Effect of Electrolyte Leakage and Proline Content on Growth and Yield of Small-Fruited Bitter Gourd, Momordica charantia L. var. muricata under Sodic Soil Condition

Author:

R. Neelavathi1*, C. Indu Rani2 and Shibi Sebastian3

Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(9): 112-117, 2025

Address:

1Regional Research Station, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District - 606 001 (Tamil Nadu), India.

2Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003 (Tamil Nadu), India.

3ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tindivanam, Villupuram District - 641 002 (Tamil Nadu), India.

(Corresponding author: R. Neelavathi*)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.9.18

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Fifty genotypes of small-fruited bitter gourd were evaluated for yield under sodic soil. The seeds were sown in sodic soil with pH of 9.1 and EC of 0.12 dS/m. The lowest electrolyte leakage was recorded in MCM 10 (29.85%) followed by MCM 5 (31.43%) and MCM 2 (32.18%). The higher accumulation of proline was recorded in MCM 41 (0.610 mg/g) followed by MCM 14 (0.547 mg/g), MCM 1 (0.545 mg/g) and MCM 16 (0.543 mg/g). The germination percentage ranged from 51.33 to 100. The number of days for germination was significantly lower (5.79) in MCM 3, followed by MCM 50 (5.95). The number of days taken for first female flower opening ranged from 41.52 to 59.27. The number of days for first female flower opening was significantly lower (41.52) in MCM 25, followed by MCM 7(22.78) and MCM 24 (44.94). The significantly longer fruits (5.97 cm) were recorded in MCM 45, followed by MCM 41 (5.23). The individual fruit weight was significantly higher (9.94 g) in MCM 45, followed by MCM 39 (8.88) and MCM 41 (8.82). The number of fruits per plant ranged from 29.43 to 48.38. The number of fruits/plant was significantly higher in MCM 12 (48.38) followed by MCM 1 (48.33). The higher yield per plant was recorded significantly higher in MCM 45 (399.4 g) followed by MCM 41 (324.3g) and MCM 1(309.3 g). The high yielding small-fruited bitter gourd genotypes with sodicity tolerance can be successfully used in breeding programmes for developing new varieties and hybrids.

Keywords

Small-fruited bitter gourd, yield, sodic soil, proline, electrolyte leakage.

Introduction

The bitter gourd is an important vegetable of cucurbitaceae family. The small-fruited bitter gourd Momordica charantia var. muricata with small, tuberculate fruits is considered as progenitor of commercially grown large-fruited bitter gourd (Walters and Decker-Walters, 1988). It is an herbaceous vine with wide variations in leaves, flowers and fruits (Neelavathi et al., 2015). The immature fruits contain charantin, momordicin, polypeptide P, vicine, insulin-like peptides and other steroidal glycosides. Bitter gourd fruits are known to possess antihyperglycemic (Ali et al., 1993; Virdi et al., 2003), antilipidemic (Fernandes et al., 2007), antiviral, antiulcerogenic, antitumorigenic and anti-inflammatory properties. Bitter gourd fruits can regulate uptake of glucose in diabetic rats (Ahmed et al., 2004). The yield of bitter gourd is influenced by genotypes, nutrients, irrigation water, soil pH and soil properties. 

Salt affected soil is a problem in certain pockets of Tamil Nadu. Out of 4.7 lakh hectares salt affected soils in Tamil Nadu, 3.0 lakh hectares in inland and 1.7 lakh hectares in coastal areas. Out of the 3 lakhs inland salt affected soil, 2.00 lakh was due to alkalinity and 1.00 lakh hectares due to salinity. Salinity is a constraint limiting plant growth and productivity of vegetable crops. Salinity inhibits water uptake by plants, causes ionic imbalance leading to ionic toxicity and osmotic stress which affects the growth and fruit yield of horticultural crops. Sodicity is due to the presence of sodium salts in soil. Sodicity tolerance involves a complex of physiological responses and metabolic processes. Understanding the mechanism underlying plant response to salinity and sodicity provides new insights into the improvement of salt tolerance.  Plasma membrane of the cell is a site of salt injury (Mansour and Salama 2004). Electrolyte leakage is a key physiological parameter to evaluate abiotic tolerance (Arvin and Donnelly 2008). Salt tolerant genotypes maintained lower electrolyte leakage under sodic condition compared to salt sensitive genotypes. The plasma membrane integrity is maintained in genotypes having lower electrolyte leakage. 

Plants accumulate a group of metabolites particularly amino acids when exposed to biotic and abiotic stresses. Proline is an amino acid that accumulates in plants under abiotic stresses. Proline accumulation is a common physiological response in many plants in response to a wide range of biotic and abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, low temperature, heavy metals and high acidity (Verbruggen and Hermans 2008; Hossain et al., 2014). Proline is an excellent osmolyte and compatible solute. It plays a role as a metal chelator, an anti-defence molecule and a signalling molecule. Proline imparts stress tolerance (Farkhondeh et al., 2012; Gharsallah et al., 2016) by maintaining cell turgor or osmotic balance and bringing concentration of reactive oxygen species within normal range. It protects folded protein structures against denaturation, stabilises cell membranes by interacting with phospholipids, functions as a hydroxyl radical scavenger, or serves as an energy and nitrogen source. The accumulation of free proline resulted in osmotic adjustment and salt tolerance in bitter gourd by facilitating water absorption, scavengers and reactive oxygen species molecules. There is a positive correlation between proline accumulation and stress tolerance (Dar et al., 2016; Mansour and Ali 2017). In this context, growth, yield, electrolyte leakage and proline were studied in small-fruited bitter gourd. 

Material & Methods

The present investigation was carried out at the farm of Horticultural College and Research Institute for Women, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu during 2018-20. Fifty genotypes of small-fruited bitter gourd collected from Tamil Nadu were evaluated for growth, yield, electrolyte leakage and proline content. The small-fruited bitter gourd seeds were sown in clay loam soil with three replications and Randomized Block Design (RBD). The experimental soil is sodic in nature with pH of 9.1 and EC of 0.12 dS/m and ESP of 33.62 % (Table 1). The available nitrogen, phosphorus and potash in the soil was 176 kg/ha, 24 kg/ha and 258 kg/ha, respectively. The seeds were sown in the beds at 2 x 1.5 m spacing in December 2018, June 2019 and January 2020. The vines were allowed to creep on the ground.

Table 1: Soil properties of experimental field.


Sr. No.

Soil properties

Value


pH

9.1


Electrical Conductivity (EC)

0.17 dS/m


Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP)

33.62 %


Available nitrogen

176 kg/ha


Available phosphorus

24 kg/ha


Available potash

258 kg/ha

Electrolyte leakage. Ten discs of fresh leaf (0.5 cm diameter) were cut from the fully expanded leaves and the leaves were washed three times with deionized water to remove surface-adhered electrolytes. Leaf discs were placed in test tubes containing 5 ml of deionized water. The initial electrical conductivity of the solution (EC 1) was determined using a conductivity meter. After 30 minutes, electrical conductivity of the solution (EC 2) was determined. The leaf discs were then incubated in a water bath for 10 minutes to release all electrolytes, cooled down to 25°C and their final electrical conductivity (EC 3) was measured. The electrolyte leakage (EL) was calculated as

Electrolyte leakage (%) = (EC 1 – EC2 / EC 3) × 100

Proline. Proline accumulation in leaf tissue was determined via reaction with ninhydrin. Purified proline was used to build a standard curve for proline content quantification. 0.5 gram of fresh leaf samples were homogenized in 10 ml of 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 1 minute. 2 ml of supernatant was reacted with 2 ml of ninhydrin acid and 2 ml of glacial acetic acid for 1 hour at 100°C in a heater. The chromophore was extracted using 2 ml of toluene, and its absorbance at 520 nm was determined by UV Spectrophotometer with toluene used as blank. 

Proline content =

((μg proline/mL × mL toluene)/115.5 μg/μmole) × (g sample/5) = μmoles proline gram FW−1

Statistical analysis. The data were statistically analysed (Panse and Sukhatme 1985). Level of significance is 5 per cent.


Results & Discussion

Electrolyte leakage. Electrolyte leakage has been used as an indicator of cell membrane permeability under abiotic stresses. The electrolyte leakage from plasma membranes is reported as one of the most important selection criterion for identification of salt-tolerant plants (Ashraf and Ali 2008). The electrolyte leakage was significantly influenced by bitter gourd accessions. The electrolyte leakage value varies with bitter gourd accessions. The lowest electrolyte leakage indicates decrease in membrane permeability and increased cell tolerance to salt stress. The lowest electrolyte leakage was recorded in MCM 10 (29.85%) followed by MCM 5 (31.43%) and MCM 2 (32.18%). The genotypes with higher electrolyte leakage are not desirable not only due to salt stress but also higher content of potassium (Mansour and Salama 2004). Demidchik et al. (2014) also stated that electrolyte leakage is mainly related to the efflux of K+ in plant cells.

Proline content. Accumulation of proline in plants is an indication of disturbed physiological condition, triggered by biotic or abiotic stress condition. Proline is a measure of stress in vegetable crops (Claussen, 2005). Determination of free proline levels is a useful assay to monitor physiological status and to assess salt tolerance of plants. There was a significant difference in accumulation of proline in the leaves of bitter gourd (Table 2). The higher accumulation of proline was recorded in MCM 41 (0.610 mg/g) followed by MCM 14 (0.547 mg/g), MCM 1 (0.545 mg/g) and MCM 16 (0.543 mg/g). Free proline content can increase upon exposure of plants to salinity and drought (Ábrahám et al., 2010). In some of the bitter gourd genotypes, the accumulation of higher quantity of proline was positively correlated with yield per plant. Protective role of proline against salt stress was reported by Huang et al., 2009. The proline content was positively or negatively correlated with yield that could be due to genetic character of the bitter gourd genotypes. The difference in the yield is due to the role of proline in flower transition (Saxena et al., 2008).

Table 2: Electrolyte leakage and proline content in leaves of small fruited bitter gourd.


Sr. No.

Bitter gourd genotypes

Electrolyte leakage (%)

Proline (mg/g)


MCM 1

34.29

0.545


MCM 2

32.18

0.254


MCM 3

37.18

0.271


MCM 4

37.78

0.232


MCM 5

31.43

0.255


MCM 6

32.29

0.250


MCM 7

34.38

0.245


MCM 8

41.46

0.182


MCM 9

39.82

0.466


MCM 10

29.85

0.525


MCM 11

38.30

0.267


MCM 12

43.06

0.492


MCM 13

34.85

0.531


MCM 14

41.24

0.547


MCM 15

37.50

0.509


MCM 16

43.90

0.543


MCM 17

36.59

0.512


MCM 18

41.32

0.495


MCM 19

43.09

0.519


MCM 20

41.11

0.354


MCM 21

33.94

0.515


MCM 22

49.00

0.467


MCM 23

41.51

0.450


MCM 24

46.53

0.199


MCM 25

46.55

0.255


MCM 26

49.45

0.267


MCM 27

43.56

0.288


MCM 28

41.05

0.509


MCM 29

44.00

0.244


MCM 30

51.47

0.242


MCM 31

54.76

0.291


MCM 32

50.70

0.510


MCM 33

50.00

0.531


MCM 34

55.21

0.524


MCM 35

51.59

0.248


MCM 36

32.76

0.255


MCM 37

53.13

0.485


MCM 38

34.30

0.312


MCM 39

35.92

0.196


MCM 40

35.77

0.255


MCM 41

34.11

0.610


MCM 42

37.23

0.263


MCM 43

36.21

0.305


MCM 44

38.74

0.340


MCM 45

45.90

0.498


MCM 46

48.57

0.270


MCM 47

42.31

0.517


MCM 48

41.44

0.330


MCM 49

35.63

0.479


MCM 50

34.74

0.460


Mean

40.95

0.382


SEd

2.24

0.09


CD(0.05)

5.12

0.21



Growth and yield characteristics. The pooled data on growth and yield parameters of small-fruited bitter gourd grown during 2018-2020 was calculated. The presence of salts was greatly influenced the germination of bitter gourd seeds. The germination percentage was ranged from 51.33 to 100. The number of days taken for germination ranged from 5.79 to 6.58. The number of days for germination was significantly lower (5.79) in MCM 3, followed by MCM 50 (5.95).  

The yield parameters of small fruited bitter gourd under saline soil is presented in Table 3. The number of days taken for first male flower opening ranged from 34.28 to 49.85. The number of days for first male flower opening was significantly lower (34.28) in MCM 25. The number of days taken for first female flower opening ranged from 41.52 to 59.27. The number of days for first female flower opening was significantly lower (41.52) in MCM 25, followed by MCM 7 (22.78) and MCM 24 (44.94). The fruit length ranged from 2.35 cm to 5.97 cm. The significantly higher value (5.97 cm) for fruit length was recorded in MCM 45, followed by MCM 41 (5.23). The individual fruit weight was significantly higher (9.94 g) in MCM 45, followed by MCM 39 (8.88) and MCM 41 (8.82). The number of fruits per plant ranged from 29.43 to 48.38. The significantly higher number (48.38) of fruits/plant was recorded in MCM 12, followed by MCM 1 (48.33). The higher yield per plant was recorded significantly higher in MCM 45 (399.4 g) followed by MCM 41 (324.3g) and MCM 1(309.3 g). Number of seeds/fruit ranged from 3.66 to 12.33. A significantly higher number (12.33) of seeds/fruit was recorded in MCM 47, followed by MCM 39 (9.23). The level of salt tolerance varied with cultivars which are corrected with growth (Arvin and Donnelly 2008). The growth of New Zealand spinach varied with different soil texture and salinity (Kim et al., 2011) and water spinach (Yousif et al., 2010).

Table 3: Yield characteristics of small-fruited bitter gourd.

Bitter gourd genotypes

Days taken for first male flower opening

Days taken for first female flower opening

Individual fruit weight (g)

No. of fruits/

plant

Yield (g)/plant

MCM 1

41.43

49.33

6.40

48.33

309.3

MCM 2

48.22

59.18

3.71

33.89

125.7

MCM 3

42.57

46.17

4.81

39.24

188.7

MCM 4

43.26

56.15

5.16

35.21

181.7

MCM 5

41.49

49.33

7.69

36.90

283.8

MCM 6

41.32

49.15

3.92

30.10

118.0

MCM 7

37.81

44.78

2.83

39.66

112.2

MCM 8

47.89

58.13

4.03

31.56

127.2

MCM 9

39.14

46.34

3.17

32.44

102.8

MCM 10

41.27

49.22

3.56

46.25

164.7

MCM 11

41.87

50.55

5.10

39.27

200.3

MCM 12

42.36

49.66

4.93

48.38

238.5

MCM 13

35.71

45.19

2.99

47.11

140.9

MCM 14

38.25

48.66

5.43

45.11

244.9

MCM 15

42.68

51.57

2.91

42.34

123.2

MCM 16

45.17

52.63

4.92

45.76

225.1

MCM 17

44.33

52.74

3.90

44.12

172.1

MCM 18

39.27

48.21

4.21

39.25

165.2

MCM 19

45.38

52.54

3.87

43.33

167.7

MCM 20

35.47

45.72

4.88

38.46

187.7

MCM 21

44.28

51.54

2.89

43.28

125.1

MCM 22

45.31

52.58

2.87

37.24

106.9

MCM 23

38.24

46.76

2.95

39.26

115.8

MCM 24

35.65

44.94

2.76

29.43

81.2

MCM 25

34.28

41.52

5.23

35.13

183.7

MCM 26

42.66

50.65

5.92

39.89

236.1

MCM 27

39.90

48.22

3.76

39.27

147.7

MCM 28

38.33

45.25

3.14

43.53

136.7

MCM 29

38.17

48.90

3.59

34.26

123.0

MCM 30

42.58

51.33

3.90

37.92

147.9

MCM 31

41.57

49.33

5.48

39.33

215.5

MCM 32

43.46

50.59

2.79

44.62

124.5

MCM 33

47.20

55.32

2.86

46.75

133.7

MCM 34

34.56

44.97

4.01

45.54

182.6

MCM 35

39.14

47.65

3.67

38.23

140.3

MCM 36

39.21

47.23

5.96

38.35

228.6

MCM 37

43.82

50.65

4.89

35.37

173.0

MCM 38

39.26

47.18

2.45

39.25

96.2

MCM 39

39.53

48.21

8.88

31.26

277.6

MCM 40

44.48

51.85

2.75

35.63

98.0

MCM 41

42.33

49.49

8.82

36.77

324.3

MCM 42

43.67

50.26

4.75

37.16

176.5

MCM 43

44.11

51.17

2.01

38.24

76.9

MCM 44

41.65

49.26

2.69

39.48

106.2

MCM 45

42.66

49.15

9.94

40.18

399.4

MCM 46

43.73

50.28

2.76

39.88

110.1

MCM 47

42.55

49.55

2.52

42.33

106.7

MCM 48

49.85

59.27

3.18

39.13

124.4

MCM 49

45.24

55.33

3.33

40.25

134.0

MCM 50

49.21

57.66

3.92

40.28

157.9

Mean

41.83

50.03

4.26

39.48

167.4

SEd

0.23

1.06

0.77

1.94

5.11

CD(0.05)

0.46

2.13

1.55

3.88

11.53

 

Conclusion

Among 50 small-fruited bitter gourd genotypes evaluated, MCM 12 (44.38 fruits/plant) and MCM 1 (48.33 fruits/plant) recorded better yield performance. The lowest electrolyte leakage was recorded in MCM 10 (29.85 %) followed by MCM 5 (31.43 %) and MCM 2 (32.18 %). The higher accumulation of proline was recorded in MCM 41 (0.610 mg/g) followed by MCM 14 (0.547 mg/g), MCM 1 (0.545 mg/g) and MCM 16 (0.543 mg/g). The presence of wide variation in yield, electrolyte leakage and proline content in small-fruited bitter gourd offered a great scope for selecting the suitable genotypes in the breeding programmes for development of varieties/hybrids for sodic soil.


Future Scope

Study on proline and electrolyte in response to salt stress will provide the better understanding of developing technologies and varieties for salt affected soils. Proline induces the expression of salt‐stress‐responsive proteins and may improve the adaptation of plants to salt‐stress. Addressing the problems of salinity is necessary to sustain the vegetable production in future. The improvement in understanding of the responses of vegetable crops to salinity is one of the necessary prerequisites for increased cultivation and their use for phytoremediation could contribute to solving the problem of salinization.

References

Ábrahám, E., Hourton-Cabassa, C., Erdei, L. and Szabados, L. (2010). Methods for determination of proline in plants. Plant stress tolerance: methods and protocols, 317-331. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press

Ahmed, I., Adeghate, E., Commings, E., Sharma, A. K. and Singh, J. (2004). Beneficial effects and mechanism of action of Momordica charantia juice in the treatment of streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in rat. Molecular and Cell Biochemistry, 261, 63-70. 

Ali, L.,   Khan, A. K.,  Mamun, M. I.,  Mosihuzzaman, M., Nahar, N.,  Nur-e-Alam, M. and Rokeya, B. (1993). Studies on hypoglycemic effects of fruit pulp, seed and whole plant of Momordica charantia on normal and diabetic model rats. Planta Medica, 59(5), 408-412. 

Arvin, M. J. and Donnelly, D. J. (2008). Screening potato cultivars and wild species to abiotic stresses using an electrolyte leakage bioassay. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology10(1), 33-42.

Ashraf, M. and Ali, Q. (2008). Relative membrane permeability and activities of some antioxidant enzymes as the key determinants of salt tolerance in canola (Brassica napus L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63(1-3), 266-273. 

Claussen, W. (2005). Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant science, 168(1), 241-248. 

Dar, M. I., Naikoo, M. I., Rehman, F., Naushin, F. and Khan, F. A. (2016). Proline accumulation in plants: roles in stress tolerance and plant development. Osmolytes and plants acclimation to changing environment: emerging omics technologies, 155-166. 

Demidchik, V., Straltsova, D., Medvedev, S. S., Pozhvanov, G. A., Sokolik, A. and Yurin, V. (2014). Stress-induced electrolyte leakage: The role of K+-permeable channels and involvement in programmed cell death and metabolic adjustment. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(5), 1259-1270. 

Farkhondeh, R., Nabizadeh, E. and Jalilnezhad, N. (2012). Effect of salinity stress on proline content, membrane stability and water relations in two sugar beet cultivars. International Journal of AgriScience, 2(5). 385-392.

Fernandes, N. P. C., Lagishetty, C. V., Panda, V. S. and Naik, S.R. (2007). An experimental evaluation of the antidiabetic and antilipidemic properties of a standardized Momordica charantia fruit extract. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 7, 1-8. 

Gharsallah, C., Fakhfakh, H., Grubb, D. and Gorsane, F. (2016). Effect of salt stress on ion concentration, proline content, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression in tomato cultivars. AoB Plants, 8, plw055. 

Huang, Y., Bie, Z., Liu, Z., Zhen, A. and Wang, W. (2009). Protective role of proline against salt stress is partially related to the improvement of water status and peroxidase enzyme activity in cucumber. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition55(5), 698-704. 

Hossain, M. A., Hoque, M. A., Burritt, D. J. and Fujita, M. (2014). Proline protects plants against abiotic oxidative stress: biochemical and molecular mechanisms. In Oxidative damage to plants. Academic press. p 477-522. 

Kim, S. K., Kim, I. K. and Lee, G. J. (2011). Growth responses of New Zealand spinach [Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pall.) Kuntze] to different soil texture and salinity. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science, 38, 631-639.

Mansour, M. M. F. & Ali, E. F. (2017). Evaluation of proline functions in saline conditions. Phytochemistry140, 52-68.

Mansour, M. M. F. and Salama, K. H. A. (2004). Cellular basis of salinity tolerance in plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 52, 113-122. 

Neelavathi, R., Shankaraswamy, J. and Ravi, V. (2015). Exploring variability in bitter gourd Momordica charantia var. muricata) in Tamil Nadu. Current Horticulture, 3, 54-57. 

Panse, V. G. & Sukhatme, P. V. (1985). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, New Delhi, p145-156.

Saxena, S.N., Kaushik, N. and Sharma, R. (2008). Effect of abscisic acid and proline on in vitro flowering in Vigna aconitifoliaBiologia Plantarum, 52, 181-183.

Verbruggen, N. and Hermans, C. (2008). Proline accumulation in plants: A review. Amino acids, 35, 753-759. 

Virdi, J., Sivakami, S., Shahani, S., Suthar, A. C., Banavalikar, M. M. and Biyani, M. (2003). Antihyperglycemic effects of three extracts from Momordica charantia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 88(1), 107-111.   

Walters, T. W. and Decker-Walters, D. S. (1988). Balsam pear (Momordica charantia, Cucurbitaceae). Economic Botany, 42, 286-288.

Yousif, B. S., Nguyen, N. T., Fukuda, Y., Hakata, H., Okamoto, Y., Masaoka, Y. and Saneoka, H. (2010). Effect of salinity on growth, mineral composition, photosynthesis and water relations of two vegetable crops; New Zealand spinach (Tetragonia tetragonioides) and water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 12(2), 211-216.

How to cite this article

R. Neelavathi, C. Indu Rani and Shibi Sebastian (2025). Effect of Electrolyte Leakage and Proline content on Growth and Yield of Small-Fruited Bitter Gourd, Momordica charantia L. var. muricata under Sodic Soil Condition. Biological Forum, 17(9): 112-117.