Author:
Govind Tikiani1*, B.L. Meena2, Subhash Sharma3, Yamini Tak2, L.K. Meena4 and Kamal Kumar Sharma5
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(6): 131-134, 2024
Address:
1M.Sc. Scholar, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Kota (Rajasthan) India.
2Assistant Professor, Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Agriculture University, Kota (Rajasthan) India.
3Associate Professor, Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Agriculture University, Kota (Rajasthan) India.
4Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Kota (Rajasthan) India.
5Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Kota (Rajasthan) India.
(Corresponding author: Govind Tikiani*)
DOI: -
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill.] is a very important leguminous seed crop known for its highly valued protein and oil owing to its use in food, feed and industrial applications. Soybean is sometimes referred to as the "Golden Bean" and the "Miracle Crop" of the twenty-first century because of its numerous applications. It has a high percentage of high-quality protein (42 per cent) and oil (20 per cent). Along with vitamins A, B, and E, it is abundant in minerals including calcium, phosphorus, and iron. It provides a variety of essential amino acids (EAA), including lysine, which is typically lacking in sources of plant-based protein. In terms of taxonomy, soybean originates from North-East China and is a member of the order Fabales, family Fabaceae, subfamily Faboidae and genus Glycine. The genus Glycine may be divided into two subgenera, Glycine and Soja. It is an autogamous, diploid (2n=40) plant. Soybean improves soil productivity by fixing atmospheric nitrogen at a rate of 65-100 kg per hectare through symbiosis with the bacteria Rhizobium japonicum, which renews and maintains soil fertility (Patil et al., 2014).
Soybean oil is beneficial to human health since it is plentiful in vitamin E and is high in vital fatty acids while being low in saturated fat. Soybean oil has 15 per cent saturated fatty acids, whereas 85 per cent are unsaturated (Balasubramaniyan and Palaniappan 2001). In India, soybean is cultivated over an area of 124 lakh hectares with a production of 139.7 lakh tonnes and the productivity is 1130 kg per hectare. In Rajasthan, soybean is cultivated over an area of 10.3 lakh hectares and it produces 9.9 lakh tonnes of grain with a productivity of 953 kg per hectare. In Kota division, soybean is produced over an area of 6.45 lakh hectares with a production of 6.001 lakh tonnes, with a productivity of 931 kg per hectare (Anonymous 2022-23). Development of high yielding cultivars with appropriate plant architecture and duration is of paramount importance. For this purpose selection of genotypes with suitable plant types to be used as parents in hybridization program is the need of the hour. The genetic diversity between the genotypes is important as the genetically diverse parents are able to produce high heterotic effects (Mian and Bahl 1989). A successful hybridization strategy between genetically diverse parents will lead to significant amount of heterotic response in F1 hybrids and wide range of variability in segregating generations. Keeping in view of the above information the present study was carried out to study the nature and extent of genetic diversity among the forty genotypes of soybean and identification of potential combinations for further improvement. Genetic diversity was estimated as per Mahalanobis D² statistics (1936) and clustering of genotypes was done according to Tocher's method as described by Rao (1952).
The experiment was carried out with forty genotypes of soybean along with four checks in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications at AICRP on soybean, Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Kota, Rajasthan, during Kharif 2023. The plot size for each genotype was 3m × 1.8m with spacing 45cm × 10cm. The observations were recorded on five randomly selected plants per plot for fourteen characters viz., plant height (cm), number of primary branches per plant, number of clusters per plant, number of pods per plant, pod length (cm), number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant (g), 100-seed weight (g), biological yield per plant (g), harvest index (%), protein content (%) and oil content (%) whereas, the observations for days to 50 percent flowering and days to maturity were recorded on a whole plot basis. Using Mahalanobis D2 statistics (1936), which are based on multivariate analysis, the collected data of different characters was subjected to an analysis of genetic divergence. The genotypes were then grouped into different intra- and inter-cluster groups using Tocher's method, as described by Rao (1952). It calculates the relative contributions of each character to the overall divergence and quantifies the variation in intra- and inter-cluster distance.
Table 1: List of forty soybean genotypes used in the study
Sr. No. | Name of genotypes | Source of genotypes | Sr. No. | Name of genotypes | Source of genotypes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | AUKS 23-1 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 21. | AUKS 23-21 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
2. | AUKS 23-2 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 22. | AUKS 23-22 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
3. | AUKS 23-3 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 23. | AUKS 23-23 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
4. | AUKS 23-4 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 24. | AUKS 23-24 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
5. | AUKS 23-5 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 25. | AUKS 23-25 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
6. | AUKS 23-6 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 26. | AUKS 23-26 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
7. | AUKS 23-7 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 27. | AUKS 23-27 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
8. | AUKS 23-8 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 28. | AUKS 23-28 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
9. | AUKS 23-9 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 29. | AUKS 23-29 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
10. | AUKS 23-10 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 30. | AUKS 23-30 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
11. | AUKS 23-11 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 31. | AUKS 23-31 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
12. | AUKS 23-12 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 32. | AUKS 23-32 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
13. | AUKS 23-13 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 33. | AUKS 23-33 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
14. | AUKS 23-14 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 34. | AUKS 23-34 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
15. | AUKS 23-15 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 35. | AUKS 23-35 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
16. | AUKS 23-16 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 36. | AUKS 23-36 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota |
17. | AUKS 23-17 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 37. | RVSM 2011-35 (C) | RVSKVV, Gwalior |
18. | AUKS 23-18 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 38. | NRC 138 (C) | IISR, Indore, Madhya Pradesh |
19. | AUKS 23-19 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 39. | JS-20-34 (C) | JNKVV, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh |
20. | AUKS 23-20 | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota | 40. | RKS-113 (C) | AICRP, ARS, AU, Kota, Rajasthan |
In culmination to genetic relationship, based on the relative magnitude of D2, forty soybean genotypes were grouped into nine distinct, non-overlapping clusters as shown in Table 2. The discrimination of genotypes into discrete clusters suggested the presence of a high degree of genetic diversity in the material evaluated. Among nine clusters, cluster I was the biggest with 25 genotypes viz., AUKS 23-1, AUKS 23-3, AUKS 23-4, AUKS 23-5, AUKS 23-8, AUKS 23-9, AUKS 23-10, AUKS 23-11, AUKS 23-12, AUKS 23-15, AUKS 23-16, AUKS 23-17, AUKS 23-18, AUKS 23-19, AUKS 23-20, AUKS 23-21, AUKS 23-23,AUKS 23-25, AUKS 23-26, AUKS 23-29, AUKS 23-30, AUKS 23-31, AUKS 23-32, AUKS 23-33, AUKS 23-34; cluster VII contained 5 genotypes i.e., AUKS 23-14, AUKS 23-24, AUKS 23-28, NRC-138 (C), JS 20-34 (C) and cluster IV contained 4 genotypes i.e., AUKS 23-27, AUKS 23-35, AUKS 23-36 and RVSM 2011-35 (C) while, rest of the clusters contained a single genotype only. Cluster II contained genotypes AUKS 23-22, cluster III (AUKS 23-13), cluster V (AUKS 23-6), cluster VI (RKS-113 (C)), cluster VIII (AUKS 23-7) and cluster IX (AUKS 23-2). This suggests that the genotypes being studied are diverse.
The average D2 values of intra and inter-cluster distances as well as the closest and farthest clusters from one another based on D2 values are displayed in Table 3. The intra-cluster distance ranged from 29.87 to 49.97. The maximum intra-cluster distance was recorded by cluster VII (49.97), followed by cluster IV (40.52) and cluster I (29.87). Cluster II, cluster III, cluster V, cluster VI, cluster VIII and cluster IX recorded (0.00) intra-cluster distance because these clusters contained a single genotype. The genotypes allocated to each cluster exhibit greater diversity, as shown by the maximum intra-cluster distance, while the minimum intra-cluster distance suggests a strong relationship between the genotypes inside the cluster. Similarly, the inter-cluster distances ranged from 21.71 to 209.27. The highest inter-cluster distance was observed between cluster VII and IX (209.27) followed by cluster VI and IX (173.19), cluster VII and VIII (161.66), cluster IV and VI (152.37), cluster IV and VII (147.84), cluster III and VII (143.71) and Cluster II and IX (128.17). The lowest inter-cluster distance was noticed between cluster II and VI (21.71) followed by cluster III and V (31.06), cluster III and VIII (33.41), cluster V and VI (37.73), cluster V and VIII (38.53), cluster II and V (41.33) and cluster III and VI (42.29). The greater the distance between two clusters, wider is the expected genetic diversity between them.
The mean values of fourteen characters for 9 clusters are presented in Table 4. Cluster VIII and IX had genotypes with a higher mean value for days to 50 per cent flowering and days to maturity. Cluster VIII had high values for plant height, number of primary branches per plant and oil content. Cluster IX had high values for number of clusters per plant, number of pods per plant, pod length, number of seeds per pod, 100-seed weight, biological yield per plant, harvest index % and seed yield per plant. Cluster III had high cluster mean values for protein content. Similar results were also reported by Promin et al. (2014); Dubey et al. (2018); Joshi et al. (2018); Sareo et al. (2018); Darai et al. (2020); Beyene and Jalata (2022).
Table 2: Distribution of soybean genotypes into different clusters.
Cluster | Number of genotypes | Genotypes |
Cluster I | 25 | AUKS 23-1, AUKS 23-3, AUKS 23-4, AUKS 23-5, AUKS 23-8, AUKS 23-9, AUKS 23-10, AUKS 23-11, AUKS 23-12, AUKS 23-15, AUKS 23-16, AUKS 23-17, AUKS 23-18, AUKS 23-19, AUKS 23-20, AUKS 23-21, AUKS 23-23, AUKS 23-25, AUKS 23-26, AUKS 23-29, AUKS 23-30, AUKS 23-31, AUKS 23-32, AUKS 23-33, AUKS 23-34 |
Cluster II | 1 | AUKS 23-22 |
Cluster III | 1 | AUKS 23-13 |
Cluster IV | 4 | AUKS 23-27, AUKS 23-35, AUKS 23-36 and RVSM 2011-35 (C) |
Cluster V | 1 | AUKS 23-6 |
Cluster VI | 1 | RKS-113 (C) |
Cluster VII | 5 | AUKS 23-14, AUKS 23-24, AUKS 23-28, NRC-138 (C) and JS 20-34 (C) |
Cluster VIII | 1 | AUKS 23-7 |
Cluster IX | 1 | AUKS 23-2 |
Table 3: Average intra and inter-cluster distance based on corresponding D2 values.
Cluster | Cluster I | Cluster II | Cluster III | Cluster IV | Cluster V | Cluster VI | Cluster VII | Cluster VIII | Cluster IX |
Cluster I | 29.87 | 48.91 | 47.19 | 55.22 | 46.39 | 79.72 | 111.36 | 54.21 | 92.54 |
Cluster II | 0.00 | 56.26 | 102.68 | 41.33 | 21.71 | 58.43 | 61.13 | 128.17 | |
Cluster III | 0.00 | 102.88 | 31.06 | 42.29 | 143.71 | 33.41 | 108.48 | ||
Cluster IV | 40.52 | 90.47 | 152.37 | 147.84 | 118.72 | 114.47 | |||
Cluster V | 0.00 | 37.73 | 102.61 | 38.53 | 147.00 | ||||
Cluster VI | 0.00 | 86.75 | 60.41 | 173.19 | |||||
Cluster VII | 49.97 | 161.66 | 209.27 | ||||||
Cluster VIII | 0.00 | 112.78 | |||||||
Cluster IX | 0.00 |
Table 4: Mean values of different characters for 40 genotypes of soybean grouped in different clusters.
Clusters | Days to 50 per cent flowering | Days to maturity | Plant height (cm) | Number of primary branches per plant | Number of clusters per plant | Number of pods per plant | Pod length (cm) | Number of seeds per pod | 100-seed weight (g) | Biological yield per plant (g) | Harvest index (%) | Protein content (%) | Oil content (%) | Seed yield per plant (g) |
Cluster I | 42.83 | 99.75 | 80.38 | 6.91 | 12.24 | 65.05 | 3.35 | 2.78 | 9.11 | 22.90 | 24.98 | 35.19 | 16.02 | 5.68 |
Cluster II | 38.00 | 97.00 | 73.53 | 5.28 | 13.97 | 67.60 | 3.19 | 2.60 | 8.80 | 22.51 | 25.36 | 34.26 | 17.22 | 5.71 |
Cluster III | 44.00 | 100.67 | 82.80 | 7.60 | 15.38 | 72.93 | 3.53 | 2.93 | 11.35 | 25.75 | 28.21 | 37.45 | 19.60 | 7.28 |
Cluster IV | 44.17 | 100.67 | 71.95 | 7.01 | 10.45 | 67.87 | 3.50 | 2.75 | 8.50 | 19.95 | 19.43 | 36.26 | 13.55 | 3.86 |
Cluster V | 42.33 | 99.00 | 77.80 | 8.47 | 9.07 | 60.20 | 3.06 | 2.33 | 8.07 | 18.29 | 21.66 | 35.94 | 19.00 | 3.95 |
Cluster VI | 38.00 | 96.67 | 69.47 | 7.40 | 15.17 | 72.27 | 3.25 | 2.73 | 8.76 | 24.10 | 24.36 | 37.10 | 19.71 | 5.87 |
Cluster VII | 32.40 | 90.47 | 57.76 | 5.79 | 10.12 | 53.17 | 3.46 | 2.75 | 9.03 | 22.29 | 22.42 | 36.68 | 15.10 | 4.88 |
Cluster VIII | 44.67 | 101.33 | 85.40 | 9.07 | 13.13 | 83.67 | 3.45 | 2.93 | 9.07 | 28.48 | 20.29 | 33.30 | 20.40 | 5.77 |
Cluster IX | 44.67 | 101.33 | 73.07 | 7.20 | 15.63 | 94.87 | 3.61 | 3.00 | 12.70 | 31.53 | 34.53 | 30.36 | 16.28 | 10.84 |
TOCHER’S METHOD
Mahalanobis Euclidean Distance (Not to the Scale)
Fig. 1. Diagrammatic representation of intra and inter-cluster distance.
Based on Mahalanobis D2 statistics, the current study contributes to the discovery of a diversified germplasm line and gene stock, which is necessary for any successful breeding plan to improve yield and its contributing attributes.
Anonymous (2022-23). Agricultural market information system (AMIS).
Balasubramaniyan, P. and Palaniappan, S. P. (2001). Principles and practices of agronomy. Agrobios (India), 566-576.
Beyene, D. G. and Jalata, Z. (2022). Diversity of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] genotypes based on agromorphological parameters. Journal of Pure and Applied Agriculture, 7(2), 30-37.
Darai, R., Dhakal, K. H. and Sah, R. P. (2020). Genetic variability of soybean accessions for yield and yield attributing traits through using multivariate analysis. International journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food science, 4(3), 108-125.
Dubey, N., Avinashe, H. A. and Shrivastava, A. N. (2018). Assessment of genetic diversity in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] genotypes. Research on Crops, 19(2), 271-275.
Joshi, D., Pushpendra, S. K., and Adhikari, S. (2018). Study of genetic divergence in soybean germplasm. Chemical Science Review and Letters, 7(26), 533-539.
Mahalanobis, C. R. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 11(1), 49-55.
Mian, M. A. K. and Bahl, P. N. (1989). Genetic divergence and hybrid performance in chickpea. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 49(1), 119-124.
Patil, S. S., Patil, P. P., Lodam, V. A. and Chaudhari, M. H. (2014). Character association and genetic diversity in soybean to formulate a sound breeding program – A review. Trends in Biosciences, 7(7), 508-511.
Promin, L., Khoyumthem, P., Devi, H. N., Sharma, P. H. R., and Paul, A. (2014). Genetic divergence studies in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Soybean Research, 75-80.
Rao, C. R. (1952). Advanced statistical methods in biometric research, John Wiley and Sons., New York.
Sareo, H., Devi, H. N., Devi, T. R., Devi, T. S., Karam, N. and Devi, L. S. (2018). Genetic diversity analysis among soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] genotypes based on agro morphological characters. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(12), 1839-1842.