Effect of Multi-micronutrients Mixture on Fruit Yield and Soil Parameters of Sapota [Manilkara achras (mill.) Fosberg] cv. Kalipatti

Author:

Savdhariya S.J.1*, Patel M.J.2, Nanavati J.I.3 and Makavana P.C.4

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(12): 93-97, 2024

Address:

1Agricultural Officer, Sheth M.C. Polytechnic in Agriculture, B.A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand (Gujarat), India.

2Professor and Head, Department of Horticulture, B.A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand (Gujarat), India.

3Assistant Professor, Sheth M.C. Polytechnic in Agriculture, B.A. College of Agriculture,Anand Agricultural University, Anand (Gujarat), India.

4Junior Research Fellow, Department of Horticulture, B.A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University Anand (Gujarat), India.

(Corresponding author: Savdhariya S.J.*)

DOI: -

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

The present experiment entitled “Effect of multi-micronutrients mixture on fruit yield and soil parameters of sapota [Manilkara achras (Mill.) Fosberg] cv. Kalipatti” was carried out at Horticultural Research Farm, College of Horticulture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand during the years 2020-21 & 2021-22. The experiment was laid out in Completely Randomized Design with three repetitions and eleven treatments. Among the different treatments, T10(the foliar application of multi-micronutrients mixture grade-IV @ 1% spray at flowering and pea stage with soil application of micronutrient grade-V @ 125g/tree as basal) exhibited significantly maximum fruit weight (81.53 g), fruit volume (81.77 cc), fruit length (6.06 cm), fruit diameter (6.07 cm), number of fruits per tree (1325) and yield (108.43 kg/tree and 10.84 t/ha) with highest net realization i.e., Rs. 175362 with BCR (1.83) in sapota cv. Kalipatti. Micronutrients like Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and B in soil also found significantly higher due to foliar application of multi-micronutrient mixture grade-IV @1% spray at flowering and pea stage with soil application of micronutrient grade-V @ 125 g/tree in sapota.

Keywords

Sapota, Multi-micronutrients mixture, yield, Soil micronutrient content, Economics.

Introduction

Sapota or sapodilla [Manilkara achras (Mill.) Fosberg] is an important tropical fruit crop grown in subtropical region of the world. It is one of the prominent dessert fruits and an economically important species of the Sapotaceae family and the order Ebenales, a long-lived evergreen tree, native to southern Mexico, central America from where it spread to other country. Sapota fruit is climacteric in nature therefore; it is harvested at matured stage and ripened at ambient temperature. The fully ripe fruits are highly delicious, with excellent sweet taste and have a pleasant aroma.

Micronutrients play an important role in crop production due to their essentiality in plant metabolism and adverse effects that manifest due to their deficiency (Bijay et al., 2023).  Besides affecting plant growth, micronutrients also play a major role in disease resistance in cultivated crop species. Micronutrients can tremendously boost up the crop yield and improve economy and post-harvest life of horticultural produce (Raja, 2009). The foliar application of micronutrients has a very important role in improving fruit set, productivity and economy of fruits. It has also a beneficial role in recovery of nutritional and physiological disorders in fruit trees. The nutrients required in large quantity are supplied through soil application (Fageria et al., 2009) but nutrients needed in lower quantity can be better absorbed through foliar spray (Fageria et al., 2009; Girma et al., 2007). Thus, micronutrients like zinc, iron and boron are essentially as important as macronutrients to have better growth, yield, fruit retention and quality of fruit plants. However, meagre information is available on the effect of micronutrients on yield of sapota. Therefore, based on possible benefit of micronutrients on yield of fruit crops, the present study has been planned. 

Material & Methods

The field experiment was carried out on 21-year-old trees planted at space of 10 × 10 m at Horticultural Research Farm, College of Horticulture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand for the years 2020-21 & 2021-22. The experiment was laid out in Completely Randomized Design having eleven treatments viz., T1: Micronutrient grade-I @ 0.5%spray at flowering and at pea stage, T2: Micronutrient grade-I @ 1% spray at flowering and at pea stage, T3: Micronutrient grade-IV @ 0.5% spray at flowering and at pea stage, T4: Micronutrient grade-IV @ 1% spray at flowering and at pea stage, T5: Micronutrient grade-V @ 125 g/tree soil application as basal in July, T6: Micronutrient grade-V @ 250 g/tree soil application as basal in July, T7: T1 + T6(Micronutrient grade-I @ 0.5% spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade-V @ 250 g/tree soil application as basal in July, T8: T2 + T5 (Micronutrient grade-I @ 1% spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade-V @ 125 g/tree soil application as basal in July, T9: T3 + T6 (Micronutrient grade-IV @ 0.5% spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade-V @ 250 g/tree soil application as basal in July, T10: T4 + T5 (Micronutrient grade-IV @ 1% spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade-V @ 125 g/tree soil application as basal in July) and T11: Control. The treatments were repeated thrice and one tree per treatment. Multi micronutrient grade I & IV were given in the form of foliar application as per treatments. First spray was given at initiation of flowering i.e. in August month, while second spray was given at pea stage of fruit set i.e., in November month during the year 2020-21 and 2021-22. Multi-micronutrient grade V was given in a ring at two meters distance from main trunk as soil application in the July month. Besides this, 1000 g nitrogen, 500 g phosphorus and 500 g potash per tree were given as recommended dose of fertilizers in all treatments. Full dose of FYM, phosphorus and potash and half dose of nitrogen were given as basal dose in July whereas, remaining half dose of nitrogen was given in October in both the years.

Results & Discussion

A. Effect of multi micronutrients mixture on fruit weight (g)

The data presented in Table 1 showed that among different treatments, significantly higher fruit weight (81.41, 81.66 and 81.53g) was recorded with T10 in2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled, respectively and it was at par with T4, T7, T8 and T9 in 2020-21, T3, T4, T7, T8 and T9 in 2021-22 whereas, T8 and T9 during pooled analysis. The interaction effect (Y× T) on fruit weight was found non- significant during the course of study. The cumulative effect of mixture of micronutrients might have resulted in higher fruit weight by the faster loading and mobilization of photo assimilates to fruit and involvement in cell division and cell expansion which ultimately reflected into more weight of fruit in treated plants. It was supported by Modi et al. (2021) in sapota.

B. Effect of multi micronutrients mixture on fruit volume (cc)

Maximum fruit volume (81.59, 81.95 and 81.77 cc) was registered with the same treatment T10 and it was significantly at par with T9 in 2020-21 and pooled analysis while, T8 and T9 in 2021-22. Data revealed non-significant interaction (Y× T) effect on fruit volume. This increase in fruit volume might be due to the availability of more micronutrients which leads to more photosynthetic activity and better dry matter accumulation as the zinc plays vital role to promote starch formation, iron required to suitable cell enlargement and cell division and boron actively involved in transportation of carbon in plants. Confirmatory results were found by Modi et al. (2021) in sapota.

C. Effect of multi micronutrients mixture on fruit length (cm)

Data (Table 1) for both the successive years of study (2020-21 and 2021-22) as well as pooled analysis accounted significantly maximum fruit length (6.04, 6.08 and 6.06 cm) obtained with T10 treatment, respectively. It was at par with T8 and T9 in 2020-21 and T3, T4, T7, T8 and T9 in 2021-22. In pooled analysis it was found at par with T9. The interaction effect (Y×T) on fruit length was found non-significant during the course of study. The increase in fruit length was possibly due to boron appears to have direct role in hastening the process of cell division and cell elongation due to which length of the fruit is increased. Zinc helps in regulating the cell wall permeability, thereby allowing more mobilization of water in fruits that contributed to the greater fruit length. The present results are in conformity with the findings of Khopade et al. (2015); Modi et al. (2021) in sapota.

D. Effect of multi micronutrients mixture on fruit diameter(cm)

Among the different treatments, T10 (Micronutrient grade IV @ 1 % spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade V @ 125 g/tree soil application at basal in July) had significantly higher fruit diameter (6.01, 6.13 and 6.07 cm) in 2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled, respectively, and it was at par with T3, T4, T7, T8 and T9 in 2020-21 and 2021-22. In pooled analysis it was at par with treatments T7, T8 and T9. The fruit diameter during the investigation period might be increased due to the favorable effect was attributed to the fact that the zinc is essential in the nitrogen metabolism and it also increase the synthesis of auxin which promote the cell size. These findings are in conformity with those of Khopade et al. (2015); Modi et al. (2021) in sapota.

E. Effect of multi micronutrients mixture on number of fruits per tree

A perusal of data presented in Table 2 observed significantly maximum number of fruits per tree (1318, 1333 and 1325) with treatment T10 (Micronutrient grade IV@ 1 % spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade V 125 g/tree soil application at basal inJuly) in 2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled, respectively, which was at par with T4, T7, T8and T9in 2020-21, 2021-22 and in pooled analysis. The minimum number of fruits per tree (1122, 1131 and 1127) was recorded in 2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled data, respectively with treatment T11(control). Whereas, an interaction effect (Y × T) on number of fruits per tree was found non- significant. Different grades of micronutrients when applied to tree alone or in combination involved directly in various physiological processes and enzymatic activity. This might have resulted into better photosynthesis, greater accumulation of starch in fruit and involvement of zinc in auxin synthesis and B in translocation of starch to fruit. The balance of auxin in plant regulates the fruit drop or retention in plants, which altered the control of fruit drop and increased the total number of fruits per tree. Moreover, boron plays a part in fruit setting, which ultimately leads to an increase in the number of fruits produced per tree (Thompson and Batjer 1950). These findings are in agreement with Khopade et al. (2015); Modi et al. (2021) in sapota.

F. Effect of  multi micronutrients mixture on yield (kg/tree and t/ha)

It was found that among different treatments, T10 (Micronutrient grade IV@1% spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade V@ 125 g/tree soil application at basal i.e., in July) resulted in significantly maximum fruit yield (107.18, 109.68, 108.43 kg/tree and 10.72, 10.97 and 10.84 t/ha) in 2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled, respectively, which was at par with T7, T8 and T9 during 2020-21 and 2021-22. In pooled analysis it was at par with T9. The minimum fruit yield (77.95,78.75 and 78.35kg/tree and 7.80,7.87 and 7.84t/ha) was recorded in 2020-21, 2021-22 and pooled data, respectively with treatment T11(control). The interaction (Y × T) and year effects on fruit yield was found significant.

This influence might be due to fact that micronutrients like boron, zinc and iron helped in increase in chlorophyll content and leaf area which together have accelerate the photosynthesis rate that increase in supply of carbohydrates to the plant and finally increase the yield of plant. Spray of boron increase the pollen tube germination and elongation as a result of higher fruit set percent and ultimately yield. Application of treatment T10 resulted higher number of fruits per tree, higher fruit weight and higher fruit volume which eventually observed in terms of higher fruit volume which eventually observed in terms of higher fruit yield per tree. Micronutrients helps in reduce flower drop and increase the fruit retention Corresponding results were found by Khopade et al. (2015); Modi et al. (2021) in sapota.

Table 1: Effect of multi-micronutrients mixture on different yield parameters of sapota.

Treatment No.

Av. fruit weight(g)

Av. Fruit volume (cc)

Fruit Length(cm)

Fruit diameter (cm)

Number of fruits/tree

Fruit yield (Kg/tree)

Fruit yield(t/ha)

2020-

21

2021-

22

Pooled

2020-

21

2021-

22

Pooled

2020-

21

2021-

22

Pooled

2020-

21

2021-

22

Pooled

2020-

21

2021-

22

Pooled

2020-

21

2021-

22

Pooled

2020-

21

2021-

22

Pooled

T1

71.78

72.31

72.04

71.11

71.67

71.39

5.26

5.46

5.36

5.45

5.47

5.46

1172

1179

1175

83.21

84.65

83.93

8.32

8.47

8.39

T2

72.79

73.16

72.97

72.18

72.45

72.32

5.31

5.52

5.41

5.50

5.53

5.52

1193

1120

1156

85.09

86.72

85.91

8.51

8.67

8.59

T3

73.49

73.86

73.68

73.07

73.25

73.16

5.47

5.60

5.53

5.60

5.66

5.63

1212

1217

1215

88.03

90.10

89.06

8.80

9.01

8.91

T4

74.93

75.22

75.07

73.31

73.74

73.52

5.53

5.67

5.60

5.61

5.71

5.66

1258

1274

1266

93.49

93.90

93.70

9.35

9.39

9.37

T5

70.71

71.05

70.88

70.08

70.15

70.12

5.03

5.31

5.17

5.46

5.27

5.37

1132

1159

1145

79.80

80.78

80.29

7.98

8.08

8.03

T6

71.63

71.87

71.75

71.44

71.01

71.22

5.19

5.39

5.29

5.36

5.44

5.40

1156

1184

1170

81.57

82.91

82.24

8.16

8.29

8.22

T7

75.03

75.13

75.08

74.47

74.75

74.61

5.59

5.77

5.68

5.76

5.80

5.78

1270

1276

1273

95.45

97.15

96.30

9.55

9.72

9.63

T8

76.44

76.62

76.53

75.96

76.23

76.10

5.62

5.81

5.71

5.84

5.90

5.87

1281

1284

1283

97.06

99.05

98.05

9.71

9.90

9.81

T9

78.92

79.26

79.09

78.53

78.75

78.64

5.69

5.88

5.79

5.95

5.99

5.97

1299

1315

1307

103.18

105.75

104.46

10.32

10.58

10.45

T10

81.41

81.66

81.53

81.59

81.95

81.77

6.04

6.08

6.06

6.01

6.13

6.07

1318

1333

1325

107.18

109.68

108.43

10.72

10.97

10.84

T11

70.09

70.66

70.38

70.26

70.32

70.29

4.90

5.13

5.01

5.08

5.14

5.11

1122

1131

1127

77.95

78.75

78.35

7.80

7.87

7.84


T

S.Em ±

2.63

2.66

1.76

1.74

2.23

1.33

0.15

0.16

0.10

0.15

0.17

0.11

32.6

36.4

23.7

4.45

4.34

3.11

0.44

0.43

0.31

C.D.

(P=0.05)

7.77

7.84

5.34

5.10

6.53

3.77

0.43

0.48

0.29

0.43

0.50

0.30

95.7

106.8

67.4

13.12

12.80

8.88

1.31

1.28

0.89


Y

S.Em ±

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.39

-

-

0.13

C.D.

(P=0.05)

-

-

NS

-

-

NS

-

-

NS

-

-

NS

-

-

NS

-

-

3.97

-

-

0.40


Y x T

S.Em ±

-

-

2.65

-

-

2.00

-

-

0.15

-


0.16

-

-

34.6

-

-

4.39

-

-

0.43

C.D.(P=0.05)

-

-

NS

-

-

NS

-

-

NS

-


NS

-

-

NS

-

-

12.55

-

-

1.26

C.V.%

6.14

6.17

6.16

4.08

5.21

4.68

4.67

5.00

4.84

4.49

5.20

4.86

4.63

5.15

4.90

8.54

8.19

8.36

8.54

8.19

8.36

Table 2: Effect of multi-micronutrients mixture on micronutrient content in soil after two years of experiment in sapota.

Treatment No.

Treatment Details

Nutrient content(mg/kg)

Fe

Mn

Zn

Cu

B

Initial status

5.68

6.63

0.73

1.00

0.13

After two years of experiment

T1

Micronutrient grade I@0.5% spray at

Flowering and at pea stage

6.24

6.63

0.80

1.07

0.15

T2

Micronutrient grade I@1% spray at

Flowering and at pea stage

6.36

6.77

0.83

1.10

0.15

T3

Micronutrient grade IV@0.5% spray at

Flowering and at pea stage

6.43

6.85

0.85

1.12

0.16

T4

Micronutrient grade IV@1%spray at

Flowering and at pea stage

6.51

6.98

0.88

1.11

0.17

T5

Micronutrient gradeV@125g/tree soil

Application at basal i.e. in July

5.91

6.47

0.76

1.04

0.13

T6

Micronutrient gradeV@250g/tree soil

Application at basal i.e.in July

6.13

6.54

0.77

1.06

0.14

T7

Micronutrient grade-I @ 0.5% spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade-V@250g/tree soil application i.e. in July

6.63

7.05

0.91

1.13

0.18

T8

Micronutrient grade-I @1% spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade–V@125g/tree soil application at basal i.e. in July

6.78

7.11

0.94

1.12

0.19

T9

Micronutrient grade IV @ 0.5% spray at flowering and at pea stage + Micronutrient grade V @ 250 g/tree soil application at basal i.e. in July

6.83

7.18

0.96

1.14

0.19

T10

Micronutrient grade IV@1% spray at flowering and at pea stage + Micronutrient grade V @ 125 g/tree soil application at basal i.e.in July

6.91

7.30

0.97

1.15

0.20

T11

Control

5.70

6.42

0.73

1.02

0.13

S.Em +

0.153

0.17

0.025

0.013

0.06

C.D.(P=0.05)

0.449

0.507

0.075

0.039

0.017

CV%

4.14

4.38

5.14

2.08

6.17

Effect of multi micronutrients mixture on soil parameters 

Available iron content in soil. The result showed that among the different treatments, T10 recorded significantly highest iron content (6.91 mg/kg) in soil after completion of two years of experiment and it was found at par with T4, T7, T8 and T9. The initial value before starting of experiment was recorded 5.68 mg/kg.

Available manganese content in soil. The result showed that among the different treatments, T10 recorded significantly higher manganese content (7.30 mg/kg) in soil after completion of two years of experiment and it was found at par with T3, T4, T7, T8 and T9. The initial value before starting of experiment was recorded 6.63 mg/kg.

Available zinc content in soil. The result indicate that among the different treatments, T10 recorded significantly higher zinc content (0.97 mg/kg) in soil after completion of two years of experiment and it was found at par with T7, T8 and T9. The available zinc content in soil was increased with treatment T10might be due to soil application of zinc and other micronutrients mixture as grade V in soil. The initial value before starting of experiment was recorded 0.73 mg/kg.

Available copper content in soil. The result showed that among the different treatments, T10 recorded significantly higher copper content (1.15 mg/kg) in soil after completion of two years of experiment and it was found at par with T3, T4, T7, T8 and T9. The initial value before starting of experiment was recorded 1.00 mg/kg.

Available boron content in soil. The result showed that among the different treatments, T10 recorded significantly higher boron content (0.20 mg/kg) in soil after completion of two years of experiment and it was found at par with T7, T8 and T9. The initial value before starting of experiment was recorded 0.13 mg/kg.

Table 3: Economics of different multi-micronutrients mixture grades treatment in sapota cv. Kalipatti.


Treat. No.


Fruit yield (t/ha)


Gross realization (Rs. /ha)

Common cost

of cultivation

(Rs/ha)


Treatment cost

(Rs./ha)

Total cost of cultivation 

(Rs. /ha)


Net realization 

(Rs. /ha)


Benefit cost ratio

T1

8.39

209750

82323

5660

87983

121767

1.38

T2

8.59

214750

82323

5960

88283

126467

1.43

T3

8.91

222750

82323

7560

89883

132867

1.48

T4

9.37

234250

82323

9760

92083

142167

1.54

T5

8.03

200750

82323

3555

85878

114872

1.34

T6

8.22

205500

82323

4430

86753

118747

1.36

T7

9.63

240750

82323

10090

92413

148337

1.60

T8

9.81

245250

82323

9515

91838

153412

1.67

T9

10.45

261250

82323

11990

94313

166937

1.77

T10

10.84

271000

82323

13315

95638

175362

1.83

T11

7.84

196000

82323

0

82323

113677

1.38

Selling price of sapota fruit: Rs. 25/kg

Effect on economics. The data revealed that among the different treatments, T10(Micronutrient grade IV @ 1% spray at flowering and pea stage + Micronutrient grade V@125g/trees oil application at basal in July) has the highest net realization i.e., Rs. 175362 with BCR (1.83).

Conclusion

From the foregoing investigation of two years, it can be concluded that the application of micronutrient grade IV @ 1% spray at flowering and pea stage with micronutrient grade - V 125 g/tree soil application as basal in July was found effective in increasing yield and net profit in sapota cv. Kalipatti. Moreover it also increased micronutrients like Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and B contents in soil.

Future Scope

The foliar application of multi-micronutrients mixture grade-IV @ 1% spray at flowering and pea stage with soil application of micronutrient grade-V @ (125g/tree as basal can be used to increase fruit weight, fruit volume, fruit length, fruit diameter, number of fruits per tree  and yield  with highest net realization  in sapota cv. Kalipatti.

References

Bijay, K. B., Kundan, K., Deepa, S., Dash, S. N., Panda, R. K., Ankita, S. and Kuldeep, K. S. (2023). Yield attributing traits and  economic efficiency of pineapple as influenced by plant growth regulators and micronutrients. Biological Forum- An International Journal, 15(1), 264-267.

Fageria, N. K., Filho, M. P. B., Moreira, A. and Guimaraes, C. M. (2009). Foliar fertilization of crop plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32(6), 1044-1064.

Girma, K., Martin, K. L., Freeman, K. W., Mosali, J., Teal, R. K., Raun, W. R., Moges, S. M. and Arnall, D. B. (2007). Determination of optimum  rate and growth for foliar applied phosphorus in corn. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 38 (9), 1137– 1154.

Khopade, R. Y., Patel, A. N., Hiray, S. A. and Ghadage, N. J. (2015). Effect of biofertilizers, GA3 and micronutrients on yield and economics of sapota cv. Kalipatti. Trends in Biosciences, 8(18), 5019-5021.

Modi, P. K., Patel, A. P., Patel, A. R., Patel, A. N., Ahir, T. R., Bisane, K. D. and Naik, B. M. (2021). Synergistic influence of bio-fertilizers, growth regulator and micronutrients on yield and economics of sapota cv. Kalipatti. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 33(21), 107-116.

Raja, E. M. (2009). Importance of micronutrients in the changing horticultural scenario. Journal of Horticulture Science, 4(1), 1-27.

Thompson, A. H. and Batjer, L. P. (1950). The effect of boron in germinating medium on pollen germination and pollen tube growth for several deciduous fruit trees. Proceeding for the American Society of Horticulture Sciences, 56, 227-230.

How to cite this article

Savdhariya S.J., Patel M.J., Nanavati J.I. and Makavana P.C.  (2024). Effect of Multi-micronutrients Mixture on Fruit Yield and Soil Parameters of Sapota [Manilkara achras (mill.) Fosberg] cv. Kalipatti. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(12): 93-97.