Author:
Singh B.1*, Gaur R.K.2, Jakhar A.3 and Chauhan R.3
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(10): 89-93, 2024
Address:
1SNIATTE, DEE, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India.
2KVK, Rohtak, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (Haryana), India.
3Department of Entomology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (Haryana), India.
(Corresponding author: Singh B.*)
DOI: -
Subjecting fruits and vegetables to effective decontamination methods is crucial for reducing the risks posed by the indiscriminate use of pesticides. In this context, a study was conducted on decontamination of λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits. λ-cyhalothrin was applied in okra crop twice at recommended dose (15 g a.i. ha-¹) and double dose (30 g a.i. ha-¹). Okra fruit samples were collected from each treatment 0 (2 h), 1 and 3 day(s) after second spray and subjected to various decontamination methods. The residues in the processed fruits were analyzed using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. All the decontamination methods were effective in removing λ-cyhalothrin residues from okra fruits, however, washing followed by boiling okra fruits removing maximum residues (53-72%) proved to be the most effective, followed by dipping in 2 per cent salt solution (52-68%) and 2 per cent tamarind solution (48-65%). Conversely, only washing okra fruits under tap water was the least effective method of decontamination.
Okra, λ-cyhalothrin, residue, decontamination, GCMS/MS.
Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) is an economically important vegetable crop cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide. Its pods are a rich source of essential minerals like potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium, while being low in cholesterol and saturated fats (Habtemariam, 2019). One of the major setbacks identified in the production of okra is the increasing incidence of insect pests as more than 72 species of insect pests and mites have been documented to infest the okra crop (Mishra et al., 2002). To combat the problem of insect pests, farmers primarily use chemical pesticides, and they do so at far higher doses than recommended (Kabadad and Gali 2018). A wide range of pesticides including λ-cyhalothrin have been evaluated to minimize losses due to pests. λ-cyhalothrin (S)-a-cyano3-phenoxy benzyl-(Z)-(1R,3 R)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro prop-1-enyl)-2,2 dimethyl cyclopropane carboxylate is a new synthetic pyrethroid. Owing to its relatively low toxicity and high knock down effect, this insecticide is extensively used in agriculture (Chauhan et al., 2012). It has been reported very effective against a wide range of chewing and sucking insect pests, particularly lepidopterous, coleopterous and mite pests in fruits, vegetables and other field crops (Dikshit et al., 2000; Mathirajan et al., 2000).
However, use of pesticides presents substantial risks to both the environment and public health (Riyaz et al., 2022; Ahmad et al., 2024). Okra being a fast growing crop is harvested at very short interval of 2-3 days and this increases the chance of fruits having high level of residues which can pose health hazards to the consumers (Mariappan and Kaithamalai 2020). Therefore, before consuming okra fruits, these should be subjected to some culinary process for reducing the pesticide risk. Additionally, common decontamination processes such as washing with tap water or using salt or tamarind solutions have been reported to reduce residue levels significantly (Mariappan and Kaithamalai 2020). Hence, in order to develop effective and affordable risk mitigation methods that can be easily implemented at home, the present study on decontamination of λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits was conducted.
The present study was conducted at Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India during 2019.
A. Field experiment.
The field experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with a plot size of 5 × 4 m. Okra (variety Hisar Naveen) was grown following recommended agronomic practices (Anonymous 2013). λ-cyhalothrin 5 EC was applied in okra at recommended dose (15 g a.i. ha-1) and double the recommended dose (30 g a.i. ha-1) twice, first at fruit initiation, followed by a second spray at 15 days interval. One treatment was kept as control in which no insecticide was applied. Three replications were maintained for each treatment.
B. Sampling and processing
Okra fruit samples (500 g) were collected 0 (2 h), 1 and 3 day(s) after application of second spray from the treatments including recommended and double the recommended dose of λ-cyhalothrin. For removal of pesticide residues, okra fruits were subjected to various decontamination processes such as only washing under tap water, washing followed by boiling, dipping in lukewarm water, 2 per cent salt (NaCl) solution, 2 per cent tamarind solution, lemon water (1 lemon/1 litre) and 1 per cent vinegar solution for five minutes followed by washing under tap water. Okra fruits not subjected to any decontamination process were treated as control/unwashed. Each treatment was replicated thrice.
C. Extraction and clean-up of residues
After subjecting to various decontamination processes, okra fruit samples were processed by liquid-liquid partitioning method. For extraction of residues in okra fruits, a representative sample of 20 g chopped and macerated fruits were taken in a flask and 100 ml of acetone was added to it. Then such flasks were shaken for one hour on the mechanical shaker and extract was filtered through Buchner funnel. The filtered extract was transferred to 1litre separatory funnel. A 450 ml of brine solution (10% NaCl) was added to it and partitioned twice, first with dichloromethane (100 and 50 ml) and then hexane (100 and 50 ml) by vigorous shaking for 5 minutes to remove the non-emulsifying impurities. Each time, organic phase was collected and passed through 2-3 cm pad of anhydrous sodium sulphate to remove the trace amount of moisture and pooled together. Then 0.3 mg activated charcoal was added to this extract (for absorbing coloured impurities present in the sample) and left for 4 hours. The extract was filtered using Whatman no.44 filter paper. The organic layer was concentrated near to dryness on rotary vacuum flask evaporator and final volume of 3 ml was made with n-hexane. Cleaning of the okra fruit extract was done by column chromatography. Glass column (60 cm 9 2.2 mm i.d.) was packed with adsorbent mixture of florisil and activated charcoal (3:0.3 w/w) in between two layers (1 cm) of anhydrous sodium sulphate. The column was pre-wetted with 40 ml hexane. The extract was transferred to the column and eluted with 100 ml solution of hexane: acetone (9:1 v/v). The eluate so obtained was concentrated near to complete dryness on rotary vacuum evaporator and reconstituted the final volume of 3 ml using n-hexane.
D. Residue estimation
GC-MS/MS system based on chromatographic technique was used for estimation of λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits. The system was standardised preceding to estimation of insecticide residue. GC analysis was performed by using software GCMS solution version 2.53 SU3. The column used was Rtx-5 (Length-30 m, film thickness-0.25 µm,). Helium was used as carrier gas with flow rate of 21 ml min-1. and injection volume was 1µl. The retention time of λ-cyhalothrin recorded was 22.152 minutes. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.005 and 0.01 mg kg-1, respectively (Table 1). λ-cyhalothrin residues were calculated as under:
Residue (mg kg-1) = (A1× C × I1 × F)/(A2 × W × I2)
Where, A1 = Peak area of the sample, A2 = Peak area of the standard, I1 = Injected volume of standard (µl), I2 = Injected volume of sample (µl), C = Concentration of standard solution (mg/l), F = Final volume of the sample (ml) and W= Weight of the sample (kg).
E. Method validation
To check the validity and authenticity of the method used for estimation of λ-cyhalothrin residue in okra fruits, a recovery experiment was conducted at different spiking levels. For this purpose, 20 g of crushed okra fruits was taken from the samples collected from the control plots and fortified with CRM (certified reference material) of λ-cyhalothrin at three different levels i.e., 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10 mg kg-1. The percentage recovery at each fortification level was estimated using the prescribed processing and analytical procedure.
A. Method validation
The average recovery of λ-cyhalothrin residue in okra fruit samples was 89.07, 90.20 and 94.92 per cent when samples were fortified at level of 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10 mg kg-1, respectively (Table 2). Taking into account the satisfactory recovery percentage (70-110%) and RSD (< 20), the method was considered suitable for the assessment of λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits (SANCO 2011). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was found to be 0.01 mg kg–1. Similarly, in another study 87 to 92 per cent and 97 to 101 per cent recovery of lambda-cyhalothrin was reported in tomato fruits when fortified at the level of 0.25 mg kg-1 and 0.50 ug g-1, respectively (Chauhan et al., 2012).
B. Decontamination of λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits
At recommended dose: Following the application of λ-cyhalothrin at recommended dose (15 g a.i. ha-1), the average initial deposits of 0.079, 0.042 and 0.027 mg kg-1 were detected in okra fruit samples collected 0 (2 h), 1 and 3 day(s) after spray, respectively (Table 3). All the decontamination processes were effective in reducing λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits when samples collected 0 (2 h) and 1 day were processed. However, λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits collected 3 days after spraying and subjected to various decontamination processes, were below the limit of quantification in case of all the treatments. Among all, washing followed by boiling of okra fruits was most effective and resulted in maximum removal of residues i.e., 72.15 and 64.29 per cent when samples collected on 0 and 1 day after spray were processed, respectively. Dipping okra fruits in 2 per cent salt solution and then washing under tap water caused 67.09 and 59.52 per cent reduction in residues in okra fruits collected at respective interval and was next in the order of effectiveness, followed by dipping in 2 per cent tamarind solution (65.82 and 57.14 %), lukewarm water (58.23 and 54.76 %), lemon water (59.49 and 52.38 %) and 1 per cent vinegar solution (54.43 and 50 %), and then washing under tap water. In contrast, only washing under tap water removing 51.90 and 42.86 per cent of residues in samples collected on 0 and 1 day after spray, respectively was least effective method of decontamination.
At double the recommended dose: In case of double the recommended dose (30 g a.i. ha-1), the average initial residues of 0.162, 0.089 and 0.058 mg kg-1 were detected in okra fruit samples collected 0 (2 h), 1 and 3 day(s) after spray, respectively (Table 4). Likewise, washing followed by boiling of okra fruits was most effective method of decontamination and caused maximum reduction i.e., 72.22, 65.17 and 53.45 per cent in fruits samples collected at respective interval. Dipping okra fruits in 2 per cent salt solution and then washing under tap water removed 67.90, 59.55 and 51.72 per cent of residues at respective interval, and was next effective method, followed by dipping in 2 per cent tamarind solution (64.81, 56.18 and 48.28%), lukewarm water (59.03, 52.81 and 46.55%), lemon water (61.73, 49.44 and 41.33%) and 1 per cent vinegar solution (55.56, 47.19 and 39.66%), and then washing under tap water. Similarly, only washing under tap water was least effective and reduced the residues by only 45.06, 38.20 and 27.59 per cent in fruit samples collected 0 (2 h), 1 and 3 day(s) after spray, respectively.
These results are in close proximity of earlier studies in which also washing followed by boiling was reported to be more effective in removing of λ-cyhalothrin residues than only washing of tomato fruits (Chauhan et al., 2012). Similarly, in case of brinjal, cooking of fruits resulted in maximum removal of λ-cyhalothrin residues, followed by dipping in 2 per cent salt solution, lemon water wash, tap water wash and dipping in 2 per cent tamarind solution (Rao et al., 2014). In contrast, dipping of field bean pods in salt solution (2%) followed by tap water wash was reported to be more effective in removal of λ-cyhalothrin residues than cooking in pressure cooker followed by tap water wash, however, tap water wash as least effective method (Srinivasa et al., 2018). In another studies, processing of fruits with 2 per cent salt solution resulted in 48.02 per cent removal of λ-cyhalothrin residues in tomato (Kelageri et al., 2017) while 42.57 per cent in green chilli (Baby Rani et al., 2019).
Table 1: Parameters of GC-MS/MS used for residue study.
Parameters | Details | |
Software | GCMS solution version 2.53 SU3 | |
Column | Rtx-5 MS -1(30m × 0.32 mm 1D X 0.25 µm film thickness) of 5 per cent diphenyl + 95 per cent dimethyl polysiloxane | |
Temperature | ||
Oven | 80o (2 min) 20oC min-1 180 (0 min) 5oC min-1 300o | |
Iron source temp. | 250oC | |
Interface temp. | 270oC | |
Rates of Gas flow | ||
Carrier gas | Helium | |
Via column | 1-46 ml min-1 | |
Total flow | 21 ml min-1 | |
Pressure | 250 k pa, high | |
Split ratio | Split less mode | |
Limit of detection (LOD) | 0.005 mg kg-1 | |
Limit of quantification (LOQ) | 0.01 mg kg-1 | |
Rt for ready mix formulation | λ-cyhalothrin: 22.152 | |
Table 2: Recovery of λ-cyhalothrin in fortified okra fruits
Fortification level (mg kg-1) | Recovery (%) (Mean ± SD) | RSD (%) |
0.01 | 89.07 ± 4.55 | 5.11 |
0.05 | 90.20 ± 4.00 | 4.43 |
0.10 | 94.92 ± 2.68 | 2.82 |
Table 3: Efficiency of decontamination methods in reduction of λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits at recommended dose (15 g a.i. ha-1).
Decontamination method | 0 D (2 h) | 1 D | 3 D | ||||||
Residues (mg kg-1) Mean + SD | Reduction (%) | Residues (mg kg-1) Mean + SD | Reduction (%) | Residues (mg kg-1) Mean + SD | Reduction (%) | ||||
Unwashed | 0.079 + 0.005 | — | 0.042 + 0.006 | — | 0.027 + 0.003 | — | |||
Tap water washing | 0.038 + 0.006 | 51.90 | 0.024 + 0.006 | 42.86 | <LOQ | — | |||
Luke warm water | 0.033 + 0.005 | 58.23 | 0.019 + 0.005 | 54.76 | <LOQ | — | |||
Saline solution (2%) | 0.026 + 0.003 | 67.09 | 0.017 + 0.004 | 59.52 | <LOQ | — | |||
Tamarind solution (2%) | 0.027 + 0.006 | 65.82 | 0.018 + 0.005 | 57.14 | <LOQ | — | |||
Lemon water | 0.032 + 0.006 | 59.49 | 0.020 + 0.006 | 52.38 | <LOQ | — | |||
Vinegar solution (1%) | 0.036 + 0.004 | 54.43 | 0.021+ 0.006 | 50.00 | <LOQ | — | |||
Washing + Boiling | 0.022 + 0.005 | 72.15 | 0.015 + 0.003 | 64.29 | <LOQ | — | |||
D = Day(s) after spray
Table 4: Efficiency of decontamination methods in reduction of λ-cyhalothrin residues in okra fruits at double the recommended dose (30 g a.i. ha-1).
Decontamination method | 0 D (2 h) | 1 D | 3 D | ||||||
Residues (mg kg-1) Mean + SD | Reduction (%) | Residues (mg kg-1) Mean + SD | Reduction (%) | Residues (mg kg-1) Mean + SD | Reduction (%) | ||||
Unwashed | 0.162 + 0.007 | — | 0.089 + 0.006 | — | 0.058 + 0.006 | — | |||
Tap water washing | 0.089 + 0.006 | 45.06 | 0.055 + 0.005 | 38.20 | 0.042 + 0.006 | 27.59 | |||
Luke warm water | 0.066 + 0.006 | 59.03 | 0.042 + 0.007 | 52.81 | 0.031 + 0.005 | 46.55 | |||
Saline solution (2%) | 0.052 + 0.006 | 67.90 | 0.036 + 0.005 | 59.55 | 0.028 + 0.006 | 51.72 | |||
Tamarind solution (2%) | 0.057 + 0.005 | 64.81 | 0.039 + 0.005 | 56.18 | 0.030 + 0.005 | 48.28 | |||
Lemon water | 0.062 + 0.004 | 61.73 | 0.045 + 0.006 | 49.44 | 0.034 + 0.005 | 41.33 | |||
Vinegar solution (1%) | 0.072 + 0.005 | 55.56 | 0.047 + 0.005 | 47.19 | 0.035 + 0.005 | 39.66 | |||
Washing + Boiling | 0.045 + 0.004 | 72.22 | 0.031 + 0.004 | 65.17 | 0.027 + 0.004 | 53.45 | |||
D = Day(s) after spray
The similar studies may be conducted for mitigation of pesticides risk in other vegetables as well as fruits. Apart from this, other possible household processes many also be explored for this purpose.
Ahmad, M. F., Ahmad, F. A., Alsayegh, A. A., Zeyaullah, M., AlShahrani, A. M., Muzammil, K. (2024). Pesticides impacts on human health and the environment with their mechanisms of action and possible countermeasures. Heliyon, 10 (7), e29128.
Anonymous (2013) Package of practices for flower, fruit and vegetable crop production and preservation. Directorate of Extension Education, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India, pp 165-169
Baby Rani, G., Naga Satya Sri, C. H., Rishita. Y., Nirmali Saikia and Sreenivasa Rao, C. H. (2019). Domestic methods for the removal of pesticide residues in chilies. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(4), 2690-2693.
Chauhan, R., Monga, S., and Kumari, B. (2012). Effect of processing on reduction of λ-cyhalothrin residues in tomato fruits. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 88, 352–357.
Dikshit, A. K., Srivastava, Y. N. and Lal, O. P. (2000). Persistence of pyrethroids and nicotinyl insecticides on okra fruits. Pesticide Research Journal, 12, 227–231.
Habtemariam, S. (2019). The chemical and pharmacological basis of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) as potential therapy for type 2 diabetes (Ed. Habtemariam, S.) Medicinal foods as potential therapies for type-2 diabetes and associated diseases, Academic Press, p. 307–332.
Kabadad, U. and Gali, S. K. (2018). Persistence and dissipation of chlorantraniliprole residues in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and soil, International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(4), 3257-3260.
Kelageri, S. S., Rao, C., Bhushan, V. S. and Reddy, P. N. (2017). Residues, risk assessment and decontamination of lambda-cyhalothrin residues from tomato fruits. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5(5), 1764-1768.
Mariappan, P. and Kaithamalai, B. (2020). Dissipation kinetics, decontamination and risk assessment of chlorantraniliprole in okra and soil under open field condition using GC-MS. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 102(16), 3694-3706.
Mathirajan, V. G., Natarajan, K., Kuttalam, S., Chandrasekaran, S. and Regupathy, A. (2000). Efficacy of lambda cyhalothrin (Karate 5 EC) against brinjal shoot borer and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen). Pesticide Research Journal, 12, 117–119.
Mishra, P. K., Kumar, A., Kumar, P., Kumar, M., Mishra, R. (2022). Major insect pests and diseases of okra and their management (Eds. Singh, A., Patel, V.K., Singh, S.K. Ghosh, S.) Modern perspectives in agricultural and allied science. 1st ed. Integrated Publication.
Rao, C. S., Vemuri, S. B., Reddy, A. H., Darsi, R., Aruna, M. and Ramesh, B. (2014). Risk mitigation methods for removal of pesticide residues in brinjal for food safety. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(8), 279-283.
Riyaz, M., Ahmad Shah, R. and Sivasankaran, K. (2022). Pesticide Residues: Impacts on Fauna and the Environment (Eds. Ferreira Mendes, K., Nogueira de Sousa, R., Cabral Mielke, K.) Biodegradation Technology of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants.
SANCO (2011). Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed, guidelines for residues monitoring in the European Union, Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 299-308.