Author:
Tabish Jehan Been1*, Mohammad Amin Mir2, Abdul Raouf Malik3, Sajad Ahmed Bhat4, Sajad Majeed Zargar5, Arshad Hussain Mughal6, Iftisam Yaseen1, Shaila Din1, Aamina Sadiq1 and Nazish Farooq Mir7
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(11): 87-94, 2024
Address:
1Ph.D. Scholar, Division of Fruit Science, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Faculty of Horticulture, Shalimar, Srinagar (J&K), India.
2Professor, Division of Fruit Science, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Faculty of Horticulture, Shalimar, Srinagar (J&K), India.
3Assistant Professor, Division of Fruit Science, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Faculty of Horticulture, Shalimar, Srinagar (J&K), India.
4Professor, Division of Basic Science and Humanities, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Faculty of Horticulture, Shalimar, Srinagar (J&K), India.
5Associate Professor, Division of Plant Biotechnology, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Faculty of Horticulture, Shalimar, Srinagar (J&K), India
6Professor, Associate Director Research, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Faculty of Horticulture, Shalimar, Srinagar (J&K), India.
7M.Sc. Student, Biodiversity Conservation, Division of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, BH125BB, (Bournemouth Dorset, United Kingdom).
(Corresponding author: Tabish Jehan Been*)
DOI: -
russet management, GA3+ 6-BA, GA4+7 +6-BA, physical characters, chlorogenic acid, Red Velox, Golden Clone-B.
Apple with its appealing nature has appeals enchanted the human minds for thousands of years. This fruit still fits the age-old parable that "An apple a day keeps the doctor away". In the world, apple is grown over an area of 47, 17, 384 hectares with an annual production of 8, 72, 36, 221 metric tonnes (Anonymous, 2019a). At the international level, China is leading in the production of apples followed by India and Brazil. In India, it is grown over an area of 3, 08, 000 hectares with an annual production of 23, 16, 000 metric tonnes (Anonymous, 2019b). In India, even though the three leading states in the production of apples are J&K, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, the majority of the crop comes from Jammu and Kashmir. Apple industry is one of the direct sources controlling the economy of the state because of its comparative advantage. Jammu & Kashmir accounts for 67.7% of the total apple production and the production per hectare is 10.0 metric tons, which is higher than the national average (Bhat et al., 2019). Jammu & Kashmir occupies an area of about 1, 64, 742 hectares while the production is 17, 19, 415.69 MT (Anonymous, 2021). One of the economically important disorders that is experienced by many fruit crop species including apples is russeting (Knoche and Lang 2017). Russet is known to impair the shiny appearance of the fruit skin even though it doesn't change its nutritional value. Plant growth hormones have found their use in the fruit production industry for various purposes and at different stages of plant growth. Gibberellic acid (GA4+7) has shown its effect in
reducing the russet of the fruit and improving its skin finish (Leite et al., 2005). The use of cytokinin 6-benzyl adenine (6-BA) at the petal fall stage and four weeks after the petal fall has shown improvement in the typiness of the Red Delicious apples (Cline, 2017). The research conducted on chlorogenic acid has revealed that the upregulated genes associated with it are linked to the biosynthesis of flavonoids while those which are down-regulated are involved in lignin biosynthesis which could be the reason why it stops russeting (Wang et al., 2014). Thus, the current investigation on the two cvs. Red Velox and Golden Clone-B was conducted with an aim to standardize the chemical and its concentration in order to manage russet in the two varieties apart from studying its impact on the fruit physical attributes.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A lot of studies have been conducted on the russeting incidence, characteristics and fruit quality as well. A few of them are as follows: Sanchez et al. (2001) carried out a study on the chemical treatments in "Golden Delicious Spur" fruits in relation to russeting using ProVide, Packhard, Microthiol Special and Dithane which were applied to the apple trees at the onset of flowering, at petal drop, and at the beginning of fruit development. The results reduced the damaged fruit area as well as the percentage of damaged fruits in comparison to control. The application of calcium nitrate and Dithane increased the percentage of the damaged area whereas Packhard resulted in the increase of the fruits with russeting. McArtney et al. (2007) undertook a series of four experiments to evaluate the effects of prohexadione-Ca and GA4+7 mainly on the fruit russet but also on the fruit set, fruit weight, early season shoot growth and fruit maturity of "Golden Delicious" apples. A single application of P-Ca at petal fall reduced the fruit severity of russet in three of the four experiments conducted, however continuous applications of 20 ppm GA4+7 at 10 days intervals resulted in effective russet control. The data led to the conclusion that whereas P-Ca leads to decrease in russet severity, it can have an additive effect when used in combination with GA4+7. Chitu et al. (2009) conducted a study on the apple cultivar Goldspur (grafted on M-26) using Promalin. The treatments were applied four times between June and September, beginning at flowering and continuing at 14 days interval for three treatments. Carbosulf was sprayed three times before harvest at 0.5% concentration. The results showed that the foliar clay application increased the percentage of russeting free fruit from 17% (control) to 23-28%. Carbosulf performed better than the clays (average 38% fruits russeting free), but worse than Promalin, which averaged close to 59% russeted free fruits. Pesteanu (2015) conducted a study on the effect of GA4+7 on the russeting of "Golden Delicious" apples. The treatments given were 4 ppm and 5 ppm which were applied 4 times starting from the petal fall stage and after 7-10 days for the other sprays. It was seen that almost 74% and 61% of fruits sprayed with GA4+7 @ 5 ppm and 4 ppm respectively showed no russet formation. Cline (2017) studied the interactive effects of 6-BA and GA4+7 in a two-year-old experiment on Royal Gala/Bud9 apple trees during bloom and fruit set to reduce russeting and improve their typiness. Four treatments were used which included untreated control and three different concentrations of GA4+7 and 6-BA i.e., 5.5 mg/L, 11 mg /L and 21 mg/L. It was observed that GA4+7/6-BA decreased soluble solids and fruit firmness in the first year, suggesting a delay in fruit maturity. While gibberellic acid was used to reduce skin russet and improve the skin finish, the cytokinin 6-benzyladenine (6-BA) was used at petal fall and four week after that to improve the typiness of the Red delicious apples. The russet rating which was obtained by a spray of GA4+7 + 6-BA in three concentrations i.e., 5.5 ppm, 11 ppm and 21 ppm was 1.9-2.0 on a scale of 0-3. GA4+7 + 6-BA was found to increase fruit typiness and length to diameter ratios. Sharma et al. (2020) conducted a study with various plant growth regulator practices on eight year old apple trees cv. 'Scarlet Spur II'. Application of GA4+7 +BA at 2.5 ppm and 5 ppm when given at petal fall and two times later at 10 days interval recorded minimum russet formation (Score:1.17), increased fruit length (68.93 mm) as well as increased L/D ratio (1.07), TSS and sugar content in apple. however, CPPU at 10 ppm when applied at the petal fall stage recorded higher fruit diameter (70.89 mm), fruit weight (155.56 g), fruit volume (102.94 cc), TSS (10.72 ºBrix), total sugars (9.11%) and reducing sugars (4.87%). Kuchay et al. (2022) carried out a study to know the effect of Applin (gibberellin andcytokinin) on the growth, yield and quality of Royal Delicious apple. The fruits showed maximum fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit weight, yieldand ascorbic acid in those plants that were treated with 0.5 mL/l of Applin and with 1.0 mL/l of Wetcit. The results showed that the application of PGRs at different concentrations greatly affects the fruit size, quality and shelf life of apples during the year of high crop load. Bhat et al. (2022) carried out a study to determine the response of Promalin on the growth of apple cv. Red Delicious. The study shows that the growth of apple fruit was significantly influenced by Promalin (GA4+7 and 6-BA). The results showed that the longest fruit length of 71.06 mm was recorded with 60 ppm Promalin which was at par with 30 ppm, 90 ppm and 100 ppm whereas the control (Water spray) had a fruit length of 60.52 mm and was found to be a significantly different from all the treatments. The results also showed a fruit breadth of 70.70 mm with 90 ppm Promalin application and it was found to be at par with 60 ppm Promalin application. The least breadth was however shown by the control (Water spray) where it was 61.34 mm. Fruit colour was found to be maximum where the concentrations of the chemical were low and in untreated fruits as compared to high concentrations. Apart from that, with the increase in the concentration of Promalin, the fruits developed a long conical shape. In those fruits where the concentration of Promalin was phytotoxic, around 12.67% russetting in treated fruits was found. Pramanick et al. (2022) carried out a research on the effect of Promalin on growth and yield parameters of the apple cultivars "Royal delicious" in humid subtemperate zones of Himachal Pradesh, and they concluded that "Promalin" @ 60 ppm as foliar spray at full bloom stage on apple cultivar "Royal Delicious" has a significant impact on the fruit size, shape, fruit yield and other yield contributing traits and had no phytotoxicity in apple. Promalin @ 60 ppm and its double dose @ 90 ppm applied as a foliar spray showed no phytotoxic effect on apple trees at all the intervals of observations. Ates et al. (2023) carried out a study to determine the physical properties, biochemical and bioactive compounds of different apple cultivars including 'Scarlet Spur', 'Starking Delicious', 'Starkrimson Delicious', 'Golden Delicious', and 'Super Chief. The results showed the highest fruit weight (289.96 gm) and fruit length (32.61 mm) from "Scarlet Spur". The highest fruit diameter (34.86 mm) was seen in 'Scarlet Spur' and 'Starkrimson Delicious'.
Five year old trees of exotic apple cvs. “Red Velox” and “Golden Clone-B” grafted on M-9 T337 rootstock, introduced by SKUAST-Kashmir from Holland in March 2017 were selected for experimental studies. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (two factorial) and was conducted in the year 2022-2023 respectively. The first factor was the russet management chemicals which include G0: Control, G1: GA4+7 +6-BA @ 5.5 ppm, G2: GA4+7+6-BA @ 11 ppm, G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm, G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5 ppm, G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm, G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm, G7: GA3+ 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm, G8: GA3+ 6-BA @ 11 ppm and G9: GA3+ 6-BA @ 21 ppm. The second factor was the varieties i.e., Red Velox and Golden Clone-B. Timing of the spray was @ 80% petal fall and 15 days after the first spray for all the treatments comprising of GA4+7 +6-BA and GA3 + 6-BA. It was 30 days after the full bloom for Chlorogenic acid.
For calculating the fruit length and fruit diameter, random samples from the experimental units of both the varieties were measured separately with a digital vernier caliper in millimeters (mm) and the fruit length and fruit diameter was averaged and analyzed statistically. The L/D ratio was estimated by dividing the length of the fruit by the diameter of the corresponding fruit. For measuring the fruit weight, the random samples from the experimental units of both varieties were weighed on a sensitive monopan electronic balance, averaged and recorded in grams (g). Fruit firmness was measured using the Effegi penetrometer model: 53205 having 7/16 diameter of the head with penetration of 5/6. In each replication, fruits were punched at three different places on their surface after removing about one square inch of peel and firmness was recorded as kg/cm2. The observations recorded during the investigation were subjected to statistical analysis according to the method of ‘Analysis of Variance’ (Gomez and Gomez 1984). The significance and non-significance of treatment effects were judged with the help of the software CPCS. The effects of the treatments were tested at a 5 percent level of significance.
Table 1: Effect of various russet management chemicals on fruit length (mm) of apple cvs. Red Velox and Golden Clone-B.
2022 | 2023 | Pooled | ||||||||
Varieties Treatments | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | |
G0: Control | 62.61 | 71.65 | 67.13 | 62.13 | 72.61 | 67.37 | 63.11 | 72.17 | 67.64 | |
G1: GA4+7+ 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 66.51 | 74.63 | 70.57 | 68.28 | 75.53 | 71.90 | 67.39 | 75.08 | 71.23 | |
G2: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 69.24 | 77.55 | 73.39 | 70.31 | 78.46 | 74.39 | 69.77 | 78.07 | 73.89 | |
G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 71.55 | 79.46 | 75.51 | 72.42 | 80.33 | 76.37 | 71.98 | 79.89 | 75.94 | |
G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5ppm | 62.63 | 71.66 | 67.15 | 62.38 | 72.64 | 67.65 | 63.13 | 72.21 | 67.67 | |
G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm | 62.66 | 71.70 | 67.18 | 63.66 | 72.61 | 67.99 | 63.18 | 72.20 | 67.69 | |
G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm | 62.83 | 71.89 | 67.36 | 63.73 | 72.79 | 68.26 | 63.28 | 72.24 | 67.76 | |
G7: GA3 + 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 65.48 | 73.64 | 69.56 | 67.42 | 74.58 | 71.00 | 66.45 | 74.11 | 70.28 | |
G8: GA3 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 68.64 | 75.60 | 72.12 | 69.50 | 76.79 | 73.14 | 69.06 | 76.19 | 72.63 | |
G9: GA3 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 71.15 | 78.79 | 74.97 | 71.48 | 79.66 | 74.57 | 69.81 | 79.23 | 74.52 | |
Mean | 66.33 | 74.65 | 67.13 | 75.60 | 66.71 | 75.13 | ||||
C.D.(< 0.05) | C.D. (2022) | C.D. (2023) | Pooled | |||||||
Russet management chemicals (G) | 0.250 | 0.199 | 0.194 | |||||||
Varieties (V) | 0.112 | 0.089 | 0.087 | |||||||
G x V | 0.354 | 0.281 | 0.274 | |||||||
Table 2: Effect of various russet management chemicals on fruit diameter (mm) of apple cvs. Red Velox and Golden Clone-B.
2022 | 2023 | Pooled | ||||||||
Varieties Treatments | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | |
G0: Control | 70.03 | 74.62 | 72.32 | 70.46 | 74.68 | 72.57 | 70.24 | 74.27 | 72.25 | |
G1: GA4+7+ 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 74.05 | 76.07 | 75.06 | 74.94 | 75.46 | 75.20 | 74.20 | 76.26 | 75.23 | |
G2: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 74.85 | 78.25 | 76.55 | 75.52 | 78.75 | 77.14 | 75.18 | 78.50 | 76.84 | |
G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 76.85 | 79.54 | 78.19 | 77.31 | 79.78 | 78.54 | 77.08 | 79.65 | 78.36 | |
G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5ppm | 70.06 | 74.63 | 72.35 | 70.46 | 74.90 | 72.69 | 70.26 | 74.77 | 72.25 | |
G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm | 70.06 | 74.68 | 72.37 | 70.51 | 74.93 | 72.72 | 70.27 | 74.78 | 72.52 | |
G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm | 70.22 | 74.80 | 72.51 | 70.72 | 74.94 | 72.81 | 70.47 | 74.98 | 72.72 | |
G7: GA3 + 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 73.81 | 75.29 | 74.55 | 74.29 | 75.18 | 74.73 | 74.05 | 75.51 | 74.78 | |
G8: GA3 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 74.35 | 77.15 | 75.75 | 75.24 | 76.46 | 75.85 | 74.93 | 76.80 | 75.86 | |
G9: GA3 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 75.57 | 79.02 | 77.29 | 76.09 | 79.48 | 77.78 | 75.82 | 79.25 | 77.53 | |
Mean | 72.98 | 76.40 | 73.55 | 76.45 | 73.25 | 76.47 | ||||
C.D.(< 0.05) | C.D. (2022) | C.D. (2023) | Pooled | |||||||
Russet management chemicals (G) | 0.236 | 0.276 | 0.221 | |||||||
Varieties (V) | 0.105 | 0.123 | 0.099 | |||||||
G x V | 0.333 | 0.390 | 0.312 | |||||||
Table 3: Effect of various russet management chemicals on fruit length/diameter ratio of apple cvs. Red Velox and Golden Clone-B
2022 | 2023 | Pooled | ||||||||
Varieties Treatments | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | |
G0: Control | 0.893 | 0.959 | 0.927 | 0.881 | 0.972 | 0.928 | 0.897 | 0.963 | 0.931 | |
G1: GA4+7+ 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 0.898 | 0.981 | 0.940 | 0.911 | 1.000 | 0.956 | 0.908 | 0.984 | 0.946 | |
G2: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 0.925 | 0.991 | 0.958 | 0.931 | 0.996 | 0.964 | 0.928 | 0.994 | 0.961 | |
G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 0.931 | 0.998 | 0.965 | 0.936 | 1.006 | 0.972 | 0.933 | 1.003 | 0.969 | |
G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5ppm | 0.890 | 0.959 | 0.928 | 0.888 | 0.969 | 0.930 | 0.898 | 0.964 | 0.931 | |
G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm | 0.894 | 0.961 | 0.930 | 0.899 | 0.969 | 0.935 | 0.899 | 0.965 | 0.931 | |
G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm | 0.894 | 0.960 | 0.931 | 0.901 | 0.971 | 0.937 | 0.898 | 0.966 | 0.932 | |
G7: GA3 + 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 0.887 | 0.978 | 0.933 | 0.907 | 0.992 | 0.950 | 0.897 | 0.981 | 0.939 | |
G8: GA3 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 0.923 | 0.979 | 0.952 | 0.923 | 1.004 | 0.964 | 0.921 | 0.992 | 0.957 | |
G9: GA3 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 0.941 | 0.997 | 0.969 | 0.939 | 1.002 | 0.958 | 0.920 | 0.999 | 0.961 | |
Mean | 0.908 | 0.976 | 0.912 | 0.988 | 0.910 | 0.982 | ||||
C.D.(< 0.05) | C.D. (2022) | C.D. (2023) | Pooled | |||||||
Russet management chemicals (G) | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.003 | |||||||
Varieties (V) | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||||
G x V | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.004 | |||||||
Table 4: Effect of various russet management chemicals on fruit weight (g) of apple cvs. Red Velox and Golden Clone-B.
2022 | 2023 | Pooled | |||||||
Varieties Treatments | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean |
G0: Control | 179.75 | 204.19 | 191.97 | 176.79 | 199.27 | 188.03 | 178.27 | 201.77 | 190.02 |
G1: GA4+7+ 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 195.12 | 211.15 | 203.13 | 189.46 | 206.24 | 197.85 | 192.38 | 208.75 | 200.56 |
G2: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 201.24 | 217.44 | 209.34 | 197.55 | 213.25 | 205.40 | 199.39 | 215.36 | 207.37 |
G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 204.87 | 223.51 | 214.29 | 205.32 | 220.46 | 212.89 | 205.04 | 222.12 | 213.58 |
G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5ppm | 180.58 | 204.12 | 192.35 | 176.73 | 200.43 | 188.58 | 178.61 | 202.25 | 190.43 |
G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm | 180.39 | 205.63 | 193.01 | 177.41 | 199.52 | 188.46 | 178.87 | 202.54 | 190.70 |
G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm | 181.56 | 204.86 | 193.21 | 178.44 | 200.51 | 189.47 | 179.95 | 202.77 | 191.36 |
G7: GA3 + 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 192.85 | 210.15 | 201.50 | 183.57 | 203.20 | 193.38 | 188.26 | 206.68 | 197.47 |
G8: GA3 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 198.74 | 213.64 | 206.19 | 193.78 | 209.21 | 201.49 | 196.23 | 211.49 | 203.86 |
G9: GA3 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 203.02 | 221.17 | 212.09 | 200.04 | 217.42 | 208.73 | 201.54 | 219.33 | 210.43 |
Mean | 191.81 | 211.58 | 187.90 | 206.95 | 189.85 | 209.30 | |||
C.D.(< 0.05) | C.D. (2022) | C.D. (2023) | Pooled | ||||||
Russet management chemicals (G) | 1.783 | 2.405 | 2.001 | ||||||
Varieties (V) | 0.797 | 1.887 | 1.217 | ||||||
G x V | 2.522 | 2.678 | 3.850 | ||||||
Table 5: Effect of various russet management chemicals on fruit firmness (kg/cm2) of apple cvs. Red Velox and Golden Clone-B.
2022 | 2023 | Pooled | ||||||||
Varieties Treatments | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | Red Velox | Golden Clone-B | Mean | |
G0: Control | 8.21 | 7.21 | 7.71 | 8.42 | 7.42 | 7.92 | 8.31 | 6.81 | 7.56 | |
G1: GA4+7+ 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 7.93 | 6.92 | 7.42 | 8.14 | 7.12 | 7.63 | 8.01 | 7.01 | 7.51 | |
G2: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 7.73 | 6.71 | 7.22 | 8.00 | 6.95 | 7.48 | 7.82 | 6.81 | 7.31 | |
G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 7.53 | 6.52 | 7.02 | 7.72 | 6.72 | 7.22 | 7.61 | 6.6 | 7.11 | |
G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5ppm | 8.14 | 7.14 | 7.64 | 8.35 | 7.32 | 7.83 | 8.21 | 7.21 | 7.71 | |
G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm | 7.53 | 6.52 | 7.02 | 7.72 | 6.72 | 7.22 | 7.61 | 6.61 | 7.11 | |
G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm | 8.33 | 7.32 | 7.82 | 8.52 | 7.52 | 8.02 | 8.41 | 7.41 | 7.91 | |
G7: GA3 + 6-BA @ 5.5 ppm | 8.04 | 7.13 | 7.58 | 8.27 | 7.22 | 7.74 | 8.11 | 7.16 | 7.64 | |
G8: GA3 + 6-BA @ 11 ppm | 7.84 | 6.83 | 7.33 | 8.02 | 7.02 | 7.52 | 7.91 | 6.91 | 7.41 | |
G9: GA3 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm | 7.62 | 6.63 | 7.12 | 7.81 | 6.83 | 7.32 | 7.71 | 6.71 | 7.21 | |
Mean | 7.89 | 6.89 | 8.09 | 7.08 | 7.97 | 6.92 | ||||
C.D.(< 0.05) | C.D. (2022) | C.D. (2023) | Pooled | |||||||
Russet management chemicals (G) | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.006 | |||||||
Varieties (V) | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | |||||||
G x V | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.009 | |||||||
Russet represents the incorporation of suberin (which has suberized secondary skin which is linked to a triterpenoid i.e., betulinic acid) (Falginella et al., 2021) into the cell walls of phellem, which are formed by the division of phellogen, which inturn forms the source of the periderm. It starts with the formation of microcracks in the cuticle which if shallow get filled up by the wax, or otherwise travel through its thickness and affect the osmotic potential of the cuticle. The cracks that get deep enter into the epidermis and begin to form in the hypodermis. Subsequently, the epidermis dries away exposing the periderm at the fruit surface. This series of events is known as russeting and is highly susceptible during the early stages of fruit development (Khanal et al., 2020). Whereas exposure to longer periods of surface wetness/high humidity amounts to russet in the susceptible cultivars, the application of GA4+7 reduces the incidence of it (Ginzberg and Stern 2016).
Firstly, it is responsible for reducing the size of epidermal cells and making them more uniform (Curry, 2012). The skin that contains smaller epidermal cells is mechanically more sound, which provides structural support to the cuticle. This also decreases the stress concentrations which otherwise result in microcracking. Also, GA has been known to reduce moisture-induced microcracking in russet-susceptible “Golden Delicious” varieties. However, its spray doesn’t have an impact on the cuticle mass, wax content or mechanical strength of the isolated apple fruit cuticle (Knoche et al., 2011). In some sprays, it has been seen that often GA is sprayed in combination with cytokinin, benzyl adenine (BA) which is believed to be responsible for offsetting certain adverse effects that GA may have on flowering (McLaughlin and Greene 1984).
Chlorogenic acid, meanwhile is known to affect the enzyme activities and regulate the expression of the phenylpropanoid pathway. Similarly, it has been seen to affect the secondary metabolism of apple peels which is related with the russet formation (Wang et al., 2014). As reported by Wang et al. (2014), chlorogenic acid increases the levels of chlorogenic acid and total flavonoids, but inhibits the lignin accumulation in the apple peels. This suggests that its treatment results in an up-regulation of the whole metabolism of phenylpropanoids, but results in the down-regulation of lignin biosynthesis.
A significant effect of the russet management chemicals was seen on the fruit length, fruit diameter, l/d ratio and fruit weight (Tables 2-5). A significant impact of the russet management chemicals was found on the fruit length (mm) as well and the varietal impact was found to be significant. Maximum fruit length (75.94 mm) was obtained in G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm which was followed by G9: GA3+6-BA @ 21 ppm (74.52 mm). Minimum fruit length (67.64 mm) was obtained in G0: Control during the years 2022 and 2023 respectively. It was found to be statistically at par with G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5 ppm (67.67 mm), G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm (67.69 mm) and G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm (67.76 mm) in both the years. With respect to the varietal impact which was also found to be significant, maximum fruit length was recorded in Golden Clone-B (75.13 mm) while as minimum fruit length was recorded in Red Velox (66.71 mm). Similarly, maximum fruit diameter (78.36 mm) was obtained in G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm which was followed by G9: GA3+6-BA @ 21 ppm (77.53 mm). Minimum fruit diameter (72.25 mm) was obtained in G0: Control during the years 2022 and 2023 respectively. It was found to be statistically at par with G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5 ppm (72.25mm), G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm (72.52 mm) and G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm (72.72mm) in both the years. With respect to the varietal impact which was also found to be significant, maximum fruit diameter was recorded in Golden Clone-B (76.47 mm) while as minimum fruit diameter was recorded in Red Velox (73.25 mm).
Similarly, maximum fruit L/D ratio (0.969) was obtained in G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm which was followed by G9: GA3+6-BA @ 21 ppm (0.961). Minimum fruit L/D ratio (0.931) was obtained in G0: Control during the years 2022 and 2023 respectively. It was found to be statistically at par with G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5 ppm (0.931), G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm (0.931) and G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm (0.932) in both the years. With respect to the varietal impact which was also found to be significant, maximum fruit L/D ratio was recorded in Golden Clone-B (0.982) while as minimum fruit L/D ratio was recorded in Red Velox (0.910). With respect to the fruit weight, maximum fruit weight ratio (213.58 gm) was obtained in G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm which was followed by G9: GA3+6-BA @ 21 ppm (210.43 gm). Minimum fruit weight (190.02 gm) was obtained in G0: Control during the years 2022 and 2023 respectively. It was found to be statistically at par with G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5 ppm (190.43 gm), G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm (190.70 gm) and G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm (191.36 gm) in both the years.With respect to the varietal impact which was also found to be significant, maximum fruit weight was recorded in Golden Clone-B (209.30 gm) while as minimum fruit weight was recorded in Red Velox (189.85 gm). Increase in fruit length, fruit diameter, l/d ratio and fruit weight can be attributed to the application of gibberellin. This is because, GA4+7, increases the fruit size and results in changing the shape of the fruit. The length/width ratio gets increased particularly in the calyx region, due to which the fruit gets extended calyx lobes. On the other hand, if BA is applied alone, it causes an increase in russeting for which there is no specified reason. Also, as reported by (Greene, 2012), the amount of russet reduction due to GA4+7 + 6-BA decreases the russet only to the same amount as that of GA4+7 itself (Greene, 2012). Similar results were suggested by Sharma et al. (2018) in which the authors concluded that GA4+7 + 6-BA when applied thrice is responsible not only for increasing the fruit shape index (L/D ratio) but is also effective in reducing the russet formation. Kuchay et al. (2021) also showed that the increase in fruit length, fruit diameter and fruit weight with the application of Applin (combination of gibberellin and cytokinin). Benzyladenine, which is a cytokinin, also increases fruit weight and size independently by increasing the cell division. These results were in coordination with Link (2000) who found that BA causes an increase in the fruit size even in the absence of fruit thinning. Liu et al. (2022), who carried out a study on self-pollinated “Hanfu” apples, found that the external application of gibberellic acid not only increased the fruit weight but also lowered the proportion of asymmetrical fruit, at the same time increasing the wax layer thickness and reducing the fruit water loss rate. Also, a reason for the difference in Golden Clone-B having more fruit length, diameter and l/d ratio than Red Velox would be because of these being their varietal characters. Similar results were recorded by Karsi and Aslantas (2016).
A significant impact of the russet management chemicals was found on fruit firmness as well as the varietal impact was found to be significant. Maximum fruit firmness (7.11 kg/cm2) was obtained in G3: GA4+7 + 6-BA @ 21 ppm which was followed by G9: GA3+6-BA @ 21 ppm (7.21 kg/cm2). Minimum fruit firmness (7.56 kg/cm2) was obtained in G0: Control during the years 2022 and 2023 respectively. It was found to be statistically at par with G4: Chlorogenic acid @ 88.5 ppm (7.71 kg/cm2), G5: Chlorogenic acid @ 177 ppm (7.11 kg/cm2) and G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm (7.91 kg/cm2) in both the years. With respect to the varietal impact which was also found to be significant, maximum fruit firmness was recorded in Red Velox (7.97 kg/cm2) while as minimum fruit firmness was recorded in Golden Clone-B (6.92 kg/cm2).
The reason for the highest fruit firmness in G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm and G0: Control, would have been probably because of the reason that the water vapour permeance of the russeted area/skin of the fruit is higher than that of the non russeted area. This higher water vapour permeance results in increase in the water loss from the apple skin resulting in a higher mass loss and a more shrivelled appearance (Winkler et al., 2022). This in turn means, that more the russeted surface of the fruit, more will be the water loss, and hence, more will be the firmness and less will be the fruit weight (Marchioretto et al., 2018). Considering the varietal impact of fruit firmness, maximum fruit firmness was recorded for Red Velox while as minimum fruit firmness was recorded for Golden Clone-B. This might be because of Red Velox being stronger and more firm than Golden Clone-B as its varietal character. Another factor which contributes to the fruit firmness is calcium pectate which maintains the membrane integrity of the cell walls and it has also a role in the binding the complex polysaccharides and proteins which in turn form the cell wall (Sadiq et al., 2023). It was found to be maximum in G6: Chlorogenic acid @ 354 ppm and G0: Control. Also, as much as the size of the cells increases, there is a decrease in the firmness as well. This is mostly brought about by an increase in the size of the vacuole during the cell enlargement phase which occupies a large portion of the cell space (Din, 2019). Marchioretto et al. (2018) observed that flesh firmness is negatively correlated with mean fruit weight. This might be the reason that minimum fruit firmness was found in G0: Control while maximum fruit firmness was found in G6: Chlorogenic acid. Similar results were recorded by Jemric et al. (2003); Ali et al. (2023).
Ali, M. T., Mehraj, S., Mir, M. S., Shah, I. A., Shah, Z. A., El-Serehy, H. A., Dar, E.A., Bhat, A. H., Wani, S.A., Fayaz, U. and Al-Misned, F. A. (2023). Deciphering the response of thirteen apple cultivars for growth, fruit morphology and fruit physico-chemical attributes during different years. Heliyon, 9(6), 2-19.
Anonymous (2019a). FAO, 2019. Food and Agricultural Organization. Statistical Database on World Fruit Production. www.fao.org.
Anonymous (2019b). Indian Horticulture Database 2019, National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India.
Anonymous (2021). Production and Area statement for 2020-21. Department of Horticulture Jammu and Kashmir Government.
Ates, U., Ozturk, B., and Serkan, U. Z. U. N. 2023. Bioactive Contents and Fruit Traits of Some Apple Cultivars Grown in Kayseri. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 6(5), 533-538.
Bhat, M. S., Lone, F. A., Shafiq, M. and Rather, J. A. (2019). Evaluation of long term trends in apple cultivation and its productivity in Jammu and Kashmir from 1975 to 2015. Geo Journal, 86(3), 1193-1202.
Bhat, Z. A., Rather, T. R., Javeed, K., Itoo, H. U., Khursheed, S., Rather, G. H., Nisar, S., Bhat, S. A. and Ayaz, Q. (2022). Effect of Promalin on physical attributes of apple cv. Red Delicious. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(6), 1114-1116.
Chitu, V., Chitu, E., Marin, F. C., Ionita, A. D., Filipescu, L. and Pirlea, M. (2009). Studies of foliar applied clay effects on the apple fruit quality. In: XI International Symposium on Plant Bioregulators in Fruit Production, 884(1), 441-447.
Cline, J. A. (2017). Interactive effects of 6-BA, GA4+ 7, and prohexadione-calcium on Gala apples. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 97(4), 632-644.
Curry, E. (2012). Increase in epidermal planar cell density accompanies decreased russeting of ‘Golden Delicious’ apples treated with gibberellins A4+ 7. HortScience, 47(2), 232-237.
Din, S., Wani, R. A., Nisar, F., Farwah, S., Rizvi, S., Wani, T. F., and Nisar, S. (2019). Fruit set and development: Pre-requisites and enhancement in temperate fruit crops. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(2), 1203-1216.
Falginella, L., Andre, C. M., Legay, S., Lin-Wang, K., Dare, A. P., Deng, C., Rebstock, R., Plunkett, B. J., Guo, L., Cipriani, G. and Espley, R. V. (2021). Differential regulation of triterpene biosynthesis induced by an early failure in cuticle formation in apple. Horticulture Research, 8(1), 75.
Ginzberg, I., and Stern, R. A. (2016). Strengthening fruit-skin resistance to growth strain by application of plant growth regulators. Scientia Horticulture, 198(1), 150-153.
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd edition). John Willey and Sons, New York, USA pp. 28-92.
Greene, D. W. (2012). Influence of abscisic acid and benzyladenine on fruit set and fruit quality of ‘Bartlett’ pears. Hort Science, 47(11), 1607-1611.
Jemric, T., Pavicic, N., Blaskovic, D., Krapac, M., and Pavicic, D. (2003). The effect of hand and chemical fruit thinning on ‘Golden Delicious cl B’ apple fruit quality. Current studies of biotechnology, 3(1), 193-198.
Karsi, T., and Aslantas R. (2016). Determination of phenological, pomological and chemical characteristics of some apple (Malus communis L.). Ataturk University Faculty of Agricultural Journal, 47(1), 11–21.
Khanal, B. P., Le, T. L., Si, Y., and Knoche, M. (2020). Russet susceptibility in apple is associated with skin cells that are larger, more variable in size, and of reduced fracture strain. Plants, 9(9), 1118.
Knoche, M., Khanal, B. P., and Stopar, M. (2011). Russeting and microcracking of ‘Golden Delicious’ apple fruit concomitantly decline due to gibberellin A4+7 application. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 136(3), 159-164.
Knoche, M. and Lang, A. (2017). Ongoing growth challenges fruit skin integrity. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 36(3), 190–215.
Kuchay, M. A., Jailani, A. W., Banyal, A. K., and Goswami, M. (2021). Effect of plant growth regulator, applin on growth, yield and quality of royal delicious apple. International Journal of Farm Sciences, 11(4), 55-60.
Leite, G. B., Petri, J. L. and Basso, C. (2005). Promalin Effect on Imperial Gala and Fuji Apple Trees Fructification. In: X International Symposium on Plant Bioregulators in Fruit Production, 727(1), 269-278.
Link, H. (2000). Significance of flower and fruit thinning on fruit quality. Plant growth regulation, 31(1), 17-26.
Liu, C., Xiao, P., Jiang, F., Wang, S., Liu, Z., Song, G., and Li, T. (2022). Exogenous gibberellin treatment improves fruit quality in self-pollinated apple. Plant physiology and Biochemistry, 174(5), 11-21.
Marchioretto, L. D. R., De Rossi, A., Michelon, M. F., Orlandi, J. C., and do Amaral, L. O. (2018). Ammonium thiosulfate as a flowering thinner in 'Maxi Gala' apple trees. Brazilian Agricultural Research, 53(10), 1132-1139.
McArtney, S., Obermiller, J. D., and Green, A. (2007). Prohexadione-Ca Reduces Russet and Does Not Negate the Efficacy of GA4+7 Sprays for Russet Control on ‘Golden Delicious’ Apples. Hort Science horts, 42(3), 550 -554.
McLaughlin, J. M., and Greene, D. W. (1984). Effects of BA, GA4+7, and daminozide on fruit set, fruit quality, vegetative growth, flower initiation, and flower quality of 'Golden Delicious' apple.
Pe-teanu, A. (2015). Effect of Application with Gibberellin GA4+7 on russeting of Golden Delicious apples. Bulletin UASVM Horticulture,72(2), 2015.
Pramanick, K. K., Shukla, A. K., Watpade, S., Kumar, J., Kumar, J., and Patial, M. (2022). Effect of promalin on growth and yield parameters of apple cultivar "Royal Delicious" in humid subtemperate zone of Himachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 40(3-4), 349-353.
Sadiq, A., Mir, M. A., Din, S., and Been, T. J. (2023). Influence of Nutrient Sprays on Yield and Fruit Quality Attributes of Apple under High Density Plantation var. Gala Redlum. Biological Forum- An International Journal, 15(12), 485-489.
Sanchez, E., Soto, J. M., Uvalle, J. X., Hernandez, A. P., Ruiz, J. M., and Romero, L. (2001). Chemical treatments in “Golden Delicious spur” fruits in relation to russeting and nutritional status. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 24(1), 191-202.
Sharma, S., Sharma, N., Sharma, D. P., and Chauhan, N. (2018). Effect of plant growth regulators on fruit set, yield efficiency, fruit size and russet formation in apple cv. scarlet spur II. International Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences, 6(3), 692-698.
Sharma, S., Sharma, N., Sharma, D. P. and Chauhan, N. (2020). Effects of GA4+7 + BA and CPPU on russeting and fruit quality in apple (Malus× domestica). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90 (4), 746–749.
Wang, L. J., Li, J. H., Gao, J. J., Feng, X. X., Shi, Z. X., Gao, F. Y., Xu, X.L., and Yang, L. Y. (2014). Inhibitory effect of chlorogenic acid on fruit russeting in ‘Golden Delicious’ apple. Scientia Horticulture, 178(4), 14-22.
Tabish Jehan Been, Mohammad Amin Mir, Abdul Raouf Malik, Sajad Ahmed Bhat, Sajad Majeed Zargar, Arshad Hussain Mughal, Iftisam Yaseen, Shaila Din, Aamina Sadiq and Nazish Farooq Mir (2024). Fruit Physical Attributes as Affected by Russet Management Chemicals in cvs. Red Velox and Golden Clone-B. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(11): 87-94.