Author:
Santosh Kumari1*, Manisha2, Shivali Dhiman2 and Anubha Saini2
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(3): 95-100, 2024
Address:
1Senior Scientist, Department of Vegetable Science, College of Horticulture & Forestry, Neri, Hamirpur (Himachal Pradesh), India.
2PG Scholar, Department of Vegetable Science, College of Horticulture & Forestry, Neri, Hamirpur (Himachal Pradesh), India.
(Corresponding author: Santosh Kumari*)
DOI: -
Radish is a major root vegetable widely cultivated in tropical and temperate areas of the world. Evaluating the influence of organic manures and biofertilizers on growth and yield of radish is important for improving soil health. 17 treatment combinations comprised organic manures viz., FYM and vermicompost along with biofertilizers such as Azotobacter and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Although more yield was obtained in treatment receiving the recommended dose of fertilizer but continuous use of chemical fertilizers at higher amounts has a negative impact on the soil health. Combined application of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and FYM was found best for growth and yield parameters. Combined use of organic manures and biofertilizer not only helps in improving the yield and quality of crops but also helps in reducing soil and water pollution.
Radish is a major root vegetable that is widely cultivated in both tropical and temperate areas of the world. It belongs to the Brassicaceae family and diploid chromosome numbers are 18. It originated from Central, Western China and India (Monika et al., 2022). Radish is mainly a cool-season vegetable, but the Asiatic types of cultivars can tolerate higher temperatures than the European type of cultivars. It is cultivated for its young tender tuberous root and is eaten either raw as a salad or cooked as vegetable. Radish is an important dietary component of human daily food. Radish is low in calories and a good source of vitamin C, protein, fat, minerals, fiber, and carbohydrates (Singh and Nath 2012). The presence of volatile isothiocyanates causes the characteristic pungent flavor of radish.
Radish roots are an excellent appetizer. Different preparations of radish are useful in the healing of gall bladder and liver problems. As a diuretic and laxative, juice from fresh leaves is helpful (Khede et al., 2019). The high nutritional value of radish is found to be very useful in patients with piles, hepatic disorders, increased spleen, and jaundice (Brar and Nandpuri 1972). Application of fertilizers by farmers without information regarding soil fertility status and crop requirement for nutrients adversely affect both crop and the soil (Ray et al., 2000). Because of the higher cost of synthetic fertilizers and their contribution to poor health of water and soil, it becomes imperative to go for alternative and cheaper sources like organic 2 manures (Kumar et al., 2014). Organic farming primarily focuses on the use of plant residues and manures in agriculture. Other than chemical fertilizers, there are many organic materials such as FYM, mustard oil cake, vermicompost, poultry manure and bio-slurry that are made up of many plant nutrients that improve the physical and chemical properties of soil which are necessary for the plant (Pandey et al., 2024). Organic manures increase water holding capacity and improve the nutrient supply of the soil. Besides improving the fertilizer use efficiency and microbial population of soil, it reduces the nitrogen loss due to the slow release of nutrients. Organic fertilizer, compost, vermicompost, biofertilizer and low-dose chemical fertilizer applications improve the production parameters of radish and dry matter production (Subramani et al., 2010; Imthiyas and Seran 2015; Kiran et al., 2016).
Biofertilizers containing living cells of various types of microorganisms that colonize the rhizosphere or the interior of the plant when applied to seed, plant surface, or soil and promote growth by converting nutritionally important elements such as nitrogen and phosphorous from unavailable to available form through biological processes such as nitrogen fixation and rock phosphate solubilization (Basnet et al., 2021). Azotobacter and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria play a vital role in sustaining both soil health and crop production on a long-term basis, ensuring the availability of major nutrients (Wani et al., 2023). Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms such as Azotobacter generate ammonia for their use and provide the plants with nitrogen as an exchange for carbon and protected habitat. Azotobacter besides nitrogen fixation is well known for the IAA production capability. Use of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria has been reported to improve root yield and radish productivity (Chattopadhyay et al., 2007). Radish is a short-term crop and the proper use of bio-fertilizers is very important to achieve the maximum and excellent root quality and yield.
The research was carried out during rabi season, 2020 at Experimental Farm of Department of Vegetable Science, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Neri, Hamirpur, H.P. at an altitude of 650 m above mean sea level between 31° 41′47.6″N & 72° 28′6.3″E. The climate of the region is characterized as subtropical, with hot summers and mild to cool winters. Generally, December and January are coldest months, while May and June are hottest month. Majority of precipitation is received during monsoon period i.e. from June to September. The experiment comprised of seventeen treatments viz., [FYM (100 q/ha)], [Vermicompost (50 q/ha)], [Jeevamrit (drenching @ 10 %)], [Azotobacter], [Azotobacter + FYM (100 q/ha)], [Azotobacter + Vermicompost (50 q/ha)], [Azotobacter + Jeevamrit (drenching @ 10 %)], [Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria], [Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM (100 q/ha)], [Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Vermicompost (50 q/ha)], [Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Jeevamrit (drenching @ 10 %)], [Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria], [Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM (100 q/ha)], [Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Vermicompost (50 q/ha)], [Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Jeevamrit (drenching @ 10 %)], [Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (100N:48P:36K kg/ha)] and [Control].
These treatments were combination of organic manures along with biofertilizers such as Azotobacter and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria. The radish variety Japanese White was arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications having plot size of 1.2 m × 1.0 m with 30 × 10 cm spacing accommodating 40 plants per plot. The experimental field was thoroughly ploughed 1-2 times. Deep ploughing was done to bring the soil to a fine tilth and all the clods of the soil were thoroughly broken. All the stubble and weeds were removed. Plots were prepared according to the layout plan. Calculated amount of inorganic fertilizers Nitrogen, Phosphorous and potassium (100:48:36 kg/ha) were applied in the form of urea (217.39 kg/ha), SSP (300 kg/ha) and MOP (60 kg/ha) in respective treatments before sowing of seed. Half dose of N along with the full doses of P and K were applied as basal dose. Remaining half dose of N was split into two equal doses. The first dose was applied at the time of first earthing up and second dose was applied one month after the application of first dose. Organic manures such as FYM (100 q/ha) and vermicompost (50 q/ha) were applied during field preparation in the respective treatments. Seeds were treated with biofertilizers viz., Azotobacter and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria prior to sowing as per the treatments. Seeds were inoculated with Azotobacter culture, Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria culture and Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria culture as per treatments. Seeds were soaked in Jaggery solution for 15-20 minutes and seeds were dried under shade. Thereafter, these seeds were coated with Azotobacter culture @ 25 g/kg, Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria @ 25 g/kg and mixed culture of Azotobacter and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria as per treatments. Treated seeds were dried in shade before planting. Jeevamrit (@ 10 % drenching) was given at fortnight interval in the respective treatments. Sowing was done on 8th October 2020. Seeds were sown on the ridges at a spacing of 30 × 10 cm. First irrigation was done immediately after sowing. Irrigate the crop once in 6-7 days to retain optimum soil moisture, depending upon weather conditions. The thinning operation was performed twice to remove sick and overcrowded seedlings. The first thinning was performed after 15 days of sowing mainly to remove overcrowded, unhealthy and lanky seedlings. The second thinning was carried out 10 days after the first thinning to maintain optimum space of 10 cm between the two plants. Weeding was done manually on a regular basis to keep the plot free from weeds and to keep the soil loose and airy. Two shallow weeding were done to keep the field free from weeds. Earthing up was done twice, first 30 days after sowing and second after 40 days of sowing to cover the bulge out radish root to protect it from direct sunlight. The crop was harvested at full maturity when soil moisture was optimum. The roots of the radish were pulled out of the plots without damaging the roots. The soil adhering to the roots was removed.
Observations were recorded for days to marketable maturity, plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, leaf length (cm), leaf breadth (cm), root weight (g), root length (cm), root diameter (cm), fresh weight of the plant (g), root yield per plot (kg) and crown diameter (cm). The mean values of data were subjected to analysis of variance as described by Gomez and Gomez (1984) for Randomized Complete Block Design.
A. Growth and yield parameters
The days to marketable maturity is a significant trait for any crop, because it shows the time period at which the crop attains maturity. Harvesting at the right time is critical because harvesting too early or too late will result in a significant loss in yield and quality of radish roots. The data recorded on days to marketable maturity is presented in Table 1. The results revealed that treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) was earliest in terms of marketable maturity (60.00 days) due to quick release of N, P, K to the soil and their quick uptake by plants which resulted in early maturity of crop as compared to combined application of organic manures and biofertilizers (Shesharao, 2014). Plant height increased significantly with respect to different treatments of organic manures and biofertilizers. Maximum plant height (49.46 cm) was recorded with treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 1) may be due to a better nutritional environment in the root zone for plant growth and development. Nitrogen and Phosphorous are major nutrients needed for the plant's metabolism to function properly. The response of recommended dose of fertilizer was more pronounced compared to organic manures and this may be due to the proper supply of nutrients which create favourable nutritional conditions for better growth and development of plant (Jat et al., 2017; Khatri et al., 2019).
Number of leaves per plant (15.26) was obtained maximum by the treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 1). Kiran et al. (2016) stated that N, P, K based fertilizers provided readily available nutrients as compared to organic manures, which resulted in increased vegetative growth. Highest leaf length (29.76 cm) was recorded in treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 1). Islam et al. (2011) observed that when N, P, K based fertilizers were applied; the plants received more readily available nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium which may have increased the vegetative growth and leaf length. Maximum (8.40 cm) leaf breadth was obtained in treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 1). The N, P, K based fertilizers enhanced the soil fertility which promoted plant growth, thus causing increased leaf breadth of plants.
Table 1: Effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on days to marketable maturity, plant height, number of leaves per plant, leaf length and leaf breadth.
Treatment Code | Treatment Details | Days to Marketable maturity | Plant height(cm) | Number of leaves per plant | Leaf length (cm) | Leaf breadth (cm) |
T1 | FYM (100q/ha) | 68.33 | 42.16 | 12.20 | 25.26 | 6.13 |
T2 | Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 68.66 | 40.73 | 12.06 | 24.33 | 6.10 |
T3 | Jeevamrit (drenching@ 10%) | 68.66 | 40.16 | 12.00 | 24.00 | 6.10 |
T4 | Azotobacter | 68.33 | 40.66 | 12.26 | 24.53 | 6.23 |
T5 | Azotobacter + FYM(100q/ha) | 65.33 | 44.40 | 14.13 | 26.96 | 6.80 |
T6 | Azotobacter + Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 65.66 | 44.00 | 13.86 | 26.80 | 6.83 |
T7 | Azotobacter + Jeevamrit (drenching@10 %) | 65.33 | 43.40 | 13.73 | 26.10 | 6.73 |
T8 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria | 68.33 | 41.46 | 12.53 | 24.56 | 6.23 |
T9 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM (100q/ha) | 63.33 | 48.61 | 14.73 | 27.91 | 8.20 |
T10 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 64.00 | 45.49 | 14.33 | 26.35 | 7.96 |
T11 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Jeevamrit (drenching@10%) | 64.66 | 44.02 | 14.00 | 25.86 | 7.16 |
T12 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria | 67.66 | 42.28 | 12.73 | 25.35 | 6.40 |
T13 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM (100q/ha) | 63.33 | 48.72 | 14.60 | 28.23 | 8.13 |
T14 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Vermicompost (50 q/ha) | 63.66 | 47.93 | 14.40 | 27.93 | 8.00 |
T15 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Jeevamrit (drenching@ 10%) | 64.00 | 45.62 | 14.13 | 27.43 | 7.56 |
T16 | Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (100N:48P: 36 K kg/ha) | 60.00 | 49.46 | 15.26 | 29.76 | 8.40 |
T17 | Control | 69.00 | 38.76 | 11.60 | 23.06 | 5.98 |
Mean | 65.78 | 43.99 | 13.44 | 26.14 | 6.99 | |
CD(0.05) | 4.75 | 3.31 | 0.74 | 1.84 | 0.43 |
Maximum root weight (169.46 g) was recorded in treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 2). The higher amount of readily available nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium moreover, their uptake may have increased radish fresh root weight. Maximum root length (20.79 cm) was recorded by the treatment T9 (Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM) (Table 2). This increase could be due to the incorporation of bio-fertilizers viz., Azotobacter and Phosphorous Solubilizing Bacteria which play a significant role in improving soil fertility and yield attributes like root length, root breadth and thus final vegetable yield (Khede et al., 2019). Meena et al. (2022) reported that inorganic fertilizer had a significant influence on the root weight and the number of leaves in the radish plant, although the inorganic fertilizer had no significant impact on the length of the radish root. Root diameter (3.90 cm) was observed maximum in treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 2) due to the supply of readily available nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium from RDF to the plants. Makinde (2013) noted an increase in the readily available nitrate from the NPK fertilizer, which the crops can easily utilize.
Maximum fresh weight of plant (238.40 g) was observed in treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 2). Data indicated that incorporation of recommended dose of NPK and manures significantly improved fresh root weight of radish. Moreover, the availability of higher amount of readily available nutrients through Recommended Dose of Fertilizer and their uptake, which could have increased fresh weight of plant as reported by Meena et al. (2022); Jat et al. (2017). Maximum root yield per plot (4.20 kg) was obtained in treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 2) due the application of 100 % of the recommended dose of nitrogen and phosphorous favoured auxin and metabolic activities in plants which ultimately resulted in increased root yield as reported by Meena et al. (2022); Ram et al. (2001). Crown diameter (2.08) was recorded maximum with treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (Table 2) due to readily availability of nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium from the recommended dose of fertilizers to the plants.
Economics: Data for economic of radish cultivation viz., total cost of cultivation, gross income, net income and cost: benefit ratio of different treatment is presented in Table 3. Among different treatments maximum gross income of Rs. 2,45,000/ha was obtained with treatment T16 (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) followed by Rs.2,43,250/ha in treatment T9 (Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM) while, minimum gross income (Rs.1,06,160) was obtained with treatment T17 (Control). Maximum net income (Rs. 1,76,810/ha) was recorded by treatment T9 (Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM) followed by Rs. 1,74,470/ha in treatment T13 (Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM) whereas, minimum net income (Rs.24,370/ha) was recorded by treatment T2 (Vermicompost). Highest B: C ratio (2.66) was recorded by treatment T9 (Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM) followed by treatment T13 (Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM) recording B: C ratio of 2.62. Whereas, lowest B: C ratio (0.24) was recorded by treatment T2 (Vermicompost).
Table 2: Effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on root weight, root length, root diameter, fresh weight of plant, root yield per plot and crown diameter in radish.
Treatment code | Treatment Details | Root weight(g) | Root Length (cm) | Root Diameter (cm) | Fresh weight of plant (g) | Root yield per plot (kg) | Crown diameter (cm) |
T1 | FYM (100q/ha) | 110.73 | 16.90 | 2.94 | 137.60 | 2.11 | 1.48 |
T2 | Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 108.26 | 16.40 | 2.89 | 135.66 | 2.09 | 1.47 |
T3 | Jeevamrit (drenching@ 10%) | 106.00 | 16.16 | 2.80 | 134.80 | 2.04 | 1.39 |
T4 | Azotobacter | 106.13 | 16.13 | 3.00 | 136.83 | 2.06 | 1.49 |
T5 | Azotobacter + FYM (100q/ha) | 132.90 | 17.43 | 3.24 | 177.26 | 2.96 | 1.81 |
T6 | Azotobacter + Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 130.56 | 17.20 | 3.21 | 172.46 | 2.90 | 1.78 |
T7 | Azotobacter + Jeevamrit (drenching@10%) | 127.23 | 17.30 | 3.17 | 169.16 | 2.76 | 1.75 |
T8 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria | 112.26 | 16.90 | 3.08 | 144.63 | 2.09 | 1.54 |
T9 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM (100q/ha) | 164.00 | 20.79 | 3.49 | 215.06 | 4.17 | 1.96 |
T10 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 152.10 | 19.13 | 3.31 | 201.63 | 3.65 | 1.91 |
T11 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria+ Jeevamrit (drenching@ 10%) | 141.03 | 18.16 | 3.16 | 191.83 | 2.95 | 1.85 |
T12 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria | 119.20 | 16.93 | 3.10 | 158.67 | 2.39 | 1.65 |
T13 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM (100q/ha) | 160.33 | 20.49 | 3.41 | 208.96 | 4.13 | 1.94 |
T14 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria +Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 155.86 | 20.00 | 3.33 | 204.63 | 3.80 | 1.92 |
T15 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Jeevamrit (drenching@10 %) | 145.26 | 18.19 | 3.26 | 193.60 | 3.11 | 1.86 |
T16 | Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (100 N:48P: 36K kg/ha) | 169.46 | 19.70 | 3.90 | 238.40 | 4.20 | 2.08 |
T17 | Control | 102.33 | 15.70 | 2.46 | 131.16 | 1.82 | 1.32 |
Mean | 131.98 | 17.84 | 3.16 | 173.67 | 2.89 | 1.71 | |
CD(0.05) | 19.91 | 2.49 | 0.62 | 29.98 | 0.97 | 0.20 |
Table 3: Effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on economics of radish cultivation.
Sr. No. | Treatment details | Total root Yield (q/h) | Total cost of Cultivation (Rs/ha) | Gross Income (Rs/ha) | Net Income (Rs/ha) | B:C ratio |
T1 | FYM (100q/ha) | 123.08 | 65,540 | 1,23,080 | 57,540 | 0.87 |
T2 | Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 121.91 | 97,540 | 1,21,910 | 24,370 | 0.24 |
T3 | Jeevamrit (drenching@10%) | 119.00 | 66,040 | 1,19,000 | 52,960 | 0.80 |
T4 | Azotobacter | 120.16 | 48,040 | 1,20,160 | 72,120 | 1.50 |
T5 | Azotobacter + FYM (100q/ha) | 172.66 | 66,040 | 1,72,660 | 1,06,620 | 1.61 |
T6 | Azotobacter + Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 169.16 | 98,040 | 1,69,160 | 71,120 | 0.72 |
T7 | Azotobacter + Jeevamrit (drenching@10%) | 161.00 | 66,540 | 1,61,000 | 94,460 | 1.41 |
T8 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria | 121.91 | 47,940 | 1,21,910 | 73,970 | 1.54 |
T9 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM (100q/ha) | 243.25 | 66,440 | 2,43,250 | 1,76,810 | 2.66 |
T10 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 212.91 | 97,940 | 2,12,910 | 1,14,970 | 1.17 |
T11 | Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Jeevamrit (drenching@10%) | 172.08 | 66,440 | 1,72,080 | 1,05,640 | 1.59 |
T12 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria | 139.41 | 48,440 | 1,39,410 | 90,970 | 1.87 |
T13 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + FYM (100q/ha) | 240.91 | 66,440 | 2,40,910 | 1,74,470 | 2.62 |
T14 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Vermicompost (50q/ha) | 221.66 | 98,440 | 2,21,660 | 1,23,220 | 1.25 |
T15 | Azotobacter + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria + Jeevamrit (drenching @10%) | 181.41 | 66,940 | 1,81,410 | 1,14,470 | 1.71 |
T16 | Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (100N:48P: 36K kg/ha) | 245.00 | 71,213 | 2,45,000 | 1,73,787 | 2.44 |
T17 | Control | 106.16 | 47,540 | 1,06,160 | 58,620 | 1.23 |
Organic manures along with biofertilizers leads to sustainability in soil health and crop production on a long-term basis, ensuring the availability of major nutrients and may serve as alternative to mineral fertilizers for improving fertility of soil and yield of the crops.
Basnet, B., Aryal, A., Neupane, A., Bishal, K. C. and Basnet, M. (2021). Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of radish. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4(2), 167-174.
Brar, J. S. and Nandpuri K. S. (1972). Cultivation of root crops. Punjab Agriculture University Bulletin, pp.10-15.
Chattopadhyay, S. B., Sahu, P. K., Thapa, U. and Kumar, M. N. (2007). Effect of microbial amendments on root and seed yield of radish. Journal of Vegetable Science,12, 89-104.
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley& Sons, New York, p. 680.
Imthiyas, M. S. M. and Seran, T. H. (2015). Chemical fertilizers on the accumulation of dry matter in leaves of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 1, 1-4.
Islam, M. M., Karim, A., Jahiruddin, M., Majid, N. M., Miah, M. G., Ahmad, M. M. and Hakim M. A. (2011). Effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizers on crops in the radish-stem and amaranth-Indian spinach cropping pattern in homestead area. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 1370-1378.
Jat, P. K., Singh, S. P., Devi, S., Mahala, P. and Rolaniya, M. K. (2017). Performance of organic manures, inorganic fertilizer and plant density of yield and quality of radish. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 7, 261-266.
Khatri, K. B., Ojha, R. B., Pande, K. R. and Khanal, B. R. (2019). Effects of different sources of organic manures in growth and yield of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). International Journal of Applied Science and Biotechnology, 7, 39-42.
Khede, K., Kumawat, A. and Tembare, D. (2019). Effect of organic manures, fertilizers and their combinations on growth, yield and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cv. Japanese White. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8, 400-405.
Kiran, M., Jilani, M. S., Waseem, K. and Sohail, M. (2016). Effect of orgaicn manures and inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of radish. (Raphanus sativus L.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 363-372.
Kumar, S., Maji, S., Kumar S. and Singh, H. D. (2014). Efficacy of organic manures on growth and yield of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cv. Japanese White. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, 57-60.
Makinde, A. (2013). Effect of inorganic fertilizer on the growth and nutrient composition of moringa (Moringa oleifera). Journal of Emerging Trendsin Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4, 334-343.
Meena, R., Nath, V., and Singh, A. (2022). Response of integrated nutrient management on vegetative growth, yield, quality and economics of radish (Raphanus sativus) cv. Japanese White. Plant Archives, 22, 177-180.
Monika, Makhan Lal, V. P. S. Panghal and Amit V. (2022). Effect of manure and bio-fertilizers on seed yield and seedling characteristics of radish. Biological Forum–An International Journal, 14(1), 1661-1665.
Pandey, S., Lal, B. and Singh, P. (2024). Effect of organic and inorganic manures on growth, yield and economic return of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). AGBIR, 40(1), 783-786.
Ram, A., Lal, S., Malik, Y. S. and Baswana, K. S. (2001). Effect of nitrogen and zinc on radish (Raphanus sativus L.) under sodic water condition. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 4, 177-181.
Ray, P. K., Jana, A. K., Mitra, D. N., Saha, M. N., Choudhary, J., Saha, S. and Saha, A. R. (2000). Fertilizer prescription on soil test basis for jute, rice and wheat. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 48, 79-84.
Shesharao, R. D. (2014). Studies on effect of different organic manures on growth, yield and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Horticulture. Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, p.68.
Singh, D. N. and Nath, V. (2012). Winter Vegetables: Advances and Developments. Satish Serial Publishing House, Delhi pp. 869.
Subramani, A., Anburani, A. and Gayathiri, M. (2010). Response of growth parameters of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) to various organic nutrients and biostimulants. The Asian Journal of Horticulture, 5, 464-466.
Santosh Kumari, Manisha, Shivali Dhiman and Anubha Saini (2024). Impact of Bioinoculants and Organic Manures on Growth and Yield of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(3): 95-100.