Author:
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(3): 153-156, 2024
Address:
1Associate Professor (Horticulture), Regional Research Station, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District (Tamil Nadu), India.
2Associate Professor (Horticulture), Horticultural College and Research Institute, Periyakulam, Theni District (Tamil Nadu), India.
3Associate Professor (CRP), ICAR-KVK, Tirur, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Tiruvallur District (Tamil Nadu), India.
4Associate Professor (PB & G), RRS, Tirur, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Tiruvallur District (Tamil Nadu), India.
5Assistant Professor (Agrl. Ento.), ICAR-KVK, Tirur, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Tiruvallur District (Tamil Nadu), India.
6Associate Professor (Horticulture), Agricultural College & Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Madurai (Tamil Nadu), India.
7Assistant Professor (Horticulture), Horticultural College & Research Institute for Women, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) Trichi (Tamil Nadu), India.
8Associate Professor (Horticulture), Horticultural College & Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu), India.
(Corresponding author: G. Sathish*)
DOI: -
Chilli, Capsicum annuum, Hybrids, On Farm Trial, Growth, Yield.
Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) is one of the most valuable spice crops in India. The crop is grown largely for its fruit. It is an indispensable spice essentially used in every Indian cuisine due to its pungency, spice, taste and appearing odour and flavour. Chilli fruits are rich source of vitamins viz., A, C and E. (Ngullie and Biswas 2016). India produces about 1.298 million metric tonnes of chillies from an area of 0.806 ha with average productivity of 1611 kg/ha. Chilli contributes about 33 per cent of the total spice export from India and holds for about 16 per cent share of the world spice trade Gogoi et al. (2021); Malathi et al. (2023).
In Tiruvallur district, farmers are mainly concentrating on the private varieties/hybrids and local varieties/types for their cultivation practices. The majority of the farmers in this block are do not follow any scientific cultivation aspects and only few of them use the high yielding varieties in their farming practices. The crop is more popular in this district, but due to insufficient knowledge regarding improved hybrids and management practices, the productivity of chilli is facing a barrier to reach its maximum price in export markets. Keeping these considerations in views, the present study was carried out with an objective to assess the growth, yield, economics and extension tools (technology gap, extension gap, technology index) of chilli hybrids.
The study on assessment of chilli hybrids IIHR Arka Harita and TNAU CO (ch)1 was carried out at farmers filed in five locations of Tiruvallur district viz., Ellapuram and Ekkadu blocks during 2017 – 2018. Arka Harita seeds were purchased from IIHR, Bengaluru, whereas TNAU CO (ch)1 seeds were purchased from HC and RI, TNAU, Coimbatore. The technical intervention taken up in the study were as follows: seed rate @ 200g/ha, spacing 75 × 65 cm, sowing time September, FYM @ 30 t/ha and NPK @ 60:80:80 NPK kg/ha. Cultural and agronomic practices were followed as per the standard recommendations and need based plant protection measures were taken up to maintain healthy crop stand. Before conducting the experiment, trainings were given to the chilli farmers regarding seed treatments, protray nursery raising and their management, transplanting of seedlings to main field, fertilizer application, pest and disease management, quality improvement etc. Data on output of chilli cultivation as well as local practices commonly adopted by the farmers were collected. The observations on plant height, days 50 per cent flowering, days taken to 1st harvest, number of fruits/ plant, fruit length (cm), cost of economics, market preference, thrips incidence, increase yield over farmers practice, technology gap, extension gap and technology index were recorded. The extension tools were workout using the formulae (Samui et al., 2000) as given below.
Technology gap = Potential Yield - Demonstration Yield
Extension gap = Demonstration Yield - Farmer’s Practice Yield
Technology Index = Potential yield - Demonstration Yield × 100/Potential Yield
Increase % over Farmers practice= {(Demonstration Yield- Farmer’s Practice Yield)/Farmer’s Practice Yield} × 100.
The results revealed that (Table 1) Arka Harita exhibited the highest values for growth, yield, economic traits and extension tools (Technology gap, Extension gap and Technology Index). The highest Plant height of 49.5 cm was recorded by Arka Harita and it was followed by TNAU CO (ch)1 (48.42 cm) whereas local check recorded the lowest plant height of 44.26 cm.
In the case of days to 50 per cent flowering Arka Harita recorded the earliest days for flowering (42) and it was followed by TNAU CO (ch)1 (44). Whereas, the longer days taken for flowering was noticed in local Arani variety (48 days). Similarly, Arka Harita recorded the earliest (80.48) for days taken to first harvest, and it was followed by TNAU CO (ch)1 (82.2) whereas the longer days taken to1st harvest was noticed in local variety (88.65 days). This might be due to different genetic makeup of both the varieties. Similar results were reported by Patil et al. (2012); Saravaiya et al. (2011); Rajamanickam (2020). Mishra et al. (2017) reported that days taken to 50 per cent flowering in chilli genotypes required 51 to 58 days under Allahabad condition. Similar type of trend was observed regarding the yield characters also.
In the present study, it was revealed that Arka Harita observed the highest number of fruits per plant (81.2) and it was followed by TNAU CO (ch)1 (77.8). Whereas, the local check registered the lowest number of fruits per plant (65.40).
Regarding yield characters, Arka Harita recorded the highest fresh and dry pod yield (29.04 t/ha; 6.0 t/ha) and it was followed by TNAU CO (ch)1 (26.6 t/ha; 5.3 t/ha), whereas the local check registered the lowest yield of 18.8 t/ha fresh pod and 1.8 t/ha dry pod. Higher fruit weight might be attributed by higher fruit length and fruit width. Similar results were reported by Mantano and Cedeno (2002); Kavitha et al. (2018); Rajamanickam (2020); Verma et al. (2020); Malathi et al. (2023).
Arka Harita recorded higher BCR of fresh and dry pod (3.05; 5.58) with the net profit of fresh and dry pod (Rs.2, 34,487; Rs. 5, 21,897) followed by TNAU CO (ch)1 which recorded BCR of fresh and dry pod (2.76;5.08) with net profit of Rs. 1,95,781 and Rs. 4,40,486 respectively. Whereas, local variety registered the lowest BCR for fresh and dry pods (1.82; 1.52) with net profit for fresh and dry pod (Rs. 97, 781; Rs. 59,559). This might be due to high individual fruit weight and yield potential governed by the genetic makeup of improved varieties.
From the Table 2, it was observed that Arka Harita hybrid recorded higher technology gap (2.96 t/ha), extension gap (10.20 t/ha) and technology index (10.10 %) compare to local variety. Similar results were also reported by Devi et al. (2020); Malathi et al. (2023). The increased growth, yield and economics observed might be due to the improved chilli hybrid, improved production technology and timely cultural operations followed in the on farm demonstration trials.
This result was in accordance with Singha et al. (2020); Malathi et al. (2023). The percentage increase over farmers practice was 54.10 per cent indicating the superiority over check with respect to yield characters.
Table 1: Performance of Chilli hybrids under Tiruvallur condition.
Technology | Plant height (cm) | Days to 50 per cent flowering | No. of fruits /plant | Days to 1st harvest | Fruit length (cm) | Market preference | Thrips incidence |
Farmers Practice Arani local | 44.26 | 48 | 65.4 | 88.65 | 10.0 | Good | 25.4 |
TNAU COCH-1 Chillies | 48.42 | 44 | 77.8 | 82.22 | 10.7 | Good | 17.2 |
IIHR Arka Harita Chillies | 49.54 | 42 | 81.20 | 80.48 | 4 | Very good | 16.4 |
Table 2: Yield and cost of economics of Chilli hybrids.
Technology | Yield | Net returns | BC ratio | |||
Fresh pod (t/ha) | Dry pod (t/ha) | Fresh pod | dry pod | Fresh pod | dry pod | |
Farmers Practice Arani local | 18.84 | 1.82 | 97,177 | 59,559 | 1.82 | 1.52 |
TNAU COCH-1 Chillies | 26.26 | 5.31 | 195,781 | 440,486 | 2.76 | 5.08 |
IIHR Arka Harita Chillies | 29.04 | 6.04 | 234,487 | 521,897 | 3.05 | 5.58 |
Table 3: Yield gap and yield index analysis of Chilli hybrids.
Technology | Potential yield (t/ha) | Increase per cent over farmers practice | Technology gap (t/ha) | Extension gap (t/ha) | Technology index |
Farmers Practice Arani local | - | - | - | - | - |
TNAU COCH-1 Chillies | 28 | 39.5 | 1.74 | 7.42 | 6.6 |
IIHR Arka Harita Chillies | 32 | 54.1 | 2.96 | 10.2 | 10.1 |
From the present study it was concluded that the chilli hybrid Arka Harita recorded higher yield and return than the local arani chilli at tiruvallur district which can uplift the economical status of the farming community. After the technological interventions farmers realized that Arka Harita a better choice interms of yield, returns and very good market preference under tiruvallur condition. Arka Harita hybrid will be promoted as FLD and mass demo during ensuing season at tiruvallur district of Tamil nadu.
The current investigation provided the information regarding the Arka Harita hybrid will be promoted as FLD and mass demonstartion during ensuing season at tiruvallur district of Tamil nadu and is suitable for chilli growing farmers of tiruvallur district to get higher yield as well as higher net income and benefit cost ratio in chilli.
Devi, P. B., Imotomba, R. K., Sorokhaibam, S., Singh, K. M. (2020). Varietal Performance of Chilli Variety Barnali. Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 9(1), 337-340.
Kavitha, P. S., Sudha, A. and Srividya, S. (2018). Assessment of Chilli varieties in Salem district for higher Productivity. Journal of Horticultural Science, 13(1), 119-121.
Malathi, G., Vijayan, R., Vijayakumar, R. M., Kohila, P. and Sriram, N. (2023). Assessment of per se Performance of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) Hybrids in Salem District of Tamil Nadu. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, 8(8), 480-482.
Mantano, N. and Cedeno, E. (2002). Agronomic Evaluation of Seven Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Cultivars. Revista Cientifica UDO, Agricola, 2(1), 95-100.
Mishra, T. S., Mishra, N. K., Singh, A. K., Singh, N. D. and Tripathi, A. N. (2017). Performance of different Genotypes of Chilli (Capsicum annuum) under Allahabad Agro Climatic Condition. Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 6(1), 141-144.
Ngullie, R. and Biswas, P. K. (2016). Impact of Front Line Demonstration on the Yield of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Agriculture update, 11(3), 283-287.
Patil, S. D., I. Bidari, B., Shashidhara, G. B. and Hedge, N. K. (2012). Genetic variability in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) Genotypes. Asian Journal of Horticulture, 5(2), 310-312.
Rajamanickam, C. (2020). Assessment of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) hybrids for growth and yield characters. Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 8(2), 12-15.
Samui, S. K., Maitra, S., Roy, D. K., Mondal, A. K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on Front Line Demonstration on Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18, 180-183.
Saravaiya, S. N., Koladiya, P. B., Patel, H. B., Patel, D. A., Parmar, V. L. and Patel, J. B. (2011). Evaluation of Different Genotypes of Chilli through IET under South Gujarat Conditions. Asian Journal of Horticulture, 6(1), 71-73.
Singha, A. K., Deka, B. C., Parisa, D., Nongrum, C. and Singha, A. (2020). Yield Gap and Economic Analysis of Cluster Front Line Demonstrations (CFLD) on Pulses in Eastern Himalayan Region of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(3), 606-610.