Author:
Swagat Ranjan Mund1, Sukirti Mohanty1*, Subhendu Jena1 and Debi Archana Nayak2
Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(6): 09-13, 2025
Address:
1Department of Floriculture & Landscaping, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be) University, Bhubaneswar (Odisha), India.
2Department of Vegetable Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be) University, Bhubaneswar (Odisha), India.
(Corresponding author: Sukirti Mohanty*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.6.3
Spacing, Nitrogen, China Aster, Cut flower, Growth and yield
China aster (Callistephus chinensis L. Nees.) cv. Powder puff mix is a semi-hardy winter annual crop belonging to the family Asteraceae. The genus Callistephus is derived from two Greek words 'kalli'- meaning beautiful and 'stephos'- meaning a crown in reference to the flowers. The flower having commercial value is native to China and has spread to Europe and other tropical countries during 1731 A.D. The present day asters have been developed from a single form of wild species, Callistephus chinensis. It is commercially grown in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and West Bengal. In our state, the significant area and production data is yet to be achieved. In Odisha, China aster can be grown during rabi season, as a heavy feeder crop for which, nutrient management is of prime importance.
Increased flower production, quality of flowers and perfection in the form of plants are important objectives to be reckoned in commercial flower production. Although china aster is being grown in a considerable area, its cultivation is concentrated around big cities and there is a need to popularize under different agro-climatic conditions. Though the crop has great significant in the market due to good production, quantity but there are some bottlenecks associated in its cultivation. Non availability of quality planting materials, lack of improved varieties, uneven flower maturity, high market fluctuation are some of the problems which are often faced by farmers.
Proper spacing is another important factor, which is dependent on the variety, soil and climatic conditions. If plants are closely planted, it results in competition for fertilizer, water and sunlight etc. and causes poor growth of plants whereas wider spacing results in wastage of valuable space. Therefore, it is essential to know the proper spacing and requirement of fertilizer doses of crop or a variety under a particular soil and agro-climatic conditions.
The present investigation entitled “Effect of nitrogen and spacing on growth and yield of China aster (Callistephus chinensis L. Nees.) cv. Powder puff mix” was carried out during 2019-20 at Agricultural Research Station, Chhatabar; Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Bhubaneswar. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with factorial concept where eight treatment combinations were replicated thrice. The treatment comprised of two levels of spacing viz., 60 × 40 cm (S1), 40 × 30 cm (S2) and three levels of nitrogen doses i.e. 200 kg/ha (N1), 150 kg/ha (N2) and 100 kg/ha (N3). Nitrogen was applied in two split doses viz., i.e. 50 % in basal and rest 50% as topdressing after 40 days of transplanting along with recommended dose of phosphorus and potassium. Observations on various vegetative parameters such as Plant height (cm), Number of leaves per plant , Plant spread (cm), Number of primary branches, Number of secondary branches; and flowering parameters such as Number of days taken for first flower bud formation, Number of buds per plant, Number of Flowers per plant, Number of Flowers per plot, Vase life of flowers (days), Duration of flowering in plot (day), Stalk length (cm), Flower diameter (cm), Flower weight (g), Flower yield per plot (kg), Number of days taken for flower opening (bud to bloom). All the data concerning various vegetative growth parameters and flowering components such as flower characters and quantity were analyzed statistically. The critical difference at 5 % level was calculated for comparing treatment means.
Vegetative parameters. The best result of plant height (42.68 cm) was noted with the plant spacing of 60*40 cm and the higher plant height of 44.48 cm was noted with the application of nitrogen @ 150kg/ha Similar findings with respect to nutrient quantity was obtained by Varma et al. (2023). Maximum number of leaves count (21.39) primary and secondary branch count of 11.64 and 14.66 respectively were recorded with the spacing of 60*40 cm. Similar result of higher count in terms of leaves and branches were accounted with application of 150 kg/ha of nitrogen (Table 1). Reduction in plant spread was registered with higher plant spacing. The highest plant spread was noted with 40*30 cm spacing and 79.77 cm was noted with application of nitrogen @150kg/ha. Similar results have been reported by Pandey et al. (2024) in china aster. In account of the interaction effect the highest observations in terms of plant height, Number of leaves, Number of branches, plant spread were recorded with S1N2(s1- 60*40 cm, N2-150kg/Ha). Significant increase in plant height may be due to better nutrition which leads to increased photosynthesis activity, as nitrogen is important constituent of nucleic acid and it might have increased the synthesis of carbohydrate, amino acids etc. and wider spacing took the advantage of more space, moisture, light and air for growth. This is in line with Mishra et al. (2018). Reason for increase in number of leaves were found due to the cell division, cell enlargement, better nutrition and wider spacing helped the plants to utilize the energy properly in the production of leaves. Similar positive effect was also recorded by Sunita et al. (2007); Yadav et al. (2004). Reason for increase in plant spread may be nitrogenous compounds such as proteins, amino acids, nucleic acids, various enzymes and coenzymes which were responsible for cell division and cell enlargement and wider spacing might have helped the plants for utilization of nutrients and less competition. This finding corroborates with the findings of Dixit (2004); Kumar et al. (2014); Shah et al. (2005). Similar increase in number of branches may be attributed to the availability of more space for growth of roots and shoots as well as utilization of more nutrients by the plants, less competition among the plants for available resources and overlapping from adjacent plants. The results are in conformation with Kumar et al. (2014); Chauhan et al. (2014).
Reproductive Parameters. The minimum number of days taken for first flower bud initiation accounted in spacing of 40*30 cm along with nitrogen dose of 150 kg/ha, Amongst the interaction effects, early flower bud initiation 62.33 days was noted in the treatment S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha) Similar results have been reported by Pandey et al. (2024) in china aster. the maximum number of flower bud per plant, Number of flowers per plant , Number of flowers per plot were registered in the spacing of 40*30 cm along with nitrogen dose of 150 kg/ha . minimum days taken for flower opening (bud-bloom) 10.75 days was recorded with the plant spacing of 60 × 40 cm, where as Minimum bud-bloom period of 9.67 days was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha Similar findings was recorded by Sandhu et al. (2024) in china aster var. arka poornima. While considering the interaction effects, 9.33 days of bud-bloom period was noted in the interaction of treatment S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha). Maximum flower buds of 14.03 numbers was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and 13.57 was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha, which was significantly higher over other treatments. Similarly maximum number of flower buds 15.20 were noted due to the interaction of treatment S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha) which was at par with interactions of S2N1 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N1-200 kg/ha) 14.20 and found significant. Maximum number of flowers per plant of 15.96 was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and 15.65 was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha, which was significantly higher over other treatments. The highest number of flowers per plant 17.93 was noted due to the interaction effects of nitrogen and spacing S1N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha). The reason for earliness could be attributed to early completion of vegetative growth and changing of vegetative primordia to reproductive primordia, probably due to the secretion of growth promoting substances and closer spacing helped the plants in less vegetative growth, which was in confirmation with the findings of Mishra et al. (2018). Similar results in increasing flowering period have been reported by Vijaykumar et al. (1988). corresponding reduction in number of flower buds registered with the maximum plant spacing because nitrogen accelerate the development of reproductive phase and closer spacing results more competition. Similar results in increasing number of flower buds have been reported by Dhemre et al. (1997). The increase in flower yield might be due to application of the higher nitrogen dose and active role of nitrogen in producing more vigorous growth of plant due to the production and accumulation of more photosynthates. This may also be fact that optimum plant population per unit area and better nutrient levels brought better growth of plant which resulted in more flowers. Similar findings were also reported by Birade et al. (2003); Mishra et al. (2018); Acharya and Dashora (2004).
Yield Parameters. Maximum number of flowers per plot 52.92 was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha (53.67), which was significantly higher over other treatments (Table 2) These results were in close similarity to that of varma et al. (2023) in gompherna. Due to the interaction effects of nitrogen and spacing S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha) recorded the highest number of flowers per plot (55). Maximum duration of flowering in plot of 40.25 days was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and 40.83 days was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha, which was significantly higher over other treatments. Similarly longer duration of flowering in plots (44.00 days) was noted due to the interaction effects of nitrogen and spacing S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha). Maximum fresh weight of flower 10.24 g was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and 10.15 g was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha, which was significantly higher over other treatments. Application of different levels of nitrogen and spacing significantly influenced the weight of flower due to the interaction effects and 10.83 g was noted as highest in S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha). Maximum yield per plot 1.29 kg was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and 1.22 kg was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha, which was significantly higher over other treatments. Yield per plot 1.56 kg was noted due to the interaction effects of nitrogen and spacing S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha). Maximum flower diameter of 8.41 cm was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and 8.65 cm was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha, which was significantly higher over other treatments. Flower diameter 9.27 cm was noted due to the interaction effects of nitrogen and spacing S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha) which was the maximum. Maximum stalk length of 28.17 cm was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and 29.22 cm was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha, which was higher over other treatments. Stalk length of 31.23 cm was noted due to the interaction effects of nitrogen and spacing S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha) which was at par with interactions and found non-significant. Maximum vase life of 11.08 days was registered in plant spacing at 40 × 30 cm and 11.33 days was recorded with the application of nitrogen 150 kg/ha, which was significantly higher over other treatments. Vase life 12.33 days was noted due to the interaction effects of nitrogen and spacing in S2N2 (Spacing- 40 × 30 cm and Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha) which observed as the highest and was at par with interactions and found non-significant. The minimum vase life 7.33 days was recorded in treatment S1N0 (control) receiving nitrogen 0 kg/ha with spacing 60 × 40 cm. Photosynthesis enhanced food production which might have resulted in better plant growth and enhance the number of flowers per plot, the higher yield in terms of flowers per unit area can be attributed to the higher population per unit area with closer spacing levels. Similar results in increasing number of flowers per plot have been reported by Rajesh et al. (2012); Mishra et al. (2018). Increase in duration of flowering in plots and flowers remained presentable for maximum time in the plants because nitrogen helps in increasing growth parameters and translocation and accumulation of photosynthates might be the reason for increase in flowering duration. Similar results in increasing duration of flowering have been reported by Jamkhande et al. (2004); Singh et al. (2018). As nitrogen influence the growth characters which will in turn increase the photo-assimilates diversion to the developing flower buds and thus increased the flower weight. Closer spacing might be optimum which increased root activity to overcome competition and distined the nutrients to sink by means of higher uptake. Similar results in increasing weight of flower have been reported by Acharya and Dashora (2004); Singh and Sangma (2001); Jules Jonick and Durkin (1968); Mishra et al. (2018). The increase in flower yield per plot might be due to numerically more number of plants per plot. Supply of nitrogen to the plant is considered to be important in promoting rapid growth with increase in net photosynthesis. Similar results in increasing yield per plot have been reported by Dixit (2004); Maharnoe et al. (2011); Khobragade et al. (2012); Chauhan et al. (2014); Karavadia and Dhaduk (2002); Rajesh et al. (2012). Flower diameter increased due to optimum spacing and efficient utilization of soil surface area along with more sunlight further higher root activity because of competition between plants might have accumulated higher carbohydrate reserves. Similar results in increasing flower diameter have been reported by Jamkhand et al. (2004); Belorkar et al. (1992); Koley and Khan (2012). The increase in stalk length may be attributed to growth on radial aspect of plant as observed through increase in plant height with nutrient application. Plants tend to grow vertically when they are crowded owing to shadowing effect of plants on one another. Similar results have been reported by Maharnor et al. (2011); Barman and Pal (1992); Singh et al. (2018). Application of nutrient sources influences flower longevity due to the increased nutrient uptake by plants and greater development of water conducting tissue. Similar results have been reported by Rajan et al. (2019).
Table 1: Effect of nitrogen and spacing on Plant height, Number of leaves, Plant spread, primary and secondary branches, days taken for bud formation, days taken for flower opening (bud-bloom) of China Aster.
Treatments | Plant height (cm) | Number of leaves | Plant spread (cm) | Primary branches | Secondary branches | Days taken for bud formation | Days taken for flower opening (bud-bloom) (days) |
Factor A : Spacing (S) | |||||||
S1 - 60 × 40 cm | 42.68 | 21.39 | 72.91 | 11.64 | 14.66 | 66.50 | 12.25 |
S2 - 40 × 30 cm | 41.19 | 20.18 | 74.37 | 10.98 | 13.66 | 64.83 | 10.75 |
Sem(±) | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.24 |
CD at 5% | 2.50 | 1.16 | 2.44 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 1.99 | 0.47 |
Factor B : Nutrients (N) | |||||||
N0 – Control | 37.43 | 18.48 | 68.87 | 9.35 | 11.82 | 66.50 | 12.67 |
N1- Nitrogen @ 200 kg/ha | 44.07 | 21.65 | 74.32 | 11.93 | 15.15 | 66.83 | 11.00 |
N2- Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha | 44.48 | 22.68 | 79.77 | 13.27 | 16.35 | 64.00 | 9.67 |
N3- Nitrogen @ 100 kg/ha | 41.75 | 20.02 | 71.60 | 10.68 | 13.32 | 65.33 | 12.50 |
Sem(±) | 0.67 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.53 | 0.26 |
CD at 5% | 3.53 | 1.48 | 3.46 | 0.95 | 1.02 | 2.82 | 0.90 |
Interactions (S × N) | |||||||
S1N0 (S1-60 × 40 cm, N0-Control) | 37.03 | 18.37 | 67.37 | 8.40 | 11.47 | 67.67 | 15.00 |
S1N1 (S1-60 × 40 cm, N1-200 kg/ha) | 45.13 | 22.73 | 71.93 | 12.73 | 15.23 | 68.00 | 11.33 |
S1N2 (S1-60 × 40 cm, N2-150 kg/ha) | 46.90 | 24.90 | 83.07 | 14.33 | 17.80 | 65.67 | 10.00 |
S1N3 (S1-60 × 40 cm, N3-100 kg/ha) | 41.63 | 19.57 | 69.27 | 11.10 | 14.13 | 64.67 | 12.67 |
S2N0 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N0-Control) | 37.83 | 18.60 | 70.37 | 10.30 | 12.17 | 65.33 | 10.33 |
S2N1 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N1-200 kg/ha) | 42.07 | 20.57 | 76.70 | 12.20 | 15.07 | 65.67 | 10.67 |
S2N2 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N2-150 kg/ha) | 43.00 | 20.47 | 76.47 | 11.13 | 14.90 | 62.33 | 9.33 |
S2N3 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N3-100 kg/ha) | 41.87 | 21.10 | 73.93 | 10.27 | 12.50 | 66.00 | 12.33 |
Sem(±) | 0.94 | 0.66 | 0.92 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 0.37 |
CD at 5% | 5.00 | 3.51 | 4.89 | 1.20 | 1.24 | 3.99 | 1.24 |
Table 2: Effect of nitrogen and spacing on duration of flowering in plot, flower diameter, number of flower buds/plant, number of flowers/plant, number of flowers/plot, weight of flower, stalk length, yield/plot, vase life of China Aster.
Treatments | Duration of flowering in plot (days) | Flower diameter | Number of flower buds per plant | Number of flowers per plant | Number of flowers per plot | Weight of flower (g) | Stalk length (cm) | Yield per plot (kg) | Vase life (days) |
Factor A : Spacing (S) | |||||||||
S1 - 60 × 40 cm | 37.67 | 7.75 | 11.45 | 12.17 | 47.92 | 8.75 | 25.28 | 0.83 | 8.92 |
S2 - 40 × 30 cm | 40.25 | 8.41 | 14.03 | 15.96 | 52.92 | 10.24 | 28.17 | 1.29 | 11.08 |
Sem(±) | 0.49 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.47 | 0.10 | 0.46 | 0.01 | 0.25 |
CD at 5% | 1.58 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 1.46 | 0.51 | 1.45 | 0.07 | 1.33 |
Factor B : Nutrients (N) | |||||||||
N0 – Control | 37.33 | 7.23 | 11.72 | 12.52 | 46.00 | 8.45 | 23.98 | 0.83 | 8.67 |
N1- Nitrogen @ 200 kg/ha | 39.67 | 8.55 | 13.53 | 14.63 | 52.33 | 9.85 | 28.43 | 1.13 | 10.33 |
N2- Nitrogen @ 150 kg/ha | 40.83 | 8.65 | 13.57 | 15.65 | 53.67 | 10.15 | 29.22 | 1.22 | 11.33 |
N3- Nitrogen @ 100 kg/ha | 38.00 | 7.85 | 12.13 | 13.45 | 49.67 | 9.53 | 25.27 | 1.04 | 9.67 |
Sem(±) | 0.69 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.66 | 0.14 | 0.66 | 0.02 | 0.35 |
CD at 5% | 2.04 | 0.97 | 1.11 | 0.98 | 2.08 | 0.72 | 1.86 | 0.10 | 1.88 |
Interactions (S × N) | |||||||||
S1N0 (S1-60 × 40 cm, N0-Control) | 36.00 | 6.70 | 10.57 | 11.30 | 43.00 | 7.33 | 23.20 | 0.66 | 7.33 |
S1N1 (S1-60 × 40 cm, N1-200 kg/ha) | 37.67 | 8.68 | 12.93 | 12.50 | 50.67 | 9.47 | 27.27 | 0.89 | 9.67 |
S1N2 (S1-60 × 40 cm, N2-150 kg/ha) | 40.00 | 7.83 | 11.87 | 13.37 | 52.33 | 9.27 | 27.20 | 0.92 | 10.33 |
S1N3 (S1-60 × 40 cm, N3-100 kg/ha) | 37.00 | 7.80 | 10.43 | 11.50 | 45.67 | 8.93 | 23.47 | 0.84 | 8.33 |
S2N0 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N0-Control) | 38.67 | 7.77 | 12.87 | 13.73 | 49.00 | 9.57 | 24.77 | 1.01 | 10.00 |
S2N1 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N1-200 kg/ha) | 39.33 | 8.70 | 14.20 | 16.77 | 54.00 | 10.43 | 29.60 | 1.35 | 11.00 |
S2N2 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N2-150 kg/ha) | 44.00 | 9.27 | 15.20 | 17.93 | 55.00 | 10.83 | 31.23 | 1.56 | 12.33 |
S2N3 (S2-40 × 30 cm, N3-100 kg/ha) | 39.00 | 7.90 | 13.83 | 15.40 | 53.67 | 10.13 | 27.07 | 1.24 | 11.00 |
Sem (±) | 0.97 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.93 | 0.19 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 0.50 |
CD at 5% | 3.15 | 1.37 | 1.57 | 0.83 | 2.92 | 0.72 | NS | 0.14 | NS |
Acharya, M. M. and Dashora, L. K. (2004). Response of graded levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on vegetative growth and flowering in African marigold (Tageteserecta Linn.). Journal of Ornamental Horticulture New Series, 7(2), 179-183.
Barman, D. and Pal, P. (1999). Effect of nitrogen and spacing on growth and flowering of chrysanthemum (chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.) cv. Chandram. Horticulture Journal, 12(1), 51-59
Belorkar, P. V., Golliwar, V. J. and Kothare, A. J. (1992). Effect of nitrogen and spacing on growth flowering and yield of African marigold (Tagetserecta). Journal of Soil and Crops, 2(1), 62-64
Birade, R. M., Ranpise, S. A., Patil, B. T. and Ghure, T. K. (2003). Effect of NPK and spacings on growth, quality and flower production in China aster (Callistephus chinensis L.). Advances in Horticulture and Forestry, 9, 243-249.
Chauhan, P., Vidhya, S. M. and Rathor, V. (2014). Effect of NPK on Physico- Chemical Parameters of gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.) cv. White Prosperity. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(1), 241-362.
Dhemre, J. K., Sirsath, N. S. and Naphade, A. S. (1997). Effect of different plant densities and seasons on flowering of china aster. Journal of soils and crops, 7(2), 136-138.
Dixit, A. (2004). Effect of plant spacing and nitrogen on growth, flowering and yield of annual chrysanthemum cv. ‘Local White’. Orissa Journal of Horticulture, 32(2), 55-56.
Jamkhande, M., Paithankar, D. H., Warade, A. D., Mohariya, A. and Ambare, T. P. (2004). Effect of graded levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and flower production of China aster cv. ‘Local’. Advances in Plant Sciences, 17(1), 163- 165.
Jonick, J. and Durkin, D. (1968). Effect of nitrogen and spacing on the growth and flowering responses of (chrysanthemum morifolium) proceeding of American society of Horticulture Sciences, 80, 571-580.
Karavadia, B. N. and Dhaduk, B. K. (2002). Effect of spacing and nitrogen on annual chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum coronarium) cv. ‘Local White’. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture New Series, 5(1), 65-66.
Khobragade, R. K., Bisen, S. and Thakur, R. S. (2012). Effect of planting distance and pinching on growth, flowering and yield of China aster (Callistephus chinensis) cv. Poornima Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(4), 146.
Koley, S. and Khan, S. (2012). Effect of mustard oil cake and urea as nitrogen sources on vegetative and reproductive attributes of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. ‘Seracole’. Journal of Interacademicia 16(4), 826-829.
Kumar, P., Padmalatha, T. and Pratap, M. (2014). Effect of spacing and pinching on vegetative growth in china aster (Callistephus Chinensis L. Nees) Cv. Kamini. Plant Archives, 10(8), 0972-5210.
Maharnor, S. I., Chopde, N., Thakre, S. and Raut, P. D. (2011). Effect of nitrogen and pinching on growth and yield of African marigold The Asian Journal of Horticulture, 12(1), 43-45.
Mishra, S. K., Kumar, M., Kasera, S., Mishra, S. K. and Singh, A. K. (2018). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on plant growth, yield and flower quality of china aster under allahabad agro-climatic condition Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 64(6), 343-348.
Pandey, N., Singh, J. and Sahu, A. (2024). Impact of Bio-fertilizers and Inorganic Manures on Flower Yield Attributes of China Aster (Callistephus chinensis L. Nees) cv. Kamini. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology, 27(12), 917-922.
Rajan, K., Bhatt, D. S. and Chawla, S. L. (2019). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorous on growth, flowering and yield of cut chrysanthemum cv. Thai Chen Queen. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 3, 337-342.
Rajesh, K. K., Sharad, B. and Singh, R. (2012). Effect of Planting distance and pinching on growth, flowering and yield of china aster cv. Poornima. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 82(4), 334.
Sandhu, S., Parmar, S., Saurabh, A., Ahir, M. and Kamboj (2024). A. Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management in China Aster cv. Arka Poornima Under Mid Hills of Himalayas. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 46(7), 1100-1105.
Shah, Y., Khan, A. and Nanda, R. A. (2005). Effect of nitrogen and spacing on growth and flowering in china aster. Progressive Horticulture, 37(2), 453-455.
Singh, K. P. and Sangma (2001). Response of china aster to spacing. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture 4(1), 61-68.
Singh, M., Sharma, B. P. and Gupta, Y. C. (2018). Flower production and cost:benefit analysis of china aster under different combinations of chemical and bio-fertilizers. Advances in Floriculture and Urban Horticulture
Sunita, H. M., Ravi, H., Bablad, H. B. (2007). Effect of plant spacing and integrated nutrient management on yield and quality of seed and vegetative growth parameters in Afican marigold cv. Orange double Journal of ornamental horticulture, 10(4), 245-249.
Varma, A., Thumar, B. V., Dobariya, K. and Parasana, J. S. (2023). Different NPK levels and their impacts on flowering and yield in gomphrena (Gomphrena globosa L.) and soil nutrient status. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12(7), 503-509.
Vijayakumar, K. T., Patil, A. A. and Hulmani, N. C. (1988). Effect of plant density and nitrogen on growth characters and flower yield of china aster cv. Ostrich plume mixed south. Indian Horticulture, 36(6), 218-320
Swagat Ranjan Mund, Sukirti Mohanty, Subhendu Jena and Debi Archana Nayak (2025). Effect of Nitrogen and Spacing on Growth and Yield of China Aster (Callistephus chinensis L. Nees.) cv. Powder Puff Mix. Biological Forum, 17(6): 09-13.