen in the study area at Deepor Beel, Assam, India.
Variables | Categories | Numbers of respondents |
Gender (%) | Male | 81.10 |
Female | 18.90 | |
Age (yrs) | Average | 48.46 |
20-40 | 47 | |
41-60 | 101 | |
61-80 | 16 | |
Experience (yrs) | Average | 33.46 |
5-25 | 47 | |
26-45 | 101 | |
46-55 | 16 | |
Livelihood (%) | Fishing | 3.03 |
Fishing+ Others | 96.97 |
Source: field survey (July-November, 2024)
Table 6: Percentage distributions of fishermen’ responses related to fish species diversity in Deepor Beel, Assam, India.
Variables | Categories | Percentage of responses |
Fish species abundances | Increase | 0% |
Moderate | 30.49% | |
Decrease | 69.51% | |
Taste changed | Yes | 83.54 % |
No | 0% | |
Can’t say | 16.46% |
Source: field survey (July-November, 2024)
Fig. 4. Percentage distributions of the respondents on studied anthropogenic activities recorded during the study period (July-November, 2024) in Deepor Beel, Assam, India.
Plate I: Fish species found during the survey in Deepor Beel, Assam. 1. Osteobrama cotio, 2. Labeo bata, 3. Salmostoma bacaila, 4. Anabas cobojius, 5.Trichogaster fasciata, 6. Trichogasterbejeus, 7. Labeo calbasu, 8. Labeo rohita, 9. Puntius sophore, 10. Puntiusterio, 11. Parambassis lala, 12. Chandanama, 13. Botia Dario, 14. Cirrhinusreba, 15. Amblypharyngodon mola, 16. Ophichthys cuchia, 17. Xenentodon cancila, 18. Macrognathus pancalus, 19. Mystus tengara, 20. Mystus cavasius, 21. Esomus danricus, 22. Gudusia chapra, 23. Heteropneustes fossilis, 24. Labeo gonius, 25. Sperata seenghala, 26. Cirrhinus mrigala, 27. Rita rita, 28. Channamarulius, 29. Channa punctata, 30. Labeocatla, 31. Pachypterus atherinoides, 32. Glossogobius giuris, 33. Lepidocephalichthys guntea, 34. Mastacembelus armatus, 35. Banganadero, 36. Pangasius pangasius, 37. Notopterus notopterus, 38. Chitala chitala, 39. Wallago attu, 40. Channa gachua, 41. Channa striata, 42. Clarias magur, 43. Piaractus brachypomus, 44. Cyprinus carpio, 45. Oreochromis mossambicus.
Future research should focus on comprehensive water quality parameter testing, to better understand how water degradation impacts fish health and biodiversity in Deepor Beel. Additionally, longitudinal studies on fish population dynamics and the effects of anthropogenic activities, such as pollution and habitat destruction, are crucial to identifying specific threats to the wetland's ecosystem. Exploring the effectiveness of conservation strategies, including habitat restoration and sustainable fishing practices, will be vital for ensuring the long-term sustainability of the fish populations and the socio-economic and cultural heritage of local communities. These efforts will provide a deeper understanding of the causes of habitat degradation and guide more effective management and restoration practices for Deepor Beel.
Acharjee, B., Dutta, A., Sharma, D. K., Das, P., Behera, B. K. and Kosygin, L. (2009). Ecological status of Deepor Beel, Assam with special reference to its fish and fisheries. Ecology, Aquatic Bio-resources and conservation of wetlands of North east India, Akansha Publishing House, New Delhi, India pp. 41-54.
Ballut-Dajud, G. A., Sandoval Herazo, L. C., Fernández-Lambert, G., Marín-Muñiz, J. L., López Méndez, M. C. and Betanzo-Torres, E. A. (2022). Factors affecting wetland loss: A review. Land, 11(3), 434.
Baruah, D. and Goswami, K. (2022). Efficacy of legal institutions in protecting Assam’s Ramsar site: assessing waste pollution in Deepor Beel through the legal lens, NLUA Law & Policy Review, 7, 55-89.
Basaula, R., Sharma, H. P., Paudel, B. R., Kunwar, P. S. and Sapkota, K. (2023). Effects of invasive water hyacinth on fish diversity and abundance in the Lake Cluster of Pokhara Valley, Nepal. Global Ecology and Conservation, 46, e02565.
Bassi, N., Kumar, M. D., Sharma, A. and Pardha-Saradhi, P. (2014). Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2, 1-19.
Bhattacharjya, B. K., Bhaumik, U. and Sharma, A. P. (2017). Fish habitat and fisheries of Brahmaputra River in Assam, India. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 20(1-2), 102-115.
Bhattacharjya, B. K., Saud, B. J., Borah, S., Saikia, P. K. and Das, B. K. (2021). Status of biodiversity and limno-chemistry of Deepor Beel, a Ramsar site of international importance: Conservation needs and the way forward. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 24(4), 64-74.
Butt, M. A., Zafar, M., Ahmed, M., Shaheen, S. and Sultana, S. (2021). Wetland and Wetland Plants. In: Wetland Plants Springer Nature, p. 1-15.
Chawla, H., Singh, S. K. and Haritash, A. K. (2024). Reversing the damage: ecological restoration of polluted water bodies affected by pollutants due to anthropogenic activities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(1), 127-143.
Daryadel, E. and Talaei, F. (2014). Analytical study on threats to wetland ecosystems and their solutions in the Framework of the Ramsar Convention. International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 8(7), 2108-2118.
Das, P., Mandal, S. C., Bhagabati, S. K., Akhtar, M. S. and Singh, S. K. (2012). Important live food organisms and their role in aquaculture. Frontiers in aquaculture, 5(4), 69-86.
Das, R. T., Dutta, M. N. and Acharjee, S. (2024). Water Quality Assessment by Using Landsat Images in Urban Wetland: A Case Study of Deepor Beel, Assam. (Eds. Talukdar, S., Rahman, A., Bera, S., Ramana, G.V., Prashar, A.) Environmental Risk and Resilience in the Changing World: Integrated Geospatial AI and Multidimensional Approach Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, p. 149-163.
Datta, S., Sinha, D., Chaudhary, V., Kar, S. and Singh, A. (2022). Water pollution of wetlands: a global threat to inland, wetland, and aquatic phytodiversity. Handbook of research on monitoring and evaluating the ecological health of wetlands. IGI Global, pp. 27-50.
Deka, J., Tripathi, O. P. and Khan, M. L. (2011). A multi-temporal remote sensing approach for monitoring changes in spatial extent of freshwater lake of Deepor Beel Ramsar Site, a major wetland of Assam. Journal of Wetlands Ecology, 5, 40-47.
Duarah, P. and Das, K. (2019). Diversity of small indigenous Freshwater Fish Species (SIFs) in Assam; Nutritional contents and medicinal importance: A review. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 10(2), 357-361.
Ekka, A., Karnatak, G., Roy, A. and Pandit, A. (2024). Sustaining Livelihoods and Nourishing Economies: The Invaluable Contributions of Indigenous Small Fish to India’s Economic Tapestry. (Eds. Sinha, A., Roy, A., Gogoi, P.) Perspectives and Applications of Indigenous Small Fish in India: An Introduction. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, p. 541-552.
Erarto, F. and Getahun, A. (2020). Impacts of introductions of alien species with emphasis on fishes. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 8, 207-216.
Fatima, S., Muzammal, M., Rehman, A., Rustam, S. A., Shehzadi, Z., Mehmood, A. and Waqar, M. (2020). Water pollution on heavy metals and its effects on fishes. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 8(3), 6-14.
Getahun, S. and Kefale, H. (2023). Problem of Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)) in Lake Tana (Ethiopia): Ecological, Economic, and Social Implications and Management Options. International Journal of Ecology, 1-8.
Ghosh, S., Anju, P., Pattanayak, R. and Sahu, N. C. (2024). Fisheries and Aquaculture in Wetland Ecosystems: A Review of Benefits, Risks, and Future Prospects in India. Journal of Coastal Research, 40(3), 598-612.
Gogoi, B., Kachari, A., Dutta, R., Darshan, A. and Narayan, D. (2015). Fishery based livelihood approaches and management of fishery resources in Assam, India. Forest, 5(501), 2-514.
Gohain, S. B. and Bordoloi, S. (2021). Impact of municipal solid waste disposal on the surface water and sediment of adjoining wetland Deepor Beel in Guwahati, Assam, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(5), 278.
Gokce, D. (2019). Introductory chapter: Wetland importance and management. Wetlands management–Assessing risk and sustainable solutions, pp. 3-10.
Hoque, N. A. and Sharma, A. (2020). Sustainable management and farmer’s willingness to participate: a case study of Deepor Beel. Ecology Environment and Conservation, 26(4), 1806-1815.
Kırım, B., Çoban, D. and Güler, M. (2014). Floating aquatic plants and their impact on wetlands in Turkey. In 2nd International Conference-Water resources and wetlands. Tulcea, Romania.
Kumar, B., Kumar, S., Biswal, A., Dey, A., Thakuria, J., Hussan, A., Baruah, A., Udit, U. K., Meher, P. K. and Singh, D. K. (2018). Present status, abundance and threats of fish diversity on Ramsar site (East Kolkata Wetlands) of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(7), 4000-4007.
Madhupratap, M., Nair, K. N. V., Gopalakrishnan, T. C., Haridas, P., Nair, K. K. C., Venugopal, P. and Gauns, M. (2001). Arabian Sea oceanography and fisheries of the west coast of India. Current Science, 81(4), 355-361.
Maibam, S., Ngasepam, R. S., Ningthoukhongjam, I. D., Chabungbam, B. D., Ranibala, T. and Kar, D. (2015). Check list of fish species of Loktak Lake Bishnupur district. Biological Forum-An International Journal, 7(1), 171-179.
Malakar, M. and Boruah, S. (2017). Diversity and Present Status of Fish Species in Three Floodplain Wetlands of Central Assam, India. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 11(1), 54-59.
Mamun, M. and An, K. G. (2022). Key factors determining water quality, fish community dynamics, and the ecological health in an Asian temperate lotic system. Ecological Informatics, 72, 101890.
Mandal, S., Chakraborty, K. and Dutta, B. K. (2024). Evaluation of the influence of land-use and land-cover changes on ecosystem services in Deepor Beel Ramsar Site using high resolution remote sensing. Current Science, 126(9), 1159.
May, R. M. (1993). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. (Ed. Cody JM) Ecology and Evolution of Communities Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press. Solow AR. A simple test for change in community structure. Journal of Animal Ecology, 62, 191-193.
Medhi, K., Tamilarasan, N., Bhattacharjya, B. K., Bhushan, S., Kakati, A., Borah, S., Mallik, A. and Das, B. K. (2019). An inventory on the freshwater fish diversity of two tropical flood plain wetlands of Brahmaputra Basin, Assam, India. Journal of Experimental Zoology India, 22(2), 1243-1251.
Moyle, P. B. and Leidy, R. A. (1992). Loss of biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems: evidence from fish faunas (Eds. Fiedler, P.L., Jain, S.K.) Conservation biology: The theory and practice of nature conservation preservation and management, Boston, MA: Springer US, p. 127-169.
Nath, B. and Deka, C. (2012). A study on fish diversity, conservation status and anthropogenic stress of Chandubi tectonic lake, Assam, India. Journal of Bio Innovation, 1(6), 148-155.
Nath, M., Ngasepam, R. S., Das, B. K., Dutta, B., Das, U., Das, P., Kar, S. and Kar, D. (2015). A preliminary study on fish diversity of Kakri and Deo River around Dharmanagar in Tripura. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 6.
Nayak, N. and Biswas, S. P. (2020). Wetland shrinkage: A threat to the indigenous fish population of Assam. NeBIO, 11(1), 7-8.
Nikita, R., Ghosh, A., Kumar, C., Mandal, A., Saini, N., Dubey, S. K., Gogoi, K., Rajts, F., Belton, B. and Bhadury, P. (2024). Dataset of biological community structure in Deepor Beel using eDNA approach–A RAMSAR wetland of Assam, India. Data in Brief, 52, 109786.
Niu, L., Zou, G., Guo, Y., Li, Y., Wang, C., Hu, Q., Zhang W. and Wang, L. (2022). Eutrophication dangers the ecological status of coastal wetlands: A quantitative assessment by composite microbial index of biotic integrity. Science of the Total Environment, 816, 151620.
Oh, J. W., Pushparaj, S. S. C., Muthu, M. and Gopal, J. (2023). Review of Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) Causing Marine Fish Kills: Toxicity and Mitigation. Plants, 12(23), 3936.
Omondi, A. and Merceline, A. (2023). Invasive Species and their Impacts on the Ecology of Lake Victoria: A Rapid Review. Pan Africa Science Journal, 3(02).
Pandit, S. (2016). Transformation of Urban Wetlands As An Effect of Urban Development: An Analysis of Deepor Beel in Guwahati, Assam. Creative Space, 4(1), 103-114.
RIS (2002). Ramsar Site Information Service, Deepor Beel. https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1207
Rongpi, S. (2024). Significance of Ramsar Site and Its Conservation: An Analysis of Deepor Beel in Assam, India. International Journal of Legal Studies and Social Sciences, 2(4), 81-90.
Roy, R. and Majumder, M. (2022). Assessment of water quality trends in Deepor Beel, Assam, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(12), 14327-14347.
Saha, D., Saha, A. and Saha, N. C. (2021). Seasonal Variation of Water Quality and Its Impact on Fish Diversity in Harabhanga Abandoned Open Castpit, Raniganj Coalfield, West Bengal, India. Advances in Bioresearch, 12(2), 128-134.
Saikia, P. K. (2005). Qualitative and quantitative study of lower and higher organisms and their functional role in the Deepor Beel ecosystem. Project report submitted to North Eastern Space Applications Centre (NESAC), Department of Space, Government of India, Umium, Meghalaya, Shillong, pp. 1-97.
Saikia, J. L. (2019). Deepor Beel wetland: Threats to ecosystem services, their importance to dependent communities and possible management measure. Natural Resources and Conservation, 7(2), 9-24.
San Diego-McGlone, M. L., Yñiguez, A. T., Benico, G., Lum, W. M., Hii, K. S., Leong, S. C. Y., Leaw, C. P., Iwataki, M. and Lim, P. T. (2024). Fish kills related to harmful algal bloom events in Southeast Asia. Sustainability, 16(23), 10521.
Sánchez-Carrillo, S., Angeler, D. G., Álvarez-Cobelas, M. and Sánchez-Andrés, R. (2011). Freshwater wetland eutrophication. Eutrophication: causes, consequences and control, 195-210.
Sarkar, U. K., Pathak, A. K., Sinha, R. K., Sivakumar, K., Pandian, A. K., Pandey, A., Dubey, V. K. and Lakra, W. S. (2012). Freshwater fish biodiversity in the River Ganga (India): changing pattern, threats and conservation perspectives. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 22, 251-272.
Segbefia, A. Y., Honlah, E. and Appiah, D. O. (2019). Effects of water hyacinth invasion on sustainability of fishing livelihoods along the River Tano and Abby-Tano Lagoon, Ghana. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5(1), 1654649.
Sengupta, P. and Deb, S. R. (2022). Assessing the Impact of Urbanization on Deepor Beel: A Review. GI Science for the Sustainable Management of Water Resources, 369-383.
Sharma, P., Sarkar, R., Deka, J. P., Koley, S. and Saha, B. (2024). Assessing water quality of Deepor Beel, Assam, NE India, using water quality index: a case of Ramsar wetland. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 17(1), 20.
Sinha, A., Gogoi, P. and Damroy, S. (2024). Small Indigenous Fish (SIF): Status and Contributions in Nutrition and Livelihood Security of India: A Review. Agricultural Reviews, 45(1).
Sofia, L. A. and Nurlianti, S. (2019). The economic value of the resource utilization of wetlands: comparative study of beje fisheries in North Hulu, Sungai Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux, 12, 143-150.
Sreekanth, G. B., Jaiswar, A. K., Zacharia, P. U., Pazhayamadom, D. G. and Chakraborty, S. K. (2019). Effect of environment on spatio-temporal structuring of fish assemblages in a monsoon-influenced tropical estuary. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191, 1-27.
Sultana, A., Sarker, A. C., Kunda, M. and Mazumder, S. K. (2017). Present status and threats to fish diversity of wetlands of Chhatak, Bangladesh. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 5(5), 43-48.
Tamang, L. A. K. P. A., Chaudhry, S. H. I. V. A. J. I. and Choudhury, D. H. R. U. P. A. D. (2007). Ichthyofaunal contribution to the state and comparison of habitat contiguity on taxonomic diversity in Senkhi stream, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 104(2), 170-177.
Villamagna, A. M. and Murphy, B. R. (2010). Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a review. Freshwater biology, 55(2).
Vyas, V. and Vishwakarma, K. S. (2013). Study on ichthyofaunal diversity of Jammer river: A tributary of Narmada river. International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 5(2), 84-89.
Bedabati Kalita, Arijit Chakraborty and Ajanta Dey (2025). A Study on the Present Status of Fish Population, Abundance, and Anthropogenic Stressors Affecting the Ichthyofaunal Diversity in Deepor Beel, Assam, India. Biological Forum, 17(2): 01-13.