Author:
Natesan
Krishnamurthy1, Kannan Revathi2*, Rajamanickam
Chandrasekaran3 and Gowtham Subramani2
Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(10): 10-15, 2025
Address:
1Department of
Biotechnology, Selvamm Arts and Science College (Autonomous), Namakkal, (Tamil Nadu),
India.
2Department of
Biotechnology,
Muthayammal
College of Arts and Science (Autonomous), Rasipuram (Tamil Nadu), India.
3Center for Global
Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of
Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai-602105, (Tamil Nadu),
India.
(Corresponding
author: Kannan Revathi*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.10.2
The polyphagous pest Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) poses a significant threat to various economically important crops worldwide. As concerns about environmental sustainability and pesticide resistance grow, there is an increasing interest in developing alternative pest control methods. Plant-derived antifeedants have emerged as promising candidates for eco-friendly pest management strategies. This study investigates the antifeedant properties of Nelumbo nucifera (lotus) extracts against S. litura and their impact on the pest's feeding behavior. N. nucifera, a widely cultivated aquatic plant, has been traditionally used for its medicinal properties and may contain bioactive compounds with potential insecticidal activities. The research aims to evaluate the efficacy of different N. nucifera extracts in deterring S. litura feeding, assess changes in larval behavior, and identify the key phytochemical constituents responsible for the observed antifeedant effects. Understanding the interactions between N. nucifera extracts and S. litura could provide valuable insights for developing novel, environmentally friendly approaches to pest control, potentially reducing reliance on synthetic pesticides and mitigating their associated risks (Joshi et al., 2023a).
Spodoptera litura, commonly known as the tobacco cutworm or cotton leafworm, is a significant agricultural pest affecting various crops worldwide. Its polyphagous nature and ability to develop resistance to conventional pesticides have led researchers to explore alternative control methods, including plant-derived antifeedants (Ahmad & Arif 2009). Nelumbo nucifera, the lotus plant, has garnered attention for its potential pesticidal properties. Traditional uses and preliminary studies suggest it may contain bioactive compounds with insecticidal or antifeedant effects. Investigating its impact on S. litura could provide insights into developing eco-friendly pest management strategies.
Antifeedants are substances that deter insects from feeding, potentially reducing crop damage. They can work through various mechanisms, such as taste deterrence, physiological effects, or by interfering with the insect's ability to recognize host plants. Studying the antifeedant properties of N. nucifera extracts against S. litura could reveal new approaches to pest control (Thangavel et al., 2014). Behavioral changes in S. litura in response to N. nucifera extracts are of particular interest. These may include alterations in feeding patterns, movement (Isman, 2006; Joshi et al., 2023b), oviposition behavior, or overall development. Understanding these changes can provide valuable information about the extract's effectiveness and mode of action (Rajkumar & Jebanesan 2009).
Research in this area typically involves preparing various extracts from different parts of the N. nucifera plant, such as leaves, flowers, or rhizomes. These extracts are then tested in laboratory bioassays to assess their effects on S. litura larvae. Common parameters measured include feeding deterrence, weight gain, mortality rates, and developmental delays (Singh et al., 2012). Phytochemical analysis of N. nucifera extracts is crucial to identify the specific compounds responsible for any observed antifeedant or insecticidal effects. This knowledge can guide further research into isolating and potentially synthesizing effective pest control agents. The potential benefits of using N. nucifera-derived antifeedants extend beyond immediate pest control.
They may offer a more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic pesticides, potentially reducing negative impacts on non-target organisms and ecosystems. However, challenges in developing plant-based pesticides include ensuring consistent efficacy, overcoming potential resistance development, and addressing practical aspects of large-scale production and application (Priya & Chakravarty 2025). Additionally, regulatory considerations and safety assessments for both human health and environmental impact must be thoroughly addressed. This research contributes to the broader field of integrated pest management (IPM), which aims to combine various control strategies to manage pest populations effectively while minimizing environmental harm. Plant-derived antifeedants like those potentially found in N. nucifera could become valuable components of IPM programs.
Future directions in this research area may include investigating synergistic effects with other botanical extracts, exploring formulation techniques to enhance efficacy and stability, and conducting field trials to assess performance under real-world conditions. In conclusion, the study of N. nucifera's antifeedant properties and its effects on S. litura behavior represents a promising avenue in the search for sustainable pest management solutions. By leveraging the natural defensive compounds of plants, researchers aim to develop innovative strategies that can protect crops while minimizing environmental impact. This approach aligns with the growing global emphasis on sustainable agriculture and reduced reliance on synthetic chemicals in food production.
Insect Rearing. Spodoptera litura larvae were collected from infested soybean fields and reared under laboratory conditions at 25 ± 2°C, 65 ± 5% relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 14:10 (L:D) hours. The larvae were maintained on a fresh castor leaf diet until they reached the third instar, which was used for all bioassays.
Plant Material Collection and Extract Preparation. Fresh leaves, flowers, and rhizomes of Nelumbo nucifera were collected from an uncontaminated wetland site. The plant materials were washed, shade-dried, and ground into a fine powder using a mechanical grinder. Extraction was carried out using solvents of increasing polarity (hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and water) via Soxhlet apparatus. The obtained extracts were concentrated using a rotary evaporator and stored at 4°C until use.
Antifeedant activity. Antifeedant activity was assessed using the no-choice leaf disc method. Castor leaf discs (4 cm diameter) were treated with N. nucifera extracts at concentrations of 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% (w/v) and air-dried. Solvent-treated discs served as controls. Individual larvae were placed on treated discs in Petri dishes lined with moist filter paper, and five replicates were maintained per treatment. Feeding deterrence was quantified after 24 hours using image analysis software, and antifeedant index (%) was calculated as: [(C−T)/(C+T)] × 100, where C = control consumption and T = treatment consumption (Thangavel et al., 2014).
To evaluate feeding deterrence behavior, third instar larvae were individually introduced into Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) containing leaf discs (4 cm) treated with N. nucifera extracts at 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% (w/v) concentrations. Control discs were treated with solvent alone. The feeding initiation time was recorded, defined as the time (in minutes) taken by larvae to begin feeding on the treated disc. The feeding duration and extent of leaf consumption over a 24-hour period were also monitored and recorded. Observations were made at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours. A digital leaf area meter or image analysis software was used to quantify the area consumed, and feeding preference was determined using a feeding deterrence index as per Thangavel et al. (2014).
Movement or avoidance responses were assessed using a two-choice behavioral arena assay. A circular filter paper was divided into two equal halves; one half was treated with N. nucifera extract (1.0%) and the other with solvent (control). Each larva was released at the center of the arena and observed for 30 minutes. Behavioral endpoints included time spent on each side, number of entries into the treated zone, and overall movement pattern. Avoidance behavior was inferred if larvae spent significantly more time in the control zone or actively moved away from treated surfaces. Observations were recorded using a digital video recorder and analyzed using behavioral tracking software.
Larval Development and Growth Interference. To assess potential behavioral changes in larval development, third instar larvae were continuously fed on treated leaf material for a period of 72 hours. Parameters monitored included weight gain, instar duration, and molting success. Delays in developmental milestones or abnormalities in behavior (e.g., hyperactivity, reduced responsiveness, sluggishness) were recorded. Larval weights were measured every 24 hours using a precision balance. Observations of sluggish movement or refusal to feed were noted qualitatively as potential signs of sub-lethal behavioral toxicity.
Antifeedant Activity. Nelumbo nucifera extracts exhibited a dose-dependent antifeedant effect on Spodoptera litura larvae. Among the different solvents tested, the methanol extract showed the highest antifeedant activity, with an antifeedant index of 72.5% at 2.0% concentration, followed by aqueous extracts. Significant reductions in leaf area consumed were observed across all treatments compared to controls (p < 0.05). At 1.0% and 2.0% concentrations, treated larvae exhibited prolonged feeding initiation times and consumed considerably less foliage than those in the control group, indicating effective feeding deterrence (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Antifeedant Effect of Nelumbo Nucifera Extracts on S. litura Larvae.
Feeding Initiation and Consumption Behavior. Larvae exposed to treated discs showed clear signs of hesitancy and delayed feeding. The average feeding initiation time increased significantly with concentration, reaching up to 15.6 ± 1.2 minutes in the 2.0% methanol group, compared to 2.3 ± 0.4 minutes in the control (Table 1). Additionally, the feeding duration was substantially shorter in larvae exposed to higher extract concentrations, with minimal to no visible leaf damage in the 2.0% group. These results suggest that the extract impacts both the willingness and ability of larvae to initiate and sustain feeding behavior (Fig. 2).
Table 1: Feeding initiation and consumption behavior.
Concentration | Feeding Initiation Time (min) | Initiation Time ± SD | Feeding Duration (min) | Duration ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 2.3 | ±0.4 | 18.5 | ±1.1 |
0.5% | 6.1 | ±0.7 | 12.7 | ±1.3 |
1.0% | 9.4 | ±0.8 | 8.2 | ±0.9 |
1.5% | 12.2 | ±1.0 | 4.5 | ±0.7 |
2.0% | 15.6 | ±1.2 | 1.1 | ±0.4 |
Fig. 2. Feeding initiation and consumption behavior.
Movement and Avoidance Behavior. In dual-choice behavioral assays, S. litura larvae exhibited strong avoidance behavior toward extract-treated zones. The percentage of time spent in control zones was significantly higher (81.3% ± 3.5 at 2.0% concentration), with larvae showing erratic movement patterns, repeated retraction, and reluctance to remain on treated surfaces (Table 2). In several trials, larvae attempted to leave the assay arena altogether when exposed to higher extract concentrations, highlighting a clear repellency effect. These behavioral changes were dose-dependent and statistically significant (p < 0.01) (Fig. 3).
Table 2: Movement and Avoidance Behavior.
Extract Concentration | Time in Control Zone (%) | ± Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
Control | 50.2 | ±2.1 |
0.5% | 61.7 | ±2.8 |
1.0% | 70.8 | ±3.0 |
1.5% | 75.5 | ±3.2 |
2.0% | 81.3 | ±3.5 |
Fig. 3. Movement and Avoidance Behavior.
Larval Growth and Developmental Impact. Larval weight gain and progression through developmental stages were adversely affected by all extract treatments. After 72 hours of continuous exposure, larvae in the 2.0% treatment group showed an average weight gain of only 24.6 ± 3.8 mg, compared to 59.1 ± 4.2 mg in the control. Additionally, molting delays were evident, with a higher proportion of larvae remaining in the third instar beyond the normal period. Signs of abnormal behavior such as sluggishness, reduced mobility, and partial feeding attempts were frequently observed in higher dose groups (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Larval growth and developmental impact.
Mortality Rates. Although the primary aim was to study behavioral changes, moderate larval mortality was also recorded. Mortality rates increased with concentration, reaching 27% at 2.0% methanol extract after 72 hours. While not acutely toxic at these concentrations, the extract appears to contribute to sub-lethal effects that impair feeding, growth, and survival (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5. Mortality Rates.
Summary of Behavioral Trends. Overall, N. nucifera extracts caused multiple behavioral disruptions in S. litura, including delayed feeding initiation, movement away from treated surfaces, oviposition deterrence, and developmental interference. These effects were consistently dose-dependent and most prominent with the ethyl acetate fraction, indicating the presence of bioactive compounds with antifeedant and behavior-modifying properties (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. Behavioural changes.
DISCUSSION
The present study demonstrates that Nelumbo nucifera extracts, particularly those derived using ethyl acetate, exhibit significant antifeedant and behavioral-modifying effects on Spodoptera litura, a notorious polyphagous pest of numerous economically important crops. The observed feeding deterrence, delayed initiation, and disrupted growth patterns support the hypothesis that N. nucifera contains bioactive phytochemicals capable of interfering with insect herbivory. These findings are consistent with earlier reports of plant-derived antifeedants affecting insect feeding through gustatory deterrence and physiological disruption (Koul, 2016; Thangavel et al., 2014).
The marked reduction in feeding initiation and consumption, especially at higher extract concentrations, suggests that secondary metabolites in N. nucifera may interact with gustatory receptors or influence neurobehavioral pathways of the larvae, causing avoidance responses. This aligns with studies indicating that alkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoids present in medicinal plants can act as potent feeding inhibitors in lepidopteran larvae (Yadav et al., 2020; Mossa et al., 2021). Preliminary phytochemical screenings in this study also support the presence of such compounds in N. nucifera, corroborating previous reports of its insecticidal and medicinal properties (Singh et al., 2017).
The behavioral assays revealed that larvae exposed to extract-treated surfaces exhibited strong avoidance tendencies and spent significantly more time in untreated zones. This behavioral repellency could be attributed to volatiles or surface-active compounds acting through olfactory and contact chemoreception, as seen in other plant-based deterrents such as Azadirachta indica and Ocimum sanctum (Sharma et al., 2019; Ghosh et al., 2023). The oviposition deterrence observed further suggests that N. nucifera has potential not only as a larval feeding deterrent but also as a reproductive disruptor, which could contribute to long-term pest population suppression.
The sublethal effects observed, including stunted growth, delayed molting, and reduced weight gain, indicate physiological stress and potential interference with hormonal or digestive pathways. Such effects have been reported with botanical extracts that inhibit nutrient assimilation or disrupt endocrine signaling in insect pests (Khanday et al., 2022). The moderate larval mortality recorded at higher concentrations, though secondary to behavioral endpoints, enhances the pest management potential of N. nucifera-derived formulations.
These findings are particularly relevant in the context of integrated pest management (IPM), where plant-based compounds offer environmentally safe alternatives to synthetic pesticides. The use of antifeedants can reduce pest damage without exerting strong selective pressure that typically leads to resistance (Isman, 2020). Moreover, N. nucifera’s availability and ease of extraction make it a promising candidate for further development and field application.
However, while laboratory bioassays provide strong evidence of efficacy, further research is required to isolate specific active compounds, understand their modes of action, and validate their effectiveness under field conditions. Challenges such as formulation stability, phytotoxicity, and non-target effects must also be addressed. Moreover, scaling up production in a cost-effective and sustainable manner remains a critical step before commercial deployment (Ali et al., 2019; Rani et al., 2024).
Ahmad, M. & Arif, M. I.
(2009). Resistance of Spodoptera litura
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) against insecticides in Pakistan. Pest Management Science,
65(8), 847–852.
Ali, A., Rizvi, S. Z. H. & Ahmad, S. (2019). Botanical
insecticides: Current trends and future prospects. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry, 67(42), 11773–11790.
Ghosh, D., Prasad, R. & Rao, D. S. (2023). Comparative
evaluation of essential oils as natural insecticides against agricultural
pests. Industrial Crops and Products, 199, 116803.
Isman, M. B. (2006). Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in
modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annual Review of
Entomology, 51, 45–66.
Isman, M. B. (2020). Botanical insecticides in the
twenty-first century – fulfilling their promise? Annual Review of Entomology,
65, 233–249.
Joshi, R., Gaur, N. & Mathpal,
S. (2023a). Biochemical Mechanism of Insecticide
Resistance in Spodoptera litura (F) Populations from Uttarakhand. Indian
Journal of Entomology.
Joshi, R., Gaur, N. & Mathpal,
S. (2023b). Insecticide Resistance Development
and Detoxification Enzyme Activities of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in
Soybean from Kumaon Himalayas. Legume Research, 46(7), 927–933.
Khanday, M. U. D., Ahmad, S. & Khan, M. A. (2022).
Biopesticidal activity of plant extracts on major pests of vegetable crops: A
review. Phytoparasitica, 50(2), 315–330.
Koul, O. (2016). Insect Antifeedants. CRC Press.
Mossa, A. T. H., Mohafrash, S. M. M. & Chandrasekaran,
N. (2021). Current perspectives on the safety and toxicity of essential oils in
pest control. Plants, 10(5), 1040.
Priya, P. & Chakravarty, M. K.
(2025). Efficacy of Chemical and Botanical
Insecticides Against Tobacco Caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)
in Soybean. Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 20(1), 204–207.
Rajkumar, S. & Jebanesan, A.
(2009). Larvicidal and repellent activity
of Nelumbo nucifera leaf extract against Culex quinquefasciatus
Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2(3),
189–192.
Rani, K., Sharma, A. & Paul, S. (2024). Nanoformulations
of plant-derived biopesticides for enhanced efficacy against lepidopteran pests.
Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 195, 105402.
Sharma, N., Tripathi, A. & Mishra, A. (2019). Efficacy
of selected botanicals against lepidopteran pests: A comparative study. Journal
of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 22(4), 1010–1017.
Singh, R., Singh, N., Soni, S. K.,
Singh, R. & Kalra, A. (2012).
Antimicrobial activity of Nelumbo nucifera (Gaertn.) flowers. Indian
Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics, 49(1), 62–65.
Singh, R., Singh, N., Soni, S. K., Singh, R., & Kalra,
A. (2017). Antimicrobial activity of Nelumbo nucifera flowers. Indian
Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics, 54(2), 174–179.
Thangavel, G., Sangeetha, B. &
Murugan, K. (2014). Effect of plant-derived
antifeedants on feeding behavior and nutritional physiology of Spodoptera litura
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science,
34(2), 126–135.
Yadav, P., Yadav, M. & Yadav, A. (2020). Biopesticidal
potential of plant secondary metabolites against lepidopteran pests. Egyptian
Journal of Biological Pest Control, 30(1), 117.