Antibiotic Resistance Profile and Biofilm-forming Ability of E. coli and Non-Typhoidal Salmonella spp. from Dairy Cattle Farm settings: A Public Health Concern

Author:

Dias Marita1, Vinod Valil Kunjukunju1*, Bibin Mohan1, Moonnamthodi Moosarikkal Reshma2, Padikkamannil Abishad1, Asha Karthikeyan1, Renuka Nayar3 and Jess Vergis1

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(3): 212-218, 2024

Address:

1Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, 

Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Wayanad (Kerala), India.

2Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, 

Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Wayanad (Kerala), India.

3Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, 

Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Wayanad (Kerala), India.

(Corresponding author: Vinod Valil Kunjukunju*)

DOI: -

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

The present study was envisaged to analyse a total of 164 samples (feed: 60, water: 60 and handwash: 44) for the presence of E. coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS), by microbiological and molecular methods. Overall occurrence rates of 64.63%, 19.47% and 10.36% were observed for E. coli, Salmonella spp. and NTS, respectively. The antibiotic susceptibility testing confirmed that 21.69% of E. coli isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR), with 19.81% being ESBL producers, among which the highest MDR isolates were recovered from trough water (28.8%), followed by feed (21.21%) and handwash (10.71%). Among the NTS isolates, 20.41% showed MDR pattern, and 11.76% were ESBL producers. In this study, a moderate biofilm-forming ability was exhibited by MDR test strains of E. coli at 24 and 48 h when compared with MDR-NTS strain which revealed weak biofilm formers at 48 h. Hence, further studies need to be pursued to address the challenges of AMR in the dairy industry.


Keywords

Antimicrobial resistance, Biofilm, Organised dairy cattle farm, E. coli, Non-typhoidal Salmonella, Multi-drug-resistance.


Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a global public health threat (Founou et al., 2021; Rayanoothala et al., 2021). The use of antibiotics in livestock farming for therapeutics and metaphylaxis is a fundamental practice (Van et al., 2020). However, the excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobials in livestock rearing is a key factor driving the development of AMR (Silva et al., 2023), potentially leading to the transmission of drug-resistant pathogens to humans and the environment (Teng et al., 2023). India, with nearly 193.50 million cattle and 109.90 million buffaloes, faces substantial challenges in managing antibiotic use in livestock. By 2030, antibiotic usage among livestock in developing countries is projected to double due to the expansion of food animal production. It has been half a century since the initial approval of antibiotic-infused feeds for livestock, aiming to enhance their overall health and boost animal productivity (Afema et al., 2018). 

On a global scale, Salmonella ranks as the third most frequently encountered bacterial pathogen identified in food-borne illnesses in humans, following Escherichia coli and Campylobacter (WHO, 2015). Dairy cattle can serve as significant reservoirs for Salmonella and E. coli, with contaminated milk and dairy products often implicated in outbreaks in humans (Wang et al., 2023). Strains of E. coli and Salmonella found in cow feces on dairy farms have the potential to contaminate the farm environment (Sobur et al., 2019). Intensive livestock operations significantly contribute to AMR transmission among humans, animals, and the ecosystem. Factors such as infection control, animal husbandry practices, animal movement, and biosecurity measures can also influence the emergence of AMR pathogens in dairy farms. Identifying these risk factors is crucial for preventing the emergence and potential transmission of AMR pathogens from dairy farm settings to humans.

WHO estimated that in 2010 food borne STEC caused more than 1.2 million illnesses, 128 deaths and nearly 13,000 Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) (Darshan et al., 2023). Despite the high percentage of human infections with enteric pathogens, the systematic studies on antibiotic-resistant enteric bacterial pathogens in the livestock farming system, particularly in dairy cattle and the farm environment, have not yet been adequately explored. As far as our current understanding goes, there is a noticeable scarcity of comprehensive studies examining the presence of drug-resistant enteric bacterial pathogens within dairy farm environments in India. In addition, studies evaluating the factors leading to the emergence of AMR pathogens in dairy farm settings are also limited in the Indian context. Hence, this study aims to fill this gap by investigating the presence of drug-resistant E. coli and Salmonella spp. among dairy cattle farm settings and associated risk for the emergence of AMR in one health perspective.

Material & Methods

The study area comprised three taluks of Wayanad district (Fig. 1) in Kerala state of India viz., Vythiri, Sulthan Bathery and Manathavady (110 26' 28'' - 110 58' 22'' N latitude and 750 46'38'' - 760 26'11' E) at an average altitude of 700 and 2100 m above the mean sea level. The animals used in this study were apparently healthy dairy cattle from small holder dairy farms. A total of 60 privately owned dairy cattle farms (with a herd size of 5-10 dairy cattle), 20 each from 3 taluks of Wayanad district, were selected for the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Research Committee, and all norms and standard protocols for animal welfare were followed. A longitudinal study was conducted to generate the desired data from August 2022 to August 2023. A total of 164 samples, comprising pooled samples of feed (n=60), trough water (n=60) and human handwashes (n=44) were aseptically collected, labelled and immediately transported under pre-chilled insulated storage boxes to the food quality assurance laboratory of the Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode for isolation of the bacterial pathogens. The milkers' hand washes were collected in a sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India). The samples were immediately processed for isolation and identification of E. coli and Salmonella spp. by cultural methods and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. 

The isolation and identification of E.  coli from the samples were performed as per ISO 16649: 2001, while ISO 6579-1: 2001 was employed for Salmonella spp. The samples were enriched at a rate of 1:10 dilution in buffered peptone water for E. coli. The enriched samples were streaked onto EMB agar for the isolation of E. coli and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Three to five representative colonies that showed typical metallic sheen of E. coli on EMB agar were picked and confirmed by molecular assay. The samples were enriched at a rate of 1:10 dilution in BPW for Salmonella spp. This was followed by selective enrichment in Rappaport- Vassiliadis (RV) broth followed by selective plating on xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) agar and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Three to five representative colonies that showed red colonies with the black center of Salmonella spp. on XLD agar were picked and confirmed by molecular assay.      

The antibiotic susceptibility testing for all the recovered bacterial isolates was carried out by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method (Bauer et al., 1996) on Mueller-Hinton agar (HiMedia) according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI, 2019). The commercial antibiotic discs (HiMedia) were selected based on the information provided by practicing field veterinarians i.e., gentamicin (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (10 μg), oxytetracycline (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ceftazidime/ clavulanic acid (30/10 μg). E.  coli ATCC 25922 served as the quality control strain. 

The biofilm-forming ability of the recovered isolates was qualitatively assessed using Congo red agar (CRA) assay (Freeman et al., 1989). The production of black streaks or colonies with a dry crystalline consistency indicated biofilm-forming ability, whereas pink or red colonies were observed with weak or moderate biofilm formers.

The biofilm biomass of the recovered isolates was estimated based on the crystal violet staining in the 96-well microtiter plate (Wakimoto et al., 2004). In brief, 96-well flat-bottom microtiter polystyrene plates (Tarsons, India) were inoculated with individual cultures of each test isolate @ 200 µL/well in nutrient broth in quadruplicate. After incubation at 37 °C for both 24 h and 48 h, the 'planktonic' cells were removed, and the biofilm formation was assessed by staining with 0.10% crystal violet for 30 min, followed by washing thrice with PBS (pH 7.20). Finally, the stain acquired by adherent (biofilm forming) bacteria was resolved in 200 µL of 95% ethanol, and biofilm-forming ability was quantified by measuring the optical density of each test isolate at 595 nm by a microplate reader (iMark microplate reader, Bio-Rad, USA). The bacterial isolates were classified into four categories based on their biofilm-forming ability: non-biofilm producers, weak, moderate, and strong biofilm producers. The cutoff value (ODc) for this classification was calculated as three standard deviations above the mean OD595 of the negative control (E. coli DH5α). Further, the isolates were classified as non-biofilm former, OD595 ≤ ODc; weak biofilm former, OD595> ODc and ≤ 2× ODc; moderate biofilm former, OD595> 2× Odc and ≤ 4× Odc; strong biofilm former, OD595> 4× Odc (Stepanovic et al., 2000).

Results & Discussion

A. Occurrence of E. coli and NTS

Out of the total 164 samples tested, 106 (64.63%) samples detected the presence of E. coli both by isolation and PCR assays, that includes 45 (75.0 %) trough water samples, 33 (55 %) feed samples and 28 (63.63 %) handwash samples (Table 1). Also, 37 (19.47%) samples detected Salmonella spp. that comprised 13 (21.66%) trough water, 15 (25%) feed and 9 (20.45%) handwash samples.

Among the 37 Salmonella spp., 17isolates were detected as NTS and of which 6.66 % of trough water samples, 15% of feed and 9.09% of human handwash samples were found to be positive to NTS.

It’s well established that dairy cattle can serve as reservoirs for both E. coli (Eldesoukey et al., 2022) and Salmonella spp. (Eguale et al., 2016), often carrying these bacteria asymptomatically. These pathogens are known to play a critical role in the transmission of drug-resistant genes within and between species (Manishimwe et al., 2021). The growth and survival of E. coli are typically influenced by factors such as nutrient and energy availability in various environmental conditions. Moreover, E. coli can enter a 'dormant' state, where cells cannot be easily recovered on standard laboratory media, and E. coli populations under complex natural conditions are often not accurately predictable (Semenov et al., 2007). These factors, along with differences in environmental and management factors, could be the likely reasons for the variation in the occurrence of E coli from different sources in our study. The detection of non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) in dung and slurry samples is highly significant for public health. Cattle manure is frequently utilized in organic farming, posing a potential risk of infection due to contamination with enteric bacteria. This could lead to adverse health outcomes for individuals exposed to such bacteria.

This study's findings indicate that the drinking water provided to cattle is microbiologically inadequate. The daily exposure of animals to E. coli and Salmonella spp. from this water source alone can be significant. Once these bacteria are introduced, they have the potential to persist over the long term, acting as a reservoir and a potential source of infection for cattle. Various other factors like nutrient availability in water, water trough design and farm location, biofilm-forming ability of the pathogens, exposure of trough to sunlight, ambient atmospheric temperature, competition with and predation by other microflora (Aditya et al., 2023), absence of effective periodic disinfection, contamination of groundwater by manure and slurry may also affect bacterial load of trough water.

In the present study, The E coli isolates recovered from trough water were strong biofilm formers. Biofilms in water troughs typically consist of various species of microorganisms and when multiple species collaborate to form biofilms, it can increase the resistance of foodborne pathogens to sanitizers. E. coli can create biofilms in conjunction with other bacterial types, potentially boosting the survival of its pathogenic variants within the biofilm community.   

The present study revealed higher levels of E. coli and NTS in feed samples compared to data reported by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) animal food surveillance program, with Salmonella spp. and E. coli rates standing at 12% and 12.5%, respectively (Ge et al., 2020). Feed stuffs may become contaminated with E. coli if they come in contact with contaminated agricultural produce or any surface that harbours the bacteria either during harvesting, storage, or transportation. The presence of non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) in feed could be attributed to several factors, including the ability of Salmonella spp. to survive in dry environments such as feed mills and bins, the access of rodents and birds to feed storage areas, the survivability of Salmonella in the farm environment, and the ability of Salmonella to multiply in warm, moist conditions during feed storage and under certain climatic conditions (Shahbazi et al., 2023). Furthermore, E. coli and NTS strains originating from contaminated feed can potentially be transferred to milk, raising significant health concerns for consumers.

The present study revealed that 63.6% of human handwash samples tested positive for E. coli, 20.45% of human handwash samples with Salmonella spp. and 9.09% of handwash samples with NTS (S. Typhimurium). However, all the NTS isolates exhibited only a weak biofilm-forming ability. The handwashing practices of farm workers have a significant impact on the occurrence of E. coli in hand wash samples of milkers and due to a lack of hygiene awareness, they usually contaminate their hands with their stool. Washing udders before and after milking with unclean water, cleaning milking equipment without using detergents, and milking with dirty hands can contaminate Salmonella.

A. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing among E.  coli and NTS isolates

In this study, among the recovered E. coli isolates (n= 106), the decreasing trends in resistance were observed (Table 2) in the order: amoxicillin-clavulanate (84.90%; 90/106), followed by oxytetracycline (39.62%; 42/106), gentamicin (30.18%; 32/106), ciprofloxacin (22.64%; 22/106), ceftriaxone (13.20%; 14/106) and meropenem (0.94%; 1/106). Among the 106 E. coli isolates, 19.81% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers and 23 E. coli isolates were MDR of which 28.88%, 21.22% and 10.71% of trough water, feed and handwash samples were MDR. 

According to our findings, phenotypic screening of antimicrobial resistance among E. coli and Salmonella spp. from dairy cattle farms displayed an alarming MDR pattern to indispensable antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine. The MDR- E. coli strains pose a public health concern because they indicate potential drug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. These results suggest that these isolates originated from high-risk sources where multiple antibiotics were used. While examining AMR patterns, we consistently identified resistance against β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines, pointing to the extensive utilization of penicillins/beta-lactamase inhibitors (Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid), fluoroquinolones (Ciprofloxacin), and tetracyclines (Oxytetracycline) within these farms for treatment and/or prophylaxis. This heightened resistance underscores the significant selective pressure exerted by the widespread use of these antibiotic classes in the dairy farms we investigated.    

NTS strains were given importance as they bear significant zoonotic importance. The NTS isolates recovered from this study exhibited comparatively higher resistance towards amoxicillin-clavulanate (64.70%), oxytetracycline (64.70%), gentamicin (29.41%), ciprofloxacin (29.41%) and ceftriaxone (23.52%); however, were sensitive to meropenem (100%). All the MDR-NTS isolates (n= 5) detected as S. Typhimurium were found to be resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate, gentamicin, oxytetracycline, and ciprofloxacin. Nonetheless, meropenem was found to be comparatively better with 100% susceptibility to the tested MDR-NTS isolates, respectively (Table 2). 

It is important to note that the occurrence of carbapenemase-producing (CP) bacteria in food-producing animals and their surrounding environment has not been sufficiently investigated in countries characterized by a high prevalence of CP bacterial infections in humans (Bonardi and Pitino 2019). Even though the occurrence of CP microbes in food-producing animals is relatively rare, the potential transmission of CP bacteria from these animals to products derived from them poses a significant risk to consumers, with severe consequences. Unprocessed foods such as raw milk have the potential to promote the dissemination of carbapenem resistance, and the presence of mobile genes that encode carbapenemase in foods of animal origin represents a possible hazard to human health. The MDR pattern observed in this study suggests that viable therapeutic options for treating common infections like mastitis in dairy cattle farms could be limited and emphasize the urgent need for antimicrobial stewardship practices in Indian dairy farm settings. The correlation between the occurrence of CP bacteria and the use of antimicrobials on the farm should also be better investigated.

C. Biofilm forming ability of the MDR isolates

(i) Congo Red Assay. Among the 23 MDR-E. coli isolates, 18 exhibited moderate to strong biofilm production, while 5 were weak biofilm formers. Of the 5 MDR-NTS isolates, 1 isolate was a moderate to strong biofilm-former, while the remaining 4 exhibited a weak biofilm-producing ability on congo red assay.

(ii) Microtitre plate assay. In this study, the biofilm-forming ability of the recovered MDR strains was estimated and graded (Table 3). The cutoff values of the absorbance for the negative control were calculated to be 0.087432 and 0.12418 for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Based on the formula, the MDR strains were graded as non-biofilm formers, weak, moderate, or strong biofilm formers. It was also estimated that

At 24 h, ODc × 2 = 0.174862 and ODc × 4 = 0.349724

At 48 h, ODc × 2 = 0.24836 and ODc × 4 = 0.49672

In this study, pronounced biofilm-forming ability was exhibited by the MDR- E. coli strains at 48 h than 24 h in contrast to the MDR-NTS (Fig. 2) strains (Table 3). Hence, among the 23 MDR- E. coli (Fig. 3) isolates, at 48 h, 82.60% were found to be moderate biofilm formers (n= 19), whereas 17.39% were strong biofilm formers (n= 4). Among the strong biofilm formers of MDR-E. coli, 2 isolates each were recovered from trough water and feed.

At 48 h, of the 5 tested MDR-NTS isolates, 80.0% were weak biofilm formers, while 20% were moderate biofilm formers. However, none of the MDR-NTS isolates exhibited strong biofilm-forming ability at 48 h. 

The source-wise analysis of 23 MDR- E. coli isolates revealed significant biofilm-producing abilities from those isolates recovered from trough water (P< 0.001) and feed (P< 0.01). However, the isolates recovered from handwash revealed significant (P< 0.05) biofilm-forming ability both at 24 h and 48 h.

A similar study was conducted in large-scale Chinese dairy farms to explore the biofilm ability of Staphylococcus aureus by Liu et al. (2020) and the rates of weak, moderate, and strong biofilm producers were 59.7% (37/62), 22.6% (14/62), and 17.7% (11/62) respectively. The formation of biofilms is linked to heightened tolerance for stressful conditions and increased pathogenicity. The capacity of E. coli strains to form biofilms serves as a survival strategy, enabling these microorganisms to persist in the environment for extended periods (Madani et al., 2022).

Fig. 1. Study location of sampling.

The isolate prefix V, M, B represents Vythiri, Mananthavady, and Sulthan Bathery, respectively, while isolate suffix F, W, HW represents feed, trough water, and handwash, respectively, whereas the numericals represent laboratory isolate numbers. PC represents positive control (E. coli ATCC 25922), while NC represents negative control (E. coli DH5α).

Fig. 2. Biofilm-forming ability among MDR-NTS isolates.

Images (a, b, c) denote biofilm-forming abilities among MDR- E. coli isolated from, trough water, feed, and human hand wash, respectively. The isolate prefix V, M, B represents Vythiri, Mananthavady, and Sulthan Bathery, respectively, while isolate suffix F, W, HW represents feed, trough water, and handwash, respectively, whereas the numericals represent laboratory isolate numbers. PC represents positive control (E. coli ATCC 25922), while NC represents negative control (E. coli DH5α).

Fig. 3. Biofilm-forming ability among MDR- E. coli isolates.

Table 1: Proportion of E. coli and NTS isolates recovered from dairy cattle farm settings under study.

Samples

No. of Samples

E.  coli isolates (%)

Salmonella isolates (%)

NTS isolates (%)

Water

60

75

21.66

6.66

Feed

60

55

25.0

15.0

Human handwash

44

63.63

20.45

9.09

TOTAL

164

74.71

19.47

8.13

Table 2: Antimicrobial susceptibility of E. coli and NTS isolates.

Antibiotics

E. coli isolates (n=106)

MDR- E. coli isolates (n=23)

NTS isolates (n=17)

MDR- NTS isolates (n=5)

R (%)

S (%)

R (%)

S (%)

R (%)

S (%)

R (%)

S (%)

Amoxclav

84.90

15.09

100

00

64.70

35.71

100

00

Gentamicin

30.18

69.81

8.69

91.30

29.41

85.14

100

00

Oxytetracycline

39.62

60.37

91.30

8.69

64.70

46.42

100

00

Meropenem

0.94

99.05

4.34

95.65

00

100

00

100

Ciprofloxacin

22.64

79.24

78.26

21..73

29.41

75

100

00

Ceftriaxone

13.20

86.79

52.17

47.82

23.52

82.14

80.0

20.0

ESBL-producers

19.81

21.73

11.76

40.00

R: Resistant; S: Sensitive

Table 3: Gradation of biofilm-forming abilities of MDR isolates of E. coli and NTS recovered from dairy cattle farm settings.

MDR-bacterial strains

Time (h)

Non-biofilm formers

(%)

Weak biofilm formers

(%)

Moderate biofilm formers

(%)

Strong biofilm formers

(%)

E. coli

(n=23)

24

13.04

34.78

43.47

8.69

48

0

40.32

82.60

17.39

NTS

(n=5)

24

0

40

40

00

48

0

80.0

20.0

00


Conclusion

The study reveals the widespread occurrence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in dairy farm settings. Most E. coli isolates in this study were recovered from trough water, whereas NTS was isolated mainly from feed samples, with alarming drug-resistance patterns. These pathogens can spread from animals to people via the food chain either directly or indirectly. The findings of this study demonstrate the need for a thorough surveillance system for antimicrobial usage as well as an AMR in livestock with a holistic approach to navigate these issues successfully; the key components being access to clean water, safe feed, and hygiene. The judicious use of antibiotics in dairy cattle, good farm management practices such as the personal hygiene of farm workers and manure treatment must also be implemented to minimize the risk of transmission of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms to humans. 

Large herds are an important predictor of resistance to multiple types of antimicrobials as they suffer from more disease problems and use antimicrobials more frequently than small herds. In addition, antibiotic-resistant gene transmission pathways are more complex than those on small farms. One potential risk with the present study design was that conclusions were drawn based on the susceptibility testing of samples obtained from small dairy farms. So, further research using samples from large dairy herds is essential to identify and thoroughly understand the key risk factors significantly influencing the development of MDR enteric pathogens. A One Health philosophy with a holistic mindset can address these issues through effective farm management systems.


Future Scope

A significant gap in knowledge and practice among farmers in this study area regarding animal biosecurity and management. Strengthening extension efforts seems crucial to raise awareness and promote improved practices. Providing education, training sessions, and resources can help empower farmers to make informed decisions and enhance the health and productivity of their animals. Also, identifying the risk factors for the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is important to identify effective interventions to contain this menace. Furthermore, formulating a comprehensive method for the continued surveillance of Biosecurity and antimicrobial resistance in dairy farms in Indian settings- Biosecurity is a key element in the fight against antibiotic resistance.

References

Afema, J. A., Ahmed, S., Besser, T. E., Jones, L. P., Sischo, W. M. and Davis, M. A. (2018). Molecular epidemiology of dairy cattle-associated Escherichia coli carrying bla CTX-M genes in Washington State. Applied and environmental microbiology84(6), e02430-17.

Aditya, A., Tabashsum, Z., Martinez, Z. A., Tung, C. W., Suh, G., Nguyen, P. and Biswas, D. (2023). Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Their Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Dairy Farms and their Microbial Ecosystems. Journal of Food Protection86(3), 100051.

Bauer, A. W. (1996). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45(4): 149-158.

Bonardi, S. and Pitino, R. (2019). Carbapenemase-producing bacteria in food-producing animals, wildlife and environment: A challenge for human health. Italian journal of food safety8(2), 77- 92.

CLSI- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2019). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement. M100-S24. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 31(1), 100-121.

Darshan, D. Patel, Murtaza, A. Hajoori and Jignaben, P. Naik (2023). Detection of Shiga Toxin Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157-A Food and Waterborne Zoonotic Pathogens as Implications of One Health Perspective. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15(5a), 640-646.

Eguale, T., Engidawork, E., Gebreyes, W. A., Asrat, D., Alemayehu, H., Medhin, G., Johnson, R. P. and Gunn, J. S. (2016). Fecal prevalence, serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonellae in dairy cattle in central Ethiopia. BMC Microbiology16(20), 1-11.

Eldesoukey, I. E., Elmonir, W., Alouffi, A., Beleta, E. I., Kelany, M. A., Elnahriry, S. S., Alghonaim, M. I., Alzeyadi, Z. A. and Elaadli, H. (2022). Multidrug-resistant enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from diarrhoeic calves, milk, and workers in dairy farms: A potential public health risk. Antibiotics11(8), 1-12.

Founou, L. L., Founou, R. C. and Essack, S. Y. (2021). Antimicrobial resistance in the farm-to-plate continuum: More than a food safety issue. Future science OA7(5), FSO692.

Freeman, D. J., Falkiner, F. R. and Keane, C. T. (1989). New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococciJournal of clinical pathology42(8), 872-874.

Ge, B., Domesle, K. J., Gaines, S. A., Lam, C., Bodeis Jones, S. M., Yang, Q., Ayers, S. L. and McDermott, P. F. (2020). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of indicator organisms Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from US animal food, 2005–2011. Microorganisms8(7), 1-14.

ISO, I. (2001). 16649-1:2001; Microbiology of the food chain - Horizontal method for the enumeration of beta-glucuronidase-positive Escherichia coli - Part 1: Colony-count technique at 44 degrees C using membranes and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta-D-glucuronide. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO, I. (2017). 6579-1: 2017; Microbiology of the food chain—Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella—Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.

Liu, K., Tao, L., Li, J., Fang, L., Cui, L., Li, J., Meng, X., Zhu, G., Bi, C. and Wang, H. (2020). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cases of clinical bovine mastitis on large-scale Chinese dairy farms. Frontiers in Veterinary Science7, 580129.

Madani, A., Esfandiari, Z., Shoaei, P. and Ataei, B. (2022). Evaluation of virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, and biofilm formation of Escherichia coli isolated from milk and dairy products in Isfahan, Iran. Foods11(7), 960.

Manishimwe, R., Moncada, P. M., Musanayire, V., Shyaka, A., Scott, H. M. and Loneragan, G. H. (2021). Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella from the feces of food animals in the east province of Rwanda. Animals11(4), 1-17.

Rayanoothala, P., Mahapatra, S. and Das, S. (2021). A Review on Mode of Action of Antibiotics: Paved the Path to Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance and their Mechanisms in Phytobacterial Disease Management. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 13(3a), 29-31.

Semenov, A. V., Van Bruggen, A. H., Van Overbeek, L., Termorshuizen, A. J. and Semenov, A. M. (2007). Influence of temperature fluctuations on Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in cow manure. FEMS microbiology ecology60(3), 419-428.

Shahbazi, G., Shayegh, J., Ghazaei, C., Ghazani, M. H. M. and Hanifian, S. (2023). Molecular detection, typing, and virulence potential of Salmonella Serotypes isolated from poultry feeds. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences26(2), 239-247.

Silva, A., Silva, V., Pereira, J. E., Maltez, L., Igrejas, G., Valentão, P., Falco, V. and Poeta, P. (2023). Antimicrobial resistance and clonal lineages of Escherichia coli from food-producing animals. Antibiotics12(6), 1-21.

Sobur, M. A., Sabuj, A. A. M., Sarker, R., Rahman, A. T., Kabir, S. L. and Rahman, M. T. (2019). Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. associated with dairy cattle and farm environment having public health significance. Veterinary world12(7), 984.

Stepanovic, S., Cirkovic, I., Ranin, L. and Svabic-Vlahovic, M. (2004). Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Letters in Appied. Microbiology, 38(5), 428-432.

Teng, J., Imani, S., Zhou, A., Zhao, Y., Du, L., Deng, S., Li, J. and Wang, Q. (2023). Combatting resistance: Understanding multi-drug resistant pathogens in intensive care units. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy167(2023), 115564.

Van, T. T. H., Yidana, Z., Smooker, P. M. and Coloe, P. J. (2020). Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses. Journal of global antimicrobial resistance20(2020), 170-177.

Wakimoto, N., Nishi, J., Sheikh, J., Nataro, J. P., Sarantuya, J. A. V., Iwashita, M. and Kawano, Y. (2004). Quantitative biofilm assay using a microtiter plate to screen for enteroaggregative Escherichia coliThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene71(5), 687-690.

Wang, J., Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Robertson, I. D., Guo, A. and Aleri, J. W. (2023). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella and the enumeration of ESBL E. coli in dairy farms in Hubei Province, China. Preventive Veterinary Medicine212(2023), 105822.

World Health Organization. (2015). WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015. World Health Organization.


How to cite this article

Dias Marita, Vinod Valil Kunjukunju, Bibin Mohan, Moonnamthodi Moosarikkal Reshma, Padikkamannil Abishad, Asha Karthikeyan, Renuka Nayar and Jess Vergis (2024). Antibiotic Resistance Profile and Biofilm-forming Ability of E. coli and Non-Typhoidal Salmonella spp. from Dairy Cattle Farm settings: A Public Health Concern. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(3): 212-218.