Author:
Alka Singh1*, S.K. Chavan2, G.D. Patel1, A.J. Bhandari1, H.P. Shah1 and V.B. Patel3
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(3): 147-152, 2024
Address:
1Department of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture (Gujarat), India.
2Hitech Floriculture Project, Agriculture College, Pune (Maharashtra), India.
3Department of Basic Science and Humanities, College of Forestry (Gujarat), India.
(Corresponding author: Alka Singh*)
DOI: -
A new profuse flowering variety G. N. Ad. 4 (Shobhita) derived from a cross of Picottee and Deang Udam Sap was released in adenium, a popular ornamental plant in Gujarat. Research on Adenium obesum, a popular flowering pot plant is being conducted with the basic objective of genetic improvement at Advance Technology Centre of soilless system, department of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, NAU, Navsari. Hybridization was done involving ten parents (six germplasm as female and three germplasm as male) and their crosses were studied wherein, a cross viz., NAPDUS1 (Picotee × Daeng Udam Sap) showed novel flower trait of profuse flowering habit in cluster with attractive pinkish red coloured petals having sharply pointed tip. Further, NAPDUS1 was evaluated for stability and other flowering characters and tested along with its parents viz., Picotee, Daeng Udam Sap, local germplasm i.e. Local Pink and the earlier released variety, GAd2 as check for three years during 2018to 2020. NAPDUS1 was significantly superior in terms of number of flowers per cluster (10) and maximum number of opened flowers per cluster (8) and number of flowers per plant per year (245) as compared to parents, Local Pink and GAd2 as inferred from the three years mean data. Further, flower clusters per plant and flowering period were also higher in NAPDUS1 as compared to its parents, local pink and check G Ad.2
Adenium, G Ad2, Shobhita, G. Ad.2, pot plant, germplasm, hybridization.
Adenium obesum (Forssk.) Roem. & Schult, also known as Desert rose and Impala lily is becoming highly popular for pot culture throughout the world owing to its beautiful sculptural caudex, good branching and flowering habit and tolerance to drought stress (Dimmit, 1998; Chavan et al., 2016; Chavan et al., 2018; Colombo et al., 2016; Sindhuja et al., 2020). It is an excellent plant for xeriscaping and roof top gardens (Chavan et al., 2016; Colombo et al., 2016; Colombo et al., 2018). Belonging to the family Apocynaceae, it is native to Africa, South of the Sahara from Senegal to Sudan and Kenya, and through Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Yemen (Plaizier, 1980; Dimmitt and Hanson 1991). Until recently it was considered a relatively new flowering plant in the flower industry (Hastuti et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2017 ; Singh et al., 2019), however, it is now in wide cultivation in many tropical countries including India, Philippines and Thailand (Chavan et al., 2016; Colombo et al., 2018; Roy and Fatmi 2022; Singh et al., 2020) with great recognition in the floriculture industry (Wannakrairoj, 2008; Versiani et al., 2014; Mcbride et al., 2014).
Although, research in Adenium towards selecting or breeding superior horticultural forms has been inadequate (Chavan et al., 2017, 2018; Sindhuja et al., 2020, 2022; Singh et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2019; Singh et al., 2022).
Work on genetic improvement employing hybridization and selection in Adenium obesum with the objective to induce profuse flowering, novel flower colour, flower form and long flowering period etc., is being carried out at Advance Technology Centre of soilless system, at ASPEE College of Horticulture, NAU, Navsari. A germplasm NAPDUS1 that was renamed as GNAd4 (Shobhita) derived from cross of Picottee and Daeng Udam Sap showed novel flower trait for flowering profusely in cluster with attractive pinkish red coloured petals with dark red coloured margin and sharply pointed tip. It was further multiplied by grafting and evaluated for its stability and other flowering parameters and its performance was tested over its parents Picottee and Daeng Udam Sap, commonly grown local germplasm collection viz., Local Pink and the earlier released variety G Ad2 as check.
Breeding work on Adenium obesum was conducted at Advance Technology Centre of soilless system’, Department of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, ACH, NAU, Navsari during the year 2014-2021. Hybridization was followed in adenium with six germplasmas female (Line) viz., Sudarshan, Arrogant, Mung Siam, Harry Potter, Picottee, Vithoons White and three germplasm as male (Taster) viz., Daeng Udam Sap, Double Sweet Heart and Morlok Dok (Chavan et al., 2018). Among different crosses obtained, NAPDUS1 derived from Picotte and Daeng Udam Sap was selected and multiplied by grafting on Local Pink root stock as per the standardized method (Singh et al., 2023) and evaluated for stability and other flowering characters along with other germplasm i.e. parents G2-Picottee, G3-Daeng Udam Sap, G4-Local Pink and earlier released variety G5-G.Ad.2 as check. NAPDUS1 was renamed at GNAd4 (Shobhita) for variety release. The experiment was conducted under NV greenhouse units at advanced technology centre (ATC) and Practical Training Centre of Hi-tech horticulture (PTC) at NAU, Navsari under completely randomized design system with four repetitions for three years during 2018 to 2020. The plants were planted in plastic pots of size 13 cm height × 15 cm width and were placed at a spacing of 30 cm × 30 cm on stands in the greenhouse. The recommended package of practices (Singh et al., 2018) was followed for raising the crop. Five plants from each germplasm were selected randomly and were tagged for recording the observations on flowering parameters namely, number of flowers per cluster, maximum opened flowers per cluster, flower clusters per plant, flowers per plant per year, flowering period (days) per year. Morphological characters for flower and leaf of all the germplasm were also noted. Consumer preference was also estimated as display quality based on 5 point visual score for flower colour, flowering behaviour and overall appearance. The data of three years were collected and subjected to the statistical analysis for CRD design, according the procedure described by Panse and Sukhatme (1967) for proper interpretation and significance of difference was tested by (F) test at 5% probability level. Results were used to evaluate the performance of the different germplasm collections for various flowering parameters.
Flower parameters. Flowering trait in terms of clustering or bunching habit, flower colour, number of flowers per plant eventually influence the flowering pot plant value and ultimately the consumer’s preference (Sankari et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2020). GNAd4 (Shobhita) i.e. NAPDUS1 recorded significantly maximum number of flowers per cluster (10.24) that was 18.26% higher over check GAd2 (Table 1) and opened flowers per cluster (8.22) that was 136.89% higher over check GAd2 (Table 2 and Fig. 2) as well as flower clusters per plant, (8.22) that showed 16.67% increase over check GAd2 (Table 3) and as per the mean data of three years.
Genetic factor is responsible for morphological differences when different germplasm collections are grown under identical conditions with uniform management practices. Thus, variation among different adenium germplasms is an indicative of differences in the genetic makeup. These results are in agreement with the earlier observations of Dimmitt (1998); Varella et al. (2015); Singh et al., 2017, 2020) in Adenium.
Yield in terms of number of flowers per plant per year and flowering period in days are important parameters for flowering pot plants. GNAd4 (Shobhita) recorded significantly maximum flowers per plant (245.19) that was 73.27% higher than the GAd2 check as per the mean data of three years, Table 4. Further, flowering period was also maximum in GNAd4 (224.67 days) that showed 16.56% increase over GAd2 (Table 5). Morphological characters of all the germplasms differed has been shown in Table 6. NAPDUS1 looked attractive owing to novel flower trait for flowering profusely in cluster with attractive pinkish red coloured petals with dark red coloured margin and sharply pointed tip. Consumer preference for GNAd4 (Shobhita) was also found to be highest with maximum score for flower colour (4.4), flower form (4.7) and pot plant (4.6) as shown in Fig. 1. In the classification of cultivars as well as to study taxonomic status, genetic diversity studies based on differences in morphological characters and qualitative traits has been used as a potent tool (Lalitha Kameswari et al., 2014).
Variation in different flower traits in adenium was a result of divergence in these germplasm as opined by earlier work in adenium (Singh et al., 2017; Chavan et al., 2017; Chavan et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2019). Flower variation among different varieties have been earlier known in ornamental pot plants like rose (Shahrin et al., 2015) and Orchids (Sugapriya et al., 2012).
Adenium GNAd4 (Shobhita) assumes significance owing to its superiority and novelty in respect of flower colour and flower morphology with attractive pinkish red coloured petals with dark red coloured margin and pointed tip, as well its superior performance with respect to other flowering parameters, especially number of flowers per cluster, opened flowers per cluster, flower clusters per plant and a greater number of flowers per plant along with flowering period. Hence, GNAd 4 (Shobhita) was released as a variety in the State Variety Release Committee meeting, held at Gandhinagar, Gujarat dated 27th August 2021. The variety Shobhita is recommended to nursery men as well as landscape designers for growing as pot culture as well as for landscaping and roof top gardening.
Table 1: Number of flowers per cluster performance of GNAd 4 (Shobhita) with checks and parents.
Year | Trial | Location | G N Ad4 (Shobhita) | G Ad.2 (Check) | Picottee (Female Parent) | Daeng Udam Sap (Male Parent) | Local Pink (Local Check) | S. Em. + | C. D. at 5% | C. V. % |
2018 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Soilless Navsari | 12.22 | 9 | 3.44 | 8.11 | 4.05 | 0.23 | 0.66 | 6.28 |
2019 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Soilless Navsari | 10.44 | 10.2 | 3.11 | 6.33 | 4.15 | 0.33 | 0.97 | 10.26 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 8.33 | 8.11 | 3.54 | 6.77 | 3.41 | 0.21 | 0.59 | 8.57 | |
2020 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Soilless Navsari | 11.67 | 9.56 | 2.78 | 6.22 | 4.41 | 0.31 | 0.9 | 9.58 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 8.56 | 6.44 | 3.53 | 7.22 | 3.30 | 0.25 | 0.73 | 9.86 | |
Mean | 10.244 | 8.662 | 3.28 | 6.93 | 3.86 | |||||
Heterosis % increase over | -- | 18.26 | 212.32 | 47.82 | 165.39 | |||||
Table 2: Maximum opened flowers per cluster performance of GNAd 4 (Shobhita) with checks and parents.
Year | Trial | Location | G N Ad4 (Shobhita) | G Ad.2 (Check) | Picottee (Female Parent) | Daeng Udam Sap (Male Parent) | Local Pink (Local Check) | S. Em. + | C. D. at 5% | C. V. % |
2018 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Soilless Navsari | 9.78 | 4.45 | 2.33 | 6.22 | 2.30 | o.17 | 0.5 | 7.06 |
2019 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Soilless Navsari | 8.55 | 3.55 | 2.22 | 4.33 | 3.30 | 0.23 | 0.68 | 11.09 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 6.78 | 2.89 | 3.22 | 5.22 | 2.30 | 0.21 | 0.64 | 12.82 | |
2020 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Soilless Navsari | 9.11 | 3.44 | 1.89 | 4.22 | 2.22 | 0.31 | 0.67 | 11.14 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 6.89 | 3.00 | 2.22 | 5.33 | 3.22 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 14.33 | |
Mean | 8.22 | 3.47 | 2.38 | 5.06 | 2.67 | |||||
Heterosis %increase over | -- | 136.89 | 245.38 | 62.45 | 207.87 | |||||
Table 3: Flowers per plant per year performance of GNAd 4 (Shobhita) with checks and parents.
Year | Trial | Location | G N Ad4 (Shobhita) | G Ad.2 (Check) | Picottee (Female Parent) | Daeng Udam Sap (Male Parent) | Local Pink (Local Check) | S. Em. + | C. D. at 5% | C. V. % |
2018 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 313.33 | 186 | 81.00 | 65.00 | 61.22 | 4.41 | 12.72 | 6.85 |
2019 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 212.89 | 125.22 | 72.11 | 63.66 | 60.22 | 4.59 | 13.26 | 10.03 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 239.89 | 140.67 | 70.22 | 62.16 | 59.53 | 1.95 | 5.63 | 4.02 | |
2020 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 245.33 | 120.67 | 48.67 | 75.67 | 61.23 | 5.95 | 14.30 | 9.41 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 214.50 | 135 | 62.23 | 77.63 | 64.53 | 9.4 | 27.14 | 18.81 | |
Mean | 245.19 | 141.51 | 66.80 | 68.80 | 61.30 | |||||
Heterosis %increase over | -- | 73.27 | 267.05 | 256.38 | 299.98 | |||||
Note : G NAd4 shows 143%increase over G Ad1 and 73% increase over G Ad2 in terms of Flowers per plant per year
Table 4: Flower clusters per plant performance of GNAd 4 (Shobhita) with checks and parents.
Year | Trial | Location | G N Ad4 (Shobhita) | G Ad.2 (Check) | Picottee (Female Parent) | Daeng Udam Sap (Male Parent) | Local Pink (Local Check) | S. Em. ± | C. D. at 5% | C. V. % |
2018 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 1.79 (3.22) | 1.53 (2.33) | 1.15 (1.33) | 1.41 (2.00) | 1.19 | 4.41 | 12.72 | 6.85 |
2019 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 1.76 (3.11) | 1.56 (2.44) | 1.19 (1.44) | 1.48 (2.22) | 1.15 | 4.59 | 13.26 | 10.03 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 1.82 (3.33) | 1.45 (2.11) | 1.10 (1.22) | 1.49 (2.22) | 1.2 | 1.95 | 5.63 | 4.02 | |
2020 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 1.63 (2.67) | 1.37 (1.89) | 1.20 (1.44) | 1.41 (2.00) | 1.19 | 5.95 | 14.30 | 9.41 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 1.76 (3.11) | 1.60 (2.56) | 1.29 (1.67) | 1.53 (2.33) | 1.20 | 9.4 | 27.14 | 18.81 | |
Mean | 1.75 (3.09) | 1.50 (2.67) | 1.19 (1.42) | 1.46 (2.15) | 1.186 | |||||
Heterosis %increase over | — | 16.67 | 47.06 | 19.86 | 47.55 | |||||
Table 5: Flowering period (Days) plant performance of GNAd 4 (Shobhita) with checks and parents.
Year | Trial | Location | G N Ad4 (Shobhita) | G Ad.2 (Check) | Picottee (Female Parent) | Daeng Udam Sap (Male Parent) | Local Pink (Local Check) | S. Em. ± | C. D. at 5% | C. V. % |
2018 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 268.33 | 173.33 | 205.67 | 133.33 | 93.33 | 4.41 | 12.72 | 6.85 |
2019 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 205.22 | 197.55 | 176.33 | 101.66 | 86.22 | 4.59 | 13.26 | 10.03 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 222.78 | 211.22 | 184.33 | 110.67 | 81.66 | 1.95 | 5.63 | 4.02 | |
2020 | Varietal evaluation | ATC Navsari | 205.33 | 195.00 | 118.67 | 80.33 | 79.66 | 5.95 | 14.30 | 9.41 |
Varietal evaluation | PTC Navsari | 221.67 | 186.67 | 136.33 | 98.67 | 93.33 | 9.4 | 27.14 | 18.81 | |
Mean | 224.67 | 192.75 | 164.27 | 104.93 | 86.84 | |||||
Heterosis %increase over | -- | 16.56 | 36.77 | 114.11 | 158.72 | |||||
Table 6: Morphological characters of GNAd 4 (Shobhita) with checks and parents.
Sr. No. | Characteristics | G N Ad4 (Shobhita) | G Ad.2 (Check) | Picottee (Female Parent) | Daeng Udam Sap (Male Parent) | Local Pink (Local Check) |
1. | Leaf colour | Green | Green | Green | Green | Green |
2. | Leaf type | Small with very wavy leaf margin | Thin and long with smooth incurving margin | Medium with smooth margin | Medium and broad with smooth margin | Medium and narrow with smooth margin |
3. | Flower colour | Pinkish Red | Reddish Purple | Pinkish white | Red | Pink |
4. | Petal margin colour | Red | Strong Purple | Pink | Red | Pinkish red |
5. | Petal tip | Elongated and Sharply Pointed | Broadly pointed petal tip | Pointed | Obtuse | Slightly Pointed |
6. | Flower form | Single whorl | Double type | Single whorl | Single whorl | Single whorl |
7. | No. of petals | 5 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
8. | Corolla tube colour | Yellow | White | Cream | Reddish pink | White |
9. | Petal margin character | Smooth | Wavy | Smooth | Slightly Wavy | Slightly Wavy |
Fig. 1. Scoring for consumer preference on visual basis (5 point scale) for different germplasm in Adenium.
Fig. 2. Photographs of GNAd 4 (Shobhita).
In conclusion, this research endeavour revealed GNAd4 (Shobhita) as a new superior and novel variety in adenium that is developed from a cross of Picottee × Daeng Udam Sap. It bears profuse flowers in clusters having attractive pinkish-red coloured petals with dark red coloured margins and pointed tips.
Adenium is heterozygous in nature and a highly cross pollinated crop. There has been meagre research about breeding in adenium. The present investigation led to the development of a novel germplasm that was further released as a variety at SVRC. There is great scope of exploring breeding work in adenium that can further lead to development of new germplasms having novel flower colour, flower form and long flowering period. The newly developed variety GNAd4 (Shobhita) can be further exploited for commercial application as well as for breeding work in the floriculture industry
Chavan, S. K., Singh, A., Bhandari, A. J. and Patel, B. N. (2016). Management of Potted Adeniums. Floriculture Today, 21(2), 10-15.
Chavan, S. K., Singh, A. and Barkule, S. R. (2017). Application of DNA marker (RAPD) technology to study molecular diversity in Adenium obesum (Forssk), Roem and Schult. Eco. Env. & Cons., 24, 403-407.
Chavan, S. K., Singh, A. and Barkule, S. R. (2018). Genetic variability studies on Adenium obesum (Forssk.) Roem.&Schult, Asian J. of Microbiol.Biotech. Env. Sci., 20 (3), 965-969.
Colombo, R. C., Favetta, V., de Melo T. D., de Faria, R. T. and de Aguiar e Silva, M. A. (2016). Potting media, growth and build-up of nutrients in container-grown desert rose. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 10(2), 258-263.
Colombo, R. C., da Cruz, M. A., de Carvalho, D. U., Hoshino, R. T., CitoAlves, G. A. and De Faria, R. T. (2018). Adenium obesum as a new potted flower: growth management. Ornam. Hortic., 24(3), 197-205.
Dimmitt, M. and Hanson, C. (1991). The genus Adenium in cultivation. Part 1: A. obesum and A. multiflorum. Cactus and Succulent Journal, 63(5), 223-225.
Dimmitt, M. G. (1998). Adenium culture, growing large specimens quickly. Cactus Succulent J., 20, 59–64.
Hossain, M. A. (2018). A review on Adenium obesum: A potential endemic medicinal plant in Oman. Beni Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7, 559-563.
McBride, K. M., Henny, R. J., Mellich, T. A. and Chen J. (2014). Mineral Nutrition of Adenium obesum ‘Red’ Hortscience, 49(12), 1518–1522.
Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
Paul, D., Biswas, K. and Sinha, S. K. (2015). Biological Activities of Adenium obesum (Forssk) Roem. & Schult.: A Concise Review. Malaya Journal of Biosciences, 2(4), 214-220.
Plaizier, A. C. (1980). A revision of Adenium Roem. AndSchult. and of Diplorhynchus Welw. Ex Fic. AndHiern (Apocynaceae). Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool., 80, 1–40.
Roy and Fatmi (2022). Impact of Grafting Techniques on Success Rate, Survival and Growth of Different Adenium (Adenium obesum) Scions under Prayagraj Agro-climatic Conditions. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 34(22), 1677-1683.
Sankari, A., Anand, M., Arulmozhiyan, R. and Kayalvizhi, K. (2016). Performance of heliconia cultivars for yield and quality under Eastern ghats. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 7(4), 1079-1083.
Shahrin, S., Roni, M. Z. K., Taufique, T., Mehraj, H. and Jamal Uddin, A. F. M. (2015). Study on flowering characteristics and categorization of rose cultivars for color, fragrance and usage. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 4(01), 20-30.
Sugapriya, S., Mathad, J. C., Patil, A. A., Hegde, R. V., Lingaraju, S. and Biradar, M. S. (2012). Evaluation of Dendrobium orchids for growth and yield grown under greenhouse. Karnataka. J. Agric. Sci., 25(1), 104-107.
Sindhuja, M., Singh, A., Kapadiya, C., Bhandari, A. J., Shah, H. P. and Patel, A. I. (2020). Evaluation of Adenium genotypes for physiochemicaland flowering characters. Int. J. Chem. Studies, 8(4), 3840-3844.
Sindhuja, M., Singh, A., Bhandari, A. J., Shah H. P., Patel, A. I. and Parekh, V. (2022). Morphological characterization of different genotypes of adenium. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 79(3), 296-304.
Singh, A., Bhandari, A. J., Chavan, S. K., Patel, N. B., Patel, A. I. and Patel, B. N. (2017). Evaluation of Adenium obesum for potted ornamentals under soilless growing system. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 6(12), 2141-2146.
Singh A., Chavan, S. K., Bhandari, A. J. and Patel, B. N. (2018). Production of Adenium Potted Ornamentals under Protected Cultivation, New Age Protected Cultivation, 4(1), 14-16.
Singh A., Chavan, S. K., Bhandari, A. J., Parekh, V. B., Shah, H. P. and Patel, B. N. (2019). New Multipetalous Variety G. Ad.1 of Adenium obesum. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 8 (7), 22319-7706.
Singh, A., Chavan, S. K., Bhandari, A. J., Parekh, V. B., Shah, H. P., Patel, A. I. and Patel, B. N. (2020). New multipetalous variety G. Ad.2 in Adenium obesum, Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 11(2), 346-350.
Singh, A., Patel, G. D., Bhandari, A. J. and Shah, H. P. (2023). Standardization of grafting technique in Adenium obesum (Forssk.) Roem. & Schult, Progressive Horticulture, 55(1), 62-67.
Varella,T. L., da Silva, G. M., Maximiliano, K. Z., Mikovski, A. I., da Silva Nunes, J. R., De Carvalho, I. F. and da Silva, M. L. (2015). In vitro germination of desert rose varieties. Ornamental Horticulture, 21(2), 227-234.
Versiani, M. A., Ahmeda, S. K.., Ikrama, A., Alia, S. T., Yasmeena, K. and Faizib, S. (2014). Chemical Constituents and Biological Activities of Adenium obesum (Forssk.) Roem. & Schult. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 11(6), 171-180.