Author:
Swathy V.1*, C. Gireesh2, R. Lokesha3, G.Y. Lokesh4, J.R. Diwan5, T.C. Suma6, S.T. Yenjerappa7 and M.S. Anantha8
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(4): 90-95, 2024
Address:
1Ph.D. Scholar, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India.
2Senior Scientist, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, Banglore, (Karnataka), India.
3Professor (Retd.), College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India.
4Associate Professor, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka (Karnataka), India.
5Professor, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India.
6Assistant Professor, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India.
7Professor, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India.
8Senior Scientist, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding,
ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad (Telangana), India.
(Corresponding author: Swathy V.*)
DOI: -
In light of climate change posing a threat to food crop production Direct seeded rice (DSR), an alternative to transplanted system of rice cultivation, is promoted when problem of low productivity is addressed. Association and Path analysis allows identification of key traits contributing to yield enhancement. This study was taken up during Kharif 2022 to unravel the significant associations among yield attributing traits under DSR conditions and thereby identify the promising component traits whose selection would improve yield in DSR. A total of 184 backcross inbred lines along with five checks and two parents were utilised for evaluation. Yield attributing traits such as Days to 50% flowering, Number of leaves at harvest, Number of tillers at harvest, Number of productive tillers, Plant height, Panicle length, Number of spikelets per panicle, Number of filled grains per panicle, Spikelet fertility %, Test weight and Single plant yield were recorded at harvest stage. The traits such as plant height, number of filled grains per panicle and test weight was found to have prominent influence on yield from the results of correlation and path analysis. However, a substantial residual effect observed in the path analysis suggested existence of additional factors contributing to yield variation in DSR that were not considered in this study.
Correlation, path analysis, Direct seeded rice, yield, yield attributing traits.
Assuring sustainability of global food security is the foremost objective in agricultural research. With a burgeoning world population and the challenges posed by climate change, preserving natural resources and enhancing the resilience of food production systems are critical imperatives. Rice being one of the most important food grain crop of the world, commands significant attention from agricultural researchers who strive to increase yield potential of rice varieties and hybrids (Hossain and Fischer 1995). However, this pursuit has been challenged with factors like climate change, decline in soil productivity, water crisis etc. Reports highlight that water scarcity and rising labor costs pose threats to conventional rice farming systems (Khokhar and Sarial 2018). Given the pressing need to increase yield efficiency while minimizing costs, alternative production systems like the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and Direct Seeded Rice (DSR) have garnered research focus, particularly on aspects related to productivity. In this regard, the DSR system, contrary to transplanted rice (TPR) system, has gained popularity in the recent past due to its low input demanding nature, especially in terms of water and labour. The promotion of DSR stems from the imperative to shift focus from mere "land productivity" to "water productivity," aiming to maximize yield per unit of water utilized in agriculture (Kharb et al., 2015). DSR also combines several advantages like early crop, low methane emission from fields, feasibility to include rice cultivation with other cropping systems etc. But one of the major drawbacks of DSR is the low productivity compared to TPR (Singh et al., 2016; Quilloy et al., 2021) which underscores the importance of ongoing research efforts to optimize DSR techniques in order to enhance yield and overcome productivity limitations.
This low productivity in DSR has been attributed to the usage of rice varieties specifically bred for irrigated conditions in Direct seeded system (Sagare et al., 2020). Jung and McCouch (2013) emphasized that even ecotypes or varieties of a plant species adapted for different ecologies vary widely in their aerial and rhizosphere traits. Consequently, there is a growing need to develop rice varieties tailored specifically for direct-seeded ecologies to address this challenge effectively. Supportively, Sarla and Swamy (2005) reported the usefulness of O. glaberrima as donor parent in crop improvement of Asian rice especially for growth in adverse conditions of low resource availability. Strategies for development of DSR varieties must focus on traits that enable better survival and yielding ability of rice plants in direct seeded condition. It is also essential to recognize that relying solely on grain yield as a selection criterion may lead to inconsistent performance of genotypes, primarily due to the intricate nature of yield traits (Ratna et al., 2015). Additionally, low heritability of the trait has also prompted breeders to advocate indirect selection for yield in rice (Atlin, 2003). Thus, analysis of correlation among component yield traits followed by the partitioning of these correlations into direct and indirect effect as suggested by Wright (1921) is reliable for interpretation of associations among yield and its component traits (Madhukar et al., 2017). On account of this, the current study aimed to investigate the correlation between grain yield and its various components, analyze the direct and indirect impacts of these factors on paddy yield, and pinpoint optimal combinations to serve as selection criteria for developing high-yielding rice genotypes suitable for dry direct seeded conditions.
The study utilized 184 backcross inbred lines (BC1F8 generation) derived from the interspecific cross of IR64*1/O.glaberrima alongside parental lines and four checks. Field experiments were conducted at the ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR) in Hyderabad, Telangana, during the Kharif season of 2022, employing an augmented design. The reference checks comprised Browngora, DRR Dhan 44, Sabita, Samba Mahsuri, and Sabhagidhan varieties. The dry direct seeding method was employed for sowing, involving the direct placement of rice seeds into ploughed dry soil, followed by gradual flooding irrigation. Top dressing was given with urea and murate of potash followed by need based fertilizer application and slow flooding irrigation at regular intervals. Yield attributing traits such as Days to 50% flowering (DFF), Number of leaves at harvest (NL), Number of tillers at harvest (NT), Number of productive tillers (NPT), Plant height (PHT), Panicle length (PL), Number of spikelets per panicle (NSP), Number of filled grains per panicle (NFG), Spikelet fertility % (SF), Test weight (TW) and Single plant yield (SPY) were recorded at harvest stage. Data on each trait from three plants were taken in each line or entry and average was estimated. Correlation analysis was carried out using the collected observations in R studio (version 4.3.2) based on the theory given by Pearson (1904). The statistical analysis for estimating Path coefficients as proposed by Dewey and Lu (1959) was utilised and carried out in R studio (version 4.3.2). The sorting of path coefficients into various classes based on magnitude have been followed according to Lenka and Mishra (1973).
The correlation coefficients estimated among yield and its attributing traits during Kharif 2022 under dry direct seeded condition for 184 backcross inbred lines (BILs) have been tabulated in Table 1. Significance in associations among these traits have been depicted as asterisk (*)sign (Fig. 1). Although DFF was found to have positive associations with NL (0.08), NPT (0.08), and NFG (0.07), significance for the positive relation was observed with NT (0.25) and NSP (0.16) only. Meanwhile, negative associations were found between DFF and PHT, PL, SF, TW, and SPY. This was parallel to the results of Madhukar et al. (2017) as well as Saran et al. (2023). The inverse associations of DFF with yield (SPY) and DFF with plant height may be beneficial as it indicates scope for selection of lines that are early flowering high yielders as well as late flowering dwarf types. Positive and significant association with NL was exhibited by NSP (0.19) and NPT (0.62) only. Meanwhile number of productive tillers NPT exhibited positive correlation with NT (0.58*), NSP (0.02) and TW (0.11) while negative relation with PHT (-0.05), NFG (-0.02), PL (-0.11), SF (-0.05) and SPY (-0.04). However, these results were unlike the findings of Demeke et al. (2023) who reported positive significant association between number of productive tillers and single plant yield but negative correlation between NPT and TW. NT had positive correlations with DFF (0.25*), NL (0.28), NPT (0.58), NSP (0.05), PHT (0.03) and NFG (0.01). Although the absence of correlation between NT and SF was against the reports of Saran et al. (2023), the association of NT with NFG coincided with their results. Meanwhile, PHT possessed positive relation with most traits such as NFG (0.23*), NSP (0.28*), PL (0.73*) and SPY (0.24*). Similar association of PHT with SPY was noted in the research of Khan et al. (2022) indicating a potential equilibrium between vegetative and reproductive growth in rice. Lan et al. (2023) proposed extreme deviations in plant height could detrimentally impact rice yields, indicating the necessity for finding an optimal balance. There may also exist such balancing interplays between PHT and NPT as well as PHT and TW which could be the reason for negative association observed between them. Taller plants tend to direct photosynthates for growth rather than in developing productive tillers or grain formation. Hence it may be agreed that breeding for semi-tall varieties over dwarf varieties is more advantageous as observed in the findings of Parimala et al. (2016). Similarly, NFG had negative correlation with NPT (-0.02) and TW (-0.18) which also points out the aspect of dry matter partitioning, whereby the number of filled grains in a panicle may be increased at the expense of average weight of a single grain. But DFF (0.07), NL (0.14), NT (0.01), PHT (0.23*), NSP (0.86*), PL (0.23*), SF (0.64*) and SPY (0.22*) exhibited positive relation with NFG, making it an important trait in selection of yield improvement (Parimala et al., 2016; Madhukar et al., 2017; Dameke et al., 2023; Saran et al., 2023). However, this was against the opinions of Surek and Beser (2003); Bagheri et al. (2011); Venkata Lakshmi et al. (2014). The significantly negative relation of number of spikelets per panicle NSP with TW (-0.22*) accompanied by its positive association with PL (0.29*) and NFG (0.86*) reinforces the potential equilibrium in biomass allocation. It highlights the possibility of long panicles with higher number of spikelets per panicle eventually resulting in high number of filled but small sized grains. Positive association of NSP with PL and NFG were also given by earlier researchers like Rajamadhan et al. (2011); Adithya and Anuradha (2013); Singh et al. (2013); Madhukar et al. (2017). Except for NT (0.05) and NPT (0.02) all other traits like DFF, NL, PHT, SF and SPY exhibited significantly positive relation with NSP. When PL had positive correlation with traits such as PHT (0.73*), NFG (0.23*), NSP (0.29*), and SPY (0.18*), it exhibited negative relation with DFF (-0.03), NPT (-0.11), NT (-0.02) and TW (-0.10). Meanwhile SF had positive correlations with NFG (0.64*), NSP (0.20*), PL (0.05) and SPY (0.26*). The positive correlation of SF with PL and NFG was aligning with results of Parimala et al. (2016) whereas similar relation of SF with SPY was reported by Haider et al. (2012); Singh et al. (2013); Chandan Kumar and Nilanjaya (2014). Similar to SF, test weight also did not exhibit any correlation with NT though most traits were negatively associated with TW, except NPT (0.11) and SPY (0.22*). The negative association of TW with NSP (-0.22) and NFG (-0.18) was however, significant. It may be noted that when NL and NT had no correlation with single plant yield, NPT had negative association (-0.04). Meanwhile all other traits [PHT (0.24), NFG (0.22), PL (0.18), SF (0.26), TW (0.22)] had positive significant relation with SPY, except NSP (0.08) which was positive but non-significant. The results were in agreement with Hairmansis et al. (2010) for NFG while in conformity with Yadav et al. (2010); Akhtar et al. (2011); Yadav et al. (2011); Seyoum et al. (2012); Venkata Lakshmi et al. (2014) for PHT. Thus, the study disclosed plant height, number of filled grains per panicle, panicle length, spikelet fertility and test weight as major traits significantly contributing to plant yield based on correlation analysis. Panicle architecture and plant stature has been concluded to be important for yield in DSR conditions as per reports of Madhukar et al. (2017).
The results of path analysis conducted for same data recorded on 184 lines have been tabulated in Table 2, to partition the correlation into direct effects, indirect effects and sort them into classes. As expected, and observed in the studies of Parte et al. (2022) and Saran et al. (2023), DFF had a negative direct effect (-0.0361) on yield. While it affected yield indirectly and positively through NL, NT, NFG and SF negligibly. Meanwhile, NL effected yield directly (0.0254) as well as indirectly through NT, PHT and PL but the effect was negligible. But it had low indirect positive effect through NFG (0.1561). Although NPT had negative (-0.0872) negligible direct effect on yield as observed in the research of Parte et al. (2022), its indirect effects through NL, NT, SF and TW were positive and negligible. The effect of NT on yield was found positive but negligible directly (0.0774) as against the reports of Parte et al. (2022) and Saran et al. (2023). But indirectly through NL, PHT and NFG, it influenced yield positively. The traits such as PHT (0.2141) and NFG (1.1152) had moderate and very high positive direct effect on yield respectively. Indirectly these traits affected yield through NL, NT, NPT and PL positively and negligibly. Nonetheless there were also findings of plant height with negative direct and indirect effects on yield (Panwar, 2006; Himaja et al., 2022). When considering the indirect effects on yield, plant height influences yield through its impact on days to flowering (DFF). Additionally, the number of filled grains (NFG) positively affects yield, partly through its indirect association with plant height. Despite the high negative direct effect of NSP on yield (-0.8344), it had high positive indirect effect on yield through NFG (0.9591). A very high negative direct effect of NSP on SPY was also revealed by Seyoum et al. (2012) in their study portraying it as a much less preferred trait for direct selection as NSP effected yield positively but negligibly through NL, NT and PHT. Panicle length possessed positive but negligible direct effect (0.0380) on yield. However, it had positive indirect effects on yield which was negligible through DFF, NL, NPT, low through PHT and moderate through NFG. Like NSP, spikelet fertility also exhibited high negative direct influence on yield. Inspite of this, it influenced yield highly and positively (0.7137) but indirectly through NFG as stated by Parte et al. (2022). Test weight had moderate positive impact on yield directly (0.2571) as seen in the research of Madhukar et al. (2017) while through DFF, NSP and SF it affected yield positively and indirectly. Thus, in the analysis conducted, it was revealed that several traits like number of leaves, number of tillers, plant height, number of filled grains per panicle, panicle length and test weight were direct determinant of yield in DSR conditions. However, only three of these traits viz., plant height, number of filled grains per panicle and test weight had significant direct effect on yield. Therefore, these three traits are deemed to be the most influential factors for selection in order to enhance yield in DSR conditions.
Table 1: Pearson Correlation coefficients for yield traits under dry direct seeded rice condition.
DFF | NL | NPT | NT | PHT | NFG | NSP | PL | SF | TW | SPY | |
DFF | 1.00 | ||||||||||
NL | 0.08 | 1.00 | |||||||||
NPT | 0.08 | 0.62 | 1.00 | ||||||||
NT | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.58 | 1.00 | |||||||
PHT | -0.13 | 0.10 | -0.05 | 0.03 | 1.00 | ||||||
NFG | 0.07 | 0.14 | -0.02 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 1.00 | |||||
NSP | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.28 | 0.86 | 1.00 | ||||
PL | -0.03 | 0.11 | -0.11 | -0.02 | 0.73 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 1.00 | |||
SF | -0.08 | 0.01 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.64 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||
TW | -0.07 | -0.04 | 0.11 | 0.00 | -0.08 | -0.18 | -0.22 | -0.10 | -0.03 | 1.00 | |
SPY | -0.10 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 1.00 |
DFF -Days to 50% flowering, NL- Number of leaves at harvest, NT- Number of leaves, NPT- Number of productive tillers, PHT – Plant height, NSP- Number of spikelets per panicle, NFG- Number of filled grains per panicle, PL- Panicle length, SF- Spikelet fertility, TW -Test weight, SPY- Single plant yield
Table 2: Direct (diagonal) and Indirect effect of component yield traits on single plant yield under dry direct seeded rice condition.
DFF | NL | NPT | NT | PHT | NFG | NSP | PL | SF | TW | |
DFF | -0.0361 | 0.0020 | -0.0070 | 0.0194 | -0.0278 | 0.0781 | -0.1335 | -0.0011 | 0.0241 | -0.0180 |
NL | -0.0029 | 0.0254 | -0.0541 | 0.0217 | 0.0214 | 0.1561 | -0.1585 | 0.0042 | -0.0030 | -0.0103 |
NPT | -0.0029 | 0.0158 | -0.0872 | 0.0449 | -0.0107 | -0.0223 | -0.0167 | -0.0042 | 0.0151 | 0.0283 |
NT | -0.0090 | 0.0071 | -0.0506 | 0.0774 | 0.0064 | 0.0112 | -0.0417 | -0.0008 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
PHT | 0.0047 | 0.0025 | 0.0044 | 0.0023 | 0.2141 | 0.2565 | -0.2336 | 0.0278 | -0.0181 | -0.0206 |
NFG | -0.0025 | 0.0036 | 0.0017 | 0.0008 | 0.0492 | 1.1152 | -0.7176 | 0.0087 | -0.1929 | -0.0463 |
NSP | -0.0058 | 0.0048 | -0.0017 | 0.0039 | 0.0599 | 0.9591 | -0.8344 | 0.0110 | -0.0603 | -0.0566 |
PL | 0.0011 | 0.0028 | 0.0096 | -0.0015 | 0.1563 | 0.2565 | -0.2420 | 0.0380 | -0.0151 | -0.0257 |
SF | 0.0029 | 0.0003 | 0.0044 | 0.0000 | 0.0128 | 0.7137 | -0.1669 | 0.0019 | -0.3014 | -0.0077 |
TW | 0.0025 | -0.0010 | -0.0096 | 0.0000 | -0.0171 | -0.2007 | 0.1836 | -0.0038 | 0.0090 | 0.2571 |
Residual effect = 0.777
DFF -Days to 50% flowering, NL- Number of leaves at harvest, NT- Number of leaves, NPT- Number of productive tillers, PHT – Plant height, NSP- Number of spikelets per panicle, NFG- Number of filled grains per panicle, PL- Panicle length, SF- Spikelet fertility, TW -Test weight
Fig. 1. Significance in correlations among yield traits under dry direct seeded condition.
Validation of these results across seasons and locations may ensure accuracy of these conclusions. In summary, this study provides valuable insights into the associations among yield-related traits in DSR, laying a foundation for future research and breeding endeavours aimed at bolstering the productivity and resilience of rice cultivation in response to climate change.
Adithya, J. P. and Anuradha, B. (2013). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for quantitative characters in rainfed upland rice of uttarakhand hills. Journal of Rice Research, 6(2), 24-34.
Akhtar, N., Nazir, M. F., Rabnawaz, A., Mahmood, T., Safdar, M. E., Asif, M. and Rehman, A. (2011). Estimation of heritability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in fine grain rice. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 21(4), 660-664.
Atlin, G. (2003). Improving Drought Tolerance by Selecting for Yield, In: Fischer, K. S., Lafitte, R., Fukai, S., Atlin, G and Hardy B, (Eds.), Breeding Rice for Drought-prone Environments, Los Banos, The Philippines, pp: 14-22.
Bagheri, N., Jelodar, B.N and Pasha, A. (2011). Path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in diverse rice genotypes. Biharean Biologist, 5(1), 32-35.
Chandan Kumar, and Nilanjaya (2014). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield components in aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.). The Bioscan, 9(2), 907-913.
Dameke, B., Dejene, T. and Abebe, D. (2023). Traits association and path coefficient analysis of yield and yield attributing traits of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes at Pawe, northwestern Ethiopia, Journal of Innovative Agriculture, 10(4), 21-30.
Dewey, J. R. and Lu, K. H. (1959). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51, 515- 518.
Haider, Z., Abdus S. K. and Samta, Z. (2012). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under simulated drought stress condition. American Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science, 12(1), 100-104.
Hairmansis, A., Kustianto, B., Supartopo and Suwarno (2010). Correlation analysis of agronomic characters and grain yield of rice for tidal swamp areas. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11, 11-15.
Himaja, G., Mohan, Y. C., Kumar, S. C. V. and Naik, S. D. (2022). Studies on Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis of Yield and Yield Attributing Traits in Semi Dry System of Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(2), 316-324.
Hossain, M. and Fischer, K. S. (1995). Rice research for food security and sustainable agricultural development in Asia: Achievements and future challenges. Geo Journal, 35, 286–298.
Jung, J., and McCouch, S. (2013). Getting to the roots of it: Genetic and hormonal control of root architecture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4(186), 1-32.
Khan, R., Anandan, A., Mishra, T. K., Lenka, D. and Ranjith, P. (2022). Maximizing Rice Production via Direct Seeded Rice: Insights from Correlation and Path Analysis. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(4), 794-797.
Kharb, A., Sandhu, N., Jain, S., and Jain, R. K. (2015). Linkage Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Traits Promoting Aerobic Adaptation on Chromosome 8 in indica Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice Genomics and Genetics, 6(6), 1-5.
Khokhar, J. S. and Sarial, A. K. (2018). Evaluation of Indian Rice Varieties under Direct Seeded and Transplanted Rice Production Systems for Grain Yield and Quality Traits. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience, 6(6), 1107-1115.
Lan, D., Cao, L., Liu, M., Ma, F., Yan, P., Zhang, X., Hu, J., Niu, F., He, S., Cui, J., Yuan, X., Yang, J., Wang, Y. and Luo, X. (2023). The identification and characterization of a plant height and grain length related gene hfr131 in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1152196.
Lenka, D. and Misra, B. (1973). Path Coefficient Analysis of Yield in Rice Varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 43, 376-379.
Madhukar, P., Surender Raju, Ch., Senguttuvel, P. and Reddy, S. N. (2017). Association and Path Analysis of Yield and its Components in Aerobic Rice (Oryza sativa L.), International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 6(9), 1335-1340.
Panwar, L. L. (2006). Character Association and Path Analysis In Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annual Agricultural Research New Series, 27(3), 257-260.
Parimala, K., Raju, S. Ch., Kumar, S. and Reddy, S. N. (2016). Studies on Character Association and Path Analysis in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.), The Journal of Research, 44(3), 21-25.
Parte, D., Sathish, K., Sahu, P., Sharma, D., Bhainsa, K., Das, B. K. and Shrivastava, R. (2022). Correlation and Path Analysis Studies for Yield and Quality Traits of Rice Landraces and Mutants of Chhattisgarh, India, International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 12(12), 1771-1779.
Pearson, K. (1904). On the Theory of Contingency and its Relation to Association and Normal Correlation. London: Dulau & Co.
Quilloy, F. A., Labaco, B., Casal, C. and Dixit, S. (2021). Crop Establishment in Direct-Seeded Rice: Traits, Physiology, and Genetics. In: Ali, J., Wani, S.H. (eds) Rice Improvement. Springer, Cham.
Rajamadhan, R., Eswaran, R and Anandan, A. (2011). Investigation of correlation between traits and path analysis of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain yield under coastal salinity. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 2(4), 538-542.
Ratna, M., Begum, S., Husna, A., Dey, S. R., and Hossain, M. S. (2015). Correlation and path coefficients analyses in basmati rice. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 40(1), 153-161.
Sagare, D. B., Abbai, R., Jain, A., Jayadevappa, P. K., Dixit, S., Singh, A. K., Challa, V., Alam, S., Singh, U. M., Yadav, S., Sandhu, N., Kabade, P. G., Singh, V. K. and Kumar, A. (2020). More and more of less and less: Is genomics-based breeding of dry direct-seeded rice (DDSR) varieties the need of hour ? Plant biotechnology Journal, 18(11), 2173–2186.
Saran, D., Gauraha, D., Sao, A., Sandilya, V. K. and Kumar, R. (2023). Correlation and Path coefficient Analysis for Yield and Yield Attributing Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35(18), 94-101.
Sarla, N. and Swamy, B. M. (2005). Oryza glaberrima: a source for the improvement of Oryza sativa. Current Science, 89(6), 955-963.
Seyoum, M., Alamerew, S. and Bantte, K. (2012). Genetic variability, heritability, correlation coefficient and path analysis for yield and yield related traits in upland rice. Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(1), 13-22.
Singh, A. K., Sharma, P. and Singh, P. K. (2013). Studies on genetic characteristic of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 6(4), 515-520.
Singh, R., Mahajan, G. and Bhullar, M. S. (2016). Direct Seeded Rice in North West India – Opportunities, Scope and Research Gaps. ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Ludhiana. pp:52.
Surek, H. and Beser, N. (2003). Correlation and path coefficient analysis for some yield related traits in rice under thrace conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Forum, 27, 77-83.
Venkata Lakshmi, M., Suneeta, Y., Yugandhar, G. and Vekata Lakshmi, N. (2014). Correlation Studies in Rice (Oryza sativa L.), International Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 5(2), 121-126.
Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557- 585.
Yadav, S. K., Pandey, P., Kumar, B and Suresh, B. G. (2011). Genetic architecture, interrelationship and selection criteria for yield improvement in rice. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 14(9), 540-545.
Yadav, S.K., Suresh, B.G., Pandey, P and Kumar, B. (2010). Assessment of genetic variability, correlation and path association in rice. Journal of Biological Sciences, 18, 1-8.
Swathy V., C. Gireesh, R. Lokesha, G.Y. Lokesh, J.R. Diwan, T.C. Suma, S.T. Yenjerappa and M.S. Anantha (2024). Association and Path Analysis of Yield and Component Traits of Rice under Dry Direct Seeded Condition. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(4): 90-95.