Effect of Micronutrients and Biofertilizers on the Growth and Yield of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Winter Dawn

Author:

Manbeer Singh* and Maninderjit Singh

Journal Name: Biological Forum, 18(2): 71-74, 2026

Address:

*Department of Horticulture, Khalsa College, Amritsar (Punjab), India.

(Corresponding author: Manbeer Singh* singhmanbeer9991@gmail.com)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2026.18.2.11

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Micronutrients are essentially as important as macronutrients to have better growth, yield and quality in plants. As a component of proteins, zinc acts as a functional, structural, or regulatory cofactor of a large number of enzymes. The main functions of boron relate to cell wall strength and development, cell division, fruit and seed development, sugar transport and hormone development. Biofertilizers play a very significant role in improving soil fertility by fixing atmospheric nitrogen, both, in association with plant roots and without it, solubilise insoluble soil phosphates and produces plant growth substances in the soil. Keeping all these points in mind the present study was planned at Khalsa college, Amritsar in year 2023-2024. Strawberry cultivation trials integrating micronutrients and biofertilizers faced challenges such as inconsistent nutrient uptake, variability in soil microbial activity, difficulty in optimizing dosage combinations, environmental stress effects on plant response, and limited standardization of application methods under field conditions. The study was laid out in randomized block design with fifteen treatments and replicated thrice. The results were statistically analyzed at p≤ 0.05 level of significance. The results revealed that foliar application of micronutrients and biofertilizers significantly effect the growth and yield of strawberry. The treatment Azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + ZnSO₄ (0.4%) (T8) produced the best overall results.

Keywords

Strawberry, micronutrients, biofertilizers, growth and yield attributes.

Introduction

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is a major temperate fruit crop that can also be cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions with proper management. It is highly appreciated for its appealing shape, pleasant aroma, and refreshing taste (Ali and Gaur 2007). Considered one of the world's most flavourful fruits, strawberry holds a significant position in both processing industries and global fresh markets (Sharma and Sharma 2004). The cultivated strawberry originated from the hybridization of two dioecious octaploid species, Fragaria chiloensis Duch. and Fragaria virginiana Duch. It is a small herbaceous plant grown either annually or perennially, with all leaves, roots, flowers, and runners emerging from its crowns (Bowling, 2000). Although primarily a short-day crop suited to temperate climates, it can also be successfully grown in tropical and subtropical regions (Bakshi et al., 2014). Mulching plays an important role in improving yield, fruit quality, and harvest duration by enhancing nutrient availability, reducing weed growth, protecting plants from frost, and minimizing the occurrence of dirty or diseased berries (Sharma, 2002).

Micronutrients are crucial for the overall growth and development of plants, including strawberries. While macronutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are required in large amounts, micronutrients are needed in smaller quantities to support essential physiological functions. Zinc, for instance, is vital for plant development but remains poorly mobile in soils, often leading to deficiencies in crops like mango, banana, guava, litchi, apple, grape, and pomegranate (Ganeshamurthy et al., 2018). Zinc-dependent enzymes are involved in carbohydrate metabolism, membrane stability, protein synthesis, auxin regulation, and pollen formation (Hafeez et al., 2013). Boron is another key micronutrient affecting plant growth, productivity, and quality (Pereira et al., 2021). Present in soils mainly as tetrahydroxy borate and boric acid (Hrmova et al., 2020), boron is required for hormone production, fruit and seed development, sugar transport, cell wall strengthening, and cell division (Rasheed, 2009).

Biofertilizers are organic products containing living cells of different type of microorganisms, which have the capability to convert nutritionally important elements from unavailable to available form through biological processes. Biofertilizers or microbial inoculants, contain living or dormant cells of beneficial microorganisms. They provide a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers by enhancing soil fertility, improving flower quality, and increasing yields (Kumari et al., 2016). Azotobacter is one of the free living N2 fixing, non-symbiotic and heterotrophic bacteria ascribed to fix nitrogen from the atmosphere. It is also associated with the production of growth promoting substances, phytohormones and antifungal substances (Singh and Varu 2013). Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi further benefit plants by improving nutrient uptake-especially phosphorus-through their extensive hyphal networks. They enhance soil structure, moisture retention, and disease resistance, leading to improved plant vigor (Pradeep & Saravanam 2018). VAM fungi also aid in the absorption of additional nutrients such as calcium, copper, manganese, sulphur, and zinc (Abbasi et al., 2015).

Material & Methods

Runners of the cultivar ‘Winter Dawn’ were transplanted in the first week of November at a spacing of 45 × 30 cm using the double-row planting system in the Nursery of the Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar, during 2023-2024. The experiment consisted of fifteen treatments; each replicated three times. Strawberry plants were treated with either individual applications or various combinations of micronutrients and biofertilizers. Treatment details are as follows:  

Treatments

Details

T1

Control

T2

ZnSo4 (0.2%)

T3

ZnSo4 (0.4%)

T4

Borax (0.2%)

T5

Borax (0.4%)

T6

Azotobacter (6 kg/ha)

T7

Azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + ZnSo4 (0.2%)

T8

Azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + ZnSo4 (0.4%)

T9

Azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + Borax (0.2%)

T10

Azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + Borax (0.4%)

T11

VAM (6 kg/ha)

T12

VAM (6 kg/ha) + ZnSo4 (0.2%)

T13

VAM (6 kg/ha) + ZnSo4 (0.4%)

T14

VAM (6 kg/ha) + Borax (0.2%)

T15

VAM (6 kg/ha) + Borax (0.4%)

To prepare the solution of ZnSO4 (0.2% and 0.4%) and Borax (0.2% and 0.4%) concentration, 2g and 4g were dissolved in 1 litre of distilled water, respectively. Biofertilizers (Azotobacter and VAM) were applied @6 kg/ha under the soil near roots before transplanting.

A. Observations noted  

Observations on various growth and yield parameters were collected from each replication of every treatment throughout the study period. The recorded data included plant height, number of leaves per plant, leaf area (cm²), days to flowering, number of flowers per plant, fruit length (cm), fruit breadth (cm), fruit weight (g), palatability score, number of fruits per plant, and yield per plant (g). Plant height was recorded with centimeter scale. Number of leaves (per plant) was counted manually from tagged plants at end of trail. Leaf area was recorded by using graph paper method. Days to first flowering were noted from days to transplanting. Number of flowers and fruits were noted in each flush and added at end of trail to receive an average number of flowers and fruits per plant. Fruit length and breadth were measured with the help of Digital Vernier Caliper's. Fruit weight and yield per plant was recorded by using digital weighing balance. 

B. Statistical analysis

The experiment's data were analyzed using a Randomized Block Design (RBD), with results expressed as Mean ± Standard Error (S.E.). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test were used to compare different treatments for each parameter, with differences indicated by different letters. Statistical analysis was performed at a 5% significance level using SPSS software (version 30).

Results & Discussion

A. Growth Attributes

The results presented in Table 1 indicate that the application of various micronutrients and biofertilizers significantly improved all growth parameters at each stage of development compared with the control during the study. The treatment consisting of Azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + ZnSO₄ (0.4%) (T8) recorded the highest values for plant height (18.90 cm), number of leaves per plant (21.13), leaf area (24.88 cm²) and number of flowers per plant (25.30). In contrast, the control treatment (T1) showed the lowest plant height (15.74 cm), leaf number (15.06), leaf area (22.28 cm²) and number of flowers (13.28). Plants receiving the T8 treatment also flowered earliest (47.66 days), while the control plants required the most time to flower (59.41 days).

The positive effects of ZnSO₄ on growth are attributed to its role in activating enzymes, promoting auxin synthesis, enhancing root development, and increasing chlorophyll content. Azotobacter contributes to improved growth through its production of growth-promoting substances that stimulate cell elongation and division in meristematic tissues. When applied together, Azotobacter and ZnSO₄ enhance nitrogen availability, support enzymatic activity, promote hormone synthesis, and improve overall plant vigor, leading to superior growth performance in strawberries. These results align with the findings of Bahadur et al. (2022); Chandramohan and Goyal (2020); Saha et al. (2019) in strawberry.

Table 1: Effect of foliar application of micronutrients and biofertilizers on growth attributes of strawberry cv. Winter Dawn.

Treatments

Plant height

Number of leaves per plant

Leaf area (cm2)

Days taken for flowering

Number of flowers per plant

T1

15.74 ± 0.07h

15.06 ± 0.61i

22.28 ± 0.02m

59.41 ± 1.28a

13.28 ± 0.90h

T2

16.82 ± 0.06f

16.40 ± 0.34hi

22.95 ± 0.02k

55.25 ± 0.66bcd

17.58 ± 0.33fg

T3

17.05 ± 0.09ef

16.80 ± 0.60gh

23.21 ± 0.03j

49.66 ± 0.62hi

22.15 ± 0.80bc

T4

16.13 ± 0.23gh

16.20 ± 0.60hi

22.75 ± 0.03l

56.66 ± 0.87b

15.66 ± 0.78gh

T5

16.62 ± 0.10fg

16.40 ± 0.34hi

22.88 ± 0.03k

54.00 ±1.39bcde

17.55 ± 1.19fg

T6

17.98 ± 0.08bcd

19.60 ± 0.34bcd

23.96 ± 0.02f

48.83 ± 0.62hi

23.38 ± 0.74ab

T7

18.59 ± 0.30ab

20.20 ± 0.34abc

24.72 ± 0.03b

52.66 ± 1.66def

23.61 ± 1.18ab

T8

18.90 ± 0.09a

21.13 ± 0.64a

24.88 ± 0.04a

47.66 ± 0.94i

25.30 ± 0.85a

T9

18.14 ± 0.15bcd

20.06 ±0.30abcd

24.07 ± 0.03e

53.08 ± 0.52cdef

20.06 ± 0.61de

T10

18.28 ± 0.45bc

20.93 ± 0.61ab

24.48 ± 0.03c

52.25 ± 1.50efg

23.03 ± 0.56b

T11

16.51 ± 0.20fg

17.60 ± 0.34fgh

23.45 ± 0.03i

52.25 ± 0.43efg

18.78 ± 0.40ef

T12

17.57 ± 0.20de

18.03 ± 0.60efg

23.59 ± 0.03h

53.16 ± 1.18cdef

21.95 ± 1.95bcd

T13

16.69 ± 0.20fg

18.60 ± 0.60def

24.37 ± 0.03d

50.66 ± 1.04fgh

23.85 ± 0.97ab

T14

17.76 ± 0.15cd

19.06 ± 0.41cdef

23.78 ± 0.04g

55.58 ± 1.80bc

19.93 ± 0.64de

T15

17.86 ± 0.24cd

19.20 ± 0.60cde

23.87 ± 0.02fg

53.25 ± 0.66cdef

20.33 ± 0.64cde

B. Physical Parameters

It is also evident from the data given in Table 2 that the increased fruit length (3.96 cm), fruit breadth (2.96 cm), fruit weight (13.39 g), palatability rating (8.86), number of fruits per plant (14.83) and yield per plant (198.71 g/plant) were obtained when plants were treated with treatment (T8) azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + ZnSO4 (0.4%), while minimum fruit length (2.56 cm), fruit breadth (2.09 cm), fruit weight (9.98 g), palatability rating (5.80), number of fruits per plant (11.61) and yield per plant (115.93 g/plant) were recorded under treatment (T1) control. The possible reason for increment in yield might be associated to the involvement of zinc in many physiological and metabolic activities e.g., enzymatic activities, photosynthates production, fruit production maturation, plant hormones stimulation and starch formation. The biofertilizer's positive effect on fruit yield could be attributed due to advantageous effects on vegetative growth and flowering, which probably gave the inoculated plants access to more photosynthates for a longer period of time, boosting fruit yield (Gupta and Tripathi 2012). When both azotobacter and zinc are used together they enhances plant growth and nutrient availability, leading to healthier, better- development strawberries. These results are in line with the findings of Kumar and Tripathi (2020); Sabahat et al (2021); Rahman et al (2016) in strawberry.

Table 2: Effect of foliar application of micronutrients and biofertilizers on physical parameters of strawberry cv. Winter Dawn.

Treatments

Fruit length (cm)

Fruit breadth (cm)

Fruit weight (g)

Number of fruits per plant

Palatability rating

Yield (g/plant)

T1

2.56 ± 0.04l

2.09 ± 0.03k

9.98 ± 0.05n

11.61 ± 0.04m

5.80 ± 0.30i

115.93 ± 1.03l

T2

2.82 ± 0.03j

2.27 ± 0.02ij

10.15 ± 0.06m

12.34 ± 0.04k

6.36 ± 0.37ghi

125.56 ± 1.32j

T3

2.93 ± 0.02i

2.31 ± 0.01hi

10.95 ±0.056k

12.57 ± 0.05j

6.50 ± 0.30ghi

136.29 ± 2.13i

T4

2.64 ± 0.04k

2.14 ± 0.02k

10.08 ± 0.03m

11.99 ± 0.04l

6.23 ± 0.25hi

120.46 ± 1.47k

T5

2.75 ± 0.05j

2.22 ± 0.01j

10.41 ± 0.06l

12.09 ± 0.04l

6.56 ± 0.40fghi

125.89 ± 1.34j

T6

3.56 ± 0.02e

2.58 ± 0.01e

11.48 ± 0.04h

13.32 ± 0.05h

6.86±0.30defgh

152.99 ± 1.46g

T7

3.91 ± 0.02ab

2.87 ± 0.01b

13.19 ± 0.04b

14.53 ± 0.04b

8.40 ± 0.17ab

191.74 ± 1.48b

T8

3.96 ± 0.01a

2.96 ± 0.01a

13.39 ± 0.05a

14.83 ± 0.05a

8.86 ± 0.30a

198.71 ± 1.49a

T9

3.62 ± 0.02de

2.64 ± 0.01d

11.73 ± 0.02g

14.04 ± 0.02d

7.50 ±0.30bcde

164.83 ± 1.64f

T10

3.85 ± 0.03bc

2.82 ± 0.02b

13.03 ± 0.04c

14.31 ± 0.04c

8.16 ± 0.35abc

186.32 ± 1.74c

T11

3.07 ± 0.02h

2.35 ± 0.02h

11.09 ± 0.04j

12.85 ± 0.03i

6.63 ±0.15efghi

142.54 ± 0.84h

T12

3.67 ± 0.02d

2.69 ± 0.02d

12.48 ± 0.03e

13.77 ± 0.02f

7.20 ±0.40defg

172.02 ± 1.69e

T13

3.77 ± 0.02c

2.76 ± 0.01c

12.89 ± 0.04d

13.89 ± 0.05e

7.63 ± 0.15bcd

179.17 ± 1.33d

T14

3.25 ± 0.02g

2.41 ± 0.01g

11.33 ± 0.04i

13.36 ± 0.03h

7.16 ±0.35defg

151.55 ± 1.83g

T15

3.47 ± 0.01f

2.51 ± 0.02f

12.15 ± 0.04f

13.52 ± 0.04g

7.46 ±0.30cdef

164.31 ± 1.10f

Conclusion

Foliar application of various micronutrients and biofertilizers was successful in improving growth and yield of strawberry as compared to control. But from all treatments, Azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + ZnSO₄ (0.4%) (T8) was most successful in enhancing the growth and yield of strawberry. Plants treated with Azotobacter (6 kg/ha) + ZnSO₄ (0.4%) (T8) treatment flowered earliest (47.66 days), recorded the highest values for plant height, number of leaves per plant, leaf area, number of flowers per plant, fruit length, fruit breadth, fruit weight, palatability rating, number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.

Future Scope

Strawberries command a high market price, thereby enhancing farmer’s income and profitability. Strawberry cultivation using Azotobacter and zinc is very promising, especially under sustainable and organic farming systems. With rising demand for high-quality fruits and reduced chemical inputs, this combination offers strong research and commercial potential.

References

Abbasi, H., Akhtar, A. and Sharf, R. (2015). Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi: a tool for sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization Technology5(2), 40-49.

Ali, A. and Gaur, G. S. (2007). Effect of mulching on growth, fruit yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch). The Asian J Hortic., 2, 149-151.

Bahadur, V., Mishra, S. and Bopparaju, A. K. (2022). Effect of foliar application of iron and zinc on growth, yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) cv. Winter Dawn. Int J Plant & Soil Sci., 34, 587-93.

Bakshi, P., Bhat, D. J., Wali, V. K., Sharma, A. and Iqbal, M. (2014). Growth, yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Chandler as influenced by various mulching materials. African J Agri Res., 9, 701-706.

Bowling, B. L. (2000). The Berry Grower’s Companion Timber Press Inc Portland Oregon, USA.

Chandramohan Reddy, G. and Goyal, R. K. (2020). Growth, yield and quality of strawberry as affected by fertilizer N rate and biofertilizers inoculation under greenhouse conditions. J Plant Nutr., 44, 46-58.

Ganeshamurthy, A. N., Raghu-pathi, H. B., Rupa, T. R., Rajendiran, S. and Kalaivanan, D. (2018). Micro-nutrient management in horticultural crops. Indian J Ferti., 14, 68-85.

Gupta, A. K. and Tripathi, V. K. (2012). Efficacy of Azotobacter and vermicompost alone and in combination on vegetative growth, flowering and yield of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Chandler. Prog Horti, 44, 256- 261.

Hafeez, B. M. K. Y., Khanif, Y. M. and Saleem, M. (2013). Role of zinc in plant nutrition-a review. American J Exp Agri., 3, 374-391.

Hrmova, M., Gilliham, M. and Tyerman, S. D. (2020). Plant transporters involved in combating boron toxicity: beyond 3D structures. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 48, 1683-1696.

Kumar, A. and Tripathi, V. K. (2020). Effect of Azotobacter, PSB and vermicompost on growth, flowering, yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Chandler. Progr Horti., 52, 157-61.

Kumari, A., Goyal, R. K., Sehrawat, S. K., Choudhary, M. and Sindhu, S. S. (2016). Effect of some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains on growth and flowering of chrysanthemum. J Crop Weed, 12, 07-15.

Pradeep, B. and Saravanan, S. (2018). Effect of different Biofertilizers and organic manures on yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. chandler. J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 6, 151-55.

Pereira, G. L., Siqueira, J. A., Batista-Silva, W., Cardoso, F. B., Nunes-Nesi, A. and Araújo, W. L. (2021). Boron: More than an essential element for land plants? Front Plant Sci., 11, 610307.

Rahman, M. M., Sahadat, M., Rahul, S. K., Roni, M. Z. K. and Jamal Uddin, A. F. M. (2016). Effect of pre-harvest B and Zn spray on yield and quality of strawberry. Inter J Bus Soc and Sci Res., 5, 41-46. 

Rasheed, M. K. (2009). Role of boron in plant growth: A review. J Agric Res., 47, 329-338.

Sabahat, S., Abbasi, J., Ahmad, M., Mumtaz, S., Khan, T. N., Tariq, S. and Imran, M. (2021) Role of Micronutrients in improving fruit quality and yield of strawberry cv. Chandler under microclimatic conditions. Pakistan J Agri Res., 34, 897-904.

Saha, T., Ghosh, B., Debnath, S. and Bhattacharjee, A. (2019) Effect of Micronutrients on growth, yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Winter Dawn in the gangetic alluvial region of West Bengal. J Crop Weed, 15, 92-95.

Singh, J. and Varu, D. (2013) Effect of integrated nutrient management in papaya (Carica papaya L.) cv. Madhubindu. Asian J Horti, 8, 667-670.

Sharma, R. R. (2002). Growing Strawberries. International Book Publishing and Distributing Co., Lucknow, India.

Sharma, V. P. and Sharma, R. R. (2004). The strawberry: Indian Council of Agricultural research, New Delhi.

How to cite this article

Manbeer Singh and Maninderjit Singh (2026). Effect of Micronutrients and Biofertilizers on the Growth and Yield of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)  cv. Winter Dawn. Biological Forum, 18(2): 71-74.