Author:
Rajasulochana N.1, Rageshwari S.2*, Anbukkarasi K.3 and Rex B.4
Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(8): 60-66, 2025
Address:
1Post Graduate Scholar, Department of Plant Pathology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), India.
2Assistant Professor (Sr. Grade), Department of Plant Pathology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), India.
3Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), India.
4Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), India.
(Corresponding author: Rageshwari S.*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.8.11
Blackgram, Dry root rot, chitinolytic bacteria, biocontrol, sustainable agriculture.
Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.), a member of the Fabaceae family, is one of the most important pulse crops and has been a staple in the human diet since ancient times. It is highly nutritious, containing 24% protein, 60% carbohydrates, 3.2% minerals, 0.9% fibre, and is a good source of iron (9.1 mg/100g), calcium (154 mg/100g), and phosphorus (385 mg/100g). India is both the largest producer and consumer of black gram, cultivating it on about 4.1 million hectares. The country produces between 2.2 and 2.8 million tonnes annually, with an average yield of 540 kg per hectare, contributing 13.05% total pulse production. Major producing states include Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan. Although blackgram is important for both nutrition and agriculture, its cultivation faces several challenges from biotic and abiotic stresses. These stresses significantly reduce both the yield and quality of the seeds. Black gram seeds are often infected by various seed-borne fungi, either on the surface, inside the seed, or both, leading to major losses in quantity and quality. Charcoal rot, caused by the fungus Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid, is one of the most common and harmful diseases of black gram (Pandey et al., 2020). This pathogen can survive in soil for many years and infects plants at any stage of growth (Choudhary et al., 2022; Nisha et al., 2025). The disease causes blackening and rotting of the roots, which eventually leads to wilting and death of the plant in severe cases (Khan and Javid 2023). During infection, M. phaseolina produces toxins, such as botryodiplodin and phaseolinone, which facilitate the invasion of susceptible plants from soil reservoirs, particularly during the overwintering period (Abbas et al., 2019). Chitinases are a group of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of chitin, a major structural component of fungal cell walls. Chitinolytic microorganisms are known to protect plants by breaking down the fungal cell wall, which weakens its structure, leads to cell death, and stops fungal growth (Inbar and Chet 1991). Among them, bacterial chitinases have shown strong antifungal activity and are considered promising agents for the biological control of plant-pathogenic fungi (Ordentlich et al., 1988).
A. Survey and Symptomatology of Pathogen
A field survey was carried out in the major blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) growing regions of Tamil Nadu, namely Chengalpattu, Perambalur, and Tiruchirapalli districts to assess the prevalence of charcoal rot. Disease incidence was calculated using the formula proposed by Wheeler (1969), and the observed symptoms were carefully documented for diagnostic and research purposes.
B. Isolation of the charcoal rot pathogen of blackgram
The pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina, responsible for charcoal rot, was isolated from black gram plants showing typical symptoms like dark brown lesions and bark shredding. Infected tissues, about 1 cm in size, were cut and surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 30 seconds, then rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. The tissues were dried with sterile tissue paper and placed on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium supplemented with streptomycin (Choudhary et al., 2011). The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2°C for five days to promote fungal growth. Emerging fungal colonies were purified using the hyphal tip method (Dhingra and Sinclair 1978). Mature cultures were then observed for mycelial characteristics.
C. Isolation of chitinolytic bacteria from partially degraded cow horn
Soil sample from partially degraded cow horn was collected and processed using serial dilution and spread plate techniques. One millilitre of each dilution was plated in triplicate on minimal salt medium (MSM) containing colloidal chitin (10, 50, and 250 ppm) as the sole carbon source (Kuddus & Ahmad, 2013). The MSM was prepared by combining Na₂HPO₄, KH₂PO₄, NH₄Cl, NaCl, yeast extract, agar, and colloidal chitin in 1 litre of sterile water. The plates were kept at 28°C for 3 days, and later chitin-degrading bacteria were identified by the formation of clear zones around the colonies. The isolated colonies were subsequently transferred to nutrient agar plates and incubated at 28°C to promote further growth. Positive colonies were preserved as pure cultures and stored in glycerol stock for future use.
D. Qualitative assay for chitinolytic activity using NA minimal medium
To detect chitinolytic activity, bacterial isolates were grown on a minimal Nutrient Agar (NA) medium supplemented with bromocresol purple dye. The presence of chitinase activity was confirmed by the appearance of a clear halo zone around the bacterial colonies, indicating the breakdown of chitin.
E. Comparative evaluation of growth media for enhanced chitinase production by chitinolytic bacteria
To study chitinase production, selected chitinolytic bacteria were grown in four different nutrient media: LB Broth, Nutrient Broth, M2 (chitin 10g/l, peptone1g/l, (NH4)2SO4 2g/l), and M3 (chitin 10g/l, peptone1.8g/l, (NH4)2SO41.6g/l, KH2PO4 0.5g/l, K₂HPO₄ 0.5g/l, Mg(SO4)·7H2O 2g/l). Each medium contained 0.4% colloidal chitin and was sterilized before use. About 5 mL of each medium was inoculated with a bacterial isolate and incubated at 30°C for 3 days in a shaking incubator. After incubation, the cultures were spun at 8,000 rpm for 5 minutes to remove the cells. The clear liquid (supernatant) was then used to measure chitinase activity using a colour test method at 540 nm, as described by Ohtakara (1988).
F. Screening of chitinolytic bacterial isolates against the charcoal rot pathogen against M.phaseolina
Chitinolytic bacterial isolates were assessed for their antagonistic activity against M. phaseolina using the dual culture technique described by Dennis and Webster (1971). The antagonistic effect of the bacterial isolates was quantified as Percentage Inhibition (PI) over control, following the formula proposed by Vincent (1947).
PI = [(C - T) / C] × 100
Where C - radial growth (in mm) of the pathogen (control),
T - radial growth observed in the presence of the antagonistic organism.
A. Survey and Symptomatology of Pathogen
A field survey carried out in the major blackgram-growing districts of Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu, Perambalur, and Tiruchirapalli, confirmed a widespread incidence of charcoal rot in the commonly cultivated variety, VBN 11. In Trichy district, Solanganallur village recorded the highest percentage of disease incidence (PDI) at 52%, while Kuruvampatti village in the same district showed the lowest incidence at 31% (Table 1).
The manifestation of symptoms like bark shredding and root rot reflects the aggressive nature of M. phaseolina (Noor, 2022) (Fig. 1). These findings underscore the importance of effective disease management strategies, particularly the use of biocontrol agents, to control charcoal rot and sustain blackgram cultivation (Gopalakrishnan et al., 2011).
B. Isolation of the charcoal rot pathogen of blackgram
The pathogen was isolated and grown in PDA, and the pathogen developed whitish-grey to black aerial mycelial growth, ranging from sparse to dense, on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (Fig. 2). Various morphological and cultural variations were observed in M. phaseolina (Table 2). Kaur et al. (2013) revealed that, M. phaseolina strains produced a wide range of mycelial characteristics, from sparse to dense growth and colours varying between whitish-grey and black, indicating considerable strain variability. Such morphological differences may influence the pathogen’s level of aggressiveness, presenting difficulties in effective field management (Iqbal & Mukhtar 2014).
C. Isolation of chitinolytic bacteria from partially degraded cow horn
A total of 27 isolates having antagonistic activity were obtained from the dilutions 10-3 and 10-6 (Fig. 3). The isolates exhibited differences in their colony morphology, ranging from smooth to irregular shapes with wavy, lobate, or rough edges, as well as the presence of clear zones (Table 3). Among all the isolates screened in chitin media, three isolates exhibited extracellular enzyme production. Akindolire et al. (2025) examined the morphological characters of bacterial isolates capable of producing hydrolytic enzymes from psychrophilic anaerobic digestion system (PAD) revealed a wide range of colony traits, including differences in shape, elevation, margin, and pigmentation. This variety in morphology indicates a diverse bacterial population with the potential to produce various bioactive compounds, highlighting cow horn as a valuable resource for discovering prospective biocontrol agents (Jayachandran et al., 2016).
D. Qualitative assay for chitinolytic activity using NA minimal medium
Clear zones were observed around the three bacterial colonies grown on Nutrient Agar (NA) medium supplemented with bromocresol purple dye, indicating chitinase activity. These chitinolytic bacteria were able to degrade the colloidal chitin present in the medium, resulting in the formation of halos and a colour change around the colonies. This visual change, caused by a shift in pH due to chitin degradation, confirmed the production of chitinase enzymes by the isolates. The results demonstrated that minimal NA medium with bromocresol purple is effective for detecting chitinolytic activity. Additionally, the bacteria also utilized other nutrients present in the medium, such as peptone and beef extract (Fig. 4). The incorporation of bromocresol purple, a pH-sensitive dye, allowed for easy visual identification of enzymatic activity.
This assay effectively validated the chitinase-producing potential of the isolates and proved to be a reliable screening method for identifying chitinolytic bacteria (Agrawal & Kotasthane 2012; Kuddus & Ahmad 2013).
E. Comparative evaluation of growth media for enhanced chitinase production by chitinolytic bacteria
The chitinase activity of the selected isolates varied clearly across the four different media tested. Among them, the M3 medium showed the highest enzyme production, indicating it had the best nutrient combination to boost chitinase activity (Fig. 5). M2 medium also showed good results, but slightly lower than M3. Luria-Bertani (LB) broth supported a moderate level of enzyme production, while Nutrient Broth showed the lowest chitinase activity. These results suggest that the type of culture medium greatly affects enzyme production, with M3 being the most effective for increasing chitinase activity in the tested bacterial isolates.
While M2 medium also facilitated considerable chitinase activity, it was slightly less effective than M3. In comparison, LB broth showed moderate enzyme production, and Nutrient Broth resulted in the lowest activity (Kuddus & Ahmad 2013).
F. Screening of chitinolytic bacterial isolates against the charcoal rot pathogen against M.phaseolina
A total of 27 chitinolytic bacterial isolates were tested against M. phaseolina, and three of them showed strong ability to reduce the fungal growth in the lab. Among these, Alcaligenes faecalis showed the highest inhibition zone (11 mm), followed by the uncultured bacterium (9.5 mm), and Sphingobacterium thalpophilum (7 mm), compared to the control (Fig. 6). In all three cases, the fungal growth appeared greyish white, and the development of pycnidia and microsclerotia was delayed (Table 4). These three effective isolates were chosen for further study.
In addition, a dual culture test using Trichoderma longibrachiatum against S. rolfsii and M. phaseolina showed that the fungus was directly suppressed, likely through antibiotic-like action (Sridharan et al., 2020). The delay in fungal structure development suggests that these bacterial isolates could be promising biocontrol agents (Gopalakrishnan et al., 2011).
Table 1: Survey and Symptomology.
Sr. No. | District | Village | GPS coordinates | Isolate | Variety | PDI% |
1. | Chengalpattu | Baburayanpettai | Lat 12.363625 Long 79.86259 | MP1 | VBN 11 | 48% |
2. | Trichy | Solanganallur | Lat 10.945206 Long 78.608619 | MP2 | VBN 11 | 52% |
3. | Trichy | Kuruvampatti | Lat 10.942608 Long 78.60139 | MP3 | VBN 11 | 31% |
4. | Perambalur | Chathiramanai | Lat 11.171164 Long 78.78529 | MP4 | VBN 11 | 45% |
(Survey carried out in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) cultivating areas of Tamil Nadu to evaluate the incidence of charcoal rot.)
Table 2: Morphological characterization of M. phaseolina.
Sr. No. | Isolation | Radial mycelial growth (in mm) | Mycelial character | Sporulation (Days) |
1. | MP1 | 90 | Greyish black mycelium, raised margin | 5 |
2. | MP2 | 88 | Greyish black mycelium with raised margin | 4 |
3. | MP3 | 87 | Grey to white with fluffy mycelium, raised margin | 7 |
4. | MP4 | 90 | Greyish black mycelium with raised margin | 5 |
(Variations observed in different isolates of M. phaseolina collected from different zones of Tamil Nadu.)
Table 3: Morphological character of chitinolytic bacteria.
Sr. No. | Bacteria isolates | Color | Growth | Characters |
1. | BCH 1 | Yellow | Slimy Colony | Smooth, Round Shape |
2. | BCH 2 | Dirty White | Rough | Irregular, Undulate, Swarming |
3. | BCH 3 | Whitish Yellow | Slimy | Smooth, Round |
4. | BCH 4 | Light Brown | Slimy | Smooth, Umbonate |
5. | BCH 5 | Yellowish Brown | Slimy | Smooth, Round |
6. | BCH 6 | Brown | Slightly Slimy | Slight Smooth, Irregular Undulate |
7. | BCH 7 | Whitish Brown | Slimy | Slight Smooth, Raised |
8. | BCH 8 | Dark Brown | Slightly Slimy | Irregular, Lobate |
9. | BCH 9 | Yellowish Brown | Slightly Slimy | Smooth, Irregular, Filamentous |
10. | BCH 10 | Light Yellow | Slightly Slimy | Filamentous, Irregular, Undulate |
11. | BCH 11 | Brownish | Slimy | Filamentous, Irregular, Lobate |
12. | BCH 12 | Whitish Brown | Slightly Slimy | Irregular, Undulate, Translucent, Rugose |
13. | BCH 13 | Dirty White | Slimy | Irregular, Lobate |
14. | BCH 14 | White | Slimy | Irregular, Umbonate |
15. | BCH 15 | Pure White | Slimy | Undulate, Wavy, Irregular |
16. | BCH 16 | Dirty White | Slimy | Irregular, Undulate, Wavy |
17. | BCH 17 | Yellowish White | Slimy | Serrate, Scalloped Margin |
18. | BCH 18 | Dirty White | Smooth | Irregular, Serrate |
19. | BCH 19 | Yellowish Brown | Slimy | Irregular, Lobate, Swarming |
20. | BCH 20 | Light Brown | Slightly Slimy | Round, Umbonate, Serrate Margin |
21. | BCH 21 | Dirty White | Rough | Irregular Raised Colony Elevation |
22. | BCH 22 | White | Slimy | Round, Convex |
23. | BCH 23 | Yellowish Brown | Slightly Slimy | Irregular Raised Colony |
24. | BCH 24 | Brown | Slimy | Round, Entire Margin, Convex |
25. | BCH 25 | Dirty Brown | Slightly Slimy | Irregular, Undulate |
26. | BCH 26 | Dirty Brown | Slimy | Irregular, Lobate |
27. | BCH 27 | Light Brown | Slimy | Irregular Convex Colony, Undulate |
(The bacterial isolates were morphologically characterized based on sliminess, colour and colony characters)
Table 4: Screening of chitinolytic bacterial isolates against the M. phaseolina infection of blackgram – Dual Culture Technique (Dennis and Webster 1971).
Sr. No. | Name | Inhibition zone (mm) | Mycelial growth (mm) | Per cent inhibition over control (%) |
1. | S. thalpophilum | 7b (15.16) | 33b (33.22) | 63.33 |
2. | Uncultured bacterium | 9.5ab (17.67) | 28.5bc (30.80) | 68.33 |
3. | A. faecalis | 11a (19.02) | 27.5c (30.24) | 69.44 |
4. | Control | 0c | 90a (60.62) | 0 |
SE(d) | 1.061 | 1.650 | ||
CD | 2.945 | 4.604 | ||
*Values are the mean of two replications
Fig. 1. Survey and Symptomology.
Fig. 2. Isolation of Macrophomina phaseolina infecting blackgram.
Fig. 3. Different isolates of chitinolytic bacteria isolated from cow horn samples.
Fig. 4. Minimal media of NA for selected chitinolytic bacteria.
Fig. 5. Comparative analysis of growth media for enhanced chitinase production in chitinolytic bacteria.
Fig. 6. Screening of chitinolytic bacterial isolates against the charcoal rot pathogen of blackgram.
Chitinolytic bacteria offers great potential for controlling Macrophomina phaseolina because of its strong biocontrol abilities and eco-friendly traits. Recent improvements in formulation methods, like biopesticide and fungicide using multiple strains together, should improve its effectiveness in the field. Additionally, molecular tools and omics approaches will help create genetically improved strains with better resistance to pests and environmental stress. Using Chitinolytic bacteria in sustainable plant protection strategies could significantly reduce the need for chemical fungicides and pesticide.
Abbas, H. K., Bellaloui, N., Accinelli, C., Smith, J. R. and Shier, W. T. (2019). Toxin production in soybean (Glycine max L.) plants with charcoal rot disease and by Macrophomina phaseolina, the fungus that causes the disease. Toxins, 11(11), 645.
Agrawal, T. and Kotasthane, A. S. (2012). Chitinolytic assay of indigenous Trichoderma isolates collected from different geographical locations of Chhattisgarh in Central India. Springer Plus, 1, 1-10.
Akindolire, M. A., Ndaba, B., Bello-Akinosho, M., Rama. and Roopnarain, A. (2025). Bioprospecting Bacteria From Psychrophilic Anaerobic Digestate for Potential Plant Growth‐Promoting Attributes. International Journal of Microbiology, 2025(1), 2208124.
Choudhary, K., Meena, A. K., Chand, K., Nain, Y. and Maurya, S. (2022). Impact of Epidemiological Factors on the Incidence of Charcoal Rot of Sesamum incited by Macrophomina phaseolina. Biological Forum– An International Journal, 14(1), 264-268.
Choudhary, S., Choudhary, A. K. and Sharma, O. P. (2011). Screening of mungbean (Vigna radiata) genotypes to identify source of resistant to dry root rot. Journal of Food Legumes, 24(2), 117-119.
Dennis, C. and Webster, J. (1971). Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma: I. Production of non-volatile antibiotics. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 57(1), 25-IN3.
Dhingra, O. D. and Sinclair, J. B. (1978). Biology and pathology of Macrophomina phaseolina.
Gopalakrishnan, S., Kiran, B. K., Humayun, P., Vidya, M. S., Deepthi, K., Jacob, S. and Rupela, O. (2011). Biocontrol of charcoal-rot of sorghum by actinomycetes isolated from herbal vermicompost. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(79), 18142-18152.
Inbar, J. and Chet, I. (1991). Evidence that chitinase produced by Aeromonas caviae is involved in the biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens by this bacterium. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 23(10), 973-978.
Iqbal, U. and Mukhtar, T. (2014). Morphological and pathogenic variability among Macrophomina phaseolina isolates associated with mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) Wilczek from Pakistan. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(1), 950175.
Jayachandran, S., Narayanan, U., Selvaraj, A., Jayaraman, A. and Karuppan, P. (2016). Microbial characterization and anti-microbial properties of cowhorn silica manure controlling rice pathogens. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 5(4), 186-92.
Kaur, S., Dhillon, G. S. and Chauhan, V. B. (2013). Morphological and pathogenic variability in Macrophomina phaseolina isolates of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) and their relatedness using principle component analysis. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 46(19), 2281-2293.
Khan, I. H, and Javaid, A. (2023). Macrophomina phaseolina causing various diseases in different crops. In Macrophomina Phaseolina (pp. 21-31). Academic Press.
Kuddus, M. and Ahmad, I. Z. (2013). Isolation of novel chitinolytic bacteria and production optimization of extracellular chitinase. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 11(1), 39-46.
Nisha Nitharwal, Mahabeer Singh, Sonali Meena, Shri Kishan Bairwa, Shankar Lal Bijarniya and Harish Kumar Bijarniya (2025). Survey, Cultural Variation and Pathogenicity of Macrophomina phaseolina causing Stem and Root Rot of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in Jaipur District of Rajasthan. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 17(1), 107-112.
Noor, A. (2022). Understanding the physiological and molecular aspects of charcoal rot resistance mechanisms in sorghum and soybean. Kansas State University.
Ohtakara, A. (1988). Chitinase and β-N-acetylhexosaminidase from Pycnoporus cinnabarinus. In Methods in Enzymology, 161, 462-470). Academic Press.
Ordentlich, A., Elad, Y. and Chet, I. (1988). The role of chitinase of Serratia marcescens in biocontrol of Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology, 78(1), 84-88.
Pandey, A. K., Burlakoti, R. R., Rathore, A. and Nair, R. M. (2020). Morphological and molecular characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina isolated from three legume crops and evaluation of mungbean genotypes for resistance to dry root rot. Crop Protect., 127(2), 235-240.
Sridharan, A. P., Thankappan, S., Karthikeyan, G. and Uthandi, S. (2020). Comprehensive profiling of the VOCs of Trichoderma longibrachiatum EF5 while interacting with Sclerotium rolfsii and Macrophomina phaseolina. Microbiological Research, 236, 126436.
Vincent, J. M. (1947). Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature, 159(4051), 850-850.