Author:
Rajwanti Saran1* and S.K. Jain2
Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(6): 59-63, 2025
Address:
1Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur (Rajasthan), India.
2Professor & Head, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur (Rajasthan), India.
(Corresponding author: Rajwanti Saran*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.6.10
Cowpea, heritability and genetic advance.
Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] is a nutritionally rich, drought-tolerant legume cultivated widely in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, especially in Asia and Africa. In India, it serves as a vital component of farming systems due to its multipurpose uses-ranging from food grain, fodder, and green manure to soil fertility enhancement through biological nitrogen fixation. Cowpea grains are a valuable source of protein (23-25%), carbohydrates, vitamins, and essential amino acids, making it a key food security crop, particularly for resource-poor farmers (Singh et al., 2021). Despite its potential, the productivity of cowpea in many regions remains sub-optimal due to limitations in genetic improvement and low adoption of improved varieties. Enhancing seed yield and its contributing traits through breeding requires a thorough understanding of the underlying genetic architecture of these traits. Parameters such as heritability and genetic advance are essential tools for assessing the efficiency of selection in crop improvement programs. Heritability estimates the proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to genetic variance, whereas genetic advance indicates the expected improvement under selection pressure (Burton & DeVane 1953; Johnson et al., 1955).
The presence of significant variability in cowpea germplasm for traits such as days to flowering, plant height, number of pods per plant, seed size and seed yield per plant provides ample scope for genetic improvement. Estimating heritability along with genetic advance is crucial to determine the selection efficiency of these traits. High heritability coupled with high genetic advance indicates additive gene action and justifies selection-based breeding. On the other hand, low heritability and low genetic advance may suggest the predominance of non-additive gene effects or strong environmental influence (Falconer & Mackay 1996). Given the significance of cowpea in rainfed agriculture and marginal lands, it is imperative to identify and promote genotypes with high genetic potential for yield and other agronomic traits. This study aims to estimate the heritability and genetic advance of seed yield and its contributing traits across diverse cowpea crosses, thereby aiding breeders in devising efficient selection strategies for yield enhancement under varying environmental conditions.
The experiment material consists of six generations i.e., P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1 and BC2 of four crosses (Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD10, RC101 × TEML-84-1, CPD13 × GC3, IC8966 × CAZC10) involving eight diversified cultivars of cowpea. The parental seed material for this research was collected from Division of Plant Breeding and Genetics, RARI, Durgapura. All the 4 F1 crosses were raised during summer 2021 and allowed to self-pollination to produce F2 population. Simultaneously, F1’s were backcrossed with their respective parents (P1 and P2) to get backcross generations (BC1 and BC2). The evaluation trial was conducted during Kharif 2021 to evaluate all the six generations of each single cross in a randomized block design with three replications. The following 14 significant yield characteristics were observed: Days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height (cm), number of primary branches per plant, number of clusters per plant, 100-seed weight (g), seed yield per plant (g), biological yield per plant (g), harvest index (%) and protein content (%). The analysis of variance was performed using the treatment data to determine the genotypic variability. The broad and narrow sense heritability in percent was calculated by using formula suggested by Burton and Devane (1953) and estimation of expected genetic advance suggested by Johnson et al. (1955).
In crop improvement, the genetic component of variation is the cornerstone of effective breeding, as it is the only component that can be passed on to subsequent generations. The estimates of heritability were categorised as high (>50%), moderate (20 to 50%) and low (<20%) as per the standard given by Stansfield (1969). The values of expected genetic advance as percentage of mean for various characters is demarcated into three categories viz., low (<10%), moderate (10 to 20%) and high (>20%) as per the method given by Johnson et al. (1955).
The heritability estimates for days to 50% flowering were moderate to high in most crosses, with the highest broad-sense and narrow-sense heritability observed in the cross IC8966 × CAZC-10 (73.84% and 72.65% respectively) (Table 1). This finding aligns with the results of Pathak et al. (2017), who reported strong genetic control over flowering time in their crosses. However, the cross CPD13 × GC3 showed slightly lower narrow-sense heritability in this study suggests that non-additive genetic effects may play a role in the expression of this trait, which concurs with the observations of Khanpara et al. (2016), who also found that both additive and non-additive gene effects influenced flowering time in their study. For days to maturity, high heritability estimates were observed for both broad and narrow-sense heritability, especially in CPD13 × GC3 (85.20% broad sense and 79.09% narrow sense) and RC101 × TEML-84-1 (83.04% broad sense and 67.16% narrow sense) (Table 1). These findings are in agreement with those of Sabale et al. (2018), who reported high heritability for maturity traits in their crop improvement studies. However, despite the high heritability, the observed moderate genetic advance across all crosses suggests that the trait may not respond as effectively to selection, a result also noted by Santos et al. (2024), who attributed limited response to selection for maturity due to the influence of environmental factors.
In the case of plant height, high broad-sense heritability was observed in all crosses, particularly in Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 (88.59%) and CPD13 × GC3 (88.34%). These results are consistent with findings by Swathi et al. (2024), who observed high heritability for plant height in their experiments. The high genetic advance (above 50%) in several crosses, particularly in IC8966 × CAZC-10 (63.70%) and Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 (63.01%) (Table 1), indicates that plant height is primarily controlled by additive genetic factors, making it amenable to selection, as suggested by Vinay et al. (2022). These findings highlight the potential for significant genetic improvement in plant height through effective selection. For the number of primary branches per plant, moderate to high broad-sense heritability was observed, with the highest genetic advance recorded in CPD13 × GC3 (63.72%). This supports the conclusions of Khanpara et al. (2016), who identified high heritability for branch number in their work and suggested that this trait can be improved through selection. The strong genetic advance in certain crosses further corroborates the findings of Verma et al. (2019), who also observed that traits with high heritability and genetic advance can be effectively selected for in breeding programs. The number of clusters per plant showed moderate to high heritability, with the highest broad-sense heritability in Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 (62.41%). This is consistent with the findings of Pathak et al. (2017), who reported moderate to high heritability for the number of clusters in their studies. The high genetic advance (65.42%) observed in this study indicates that the number of clusters is primarily influenced by additive genetic effects, supporting the conclusions of Swathi et al. (2024), who highlighted the potential for genetic improvement in this trait through selection.
The broad-sense heritability for number of pods per cluster was generally low to moderate, ranging from 19.45% (RC 101 × TEML-84-1) to 59.25% (IC8966 × CAZC-10). However, most of crosses showed high narrow-sense heritability, such as Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD 10 (89.57%), RC 101 × TEML-84-1 (78.12%), and CPD13 × GC 3 (75.06%). Crosses such as RC 101 × TEML-84-1 (111.02%), Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD 10 (95.51%), and CPD 13 × GC 3 (73.35%) demonstrated high genetic advance, implying that direct selection would be highly effective for improving the number of pods per cluster in these combinations.
Table 1: Estimates of heritability and genetic advance for days to 50 % flowering, days to maturity, plant height, number of primary branches per plant, number of cluster per plant, number of pods per cluster and number of pods per plant in four cowpea crosses.
Crosses | Heritability (Broad sense) (%) | Heritability (Narrow sense) (%) | Genetic advance | Genetic advance (% of mean) |
Days to 50 % flowering | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 49.16 | 38.47 | 1.59 | 4.37 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 68.68 | 42.21 | 2.47 | 6.18 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 69.93 | 31.09 | 1.97 | 4.28 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 73.84 | 72.65 | 5.01 | 12.97 |
Day to maturity | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 79.03 | 65.28 | 4.87 | 7.76 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 83.04 | 67.16 | 6.79 | 9.92 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 85.20 | 79.09 | 10.60 | 14.12 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 67.19 | 34.52 | 3.19 | 5.06 |
Plant height | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 88.59 | 57.69 | 23.08 | 63.01 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 76.31 | 42.38 | 17.31 | 28.25 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 88.34 | 47.00 | 14.13 | 47.10 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 58.39 | 63.48 | 23.30 | 63.70 |
Number of primary branches per plant | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 42.66 | 39.84 | 2.02 | 56.27 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 27.75 | 2.45 | 0.11 | 2.97 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 56.58 | 43.19 | 2.65 | 63.72 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 59.95 | 30.81 | 1.68 | 45.57 |
Number of cluster per plant | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 62.41 | 47.44 | 4.51 | 45.09 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 58.30 | 54.91 | 6.67 | 65.42 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 60.03 | 17.53 | 1.51 | 15.45 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 43.64 | 25.03 | 1.88 | 21.53 |
Number of pods per cluster | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 35.94 | 89.57 | 2.13 | 95.51 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 19.45 | 78.12 | 3.05 | 111.02 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 50.18 | 75.06 | 2.02 | 73.35 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 59.25 | 8.27 | 0.28 | 9.11 |
Number of pods per plant | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 67.16 | 45.62 | 9.64 | 43.98 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 57.22 | 75.42 | 19.08 | 71.25 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 54.23 | 35.79 | 8.47 | 31.83 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 24.07 | 7.64 | 1.40 | 5.50 |
Both pod number per plant and pod length exhibited moderate to high heritability, with corresponding high genetic advance in most crosses (Table 1 & 2). IC8966 × CAZC-10 (44.65%) showed high genetic advance for pod length, which is consistent with findings by Verma et al. (2019) who reported a significant genetic component influencing pod length in their study. High heritability for both traits across most crosses suggests that selection would be effective, particularly for pod number per plant, where additive gene action predominates (Khanpara et al., 2016). The 100-seed weight showed exceptionally high broad-sense heritability in all crosses, particularly in CPD 13 × GC 3 (89.80%) (Table 2). The high genetic advance observed for Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD 10 (44.83%) and IC8966 × CAZC-10 (40.32%) implying that direct selection would be highly effective for improving this trait.
The seed yield per plant showed exceptionally high broad-sense heritability in all crosses, particularly in IC8966 × CAZC-10 (91.63%) (Table 2), aligning with the results of Vinay et al. (2022), who also found high heritability for seed yield in their crosses. The high genetic advance observed (77.26% for IC8966 × CAZC-10) further emphasizes that this trait is largely governed by additive genetic factors, and selection for seed yield in this cross would likely be highly effective, similar to findings by Santos et al. (2024). The harvest index demonstrated high broad-sense heritability, with significant genetic advance in crosses such as Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 (64.25%) and RC101 × TEML-84-1 (68.89%), confirming the results of Sabale et al. (2018), who observed high heritability for harvest index in their research. The genetic advance and heritability values indicate that selection for this trait can be successful, particularly in crosses with strong additive genetic effects. For seed protein content, high broad-sense heritability was observed, with IC8966 × CAZC-10 showing the highest values (89.57%) (Table 2). Narrow-sense heritability was lower, indicating a greater role for non-additive gene effects, which aligns with the findings of Verma et al. (2019), who also reported lower narrow-sense heritability for protein content. This suggests that while selection may still be possible, the effectiveness of selection for protein content may be more limited due to the significant influence of non-additive genetic effects. The findings of this study corroborate and extend the results of previous studies by Khanpara et al. (2016); Pathak et al. (2017); Sabale et al. (2018); Verma et al. (2019); Vinay et al. (2022); Santos et al. (2024); Swathi et al. (2024). The results of this study indicate that traits such as plant height, seed yield, and harvest index are under strong genetic control and could be effectively improved through selection, particularly where additive genetic effects predominate. Traits like days to maturity and seed protein content, while heritable, may require more strategic selection strategies, as non-additive gene effects play a significant role in their expression. These findings provide valuable insights for crop improvement programs aiming to enhance productivity and nutritional quality.
Table 2: Estimates of heritability and genetic advance for pod length, number of seeds per pod, 100-seed weight, seed yield per plant, biological yield per plant, harvest index and seed protein content in four cowpea crosses.
Crosses | Heritability (Broad sense) (%) | Heritability (Narrow sense) (%) | Genetic advance | Genetic advance (% of mean) |
Pod length | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 72.89 | 60.48 | 4.45 | 35.69 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 61.13 | 42.26 | 2.46 | 21.03 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 78.15 | 52.46 | 3.89 | 30.56 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 71.16 | 74.32 | 5.61 | 44.65 |
Number of seeds per pod | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 61.90 | 15.40 | 1.40 | 11.63 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 46.11 | 21.47 | 1.89 | 16.76 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 52.69 | 35.21 | 2.91 | 25.93 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 58.74 | 33.88 | 3.06 | 25.75 |
100-seed weight | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 81.64 | 69.52 | 5.27 | 44.83 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 80.96 | 62.39 | 4.14 | 33.88 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 89.80 | 48.96 | 4.24 | 35.89 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 58.36 | 54.36 | 5.38 | 40.32 |
Seed yield per plant | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 80.68 | 55.27 | 9.32 | 35.13 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 35.61 | 24.16 | 4.80 | 16.02 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 78.01 | 38.57 | 7.37 | 23.85 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 91.63 | 74.18 | 16.42 | 77.26 |
Biological yield per plant | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 94.47 | 78.20 | 44.79 | 87.28 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 82.94 | 46.11 | 26.67 | 30.28 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 89.69 | 39.69 | 25.06 | 29.27 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 90.62 | 64.74 | 39.24 | 54.33 |
Harvest index | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 87.87 | 68.22 | 33.52 | 64.25 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 73.53 | 42.01 | 24.52 | 68.89 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 85.54 | 62.15 | 20.36 | 55.68 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 90.67 | 78.68 | 27.69 | 53.06 |
Seed protein content | ||||
Sel 152 Gujarat × CPD-10 | 82.56 | 42.82 | 2.19 | 9.47 |
RC-101 × TEML-84-1 | 61.38 | 53.00 | 3.41 | 15.06 |
CPD-13 × GC-3 | 83.12 | 79.73 | 3.76 | 15.42 |
IC8966 × CAZC-10 | 89.57 | 84.13 | 5.15 | 21.47 |
The promising hybrids/genotypes identified in this study can be used in future breeding programs and direct selection based on characters studied would be effective in further improvement for developing high yielding varieties of cowpea.
Burton, G. W. and DeVane, E. H. (1953). Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agronomy Journal, 45(10), 478–481.
Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (4th ed.). Pearson Education Ltd.
Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 47(7), 314–318.
Khanpara, A. P., Gohil, S. B. and Rana, B. K. (2016). Genetic variability and heritability studies in vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(1), 33-37.
Khanpara, M. D., Dobariya, K. L., Ponkia, H. P. and Parmar, S. K. (2016b). Genetic analysis of earliness and yield contributing traits in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Legume Research, 39(3), 432–436.
Pathak, H., Patel, A. M. and Mehta, C. S. (2017). Heterosis, inbreeding depression, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield components in cowpea. Legume Research, 40(5), 787-791.
Sabale, V. A., Chavan, A. P. and Pawar, V. T. (2018). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance studies in F2 generation of cowpea. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(8), 1234-1241.
Santos, S. P. dos, Araújo, M. dos S., Aragão, W. F. L. de, Damasceno-Silva, K. J. and Rocha, M. M. de M. (2024). Genetic analysis of yield component traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 24(1), e46432413.
Singh, R., Yadav, R. S. and Kumar, A. (2021). Genetic variability and character association in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) for yield and yield-related traits. Legume Research, 44(10), 1234-1240.
Stansfield, W. D. (1969). Theory and problems of Genetics. Publ. by McGraw Hill Book Company, New York.
Swathi, N., Rani, G. U., Kumar, S. S. and Reddy, M. T. (2024). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance studies in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Journal of Legume Research, 47(1), 15–20.
Verma, O. P., Dwivedi, D. K. and Mishra, R. K. (2019). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for earliness and yield traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(2), 2772–2775.
Vinay, K., Jagan, M. R. P., Sandhya Kishore, N., and Hari, Y. (2022). Genetic variability studies for seed yield and yield component traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 13(2), 544-548.
Rajwanti Saran and S.K. Jain (2025). Heritability and Genetic Advance Analysis for Seed Yield and its Contributing Traits in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Biological Forum, 17(6): 59-63.