Eco-friendly Management of Citrus Nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans Cobb.) Infecting Lemon (Citrus limon L.)

Author:

Mukesh Jaiman1*, B.L. Baheti2, M.K. Sharma2, N.L. Meena3 and S.S. Lakhawat4

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(6): 116-121, 2024

Address:

1M.Sc. Scholar, Department of Nematology, RCA, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India.

2Professor, Department of Nematology, RCA, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India.

3Associate Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, RCA, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India.

4Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture, RCA, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India.

(Corresponding author: Mukesh Jaiman*)

DOI: -

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans (Cobb, 1913), is the most concerned nematode pest of lemons, inflicting significant losses in India due to adequate soil and environmental conditions. T. semipenetrans causes a slow decline disease in citrus. Considering the economic importance, an eco-friendly management investigation has been conducted on Tylenchulus semipenetrans, which infects lemon. Vermicompost fortified with bio-agents viz., Glomus fasciculatum, Purpureocillium lilacinum and Metarhizium anisopliae at 5 kg bio-agents in100 kg vermicompost were used at two different doses i.e.5 g/kg soil and 10 g/kg soil alongwith an untreated check. All the treatments were replicated three times in completely randomized design. Initial nematode population was kept 500 juveniles/ 200 cc soil. Results exhibited that all the treatments found significantly superior over untreated control in promoting the plant vigour as well as decreasing the citrus nematode population. Maximum reduction in nematode parameters that is number of females/ 5 g roots (53.00), number of egg mass/5 g roots (33.33), number of eggs & larvae/egg mass (30.00) and final population/200 cc soil (316.67) with per cent decrease observed to be 66.67%, 74.68%, 41.17% and 69.50%, respectively with the application of P. lilacinum enriched vermicompostat 10.00 g/kg soil followed by G. fasciculatum at the rate10.00 g/kg soil and M. anisopliae at 10.00 g/kg soil. Experimental results advocated that these eco-friendly management options may be employed in place of pesticides against citrus nematode, T. semipenetrans on lemon to promote organic and economical cultivation of lemon.

Keywords

Citrus nematode, Eco-friendly management, Bio-agent, Lemon.


Introduction

Lemon (Citrus limon L.) is an important fruit crop with evergreen leaves and yellow edible fruits belongs to family Rutaceae. Citrus is the third largest fruit crop and is extensively grown commercially in Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, West Bengal, Sikkim, Punjab and Assam in arid & semi-arid regions to humid tropical regions of India. The present area under citrus is 1.09 m ha with a production of 14.50 million tonnes (Agristat, 2020) and average productivity of 11.80 tons/ha in India. The most important commercial citrus species in India are the mandarin orange (C. reticulata), sweet orange (C. sinensis L.) and acid lime (C. aurantifolia)/lemon (C. limon) production sharing 28.36, 44.29 and 27.34 percent, respectively. In Rajasthan, Lemon occupies an area of 2.69 thousand ha with 14.47 thousand MT production and productivity of 5.66 tonnes/ha (Horticulture Statistics at a Glance 2018). Nutritional facts of citrus per 100 grams is Calories  60, Fat N/A, Sodium N/A, Fiber 3 g, Sugar 12 g, Protein 1g, Vitamin A 14 mcg, Vitamin C 70 mcg. In C. limon seed oil, the main ingredients are fatty acids such as arachidonic acid, behenic acid and linoleic acid and also tocopherols and carotenoids (Malacrida et al., 2012; Mucci et al., 2013). The C. limon stands out as having well-known nutritional properties, its valuable biological activities are underestimated in phytotherapy and cosmetology (Goetz, 2014). 

A frightening situation in citrus cultivation has developed due to dwindling of the area under citrus as it is of late threatened with the serious disease commonly known as "Citrus decline". It is well known that citrus decline is a complex disease caused by the additive effect of fungus, bacteria, virus, nematode, insect pests and soil disorders etc. In India, seventy species within 37 genera of plant parasitic nematodes have been reported in association with citrus (Reddy and Singh 1979; Khanzada et al., 2008; Kumar & Arthurs 2021). Citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans Cobb, 1913 is one of the most destructive nematode associated with citrus and is known to occur in all the citrus growing areas of the world (Thorne, 1962; Duncan et al., 1989; Sorribas et al., 2000). The citrus nematode was first discovered in California by Cobb (1913) and placed it in a new genus and named this species Tylenchulus semipenetrans on the basis of position in the root system. From India, the first report on the presence of T. semipenetrans was made by Siddiqi (1961). It is now known to be extensively distributed in the country including Punjab, Delhi, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Assam, Orissa and Kerala (Swarup et al., 1964; Mani, 1994; Singh 1999). In almost all cases this species is found to be predominant wherever die-back symptoms are present. It was suggested that citrus nematode is one of the main factors responsible for slow decline of citrus and responsible to causes direct and indirect economic losses in India. Tylenchulus semipenetrans is known to infect all type of citrus plants (mandarin orange, sweet orange and acid lime/lemon) and responsible for a substantial amount of damage in citrus orchards. The citrus nematode is responsible for causing a substantial yield reduction of 27% (Kumar et al., 2020). Although some of measures are in practice to manage the plant parasitic nematodes infecting citrus  but still not much work has been carried out on citrus nematode (T. semipenetrans) on lemon. Although the application of nematicides effectively controlled T. semipenetrans, it gave protection only for a few months and the nematode population also reached its original level within six months after application, possibly due to the imbalance of fauna and flora caused by the chemicals in soil ecosystems. Besides, nematicides are not only expensive but also pose serious problems of health hazards and environmental pollution. Bio-agents found to be effective for nematode control and they also don't have harmful residue like chemicals. Jatala (1985) reported use of biological control agents in reducing numbers of nematode with particular reference to the use of Paecilomyces lilacinus in controlling M. incognita on potatoes. It was found that the fungus significantly reduced the nematode population. Similarly Baheti et al. (2015); Bhati et al. (2021) reported the efficacy of Paecilomyces lilacinus, Pochonia chlamydosporia, Pseudomonas fluorescence, Trichoderma harzianum on different agri-horticultural crops. Maximum density of citrus nematode was observed at a depth of 1 ft. Nematode population decreases in horizontal and vertical distribution due to the lesser feeder roots in roots system. So bio-control management practice not required all over the orchard. Bio-agents uses in very small amount and after appropriate environment they increase their own population. Nematode population increases during high humidity and warm temperature. The population of nematode would be decline significantly in winters as the temperatures and R.H. decreases. So, management practices should be apply in months of July/August in Indian climatic conditions to prevent the nematode population when they are present in higher number (Jaiman and Baheti 2023). Hence an attempt was made to find out eco-friendly management of citrus nematode infecting lemon through vermicompost enriched with bio-agents. 


Material & Methods

Lemon fruit stands out as having well-known nutritional properties, its valuable biological activities are underestimated in modern phytotherapy and cosmetology. It is extensively used in the food, pharma and cosmetics industries etc (Abad-García et al., 2012; Russo et al., 2015). Lemon juice has traditionally been used as a remedy for scurvy disease of human system. Other uses for lemon juice, known from traditional medicine include treatment of high blood pressure, common cold and irregular menstruation. Besides being rich in vitamin C, it also assists in warding off infections. Citrus crops have been affected by several pest and pathogens including phyto-nematodes in India and abroad.

Among plant parasitic nematodes, citrus nematode, T. semipenetrans (Cobb, 1913) is considered to be the most important nematode pest of lemon and causes severe losses in India due to favorable soil and environmental conditions. T. semipenetrans causes slow decline disease in citrus. Looking to the economic importance of citrus nematode, an eco-friendly management trial was conducted on Tylenchulus semipenetrans infecting lemon. Vermicompost fortified with bio-agents viz., Glomus fasciculatum, Purpureocillium lilacinum and Metarhizium anisopliae (5 kg bio-agents in 100 kg vermicompost) were used at two different doses i.e.5 g/kg soil and 10 g/kg soil along with an untreated check. All the treatments were replicated three times in completely randomized design.

Earthen pots were washed, cleaned and disinfected before use by rinsing them through four per cent formalin solution. Then pots were filled with 10 kg infested soil having an initial inoculum of 500 larvae/200 cc soil with test nematode. After completion of experiment, observations viz. number of females/5 g roots, number of egg masses/5 g roots number of eggs & larvae/egg masses and final nematode population/200 cc soil were recorded. Data were analysed for evaluation of different treatments as described by Panse and Sukhatmse (1989) in order to test the significant of experimental result. The critical difference was found out for comparison of treatments where ‘F’ test was found significant at 5% level of significance. Experimental findings have been presented in Table 1 and illustrated through Plate 1, Fig. 1-2.

Results & Discussion

In present scenario, bio-agents and organic amendments play an important role in nematode management in agri-horticultural crops. Therefore in present investigation, vermicompost fortified with bio-agents (5kg per 100 kg of vermicompost), viz. Glomus  fasciculatum@ 5 g per kg of soil (T1), G. fasciculatum@ 10 g per kg of soil (T2), Purpureocillium lilacinum@5 g per kg of soil (T3), P. lilacinum@10 g per kg of soil (T4), Metarhizium anisopliae@ 5 g per kg of soil (T5), M. anisopliae@ 10 g per kg of soil (T6) were applied for the management of citrus nematode, T. semipenetrans. An untreated check was also maintained to compare and interpretate the experimental results (T7).

Results revealed that vermicompost fortified with bio-agents viz. G. fasciculatum, P. lilacinum and M. anisopliae used at the rate 5 and 10 g per kg of soil credibly reduced the infection of T. semipenetrans (females per 5 g roots, egg masses per 5 g roots, eggs & larvae per egg mass and nematode population per 200 cc soil). Among different treatments, minimum number of females per 5 g of roots was recorded when applied vermicompost fortified with P. lilacinum@ 10 g per kg soil (53.00) followed by G. fasciculatum @ 10 g per kg soil (67.00) and M. anisopliae @ 10 g per kg soil (78.00) as compared to untreated check (159.00). M. anisopliae (93.33) @ 5 g per kg soil was recorded to be least effective. Among different bio-agents, highest reduction in females per 5g of roots was observed with P. lilacinum @10 g per kg of soil (66.67%) followed by G. fasciculatum @ 10 g per kg of soil (57.86%) and M. anisopliae@ 10 g per kg of soil (50.94%) as compared to untreated check (T7). Minimum reduction (41.30%) was noticed in Metarhizium anisopliae @ 5 g per kg of soil over check.

Results revealed that minimum number of egg masses per 5 g roots were recorded with P. lilacinum @10 g per kg of soil(33.33) followed by G. fasciculatum @ 10 g per kg of soil (46.33) and M. anisopliae@ 10 g per kg of soil (57.67). Metarhizium anisopliae @ 5 g per kg of soil (73.33) was recorded least effective as compared to untreated check (131.67). Among vermicompost fortified with different bio-agents, highest reduction in egg masses per 5g roots was observed with P. lilacinum @10 g per kg of soil (74.68%) followed by G. fasciculatum @ 10 g per kg of soil(64.81%) and M. anisopliae@ 10 g per kg of soil (56.20%). Metarhizium anisopliae @ 5 g per kg of soil (44.30%) was found to be least effective over check.

Correspondingly, minimum number of eggs & larvae per egg mass was recorded with P. lilacinum at 10 g per kg of soil (30.00) followed by G. fasciculatum @ 10 g per kg of soil (36.00) and M. anisopliae@ 10 g per kg of soil (38.00). M. anisopliae (44.67) @ 5 g per kg soil was recorded to be least effective as compared to untreated check (51.00). Among different treatments, highest reduction in number of eggs and larvae per egg mass was observed with P. lilacinum @10 g per kg of soil (41.17%) followed by G. fasciculatum @ 10 g per kg of soil (29.41%) and M. anisopliae@ 10 g per kg of soil (25.49%) over untreated check. It was determined minimum (12.41%) in Metarhizium anisopliae @ 5 g per kg of soil.

Likewise, minimum nematode population per 200 cc soil was recorded with P. lilacinum @10 g per kg of soil (316.67) followed by G. fasciculatum @ 10 g per kg of soil (425.00) and M. anisopliae@ 10 g per kg of soil (525.00) over untreated check (1038.33). Metarhizium anisopliae @ 5 g per kg of soil (676.67) was recorded to be least effective. Among different bio-agents, highest reduction in number of nematodes per 200 cc soil was observed with P. lilacinum @10 g per kg of soil (69.50%) followed by G. fasciculatum @ 10 g per kg of soil (59.07%) and M. anisopliae@ 10 g per kg of soil (49.43%). Bio-agent, Metarhizium anisopliae @ 5 g per kg soil (34.83%) was observed to be least effective over untreated check. Experimental results revealed that all the tested bio-agents and organic amendment significantly reduced the soil and root population of T. semipenetrans as compared to untreated control. The nematode population declined up to 6 months and thereafter started increasing up to the harvest. This indicated that the bio-agents applications have to be further applied at 6 months interval for optimum results in nematode management.

Several workers have reported the efficacy of bio-agent for the management of plant parasitic nematode on different crops. O'bannon et al. (1979) revealed that the seedlings of Citrus limon infected with T. semipenetrans were transplanted into soil infested with Glomus mosseae, the mycorrhizal fungus infection increased seedling growth compared to non-mycorrhizal seedlings in greenhouse. Mankau (1980) carried out an experiment to evaluate the fungal antagonist of nematodes consist of nematode trapping fungi and endo-parasitic fungi. They observed that fungi can be effectively be used as bio-control agents for nematodes and may be an alternative to chemicals. Basati and Kaul (2015) observed Paecilomyces lilacinus as an effective bio-agent for the management of T. semipenetrans. The talc-formulation proved to be significantly most effective for the management of T. semipenetrans with 56.52% and 41.01% decrease in nematode population in vitro and in vivo. Hammam et al. (2016) accomplished an experiment on citrus plants with the T. semipenetrans to evaluate effect of various treatments on its management formulation, (Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, P. lilacinus, Bacillus subtilis, Serratia sp., Pseudomonas sp., Azotobacter sp., B. circulans and B. thuringiensis), Nema Plus Zero and Carbofuran. All the bio-agents suppressed T. semipenetrans populations and increased fruit yield. Ibrahim et al. (2019) exhibited an experiment to manage Tylenchulus semipenetrans by using different bio-agents and found Bio-Nematon (P. lilacinus) achieved the highest percentage of mortality for T. semipenetrans (50.0%). Bhagawati et al. (2021) conducted an experiment in an established lemon orchard to know the effect of bio agents and organic amendments on T. semipenetrans. Nagachandrabose et al. (2022) carried out an experiment on the efficacy of the bio-inoculants and found P. lilacinum with 54.9–74.4% and 53.4–74.3% reductions in population in soil and root, respectively, performed best. The egg mass parasitization by P. lilacinum was also 7.1–7.5 times higher than by T. viride. The suppression of T. semipenetrans by P. lilacinum led to an increase in the number of fruits (19.0–23.3%), fruit weight (20.2–22.3%), and fruit yield (35.4–40.3%) in acid lime trees. The cost–benefit ratio by P. lilacinum was also higher (1: 2.6–1: 3.0), whereas it was lower in carbofuran treatment (1: 2.3—1: 2.4). 

These findings clearly indicated that the use of organic amendment fortified with bio-agents in nematode-prone regions suppressed nematode populations and enhanced plant growth of various crops. This seems to be feasible because organic amendments enhance the physical properties of soil, boost the number of naturally existing enemies of the plant parasitic nematode and enhance the activity of beneficial microbes in soil. The nematode activity may be negatively impacted by nematotoxin generated by P. lilacinum, such as paecilotoxin as well as it produce appressoria on the egg shell and many enzymes (proteases & chitinase). Glomus fasciculatum is currently receiving more attention because of their potential to elevate host nutrition, particularly phosphate up take. Endo-mycorrhizal fungi may be valuable as “bio-fertilizers” in addition to their ability to combat nematodes. These findings demonstrated that soil application of bio-agents with organic amendments increased plant growth in nematode infested plants, which could be due to nematode population reduction via micro-parasitism, competition for food and space for nematode survival, or the release of some toxic metabolites which degrade the egg shell of nematode & ultimately reduced the nematode population.

The activity of soil microbes and the soil micro fauna which is mediated by mechanism including parasitism, predation, competition and antibiosis is believed to constitute biological control of nematodes an important part of integrated nematode management system.

Plate 1: Effect of bio-agents enriched vermicompost for the management of citrus nematode, T. semipenetrans on Lemon (C. limon L.).

Table 1: Eco-friendly management of Citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans infecting lemon (Citrus limon L.).

Tr. No.

Detail of Treatments

No. of females/5g roots

No. of egg masses/5g roots

No. of eggs & larvae / egg mass

Final  nematode population /200 cc soil

Per cent decrease in nematode population as compare to untreated check

Females/5g roots

Egg masses/5g roots

Eggs & larvae / egg mass

Final nematode population /200 cc soil

T1

Vermicompost fortified with               Glomus fasciculatum                 5g/kg soil

90.67

70.67

44.00

648.33

42.98

46.33

13.72

37.56

T2

Vermicompost  fortified with            Glomus fasciculatum              10g/ kg soil

67.00

46.33

36.00

425.00

57.86

64.81

29.41

59.07

T3

Vermicompost  fortified with Purpureocillium lilacinum   5g/kg soil

87.67

68.33

43.33

631.67

44.86

48.10

15.04

39.16

T4

Vermicompost  fortified with Purpureocillium lilacinum      10g/kg soil

53.00

33.33

30.00

316.67

66.67

74.68

41.17

69.50

T5

Vermicompost  fortified with Metarhizium anisopliae             5g/kg soil

93.33

73.33

44.67

676.67

41.30

44.30

12.41

34.83

T6

Vermicompost  fortified with Metarhizium anisopliae           10g/kg soil

78.00

57.67

38.00

525.00

50.94

56.20

25.49

49.43

T7

Untreated check

159.00

131.67

51.00

1038.33

-

-

-

-

SEm±

1.047

0.882

0.520

26.985

-

-

-

-

CD at 5%

3.088

2.602

1.534

82.643

-

-

-

-

Fig. 1. Eco-friendly management of Citrus nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans) infecting lemon.

Fig. 2. Final soil population of citrus nematode, T. semipenetrans in eco-friendly management trial on lemon (C.limon L.).

Conclusion

Results of present investigation exhibited that all the treatments found significantly superior over untreated control in promoting the plant vigour as well as to decrease the infection of citrus nematode on Lemon. Maximum reduction in nematode parameters recorded with the application of P. lilacinum enriched vermicompost@10.00 g/kg soil followed by G. fasciculatum @10.00 g/kg soil and M. anisopliae @10.00 g/kg soil. Experimental results clearly showed that these eco-friendly management options may be employed against citrus nematode, T. semipenetrans on lemon to enhance plant growth as well as to promote eco-friendly and economical cultivation of lemon.

References

Abad-García, B., Garmón-Lobato, S., Berrueta, L. A., Gallo, B., and Vicente, F. (2012). On line characterization of 58 phenolic compounds in Citrus fruit juices from Spanish cultivars by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array detection coupled to electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Talanta99, 213-224.

Agristat (2020). Capsicum annual production statistics and percentages. ICAR, Agristatistics.

Baheti, B. L., Dodwadiya, M., Rathore, B. S., and Bhati, S. S. (2015). Bioagents: an effective and ecofriendly option for the management of maize cyst nematode, Heteroderazeae on sweet corn (Zea mays L. saccharata). Journal of Biopesticides8(2), 141.

Basati, J. K., and Kaul, V. K. (2015). Efficacy of Paecilomyces lilacinus for the management of citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetransPlant disease research30(2), 156-158.

Bhagawati, B., Choudhary, B. N., and Kurulkar, U. (2021). Bio Management of Citrus Nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans infecting Citrus in Assam. Indian Journal of Nematology51(2), 123-128.

Bhati, S. S., Baheti, B. L., and Chandrawat, B. S. (2021). Influence of eco-friendly management modules for suppression of Meloidogyne incognita infecting cucumber in polyhouse. Indian Journal of Nematology51(1), 27-33.

Cobb, N. A. (1913). Notes on Mononchus and TylenchulusJournal of the Washington Academy of Sciences3(10), 287-288.

Duncan, L. W., Ferguson, J. J., Dunn, R. A., and Noling, J. W. (1989). Application of Taylor's power law to sample statistics of Tylenchulus semipenetrans in Florida citrus. Journal of nematology21(4S), 707.

Goetz, P. (2014). Citrus limon (L.) Burm.f. (Rutacées) citronnier. Phytothérapie12, 116-121.

Hammam, M. M. A., Wafaa, M. E. N., and Abd-Elgawad, M. M. M. (2016). Biological and chemical control of the citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans (Cobb, 1913) on mandarin in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control26(2), 345.

Horticulture Statistics at a Glance (2018). India: Horticulture statistics Division.

Ibrahim, D., Ali, A., and Metwaly, H. (2019). Bio-management of citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans and dry root rot fungi, Fusarium solani under laboratory and field conditions. Egyptian Journal of Agronematology18(2), 118-128.

Jaiman, M. and Baheti, B. L. (2023). Population dynamics of citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans on lemon (Citrus limon L.). Frontiers in Crop Improvement, 11, 324-328. (Special Issue-I).

Jatala, P. (1985). Biological control of nematodes. An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne. Volume 1: Biology and Control, 1, 303-308.

Khanzada, S. A., Iqbal, A., Munir, A., Burney, K., Hameed, S. and Rehman, H. U. (2008). Incidence and distribution of citrus nematode Tylenchulus semipenetrans in citrus orchards of Punjab. Pakistan Journal of Nematology, 26, 51-58.

Kumar, K. K., and Arthurs, S. (2021). Recent advances in the biological control of citrus nematodes: A review. Biological Control157, 104593.

Kumar, V., Khan, M. R., and Walia, R. K. (2020). Crop loss estimations due to plant-parasitic nematodes in major crops in India. National Academy Science Letters43(5), 409-412.

Malacrida, C. R., Kimura, M., and Jorge, N. (2012). Phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of citrus seed oils. Food Science and Technology Research18(3), 399-404.

Mani, A. (1994). Occurrence and distribution of Tylenchulus semipenetrans in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Nematology24(2), 106-111.

Mankau, R. (1980). Biological control of nematode pests by natural enemies. Annual Review of Phytopathology18(1), 415-440.

Mucci, A., Parenti, F., Righi, V., and Schenetti, L. (2013). Citron and lemon under the lens of HR-MAS NMR spectroscopy. Food chemistry141(3), 3167-3176.

Nagachandrabose, S., Jayaraman, J., and Somasundaram, P. (2022). Application of liquid bio-inoculants through a drip irrigation system to manage slow decline disease caused by Tylenchulus semipenetrans in acid lime trees. Phytoparasitica50, 243-253.

O'bannon, J. H., Inserra, R. N., Nemec, S., and Vovlas, N. (1979). The influence of Glomus mosseae on Tylenchulus semipenetrans-infected and uninfected Citrus limon seedlings. Journal of Nematology11(3), 247.

Panse, V. G., and Sukhatme, P. V. (1954). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Statistical methods for agricultural workers., (Ed. 3).

Reddy, P. P., and Singh, D. B. (1979). Nematode problems of citrus in India. PANS25(4), 409-419.

Russo, M., Bonaccorsi, I., Costa, R., Trozzi, A., Dugo, P., and Mondello, L. (2015). Reduced time HPLC analyses for fast quality control of citrus essential oils. Journal of essential oil research27(4), 307-315.

Siddiqi, M. R. (1961). Occurrence of the citrus nematode, Tylenchulus semipenetrans Cobb, 1913 and the reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis in India. In Proc (Vol. 48).

Singh, B. (1999). Occurrence and distribution of Tylenchulus semipenetrans Cobb in Nagpur mandarin orchards of Vidarbha, Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Nematology29(2), 149-153.

Sorribas, F. J., Verdejo-Lucas, S., Forner, J. B., Alcaidel, A., Pons, J., and Ornat, C. (2000). Seasonality of Tylenchulus semipenetrans Cobb and Pasteuria sp. in citrus orchards in Spain. Journal of Nematology32(4S), 622.

Swarup, G., Sethi, C. L., and Gill, S. (1964). Some records of plant parasitic nematodes in India, 3.

Thorne, G. (1962). Principles of nematology. Soil Science93(1), 70.

How to cite this article

Mukesh Jaiman, B. L. Baheti, M.K. Sharma, N.L. Meena and S.S. Lakhawat  (2024). Eco-friendly Management of Citrus Nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans Cobb.) Infecting Lemon (Citrus limon L.). Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(6): 116-121.