Author:
Anjaneya Reddy B.1*, Mohan Kumar K.S.2, Noorulla Haveri3, Sreenatha A.3, Sudarshaan G.K.4, Seetharamu G.K.2 and Harish B.S.2
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(2): 51-56, 2024
Address:
1Regional Horticulture Research and Extension Center, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bengaluru (Karnataka), India.
2College of Horticulture, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bengaluru (Karnataka), India.
3College of Horticulture, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot (Karnataka), India.
4College of Horticulture, University of Horticultural Sciences, Mysuru (Karnataka), India.
(Corresponding author: Anjaneya Reddy B.*)
DOI: -
Sclerotium rolfsii, Percent disease incidence, Trichoderma harzianum, In- vitro, In-vivo, Management.
Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Ramat.), the golden flower, is one of the beautiful and oldest commercial flowering plants grown in different countries of the world and belongs to the family Asteraceae. In chrysanthemums, there are several species viz., Chrysanthemum grandiflorum, C. boreale, C. carinatum, C. coronarium, C. cinerariifolium, C. rubellum, C. satsumense, C. sibiricumetc, are ornamental and grown in gardens for their beautiful flowers. Among the diverse species, the autumn flowering garden chrysanthemum i.e., Chrysanthemum morifolium is commercially cultivated throughout the world, and recently it is renamed botanically as a Dendranthema grandiflora Tzevelev (Bhattacharjee, 2003).
The crop is being cultivated throughout the world as a cut flower, especially in countries like China, Japan, Europe, USA and India (Broerties et al., 1980). In India, the Chrysanthemum growing states are Karnataka, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Bihar. It is also cultivated around big cities like Delhi, Bengaluru, Kolkata, Allahabad, Lucknow and Kanpur, because mainly for the reason of beautification and exhibitions (Devaraja, 2011). In India, during 2017-18 the total cultivated area occupied by chrysanthemum was 20.09 thousand hectares and production of cut flowers and loose flowers was 185.24 MT and 14.94 MT, respectively (Anon., 2018). In Karnataka, chrysanthemum cultivated extensively in Bengaluru urban and Bengaluru rural, Ramanagara, Hassan, Mysuru, Tumakuru, Kolar, Chikballapura, Dharwad, Bellary and Belgaum districts with an area of 30,612 ha producing 2,33,377 MT and productivity of 7.62 tonnes per hectare during the year 2017-18 (Anon., 2018).
The stem rot caused by S. rolfsii, is a soil borne pathogen with more than 500 plant species as hosts including vegetable, flower, ornamental, pulse, oil seed and medicinal crops (Farr et al., 1989). The pathogen is a well-known polyphagous soil borne plant pathogenic fungus (Aycock, 1966), generally distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, where soil temperature prevails around 30 C (Harlapur, 1988). Several management options are available for control of soil borne stem rot disease. It is also important to evaluate novel fungicides and bio agents and identifying suitable molecules for managing the stem rot of chrysanthemum on regional basis. However, disease outbreaks of stem rot disease are still not uncommon. Presently, the stem rot disease is managed through application of chemical fungicides under in-vitro, and application of chemicals, biocontrol agents, organic amendments, under polyhouse conditions that have several concerns in the areas of environmental safety, pathogen resistance to fungicides, groundwater pollution and escalated costs. Notable success on disease control through the combined use of antagonistic microorganisms and fungicides have been experimented during recent years. In the present study, an effort is made to identify potential antagonists of Sclerotium rolfsii, efficiency of chemicals and their compatibility, when applied under in-vitro and in- vivo management for the newly reported pathogen from Karnataka, India.
A. Isolation and preservation of S. rolfsii infecting chrysanthemum
Freshly infected collar region and root region of chrysanthemum samples (Plate 1) collected from diseased fields were washed thoroughly, with sterile water. These were cut into small bits/pieces of 20-40 mm size with the help of sterilized blade and the same were surface sterilized in 0.1 per cent sodium hypochlorite solution for 1-2 minutes and washed three times consecutively in sterile distilled water to remove the traces of sodium hypochlorite. After surface sterilization, diseased specimens were kept in sterilized bags along with wet cotton under room temperature for about 8-10 days of incubation period, slight mycelial growth upon observation and that was transferred on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium. The inoculated plates were incubated at room temperature (25o C±2°C) for 3-5 days to facilitate growth of the fungus (Plate 2). The pure culture of Sclerotium rolfsii was obtained by hyphal tip culture technique and further maintained on PDA Petri plate incubated at 25ºC for further work.
B. Identification of Sclerotium rolfsii causing stem rot disease in chrysanthemum
The fungus was cultured on PDA plates for the detection of the pathogen. A white radiating mycelial mat was formed within seven days after incubation and covered the entire petri plate. Sclerotial bodies were developed at the periphery of the plates. The pathogenicity also was proved using giant culture and the culture was used for the subsequent studies.
C. In- vitro efficacy of fungicides by poisoned food technique
The efficacy of different chemicals was tested on PDA medium against S. rolfsii by poisoned food technique. Required concentrations of fungicides were prepared by dissolving a known quantity of fungicides in sterile distilled water separately under aseptic conditions. The poisoned medium was equally distributed into three Petri plates each, comprising 13 treatments. The mycelial growth of the pathogen S. rolfsii was cut into 5 mm discs from the periphery of actively growing colony with sterilized cork borer and transferred to the centre of each plate containing poisoned medium. Control was maintained by placing fungal discs in plates containing untreated medium. All the inoculated Petriplates were incubated at 28± 2ºC in BOD incubator. The diameters of fungal colonies in the treatments were measured when the growth in control plate was full. Per cent inhibition in the growth of the organism in different chemical treatments over the control was calculated. The percentage inhibition of radial growth was calculated by using equation:
Percentage of inhibition I = (C-T)/C × 100
Where, C= growth of pathogen in control, T = growth of pathogen in treatment
D. In-vivo management of stem rot disease of chrysanthemum caused by S. rolfsii under polyhouse conditions
The organic amendments, bioagents and few fungicides which were found effective under in vitro studies were evaluated under polyhouse conditions. Polyhouse studies were conducted at Department of Plant Pathology, College of Horticulture, Bengaluru, during 2019-2020. For the pot culture study sterilized soil was uniformly mixed with 10g inoculum of S. rolfsii which was grown in sand sorghum medium and filled in 40 × 35cm size pot. The soil was previously mixed with FYM, vermicompost, fungicides, bio–agents and organic amendments. For each treatment, three replications were maintained; Observations were recorded after 15 days of planting. Per cent disease incidence was calculated by using the formula given by Maiti and Sen (1979).
A. Isolation and preservation of S.rolfsii
The fungus produced white, dense, radiating mycelial growth on potato dextrose agar medium. In the early stages, the fungus produced white mycelium and gradually lost its luster and became somewhat dull in appearance. Aerial hyphae were not uniformly distributed. Formation of sclerotial bodies was observed from seventh day onwards after incubation. In the beginning, the sclerotial bodies were white which gradually turned to golden yellow, buff brown colour and then to chocolate brown colour at maturity. The fully matured sclerotial bodies were spherical to ellipsoidal and measured 0.5 mm to 0.70 mm in diameter. The culture was maintained at 4°C in the refrigerator for the subsequent study.
The experimental results presented in Table 1 revealed that, the per cent mean inhibition of stem rot pathogen differed significantly among the treatments. Among the contact fungicides-Captan 50%WP at 1000 ppm showed the highest inhibition per cent (79.41%) of mycelia growth (Plate 3a and Fig. 1). Among the systemic fungicides-Tebuconazole 25.9% EC showed 100% inhibition of mycelial growth at 100ppm itself followed by Propiconazole 25% EC showed 100% inhibition of mycelial growth at 300ppm (Plate 3b and Fig. 1) and among the combi-products Pyraclostrobin 133g/l + Epoxiconazole 50g/l SE, Carboxin 37.5% + Thiram 37.5% WP showed 100% inhibition of mycelial growth at 100ppm itself (Plate 3c and Fig. 1).
Table 1: In vitro efficacy of different fungicides against Sclerotium rolfsii causing stem rot of chrysanthemum.
Treatment No. | Chemical name | % Inhibition over control (*) | ||
10% recommended field concentration | 20% recommended field concentration | 30% recommended field concentration | ||
Contact fungicides | ||||
T1 | COC 50% WP @ 0.3% | 00.00 (0.28) * | 00.00 (0.28) | 00.00 (0.28) |
T2 | Copper hydroxide 75% WP@0.2% | 17.31 (24.58) | 20.24 (26.72) | 25.33 (30.21) |
T3 | Mancozeb 75% WP@0.2% | 34.16 (35.77) | 53.08 (46.77) | 60.16 (50.87) |
T4 | Captan 50% WP@0.2% | 64.28 (53.30) | 66.52 (54.50) | 79.41 (63.02) |
T5 | Chlorothalonil 75% WP@0.1% | 43.24 (41.12) | 50.27 (45.05) | 72.28 (58.23) |
Systemic fungicides | ||||
T6 | Propiconazole 25% EC@0.1% | 90.00 (71.66) | 95.00 (77.50) | 100 (89.71) |
T7 | Tebuconazole 25.9% EC@0.1% | 100 (89.71) | 100 (89.71) | 100 (89.71) |
T8 | Carbendazim 50% WP@0.2% | 00.00 (0.28) | 00.00 (0.28) | 00.00 (0.28) |
Combi products | ||||
T9 | Mancozeb 63% + Carbendazim 12% WP@0.2% | 42.16 (40.48) | 54.60 (47.64) | 71.58 (57.80) |
T10 | Carbendazim 25% + Mancozeb 50% WS@0.2% | 31.33 (34.03) | 52.28 (46.20) | 55.05 (47.90) |
T11 | Carboxin 37.5 + Thiram 37.5% WP@0.1% | 100 (89.71) | 100 (89.71) | 100 (89.71) |
T12 | Pyraclostrobin 133g/l + Epoxiconazole 50g/l SC@0.1% | 100 (89.71) | 100 (89.71) | 100 (89.71) |
T13 | Control | 00.00 (0.28) | 00.00 (0.28) | 00.00 (0.28) |
S. Em± | 0.943 | 1.257 | 0.419 | |
CD @ 1 % | 2.861 | 3.731 | 1.257 | |
Where, * indicates 10%, 20%, 30% of recommended dose of field concentration
The findings are in support with the results of Chavala and Thammasak (1986), Hari et al. (1989); Bhise (2002); Kaur and Gupta (2003); Anju and Varma (2007); Prabhu and Patil (2004); Kolte and Raut (2007), mancozeb and copper oxy-chloride were found to be less effective against S. rolfsii. Similarly, Bhat and Srivastava (2003) evaluated in vitro efficacy of captan, thiophanate-methyl and propiconazole at 250, 500 and 1000 ppm concentrations against S. rolfsii. The findings of the present study were also in agreement with the reports of, many workers (Prabhu and Hiremath 2003; Kulkarni, 2007; Arunasri et al., 2011) who reported that the Triazoles (Hexaconazole, Propiconazole, Difenoconazole) were highly inhibitive to the growth of S. rolfsii. The present results are also in agreement with the reports of Mukhopadhyay and Thakur (1971), showed that vitavax and chloroneb significantly reduced the growth of S. rolfsii. Chouhan (1978) reported that fungicides showed better inhibition of the soil borne fungal pathogen, the best inhibition of S. rolfsii was observed with calixin and vitavax. Patil and Rane (1982) demonstrated vitavax to be effective in inhibiting the growth of S. rolfsii. Vineela et al. (2017) evaluated the fungicides and reported that, vitavax power significantly inhibited the growth of S. rolfsii against groundnut stem rot. Triazole fungicides interfere with the ergosterol biosynthesis of the fungus, the results are in agreement with Vanitha and Suresh (2002).
Fig. 1. In-vitro evaluation of fungicides against S. rolfsii.
Fig. 2. In-vivo efficacy of different fungicides, organic amendments and bioagents stem rot of chrysanthemum.
B. In-vivo management of stem rot disease of chrysanthemum caused by S. rolfsii under polyhouse conditions
Table 2: Effect of different fungicides, organic amendments and bio-agents on the incidence of stem rot of chrysanthemum.
Treatments number | Treatments | Stem rot incidence (%) | Percent disease inhibited over control | |
T1 | Captan 50 %WP @0.3% | 40.00 (39.23) | 60.00 | |
T2 | Tebuconazole 25.9 % EC@ 0.1% | 00.00 (0.28) | 100.00 | |
T3 | Pyraclostrobin 133 g/l + Epoxiconazole 50 g/l SC @0.1% | 20.00 (26.56) | 80.00 | |
T4 | Trichoderma harzianum@10g/pl | 20.00 (26.56) | 80.00 | |
T5 | Pseudomonas fluorescens@10g/pl | 20.00 (26.56) | 80.00 | |
T6 | Pseudomonas putida@10g/pl | 40.00 (35.00) | 60.00 | |
T7 | Bacillus subtilis@10g/pl | 40.00 (39.23) | 60.00 | |
T8 | Neem cake @30 g/kg of soil | 00.00 (17.80) | 100.00 | |
T9 | Arka microbial consortium @5 ml/pl | 20.00 (26.56) | 80.00 | |
T10 | Control | 100.00(67.92) | ||
S. Em± | 4.919 | |||
CD@1% | 14.615 | |||
Anju, G. and Varma, R. K. (2007). Non-target effect of agro-chemicals and bio-control agents on important soil-borne pathogen of soybean. JNKVV. Res. J., 4(1), 65-71.
Anonymous (2018). Indian Horticulture Database (2017-18),www.nhb.gov.in/area-pro/database.
Arunasri, P., Chalam, T.V., Eswarareddy, N. P., Tirumalareddy, S. and Reddy, R. B. (2011). Investigations on fungicidal sensitivity of Trichoderma spp. and Sclerotium rolfsii (collar rot pathogen) in crossandra. Inter. J. Appl. Bio. Pharm. Tech., 2(2), 290-293.
Aycock, R. (1966). Stem rot and other diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. N C State Univ. Tech. Bull., 174, 202.
Bharathi, D. A. R. and Narayanaswamy (2018). Integrated management of stem rot of tuberose Polianthes tuberosa L. caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 1282-1283.
Bhat, N. and Srivastava, L. S. (2003). Evaluation of some fungicides and neem formulations against six soil-borne pathogens and three Trichoderma spp. in vitro. Plant Dis. Res., 18, 56-59.
Bhattacharjee, S. K. (2003). Advances in commercial floriculture. Avishkar publishers, distributors, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Bhise, Y. (2002). Studies on management of collar rot of chickpea caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. M. Sc. Thesis, JNKVV, Jabalpur, 52-57.
Broerties, C., Koene, P. and Van heen J. W. H. (1980). Chrysanthemum. Euphytica., 29, 523-530.
Chavala, B. and Tharmmasak, S. (1986). Evaluation of some fungicides to control mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia solani and three isolates of Sclerotium rolfsii in laboratory. King Mongkut’s Agric. J., 4(1), 34-36.
Chouhan, L. S. (1978). In vitro studies on the effect of certain fungicides on S. rolfsii. JNKVV Res. J., 12, 14.
Devaraja, O. (2011). Investigations on chrysanthemum leaf blight caused by Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).
Farr, D. F., Bills, G. F., Chamunis, F. P. and Rossama, A. Y. (1989). Fungi on plants and plant products in the United States. Amer. Phytopathol. Soc. St. Paul, Minnesota, 78-82.
Gandhi, V., Taya, R. S. and Kumar, A. (2017). Management of collar rot Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. in sunflower Helianthus annuus L. Indian J. Agric. Res., 51(6), 586-590.
Hari, B. V. S. C., Chirangieeri, V., Sitaramaiuh, K. and Subrahmanyam, K. (1989). In vitro screening of fungicides against isolate of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. by Soil vial technique. Pesticides, 23, 47-49.
Harlapur, S. I. (1988). Studies on some aspects of foot rot of wheat caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad. 70-75 pp.
Kaur, A. and Gupta, V. P. (2003). Evaluation of seed dressing fungicides for management of Sclerotium collar rot in lentil. Indian J. Pul. Res., 16(1), 75-76.
Kolte, V. S. and Raut, S. P. (2007). Efficacy of fungicides in management of collar rot of orchids incited by Sclerotium rolfsii. Annu. Plant Protection Sci., 15(2), 519-520.
Kulkarni, V. R. (2007). Epidemiology and integrated management of potato wilt caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Ph.D. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).
Maiti, S. and Sen, C. (1979). Fungal diseases of betelvine, PANS, 25, 150-157.
Mukhopadhyay, A. N. and Thakur, R. P. (1971). Control of sclerotium collar rot of sugar beet systemic fungicides. Plant Disease Reporter, 5(7), 630-633.
Patil, M. B. and Rane (1982). Incidence and control of Sclerotium wilt of groundnut. Pesticides, 23-24.
Prabhu, H. V. and Hiremath, P. C. (2003). Bio efficacy of fungicides against collar rot of cotton caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc, Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 16 (4), 576-579.
Prabhu, H. V. and Patil, P. V. (2004). Efficacy of chemical and biological seed dressers and host resistance in the management of collar rot of soybean caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Soybean Res., 2, 41-45.
Vanitha, S., and Suresh, M. (2002). Management of collar rot of brinjal (Sclerotium rolfsii) by non-chemical methods. South Indian Horti., 50(4-6), 602-606.
Anjaneya Reddy B., Mohan Kumar K.S., Noorulla Haveri, Sreenatha A., Sudarshaan G.K., Seetharamu G.K. and Harish B.S. (2024). In-vitro and In-vivo Management of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. causing Stem Rot in Chrysanthemum. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(2): 51-56.