Constraints in Production of Maize in Warangal Rural District of Telangana State

Author:

M. Maheshnath1*, Nahar Singh1, Sanjay Kumar1, Joy Dawson2 and Anupriya Paul3

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(6): 177-179, 2024

Address:

1Department of Agricultural Economics, NAI, SHUATS, Prayagraj (Uttar Pradesh), India.

2Department of Agronomy, NAI, SHUATS, Prayagraj (Uttar Pradesh), India.

3Department of Mathematics &Statistics, NAI, SHUATS, Prayagraj (Uttar Pradesh), India.

(Corresponding author: M. Maheshnath*  imaheshnath@gmail.com)


DOI: -

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Maize was one of the major crops grown in Warangal Rural district of Telangana. The present study was undertaken to examine constraints in the production of maize. The findings of the study revealed that the sample farmers expressed labour scarcity and was assigned first rank followed by Irregular availability of irrigation water, High labour cost, Input supply center is far away, Inadequate credit supply by financial institution, High cost of growth regulators, Low quality of seeds, High incidence pest & diseases, Shortage of fertilizer, Non availability of recommended pesticides, Scarcity of farm yard manure, Low productivity, and finally low yield which assigned least rank. Opinioned occurrence of pests and diseases i.e. fall army worm incidence was the major problem in the study area with a Garrett’s score of 76.1 which was followed by unavailability of labour during the peak period with a score of 66.9. In the next order high cost of plant protection chemicals, high cost of fertilizers and less seed viability constraints were observed.


Keywords

Constraints, Production, Maize, Labour scarcity, Incidence, Pest & Diseases.


Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) referred to as the Queen of Cereals, is a vital crop in India, standing as the third cash crop after wheat and rice. With 15 million Indian farmers engaged in maize cultivation, states like Karnataka, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Telangana contribute significantly to the country's maize production. To ensure remunerative prices for farmers, India must plan production by enhancing productivity and reorienting the value chain (IIMR, 2022-23).

In Telangana, maize ranks third among all crops, covering an extensive area of 12.74 lakh acres. The maize production in Telangana reached 28.65 lakh tonnes during 2022-23 (DES, 2022-23). Major maize-growing districts in Telangana include Warangal Rural, Khammam, Nirmal, Siddipet, Kamareddy, Mahabubabad, Nizamabad, Warangal Urban, Jagityal and Karimnagar. Over the last decade, both the area and production of maize have witnessed significant growth in the state (TSAGRICULTURE, 2022-23).

Survey of Literature: Kumari et al. (2015) examined problems and prospects of maize crop in eastern zone of Bihar. Results showed that, for Kharif maize, 90 per cent of farmers used a native variety. The primary (70%) institutional limitation was the village's market connectedness, which was followed by an inadequate and inconsistent supply of energy. A major (90%) marketing limitation in the research area was lack of effective marketing infrastructure, which seem to be a very depressing development for the maize farmers.

Krishna et al. (2018) listed out constraints in the production and marketing of maize in Karimnagar district of Telangana. According to the findings, the sample farmers suffered from crop damage from wild animals and birds, labour shortages, and excessive labour costs. A major obstacle that affected 58.33 per cent of maize growers was the high cost of inputs. More specifically, lack of credit, dearth of storage options, lack of seed options suitable for the region, late crop planting, excessive weed infestation, etc. One of the main issues that 50 per cent of corn growers mentioned was abnormal weather in the following order. Another obstacle cited by 35 per cent of corn farmers was the low price of grains.

The biggest issues with marketing are a lack of storage and warehouse facilities (31 percent), poor transportation, and high transportation costs. Involvement of middlemen during marketing to obtain fair prices (Muramatti et al., 2022). 

Yadav et al. (2021) concluded that major constraints in cotton crop production was high cost of seeds and the unfavourable weather conditions that led to crop failure followed by lack of technical guidance, unavailability of credit, marketing facilities and technical knowledge. Further, fall in prices during harvesting season also affected farmers with lower returns.

Padhy et al. (2022) based on the data collected from 240 cotton growing farmers from two districts viz., Gajapati and Rayagada of Odisha state, identified the constraints faced by cotton growing farmers. The study recommended for soil testing to assess the soil fertility status and also suggested on fertilizer application, measurement and grading transparency, immediate payments, providing market information and conducting awareness programmes through cluster approach.

The study revealed that the major constraint was frequent price fluctuations and was assigned first rank followed by high transportation cost, lack of information about government schemes and subsidies, high commission charges, lack of awareness of new technologies, lack of availability of market information at farm level, lack of cooperatives in marketing societies at village level, weighing loss during storage, lack of scientific training about maize cultivation, lack of amenities and facilities in the market, lack of support prices when there is a glut in the market, lack of proper infrastructure in market, lack of storage facility, and finally delay in cash payment which assigned least rank (Maheshnath et al., 2024).

Material & Methods

Garrett’s ranking technique. Garrett’s ranking technique was used to rank the constraints faced by the farmers in the study area. Respondents were asked to rank the listed constraints and rank one meant most important and last rank meant least important. Then, the rank assigned to each constraint by each individual farmer was converted into per cent position using the following formula

Where, Rij stands for rank given for the ith constraint (i= 1, 2……n) by the jth individual (j=1,2…..50) and Nj stands for number of constraints ranked by jth individual.

Results & Discussion

Table and figure revealed that constraints faced by the different size of farms group in production of Maize. Most of the Respondents expressed that major constraint was identified that labour scarcity and was assigned first rank followed by Irregular availability of irrigation water (II), High labour cost (III), Input supply center is far away (IV), Inadequate credit supply by financial institution (V), High cost of growth regulators (VI), Low quality of seeds (VII), High incidence pest & diseases (VIII), Shortage of fertilizer (IX),Non availability of recommended pesticides (X), Scarcity of farm yard manure (XI), Low productivity (XII), and finally low yield which assigned least rank i.e. (XIII) respectively.

Table 1:  Constraints in Production of Maize in Different Size of Farms Group.

Sr. No.

Particulars

(Value in Numbers)

S  M  L =  57 + 44 + 19 = 120                   

Number of Respondents = 120

Size of Farms Groups

Total in percentage

Rank

Small

Medium

Large

1.

Low quality seed

22

14

12

48(40.00)

VII

2.

Shortage of fertilizers

13

20

10

43(35.83)

IX

3.

Labour scarcity

45

44

24

113(94.17)

I

4.

High labour cost

32

23

15

70(58.33)

III

5.

Scarcity of farm yard manure

10

16

11

37(30.83)

XI

6.

Input supply center is far away

27

21

19

67(55.83)

IV

7.

High cost of growth regulators

20

18

11

49(40.83)

VI

8.

Non availability of recommended pesticides

15

17

10

42(35.00)

X

9..

High incidence pest & diseases

24

12

11

47(39.17)

VIII

10.

Inadequate credit supply by financial institution

33

18

15

66(55.00)

V

11.

Regular availability of irrigation water

33

26

16

75(62.50)

II

12.

Low yield

10

10

5

25(20.83)

XIII

13.

Low productivity

14

11

10

35(29.17)

XII

Note: Figures in the parenthesis indicate percentage to the total 

Fig. 1. Constraints in Production of Maize in Different Size of Farms Group Data.


Conclusion

Farmers expressed production problems were that labour scarcity and was assigned first rank followed by Irregular availability of irrigation water, High labour cost, Input supply center is far away, Inadequate credit supply by financial institution, High cost of growth regulators, Low quality of seeds, High incidence pest & diseases, Shortage of fertilizer, Non availability of recommended pesticides, Scarcity of farm yard manure, Low productivity, and finally low yield which assigned least rank.


References

Krishna, M., Deshmukh, K. V., Chavan, R. V. and Ritesh, A. C. (2018). Constraints in the production and marketing of Maize in Karimnagar district of Telangana, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology & Applied Sciences, 7(9), 1786-1788.

Kumari, M., Lokesh, K. M. and Ravi, G. S. (2015). Problems and prospects of Maize crop in eastern zone of Bihar. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 5(2), 137-146.

Maheshnath, M.,  Singh, N., Kumar, S., Dawson, J. and Paul, A. (2024). Constraints in Marketing of Maize in Warangal Rural District of Telangana State. International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences,     16(2), 19-21.

Muramatti, G., Sarangi, K. K.,  Mishra, S. N. and Dash, A. (2022). Production and marketing Constraints of maize in Karnataka state. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(4), 1321-1324.

Padhy, C., Raju, P. S. and Raj, R. K. (2022). Constraints in Cotton cultivation reported by growers and suggestive measures. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 39(2), 118-125.

Yadav, S., Godara, A. K., Nain, M. S. and Singh, R. (2021). Perceived constraints in production of Bt cotton by growers in Haryana. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 133-136.


How to cite this article

M. Maheshnath, Nahar Singh, Sanjay Kumar, Joy Dawson  and Anupriya Paul  (2024). Constraints in Production of Maize in Warangal Rural District of Telangana State. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(6): 177-179.