Author:
Rohendra Singh1, H.C. Joshi1*, Khashti Dasila1, Neha Tiwari1, Deepti Negi1 and Prashant Singh2
Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(5): 111-123, 2025
Address:
1Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani (Uttarakhand), India.
2Department of Chemistry, DAV (PG), Dehradun (Uttarakhand), India.
(Corresponding author: H.C. Joshi*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.5.16
Himalayan state, Self- Help Group, Sustainable development goal, Traditional Water Harvesting System, Water Security.
Water is a finite and vulnerable resource, necessary for the environment to support life and growth (Hogeboom, 2020). Water plays a crucial role in the expansion of large cities and the formation of communities that are deeply connected to tradition, regional knowledge, and culture. However, over the past few years, concessions on water supplies have become a global issue. Currently, about 2.3 billion people were suffering from inadequate water supply, and about 4 billion people have been without water for at least one month (Tanik and Hanedar 2024). The limited availability of water on the Earth, is ever circulating through water cycle, constitutes the major part of the global system of hydrology (Dastorani and Poormohammadi 2012). The Himalayan region is home to numerous folk knowledge practices that have been tested and evolved over time by indigenous inhabitants living in harmony with nature (Oli and Dhakal 2008). Uttarakhand is one of the fourteen hilly states and Union Territories in northern India, situated in the Western Himalayas. The water problem in the region is complex, involving shortages, pollution, and challenges with its management. Mountain ecosystems in the region are important in providing water supply but experience management challenges that affect both quantity and quality of water (Molden et al., 2013).
Uttarakhand has also seen comparatively poor water management and is severely affected by a water deficit due to overutilization for human and animal use, urbanization, deforestation, and land use change. Fecal bacterial count is on the increase, thus posing health effects to human, especially the underprivileged population with inadequate treated water supply (Sharma, 2014). The improper water treatment increases incidences of waterborne diseases, hence health disparities that are seen to be social inequalities thus affect sensitive populations (Chakraborty, 2017). Contaminated water depletes many public health resources, as millions of people suffer from illnesses linked to a lack of clean water (Greenberg, 2009). Despite the abundant water resources in the region, water scarcity issues persist in many areas due to inadequate water management, heightened population pressure, and climate change (Sharma, 2016). Water is a simple and indispensable necessity for life in any given society for the inhabitants of a particular territory. Conventional rainwater harvesting systems are essential for future water management practice, for improving water access and use, the stimulation of agriculture, and for maintaining water ecosystems in different parts of the world. Therefore, rainwater harvesting remains a central activity towards realizing adequate and quality water supply. Rainwater harvesting systems can reduce water scarcity impacts as they offer a source of water that is not being sourced in many places, as the water table reduces in urban centers (Abraham and Priyadarshini, 2024).
The conservation of rainwater for use in strengthening water supply and demand can help communities with water scarcity, including dry regions. This was in recognition of the fact that conservation of water resources leads to protection of the environment and the provision of potable water that contributes to public health. The knowledge of microbial characterization and activities in rainwater has significant implications for the management of resource to prevent the deterioration of water quality; thus, the importance of further research on this topic is essential (Liu et al., 2024). For centuries, traditional water harvesting systems like naulas (stone-lined wells), Guhls (irrigation canals), dhara (springs), and Khal (ponds) have been used to collect and manage water sustainably in Uttarakhand Himalaya (Fig. 1). Therefore, the present review is comprehensive analysis of existing literature on traditional water harvesting systems with particular focus on its cultural and historical significance in Uttarakhand.
Traditional Water Harvesting System in Uttarakhand. Social and cultural water harvesting systems of Uttarakhand are particularly important for meeting the agricultural and domestic water requirements from the Himalaya, which is rather difficult terrain (Saha et al., 2021). These systems, due to their origin from African indigenous knowledge and practices, have over the past been crucial sources of water in various ways including drinking, livestock, and agriculture (Negi and Kandpal, 2003). Traditionally, the existed water conservation structures in Uttarakhand were used by the inhabitants for drinking purposes along with other uses like irrigation purposes and domestic requirement. These were developed systems to complement some of the existing natural factors, hence making them most efficient in the geographical structures of the Himalayas, which are steep and mostly contain hills (Gupta and Kulkarni 2018). These ancient resources, such as springs, are still in operational and could be a sustainable future water resource (Patni et al., 2022). This water harvesting system were budget friendly and require basic construction material includes stone, wood, and mud like to build and easy to maintain (Bhattacharya, 2015). Historical findings suggest, the conventional ways of making water harvesting structures were also part of cultural and religious beliefs. It was common for many of these structures to be regarded as being of religious significance, and their preservation was therefore a matter of local concern. Nevertheless, owing to increased modernization, most of these traditional water supply methods have faded or else have broken down with the introduction of piped water supply systems. However, present water challenges and climate change realities have fostered some form of appreciation of such systems, hence calls for their restoration.
Several types of traditional water harvesting systems have been used in Uttarakhand, each adapted to the specific needs and geographical features of the region (Table 1). The most prominent ones include Naulas, Dharas, Khal and Guhls.
Naulas (Stepwells). Naulas are mini stepwells for accumulating water from springs. They are usually constructed near the source of a stream where the water is collected in small pits with stones (Rawat, 2021). The steps are constructed to enable people to access water at the water source. Mostly the Naulas are built in a village or on roadsides so that it becomes convenient for the community to use them. They are more commonly found in the Kumaon region as compared to Garhwal and the most prominent feature of Kumaun naulas is longevity. Naulas are flooded water storage structures and have been providing local users with requisite fresh drinking water for centuries. They were designed to perch groundwater and recharge it in the process, and were ideally suited where natural springs were common. Such traditional structures have contributed much to water governance to make safe water access available in many areas (Singh et al., 2022). There are numerous examples of sustainable technology that are still in use today. Around the 7th century A.D., the Badrinathji-ka-naula is arguably the oldest naula still in use. Other significant ones are the oldest one in Almora district, Syunrakot Naula (14th or 15th century), Patan-ka Naula (14th or 15th century), and Jahnvi Naula (1263 A.D.) in Gangolihat (Baker, 1997). The longevity of Kumauni naulas can largely be attributed to the dedicated maintenance efforts of local communities. Throughout history, naulas were clearly community property until around 30 years ago. Typically, there were no specific management guidelines. In October 1938, the ruler of Tehri Garhwal took a significant step by introducing the Prant Panchayat Vidhan, marking an important development in local governance and administration (PSI, 2009).
Dharas (Water Springs). Dharas or Munguru are types of naturally occurring water sources that receive from the ground without passing through a pipeline (Fig. 1 a&b). These springs are common in hilly areas and have been an important source of water for villages in Uttarakhand. Dharas used to be considered as sacred structures, and their construction was protected by the community like the Naulas. People collect water from these springs for drinking and household purpose. Dharas maintain groundwater levels and provide clean water even during dry seasons. In hilly areas these water bodies are the only sources of water supply such as Parda dhara and Sipahi dhara in Nainital and perennial dhara next to a Shiva shrine in Gopeshwar (Chopra, 2003).
Khal (Man-made Ponds). Khal is small, low-depth ponds used as conventional rainwater management system for rainwater storage. These constructions are carried at higher ground with a purpose of harvesting water during the monsoon and used for irrigation and domestic purposes. It slows rainwater flow by reducing its speed, helping it absorbs into the ground, and minimize runoff thus prevents soil erosion and maintain the soil moisture, thus improving agriculture (Suri and Mamta 2022). In Pauri district, around 70 well-known khals have been identified specially designed to collect rain water (PSI, 2009).
Guhls (Irrigation Channels). Guhls are the irrigational streams used in conveying water from rivers or streams to fields in hilly areas. They are built with a gentle slope, allowing water to flow easily from higher places to the fields below. These channels are usually dug manually, creating shallow trenches that guide the water flow. These guhls have a capacity of fifteen to hundred liters of water per second and range in length from one to fifteen kilometers (Bhattacharya, 2015). Guhls are an efficient water source to terraced fields in hilly areas for irrigation purposes. Communities often maintain them together to ensure a steady water supply for their crops (Banskota, 1999).
Structural significance of traditional water harvesting system. Naulas consist of sharply defined components that have a practical form and are used nowadays (Fig. 2). The structure is constructed as an inverted trapezoid, and the tank is three-sided and covered to shelter water. The fourth side does not have any roof, and there are some stairs that lead toward the water tank for convenient access. The lowest step is the smallest (1 × 1 ft), and the highest step (8 × 8 ft) in size (Chopra, 2003). A pillared verandah is constructed around the naula, and on the exterior part of it, more often ink carvings are made, enhancing the cultural aspect of the naula. These structures are designed to exclude animals and other biotic intrusions, thereby minimizing the risk of water contamination (Rawat and Sah 2009).
Dharas are natural springs that have their own water source on the ground. They are formed when water stockpiled underground in layers and moves out through the fracture zones from the rocks. In some rural areas with insufficient water supply, it is the only water source for drinking and domestic purposes (Admin, 2021).
Khals are excavated water bodies that are constructed on hill slopes for harvesting water from upland runoff. These ponds are simply dug out to small depressions and covered with stone or clay to avoid water evaporation. The harvested water is used for irrigation, livestock, and recharging of groundwater. Dimensions of khals may range from 5 to 10 meters in length, 5 to 7 meters in width and 0.75 to 1 meter in depth (Patil et al., 2018).
The volume of Khal can be theoretically calculated as V= E.C.R.A/f
Where, V= volume of Khal; C = surface run-off coefficient; R = Maximum rainfall in a day; A = catchment area; E = efficiency factor; f = number of times Khal is filled (generally 1.5 to 3) (Patil et al., 2018).
Guhls are traditional irrigation channels used to divert water from rivers or streams to agricultural fields. Generally, they are farmer managed irrigations systems (FMIS). They follow the natural slopes of hills to avoid erosion. The guhl in Maletha village, Tehri Garhwal, is one of the most renowned guhl in Uttarakhand. It is based on FMIS and constructed by carving a 100-meter tunnel through solid rock, situated about 350 meters from its diversion point (PSI, 2009). Traditionally, guhls are useful in supplying water to the agricultural land, particularly in the hills where farmers engaging in terrace farming (Sharma et al., 2023).
Cultural significance of traditional water harvesting system. Naulas, Dharas, Khal, and Guhls are the traditional water resources that are used in day-to-day life and farming practices in the region of Uttarakhand. Community people consider these traditional water resources equivalent to the deities thus ensure the maintenance and hygiene. According to the Vaastu legislation of the deities, they were also constructed under the specific Vastu Vidhaya (Joshi, 2019). Dharas are often recognized by small shrines dedicated to local deities inside or near the spring. Sculptures of Lord Vishnu or any local deity are usually carved onto the walls of the Naula or Dhara to declare it a sacred site and prevent it from being polluted (Joshi, 2018).
It is local tradition to decorative Naulas in every village in the Kumaon region. Ek Hathiya ka Naula, Syunrakot Naula, Naga Naula, Jahnavi Naula, Sidh Naula, Hathi Naula, and Badi Bagheeche Naula are some famous Naulas that are not only known for their unique taste but also for artistic architecture (Fig. 2). In ancient times, trees were strategically planted near various naulas to enhance groundwater recharge and protect the integrity of these water sources. These tree species include oak (Quercus leucotrichophora), kharik (Osmanthus fragrans), peepal (Ficus religiosa), bargad (Ficus bengalensis), timil (Ficus pathmala), dudhaila (Ficus nemoralis), padam (Prunus cerasoides), amla (Emblica officinalis), shahtut (Morus alba), and utis (Alnus nepalensis). They contribute significantly in ecological balance and water conservation in the area (Rawat and Sah, 2009). Thus, majority of traditional water harvesting system like Naulas are functionally and culturally similar, with different architecture and equal significance. Despite their significant role in water conservation, traditional systems such as naulas, dharas, khal, and guhls have been largely neglected in recent years due to the adoption of modern water and irrigation technologies. Consequently, these systems have deteriorated over time-their structures have collapsed, channels have become silted, and water sources have been compromised. The contributing factors include deforestation, rapid urbanization, and the overextraction of groundwater (Jain et al., 2024).
Physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics of traditional water harvesting system.
The physiochemical characteristics of different springs like Teendhara, Bidakot, and Nainital of Garhwal and Kumaon divisions found prominence differences with the BIS standard (Table 2). The pH values of reported springs ranged from 6.5-8.5 which is considered suitable for drinking. However, some areas such as Bhaktiyana and Kothar, have exceeding the mineral content (electrical conductivity) above the desirable limit (500 μs/cm), thus lead to poor taste. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) also pose concern which was documented above the desirable limit (500 mg/l) subsequently affecting the water quality in various region like Kothar Dhara and Hanuman Mandir Dhara in the Garhwal region. The regional significant difference in nitrates and chlorides ion content in water bodies require the periodic monitoring. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals in the springs of Kumaon and Garhwal adversely impact the potability and overall quality of water in these traditional harvesting systems (Table 2).
In the Kumaon region, most of the studied springs exhibited low levels of contamination. However, the Kulgarh spring showed a significantly high iron concentration (3 mg/L), which exceeds the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) permissible limit of 1.0 mg/L. In contrast, springs in the Garhwal region generally exhibited moderate iron levels (0.066-0.068 mg/L), while copper and lead concentrations remained within the recommended limits in key urban areas such as Haridwar, Vikasnagar, and Mussoorie. Nonetheless, high iron concentrations (0.4 mg/L) exceeding the BIS desirable limit were reported in Srikot and Supana. Manganese levels were comparatively higher (0.1 mg/L) in the spring near Satyanarayan Temple in Nainital, aligning with the BIS desirable limit (Table 3).
Microbiological assessments revealed coliform contamination in traditional water harvesting systems in springs of Garhwal (Bhaktiyana, Kothar, and Joshimath), though E. coli was absent. According to BIS guidelines, both coliforms and E. coli should be absent in potable water. The presence of microbial contamination in several springs in the Garhwal region indicates a potential public health concern and underscores the need for regular monitoring and improved water treatment measures.
Threat to Natural water resources. Thakur and co-workers reported over 900 springs, distributed from 222 m to 2600 m above sea level in Uttarakhand. Urbanization, shrinking recharge zones, variation in rainfall pattern and surface runoff are the major threat to traditional water resources specially in Nainital and Udham Singh Nagar districts (Thakur et al., 2022). The changing climatic condition affects the resource water level in the region. The significant decrease in spring water level was recorded in Kumaun region (299 springs) followed by Chamoli (182 springs) and Uttarkashi (136 springs) in the Garhwal region (Fig. 3). The springs water scarcity data in Uttarakhand is presented in Table 4. Water scarcity leads to livelihood challenges, health issues on local communities. For example: Amni-ka-Dhara, a historically significant perennial spring located in the Garhkot watershed of the Tehri Garhwal district, ceased to flow after the 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake. In addition to seismic activity, the degradation of forest cover has further contributed to the decline of such springs by reducing groundwater recharge and the landscape's water retention capacity as reported in Pauri, which once sustained itself through an ancient dhara, now faces acute water scarcity (PSI, 2009).
Impact of Climate change. The variation in weather pattern, rainfall and higher temperatures contributing to disasters that affect agriculture, food security, people welfare, and the ecosystem supporting systems (Tyagi et al., 2022). Approximately 36 % of the springs have declared dried, permanent stream sources have vanished, and the water flow in springs as well as streams has drastically decreased in the last 20 years (Tewari and Tewari, 2023). The traditional water sources like naulas and dharas in Himalayan states contributed significantly as water resource. Therefore, restoration and conservation of these natural resources is crucial for the sustenance of local communities. Significant decrease was reported in spring water recharge, water availability in naulas and dharas due to increased temperature, reduced snowfall and unpredictable rainfall patterns (Rautela and Karki 2015). The drop-in water flow across different districts in Uttarakhand is presented in (Table 5). Some areas like Pauri showed maximum decline in water discharge with 185 schemes followed by Tehri (89) and Champawat (54) district. Concerning the impact intensity, most of the schemes have recorded a decrease of 75-90% reduction which indicate poor availability of water (Table 5). This underlines the necessity of intensive water planning and tackling of natural water resource with reference to climate change.
Conservation Efforts: Governmental, non-governmental and scientific initiatives. In hilly regions like Uttarakhand, local people have been using these water resources (Naulas, Dharas, Khal, and Guhls) since ancient time fulfill the water demand. These resources served for water demand for domestic consumption and support lives in hilly areas. Nevertheless, the proficiency of these systems has declined due abandonment as well as changes in the environment. Pertaining to the issues, the government, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and other scientific organizations have initiated some measures with the aim of rehabilitating and conserving them to continue to support the people that rely on them (Table 6).
Governmental Initiatives.
The Government of Uttarakhand has undertaken several programs like Jal Jeevan Mission to focus on water conservation and rural development (JJM, 2024). Another key intervention is the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG, 2024), which aims to restore the ecological health of the Ganga River and its tributaries. This mission also supports the revival of traditional water harvesting systems, contributing to watershed sustainability. Additionally, state agencies such as the Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan are actively working to restore traditional water harvesting structures like Naulas and Dharas, which historically played a vital role in groundwater recharge and community water supply. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has also implemented afforestation programs following a triad approach in forested areas, emphasizing community participation and ecological restoration (PIB, 2022).
Non-Governmental Initiatives. Various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are actively involved in the restoration of the traditional water harvesting structures in the region (Table 6). Many awareness programs have been conducted regarding the spring inventory and impact monitoring through the Spring Atlas of Uttarakhand by Central Himalayan Rural Action Group (CHIRAG). The Naula Foundation is also involved in rehabilitation of Naulas to ensure the maintenance by indigenous people. People's Science Institute (PSI), Himmotthan, and the Himalayan Environmental Studies and Conservation Organization (HESCO) are working to support community-based waters management systems. They engage with people, authorities, and scientists to achieve the preservation of Naulas, Dharas, and other traditional structures. These organizations not only create awareness, but also educate the societies against the preservation of these natural water resources, cultural and environmental-temporal landscape in the region.
Scientific Initiatives
Researchers have been studying the effectiveness and sustainability of the natural water resources. To ensure safe drinking water, Development Alternatives (World's first social enterprise dedicated to sustainable development) has developed a fast, easy to operate, robust and reliable water testing kit Jal-TARA to check physico-chemical and biological parameters of water (Bhardwaj, 2002). In addition, nanobubble technology may presents eco-friendly techniques to improve the water quality and management practices (Hoque et al., 2025, Esmaili, 2025). Further, to support sustainable water resource planning, GIS mapping of water harvesting system is necessary to track the impact of environmental factors. This technology allows to identify the areas most suitable for rainwater harvesting by considering different factors including land use, soil type, runoff, and slope of the area (Alene et al., 2022). Therefore, development and validation of scientific methods is must to visualize and manage water resources more efficiently, upgradation of traditional techniques to meet modern needs (Abbas et al., 2024). By using these modern scientific tools and knowledge, traditional water harvesting systems continue to support communities in Uttarakhand.
Role of Community and Women Self-Help Groups.
Women play a crucial role in the conservation of traditional water resources, attributed to their close association with natural ecosystems and their in-depth knowledge of local resource availability (Pal and Pooja, 2024). Specially the Self-Help Groups (SHGs) significantly contribute to water management through the exchange of indigenous knowledge and collective resource utilization, thereby enhancing community health and promoting environmental sustainability (Vijayalakshmy et al., 2023). SHGs serve as vital platforms for fostering community participation, encouraging cooperative behavior, and advancing sustainable resource management practices.
The involvement of women in traditional water management not only enhances natural resource governance but also contributes to the social development of local communities (Kumar and Kumar, 2024). Women actively participate in decision-making processes and in the formulation of rules related to water governance during community meetings and local forums (Akolgo and Ayentimi, 2020). Traditionally, the responsibility of water collection for domestic use has primarily fallen on women, particularly in mountainous regions where water sources are often distant and difficult to access. On average, women spend between two to four hours daily fetching water; in some remote areas, this can extend to as much as eight hours. Annually, a woman may walk over 3,000 kilometers solely for water collection (Chauhan, 2010). The case study from Uttarakhand, located in the Indian Himalayas, illustrates how women's Self-Help Groups (SHGs) effectively coordinate community efforts to conserve and revitalize traditional water systems.
Maya Verma from Chanoli, Almora District. Maya Verma, in her village Chanoli along with others woman came together and helped to rejuvenate Naulas and Dharas. They have been restoring the water sources of 15 villages since October 2017, so that they remain filled with water throughout the year. Over the years, they maintain these water resources by frequent cleaning of the debris, mud and silt build up. They also planted broad-leaved trees and drew upon indigenous knowledge to maintain the working order of Naulas as a resource on which their communities rely for drinking water (Roy and Ghosh 2020). This case study significantly reflects the crucial role of women in the preservation of traditional water harvesting systems. Their dedication helps maintain these vital resources, ensuring water security for their communities.
Tools and Techniques used in Water quality Testing. Water quality testing is crucial to ensure the safety and quality of water sources. Various methods and equipment are used to evaluate different water parameters including physio-chemical and biological characteristics (Table 7). The Laser spectroscopy is used to detect organic materials, while conductivity is used to measure total dissolved solids (Tian et al., 2023). For the chemical analysis, ion chromatography is used to analyze anions such as nitrates and sulfates whereas microbiological assessment is also required to detect the absence/absence of pathogenic bacteria (Kaynar et al., 2022). The Nutrient parameters include the measurement of pH, turbidity, dissolved oxygen (DO) through the portable field-testing kits, while spectrophotometers are employed for nitrate, sulfate, and fluoride testing. The quantitative assessment of heavy metals (iron and lead) is analyzed through atomic absorption spectrophotometers (AAS). Microbial tests, including the detection of bacteria like coliform and E. coli, rely on membrane filtration techniques or portable biological kits for on-site analysis. Portable devices are especially essential for field surveys of water quality, as they allow for the rapid assessment of nutrients, metals, and microorganisms. These devices offer convenient with immediate results and provide real-time information, which is critical for timely decision-making and adopting effective and efficient steps for the management of water quality in the hilly areas. Thus, portable testing kits may contribute significantly to ensure the regular monitoring of water quality and identification of associated risks are addressed promptly.
Application of Remote sensing (RS) and Geographical Information System (GIS) in traditional water harvesting system. The integrated use of remotely sensed data, global positioning system, and geographic information systems together have been extensively used for mapping, monitoring and analyzing a variety of natural resources (Dutta et al., 2024). These tools also provide better scope for decision making and developing plans for management applications. Remote sensing techniques can be used to monitor water quality parameters like temperature and suspended sediments (turbidity) (Kumar et al., 2015). Spatial and temporal remote sensing information needed to monitor changes in water quality parameters. Study reaved that RS and GIS techniques are essential for understanding current status of the natural springs of Uttarakhand. They also delineated springshed, and then proposed a comprehensive springshed management plan for the restoration of the natural springs in the region. Detailed analysis was done using ArcGIS and QGIS software in order to create comprehensive maps that show the location and catchment areas of springs, providing important information about the geological structures governing water flow, availability, and even sustainable water management practices (Thakur et al., 2022). The tools and techniques applied in geospatial studies of springs in Uttarakhand and similar regions is given in Table 8. Groundwater potential sites for water harvesting in the district Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India were identified using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Terrains characteristics, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and land use land cover (LULC) mapping were done from satellite imagery like Landsat 9 and ALOS PALSAR in the ArcGIS environment. The different thematic layers like geomorphology, lithology, slope, soil, lineament density, drainage density, and NDVI were allocated a proportional weight through weighted overlay analysis, to delineate the prospective groundwater map of the study area. Then the land was classified into high, moderate, and low groundwater potential zones depicting the efficacy of these techniques in Uttarakhand for water resources and springs management (Thakurlal et al., 2023).
Table 1: Natural Water Sources in Uttarakhand (Gauniya, 2020).
Sr. No. | Name | Source | Purpose/uses |
1. | Naula and Dhara | Natural Water sources | Drinking, Domestic, Irrigation, |
2. | Gadhera | Stream | Drinking, Irrigation |
3. | Gaad | River | Drinking, Domestic, Irrigation, Hydropower |
4. | Guhls | Waterfall | Irrigation |
5. | Dyo | Rainfall | Rainwater Harvesting |
6. | Tal/ Khal/Pokhar/ Simar | Ponds and Lakes | For Animals drinking |
Table 2: Physiochemical analysis of natural water springs from various locations in Garhwal and Kumaun region in Uttarakhand Himalaya.
Region | Location/ Name of Spring | Physiochemical properties | |||||||||||||||
pH | Turbidity (NTU) | EC (μs cm-1) | DO (mg l-1) | BOD (mg l-1) | TDS (mg l-1) | Salinity (mg l-1) | F-(mg l-1) | Alkalinity (mg l -1) | TH (mg l-1) | Ca (mg l-1) | Mg (mg l-1) | NO3(mg l-1) | Cl-(mg l-1) | SO4(mg l-1) | Reference | ||
Garhwal | Teendhara | 7.1 | - | 95 | - | - | 61 | - | - | 50 | 76 | 11 | 12 | ND | ND | 3 | Negi et al. (2007) |
Bidakot | 7.1 | - | 168 | - | - | 108 | - | - | 66 | 100 | 22 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 3 | ||
Karas | 6.9 | - | 93 | - | - | 60 | - | - | 52 | 130 | 18 | 20 | ND | ND | ND | ||
Bhaktiyana | 7.1 | - | 568 | - | - | 364 | - | - | 170 | 276 | 71 | 24 | 7 | 18 | 116 | ||
Kothar | 7.2 | - | 529 | - | - | 338 | - | - | 168 | 262 | 67 | 23 | ND | 4 | 20 | ||
Gulabrai | 7.1 | - | 134 | - | - | 86 | - | - | 70 | 120 | 19 | 18 | ND | ND | 4 | ||
Kamera | 6.9 | - | 82 | - | - | 52 | - | - | 46 | 122 | 25 | 14 | ND | ND | 2 | ||
Chatwapipal | 7.4 | - | 176 | - | - | 113 | - | - | 82 | 92 | 22 | 9 | ND | ND | 7 | ||
Bhatoli | 7.4 | - | 290 | - | - | 185 | - | - | 158 | 158 | 42 | 13 | ND | ND | 7 | ||
Maithana | 6.7 | - | 73 | - | - | 47 | - | - | 36 | 108 | 20 | 14 | ND | ND | 4 | ||
Batula | 6.8 | - | 62 | - | - | 40 | - | - | 40 | 102 | 18 | 14 | ND | ND | 3 | ||
Joshimath | 6.9 | - | 232 | - | - | 148 | - | - | 60 | 128 | 24 | 17 | 21 | 6 | 13 | ||
Garhwal | Kolun Dhara | 6.9 | - | 596 | 2.9 | - | - | - | - | - | 246 | - | - | 5 | 58 | - | Singh et al. (2014) |
Beega Dhara | 6.9 | - | 516 | 2.5 | - | - | - | - | - | 220 | - | - | 6 | 58 | - | ||
Kamleshwar Dhara | 6.9 | - | 684 | 2.8 | - | - | - | - | - | 267 | - | - | 8 | 68 | - | ||
Hanuman Mandir Dhara | 7.1 | - | 530 | 3.05 | - | - | - | - | - | 211 | - | - | 6 | 59 | - | ||
Kothar Dhara | 7.2 | - | 510 | 3.2 | - | - | - | - | - | 218 | - | - | 9 | 60 | - | ||
Kumaon | Dhargara | 7.3 | - | - | - | - | 320 | 190 | - | - | 156 | - | - | 1 | 10 | - | Bisht et al. (2018) |
Ghatghar | 6.4 | - | - | - | - | 110 | 80 | - | - | 48 | - | - | Nil | 202 | - | ||
Salkuli | 7 | - | - | - | - | 200 | 125 | - | - | 96 | - | - | 1 | 32 | - | ||
Kulgarh | 7.5 | - | - | - | - | 170 | 100 | - | - | 96 | - | - | 1 | 16 | - | ||
Mouna Talla | 6.5 | - | - | - | - | 110 | 70 | - | - | 96 | - | - | Nil | 16 | - | ||
Dansil | 6.4 | - | - | - | - | 110 | 80 | - | - | 48 | - | - | 1 | 20 | - | ||
Garhwal | Haridwar | 7.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 275 | 252 | - | - | - | 154 | 198 | Gaur et al. (2011) |
Vikasnagar | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 328 | 282 | - | - | - | 196 | 153 | ||
Mussoorie | 7.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 336 | 329 | - | - | - | 121 | 130 | ||
Dehradun | 7.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 322 | 291 | - | - | - | 289 | 170 | ||
Dakpathar | 7.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 322 | 272 | - | - | - | 185 | 152 | |||
Garhwal | Sweet | 7.2 | 0.65 | - | - | - | 338 | - | 0.2 | 160 | 192 | 58 | 12 | 1.2 | 14 | 18 | Bhandari and Bisht (2022) |
Srikot | 7.5 | 1.55 | - | - | - | 540 | - | 0.4 | 254 | 280 | 92 | 12 | 2.1 | 14 | 24 | ||
Kothar | 7.3 | 0.52 | - | - | - | 349 | - | 0.4 | 152 | 192 | 55 | 14 | 1.2 | 14 | 18 | ||
Hanuman Temple | 6.6 | 0.81 | - | - | - | 414 | - | 0.3 | 148 | 208 | 61 | 14 | 4.5 | 28 | 44 | ||
Kamleshwar Dhara | 6.7 | 0.95 | - | - | - | 480 | - | 0.03 | 256 | 280 | 99 | 9 | 1.2 | 48 | 46 | ||
Bhaktiyana | 6.9 | 1.21 | - | - | - | 460 | - | 0.7 | 256 | 284 | 96 | 11 | 1.4 | 36 | 43 | ||
Ufhlda | 7.1 | 1.36 | - | - | - | 502 | - | 0.6 | 260 | 296 | 99 | 12 | 0 | 20 | 47 | ||
Supana | 7.7 | 0.96 | - | - | - | 236 | - | 0.3 | 106 | 124 | 37 | 8 | 1.2 | 7 | 11 | ||
Barktot | 7.6 | 1.72 | - | - | - | 314 | - | 0.4 | 228 | 260 | 91 | 11 | 0.2 | 16 | 8 | ||
Naithana | 7.7 | 1.12 | - | - | - | 378 | - | 0.4 | 172 | 196 | 60 | 11 | 1.6 | 11 | 16 | ||
Kirtinagar | 7.2 | 1.46 | - | - | - | 426 | - | 0.1 | 244 | 280 | 99 | 12 | 0.1 | 32 | 31 | ||
Kumaon | Nainital (Near Nishant Hostel) | 6.8 | - | - | 3.01 | 0.6 | 10 | - | - | - | - | 100 | - | 1 | - | - | Negi et al. (2022) |
Nainital (Near Ramleela Ground) | 7 | - | - | 3.18 | 0.7 | 12 | - | - | - | - | 34 | - | 0.2 | - | - | ||
Nainital (Near Satyanarayan Temple) | 7.3 | - | - | 3.17 | 0.3 | 14 | - | - | - | - | 186 | - | 0.7 | - | - | ||
Nainital (Near Vimarsh Cottage) | 7 | - | - | 2.86 | 1.4 | 10 | - | - | - | - | 124 | - | 0.7 | - | - | ||
Nainital (Near Bhotiya Band) | 6.5 | - | - | 8.74 | 1 | 13 | - | - | - | - | 108 | - | 0.4 | - | - | ||
Nainital (Near Masjid) | 6.8 | - | - | 2.06 | 1 | 13 | - | - | - | - | 94 | - | 0.3 | - | - | ||
Nainital {Chuna Dhara (A)} | 7 | - | - | 3.12 | 0.4 | 11 | - | - | - | - | 101 | - | 1 | - | - | ||
Nainital {Chuna Dhara (B)} | 7.1 | - | - | 2.95 | 1.2 | 9 | - | - | - | - | 101 | - | 0.2 | - | - | ||
Kumaon | Champawat | 7.7-8.2 | 127-222 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 70-110 | 16-4 | 5-7 | - | 5-9 | - | Bussa et al. (2009) | |
Kumaon | Bageshwar (Banri) | 7.4 | 0 | 434 | - | - | 232 | - | 0.3 | 129 | - | 32 | 38 | 7 | 64 | - | Azam et al. (2022) |
Bageshwar (Manikhet) | 8.0 | 0 | 553 | - | - | 287 | - | 0.5 | 225 | - | 30 | 55 | 5 | 36 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Darsu Aare) | 7.5 | 0 | 267 | - | - | 141 | - | 0.5 | 215 | - | 44 | 13 | 4 | 20 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Kukudagaad- Bahuli) | 7.3 | 0 | 37 | - | - | 19 | - | 0.4 | 89 | - | 12 | 6 | 3 | 50 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Kamedi) | 7.4 | 0 | 142 | - | - | 73 | - | 0.7 | 82 | - | 26 | 11 | 3 | 52 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Shri Naula Dhaara) | 7.9 | 0 | 405 | - | - | 212 | - | 0.5 | 160 | - | 40 | 43 | 10 | 87 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Bilauana) | 8.4 | 0 | 348 | - | - | 185 | - | 0.5 | 190 | - | 50 | 30 | 5 | 53 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Bhaniya Dhaar -1) | 7.8 | 0 | 115 | - | - | 59 | - | 2.5 | 119 | - | 18 | 19 | 2 | 29 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Bhaniya Dhaar -2) | 7.8 | 0 | 78 | - | - | 39 | - | 0.4 | 68 | - | 14 | 12 | 4 | 26 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Bhitaal Gaon) | 7.4 | 0 | 121 | - | - | 61 | - | 0.5 | 90 | - | 2 | 14 | 5 | 53 | - | ||
Bageshwar (Nye Basti Chaurasi) | 8.0 | 0 | 352 | - | - | 184 | - | 0.6 | 157 | - | 38 | 15 | 2 | 54 | - | ||
BIS 10500:2012 Specification | Desirable Limit | 6.5-8.5 | 1 | - | - | - | 500 | - | 1 | 200 | 200 | 75 | 30 | 45 | 250 | 200 | BIS (2012) |
Permissible Limit | NR | 5 | - | - | - | 2000 | - | 1.5 | 600 | 600 | 200 | 100 | NR | 1000 | 400 | ||
Abbreviation: EC- Electrical Conductivity; DO- Dissolved Oxygen; BOD- Biochemical Oxygen Demand; TDS- Total Dissolve Solids; T.H.- Total Hardness; ND- Not Determined; NR- No Relaxation
Table 3: Heavy metal status in natural water springs form various locations in Garhwal and Kumaun region in Uttarakhand Himalaya.
Region | Location/ Name of Spring | Heavy Metals | Reference | ||||||||
Total Iron (mg/l) | Aluminum (mg/l) | Barium (mg/l) | Copper (mg/l) | Cobalt (mg/l) | Manganese (mg/l) | Lead (mg/l) | Cadmium (mg/l) | Chromium (mg/l) | |||
Garhwal | Haridwar | 0.066 | 0.056 | 0.057 | 0.022 | 0.06 | 0.052 | 0.084 | 0.131 | 0.094 | Gaur et al. (2011) |
Vikasnagar | 0.068 | 0.058 | 0.078 | 0.022 | 0.062 | 0.058 | 0.09 | 0.132 | 0.096 | ||
Mussoorie | 0.062 | 0.056 | 0.079 | 0.021 | 0.064 | 0.054 | 0.088 | 0.133 | 0.096 | ||
Dehradun | 0.067 | 0.056 | 0.079 | 0.021 | 0.064 | 0.053 | 0.088 | 0.133 | 0.096 | ||
Dakpathar | 0.064 | 0.056 | 0.078 | 0.018 | 0.06 | 0.054 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.098 | ||
Garhwal | Sweet | 0.12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Bhandari and Bisht (2022) |
Srikot | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Kothar | 0.04 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Hanuman Temple | 0.18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Kamleshwar Dhara | 0.15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Bhaktiyana | 0.12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Ufhlda | 0.14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Supana | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Barktot | 0.08 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Naithana | 0.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Kirtinagar | 0.14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Kumaon | Nainital (Near Nishant Hostel) | - | - | - | - | - | 0.12 | - | - | - | Negi et al. (2022) |
Nainital (Near Ramleela Ground) | - | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | - | - | - | ||
Nainital (Near Satyanarayan Temple) | - | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | - | - | - | ||
Nainital (Near Vimarsh Cottage) | - | - | - | - | - | 0.06 | - | - | - | ||
Nainital (Near Bhotiya Band) | - | - | - | - | - | 0.11 | - | - | - | ||
Nainital (Near Masjid) | - | - | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | - | - | ||
Nainital {Chuna Dhara (A)} | - | - | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | - | - | ||
Nainital {Chuna Dhara (B)} | - | - | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | - | - | ||
Kumaon | Dhargara | Nil | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Bisht et al. (2018) |
Ghatghar | Nil | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Salkuli | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Kulgarh | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Mouna Talla | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Dansil | Nil | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Kumaon | Bageshwar (Banri) | 0.05 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Azam et al. (2022) | |
Bageshwar (Manikhet) | 0.05 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
Bageshwar (Darsu Aare) | 0.04 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
Bageshwar (Kukudagaad- Bahuli) | 0.05 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Bageshwar (Kamedi) | 0.06 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Bageshwar (Shri Naula Dhaara) | 0.05 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Bageshwar (Bilauana) | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Bageshwar (Bhaniya Dhaar -1) | 0.03 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Bageshwar (Bhaniya Dhaar -2) | 0.02 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Bageshwar (Bhitaal Gaon) | 0.02 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Bageshwar (Nye Basti Chaurasi) | 0.04 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
BIS 10500:2012 Specifications | Desirable Limit | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 0.05 | - | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.05 | BIS (2012) |
Permissible Limit | 1.0 | 0.2 | NR | 1.5 | - | 0.3 | NR | NR | NR | ||
Table 4: Statistics of springs and Water Scarcity (WS) data in Uttarakhand.
State | Uttarakhand | Source | |
Water Consumption (lpcpd) | Maximum | 65 | Sundriyal and Rana (2022) |
Minimum | 20 | ||
Average | 35 | ||
Distance to water source (M) | 500 | ||
Major Cause of WS | Mismanagement in water supply; Source dried or turned seasonal; Distance of source; Population growth; Deforestation and developmental (Anthropogenic) activities; Natural hazards | ||
Expected Consequence of WS | Impact on livelihood of people associated with agriculture and animal husbandry; Burden on women; More expenditure in terms of money and time in fetching water; Increase in local conflicts; Health issues. | ||
Suggested Solution of WS | Investment in water infrastructure such as construction of tanks of required capacity; Conservation and harvesting of rainwater; Plantation of oak trees in the catchment | ||
Total Number of Villages | 16793 | Gupta and Kulkarni (2018) | |
Total Number of Villages with Springs | 594 | ||
Percentage of villages which report having springs (%) | 3.5 | ||
Abbreviation used: lpcpd- liter per capita per day, WS- Water Scarcity, M- Meter
Table 5: Schemes across district under Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan with decrease in discharge in last three years (UJS, 2024).
District | 50 to 75% | 75 to 90% | Above 90% | Total |
Dehradun | 6 | 4 | 2 | 12 |
Pauri | 26 | 120 | 39 | 185 |
Chamoli | 15 | 9 | - | 24 |
Rudraprayag | 12 | - | 3 | 15 |
Uttarkashi | 10 | 2 | 1 | 13 |
Tehri | 22 | 47 | 20 | 89 |
Almora | 11 | 25 | 10 | 46 |
Champawat | 7 | 35 | 12 | 54 |
Bageshwar | 3 | 3 | - | 6 |
Nainital | 18 | 7 | - | 25 |
Pithoragarh | 9 | 16 | 6 | 31 |
Total | 139 | 268 | 93 | 500 |
Table 6: Roles and Responsibilities of Organizations Involved in Water Resource Management and Conservation.
Sr. No. | Name of Organization | Name of Institution | Roles and Responsibility |
1. | Government | Central Ground Water Board | Monitoring and managing groundwater resources |
Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan | Managing and Testing of water supply and sanitation services in Uttarakhand. | ||
Uttarakhand Irrigation Department | Developing and maintaining irrigation infrastructure. | ||
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology | Developing strategies for the conservation and sustainable management of spring water resources. | ||
2. | Non-Government Organization | People's Science Institute | Conducting research and community-based projects on water harvesting. |
Himmotthan Society | Promoting sustainable water management and livelihood projects. | ||
Himalayan Environmental Studies and Conservation Organization (HESCO) | Implementing eco-friendly water conservation projects. | ||
Central Himalayan Rural Action Group (CHIRAG) | Working on water conservation and rural development projects. | ||
Central Himalayan Environment Association (CHEA) | Promoting environmental conservation and sustainable development in the Himalayan region. | ||
Self Help Groups (SHGs) | Promoting community engagement and sustainable practices, also promoting women's empowerment and socio-economic development and facilitate better management of water resources. | ||
3. | Scientific Organization | Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee | Developing innovative water harvesting technologies and providing technical and financial support. |
Advances Centre for Water Resources Development and Management | Contributed as a knowledge partner in most initiatives by providing scientific and technical knowledge and conducting training. |
Table 7: Techniques and analytic parameters used in water quality testing.
Water characteristics | Name of Parameters | Instrument Name |
Nutrients | pH | pH meter, pH paper/strips |
Turbidity | Turbidity meter, Nephelometer | |
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) | TDS meter, Gravimetric analysis | |
Electrical Conductivity | Conductivity meter | |
Alkalinity | Titration Method using sulfuric acid | |
Calcium and Magnesium | Flame photometer and Titration method using EDTA | |
Salinity | Refractometer, Conductivity meter, Drop Titration | |
Fluoride, chloride, Sulphate and nitrate | Spectrophotometer, Color Comparator | |
Total Hardness | Titration method using EDTA | |
Air | Dissolved Oxygen (DO) | DO Meter, Drop Titration |
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) | BOD Analyzer, Incubator | |
Heavy Metals | Total Iron, Barium, | Spectrophotometer, Color Comparator |
Aluminum, Copper, cobalt, Manganese, Lead, Cadmium, Chromium, Zinc | Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, Color Comparator | |
Biological | Bacteria, Coliform, E. coli, Salmonella, Vibrio, Citrobacter, Shigella | Most Probable number (MPN) method, Membrane Filtration Method, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), Multiple tube fermentation method, Agar plate method |
Table 8: Tools and Techniques of remote sensing (RS) and geographical information system (GIS) used in springs mapping, analysis and decision making
Category | Tools/ Software | Techniques | Purpose | Reference |
Geospatial Analysis | ArcGIS, QGIS, Google Earth Pro | Mapping and delineating springsheds | Identifying recharge areas and catchments | Thakur et al. (2022) |
Satellite Imagery | Landsat, Sentinel-2 | Analyzing land use/land cover (LULC) changes | Understanding vegetation and land use impact on spring | Dhakal et al. (2022) |
Topographic Analysis | Digital Elevation Models (SRTM, ASTER) | Generating slope, aspect, and elevation maps | Evaluating terrain characteristics influencing water flow | Dalponte et al. (2024) |
Change Detection | Earth Resources Data Analysis System (ERDAS) Imagine | Multi-temporal satellite image analysis | Monitoring changes in recharge zones and spring health | Moisa et al. (20230 |
Fig. 1. Traditional water harvesting systems in Uttarakhand (a) Dhara, (b) Ufalda Dhara (c) Khal Dugout for Storing Water.
Source: https://connectingheritage.com/articleandnews/articles/uttarakhand
Fig. 2. Basic layout and components of different Naulas found in Uttarakhand Himalaya.
Image source: A, B and C: Bhandari and Kaur, 2023.
Fig. 3. Drying of springs across the districts (National Water Mission, 2018)
Traditional water harvesting systems hold immense cultural, environmental, and practical significance. They have supported communities for centuries by providing a sustainable source of water. However, due to changing climatic conditions and other socio-economic factors, their existence is at risk. The impact of climatic and environmental factors has significant reduction in water availability however, the conservation efforts by various organization including government bodies, NGOs, and local communities aims to preserve these systems. Women play a crucial role in maintaining and reviving traditional water sources, underscoring the importance of collective and gender-inclusive conservation practices. Protecting these traditional resources also contributed in maintenance of the rich heritage due to associated significant cultural beliefs as well as to ensure water security for future generations. Further, frequent monitoring of these resources is necessary to improve the water quality and health of local communities in the hilly states of Himalayan region where major population depends on the natural resource for their survival. Conservation and restoration of traditional water harvesting systems are associated with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 6) with aim to ensure the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all (UN, 2018). Sustainable management of water resources has significant contribution to other Sustainable Development Goals to achieve balance between the growing social, economic, and ecological needs of an increasing global population (Selvaraj et al., 2022). Promoting sustainable water management, enhancing food security, and improving community resilience against climate change, thereby ensuring equitable access to water resources for future generations (Dube et al., 2013).
Abbas, A. I., Nile, B. K. and Hassan, W. H. (2024). Visualizing sustainable rainwater harvesting: A case study of Karbala Province. Open Engineering, 14(1), 20240009.
Abraham, M. and Priyadarshini, B. (2024). Rainwater harvesting for sustainable water management. In: Futuristic Trends in Agriculture Engineering and Food Sciences, IIP Series, 19(3), 59–64.
Admin. (2021). Water Conservation and Management Systems in Uttarakhand. Connecting Heritage.
Akolgo, E. A. and Ayentimi, D. T. (2020). Community level mechanism and strategies for managing sustainable water supply system lessons from Bongo district of northern Ghana. Environment Development and Sustainability, 22(4), 3739–3756.
Alene, A., Yibeltal, M., Abera, A., Andualem, T. G. and Lee, S. S. (2022). Identifying rainwater harvesting sites using integrated GIS and a multi-criteria evaluation approach in semi-arid areas of Ethiopia. Applied Water Science 12(10), 238.
ASI (2022). Archaeological Survey of India, The Gazette of India-No. CG-DL-E-22072022-237456.
Azam, M., Prasad, and Prasad, H. J. S. (2022). Evaluation of spring water quality using water quality index method for Bageshwar District, Uttarakhand, India. Environment Conservation Journal, 23(1–2), 370–379.
Baker, J. (1997). Common Property Resource Theory and the Kuhl Irrigation Systems of Himachal Pradesh, India. Human Organization, 56(2), 199–208.
Banskota, M. (1999). Social Aspects and Local Water-harvesting Systems: A Review of the Prevailing Systems in Hindu Kush-Himalayan Communities. In Water of Life- Perspective of water harvesting in the HKH.
Bhandari, S. and Kaur, H. (2023). Conservation Strategies for the Traditional Water Systems: A case of Almora City, Uttarakhand. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A 104(4), 807–817.
Bhandari, S. and Bisht, K. S. (2022). Water Quality Assessment of Springs in the Srinagar Valley, Garhwal Himalaya, India. International Journal of Science and Research, 11(11), 1051–1058.
Bhardwaj, N. (2002). TARA Water Quality Testing Products. In TARA Special. Development Alternatives Group, 12(7).
Bhattacharya, S. (2015). Traditional Water Harvesting Structures and Sustainable Water Management in India: A Socio-Hydrological Review. International Letters of Natural Sciences, 37, 30–38.
BIS (2012). Bureau of Indian Standard. Indian Standard Drinking Water- Specification (Second Revision). https://cpcb.nic.in/wqm/BIS_Drinking_Water_Specification.pdf (accessed on 3 December 2024).
Bisht, B. S., Raikwal, B. S., Varma, G. and Palur, S. (2018). Spring Atlas of Uttarakhand, CHIRAG, Central Himalayan Rural Action Group.
Bussa, R., Gupta, A. and Singh, R. P. (2009). Groundwater Brochure of Champawat District, Uttarakhand. Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.
Chakraborty, R. (2017). Issues of water in India and the Health Capability Paradigm. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 17(1), 41–50.
Chauhan, M. (2010). A Perspective on Watershed Development in the Central Himalayan State of Uttarakhand, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 36(4), 253–269.
Chopra, R. (2003). Survival Lessons, Himalayan Jal Sanskriti. Peoples’s Science Institute.
Dalponte, M., Marinelli, D. and Solano-Correa, Y. T. (2024). Effect of DEM Used for Terrain Correction on Forest Windthrow Detection Using COSMO SkyMed Data. Remote Sensing, 16(22), 4309.
Dastorani, M. T. and Poormohammadi, S. (2012). Evaluation of Water Balance in a Mountain Upland Catchment Using SEBAL Approach. Water Resources Management, 26(7), 2069–2080.
Dhakal, S., Kandel, S., Puri, L. and Shrestha, S. (2022). Assessment on Land Use Land Cover Mapping: Sentinel-2 Versus Landsat-9. Forestry: Journal of Institute of Forestry, Nepal, 19(01), 56–63.
Dube, D. K., Reddy, R. U. and Yadav, R. H. (2013). Ground Water Harvesting through Traditional Water Harvesting Technology: Adopting Himalayan Practices in Ethiopian Highlands. International Journal of Geosciences, 4(6), 30–37.
Dutta, J., Medhi, S., Gogoi, M., Borgohain, L., Abdel, M. N. G. and Muhameed, H. M. (2024). Application of Remote Sensing and GIS in Environmental Monitoring and Management. In Advances in geospatial technologies book series, pp.1–34.
Esmaili, M. M. (2025). Nanobubble Technology and Its Applications in Water Consumption Management In Iran: A Novel Solution to the Water Crisis. Nanoscale and Advanced Materials, 2(1), 84-92.
Hoque, M., Hussain, J., Singh, L.S., Chetia, B. R. and Iqbal, G. (2025). Nanobubble Technology in Fisheries and Aquaculture: A Sustainable Solution for Enhanced Productivity and Water Quality Management. Biological Forum, 17(4), 37-43.
Gauniya, G. S. (2020). Restoration and Preservation of Traditional Water Sources in Uttarakhand. Shodh Sarita, 7(26(III)), 197–200.
Gaur, S., Joshi, M. C., Saxena, S. K. and Dutt, H. K. (2011). Analytical study of water safety parameters in ground water samples of Uttarakhand in India. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 1(09), 166–169.
Golmohammadi, G., Prasher, S., Madani, A. and Rudra, R. (2014). Evaluating three hydrological distributed watershed models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Hydrology, 1(1), 20–39.
Greenberg, M. R. (2009). Why is water an issue? American Journal of Public Health, 99(11), 1927.
Gupta, A. and Kulkarni, H. (2018). NITI Aayog Report of Working Group I Inventory and Revival of Springs in the Himalayas for Water security.
Hogeboom, R. J. (2020). The Water Footprint Concept and Water’s Grand Environmental Challenges. One Earth 2(3), 218–222.
Jain, S., Srivastava, A., Vishwakarma, D. K., Rajput, J., Rane, N. L., Salem, A. and Elbeltagi, A. (2024). Protecting ancient water harvesting technologies in India: strategies for climate adaptation and sustainable development with global lessons. Frontiers in Water 6.
JJM (2024) Jal Jeevan Mission. Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation Ministry of Jal Shakti.
Joshi, N. C. (2018). Saving traditional water harvesting systems in Uttarakhand. Down to Earth.
Joshi, S. (2019). Naula: A Tremendous example of architecture and religious belief (Special reference to Almora). In: International seminar on Indian Culture and Its Global Influence at SSJ, Campus, Kumaun University.
Kaynar, P. M., Demli, F., Orhan, G. and Ilter, H. (2022). Chemical and microbiological assessment of drinking water quality. African Health Sciences, 22(4), 648–652.
Kumar, N., Yamac, S. S. and Velmurugan, A. (2015). Applications of Remote Sensing and GIS in Natural Resource Management. Journal of the Andaman Science Association, 20, 1–6.
Kumar, R. and Kumar, B. (2024). Empowering Communities: A Socio-Economic Analysis of Self-Help Groups (SHGs). International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 6(3), 1–8.
Liu, S., Xia, S., Zhang, X., Cai, X., Yang, J., Hu, Y., Zhou, S. and Wang, H. (2024). Microbial communities exhibit distinct diversities and assembly mechanisms in rainwater and tap-water storage systems. Water Research, 253, 121305.
Moisa, M. B., Gurmessa, M. M., Negasa, G. F., Oljira, D. G., Dinsa, M. L., Deribew, K. T., Roba, Z. R. and Gemeda, D. O. (2023). Evaluation of the groundwater recharge potential zone by using GIS and remote sensing in Ziway Abijata sub-basin, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Water Supply, 23(8), 3416–3431.
Molden, D., Hurni, H., Zimmermann, A. and Von D. S. W. (2013). Focus issue: Water governance in mountains. Mountain Research and Development, 33(3), 193–194.
National Water Mission (2018) Report on State Specific Action Plan for Water Sector Uttarakhand. Irrigation Research Institute (IRI), Roorkee, Irrigation Department.
Negi, G. C. S. and Kandpal, K. D. (2003). Traditional methods of water management in the central Himalayan agriculture. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 2(3), 256–264.
Negi, G. C. S., Joshi, V., Nayal, M. and Sati, M. (2007). Geo-Hydrological Studies for Augmentation of Spring Discharge in the Western Himalaya, Final Technical Report, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.
Negi, P. S., Singh, R. and Mishra, A. P. (2022). An Assessment of Water Quality of Nainital Springs, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Indian Association for Environmental Management 42(4), 17–23.
NMCG (2024) National Mission for Clean Ganga. Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India. https://www.nmcg.nic.in/about_nmcg.aspx (accessed on 3 December 2024).
Oli, K. P. & Dhakal, T. D. (2008). Traditional Knowledge in the Himalayan Region. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Nepal.
Pal, A. and Pooja (2024). Women’s Leadership in Preserving Uttarakhand’s Biodiversity: Harnessing Traditional Knowledge. Journal of Mountain Research, 19(1), 99–106.
Patil, S., Kulkarni, H. and Barola, Y. (2018). Spring shed restoration in Kalsi block of Dehradun district under the programme “Strengthening state strategies on climate action through practicing climate resilient practices”. Advanced center for water resources development and management, ACWADAM technical report no. ACWA/Hydro/2018/H72.
Patni, K., Pande, A. P. and Pande, C. (2022). Physicochemical Investigation of Some Primitive Water Sources in District Champawat for Portability and Preservation of Historical Aesthetics, Uttarakhand, India. The Holistic Approach to Environment, 12(1), 1–8.
PIB (2022). Renovation of Traditional Water Bodies, Ministry of Jal Shakti. Press Information Bureau, Government of India.
PSI (2009). Survival lessons Water management traditions in the Central Western Himalayas People’s Science Institute, Dehradun.
Rautela, P. and Karki, B. (2015). Impact of Climate Change on Life and Livelihood of Indigenous People of Higher Himalaya in Uttarakhand, India. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 3(4), 112–124.
Rawat, A. S. and Sah, R. (2009). Traditional knowledge of water management in Kumaon Himalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 8(2), 249–254.
Rawat, J. (2021). Naula – The Traditional Water Harvesting System of Uttarakhand. Euttarakhand.
Roy, S. and Ghosh, A. (2020). Women Revive Traditional Water Sources in Uttarakhand. Tennessee Tribune.
Saha, S., Deka, N. and Bhagabati, A. K. (2021). Traditional Water Management System and Agricultural Sustainability in a Himalayan Foothill Village of Assam, India. In: Rukhsana, Haldar A, Alam A and Satpati L (Eds.), Habitat, Ecology and Ekistics. Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research Springer, Cham, pp. 279–292.
Selvaraj, T., Devadas, P., Perumal, J. L., Zabaniotou, A. and Ganesapillai, M. (2022). A Comprehensive Review of the Potential of Stepwells as Sustainable Water Management Structures. Water, 14(17), 2665.
Sharma, B. (2016). Sustainable Drinking Water Resources in Difficult Topography of Hilly State Uttarakhand India. American Journal of Water Resources, 4(1), 16–21.
Sharma, D. (2014). Potable Water Privation and Health Issues in Varanasi District. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 5(2), 35–43.
Sharma, M., Sharma, N. and Sharma, A. (2023). Restoration and Preservation of Traditional Water Resources: A Study of Uttarakhand. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 01(05), 255–259.
Singh, P., Shokeen, S. and Mishra, M. (2022). Issues and Challenges in Implementation of Jal Jeevan Mission and Best Practices Adopted for Water Resource Sustainability in Hilly Region of Uttarakhand. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communication (ICICC).
Singh, S., Negi, R. S. and Dhanai, R. (2014). A study of physico-chemical parameters of springs around Srinagar Garhwal valley, Uttarakhand. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, 2(4), 3885–3887.
Sundriyal, Y. and Rana, N. (2022) Project Report on Water Conservation and Harvesting Strategies (Theme – V), A Study of Indian Himalayan Region (IHR), Indian Himalayan Central Universities Consortium (IHCUC), NITI Aayog.
Suri, A. and Mamta (2022). Water Management: Towards Sustainable Solutions. Panjab University Research Journal (Arts), XLIX, 73–94.
Tanik, A. and Hanedar, A. (2024). Importance of Rainwater Harvesting as an Alternative Water Resource and its Potential in Türkiye. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 10(8), 1324–1335.
Tewari, B. and Tewari, A. (2023). Spring shed development by employing traditional practices for spring revival and reducing women drudgery in Kumaun Himalayan Region. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 29, 120–127.
Thakur, P. K., Kumar, V., Kumar, S., Kumar, Thakur, P., Thakur, V. and Bhaghel, T. (2022). Application of Remote sensing and GIS for Natural Springs Restoration Planning: A case study of Uttarakhand. International Symposium on Earth Resources and Geo-Environmental Technology.
Thakurlal, L. N., Susheel, A. M., Samad, A., Alam, M., Ansari, M. I. and Lohani, A. K. (2023). Geospatial and AHP techniques for selection of potential zones for water harvesting in Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Journal of Indian Water Resource Society, 43(1-2), 16–22.
Tian, Z., Chen, H., Ding, Q., Che, X., Bi, Z. and Wang, L. (2023). Research on Small-Scale Detection Instrument for Drinking Water Combined Laser Spectroscopy and Conductivity Technology. Sensors, 23(6), 2985.
Tyagi, N., Jayal, T., Singh, M., Mandwal, V., Saini, A., Nirbhav, S. N. and Nayak, S. (2022). Evaluation of Observed and Future Climate Change Projection for Uttarakhand, India, Using CORDEX-SA. Atmosphere, 13(6): 947.
UJS (2024) List of Schemes, Discharge decreased more than 50% in last 3 years. Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan, Government of Uttarakhand.
UN (2018) United Nations. Sustainable development goal 6: Synthesis report 2018 on water and sanitation. United Nations Publications.
Rohendra Singh, H.C. Joshi, Khashti Dasila, Neha Tiwari, Deepti Negi and Prashant Singh (2025). Cultural Significance and Conservation Challenges of Traditional Water Harvesting Systems of Uttarakhand Himalaya: A Critical Review. Biological Forum, 17(5): 111-123.