Exploiting the Potential of Chitinolytic Bacteria Against Dry Root Rot Pathogen Infecting Black Gram

Author:

Rajasulochana N.1, Rageshwari S.2*, Anbukkarasi K.3 and Rex B.4

Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(8): 60-66, 2025

Address:

1Post Graduate Scholar, Department of Plant Pathology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), India.

2Assistant Professor (Sr. Grade), Department of Plant Pathology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), India.

3Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), India.

4Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), India.

(Corresponding author: Rageshwari S.*)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.8.11

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Black gram (Vigna mungo L.) is a vital pulse crop extensively cultivated across India, valued for its high protein content and soil-enriching properties. However, its productivity is frequently hampered by dry root rot, a devastating disease caused by the soil-borne fungus Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid, particularly under drought and high-temperature conditions. To provide a sustainable and eco-friendly solution, this study explored the biocontrol potential of chitinolytic bacteria against M. phaseolina. A field survey was conducted in major black gram-producing regions of Tamil Nadu to assess disease incidence. The pathogen was isolated from infected plants and identified through morphological methods. Simultaneously, bacterial isolates were obtained from partially degraded cow horn samples and screened for chitinolytic activity using different culture media. Among the 27 isolates tested, three strains BCH2, BCH10, and BCH14 demonstrated significant chitinase activity. Of the media tested, M3 medium supported the highest enzyme production. Dual culture assays were conducted to evaluate antagonistic potential against M. phaseolina. All three isolates inhibited fungal growth, with BCH14 showing the most prominent suppression zone, indicating strong antagonistic ability. The results suggest that chitinolytic bacteria, particularly BCH14, possess promising biocontrol efficacy and could serve as a viable alternative to chemical fungicides. This study contributes to the development of eco-friendly, microbe-based strategies for effective management of charcoal rot in black gram, supporting sustainable agriculture and reducing dependency on synthetic agrochemicals.

Keywords

Blackgram, Dry root rot, chitinolytic bacteria, biocontrol, sustainable agriculture.

Introduction

Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.), a member of the Fabaceae family, is one of the most important pulse crops and has been a staple in the human diet since ancient times. It is highly nutritious, containing 24% protein, 60% carbohydrates, 3.2% minerals, 0.9% fibre, and is a good source of iron (9.1 mg/100g), calcium (154 mg/100g), and phosphorus (385 mg/100g). India is both the largest producer and consumer of black gram, cultivating it on about 4.1 million hectares. The country produces between 2.2 and 2.8 million tonnes annually, with an average yield of 540 kg per hectare, contributing 13.05% total pulse production. Major producing states include Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan. Although blackgram is important for both nutrition and agriculture, its cultivation faces several challenges from biotic and abiotic stresses. These stresses significantly reduce both the yield and quality of the seeds. Black gram seeds are often infected by various seed-borne fungi, either on the surface, inside the seed, or both, leading to major losses in quantity and quality. Charcoal rot, caused by the fungus Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid, is one of the most common and harmful diseases of black gram (Pandey et al., 2020). This pathogen can survive in soil for many years and infects plants at any stage of growth (Choudhary et al., 2022; Nisha et al., 2025). The disease causes blackening and rotting of the roots, which eventually leads to wilting and death of the plant in severe cases (Khan and Javid 2023). During infection, M. phaseolina produces toxins, such as botryodiplodin and phaseolinone, which facilitate the invasion of susceptible plants from soil reservoirs, particularly during the overwintering period (Abbas et al., 2019). Chitinases are a group of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of chitin, a major structural component of fungal cell walls. Chitinolytic microorganisms are known to protect plants by breaking down the fungal cell wall, which weakens its structure, leads to cell death, and stops fungal growth (Inbar and Chet 1991). Among them, bacterial chitinases have shown strong antifungal activity and are considered promising agents for the biological control of plant-pathogenic fungi (Ordentlich et al., 1988).

Material & Methods

A. Survey and Symptomatology of Pathogen

A field survey was carried out in the major blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) growing regions of Tamil Nadu, namely Chengalpattu, Perambalur, and Tiruchirapalli districts to assess the prevalence of charcoal rot. Disease incidence was calculated using the formula proposed by Wheeler (1969), and the observed symptoms were carefully documented for diagnostic and research purposes. 

B. Isolation of the charcoal rot pathogen of blackgram

The pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina, responsible for charcoal rot, was isolated from black gram plants showing typical symptoms like dark brown lesions and bark shredding. Infected tissues, about 1 cm in size, were cut and surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 30 seconds, then rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. The tissues were dried with sterile tissue paper and placed on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium supplemented with streptomycin (Choudhary et al., 2011). The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2°C for five days to promote fungal growth. Emerging fungal colonies were purified using the hyphal tip method (Dhingra and Sinclair 1978). Mature cultures were then observed for mycelial characteristics.

C. Isolation of chitinolytic bacteria from partially degraded cow horn

Soil sample from partially degraded cow horn was collected and processed using serial dilution and spread plate techniques. One millilitre of each dilution was plated in triplicate on minimal salt medium (MSM) containing colloidal chitin (10, 50, and 250 ppm) as the sole carbon source (Kuddus & Ahmad, 2013). The MSM was prepared by combining Na₂HPO₄, KH₂PO₄, NH₄Cl, NaCl, yeast extract, agar, and colloidal chitin in 1 litre of sterile water. The plates were kept at 28°C for 3 days, and later chitin-degrading bacteria were identified by the formation of clear zones around the colonies. The isolated colonies were subsequently transferred to nutrient agar plates and incubated at 28°C to promote further growth. Positive colonies were preserved as pure cultures and stored in glycerol stock for future use.

D. Qualitative assay for chitinolytic activity using NA minimal medium

To detect chitinolytic activity, bacterial isolates were grown on a minimal Nutrient Agar (NA) medium supplemented with bromocresol purple dye. The presence of chitinase activity was confirmed by the appearance of a clear halo zone around the bacterial colonies, indicating the breakdown of chitin.

E. Comparative evaluation of growth media for enhanced chitinase production by chitinolytic bacteria

To study chitinase production, selected chitinolytic bacteria were grown in four different nutrient media: LB Broth, Nutrient Broth, M2 (chitin 10g/l, peptone1g/l, (NH4)2SO4 2g/l), and M3 (chitin 10g/l, peptone1.8g/l, (NH4)2SO41.6g/l, KH2PO4 0.5g/l, K₂HPO₄ 0.5g/l, Mg(SO4)·7H2O 2g/l). Each medium contained 0.4% colloidal chitin and was sterilized before use. About 5 mL of each medium was inoculated with a bacterial isolate and incubated at 30°C for 3 days in a shaking incubator. After incubation, the cultures were spun at 8,000 rpm for 5 minutes to remove the cells. The clear liquid (supernatant) was then used to measure chitinase activity using a colour test method at 540 nm, as described by Ohtakara (1988).

F. Screening of chitinolytic bacterial isolates against the charcoal rot pathogen against M.phaseolina

Chitinolytic bacterial isolates were assessed for their antagonistic activity against M. phaseolina using the dual culture technique described by Dennis and Webster (1971).  The antagonistic effect of the bacterial isolates was quantified as Percentage Inhibition (PI) over control, following the formula proposed by Vincent (1947).

PI = [(C - T) / C] × 100

Where C - radial growth (in mm) of the pathogen (control), 

T - radial growth observed in the presence of the antagonistic organism.


Results & Discussion

A. Survey and Symptomatology of Pathogen

A field survey carried out in the major blackgram-growing districts of Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu, Perambalur, and Tiruchirapalli, confirmed a widespread incidence of charcoal rot in the commonly cultivated variety, VBN 11. In Trichy district, Solanganallur village recorded the highest percentage of disease incidence (PDI) at 52%, while Kuruvampatti village in the same district showed the lowest incidence at 31% (Table 1).

The manifestation of symptoms like bark shredding and root rot reflects the aggressive nature of M. phaseolina (Noor, 2022) (Fig. 1). These findings underscore the importance of effective disease management strategies, particularly the use of biocontrol agents, to control charcoal rot and sustain blackgram cultivation (Gopalakrishnan et al., 2011).

B. Isolation of the charcoal rot pathogen of blackgram 

The pathogen was isolated and grown in PDA, and the pathogen developed whitish-grey to black aerial mycelial growth, ranging from sparse to dense, on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (Fig. 2). Various morphological and cultural variations were observed in M. phaseolina (Table  2). Kaur et al. (2013) revealed that, M. phaseolina strains produced a wide range of mycelial characteristics, from sparse to dense growth and colours varying between whitish-grey and black, indicating considerable strain variability. Such morphological differences may influence the pathogen’s level of aggressiveness, presenting difficulties in effective field management (Iqbal & Mukhtar 2014). 

C. Isolation of chitinolytic bacteria from partially degraded cow horn

A total of 27 isolates having antagonistic activity were obtained from the dilutions 10-3 and 10-6 (Fig. 3). The isolates exhibited differences in their colony morphology, ranging from smooth to irregular shapes with wavy, lobate, or rough edges, as well as the presence of clear zones (Table 3). Among all the isolates screened in chitin media, three isolates exhibited extracellular enzyme production. Akindolire et al. (2025) examined the morphological characters of bacterial isolates capable of producing hydrolytic enzymes from psychrophilic anaerobic digestion system (PAD) revealed a wide range of colony traits, including differences in shape, elevation, margin, and pigmentation. This variety in morphology indicates a diverse bacterial population with the potential to produce various bioactive compounds, highlighting cow horn as a valuable resource for discovering prospective biocontrol agents (Jayachandran et al., 2016).

D. Qualitative assay for chitinolytic activity using NA minimal medium

Clear zones were observed around the three bacterial colonies grown on Nutrient Agar (NA) medium supplemented with bromocresol purple dye, indicating chitinase activity. These chitinolytic bacteria were able to degrade the colloidal chitin present in the medium, resulting in the formation of halos and a colour change around the colonies. This visual change, caused by a shift in pH due to chitin degradation, confirmed the production of chitinase enzymes by the isolates. The results demonstrated that minimal NA medium with bromocresol purple is effective for detecting chitinolytic activity. Additionally, the bacteria also utilized other nutrients present in the medium, such as peptone and beef extract (Fig. 4). The incorporation of bromocresol purple, a pH-sensitive dye, allowed for easy visual identification of enzymatic activity.

This assay effectively validated the chitinase-producing potential of the isolates and proved to be a reliable screening method for identifying chitinolytic bacteria (Agrawal & Kotasthane 2012; Kuddus & Ahmad 2013).

E. Comparative evaluation of growth media for enhanced chitinase production by chitinolytic bacteria

The chitinase activity of the selected isolates varied clearly across the four different media tested. Among them, the M3 medium showed the highest enzyme production, indicating it had the best nutrient combination to boost chitinase activity (Fig. 5). M2 medium also showed good results, but slightly lower than M3. Luria-Bertani (LB) broth supported a moderate level of enzyme production, while Nutrient Broth showed the lowest chitinase activity. These results suggest that the type of culture medium greatly affects enzyme production, with M3 being the most effective for increasing chitinase activity in the tested bacterial isolates.

While M2 medium also facilitated considerable chitinase activity, it was slightly less effective than M3. In comparison, LB broth showed moderate enzyme production, and Nutrient Broth resulted in the lowest activity (Kuddus & Ahmad 2013). 

F. Screening of chitinolytic bacterial isolates against the charcoal rot pathogen against M.phaseolina

A total of 27 chitinolytic bacterial isolates were tested against M. phaseolina, and three of them showed strong ability to reduce the fungal growth in the lab. Among these, Alcaligenes faecalis showed the highest inhibition zone (11 mm), followed by the uncultured bacterium (9.5 mm), and Sphingobacterium thalpophilum (7 mm), compared to the control (Fig. 6). In all three cases, the fungal growth appeared greyish white, and the development of pycnidia and microsclerotia was delayed (Table 4). These three effective isolates were chosen for further study.

In addition, a dual culture test using Trichoderma longibrachiatum against S. rolfsii and M. phaseolina showed that the fungus was directly suppressed, likely through antibiotic-like action (Sridharan et al., 2020). The delay in fungal structure development suggests that these bacterial isolates could be promising biocontrol agents (Gopalakrishnan et al., 2011).

Table 1: Survey and Symptomology.

Sr. No.

District

Village

GPS coordinates

Isolate

Variety

PDI%

1.

Chengalpattu

Baburayanpettai

Lat 12.363625

Long 79.86259

MP1

VBN 11

48%

2.

Trichy

Solanganallur

Lat 10.945206

Long 78.608619

MP2

VBN 11

52%

3.

Trichy

Kuruvampatti

Lat 10.942608

Long 78.60139

MP3

VBN 11

31%

4.

Perambalur

Chathiramanai

Lat 11.171164

Long 78.78529

MP4

VBN 11

45%

(Survey carried out in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) cultivating areas of Tamil Nadu to evaluate the incidence of charcoal rot.)

Table 2: Morphological characterization of M. phaseolina.

Sr. No.

Isolation

Radial mycelial growth (in mm)

Mycelial character

Sporulation

(Days)

1.

MP1

90

Greyish black mycelium, raised margin

5

2.

MP2

88


Greyish black mycelium with raised margin

4

3.

MP3

87

Grey to white with fluffy mycelium, raised margin

7

4.

MP4

90

Greyish black mycelium with raised margin

5

(Variations observed in different isolates of M. phaseolina collected from different zones of Tamil Nadu.)

Table 3: Morphological character of chitinolytic bacteria.

Sr. No.

Bacteria isolates

Color

Growth

Characters

1.

BCH 1

Yellow

Slimy Colony

Smooth, Round Shape

2.

BCH 2

Dirty White

Rough

Irregular, Undulate, Swarming

3.

BCH 3

Whitish Yellow

Slimy

Smooth, Round

4.

BCH 4

Light Brown

Slimy

Smooth, Umbonate

5.

BCH 5

Yellowish Brown

Slimy

Smooth, Round

6.

BCH 6

Brown

Slightly Slimy

Slight Smooth, Irregular Undulate

7.

BCH 7

Whitish Brown

Slimy

Slight Smooth, Raised

8.

BCH 8

Dark Brown

Slightly Slimy

Irregular, Lobate

9.

BCH 9

Yellowish Brown

Slightly Slimy

Smooth, Irregular, Filamentous

10.

BCH 10

Light Yellow

Slightly Slimy

Filamentous, Irregular, Undulate

11.

BCH 11

Brownish

Slimy

Filamentous, Irregular, Lobate

12.

BCH 12

Whitish Brown

Slightly Slimy

Irregular, Undulate, Translucent, Rugose

13.

BCH 13

Dirty White

Slimy

Irregular, Lobate

14.

BCH 14

White

Slimy

Irregular, Umbonate

15.

BCH 15

Pure White

Slimy

Undulate, Wavy, Irregular

16.

BCH 16

Dirty White

Slimy

Irregular, Undulate, Wavy

17.

BCH 17

Yellowish White

Slimy

Serrate, Scalloped Margin

18.

BCH 18

Dirty White

Smooth

Irregular, Serrate

19.

BCH 19

Yellowish Brown

Slimy

Irregular, Lobate, Swarming

20.

BCH 20

Light Brown

Slightly Slimy

Round, Umbonate, Serrate Margin

21.

BCH 21

Dirty White

Rough

Irregular Raised Colony Elevation

22.

BCH 22

White

Slimy

Round, Convex

23.

BCH 23

Yellowish Brown

Slightly Slimy

Irregular Raised Colony

24.

BCH 24

Brown

Slimy

Round, Entire Margin, Convex

25.

BCH 25

Dirty Brown

Slightly Slimy

Irregular, Undulate

26.

BCH 26

Dirty Brown

Slimy

Irregular, Lobate

27.

BCH 27

Light Brown

Slimy

Irregular Convex Colony, Undulate

  (The bacterial isolates were morphologically characterized based on sliminess, colour and colony characters)

Table 4: Screening of chitinolytic bacterial isolates against the M. phaseolina infection of blackgram – Dual Culture Technique (Dennis and Webster 1971).

Sr. No.

Name

Inhibition zone (mm)

Mycelial growth (mm)

Per cent inhibition over control (%)

1.

S. thalpophilum

7b

(15.16)

33b

(33.22)

63.33

2.

Uncultured bacterium

9.5ab

(17.67)

28.5bc

(30.80)

68.33

3.

A. faecalis

11a

(19.02)

27.5c

(30.24)

69.44

4.

Control

0c

90a

(60.62)

0

SE(d)

1.061

1.650


CD

2.945

4.604

                    *Values are the mean of two replications 

Fig. 1. Survey and Symptomology.

Fig. 2. Isolation of Macrophomina phaseolina infecting blackgram.

Fig. 3. Different isolates of chitinolytic bacteria isolated from cow horn samples.

Fig. 4. Minimal media of NA for selected chitinolytic bacteria.


Fig. 5. Comparative analysis of growth media for enhanced chitinase production in chitinolytic bacteria.

Fig. 6. Screening of chitinolytic bacterial isolates against the charcoal rot pathogen of blackgram.

Conclusion

This study emphasises the potential of chitinolytic bacteria as an environmentally friendly approach for managing charcoal rot disease in black gram, caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. A field survey conducted across major black gram-growing regions in Tamil Nadu confirmed the presence of the disease. The pathogen was isolated and identified through morphological observations and molecular techniques. Out of 27 bacterial isolates obtained from a cow horn sample, three strains, BCH 2, BCH 10, and BCH14, exhibited strong chitinase activity, which helps break down fungal cell walls. These isolates formed clear zones on chitin-containing media and showed good enzyme production, especially in M3 medium. BCH 14 performed the highest level of effectiveness. These bacteria also grew well in special media designed to detect chitinase activity. Overall, the findings suggested that chitinolytic bacteria, especially BCH 14, could serve as a safe and natural alternative to chemical fungicides. Applying these helpful microbes in agriculture can effectively manage plant diseases, lower the reliance on chemical treatments, and promote environmentally friendly farming. This approach provides a promising way to control charcoal rot in black gram while sustainably enhancing crop health and productivity.

Future Scope

Chitinolytic bacteria offers great potential for controlling Macrophomina phaseolina because of its strong biocontrol abilities and eco-friendly traits. Recent improvements in formulation methods, like biopesticide  and fungicide using multiple strains together, should improve its effectiveness in the field. Additionally, molecular tools and omics approaches will help create genetically improved strains with better resistance to pests and environmental stress. Using Chitinolytic bacteria in sustainable plant protection strategies could significantly reduce the need for chemical fungicides and pesticide.

References

Abbas, H. K., Bellaloui, N., Accinelli, C., Smith, J. R. and Shier, W. T. (2019). Toxin production in soybean (Glycine max L.) plants with charcoal rot disease and by Macrophomina phaseolina, the fungus that causes the disease. Toxins11(11), 645.

Agrawal, T. and Kotasthane, A. S. (2012). Chitinolytic assay of indigenous Trichoderma isolates collected from different geographical locations of Chhattisgarh in Central India. Springer Plus1, 1-10.

Akindolire, M. A., Ndaba, B., Bello-Akinosho, M., Rama. and Roopnarain, A. (2025). Bioprospecting Bacteria From Psychrophilic Anaerobic Digestate for Potential Plant Growth‐Promoting Attributes. International Journal of Microbiology2025(1), 2208124.  

Choudhary, K., Meena, A. K., Chand, K., Nain, Y. and Maurya, S. (2022). Impact of Epidemiological Factors on the Incidence of Charcoal Rot of Sesamum incited by Macrophomina phaseolina. Biological Forum– An International Journal, 14(1), 264-268.

Choudhary, S., Choudhary, A. K. and Sharma, O. P. (2011). Screening of mungbean (Vigna radiata) genotypes to identify source of resistant to dry root rot. Journal of Food Legumes24(2), 117-119.

Dennis, C. and Webster, J. (1971). Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma: I. Production of non-volatile antibiotics. Transactions of the British Mycological Society57(1), 25-IN3.

Dhingra, O. D. and Sinclair, J. B. (1978). Biology and pathology of Macrophomina phaseolina.

Gopalakrishnan, S., Kiran, B. K., Humayun, P., Vidya, M. S., Deepthi, K., Jacob, S. and Rupela, O. (2011). Biocontrol of charcoal-rot of sorghum by actinomycetes isolated from herbal vermicompost. African Journal of Biotechnology10(79), 18142-18152.

Inbar, J. and Chet, I. (1991). Evidence that chitinase produced by Aeromonas caviae is involved in the biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens by this bacterium. Soil Biology and Biochemistry23(10), 973-978.

Iqbal, U. and Mukhtar, T. (2014). Morphological and pathogenic variability among Macrophomina phaseolina isolates associated with mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) Wilczek from Pakistan. The Scientific World Journal2014(1), 950175.

Jayachandran, S., Narayanan, U., Selvaraj, A., Jayaraman, A. and Karuppan, P. (2016). Microbial characterization and anti-microbial properties of cowhorn silica manure controlling rice pathogens. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences5(4), 186-92.

Kaur, S., Dhillon, G. S. and Chauhan, V. B. (2013). Morphological and pathogenic variability in Macrophomina phaseolina isolates of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) and their relatedness using principle component analysis. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection46(19), 2281-2293. 

Khan, I. H, and Javaid, A. (2023). Macrophomina phaseolina causing various diseases in different crops. In Macrophomina Phaseolina (pp. 21-31). Academic Press. 

Kuddus, M. and Ahmad, I. Z. (2013). Isolation of novel chitinolytic bacteria and production optimization of extracellular chitinase. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology11(1), 39-46. 

Nisha Nitharwal, Mahabeer Singh, Sonali Meena, Shri Kishan Bairwa, Shankar Lal Bijarniya and Harish Kumar Bijarniya (2025). Survey, Cultural Variation and Pathogenicity of Macrophomina phaseolina causing Stem and Root Rot of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in Jaipur District of Rajasthan. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 17(1), 107-112.

Noor, A. (2022). Understanding the physiological and molecular aspects of charcoal rot resistance mechanisms in sorghum and soybean. Kansas State University.

Ohtakara, A. (1988). Chitinase and β-N-acetylhexosaminidase from Pycnoporus cinnabarinus. In Methods in Enzymology, 161, 462-470). Academic Press. 

Ordentlich, A., Elad, Y. and Chet, I. (1988). The role of chitinase of Serratia marcescens in biocontrol of Sclerotium rolfsiiPhytopathology78(1), 84-88.

Pandey, A. K., Burlakoti, R. R., Rathore, A. and Nair, R. M. (2020). Morphological and molecular characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina isolated from three legume crops and evaluation of mungbean genotypes for resistance to dry root rot. Crop Protect., 127(2), 235-240. 

Sridharan, A. P., Thankappan, S., Karthikeyan, G. and Uthandi, S. (2020). Comprehensive profiling of the VOCs of Trichoderma longibrachiatum EF5 while interacting with Sclerotium rolfsii and Macrophomina phaseolinaMicrobiological Research236, 126436. 

Vincent, J. M. (1947). Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature159(4051), 850-850.

Wheeler, B. E. J. (1969). An introduction to plant diseases. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, London, New York, Sydney, Toronto. 374 pp. 

How to cite this article

Rajasulochana N., Rageshwari S., Anbukkarasi K. and Rex B.  (2025). Exploiting the Potential of Chitinolytic Bacteria Against Dry Root Rot Pathogen Infecting Black Gram. Biological Forum, 17(8): 60-66.