Genetic Diversity and Morphological Characterization Studies in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]

Author:

Sneha Rathore1*, Arjun Lal Ola1, Manju Verma2, Anita Choudhary3 and Sonu Kumari3

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(7): 216-220, 2024

Address:

1Department of Horticulture, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh), India.

2Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Nagaur, Agriculture University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India.

3Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Agriculture University Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India.

(Corresponding author: Sneha Rathore*)

DOI: -

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

The current study was implemented during the kharif 2022 at Vegetable Research Farm of Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. The experimental material comprises 30 bottle gourd genotypes. Which were planted in three replications using a randomized block strategy in order to measure genetic progress, heritability, genetic variability and genetic diversity within the genotypes.  Observation for all the parameters was recorded in three selected plants of each treatment. The experiment's analysis of variance revealed incredibly substantial variations between each of the 30 genotypes for every character and also a wide range of mean values among the genotypes for different characters under study were observed. A very high magnitude of GCV and PCV was recorded for fruit length (cm), fruit width (cm) and yield per plant (Kg). Low or insignificant difference between GCV and PCV was recorded for most of the traits indicated that the investigated traits were less impacted by environment. High heritability combined with high genetic advance was recorded for days to first flowering bud, fruit length, fruit weight, number of fruits per plant, fruit width, yield per plant, total soluble solids, protein content and ascorbic acid content. Based on (D2) statistics, thirty genotypes with comparable features were sorted into five substantially diverse clusters. Grouping of genotypes into different diverse clusters showed considerable amount of diversity among the genotypes. 

Keywords

Variability, Heritability, Diversity, Genetic advance, cluster analysis.


Introduction

Cucurbits are one of the widely growing vegetable crops consisting large number of cultivated species. One of the significant members of this family with the most genetic diversity in fruit morphological characteristics is the bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), which has chromosomal number 2n = 22. In different regions of India, it is also known by the names Calabash, Doodhi and Lauki (Gurcan et al., 2015). 

Bottle gourd is one of the earliest vegetable crop that was cultivated for human consumption. In addition to offering food and medicine, bottle gourds are also used to make a wide range of tools and instruments including bowls, bottles, containers, floats for fishing nets (Patel et al., 2023). The bottle gourd is found in South Africa and India in its wild form and is said to have originated in Africa and America (Srivastava et al., 2014). The critical and initial steps in any crop development programme are the collection, preservation, and evaluation of germplasm. An effective breeding programme must be created with a enhanced comprehension of the type and level of genetic diversity contained in the breeding material (Engels and Ebert 2021).

Comprehensive biological knowledge and a grasp of genetic diversity for yield and its constituent parts are required for the implementation of an intense breeding and improvement programme (Damor et al., 2017). The existence of genetic variability, the way in which economic traits are passed down through the generations, heritability, the type of gene action, and the relative magnitude of additive and dominance as well as the overall genotypic and phenotypic variance of the population must all be thoroughly understood. Considering the availability of genetic variability, there is scope of yield and quality improvement and thereby develop export potential of bottlegourd.

Genetic diversity among germplasm is important for genetic development of any crop since it makes it allows to detect the most divergent parents on the basis of  contribution of various qualitative and quantitative parameters (Sohi et al., 2021).Which can be utilized in any hybridization programme. To determine which genotypes are optimal for a breeding population, genetic diversity in the germplasm must be evaluated (Goyal and Bisen 2017).

Material & Methods

The current study was implemented during the kharif 2022 in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications at Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. RLBCAU is situated in the Bundelkhand agro-climatic zone (6) of Uttar Pradesh. The experimental site is situated at 25.30° N latitude and 78.32° E longitude at an altitude of 227 m above MSL. The experimental material comprises 30 bottle gourd genotypes, which is collected from different sources and the genotypes are laid out in 3 × 3 m plot size with the spacing of 0.6 m between each 5 plants in a plot. 

Three randomly chosen plants from each genotype were used to record the observations for 15 distinct features viz., vine length (cm), days to first flowering bud, node number to first male flower appearance, node number to first female flower appearance, days to first fruit setting, days to first fruit picking, number of fruits per plant, fruit length (cm), fruit width (cm), average fruit weight(g), yield per plant (Kg), yield per ha(q), fruit shape, protein content(mg/100g), total soluble solid (obrix) and ascorbic acid content (mg/100g). TSS content was recorded by Hand Refractometer, Protein content was calculated by Kjeldahl method and Ascorbic acid content was calculated by 2, 6-dichlorophenol indophenol titration method (Ranganna, 1986).

Analysis of variance was computed for statistical analysis using the method outlined by Panse and Sukhatme (1967). GCV and PCV were computed according to Burton and De Vane (1953), Heritability broad sense was calculated by the formula given by Lush (1949); Burton and De Vane (1953) and genetic gain was calculated utilizing the formula proposed by Johnson et al. (1955); Lush (1949). The D2 statistic was developed by Mahalanobis (1936) is a helpful tool for evaluating genetic divergence among crop varieties.

Results & Discussion

A. Analysis of variance

The experiment's analysis of variance revealed extremely significant variations among the 30 genotypes for every trait under study (Table 2). The highly significant mean sum of squares was recorded for the traits viz., vine length, days to first flowering bud, node number to first male flower appearance, node number to first female flower appearance, days to first fruit setting, days to first fruit picking, number of fruits per plant, fruit length, fruit width, average fruit weight, yield per plant, yield per hectare, total soluble solid, protein content and ascorbic acid content, revealed significant difference for all the parameters, indicating sufficient amount of variation among all the germplasm for all parameters under the study. Kumar et al. (2021); Singh et al. (2021); Venkatraman (2021); Rashid et al. (2020); Ahmad et al. (2019); Chikkeri et al. (2018) also recorded a very high significant differences among the bottle gourd genotypes with respect to most of the parameters under their studies. The results suggested existence of adequate degree of variation between the experimental material and hence, create more scope for development of desired characters through selection in bottle gourd.

B. Genetic parameters

Higher magnitude of GCV and PCV was noted for fruit length (cm), fruit width (cm) and yield per plant (Kg), which demonstrating the existence of a broad range of genetic variability for these characteristics in the germplasm. Additionally, Studies revealed that these characteristics have a wide genetic base, little environmental effect, and are governed by additive genes, indicating that there is considerable potential for further evolution of these traits through selection. Similar results were also published by Kumar et al. (2021). The moderate level of PCV and GCV for days to first flowering bud, vine length (cm), node number to first male flower appearance, number of fruits per plant, node number to first female flower appearance, average fruit weight, days to first fruit picking, protein content (mg/100g), total soluble solid (°Brix) and ascorbic acid content (mg/100g) indicated moderate variation between the genotypes under study for these vegetative traits in bottle gourd, which indicated that the phenotypic-based selection will be trustworthy since the investigated traits were less impacted by environment (Table 3).

High heritability combined with high genetic advance was recorded for fruit length (cm), number of fruits per plant, fruit width (cm), average fruit weight (g) and yield per plant (kg), which suggested that picking based on these traits would be effective. High heritability combined with moderate to high genetic advance was recorded for vine length (cm), days to first flowering bud, node number to first male flower appearance and node number to first female flower appearance (Table 3). Yield per plant were resulted highly positive significant association with fruit width, number of fruits per plant, and average fruit weight at both genotypic and phenotypic level indicated that the overall fruit yield per vine would increase as a result of selection for these traits. Days to first fruit setting resulted positive significant association with days to first flowering bud, days to first fruit picking. The outcomes are consistent with the findings of Chikkeri et al. (2018); Ahmad et al. (2019) ; Rashid et al., (2020) in bottle gourd.

C. Genetic divergence

Study on genetic divergence of bottle gourd with 30 genotypes were differed significantly with regards to the character under study and displayed marked divergence, when taking 14 characters together. Based on (D2) statistics of Mahalanobis (1936) and also by the use of non-hierarchical Euclidean cluster analysis, Five divergent groups were formed from the 30 genotype data. Cluster 1 has 10 genotypes, Cluster 2 have 7 genotypes, Cluster 3 have 9 genotypes, Cluster 4 have 3 genotypes and cluster 5 have 1 genotype. 

Data findings showed that cluster 1 included maximum number of the genotypes which were encouraging, with the majority of the yield attributable traits like fruit length, protein content, fruit width, average fruit weight, days to first flowering bud, number of fruits per plant and these genotypes can be used as donors in breeding high yielding varieties (Table 4) and (Fig. 1). Similar results were also published by Ahmad et al. (2021); Rambabu et al. (2020); Rehan et al. (2020); Damor et al. (2017) in bottle gourd.

Table 1:  Fruit quality parameters of bottle gourd.

Sr. No.

Genotypes

Fruit shape

Fruit colour

Fruit surface

1.

Sharada

Cylindrical

light green

smooth

2.

Pusa Santushti

Pear

light green

fine hairy

3.

Amrit F1

Cylindrical

light green

smooth

4.

Narendra Shishir

Round

light green

smooth

5.

Surag

Cylindrical

light green

smooth

6

Madhu Sree

Round

light green

fine hairy

7.

Pusa Samrudhi

Cylindrical

light green

smooth

8.

IC-594545

Round

whitish green

smooth

9.

RBG-1

Cylindrical

dark patchy green

smooth

10.

RBG-2

Cylindrical

whitish green

smooth

11.

RBG-3

Bottle

light patchy green

smooth

12.

RBG-4

Round

light green

smooth

13.

RBG-5

Cylindrical

whitish green

smooth

14.

RBG-6

Pear

whitish green

fine hairy

15.

RBG-7

Bottle

light patchy green

fine hairy

16.

Pusa Naveen

Bottle

light green

fine hairy

17.

Hybrid Green Gold

Cylindrical

light green

smooth

18.

MAHY8

Cylindrical

light green

fine hairy

19.

Muskan

Cylindrical

light green

fine hairy

20.

Mahi

Cylindrical

light green

smooth

21.

Narendra Madhuri

Flat round

light green

fine hairy

22.

Arka Bahar

Cylindrical

light green

fine hairy

23.

RBG-8

Crooked

dark patchy green

smooth

24.

RBG-9

Bottle

dark patchy green

smooth

25.

RBG-10

Crooked

dark patchy green

smooth

26.

RBG-11

Crooked

dark patchy green

smooth

27.

RBG-12

Bottle

light green

fine hairy

28.

RBG-13

Crooked

whitish green

smooth

29.

RBG-14

Crooked

light patchy green

smooth

30.

RBG-16

cylindical

whitish green

smooth

Table 2: ANOVA analysis of bottle gourd genotypes for different characters.

Sr. No.

Characters

Source of variation

Replications Mean sum of squares

Treatments Mean sum of squares

Error

1.

d.f

2

29

58

2.

Vine length

567.8

17813.2**

1286.2

3.

Days to first flowering bud

4.011

39.815**

1.448

4.

Node number to first male flower appearance

0.433

5.848**

0.881

5.

Node number to first female flower appearance

0.300

5.572**

1.334

6.

Days to first fruit setting

6.933

62.974**

2.807

7.

Days to first fruit picking

5.633

66.460**

3.955

8.

Number of fruits per plant

0.344

4.470**

0.298

9.

Fruit length

4.633

281.641**

5.116

10.

Fruit width

0.446

20.031**

0.732

11.

Average fruit weight

0.004

0.082**

0.009

12.

Yield per plant

0.505

8.688**

0.656

13.

Yield per ha

1559.2

26816.3**

2025.2

14.

Total Soluble Solid

0.007

0.908**

0.009

15.

Protein Content

210.6

3949.1**

77.4

16.

Ascorbic acid content

0.040

9.287**

0.136

*Significant at 5% level of probability,  ** Significant at 1% level of probability


Table  3: Mean, Range, Coefficient of variations (GCV and PCV), Genetic Advance, Genetic Advance as Per cent of mean and Heritability, for 21 Characters of bottle gourd genotypes.

Characters

Range

Mean

Vp

Vg

PCV (%)

GCV (%)

Genetic Advance

Genetic Advance as % of mean

Broad sense heritability (%)

DFFB

39.3-26.0

32.21

14.23

12.78

11.70

11.09

6.98

21.65

89.83

FMFEN

13.0-8.67

10.90

2.53

1.65

14.56

11.76

2.14

19.58

65.25

FFFEN

15.3-10.6

12.93

2.74

1.41

12.81

9.18

1.75

13.57

51.42

FFS

57.3-37.3

46.92

22.86

20.05

10.16

9.52

8.64

18.37

87.72

FFP

66.3-46.0

55.62

24.79

20.83

8.99

8.24

8.62

15.57

84.05

FL

46.6-10.0

30.76

97.29

92.17

32.09

31.23

19.25

62.63

94.74

FW

12.6-4.30

6.99

7.16

6.43

38.29

36.28

4.95

70.82

89.78

F Wt

0.87-0.63

0.75

0.03

0.02

22.01

18.62

0.27

32.45

71.55

NFPP

8.0-4.6

6.42

1.68

1.39

19.46

17.66

2.20

33.00

82.33

YPP

6.6-3.4

4.82

3.33

2.67

32.29

28.94

3.02

53.42

80.32

VL

800.0-570.0

697.44

6795.17

5509.0

11.50

10.36

137.67

19.22

81.07

TSS

2.93-1.67

2.29

0.30

0.29

22.05

21.72

1.11

44.07

97.02

PC

219.6-138.1

182.04

1367.97

1290.5

18.30

17.78

71.88

35.57

94.34

ACC

16.9-11.2

14.61

3.18

3.05

12.41

12.14

3.52

24.47

95.72

Vp- phenotypic variance, Vg - genotypic variance, PCV- phenotypic coefficient of variance (%), GCV- genotypic coefficient of variance(%), DFFB- days to first flowering bud, FMFEN- first male flower at early node, FFFEN- first female flower at early node, FFS- days to first fruit setting, FFP- days to first fruit picking, FL- fruit length(cm), FW- fruit width(cm), F Wt- average fruit weight(g), NFPP- number of fruits per plant, YPP- yield per plant (Kg), YPH- yield per ha(q), VL- vine length (cm), T.S.S- total Soluble Solid (°Brix), PC- protein Content (mg/100g), ACC- ascorbic acid content (mg/100g)

Table 4: Clustering pattern of 30 bottle gourd genotypes by Tocher’s method.

Group

Number of genotypes

Genotypes

Cluster 1

10

RBG-8, RBG-9, Pusa Samrudhi, Mahi, Amrit F1, MAHY8, Surag RBG-13, RBG-7, Sharada

Cluster 2

7

RBG-11, RBG-14, RBG-10, Hybrid Green Gold, RBG-12, RBG-3, Pusa Santushti

Cluster 3

9

Madhu Sree, RBG-4, RBG-16, RBG-5, RBG-6, RBG-1, Narendra Madhuri, IC-594545, Narendra Shishir

Cluster 4

3

Muskan, Arka Bahar, RBG-2

Cluster 5

1

Pusa Naveen

Fig. 1. Percentage contribution of different characters towards diversity in bottle gourd genotypes.

Conclusion

It is possible to draw the very convenient conclusion that there is a great deal of scope for improvement in the desired attributes of this seemingly highly valuable vegetable crop, which has not received the attention it deserves given its potential. This conclusion is based on data on various important economic traits, including phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variability, heritability, genetic advance in percent of mean and genetic divergence analysis.


Future Scope

Genotypes Hybrid Green Gold followed by MAHY 8 and Pusa Samrudhi, may be used for higher fruit yield per plant and also, these possess earlier to days to first flowering bud, earliest node number to first female flower appearance, highest fruit weight and more protein content.

References

Ahmad, M., Singh, B., Alam, K., Prakash, S. and Gupta, A. (2021). Evaluation of genetic diversity in bottle gourd germplasm based on phenotypic characters for yield and yield associated traits. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 11(6), 59–63.

Ahmad, M., Singh, B., Singh, M. K. and Kumar, M. (2019). Study of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance among the characters of bottle gourd. Progressive Agriculture, 19(2), 217-219.

Burton, G. W. and Devane, E. H. (1953). Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundiancea) from replicated Pradesh, India. Legal Research, 39(2), 163-169.

Chikkeri, S. S., Duhan, D. S., Panghal, V. P. S. and Arya, R. K. (2018). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advances analysis for quantitative traits in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] Genotypes. Vegetable Science45(2), 173-179.

Damor, A. S., Patel, J. N., Acharya, R. R. and Kalola, A. (2017). Genetic Divergence Study in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 7(4), 263-268.

Engels, J. M. and Ebert, A. W. (2021). A critical review of the current global ex situ conservation system for plant agrobiodiversity. I. History of the development of the global system in the context of the political and legal framework and its major conservation components. Plants, 10(8), 1557.

Goyal, V. K. and Bisen, R. (2017). Assessment of genetic divergence in Niger germplasm. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 5(4), 1482-1485.

Gurcan, K., Say, A., Yetisir, H. and Denli, N. (2015). A study of genetic diversity in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] Population, and implication for the historical origins on bottle gourds in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 62, 321-333.

Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal, 47(7), 314-318.

Kumar, D., Kumar, V., Kumar, A., Prakash, S. and Singh, D. (2021). Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance among quantitative and qualitative characters in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Standl.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 10, 617-621.

Lush (1949). Inter-se correlation and regression of characters. Proceedings of American Society of Animal Production, 33, 293-301.

Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. National Institute of Science of India, 2, 49- 55.

Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR Publication, New Delhi.

Patel, P., Sharma, R. K., Bhardwaj, A., Kumar, R., Sahay, S., Kumar, A., and Singh, A. B. Combining Ability Studies in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.] for Yield and its Attributing Traits during February Season.In Biological Forum–An International Journal, 15(1), 367-372.

Rambabu, E., Mandal, A. R., Hazra, P., Senapati, B. K. and Thapa, U. (2020). Genetic divergence studies in Bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(3), 2304-2306.

Ranganna, S. (1986). Hand Book of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products Chapter No: 5, Pages, 106-109.

Rashid, M., Wani, K. P., Hussain, K., Dar, Z. A., Singh, P. K., Khalil, A. and Rizvi, S. (2020). Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] Genotypes. International Journal of Chemical Studies8(3), 455-458.

Rehan, Singh, M., Kumar, M., Kumar, V., Malik, S. and Singh, A. (2020). Assessment of the genetic diversity in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(10), 1003–1010.

Singh, D., Singh, B., Prakesh, S., Kumar, M., Kumar, V., Chand, P. and Shami, V. (2021). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in bottlegourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.)Standl.].Annals of Horticulture, 14(1), 72–78.

Sohi, A., Prasad, V. M., Bahadur, V., and  Topno, S. E. (2021). Hybrids evaluation of bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.] for fruit growth yield quality and morphological traits in Prayagraj Agro-Climatic conditions. Biological Forum–An International Journal, 13(2), 477-480.

Srivastava, D., Khan, N., Shamim, M., Yadav, P., Pandey, P. and Singh, K. (2014). Assessment of the genetic diversity in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.].Genotypes Using SDS-PAGE and RAPD Markers. National Academy Science Letters, 37, 155-161.

Venkatraman, M., and Haripriya, K. (2021). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) standl.] Genotypes. Annals of Plant and Soil Research23(2), 200-203.

How to cite this article

Sneha Rathore, Arjun Lal Ola, Manju Verma, Anita Choudhary and Sonu Kumari  (2024). Genetic Diversity and Morphological Characterization Studies in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(7): 216-220.