Author:
Priyanka Rani1, D.K. Singh2, Gulab Chandra3, R.P. Diwakar4*, Ajit Kumar5, Amit Kumar6 and Pratyush Kumar7
Journal Name: Biological Forum, 18(2): 25-30, 2026
Address:
(Corresponding author: R.P. Diwakar*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2026.18.2.4
Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) are commonly reared in barren housing systems that may increase stress, aggression, injuries, and mortality, thereby compromising welfare and productivity. Although environmental enrichment has improved welfare in other poultry species, information on effective enrichment strategies for Japanese quail remains limited. This study evaluated the effects of environmental enrichment on welfare-related parameters in Japanese quail at 24 weeks of age. A total of 160 quail were randomly assigned to four groups: control (no enrichment), sand bath (T1), wooden perches (T2), and sand bath plus perches (T3). Feather condition and body condition parameters (wound score, bumble foot, footpad lesions, and claw length) were assessed. Overall feather score differed significantly (P<0.05), with sand-bath birds showing the highest scores, indicating improved plumage condition. Feather scores for individual body regions and body condition traits did not differ significantly among treatments, although more wounds were observed in control and perch-only groups. The results indicate that sand bath enrichment improves feather condition in Japanese quail and can be recommended as a practical welfare-enhancing strategy in quail production systems.
Japanese quail, environment, production, scores.
Poultry farming occupies a pivotal position among livestock-based vocations due to its enormous potential for rapid economic growth, particularly benefiting weaker sections of society. Over the past few decades, the poultry sector has transformed from a backyard venture into a dynamic agro-industry. Globally, approximately 20 wild and 70 domestic quail strains have been reported (Chang et al., 2005), among which Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) is the most popular due to its high efficiency in egg and meat production (Chang et al., 2005; Lukanov, 2019). Quail production serves as an important supplement to chicken and duck production, meeting the increasing demand for poultry products. Quail eggs contribute about 10% of the global table egg market (Lukanov, 2019). In India, quail population constitutes about 0.91% of the total poultry population, while the poultry sector contributes 0.57% to the national GDP and approximately 16% to the livestock GDP, with a poultry population of 851.81 million showing a growth of 16.80% compared to the previous livestock census (Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics, 2019).
The ability of animals to express their natural behavioural repertoire is now widely recognized as a key component of animal welfare. When the housing environment fails to meet these behavioural requirements, poultry may develop behavioural and physical welfare issues (Bracke and Hopster 2006; Buller et al., 2020; Dawkins, 2023). Environmental enrichment (EE) involves modifying the birds' environment to promote natural behaviours, reduce stress, and improve overall welfare (Newberry, 1995; Laurence et al., 2015). In poultry, feather condition and body condition are widely recognized as key indicators of welfare, reflecting health status, housing adequacy, and the ability to express natural behaviours (Broom, 1986). Feather scoring assesses plumage integrity, which may be affected by stress, feather pecking, and aggression, whereas body condition parameters such as wounds, footpad lesions, and claw length provide insight into housing design, bird activity, and social interactions. Poor feather or body condition not only indicates compromised welfare but also negatively affects thermoregulation, feed efficiency, and productivity.
Structural enrichments such as perches and dust-bathing substrates have been shown to encourage natural behaviours, reduce stress, and improve physical condition in poultry (Appleby, 1998; Olsson and Keeling 2005). Environmental enrichment reduces feather pecking, aggression, and fear-related behaviours, thereby enhancing feather and body integrity and overall performance (Jones, 2002; Dixon et al., 2010; Hartcher et al., 2015). Perching is an innate behaviour that, when supported by proper perch design, minimizes footpad and leg problems, while dust bathing maintains feather quality, regulates lipid levels, and controls ectoparasites (Shields et al., 2005). In Japanese quail, environmental enrichment has been reported to alleviate stress, improve behavioural welfare, and promote better physical condition (Laurence et al., 2015).
Although environmental enrichment has been widely studied in chickens and other poultry species, limited information is available regarding its effects on Japanese quail under intensive rearing systems. Most previous studies have focused on production performance and egg quality, with comparatively fewer investigations addressing behavioural welfare indicators, physiological stress markers, immune responses, and health-related parameters simultaneously. Moreover, comparative evaluations of different enrichment materials under controlled experimental conditions are scarce. Therefore, there is a need for comprehensive studies assessing the integrated impact of environmental enrichment strategies on behavioural, physiological, and health welfare parameters in Japanese quail. Assessing feather and body condition scores provides a practical and reliable approach to evaluate the effectiveness of enrichment interventions. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to investigate the effects of perches and sand baths on feather and body condition parameters in Japanese quail, with the aim of developing management strategies to enhance quail health, productivity, and overall well-being.
Entire length of the experiment was 19 weeks. In this experiment five-week-old 160 female grower Japanese quail were purchased and reared for subsequent enrichment trial .The four groups, which comprised of four replicates and 10 quails in each. Groups were named as Control, T1, T2 and T3. T1 group (sand enriched) birds in this group were provided with plastic circular tubs featuring an open surface area of 2826 cm² and a depth of 16 cm. The tubs were filled with premium play sand (sharp sand) to a depth of 12 cm. To ensure an adequate amount of sand for dust bathing, the sand was replenished daily, T2 group (wooden perch enriched), this group was supplied with mobile, inverted "U"-shaped wooden perches. Each perch had a ground clearance of 30 cm and measured 80 cm in length. Wooden sticks with dimensions of 80 × 2 × 2 cm (length × width × height) were used for the construction, T3 group (combination of sand dust and wooden perch), birds in this group had access to both sand dust and wooden perches for enrichment and control group.
The experiment commenced after a seven-day acclimatization period during which the birds were allowed to adapt to their new environment. All the Japanese quail birds were reared under similar managerial and hygienic conditions in a deep litter system of rearing with well-ventilated pens. The floor was thoroughly cleaned, disinfected, and dried before spreading the dry rice husk as bedding material. The rice husk was evenly spread in 6-8 cm thickness. Florescent tube lights (38 watts each) were fitted at appropriate heights to provide uniform lighting. A photo-scheduled program (16 hours light and 8 hours dark) was used throughout the experiment.
The Japanese quails in the various treatment groups were given free access to fresh and clean water. Basal diets were offered ad libitum, twice daily. Japanese quails were fed on a basal commercial diet from the start of the experiment until the end based on the requirements of Japanese quails outlined in NRC (1994).
At the age of 24 weeks, 20 Japanese quails were randomly selected from each treatment and examined for feather and body scores by the scoring system (Tauson et al., 2005) assigned scores to the feather condition, body wounds, and bumble foot, while (Ekstrand et al., 1998) assigned scores to the footpad lesions. A measuring tape was used to measure the length of the claws on each foot's four toes. The mean claw length was determined by averaging the eight claw length measurements per hen (Hester et al., 2013).
Table 1: Estimation of feather score.
Score | Feather loss/ plumage damage at different body regions. (head, neck, breast, back, wings and tail) |
1 | No feathers |
2 | Half feathers 2/3 loss |
3 | 1/3 feather loss |
4 | Full feather coverage |
Table 2: Estimation of body score.
Score | Body wound | Bumble foot | Footpad lesions |
1 | Severe damage | Severe damage | Severe hyperkeratosis |
2 | Mild damage | Mild damage | Mild hyperkeratosis |
3 | No lesions on the body | No lesions on the body | Normal feet |
A. Environmental enrichment effect on Feather score of Japanese quail
Table 3 exemplify the mean feather score values for control, T1, T2 and T3 groups, which were 3.75, 3.88, 3.72, and 3.80, respectively. These values were statistically significant (P<0.05) with T1 group that recorded highest mean feather score. However, mean values for the individual parameters-neck, breast, vent, back, wings and tail were statistically insignificant.
B. Environmental enrichment effect on body score of Japanese quail
Table 4 stand for scored values for wound, bumble foot, foot pad lesion and claw length. Wound scores for various groups such as control, T1, T2 and T3 were 2.69, 2.94, 2.69 and 2.88 and were statistically insignificant. The control and T2 (enriched with perch) group had more wounds. Bumblefoot and Footpad scores did not vary among the groups. Claw length scores for control, T1, T2 and T3 were 16.90, 16.83, 16.96 and 16.91 mm and were statistically insignificant.
Table 3: Environmental enrichment effect on feather score of Japanese quail.
Feather score parameters | Group | SEM | P Value | |||
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
Neck | 3.81 | 3.94 | 3.75 | 3.94 | 0.08 | 0.335 |
Breast | 3.81 | 3.88 | 3.94 | 3.75 | 0.09 | 0.516 |
Vent | 3.69 | 3.94 | 3.69 | 3.63 | 0.11 | 0.200 |
Back | 3.75 | 3.81 | 3.50 | 3.81 | 0.11 | 0.159 |
Wings | 3.75 | 3.81 | 3.75 | 3.75 | 0.11 | 0.970 |
Tail | 3.69 | 3.88 | 3.69 | 3.94 | 0.10 | 0.184 |
Mean | 3.75ab | 3.88b | 3.72a | 3.80ab | 0.10 | 0.046 |
T1 (sand bath); T2 (perch); T3(sand bath + perch)
abcMeans bearing different superscripts in a row differ significantly at (P<0.05)
Fig. 1. Bars represent feather score at corresponding groups, along mean values.
Table 4: Environmental enrichment effect on body score of Japanese quail.
Variable | Week | Group | SEM | P Value | |||
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | ||||
Body score | Wound | 2.69 | 2.94 | 2.69 | 2.88 | 0.10 | 0.184 |
Bumblefoot | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | — | |
Footpad lesions | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | — | |
Claw length(mm) | 16.90 | 16.83 | 16.96 | 16.91 | 0.27 | 0.990 | |
Fig. 2. Bars represent body score at corresponding groups, along with mean.
Fig. 3. Bars represent claw length of groups, along with mean of Japanese quail.
T1 (sand bath); T2 (perch); T3(sand bath + perch).
DISCUSSION
The present study demonstrated that environmental enrichment significantly influenced the overall feather condition of Japanese quail. The mean feather scores were higher in the enriched groups, particularly in the sand bath group (T1), which recorded the highest feather score (3.88) compared to the control and other treatments. Although individual feather regions (neck, breast, vent, back, wings, and tail) did not show significant differences among treatments, the improvement in overall plumage condition suggests that enrichment reduced stress-related behaviours such as feather pecking and aggression. Feather condition is widely regarded as an important indicator of bird health and welfare, and improved feather scores reflect better physical and psychological well-being.
The findings of the present study are consistent with previous reports. Campo et al. (2008) observed improved feather condition in hens housed in enriched environments containing dust baths, perches, and foraging materials, attributing this improvement to reduced stress and increased opportunities for natural behaviours such as dust bathing and preening. Similarly, Tahamtani et al. (2016) reported enhanced feather scores in laying hens exposed to environmental complexity, likely due to stress reduction and improved behavioural expression. Mathkari (2022) also reported the positive influence of environmental enrichment on feather quality. Previous studies by Dixon et al. (2010); Hartcher et al. (2015) further support the beneficial role of enrichment in improving feather integrity. However, Rodenburg et al. (2013) highlighted that the effects of enrichment on feather condition are more extensively documented in laying hens than in broilers, indicating the need for species-specific studies such as the present investigation in Japanese quail. Toghyani et al. (2010) noted that bedding type affected locomotion, whereas the present results differed from Shields et al. (2005), who reported higher activity levels on sand bedding.
In contrast, body condition parameters, including wound incidence, bumble foot, footpad lesions, and claw length, did not differ significantly among the treatment groups. Although the control and perch-only groups exhibited a higher incidence of wounds, the differences were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that environmental enrichment primarily improved behavioural welfare and plumage condition rather than gross physical condition traits under the present experimental conditions. The absence of significant differences in footpad lesions, bumble foot, and claw length may be attributed to the relatively short experimental duration, housing design, or low severity of floor-related challenges.
Comparable results have been reported by Campo et al. (2008), who found improved body condition in enriched housing systems due to reduced stress and enhanced behavioural opportunities. Tahamtani et al. (2016) also reported improved body condition in hens exposed to enriched environments, while Dixon et al. (2010) observed that opportunities for natural behaviours such as perching and dust bathing positively influenced bird physical health. Rodenburg et al. (2013) discussed differential responses in body condition traits between layers and broilers, suggesting that enrichment effects may vary depending on species and production systems.
Overall, the present findings indicate that environmental enrichment, particularly sand bath provision, is effective in improving feather condition and behavioural welfare in Japanese quail, while its influence on body condition traits was limited. These results highlight the importance of enrichment strategies in quail housing systems and support their adoption to enhance bird welfare and management outcomes.
The present study demonstrated that environmental enrichment, particularly the provision of sand baths and perches, positively influenced the overall feather condition of Japanese quail, with the sand bath group showing the highest mean feather score. Although feather scores for individual body regions did not differ significantly among treatments, the improvement in overall plumage suggests that enrichment can mitigate stress-related behaviours such as feather pecking. Body condition parameters, including wound incidence, bumble foot, footpad lesions, and claw length, were not significantly affected by enrichment, indicating that these interventions primarily improved behavioural welfare and plumage quality rather than gross physical condition. Overall, the findings highlight the potential of perches and sand baths as simple, practical, and cost-effective welfare-enhancing strategies for quail production systems. Their adoption is recommended in both intensive and small-scale quail farming to improve bird welfare and management outcomes.
Further research is required to elucidate the molecular and physiological pathways responsible for the observed improvements in welfare, including the role of stress-related gene expression, immune regulation, and neuroendocrine responses. The interactions between environmental enrichment and other management factors such as stocking density, dietary strategies, and lighting programs should also be investigated to develop comprehensive welfare-oriented production systems.
Moreover, comparative studies across different quail strains, age groups, and housing systems (cage versus floor rearing) would be valuable in establishing species- and system-specific enrichment recommendations. Future investigations should also aim to develop standardized enrichment protocols and validated welfare assessment tools specifically tailored for Japanese quail production.
Appleby, M. C. (1998). Modification of laying hen cages to improve behavior. Poultry Science, 77(12), 1828-1832.
BAHS, G. (2019). Basic animal husbandry statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries, Government of India.
Bracke, M. B. & Hopster, H. (2006). Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics, 19(1), 77-89.
Broom, D. M. (1986). Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal, 142(6), 524-526.
Buller, H., Blokhuis, H., Lokhorst, K., Silberberg, M. & Veissier, I. (2020). Animal welfare management in a digital world. Animals, 10(10), 1779.
Campo, J. L., Prieto, M. T. & Davila, S. G. (2008). Effects of housing system and cold stress on heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, fluctuating asymmetry, and tonic immobility duration of chickens. Poultry Science, 87(4), 621-626.
Chang, G. B., Chang, H., Liu, X. P., Xu, W., Wang, H. Y., Zhao, W. M. & Olowofeso, O. (2005). Developmental research on the origin and phylogeny of quails. World's Poultry Science Journal, 61(1), 105-112.
Dawkins, M. S. (2023). Natural behaviour is not enough: Farm animal welfare needs modern answers to Tinbergen’s Four Questions. Animals, 13(6), 988.
Dixon, L. M., Duncan, I. J. H. & Mason, G. J. (2010). The effects of four types of enrichment on feather-pecking behaviour in laying hens housed in barren environments. Animal Welfare, 19(4), 429-435.
Ekstrand, C., Carpenter, T. E., Andersson, I. & Algers, B. (1998). Prevalence and control of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers in Sweden. British Poultry Science, 39(3), 318-324.
Hartcher, K. M., Tran, K. T. N., Wilkinson, S. J., Hemsworth, P. H., Thomson, P. C. & Cronin, G. M. (2015). The effects of environmental enrichment and beak-trimming during the rearing period on subsequent feather damage due to feather-pecking in laying hens. Poultry Science, 94(5), 852-859.
Hester, P. Y., Enneking, S. A., Jefferson-Moore, K. Y., Einstein, M. E., Cheng, H. W. & Rubin, D. A. (2013). The effect of perches in cages during pullet rearing and egg laying on hen performance, foot health, and plumage.
Laurence, A., Houdelier, C., Calandreau, L., Arnould, C., Favreau-Peigné, A., Leterrier, C. & Lumineau, S. (2015). Environmental enrichment reduces behavioural alterations induced by chronic stress in Japanese quail. Animal, 9(2), 331-338.
Lukanov, H. (2019). Domestic quail (Coturnix japonica domestica), is there such farm animal ? World's Poultry Science Journal, 75(4), 547-558.
Mathkari, C. V. (2022). Effects of Environmental enrichments on well-being measures in colony-caged Japanese quail (Coturnix Japonica) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park).
Newberry, R. C. (1995). Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 44(2-4), 229-243.
Olsson, I. A. S. & Keeling, L. J. (2005). Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 93(3-4), 259-282.
Rodenburg, T. B., Van Krimpen, M. M., De Jong, I. C., De Haas, E. N., Kops, M. S., Riedstra, B. J. & Nicol, C. J. (2013). The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World's Poultry Science Journal, 69(2), 361-374.
Shields, S. J., Garner, J. P., & Mench, J. A. (2005). Effect of sand and wood-shavings bedding on the behavior of broiler chickens. Poultry science, 84(12), 1816-1824.
Tahamtani, F. M., Brantsæter, M., Nordgreen, J., Sandberg, E., Hansen, T. B., Nødtvedt, A. & Janczak, A. M. (2016). Effects of litter provision during early rearing and environmental enrichment during the production phase on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens. Poultry Science, 95(12), 2747-2756.
Tauson, R., Kjaer, J., Maria, G. A., Cepero, R. & Holm, K. E. (2005). Applied scoring of integument and health in laying hens. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep, 23(Suppl 1), 153-159.
Toghyani, M., Gheisari, A., Modaresi, M., Tabeidian, S. A. & Toghyani, M. (2010). Effect of different litter material on performance and behavior of broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 122(1), 48-52.
Priyanka Rani, D.K. Singh, Gulab Chandra, R.P. Diwakar, Ajit Kumar, Amit Kumar and Pratyush Kumar (2026). Environmental Enrichment Strategies and their Effects on Welfare Parameters in Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Biological Forum, 18(2): 25-30.