Author:
Ranju Nagesia1* and Mehul G. Thakkar2
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(9): 75-79, 2024
Address:
1Research Scholar, Department of Agribusiness Management,
Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari (Gujarat), India.
2Major Guide, Associate Professor in HRM and University Placement & Counselling Head,
Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari (Gujarat), India.
(Corresponding author: Ranju Nagesia*)
DOI: -
Awareness, Brand preference, Buying behaviour, Constraints, High yield, Hybrid seeds, Market access, Perceived risk, Tomato.
Agriculture sustains 58% of India's population and is crucial for GDP, alongside fisheries and forestry (FAO, 2021). Horticulture a sub-branch of agriculture, contributes about 33% to the agriculture Gross Value Added (GVA) making very significant contribution to the Indian economy. Apart from ensuring nutritional security of the nation, it provides alternate rural employment opportunities, diversification in farm activities, and enhanced income to farmers. Horticulture encompasses vegetables, fruits, spices, flowers, medicinal, and aromatic crops. Vegetables provide nutrition, economic security, high returns, and improved livelihoods. India is the second largest vegetable producer (MoAFW, 2022). The growth of this sector is driven by high-quality inputs, technology, and polyhouse production, particularly in Asia (Federation of Seed Industry of India, 2019). In India major producers of vegetables are West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and more. In 2022-23, 827,288 MT of vegetables worth Rs. 2,443 crores were exported from the country. In the year 2023-24, the production was 209.39 million tonnes in 11.24 million Ha area, (APEDA, 2024). Seed is the most crucial input among all agricultural inputs, initiating the cycle of agricultural production and agro-industry. Without high-quality seeds, the impact of other inputs like fertilizers and pesticides on crop yield will be limited. Therefore, to enhance productivity levels in crops, having "good quality seed is essential." In India, there are currently around 200 private seed enterprises. Both public and private sector organisations play an important role in fostering the growth of the vegetable seed business and vegetable production. The private seed sector comprises a few large players, several medium companies and many small players with a local presence. With their major concentration on biotechnology, the most significant international seed firms now have a presence in India (either as a joint venture or with 100 per cent equity). The major players in the Indian vegetable seed industry are Nunhems (a subsidiary of BASF), Seminis (a subsidiary of Bayer), Syngenta (Switzerland-based MNC), and Namdhari Seeds, Mahyco Seeds, Krishidhan Seeds, Nuziveedu Seeds, Rasi seeds and others. Globally tomato production is profitable business due to the high demand and multiple harvests. China is the largest producer of tomato producing 36% of global output. In India 0.78 million ha is cultivated and 19.75 million metric tonnes produced annually. The top tomato producing states are Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka. In Jharkhand the annual production is 400,000 to 450,000 metric tonnes. The introduction of high-yielding hybrid tomato varieties has significantly impacted the tomato industry in India. These hybrids have contributed to increased productivity, higher farmer incomes, and improved market supply. The availability of disease-resistant varieties has also reduced crop losses and minimized the dependence on pesticides, promoting more environmentally friendly agricultural practices.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The literature review summarizes findings from various research studies related to this topic. It helps identify existing knowledge about the research problem and highlights areas that require further investigation. Key relevant studies are summarized below.
Sajjan & Kerur (2018) identified the key determinants of brand preference such as seed quality, yield potential, pest and disease resistance, and availability for cotton hybrid seeds. The findings suggested that established seed brands with a reputation for high-quality products and reliable performance were mostly preferred by farmers. The study also highlighted the importance of effective marketing and distribution strategies in shaping farmers' brand preferences.
Oraon et al. (2018) reported the key constraints as lack of knowledge about improved varieties, high cost of inputs, inadequate irrigation facilities, lack of technical guidance, and limited access to credit.
Hussain et al. (2020) found a positive relationship between brand loyalty and brand preference for chilli seeds among farmers. In their opinion, brands are highly valuable assets, and brand preference reflects customer allegiance, successful marketing campaigns, and brand strength.
Mantrabuddi et al. (2021) found that factors such as yield potential, resistance to pests and diseases, brand reputation, price, and availability of the seeds were the primary determinants of farmers' buying behaviour towards tomato seeds. The findings suggested that seed companies and policymakers should focus on developing high-yielding and disease-resistant tomato seed varieties, maintaining a strong brand reputation, and ensuring the availability of seeds at competitive prices to better cater to the needs of the farming community.
Sindhuja et al. (2022) studied and revealed that most farmers purchased hybrid vegetable seeds from private retail outlets and preferred cash over credit for their purchases. The study also identified yield, price, quality, pest and disease resistance, and agro-climatic adaptability as the major factors influencing farmers' buying behaviour. The results were statistically significant, and the study concluded that understanding farmers' buying behaviour can help in filling the gap between their needs and the products offered in the market.
Kumar & Masih (2023) provided a comprehensive analysis of the market share and factors influencing seed demand for tomato seeds. The study revealed that hybrid seeds were the most popular followed by Syngenta, Shanker, Kalash, Kaveri, Krishidhan, Nuziveedu, and Rasi seeds. Key factors affecting demand included seed quality, availability of fertilizers and agro-chemicals, access to credit facilities, and the use of modern agricultural machinery. The study also highlighted challenges in the tomato seed marketing system, such as high commission charges and limited access to market information.
This study describes the awareness and brand preferences of farmers for hybrid tomato seeds in Latehar district of Jharkhand.
Research Design. In this project, 250 farmers from five blocks of Latehar district in Jharkhand were taken under study. Descriptive cross sectional research design was chosen for its suitability in obtaining a clear picture of the status of a phenomenon and in gathering detailed information that describes the existing conditions and practices.
Data Collection
1. Primary data: The study is predominantly based on primary data. Primary data were collected from tomato growing farmers of Latehar district of Jharkhand with the help of structured interview schedule.
2. Secondary data: Secondary data were also utilized for the study, which involved an extensive literature review, analysis of annual reports from various Government and Non-Government organizations, examination of previous research studies, and collection of relevant secondary data from published reports of government departments, research papers, newspapers, books, and internet sources. Secondary data were sourced from various books, articles, journals, periodicals, other published and unpublished sources, as well as electronic databases and internet resources.
Sampling procedure & sample size. In this study, 250 tomato growing farmers were selected through multi stages sampling method. In the first stage, Latehar district was selected purposively as it had more no. of tomato growing farmers with its suitable climatic conditions for growing tomatoes. In the second stage, out of nine blocks of Latehar district, five blocks were selected randomly. In the third stage, five villages from each block were selected randomly. Finally, in the fourth stage, 10 farmers from each village were selected randomly; making the total sample size of 250 farmers.
Socio Economic characteristic of Farmers. Based on the frequency analysis of the responses of 250 respondents, as shown in Table 1, socio economic characteristics of respondents –tomato growing farmers- were classified according to their gender, age, land holding size, education status, annual family income and occupation. Out of 250 respondents, majority (71.60%) of the respondents were male and only 28.40 per cent respondents were female. Most of the respondents 33.20 per cent fell within the 31-40 years age group. Additionally, about 29.60 per cent of respondents fell within the 41-50 years age group. Only 22.80 per cent respondents between 21-30 years old while 14.40 per cent of respondents were above 50 years old, while there were. Most of the respondents comprising 44.00 per cent belong to Marginal (up to 1 ha) and 35.60 belong to small (1.01-2 ha) category based on the land holding size. 11.60 per cent respondents are semi medium (2.01-4 ha) and 8.80 per cent are medium (4.01- 10.00). 48.80 per cent respondents have completed their study up to secondary school, 25.20 per cent and 24.40 per cent have completed primary school and graduation respectively. Only 1.60 respondents are postgraduates. 36.67 per cent respondents have their annual family income up to ₹ 1, 00,000 and 32.67 per cent have their annual family income between ₹ 1, 00,001 to ₹ 3, 00,000. 15.33 per cent respondents have their family income between ₹ 3, 00,001 to ₹ 5,00,000 and only 8.67 per cent having annual family income above ₹ 5,00,000. 56.40 per cent respondents practice farming along with animal husbandry and 19.60 per cent respondents practice farming only as their main occupation. 13.20 per cent does Farming & business and 10.80 per cent does Farming & business.
Table 1: Socio economic characteristic of respondents (n = 250).
Variables | Parameters | Frequency | Percentage |
Gender | Male | 179 | 71.60 |
Female | 71 | 28.40 | |
Age of respondents | 21-30 years | 57 | 22.80 |
31-40 years | 83 | 33.20 | |
41-50 years | 74 | 29.60 | |
Above 50 years | 36 | 14.40 | |
Land holding size | Marginal (up to 1 ha) | 110 | 44.00 |
Small (1.01-2 ha) | 89 | 35.60 | |
Semi Medium (2.01-4 ha) | 29 | 11.60 | |
Medium (4.01-10 ha) | 22 | 8.80 | |
Large (>10 ha) | 00 | 00.00 | |
Education status | Primary School | 63 | 25.20 |
Secondary School | 122 | 48.80 | |
Graduate | 61 | 24.40 | |
Postgraduate | 4 | 1.60 | |
Annual family income | up to 1,00,000 ₹ | 110 | 36.67 |
1,00,001 to 3,00,000 ₹ | 98 | 32.67 | |
3,00,001 to 5,00,000 ₹ | 46 | 15.33 | |
Above 5,00,000 ₹ | 26 | 8.67 | |
Occupation | Farming only | 49 | 19.60 |
Farming & Animal husbandry | 141 | 56.40 | |
Farming & Service | 27 | 10.80 | |
Farming & Business | 33 | 13.20 |
Awareness among farmers for hybrid tomato seeds. It is seen that 100 % of the respondents are fully aware and familiar with hybrid tomato seeds. It is seen that 50% of the respondents get information regarding the seed varieties from the seed companies in the form of field demonstrations, farmer meetings, and advertisements. 26% get the information from fellow farmers, 14 % from Agricultural Extension services and rest of the 10 % get the information from other sources like electronic media. All the 250 respondents have grown hybrid tomato in the past.44% of the respondents have been growing hybrid tomatoes for more than 10 years, and 35 % have 5-10 years of experience of growing hybrid tomatoes, 18% have experience in between 2-5 years and the remaining 3 percent have less than 2 years of experience. In the results it is found out that 100% of the farmers are aware of a total of three brands from the below list i.e. Seminis, Syngenta and Nunhems. More than 90% are aware of Namdhari (97%), and VNR seeds (94%). Very few respondents are aware of Seed brands like Akshay seeds (13.6%), Shatabdi Seeds (17%) & Bombay Super Hybrid Seeds (only 2%).It is seen that 100% of respondents have used Syngenta, and more than 90% of respondents have used Nunhems (97%), Seminis (96.4%) and Namdhari (93.6%). VNR (75%) & Dhanya (60.4%) are also quite popular among farmers in some areas. Bombay Super Hybrid Seeds have no existence in Jharkahnd state hence none of the respondents have used this brand in the past.
Table 2: Brands known to respondents and its usage (n = 250).
Sr. No. | Brand Name/Company | Percentage | |
Awareness | Usage | ||
1. | Seminis | 100 | 96.4 |
2. | Namdhari | 97.2 | 93.6 |
3. | Syngenta | 100 | 100 |
4. | Dhanya | 66.8 | 60.4 |
5. | VNR Seeds | 94.8 | 75.6 |
6. | Solar Seeds | 58 | 9.2 |
7. | Bio Seeds | 29.6 | 5.2 |
8. | Nunhems | 100 | 97.2 |
9. | IndoSem | 49.2 | 47.6 |
10. | Shatabdi seeds | 17.2 | 2 |
11. | Akshay seeds | 13.6 | 1.2 |
12. | Bombay Super Hybrid seeds | 2 | 0 |
13. | Others | 0 | 0 |
Factors Influencing the Brand Preference of Hybrid Tomato Seeds
Analytical technique employed:
Garrett’s Ranking Technique: To study the factors influencing brand preference of hybrid tomato seeds Garrett ranking technique was adopted (Garrett &Woodworth 1926).
To know the brand preference of hybrid tomato seeds in the study area 10 factors were selected
Table 3: List of factors influencing brand preference for hybrid tomato seeds and their ranks.
Sr. No. | Factors | Mean | Rank |
1. | High yield compared to another brands | 66.336 | I |
2. | Quality of fruit compared to other brands | 66.332 | II |
3. | Resistant to seed borer | 65.648 | III |
4. | Dealers’ influence | 57.392 | IV |
5. | Availability | 51.192 | V |
6. | Influence of advertisement | 42.04 | VI |
7. | Progressive farmers/friends’ influence | 41.164 | VII |
8. | Price | 41.108 | VIII |
9. | Availability on credit | 36.776 | IX |
10. | Attractive package and unit size | 32.012 | X |
Considering above factors (Table 3), it has been concluded that which factor is more influencing while choosing a brand to purchase.
Step I: Ranking given by 250 respondents for each factor was calculated-
Step II : Assigned ranks has been converted into percent position value using the formula
Where,
Rij = Rank given for the ith item by the jth individual.
Nj = Number of items ranked by jth individual.
The per cent position value for the same assigned ranks and their Garret score are as follows
Table 4: Ranks’ Percent Position value and its Garrett score.
Rank | Percent position value | Garrett Score |
1 | 5 | 82 |
2 | 15 | 70 |
3 | 25 | 63 |
4 | 35 | 58 |
5 | 45 | 52 |
6 | 55 | 48 |
7 | 65 | 42 |
8 | 75 | 37 |
9 | 85 | 30 |
10 | 95 | 18 |
Step III: For each per cent position value, scores were obtained with reference to Garrett’s Ranking Conversion Table and each per cent position value was converted into scores by reference to Garrett’s Table. E.g.: Garrett’s Table scores for the percent position values given in Table
Step IV: Ranks given by the total no. of respondents to each factor is calculated. Summation of the Garrett scores for each factor was worked out for the number of respondents who ranked for each factor & Mean scores were calculated by dividing the total score by the number of respondents. As shown in Table
Step V: Overall ranking was obtained by assigning ranks I, II, III.... X etc. in the descending order of the mean score.
In the results after analysis, it is seen that factors “High yield compared to another brands” and “Quality of fruit compared to other brands” are the two most influencing factors with mean score 66.34 & 66.33 respectively. After that, factors like the variety being resistant to seed borer, dealers’ influence on brand and seeds availability comes as rank 3, 4 and 5 with the mean score of 65.65, 57.39 & 51.19 respectively. Factors like Attractive package and unit size, Availability on credit & Price being less are found to have the least influence in the purchase decision of farmers.
Garrett, H., E. & Woodworth, R., S. (1926), Statistics in Psychology and Education, 1st Edition.
Hussain, K. A., Seedari U. R., Devi, I. B. & Mantrabudhi, B. K. (2020). Farmers’ brand preference and loyalty towards Chili Seeds in Guntur District of Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience, 8(4), 539-549.
Kumar, K. & Masih V. A. (2023). Study on farmers buying behaviour for tomato seeds in Bareilly district Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 8(5), 2456-4184.
Mantrabuddi, B. K., Seedari, U. R., Devi, I. B. & Guttapalle, M. N. (2021). Identification of factors that influence farmers' buying behavior towards tomato seed through factor analysis: a case study in Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Innovative Agriculture, 8(2), 47-51.
Oraon, D., Singh, R. K., Pandey, V. K., Rai, V. P., Singh, U. K. & Alam, Z. (2018). Constraints in adoption of improved Tomato production technologies in Chatra District of Jharkhand. Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 7(Special Issue), 24-26.
Sajjan, S. S. & Kerur, N. M. (2018). To assess the brand preference in hybrid cotton seeds in North Karnataka. International Journal of Commerce and Business Management, 11(1), 75-80
Sindhuja, K., Sivakumar, S. D., Chandrakumar, M. & Premavathi, R. (2022). A study on farmers’ buying behaviour of hybrid vegetable seeds in Coimbatore District. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 40(10), 472-478.
Web references:
Food and Agriculture Organization (2021). Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/india/faoinindia/india-at-a-glance/en/
APEDA (2024). Retrieved from https://apeda.gov.in/apedawebsite/six_head_product/Fresh_Fruits_Vegetables.htm
https://agriwelfare.gov.in/en/Hirticulture
Indian seed sector, Retrieved from https://seednet.gov.in/material/Indianseedsector.htm
Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (2022). Retrieved from https://agriwelfare.gov.in/en/SeedsDiv
Indian Seed Federation, Retrieved from https://worldseed.org/resources/seed-statistics/
Indian Seed Sector, Seed Net India Portal. Retrieved from https://seednet.gov.in/
Indian seed sector analysis, Mordor Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/indian-seed-sector-analysis