Author: Vinod Kumar, Shashank Tyagi, M.K. Singh and Sushant
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 17(1): 136-141, 2025
Address:
Department of Agronomy, Bihar Agricultural College, Sabour, Bhagalpur (Bihar), India.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.1.23
Indian mustard is cultivated as rainfed during winter (rabi) season using profile-stored soil moisture. However, productivity of rainfed mustard is too low which may be largely due to lack of inadequate soil and water management with reference to water shortage in soil profile. Among them, tillage practices play an important role in enhancing and economizing the mustard productivity. Among different tillage practices, conventional tillage resulted into higher growth parameters and yield of mustard (Poddar and Kundu 2007). Tillage is an important agronomic practice and plays vital role in soil moisture conservation at different depths in rainfed cultivation. It also improves soil condition by altering mechanical impedance to root penetration, hydraulic conductivity and water holding capacity, which in turn affects plant growth.
Rapeseed and mustard has the highest requirement of sulphur among all the oilseed crops. Response of mustard to S is determined by moisture availability, soil S status and yield level. S is involved in oil synthesis and physiological functions like amino acid synthesis, component of vitamin A and activates enzyme system in plant (Havlin et al., 2004). Boron is required in lesser quantities by most of the field crops, but it affects the crop yield to greater extent. There are numerous reports on the positive response of mustard to B fertilization (Islam, 2005). Seed yield is greatly influenced by boron particularly, where soil is deficient in B. They reported that B increased number of siliqua and yield of mustard. Keeping these issues in view, the present investigation was undertaken to find out effect of moisture conservation practices and nutrient management on growth, yield attributes, yield and oil content of mustard.
A field experiment was conducted during rabi season 2016-17 and 2017-18 at research farm of Bihar Agricultural College, Sabour, Bhagalpur at latitude of 25°15'40″N and longitude 87°2'42″E with an altitude of 37.46 meters above mean sea level to find out effect of moisture conservation practices and nutrient management on growth, yield attributes, yield and oil content of mustard. The experimental plot was sandy loam in texture, low in available nitrogen (230.35 kg ha-1) and phosphorus (23.9 kg ha-1) and medium in available potassium (143.4 kg ha-1), medium in available sulphur (13.26 ppm) and low in available boron (0.44 ppm). The experiment consisted of twenty seven treatment combinations comprising three tillage practices viz., conventional tillage, zero tillage and reduced tillage place in main plot, whereas three doses of sulphur i.e. 0, 20 and 40 kg ha-1 in sub plots and three doses of boron i.e. 0, 1.0 and 2.0 kg ha-1 in sub sub plots. The experiment was laid out in split split plot design with three replications.
Conventional tillage system was required thorough field preparation before sowing that was accomplished by one deep ploughing with cultivator, two harrowing and planking. In reduced and zero tillage system, seeds were sown in rows with the help of hand operated narrow blade (Kudal) by opening furrow. Recommended dose of NPK viz., 40 kg N, 20 kg P2O5 and 20 kg K2O ha-1 was applied uniformly. Full dose of nitrogen and full dose of phosphorus and potassium was applied as basal dressing as basal. Sulphur was applied through bentonite sulphur and boron through boron fertilizer as per treatment as basal.
Data on growth (plant height), yield attributes (number of primary branches plant-1, number of secondary branches plant-1 and number of siliqua plant-1), seed yield and oil content were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed separately to interpret the results. The mean data for each parameter has been presented. For comparison of ‘F’ values and for determination of critical difference at 5% level of significance, Fisher (1970) was consulted. The data of two years 2016-17 and 2017-18 were pooled and analysed.
Growth parameters of mustard
Plant height. Plant height increased progressively with the advancement in the age of mustard irrespective of treatments. Tillage practices influenced the height significantly at harvest. Highest height was recorded with conventional tillage which was significantly higher than rest of the tillage practices except reduced tillage (Table 1). The increasing the intensity of tillage operations markedly influenced the plant height. All the growth parameters improved with conventional tillage at most of the growth stages during the experimentation. This supports the well-established fact that a fine seed bed is very much essential for good germination, growth and development of plant for getting better yield. Conventional tillage produced highest plant height at 90 days after sowing and at harvest over other methods of tillage practices. These results are in conformity with the findings of Saha et al. (2010); Belal (2013).
Application of 40 kg S ha-1 increased the plant height significantly caused an increase of 3.59 and 3.32 cm over control, respectively at 60 and 90 DAS though the difference between 20 and 40 kg S ha-1 was not significant. Increasing levels of B up to 1.0 kg ha-1 significantly increased the height at 60 and 90 DAS registered an increase of 3.25 and 4.14 cm over control, respectively. However, the difference between 1.0 and 2.0 kg B ha-1 was not significant.
Maximum plant height was recorded at 40 kg S ha-1. The rate of increase in plant height was more with higher dose of S application perhaps due to increased metabolic processes in plant with sulphur application which seems to have promoted meristematic activities resulting in higher apical growth and expansion of photosynthetic surface (Piri et al., 2011). Increase in plant height with an increase in dose of sulphur application has also been reported by Rana et al. (2005). These results are also in close conformity with the results of Verma et al. (2012). The rate of increase in plant height was more at 60 kg S ha-1 due to better nutritional environment for plant growth at active vegetative stages as a result of improvement in root growth, cell multiplication, elongation and cell expression in the plant body (Kumar and Yadav 2007) which ultimately increased the plant height.
The maximum plant height was recorded with 1.0 kg B ha-1 as compared to control (no boron). Verma et al. (2012) also found significant effect of boron application on plant height in mustard. This might be due to role of B in cell elongation, photosynthesis and translocation of photosynthates (Stangoulis et al., 2001).
Table 1: Effect of tillage, sulphur and boron on plant height (cm) of mustard (Pooled mean over two years)
Treatments | Plant height (cm) | |||
30 DAS | 60 DAS | 90 DAS | At harvest | |
Tillage practices | ||||
T1-Conventional tillage | 44.67 | 138.30 | 162.66 | 168.62 |
T2- Zero Tillage | 46.73 | 140.65 | 160.38 | 166.50 |
T3- Reduced Tillage | 46.53 | 140.36 | 161.44 | 168.21 |
SEm± | 0.67 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.48 |
CD (P = 0.05) | NS | 1.51 | 1.64 | 1.58 |
Sulphur levels (kg ha-1) | ||||
S1-0 | 44.40 | 137.51 | 159.54 | 165.51 |
S2-20 | 46.52 | 140.69 | 162.08 | 168.51 |
S3-40 | 47.01 | 141.10 | 162.86 | 169.32 |
SEm± | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
CD (P = 0.05) | NS | 2.44 | 2.24 | NS |
Boron levels (kg ha-1) | ||||
B1-0 | 44.24 | 137.67 | 158.83 | 165.25 |
B2-1.0 | 46.97 | 140.92 | 162.97 | 169.12 |
B3-2.0 | 46.72 | 140.71 | 162.67 | 168.96 |
SEm± | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.89 |
CD (P = 0.05) | 1.82 | 1.93 | 2.39 | 2.52 |
Interaction | ||||
T×S | NS | NS | NS | NS |
T×B | NS | NS | NS | NS |
S×B | NS | NS | NS | NS |
T×S×B | NS | NS | NS | NS |
Number of primary branches plant-1. The effect of tillage practices on primary branches plant-1 was found non significant at harvest. Primary branches plant-1 were observed maximum (6.19) from conventional tillage (Table 2). Application of 40 kg S ha-1 produced significantly highest primary branches plant-1 (6.54). Different B levels caused significant variation in primary branches plant-1. Application of 1.0 kg B ha-1 exhibited maximum primary branches plant-1 (6.26) which was at par with 2.0 kg B ha-1.
Table 2: Effect of tillage, sulphur and boron on yield attributing characters and seed yield of mustard (Pooled mean over two years)
Treatments | Yield attributing characters | Seed yield (q ha-1) | ||
Number of primary branches plant-1 | Number of secondary branches plant-1 | Number of siliqua plant-1 | ||
Tillage practices | ||||
T1-Conventional tillage | 6.19 | 26.95 | 293.81 | 10.02 |
T2- Zero Tillage | 5.92 | 25.53 | 262.83 | 8.92 |
T3- Reduced Tillage | 6.12 | 26.78 | 276.74 | 9.54 |
SEm± | 0.11 | 0.57 | 3.23 | 0.11 |
CD (P = 0.05) | NS | NS | 10.55 | 0.37 |
Sulphur levels (kg ha-1) | ||||
S1-0 | 5.76 | 25.84 | 257.43 | 8.25 |
S2-20 | 5.94 | 26.39 | 274.33 | 9.98 |
S3-40 | 6.54 | 27.02 | 301.63 | 10.25 |
SEm± | 0.14 | 0.40 | 7.81 | 0.37 |
CD (P = 0.05) | 0.42 | NS | 22.78 | 1.08 |
Boron levels (kg ha-1) | ||||
B1-0 | 5.76 | 25.38 | 250.26 | 8.39 |
B2-1.0 | 6.26 | 27.06 | 298.09 | 10.17 |
B3-2.0 | 6.21 | 26.82 | 285.04 | 9.92 |
SEm± | 0.07 | 0.39 | 5.00 | 0.17 |
CD (P = 0.05) | 0.19 | 1.10 | 14.10 | 0.49 |
Interaction | ||||
T×S | S | NS | NS | NS |
T×B | S | NS | S | NS |
S×B | NS | NS | NS | NS |
T×S×B | NS | NS | S | NS |
Table 3: Effect of tillage and sulphur on number of primary branches plant-1 of mustard (Pooled mean over two years)
Sulphur levels (kg ha-1) Tillage practices | S1-0 | S2-20 | S3-40 |
T1-Conventional tillage | 5.81 | 5.65 | 7.10 |
T2- Zero Tillage | 5.76 | 5.50 | 6.51 |
T3- Reduced Tillage | 5.70 | 6.67 | 6.00 |
SEm± | 0.25 | ||
CD (P=0.05) | 0.73 | ||
Table 4: Effect of tillage and boron on number of primary branches plant-1 of mustard (Pooled mean over two years)
Boron levels (kg ha-1) Tillage practices | B1-0 | B2-20 | B3-40 |
T1-Conventional tillage | 6.16 | 6.23 | 6.17 |
T2- Zero Tillage | 5.30 | 6.30 | 6.17 |
T3- Reduced Tillage | 5.83 | 6.24 | 6.30 |
SEm± | 0.12 | ||
CD (P=0.05) | 0.33 | ||
Number of secondary branches plant-1. Effect of tillage and S levels on number of secondary branches plant-1 was not significant at harvest. However, maximum number of secondary branches plant-1 (26.95 and 27.02) was recorded from conventional tillage and 40 kg S ha-1, respectively (Table 2). Application of 1.0 kg B ha-1 exhibited highest secondary branches plant-1 (27.06) at harvest which was at par with 2.0 kg B ha-1.
Conventional tillage produced highest number of branches i.e. both primary and secondary branches as compared to reduced and zero tillage. The number of branches plant-1 declined with the intensity of tillage from conventional to zero tillage that might be because of the reason that better soil characteristics had promoted better root growth, shoot growth and higher number of branches. These results are in conformity with the findings of Belal (2013); Mondal et al. (2008).
Yield attributing character like number of siliqua plant-1 was found to be significantly highest under conventional tillage (Table 2). Increasing the intensity of tillage from zero to reduced tillage and conventional tillage progressively increased number of siliqua plant-1 up to level of significant resulted into maximum siliqua (293.81) under conventional tillage. Significantly highest number of siliqua plant-1 (301.63) was recorded at 40 kg S ha-1. The highest number of siliqua plant-1 (298.09) was recorded with 1.0 kg B ha-1 which was at par with 2.0 kg B ha-1.
Table 5: Effect of tillage and boron on number of siliqua plant-1 of mustard (Pooled mean over two years).
Boron levels (kg ha-1) Tillage practices | B1-0 | B2-20 | B3-40 |
T1-Conventional tillage | 252.50 | 309.89 | 319.06 |
T2- Zero Tillage | 246.78 | 278.72 | 263.00 |
T3- Reduced Tillage | 251.50 | 305.67 | 273.06 |
SEm± | 8.66 | ||
CD (P=0.05) | 24.43 | ||
Table 6: Interaction effect of tillage, sulphur and boron on number of siliqua plant-1 of mustard (Pooled mean over two years)
Tillage practices | T1-CT | T2-ZT | T3-RT | ||||||
S levels (kg ha-1) B levels (kg ha-1) | S1-0 | S2-20 | S3-40 | S1-0 | S2-20 | S3-40 | S1-0 | S2-20 | S3-40 |
B1-0 | 262.67 | 235.33 | 259.50 | 252.83 | 251.67 | 235.83 | 186.17 | 276.33 | 292.00 |
B2-1.0 | 282.67 | 281.83 | 365.17 | 281.50 | 272.50 | 282.17 | 292.67 | 311.50 | 312.83 |
B3-2.0 | 250.17 | 342.50 | 364.50 | 226.17 | 240.33 | 322.50 | 282.00 | 257.00 | 280.17 |
SEm± | 15.01 | ||||||||
CD (P=0.05) | 42.31 | ||||||||
The higher number of siliqua at main shoot at conventional tillage is attributed due to taller plant and thereby longer central axis at higher intensity of tillage operations due to better growth condition. The increase in number of siliqua plant-1 may be explained due to increase in number of branches plant-1 under higher tillage levels. With conventional tillage due to better vegetative growth and initial establishment, the tissue differentiations from somatic to reproductive, meristematic activity and development of flowers occurred which later developed into siliqua. These results are in accordance with the findings of Mondal et al. (2008) ; Belal (2013).
Seed yield of mustard. Increasing the intensity of tillage from zero to reduced tillage and conventional tillage progressively increased the seed yield of mustard up to the level of significance resulted into maximum seed yield (10.02 q ha-1) under conventional tillage. Significantly highest seed yield (10.25 q ha-1) was recorded at 40 kg S ha-1. However, in case of boron application; the highest seed yield (10.17 q ha-1) was recorded with 1.0 kg B ha-1 which was at par with 2.0 kg B ha-1.
Conventional tillage gave significantly higher seed yield over zero tillage. Reduced tillage was significantly superior over zero tillage. Highest seed yield (10.02 q ha-1) was recorded in conventional tillage that was 5.03 and 12.33 % higher over reduced and zero tillage, respectively (Table 2). Increased tillage intensity enhanced seed yield significantly in conventional tillage. Highest seed yield was recorded in conventional tillage followed by reduced and zero tillage. Higher yield associated with higher tillage intensity was because of enhanced growth and yield attributes. Positive response of mustard to conventional tillage was reported by Saha et al. (2010).
Significantly highest seed yield (10.25 q ha-1) was recorded with 40 kg S ha-1 over control and was found at par with 20 kg S ha-1. Increase in seed yield due to S levels was mainly due to increased formation of reproductive structure for strengthening sink and boosted photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism which led to improved sink i.e. siliqua and seeds. Enhancement in seed yield due to S was reported by Suresh et al. (2002) that might be due to photosynthates translocation resulted into higher seed yield. These results are in conformity with Sharma and Singh (2005).
Significantly highest seed yield (10.17 q ha-1) was recorded with 1.0 kg B ha-1 over control and was at par with 2.0 kg B ha-1. This was mainly due to involvement of B in cell division and enzyme activation. With the increment in supply of essential micronutrients to mustard, their availability, acquisition, mobilization and influx into plant tissues increased and thus improved growth, yield- attributes and finally yield (Singh and Pal, 2011).
Oil content in seed. Interaction between tillage, sulphur and boron (T×S×B) was significant for oil content in seed (Table 7). Treatment combinations of T1S3B2 and T2S3B2 were found the best in terms of highest oil content (43.55 %) in seed which were found at par with T1S3B3 and T3S3B2. Similar results were also reported by Houx et al. (2014); Gaweda et al. (2016).
Table 7: Interaction effect of tillage, sulphur and boron on oil content (%) in seed of mustard (Pooled mean over two years)
Tillage practices | T1-CT | T2-ZT | T3-RT | ||||||
S levels (kg ha-1) B levels (kg ha-1) | S1-0 | S2-20 | S3-40 | S1-0 | S2-20 | S3-40 | S1-0 | S2-20 | S3-40 |
B1-0 | 36.73 | 37.08 | 38.98 | 39.15 | 37.25 | 39.08 | 36.98 | 39.15 | 38.25 |
B2-1.0 | 40.12 | 41.55 | 43.55 | 41.05 | 41.12 | 43.55 | 40.55 | 41.05 | 42.12 |
B3-2.0 | 39.35 | 39.98 | 43.52 | 40.12 | 40.35 | 41.98 | 39.52 | 40.45 | 41.18 |
SEm± | 0.54 | ||||||||
CD (P=0.05) | 1.51 | ||||||||
Thus, it might be concluded that application of 20 kg S ha-1, 1.0 kg B ha-1 and conventional tillage practice enhanced highest seed yield and oil content of mustard apart from improving growth and yield attributes of the crop.
Future research options must be focused on response of zero tilled mustard to local as well as improved varieties and application of micronutrient mixture in order to get balanced nutrition and better yield advantages.
Belal, M. (2013). Effect of irrigation and sowing method on yield and yield attributes of mustard. Rajshahi University of Life and Earth and Agricultural Science, 41, 65–70.
Dash, N. R. and Ghosh, G. K. (2012). Efficacy of gypsum and magnesium sulphate as sources of sulphur to rapeseed in lateritic soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 35(14), 2156-2166.
Dinesh, K. and Sudkep, S. (2009). Influence of soil applied sulfur and boron on yield and quality parameters of soybean. Annals of Biology, 25, 105–111.
Fisher, R. A. (1970). Statistical methods for Research workers (14th edition). Oliver and Boyd, London 356.
Gaweda, D., Cierpiala, R., Harasim, E. and Haliniarz, M. (2016). Effect of tillage systems on yield, weed infestation and seed quality elements of soybean. Acta Agrophysica, 23(2), 43–48.
Havlin, J. L., Beaton, J. D., Tisdale, S. L. and Nelson, W. L. (2004). Soil fertility and fertilizers. An introduction to nutrient management. 7th edition Pearson Education Inc., Singapore 221.
Houx, J. H., Wiebold, W. J., Fritschi, and F. B. (2014). Rotation and tillage affect soybean grain composition, yield, and nutrient removal. Field Crops Research, 164, 12-21.
Islam, M. B. (2005). Requirement of boron for mustard, wheat and chickpea-based rice cropping patterns. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Dhaka.
Kumar, H. and Yadav, D. S. (2007). Effect of phosphorus and sulphur levels on growth, yield and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cultivars. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 52(2), 154–157.
Mallick, R. B. and Raj, A. (2015). Influence of phosphorus, sulphur and boron on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics of rapeseed (Brassica compestris L. var. yellow sarson). International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 5(3), 22–27.
Mondal, N. A., Hossain, S. M. A., Bhuiya, S. U. and Jahiruddin, M. (2008). Productivity of rainfed mustard in relation to tillage and mulching. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 33(3), 597–606.
Piri, I., Nik, M. M., Tavassoli, A., Rastegaripour, F. and Babaeian, M. (2011). Effect of irrigation frequency and application levels of sulphur fertilizer on water use efficiency and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(55), 11459–11467.
Piri, ISSA and Sharma, S. N. (2006). Effect of levels and sources of sulphur on yield attributes, yield and quality of Indian mustard. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 51(3), 217–220.
Poddar, P. and Kundu, A. L. (2007). Influence of tillage systems and different dates of sowing on growth, productivity and economics of rabi rapeseed after kharif paddy. Environment and Ecology, 25, 644–647.
Rana, K.S., Rana, D.S. and Gautam, R.C. (2005). Influence of phosphorus, sulphur and boron on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 50(4), 314–316.
Saha, S., Chakraborty, D., Sharma, A. R., Tomar, R. K., Bhadraray, S., Sen, U., Behera, U. K., Purakayastha, T. J., Garg, R. N. and Kalra, N. (2010). Effect of tillage and residue management on soil properties and crop productivity in maize (Zea mays)- Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) system. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science, 80, 679–685.
Sharma, O. P. and Singh, G. D. (2005). Effect of sulphur in conjunction with growth substances on productivity of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) and residual effect on barley. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 50(1) 16–18.
Singh, S. P. and Pal, M. S. (2011). Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity, quality, nutrient uptake and economics of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 56(4), 381–387.
Stangoulis, J. C., Reid, R.J., Brown, P. H. and Graham, R. D. (2001). Kinetic analysis of boron transport in Chara. Planta, 213, 142–146.
Suresh, K., Tripathi, P. N., Room, S., Kumar, S. and Singh, R. (2002). Response of Indian mustard to sources and levels of sulphur in partially reclaimed salt affected soil. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 72(1), 22–25.
Verma, C. K., Prasad, K. and Yadav, D. D. (2012). Studies on response of sulphur, zinc and boron levels on growth and yield of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj & Cosson]. Plant Archives, 12(1), 19–21.