Evaluation of Antioxidants in Different Mustard Cultivars Against Alternaria Blight

Author: M. Divya1*, Srikanta Das2  and Sunita Mahapatra2

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(6): 135-142, 2024

Address:

1Agricutural Research Station, Vizianagaram (Andhra Pradesh), India.

2Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia (West Bengal), India.

 (Corresponding author: M. Divya*)

DOI: -

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

The present study reports the variable antioxidant profile resulting from inducers/elicitors on mustard varieties against Alternaria brassicicola. An experiment was conducted with four inducers/elicitors viz., Benzothiadiazole (BTH), Hydrogen peroxide, Jasmonic Acid and Salicylic acid at three different concentrations to evaluate their effect against Alternaria leaf blight of mustard in four varieties viz., TBM-204, Bullet, B-54 and B-9. The pathogen A. brassicicola was inoculated at 15 DAS. An attempt was made to study the underline biochemical changes which may have their influence on induced resistance. The component of first line defense mechanism, catalase (CAT) and non-enzymatic antioxidants like ascorbic acid were found to be more prevalent in the plants treated with BTH followed by Jasmonic acid, Salicylic acid and Hydrogen peroxide. Among the varieties tested, these enzymes were more prevalent in TBM-204 and Bullet and less prevalent in B-54 and B-9.


Keywords

Mustard, Alternaria, catalase, ascorbic acid.


Introduction

Brassica juncea, commonly known as Indian mustard, is a major cultivated brassica crop in north-west India, followed by limited cultivation of B. napus and B. rapa for vegetable oil production. Among oilseed crops, rapeseed mustard (B. juncea) occupies an important position globally in terms of production and consumption. India is the fourth largest producer of oilseeds in the world and stands second in Asia. Whereas, West Bengal stands fifth position in which area and production is 0.6 M ha and 0.7M t, respectively, with an average productivity of 1212 kg ha-1 (Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, 2019). It is generally used as a vegetable, and grown mostly for seeds, which yield essential oil and condiment. Although, India is one of the leading oilseed producing countries of the world, it still not able to meet the requirement for its vast population. To meet the growing demand and make India self-sufficient for edible oils, productivity of the oilseed crops should be increased since the possibility of increasing land under oilseed crops is very limited (Economic survey, 2020-21). The development of high yielding varieties along with the new improved production technology leads to increase in production and productivity of mustard but the gap between potential yield and actual yields are broaden due to the different biotic and abiotic factors. Among them, fungal diseases of oilseed   Brassica are prevalent in India. The severe attack of these diseases deteriorates the quality and quantity of the seed and oil content. Among the diseases, Alternaria blight caused by Alternaria brassicicola (Berk.) Sacc. is the major constraint in production and destructive lethal disease of rapeseed mustard, reported from all the continents of the world causing 47% yield losses (Kolte, 1986) that may range up to 15-71% in productivity and 14.6-36 % in oil content (Meena et al., 2010). Apart from indiscriminate use of the pesticides, there is a need to develop strategies providing durable resistance, giving protection for a long time over a broad geographical area. Among such strategies, systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is an example of a defense mechanism offering long lasting disease resistance against a broad spectrum of pathogens and is promising for sustainable crop production in the future (Song and Goodman 2001). Therefore, the following study was conducted against Alternaria blight of mustard by using inducers.

Material & Methods

A. Isolation and purification of A. brassicicola

Different infected plant parts, viz., leaves, pods and stems of infected mustard plants were collected in paper bags and brought to the laboratory for isolation of pathogen. The diseased portion of infected plant parts along with healthy portion were cut into bits of 8–10 mm, and surface sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution for 30 sec, washed thrice with sterilized distilled water and were blot dried. Thereafter three-four bits were placed in each petriplate containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium. The inoculated plates were incubated in BOD incubator at 22 ± 2°C and monitored at regular intervals and initial growth of the pathogen was sub-cultured into agar slants.

Pure culture of Alternaria was obtained by single spore isolation method. The spore suspension was prepared by scraping the surface of sporulating cultures and was added to lukewarm molten water agar and dispensed into sterilized petri plates. The petri plates were gently swirled for even distribution of the spores and kept for incubation at 25 ± 2°C for 12 h. Individual germinated spore, spaced out clearly was located on inverted water agar plates and marked with a glass marking pencil on the outside of the bottom dish using a compound microscope. Each marked spore was aseptically transferred into separate PDA slants. The culture was maintained and sub-cultured for further studies.  

B. Preparation of inoculum spray

Four mustard varieties, viz., TBM-204, Bullet, B-54and B-9 were collected from university instructional farm. The plantsof these varieties were raised in plastic pots (13 cm × 13 cm) containing 3 kg soil (sandyloam soil: FYM 3:1 w/w) in the net house, Department of Plant Pathology. For inoculation, A. brassicicola conidial suspension was prepared from nine-day old cultures by flooding the surface of the Petriplates with sterile distilled water and scraping the surface gently with a glass rod. The suspension was filtered through two layers of cheese cloth to eliminate mycelial fragments. Inoculum consisted of a conidial suspension adjusted to 1 ×104 conidia ml-1 using a haemocytometer. The plants were sprayed with freshly prepared conidial suspension using an atomizer at 15 DAS (Vishunavat and Kolte 2008).

C. Standardization of inducer concentrations

Benzothiadiazole (BTH) [S-methylbenzo-1, 2, 3-thiadiazole-7-carbothiate], hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), Jasmonic Acid (JA) and Salicylic Acid (SA) were used for seed treatment as inducers. Concentrations of these inducers were categorized as three levels viz., low, medium and high concentrations and standardized as BTH @ 0.25 mM, 0.75 mM, 1.5 mM, H2O2@ 1%, 2%, 3%, JA @ 1 mM, 2.5 mM, 4 mM and SA @ 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 2 mM.

Seed treatment was given by the standardize inducers for 1 h before sowing. For control treatment, seeds were soaked in sterilized distilled water. Spore suspension of the isolated pathogen was artificially inoculated at 15 DAS in three replications. The plants were covered with moist chamber consisting of transparent polythene sheet so that plant could maintain photosynthesis ability. After five days of inoculation, Alternaria blight incidence was visualized on leaves. The leaf samples were collected for three times at 15 DAS and 20 DAS (both uninoculated and inoculated samples) for biochemical analysis and are stored at   -20°C.

Biochemical analysis. Leaf samples of different mustard genotypes were analyzed for enzymatic antioxidant (Catalase) and non-enzymatic antioxidant (Ascorbic acid). For assay of catalase activity, fresh leaf sample (0.3 g) was extracted with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVP) and Triton X. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min and supernatant was collected for enzyme assay. Catalase activity was determined by monitoring the disappearance of H2O2 at 240 nm (ε = 40 Mm-1 cm-1) (Aebi, 1984). The assay was performed using 2.8 ml of 100 mM phosphate buffer, 0.1 ml of H2O2 (1%) and 0.1 ml of plant extract. The molar extinction coefficient of hydrogen peroxide at 240 nm was taken as 0.04 sq. cm/μ mole. Enzyme activity was expressed as μ moles of hydrogen peroxide degraded/min/mg of protein. 

Ascorbic acid content was measured by using modified method of Davies and Masten (1991). Leaf samples were extracted using 4% of oxalic acid, using chilled mortar and pestle. Then homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4°C for 30 min. One ml of supernatant was added with 2 ml of 1.72 mM 2, 6-dichlorophenolindophenol (2, 6-DCPIP) dye indicator in 3 ml cuvette and was measured at 518 nm immediately after mixing. Content of ascorbic acid was expressed as the mg of ascorbic acid per 100 grams of fresh sample.

Statistical analysis of data was performed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using OP STAT software.


Results & Discussion

In order to assess the effect of inducers on biochemical responses, four different mustard varieties (TBM-204, Bullet, B-54 and B-9) were investigated against Alternaria blight infection.

Catalase: Study on catalase (CAT), indicated that the activity was significantly decreased in all the varieties with regard to inducers and biotic stress in comparison to control. All the treatments in all the four varieties tested were depicting decreasing trend to overcome the infection of the pathogen. 

Inducers tested at all concentrations significantly increased the amount of catalase compared to control in all the varieties. Significantly high catalase activity was found in BTH followed by JA, SA and least activity was found in H2O2. With the increase in concentration the catalase activity and the percent increase over control was also increased (Tables 1-4).

Interaction between inducers and varieties revealed that Catalase activity was observed to be lesser in infected leaves as compared to the healthy one and the varieties B-54 and B-9 expressed less catalase activity than the varieties TBM-204 and Bullet which can consider having low resistance against Alternaria blight (Table 5, Fig. 1).

Above findings are strongly supported by the report of Subhani et al. (2018). The decline in catalase activity is regarded as a general response to many stresses (Jung, 2004; Pan  et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2008). The reduction of CAT activity is due to the inhibition of enzyme synthesis or change in the assembly of enzyme subunits under stress conditions. Decrease in catalase activity was also an indication of scavenging the hydrogen peroxide activity after infection.

Result indicate that the high levels of catalase played an important role in reducing damage caused by pathogen by dismutating O2• − and catalyzing H2O2 in TBM-204 and Bullet. However, in B-54 and B-9 varieties an uncontrollable production of reactive oxygen species may couple with lesser activity of catalase created the oxidative stress, and led to the membrane damage and finally appeared as a symptom in plant. 

Ascorbic acid: Study on non-enzymatic antioxidant revealed that the level of ascorbate was gradually increased significantly over their respective untreated controls with the increasing stress period in all the varieties tested.

In variety TBM-204, ascorbic acid content at 15 DAS was ranged from 34.95 – 83.25 mg/100 g FW while it was 35.54 - 119.61 and 39.85 - 125.54mg/100 g FW at 20 DAS and 5 DAI respectively (Table 6). In variety Bullet, ascorbic acid content at 15 DAS was ranged from 30.40 - 42.22mg/100 g FW while it was 31.31 - 63.84 and 33.84 - 94.95mg/100 g FW at 20 DAS and 5 DAI respectively (Table 7). In variety B-54, ascorbic acid content was ranged from 27.83 - 39.08, 30.40 - 43.84 and 31.23 - 84.67mg/100 g FW at 15 DAS, 20 DAS and 5 DAI respectively (Table 8). And it was 16.40 - 22.19, 22.70 – 35.54 and 24.67 – 72.10 at 15 DAS, 20 DAS and 5 DAI respectively (Table 9) in variety B-9. In the present study, varieties TBM-204 and Bullet in which maximum ascorbic acid (125.54 and 94.95 mg/100 g FW) under Alternaria blight infection were expected to have highest resistance, while varieties B-54 and B-9which possessed comparatively low ascorbic acid (84.67 and 72.10 mg/100 g FW) were considered to have low resistance against Alternaria blight (Table 10, Fig. 2).

Among the four inducers tested, BTH at high concentration showed high amount of ascorbic acid followed by medium and low. Later jasmonic acid showed significant high levels of ascorbate followed by salicylic acid and H2O2 in all the days of sampling.

Table 1: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the Catalase activity (μmol of H2O2/min/mg of protein) in the mustard (TBM-204) against A. brassicicola.

Sr. No.

Treatments

15 DAS

% increase over control

20 DAS

% increase over control

5 DAI

% increase over control

T1

BTH - L

3.014

16.670

3.374

17.311

2.912

16.994

T2

BTH - M

3.166

20.673

3.430

18.663

3.101

22.047

T3

BTH - H

3.403

26.200

4.101

31.967

3.586

32.592

T4

H2O2 - L

2.688

6.578

2.816

0.900

2.563

5.672

T5

H2O2 - M

2.698

6.936

2.824

1.203

2.580

6.306

T6

H2O2 - H

2.718

7.603

2.843

1.848

2.584

6.425

T7

JA - L

2.788

9.923

3.124

10.687

2.686

9.990

T8

JA - M

2.791

10.030

3.139

11.113

2.981

18.902

T9

JA - H

2.832

11.335

3.342

16.521

2.707

10.704

T10

SA - L

2.741

8.383

2.982

6.431

2.634

8.221

T11

SA - M

2.753

8.767

3.071

9.140

2.661

9.140

T12

SA - H

2.765

9.194

3.091

9.742

2.634

8.231

T13

Control

2.511


2.790


2.418



SEm±

0.130


0.161


0.147



CD (P≤0.05)

0.377


0.469


0.428



CV %

7.913


8.875


9.205


DAS: Days after sowing; DAI: Days after pathogen inoculation; L: Low; M: Medium; H: High

Table 2: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the Catalase activity (μmol of H2O2/min/mg of protein) in the mustard (Bullet) against A. brassicicola.

Sr. No.

Treatments

15 DAS

% increase over control

20 DAS

% increase over control

5 DAI

% increase over control

T1

BTH - L

2.607

19.189

2.893

15.120

2.706

11.970

T2

BTH - M

2.898

27.289

2.924

16.011

2.711

12.144

T3

BTH - H

2.943

28.416

3.927

37.472

2.711

12.143

T4

H2O2 - L

2.149

1.936

2.720

9.712

2.399

0.708

T5

H2O2 - M

2.220

5.082

2.749

10.692

2.462

3.271

T6

H2O2 - H

2.186

3.633

2.831

13.257

2.500

4.733

T7

JA - L

2.310

8.775

2.887

14.956

2.576

7.555

T8

JA - M

2.372

11.159

2.907

15.540

2.696

11.644

T9

JA - H

2.565

17.864

2.912

15.690

2.584

7.843

T10

SA - L

2.299

8.350

2.832

13.307

2.524

5.625

T11

SA - M

2.202

4.334

2.845

13.692

2.544

6.394

T12

SA - H

2.304

8.551

2.903

15.414

2.549

6.554

T13

Control

2.107


2.455


2.382



SEm±

0.104


0.147


0.070



CD (P≤0.05)

0.303


0.427


0.204



CV %

7.524


8.761


4.740


DAS: Days after sowing; DAI: Days after pathogen inoculation; L: Low; M: Medium; H: High



Table 3: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the Catalase activity (μmol of H2O2/min/mg of protein) in the mustard (B-54) against A. brassicicola.

Sr. No.

Treatments

15 DAS

% increase over control

20 DAS

% increase over control

5 DAI

% increase over control

T1

BTH - L

2.071

20.859

2.629

19.019

2.612

54.900

T2

BTH - M

2.556

35.876

2.707

21.352

2.656

55.648

T3

BTH - H

2.666

38.522

2.837

24.956

2.666

55.814

T4

H2O2 - L

1.774

7.610

2.183

2.474

1.681

29.923

T5

H2O2 - M

2.071

20.859

2.152

1.069

1.741

32.338

T6

H2O2 - H

2.152

23.838

2.225

4.315

1.803

34.664

T7

JA - L

1.853

11.549

2.383

10.659

1.911

38.357

T8

JA - M

1.955

16.164

2.428

12.315

2.576

54.270

T9

JA - H

2.202

25.568

2.823

24.584

2.005

41.247

T10

SA - L

1.796

8.742

2.188

2.697

1.815

35.096

T11

SA - M

2.078

21.126

2.302

7.515

1.822

35.346

T12

SA - H

2.183

24.920

2.294

7.193

1.825

35.452

T13

Control

1.639


2.129


1.178



SEm±

0.094


0.11


0.109



CD (P≤0.05)

0.273


0.319


0.316



CV %

7.832


7.907


9.307


DAS: Days after sowing; DAI: Days after pathogen inoculation; L: Low; M: Medium; H: High

Table 4: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the Catalase activity (μmol of H2O2/min/mg of protein) in the mustard (B-9) against A. brassicicola.

Sr. No.

Treatments

15 DAS

% increase over control

20 DAS

% increase over control

5 DAI

% increase over control

T1

BTH - L

1.883

27.403

2.071

22.308

1.95

44.410

T2

BTH - M

1.955

30.077

2.294

29.861

2.078

47.834

T3

BTH - H

2.071

33.993

2.310

30.346

2.114

48.723

T4

H2O2 - L

1.619

15.565

1.675

3.940

1.572

31.043

T5

H2O2 - M

1.686

18.921

1.741

7.582

1.675

35.284

T6

H2O2 - H

1.721

20.569

1.815

11.350

1.774

38.895

T7

JA - L

1.700

19.588

1.911

15.803

1.844

41.215

T8

JA - M

1.882

27.365

1.955

17.698

1.883

42.432

T9

JA - H

1.911

28.467

2.078

22.570

1.911

43.276

T10

SA - L

1.601

14.616

1.700

5.353

1.675

35.284

T11

SA - M

1.665

17.898

1.725

6.725

1.748

37.986

T12

SA - H

1.782

23.288

1.853

13.168

1.809

40.077

T13

Control

1.367


1.609


1.084



SEm±

0.085


0.099


0.085



CD (P≤0.05)

0.246


0.288


0.247



CV %

8.351


9.034


8.263


DAS: Days after sowing; DAI: Days after pathogen inoculation; L: Low; M: Medium; H: High

Table 5: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the Catalase activity (μmol of H2O2/min/mg of protein) in the mustard varieties against A. brassicicola

Inducers / varieties

TBM-204

Bullet

B-54

B-9

15 DAS

20 DAS

5 DAI

15 DAS

20 DAS

5 DAI

15 DAS

20 DAS

5 DAI

15 DAS

20 DAS

5 DAI

BTH

3.194

3.635

3.200

2.816

3.248

2.709

2.431

2.724

2.645

1.970

2.225

2.047

H2O2

2.701

2.828

2.576

2.185

2.767

2.454

1.999

2.187

1.742

1.675

1.744

1.674

JA

2.804

3.202

2.791

2.416

2.902

2.619

2.003

2.545

2.164

1.831

1.982

1.879

SA

2.753

3.048

2.643

2.268

2.860

2.539

2.019

2.261

1.821

1.682

1.759

1.744

CONTROL

2.511

2.790

2.418

2.107

2.455

2.382

1.639

2.129

1.178

1.367

1.609

1.084

Factors

Inducers (I)

Varieties (V)

Days of sampling (D)

I  × V

I × D

V × D

I × V × D

SE(m)

0.028

0.025

0.022

0.057

0.049

0.044

0.098

SE(d)

0.04

0.036

0.031

0.08

0.069

0.062

0.139

C.D.

0.079

0.071

0.061

NS

NS

0.123

0.275

Fig. 1. Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the Catalase activity in the mustard varieties against A. brassicicola.

Table 6: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the ascorbic acid content (mg/100 g FW) in the mustard (TBM-204) against A. brassicicola

Sr. No.

Treatments

15 DAS

% increase over control

20 DAS

% increase over control

5 DAI

% increase over control

T1

BTH - L

66.372

47.344

86.411

58.869

96.609

58.751

T2

BTH - M

71.233

50.938

110.008

67.692

114.040

65.056

T3

BTH - H

83.249

58.019

119.613

70.286

125.542

68.258

T4

H2O2 - L

50.087

30.224

42.182

15.742

51.233

22.219

T5

H2O2 - M

53.842

35.090

48.822

27.202

57.004

30.093

T6

H2O2 - H

54.711

36.122

56.727

37.347

68.941

42.197

T7

JA - L

65.186

46.386

72.300

50.842

86.609

53.989

T8

JA - M

68.980

49.335

80.008

55.578

92.063

56.715

T9

JA - H

73.842

52.671

83.328

57.348

97.597

59.169

T10

SA - L

55.542

37.077

61.866

42.550

71.194

44.026

T11

SA - M

59.455

41.218

65.779

45.968

77.202

48.382

T12

SA - H

68.941

49.306

77.202

53.963

87.834

54.631

T13

Control

34.949


35.542


39.850



SE m ±

2.280


2.964


3.417



CD (P≤0.05)

6.627


8.615


9.932



CV %

6.366


7.102


7.220


    DAS: Days after sowing; DAI: Days after pathogen inoculation; L: Low; M: Medium; H: High

Table 7: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the ascorbic acid content (mg/100 g FW) in the mustard (Bullet) against A. brassicicola.

Sr. No.

Treatments

15 DAS

% increase over control

20 DAS

% increase over control

5 DAI

% increase over control

T1

BTH - L

41.391

26.547

52.221

40.039

80.09

57.744

T2

BTH - M

41.945

27.516

56.530

44.609

91.04

62.826

T3

BTH - H

42.221

27.991

63.842

50.953

94.95

64.358

T4

H2O2 - L

30.838

1.410

35.163

10.952

46.53

27.268

T5

H2O2 - M

32.024

5.060

37.557

16.628

47.83

29.251

T6

H2O2 - H

35.186

13.592

39.455

20.637

57.24

40.878

T7

JA - L

40.798

25.480

47.834

34.540

78.11

56.674

T8

JA - M

41.115

26.053

53.842

41.844

79.89

57.639

T9

JA - H

41.352

26.477

58.111

46.116

89.45

62.169

T10

SA - L

34.711

12.412

40.087

21.889

67.56

49.906

T11

SA - M

35.186

13.592

40.285

22.272

68.94

50.912

T12

SA - H

37.834

19.641

40.403

22.500

78.55

56.914

T13

Control

30.403


31.312


33.84



SEm±

1.185


1.952


2.21



CD (P≤0.05)

3.444


5.674


3.13



CV %

5.502


7.368


5.45


    DAS: Days after sowing; DAI: Days after pathogen inoculation; L: Low; M: Medium; H: High

Table 8: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the ascorbic acid content (mg/100 g FW) in the mustard (B-54) against A. brassicicola.

Sr. No.

Treatments

15 DAS

% increase over control

20 DAS

% increase over control

5 DAI

% increase over control

T1

BTH - L

34.672

19.722

38.111

20.224

78.625

60.275

T2

BTH - M

35.282

21.110

38.308

20.636

80.087

61.001

T3

BTH - H

39.076

28.770

43.842

30.653

84.672

63.113

T4

H2O2 - L

27.874

0.142

34.175

11.037

42.070

25.759

T5

H2O2 - M

29.348

5.158

35.186

13.592

45.107

30.757

T6

H2O2 - H

30.324

8.212

37.241

18.361

51.194

38.990

T7

JA - L

32.436

14.188

37.913

19.808

68.545

54.434

T8

JA - M

34.034

18.218

38.071

20.141

72.024

56.635

T9

JA - H

38.150

27.041

41.036

25.910

78.941

60.435

T10

SA - L

30.838

9.741

37.399

18.706

56.648

44.865

T11

SA - M

31.312

11.108

37.439

18.792

57.834

45.995

T12

SA - H

34.063

18.287

37.794

19.557

68.111

54.143

T13

Control

27.834


30.403


31.233



SEm±

1.479


1.376


2.652



CD (P≤0.05)

4.299


3.998


7.708



CV %

7.832


6.362


7.326


DAS: Days after sowing; DAI: Days after pathogen inoculation; L: Low; M: Medium; H: High

Table 9: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the ascorbic acid contentmg/100 g FW) in the mustard (B-9) against A. brassicicola.

Sr. No.

Treatments

15 DAS

% increase over control

20 DAS

% increase over control

5 DAI

% increase over control

T1

BTH - L

19.356

15.254

33.249

31.740

66.372

62.828

T2

BTH - M

19.474

15.770

34.711

34.616

68.980

64.233

T3

BTH - H

22.194

26.091

35.542

36.143

72.103

65.782

T4

H2O2 - L

16.569

1.002

26.648

14.832

38.545

35.993

T5

H2O2 - M

17.340

5.402

27.004

15.954

40.087

38.454

T6

H2O2 - H

17.399

5.725

30.680

26.024

44.949

45.111

T7

JA - L

19.119

14.203

31.826

28.689

58.111

57.543

T8

JA - M

19.119

14.203

32.696

30.585

61.352

59.786

T9

JA - H

21.141

22.411

33.644

32.542

69.455

64.478

T10

SA - L

18.763

12.576

29.889

24.068

38.071

35.195

T11

SA - M

19.059

13.936

30.324

25.156

41.352

40.336

T12

SA - H

19.059

13.936

31.747

28.511

47.557

48.122

T13

Control

16.403


22.696


24.672



SEm±

1.033


1.307


1.945



CD (P≤0.05)

3.004


3.800


5.653



CV %

9.498


7.347


6.520


(DAS: Days after sowing; DAI: Days after pathogen inoculation; L: Low; M: Medium; H: High

Table 10: Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the ascorbic acid content (mg/100 g FW) in the mustard varieties against A. brassicicola.

Inducers / varieties

TBM-204

Bullet

B-54

B-9

15 DAS

20 DAS

5 DAI

15 DAS

20 DAS

5 DAI

15 DAS

20 DAS

5 DAI

15 DAS

20 DAS

5 DAI

BTH

73.618

105.344

112.063

41.852

57.531

88.690

36.343

40.087

81.128

20.341

34.501

69.152

H2O2

52.880

49.244

59.059

32.682

37.392

50.535

29.182

35.534

46.123

17.103

28.111

41.194

JA

69.336

78.545

92.090

41.088

53.262

82.485

34.874

39.007

73.170

19.793

32.722

62.972

SA

61.312

68.282

78.743

35.910

40.258

71.681

32.071

37.544

60.864

18.960

30.653

42.327

CONTROL

34.949

35.542

39.850

30.403

31.312

33.842

27.834

30.403

31.233

16.403

22.696

24.672

Factors

Inducers

Varieties

Days of sampling

I  × V

I  × D

V × D

I × V × D

SE(m)

0.478

0.428

0.37

0.956

0.828

0.741

1.657

SE(d)

0.676

0.605

0.524

1.353

1.171

1.048

2.343

C.D.

1.339

1.198

1.037

2.678

2.319

2.075

4.639

Fig. 2. Effect of inducers at different concentrations on the ascorbic acid content in the mustard varieties against A. brassicicola.

Above findings are strongly supported by the report of Mallick et al. (2017). Ascorbic acid, acts as powerful antioxidant in tissues and an enhanced level has also been observed in stressed plants as a resistance index against the pathogen (Gupta et al., 2012). When the ROS level increases in plants that are exposed to stress, enhanced production of non enzymatic antioxidants in plant cells like ascorbic acid will play a crucial role in minimizing ROS induced oxidative stress (Gill and Tuteja 2010). In this study it is indicated that the less or reduced accumulation of ascorbic acid in B-54 and B-9 varieties favours the oxidative stress and invasion of pathogen deep into the host and finally cause the injury or symptoms in the plant. Necrotrophs appear to stimulate ROS production in the infected tissue to induce cell death that facilitates subsequent infection (Govrin and Levine 2000). This might suggest that the redox state of acorbate could be a defensive response in resistant varieties TBM-204 and Bullet against Alternaria. Moreover, the changes in total concentration and redox state of ascorbic acid can regulate the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins (Foyer and Noctor 2005), induce the accumulation of phytoalexins (De Gara et al., 2003).

Conclusion

The activation of antioxidant mechanism of the plant, where both, enzymatic antioxidant like catalase and non-enzymatic antioxidant like ascorbic acid were comparatively found to be more in TBM-204 and Bullet through which we can consider them as resistant varieties. The high levels of catalase played an important role in reducing the damage caused by the pathogen by dismutating O2•− and catalyzing H2O2 in resistant in coordination with the non-enzymatic antioxidants. However, it can be assumed that in B-54 and B-9 varieties an uncontrollable production of reactive oxygen species may be coupled with the less potentiality of antioxidant system created the oxidative stress.

Here also noticed that with increase the age of the plant ascorbic acid content was also increased and more focused when the plants were inoculated with pathogen irrespective of inducers and their doses applied in four different cultivars. Here all the inducers increased the ascorbic acid content significantly in comparison to control and maximum in BTH whereas as minimum in H2O2. 

References

Aebi, H. (1984). Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology, 105, 121-126.

Davies, S. H. R. & Masten, S. J. (1991). Spectrophotometric method for ascorbic acid using dichlorophenolindophenol: elimination of the interference due to iron. Analytica Chimica Acta, 248, 225-227.

De Gara, L., De Pinto, M. C. & Tommasi, F. (2003). The antioxidant systems vis-a-vis reactive oxygen species during plant-pathogen interaction. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 41, 863-870.

Economic Survey (2020-21). Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Delhi.

Foyer, C. H. & Noctor, G. (2005). Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: a re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant, Cell and Environment, 28, 1056-1071.

Gill, S. S. & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants.Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48, 909-30.

Govrin, E & d Levine, A. (2000). The hypersensitive response facilitates plant infection by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Current Biology, 10, 751-757.

Gupta, M., Summuna, B., Gupta, S. & Mallick, S. A. (2012). Assessing the role of biochemical constituents in rapeseed mustard. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 42, 463-468.

Jung, S. (2004). Variation in antioxidant metabolism of young and mature leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana subjected to drought. Plant Science, 166, 459-466.

Kolte, S. J. (1986). Important diseases of rapeseed and mustard in India: Present research progress and future research needs. In Proc. IDRC, Canada, 3rdOil Crops Network Workshop held in Addis Abada, Ethiopia, Oct. 6-10, 1986: pp. 91-106.

Liu, J., Xie, X., Du, J., Sun, J. & Bai, X. (2008). Effects of simultaneous drought and heat stress on Kentucky bluegrass. Journal of Horticultural Science, 115, 190-195.

Mallick, S. A., Kumari, P., Gupta, M., Gupta, S. & Jeelani, M. I. (2017). Augmentation of biochemical defense against Alternaria blight of mustard by induction of drought stress. Journal of Plant Pathology, 99, 47-60. 

Meena, P. D., Awasthi, R. P., Chattopadhyay, C., Kolte, S. J. and Kumar, A. (2010). Alternaria blight: a chronic disease inrapeseed-mustard. Journal of Oilseed Brassica, 1, 1–11.

Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, (2019). Government of India.Area, Production and Productivity of Rapeseed and Mustard in India. (www.indiastat.com).

Pan, Y., Wu, L. J. & Yu, Z. L. (2006). Effect of salt and drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD isoenzymes of liquorice (Glycorhiza uralensis Fisch). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 49, 157–165.

Song, F. and Goodman, R. M. (2001). Molecular biology of disease resistance in rice. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 59, 1-11.

Subhani, A., Asif, M., Atiq, M., Imran, M., Hameed, A., Qadus, A., Ali, S., Sultan, A., Akmal, M., Haq, M. H., Umar Farooq, U. & Rajput, N. A. (2018). Progressive impact of alternaria blight on antioxidants enzyme of mustard leaves after infection of Alternaria brassicae to induce resistance. International Journal of Biosciences, 13, 417-426.

Vishunavat, K. & Kolte, S. J. (2008). Essentials of phytopathological techniques. pp. 30-33. Ludhiana: Kalyani Publishers.

How to cite this article

M. Divya, Srikanta Das  and Sunita Mahapatra  (2024). Evaluation of Antioxidants in Different Mustard Cultivars Against Alternaria Blight. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(6): 135-142.