Author:
Sneha Rathore1*, Arjun Lal Ola1, Manju Verma2, Anita Choudhary3 and Sonu Kumari3
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(7): 216-220, 2024
Address:
1Department of Horticulture, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh), India.
2Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Nagaur, Agriculture University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India.
3Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Agriculture University Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India.
(Corresponding author: Sneha Rathore*)
DOI: -
Variability, Heritability, Diversity, Genetic advance, cluster analysis.
Cucurbits are one of the widely growing vegetable crops consisting large number of cultivated species. One of the significant members of this family with the most genetic diversity in fruit morphological characteristics is the bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), which has chromosomal number 2n = 22. In different regions of India, it is also known by the names Calabash, Doodhi and Lauki (Gurcan et al., 2015).
Bottle gourd is one of the earliest vegetable crop that was cultivated for human consumption. In addition to offering food and medicine, bottle gourds are also used to make a wide range of tools and instruments including bowls, bottles, containers, floats for fishing nets (Patel et al., 2023). The bottle gourd is found in South Africa and India in its wild form and is said to have originated in Africa and America (Srivastava et al., 2014). The critical and initial steps in any crop development programme are the collection, preservation, and evaluation of germplasm. An effective breeding programme must be created with a enhanced comprehension of the type and level of genetic diversity contained in the breeding material (Engels and Ebert 2021).
Comprehensive biological knowledge and a grasp of genetic diversity for yield and its constituent parts are required for the implementation of an intense breeding and improvement programme (Damor et al., 2017). The existence of genetic variability, the way in which economic traits are passed down through the generations, heritability, the type of gene action, and the relative magnitude of additive and dominance as well as the overall genotypic and phenotypic variance of the population must all be thoroughly understood. Considering the availability of genetic variability, there is scope of yield and quality improvement and thereby develop export potential of bottlegourd.
Genetic diversity among germplasm is important for genetic development of any crop since it makes it allows to detect the most divergent parents on the basis of contribution of various qualitative and quantitative parameters (Sohi et al., 2021).Which can be utilized in any hybridization programme. To determine which genotypes are optimal for a breeding population, genetic diversity in the germplasm must be evaluated (Goyal and Bisen 2017).
The current study was implemented during the kharif 2022 in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications at Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. RLBCAU is situated in the Bundelkhand agro-climatic zone (6) of Uttar Pradesh. The experimental site is situated at 25.30° N latitude and 78.32° E longitude at an altitude of 227 m above MSL. The experimental material comprises 30 bottle gourd genotypes, which is collected from different sources and the genotypes are laid out in 3 × 3 m plot size with the spacing of 0.6 m between each 5 plants in a plot.
Three randomly chosen plants from each genotype were used to record the observations for 15 distinct features viz., vine length (cm), days to first flowering bud, node number to first male flower appearance, node number to first female flower appearance, days to first fruit setting, days to first fruit picking, number of fruits per plant, fruit length (cm), fruit width (cm), average fruit weight(g), yield per plant (Kg), yield per ha(q), fruit shape, protein content(mg/100g), total soluble solid (obrix) and ascorbic acid content (mg/100g). TSS content was recorded by Hand Refractometer, Protein content was calculated by Kjeldahl method and Ascorbic acid content was calculated by 2, 6-dichlorophenol indophenol titration method (Ranganna, 1986).
Analysis of variance was computed for statistical analysis using the method outlined by Panse and Sukhatme (1967). GCV and PCV were computed according to Burton and De Vane (1953), Heritability broad sense was calculated by the formula given by Lush (1949); Burton and De Vane (1953) and genetic gain was calculated utilizing the formula proposed by Johnson et al. (1955); Lush (1949). The D2 statistic was developed by Mahalanobis (1936) is a helpful tool for evaluating genetic divergence among crop varieties.
A. Analysis of variance
The experiment's analysis of variance revealed extremely significant variations among the 30 genotypes for every trait under study (Table 2). The highly significant mean sum of squares was recorded for the traits viz., vine length, days to first flowering bud, node number to first male flower appearance, node number to first female flower appearance, days to first fruit setting, days to first fruit picking, number of fruits per plant, fruit length, fruit width, average fruit weight, yield per plant, yield per hectare, total soluble solid, protein content and ascorbic acid content, revealed significant difference for all the parameters, indicating sufficient amount of variation among all the germplasm for all parameters under the study. Kumar et al. (2021); Singh et al. (2021); Venkatraman (2021); Rashid et al. (2020); Ahmad et al. (2019); Chikkeri et al. (2018) also recorded a very high significant differences among the bottle gourd genotypes with respect to most of the parameters under their studies. The results suggested existence of adequate degree of variation between the experimental material and hence, create more scope for development of desired characters through selection in bottle gourd.
B. Genetic parameters
Higher magnitude of GCV and PCV was noted for fruit length (cm), fruit width (cm) and yield per plant (Kg), which demonstrating the existence of a broad range of genetic variability for these characteristics in the germplasm. Additionally, Studies revealed that these characteristics have a wide genetic base, little environmental effect, and are governed by additive genes, indicating that there is considerable potential for further evolution of these traits through selection. Similar results were also published by Kumar et al. (2021). The moderate level of PCV and GCV for days to first flowering bud, vine length (cm), node number to first male flower appearance, number of fruits per plant, node number to first female flower appearance, average fruit weight, days to first fruit picking, protein content (mg/100g), total soluble solid (°Brix) and ascorbic acid content (mg/100g) indicated moderate variation between the genotypes under study for these vegetative traits in bottle gourd, which indicated that the phenotypic-based selection will be trustworthy since the investigated traits were less impacted by environment (Table 3).
High heritability combined with high genetic advance was recorded for fruit length (cm), number of fruits per plant, fruit width (cm), average fruit weight (g) and yield per plant (kg), which suggested that picking based on these traits would be effective. High heritability combined with moderate to high genetic advance was recorded for vine length (cm), days to first flowering bud, node number to first male flower appearance and node number to first female flower appearance (Table 3). Yield per plant were resulted highly positive significant association with fruit width, number of fruits per plant, and average fruit weight at both genotypic and phenotypic level indicated that the overall fruit yield per vine would increase as a result of selection for these traits. Days to first fruit setting resulted positive significant association with days to first flowering bud, days to first fruit picking. The outcomes are consistent with the findings of Chikkeri et al. (2018); Ahmad et al. (2019) ; Rashid et al., (2020) in bottle gourd.
C. Genetic divergence
Study on genetic divergence of bottle gourd with 30 genotypes were differed significantly with regards to the character under study and displayed marked divergence, when taking 14 characters together. Based on (D2) statistics of Mahalanobis (1936) and also by the use of non-hierarchical Euclidean cluster analysis, Five divergent groups were formed from the 30 genotype data. Cluster 1 has 10 genotypes, Cluster 2 have 7 genotypes, Cluster 3 have 9 genotypes, Cluster 4 have 3 genotypes and cluster 5 have 1 genotype.
Data findings showed that cluster 1 included maximum number of the genotypes which were encouraging, with the majority of the yield attributable traits like fruit length, protein content, fruit width, average fruit weight, days to first flowering bud, number of fruits per plant and these genotypes can be used as donors in breeding high yielding varieties (Table 4) and (Fig. 1). Similar results were also published by Ahmad et al. (2021); Rambabu et al. (2020); Rehan et al. (2020); Damor et al. (2017) in bottle gourd.
Table 1: Fruit quality parameters of bottle gourd.
Sr. No. | Genotypes | Fruit shape | Fruit colour | Fruit surface |
1. | Sharada | Cylindrical | light green | smooth |
2. | Pusa Santushti | Pear | light green | fine hairy |
3. | Amrit F1 | Cylindrical | light green | smooth |
4. | Narendra Shishir | Round | light green | smooth |
5. | Surag | Cylindrical | light green | smooth |
6 | Madhu Sree | Round | light green | fine hairy |
7. | Pusa Samrudhi | Cylindrical | light green | smooth |
8. | IC-594545 | Round | whitish green | smooth |
9. | RBG-1 | Cylindrical | dark patchy green | smooth |
10. | RBG-2 | Cylindrical | whitish green | smooth |
11. | RBG-3 | Bottle | light patchy green | smooth |
12. | RBG-4 | Round | light green | smooth |
13. | RBG-5 | Cylindrical | whitish green | smooth |
14. | RBG-6 | Pear | whitish green | fine hairy |
15. | RBG-7 | Bottle | light patchy green | fine hairy |
16. | Pusa Naveen | Bottle | light green | fine hairy |
17. | Hybrid Green Gold | Cylindrical | light green | smooth |
18. | MAHY8 | Cylindrical | light green | fine hairy |
19. | Muskan | Cylindrical | light green | fine hairy |
20. | Mahi | Cylindrical | light green | smooth |
21. | Narendra Madhuri | Flat round | light green | fine hairy |
22. | Arka Bahar | Cylindrical | light green | fine hairy |
23. | RBG-8 | Crooked | dark patchy green | smooth |
24. | RBG-9 | Bottle | dark patchy green | smooth |
25. | RBG-10 | Crooked | dark patchy green | smooth |
26. | RBG-11 | Crooked | dark patchy green | smooth |
27. | RBG-12 | Bottle | light green | fine hairy |
28. | RBG-13 | Crooked | whitish green | smooth |
29. | RBG-14 | Crooked | light patchy green | smooth |
30. | RBG-16 | cylindical | whitish green | smooth |
Table 2: ANOVA analysis of bottle gourd genotypes for different characters.
Sr. No. | Characters | Source of variation | ||
Replications Mean sum of squares | Treatments Mean sum of squares | Error | ||
1. | d.f | 2 | 29 | 58 |
2. | Vine length | 567.8 | 17813.2** | 1286.2 |
3. | Days to first flowering bud | 4.011 | 39.815** | 1.448 |
4. | Node number to first male flower appearance | 0.433 | 5.848** | 0.881 |
5. | Node number to first female flower appearance | 0.300 | 5.572** | 1.334 |
6. | Days to first fruit setting | 6.933 | 62.974** | 2.807 |
7. | Days to first fruit picking | 5.633 | 66.460** | 3.955 |
8. | Number of fruits per plant | 0.344 | 4.470** | 0.298 |
9. | Fruit length | 4.633 | 281.641** | 5.116 |
10. | Fruit width | 0.446 | 20.031** | 0.732 |
11. | Average fruit weight | 0.004 | 0.082** | 0.009 |
12. | Yield per plant | 0.505 | 8.688** | 0.656 |
13. | Yield per ha | 1559.2 | 26816.3** | 2025.2 |
14. | Total Soluble Solid | 0.007 | 0.908** | 0.009 |
15. | Protein Content | 210.6 | 3949.1** | 77.4 |
16. | Ascorbic acid content | 0.040 | 9.287** | 0.136 |
*Significant at 5% level of probability, ** Significant at 1% level of probability
Table 3: Mean, Range, Coefficient of variations (GCV and PCV), Genetic Advance, Genetic Advance as Per cent of mean and Heritability, for 21 Characters of bottle gourd genotypes.
Characters | Range | Mean | Vp | Vg | PCV (%) | GCV (%) | Genetic Advance | Genetic Advance as % of mean | Broad sense heritability (%) |
DFFB | 39.3-26.0 | 32.21 | 14.23 | 12.78 | 11.70 | 11.09 | 6.98 | 21.65 | 89.83 |
FMFEN | 13.0-8.67 | 10.90 | 2.53 | 1.65 | 14.56 | 11.76 | 2.14 | 19.58 | 65.25 |
FFFEN | 15.3-10.6 | 12.93 | 2.74 | 1.41 | 12.81 | 9.18 | 1.75 | 13.57 | 51.42 |
FFS | 57.3-37.3 | 46.92 | 22.86 | 20.05 | 10.16 | 9.52 | 8.64 | 18.37 | 87.72 |
FFP | 66.3-46.0 | 55.62 | 24.79 | 20.83 | 8.99 | 8.24 | 8.62 | 15.57 | 84.05 |
FL | 46.6-10.0 | 30.76 | 97.29 | 92.17 | 32.09 | 31.23 | 19.25 | 62.63 | 94.74 |
FW | 12.6-4.30 | 6.99 | 7.16 | 6.43 | 38.29 | 36.28 | 4.95 | 70.82 | 89.78 |
F Wt | 0.87-0.63 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 22.01 | 18.62 | 0.27 | 32.45 | 71.55 |
NFPP | 8.0-4.6 | 6.42 | 1.68 | 1.39 | 19.46 | 17.66 | 2.20 | 33.00 | 82.33 |
YPP | 6.6-3.4 | 4.82 | 3.33 | 2.67 | 32.29 | 28.94 | 3.02 | 53.42 | 80.32 |
VL | 800.0-570.0 | 697.44 | 6795.17 | 5509.0 | 11.50 | 10.36 | 137.67 | 19.22 | 81.07 |
TSS | 2.93-1.67 | 2.29 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 22.05 | 21.72 | 1.11 | 44.07 | 97.02 |
PC | 219.6-138.1 | 182.04 | 1367.97 | 1290.5 | 18.30 | 17.78 | 71.88 | 35.57 | 94.34 |
ACC | 16.9-11.2 | 14.61 | 3.18 | 3.05 | 12.41 | 12.14 | 3.52 | 24.47 | 95.72 |
Vp- phenotypic variance, Vg - genotypic variance, PCV- phenotypic coefficient of variance (%), GCV- genotypic coefficient of variance(%), DFFB- days to first flowering bud, FMFEN- first male flower at early node, FFFEN- first female flower at early node, FFS- days to first fruit setting, FFP- days to first fruit picking, FL- fruit length(cm), FW- fruit width(cm), F Wt- average fruit weight(g), NFPP- number of fruits per plant, YPP- yield per plant (Kg), YPH- yield per ha(q), VL- vine length (cm), T.S.S- total Soluble Solid (°Brix), PC- protein Content (mg/100g), ACC- ascorbic acid content (mg/100g)
Table 4: Clustering pattern of 30 bottle gourd genotypes by Tocher’s method.
Group | Number of genotypes | Genotypes |
Cluster 1 | 10 | RBG-8, RBG-9, Pusa Samrudhi, Mahi, Amrit F1, MAHY8, Surag RBG-13, RBG-7, Sharada |
Cluster 2 | 7 | RBG-11, RBG-14, RBG-10, Hybrid Green Gold, RBG-12, RBG-3, Pusa Santushti |
Cluster 3 | 9 | Madhu Sree, RBG-4, RBG-16, RBG-5, RBG-6, RBG-1, Narendra Madhuri, IC-594545, Narendra Shishir |
Cluster 4 | 3 | Muskan, Arka Bahar, RBG-2 |
Cluster 5 | 1 | Pusa Naveen |
Fig. 1. Percentage contribution of different characters towards diversity in bottle gourd genotypes.
It is possible to draw the very convenient conclusion that there is a great deal of scope for improvement in the desired attributes of this seemingly highly valuable vegetable crop, which has not received the attention it deserves given its potential. This conclusion is based on data on various important economic traits, including phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variability, heritability, genetic advance in percent of mean and genetic divergence analysis.
Genotypes Hybrid Green Gold followed by MAHY 8 and Pusa Samrudhi, may be used for higher fruit yield per plant and also, these possess earlier to days to first flowering bud, earliest node number to first female flower appearance, highest fruit weight and more protein content.
Ahmad, M., Singh, B., Alam, K., Prakash, S. and Gupta, A. (2021). Evaluation of genetic diversity in bottle gourd germplasm based on phenotypic characters for yield and yield associated traits. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 11(6), 59–63.
Ahmad, M., Singh, B., Singh, M. K. and Kumar, M. (2019). Study of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance among the characters of bottle gourd. Progressive Agriculture, 19(2), 217-219.
Burton, G. W. and Devane, E. H. (1953). Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundiancea) from replicated Pradesh, India. Legal Research, 39(2), 163-169.
Chikkeri, S. S., Duhan, D. S., Panghal, V. P. S. and Arya, R. K. (2018). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advances analysis for quantitative traits in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] Genotypes. Vegetable Science, 45(2), 173-179.
Damor, A. S., Patel, J. N., Acharya, R. R. and Kalola, A. (2017). Genetic Divergence Study in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 7(4), 263-268.
Engels, J. M. and Ebert, A. W. (2021). A critical review of the current global ex situ conservation system for plant agrobiodiversity. I. History of the development of the global system in the context of the political and legal framework and its major conservation components. Plants, 10(8), 1557.
Goyal, V. K. and Bisen, R. (2017). Assessment of genetic divergence in Niger germplasm. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 5(4), 1482-1485.
Gurcan, K., Say, A., Yetisir, H. and Denli, N. (2015). A study of genetic diversity in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] Population, and implication for the historical origins on bottle gourds in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 62, 321-333.
Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal, 47(7), 314-318.
Kumar, D., Kumar, V., Kumar, A., Prakash, S. and Singh, D. (2021). Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance among quantitative and qualitative characters in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Standl.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 10, 617-621.
Lush (1949). Inter-se correlation and regression of characters. Proceedings of American Society of Animal Production, 33, 293-301.
Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. National Institute of Science of India, 2, 49- 55.
Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR Publication, New Delhi.
Patel, P., Sharma, R. K., Bhardwaj, A., Kumar, R., Sahay, S., Kumar, A., and Singh, A. B. Combining Ability Studies in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.] for Yield and its Attributing Traits during February Season.In Biological Forum–An International Journal, 15(1), 367-372.
Rambabu, E., Mandal, A. R., Hazra, P., Senapati, B. K. and Thapa, U. (2020). Genetic divergence studies in Bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(3), 2304-2306.
Ranganna, S. (1986). Hand Book of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products Chapter No: 5, Pages, 106-109.
Rashid, M., Wani, K. P., Hussain, K., Dar, Z. A., Singh, P. K., Khalil, A. and Rizvi, S. (2020). Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] Genotypes. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(3), 455-458.
Rehan, Singh, M., Kumar, M., Kumar, V., Malik, S. and Singh, A. (2020). Assessment of the genetic diversity in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(10), 1003–1010.
Singh, D., Singh, B., Prakesh, S., Kumar, M., Kumar, V., Chand, P. and Shami, V. (2021). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in bottlegourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.)Standl.].Annals of Horticulture, 14(1), 72–78.
Sohi, A., Prasad, V. M., Bahadur, V., and Topno, S. E. (2021). Hybrids evaluation of bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.] for fruit growth yield quality and morphological traits in Prayagraj Agro-Climatic conditions. Biological Forum–An International Journal, 13(2), 477-480.
Srivastava, D., Khan, N., Shamim, M., Yadav, P., Pandey, P. and Singh, K. (2014). Assessment of the genetic diversity in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.].Genotypes Using SDS-PAGE and RAPD Markers. National Academy Science Letters, 37, 155-161.
Sneha Rathore, Arjun Lal Ola, Manju Verma, Anita Choudhary and Sonu Kumari (2024). Genetic Diversity and Morphological Characterization Studies in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(7): 216-220.