Influence of Biochar Amended Media on Root Development and Microbial Dynamics in Guava Propagation

Author:

Nithiyasri S.1, Akino A.2*, Gopu B.3 and Anbukkarasi Kaliyaperumal4

Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(8): 80-85, 2025

Address:

1Post Graduate Researcher, Department of Fruit Science, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District- 603201, Tamil Nadu, India.

2Assistant Professor, Department of Fruit Science, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District- 603201, Tamil Nadu, India. 

3Associate Professor and Head, Department of Fruit Science, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District- 603201, Tamil Nadu, India.

4Associate Professor (Microbiology), Department of Natural Resource Management, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District- 603201, Tamil Nadu, India.

 (Corresponding author: Akino A.*)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.8.14

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Propagation through softwood cuttings often suffers from low rooting efficiency, largely due to suboptimal nursery media conditions. Traditional substrates, such as red soil, sand and FYM, lack of adequate water retention, aeration and microbial support. Incorporating organic amendments such as cocopeat, tank silt, red soil, sand and biochar, particularly biochar derived from guava waste, has shown promise in improving media quality. Biochar enhances root zone aeration, nutrient retention and microbial activity. Inspite of its potential, few studies have assessed biochar-enriched substrates for guava propagation.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different biochar-based media on rooting and early growth of guava softwood cuttings, to establish a more sustainable and efficient propagation method.

The experiment was conducted at the nursery of SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, located in Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India, which experiences a tropical climate conducive to nursery operations. A Completely Randomized Design (CRD) was adopted with 5 treatment combinations and four replicates for each treatment. The treatment combinations (2:1:1) included different substrate mixtures: T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM), T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM), T3 (Red Soil + Biochar + FYM), T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM) and T5 Control (Red Soil + Sand + FYM). Each substrate was thoroughly mixed before planting guava softwood cuttings to ensure homogeneity. The results of the experiment were statistically analyzed using the General R-Based Analysis Platform Empowered by Statistics (GRAPES), developed by the Department of Agricultural Statistics, Kerala Agricultural University, Kerala (www.kaugrapes.com). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the means, using a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. 

Among the treatments, T2 resulted in the highest plant height (36.34 cm), sturdy stem girth (4.74 mm), more number of leaves (4.66), maximum root volume (10.23 cm³), and longest root length (24.07 cm). Both dehydrogenase activity DHA (1.08 μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹) and microbial biomass carbon MBC (0.37 µg C g⁻¹) were also better in the media T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM).

The study demonstrated that biochar-enriched growing media, particularly the combination of cocopeat, biochar, and FYM, significantly improved root development, vegetative growth, and microbial activity in guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Lucknow-49 softwood cuttings. This T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM) media showed the highest rooting percentage with superior physiological performance, highlighting its potential for sustainable and efficient propagation of guava cuttings. These findings support the use of guava-derived biochar as a viable substrate amendment to enhance nursery production under tropical conditions.

Keywords

Guava, Biochar, Media, Morphological traits, Dehydrogenase activity and Microbiome.

Introduction

Guava (Psidium guajava L.), commonly known as the "Apple of the Tropics," is a highly valued tropical fruit cultivated widely in India. Guava, a crop belonging to the Myrtaceae family and native to tropical America, is rich in vitamin C and pectin, making it a nutritious and economically important fruit (Khairiyah et al., 2022; Guntarti et al., 2021). Among the several varieties grown in India, 'Lucknow-49' (L-49) is distinguished by its large fruit size, white pulp, few seeds and excellent flavour profile. This variety is appreciated for its extended post-harvest shelf life, regular market availability, and high yield potential, making it highly desirable for both fresh consumption and processing (Kumar and Sharma 2020; Kumar Sharma, 2019). As of 2024, guava cultivation in India spans approximately 3.59 lakh hectares, with an annual production of 5.59 million tonnes and a productivity range of 15-20 MT ha⁻¹ (APEDA, 2023). Additionally, India exported over 111.76,000 metric tonnes of guava in 2023-24 to countries such as Mexico, Saudi Arabia and Thailand (APEDA, 2024), underscoring its global commercial relevance.

Vegetative propagation is a crucial aspect of guava cultivation that maintains genetic uniformity and reduces the juvenile phase (Siddiqui et al., 2014). Air layering and stem cuttings, especially softwood to semi-hardwood cuttings, are widely practiced methods. Although air layering ensures high rooting success and genetic fidelity, it is limited by low propagation output (Pereira et al., 2017; Vilchez et al., 2011). Guava propagation through softwood cuttings under mist conditions supports large-scale multiplication and shorter establishment periods, although it requires precise environmental controls. The success of cutting propagation largely depends on the choice of rooting medium, which must balance aeration, moisture retention and nutrient availability. Substrates such as red soil, tank silt, sand, coco peat, biochar and farmyard manure (FYM) have shown significant potential for influencing root development and plant growth promotion (Patil et al., 2018; Bunt, 2019; Singh and Singh 2020; Yadav et al., 2017).

Furthermore, guava pruned residues, often considered agricultural waste, present an opportunity for sustainable waste management through biochar production. Biochar production through the pyrolysis of guava-pruned shoots in the absence of oxygen generates biochar, a stable, carbon-rich material known as 'black gold' that improves soil health by nutrient retention, adsorbing heavy metal toxins through its porous nature, enhancing water retention and stimulating microbial activity (Lehmann and Joseph 2015). Even though, growing interest in biochar applications, limited studies have explored its specific effects on root development during guava propagation. Existing research often focuses on mature plant growth, overlooking early-stage root architecture and establishment. The interaction between biochar and rhizosphere microbial communities in fruit crops like guava remains underexplored. Most findings are crop-specific, with few transferable insights into tropical fruit tree propagation. There is a need to understand how biochar amendments modulate soil biology and structure to enhance guava seedling vigour and rooting success. In this context, integrating guava propagation practices with biochar application offers a promising approach to sustainable horticulture and environmental stewardship (Steiner et al., 2007; Kammann et al., 2015).

Material & Methods

A. Experimental Site

The experiment was conducted at the nursery complex of SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India, which experiences a tropical and conducive climate for nursery level propagation. This study was conducted between January 2025 to July 2025. The location is positioned at a latitude of 12.70◦N and a longitude of 79.97◦E. The relative humidity in the area is 65 – 85 % and the average annual rainfall is 1200 mm. The temperatures in the region typically range from 27°C to 29°C.

B. Experimental Design 

The experimental design was a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) comprising five treatment combinations (2:1:1 ratio) - dry weight (w/w) replicated four times: T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM), T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM), T3 (Red Soil + Biochar + FYM), T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM) and T5 Control (Red Soil + Sand + FYM). Softwood cuttings of guava (Psidium guajava L. cv. Lucknow-49 was selected for uniformity and planted in pre-mixed potting mixture homogenized substrates. The observation recorded plant growth parameters were analyzed using these protocols.

Plant height (cm) was measured from the soil surface to the apical tip of the main shoot using a graduated ruler (Alam et al., 2019), and stem girth (mm) was recorded 2 cm above ground level using a digital vernier calliper (Khan et al., 2021). The number of fully expanded green leaves per cutting was counted weekly (Raza et al., 2018). For root assessment, secondary roots were manually counted after gentle washing, and root length (cm) was recorded using the thread-and-scale method (Ali et al., 2022). Root volume (ml) was estimated using water displacement in a graduated cylinder (Singh and Meena 2017). The soil biological properties were analyzed post-harvest.

Dehydrogenase activity (μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹), an indicator of microbial respiration, was quantified using the TTC (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride) reduction method (Casida et al., 1964). After 24-hour incubation at 37°C, the triphenyl formazan (TPF) formed was extracted with methanol and the absorbance was measured at 485 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC, µg C g⁻¹ soil) was estimated using the chloroform fumigation–extraction method (Anderson and Domsch 1978; Vance et al., 1987). Fumigated and non-fumigated soil samples (10–15 g) were extracted with 0.5 M K₂SO₄ and digested with 0.1 N K2Cr2O7 and concentrated H2SO4. Absorbance was measured at 600 nm, and MBC was calculated using the following equation: MBC = (C fumigated – C non-fumigated) / Kₑc, where Kₑc = 0.38.

Data were statistically analyzed using the General R-Based Analysis Platform Empowered by Statistics (GRAPES), developed by the Department of Agricultural Statistics, Kerala Agricultural University, Kerala (www.kaugrapes.com). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the means, using a significance level of P ≤ 0.05 (Gopinath et al., 2021). 

Results & Discussion

A. Plant Height (cm)

Significant differences in plant height were observed among the different treatments. The highest plants were recorded in T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM), with an average height of 36.34 cm, was recorded indicating superior vegetative growth. This was statistically on par with T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM), which recorded an average height of 34.03 cm. In contrast, the shortest plants were observed in the treatment T5 Control (Red Soil + Sand + FYM), with an average height of only 25.41 cm. These results suggest that the inclusion of cocopeat or tank silt along with biochar and FYM provided a better physical and nutrient environment for vertical-shoot growth development. This improvement may be due to enhanced moisture retention, aeration and nutrient availability in the media, which are known to promote shoot elongation in cuttings (Chandra et al., 2021). 

B. Stem Girth (mm)

The thickest stems were recorded in T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM) was (4.74 mm), which was statistically at par with T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM) (4.56 mm) and T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM) at 4.48 mm. The thinnest stem girth (3.84 mm) was noted in the T5 Control (Red soil + Sand+ FYM). The increased stem girth in T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM) may attribute to enhanced nutrient availability and better root-shoot coordination fostered by cocopeat and biochar-enhanced media (Fig. 1). Stem thickening is a physiological response linked to auxin transport and assimilate partitioning, which improves under improved rooting and nutrient conditions (Bhargava et al., 2020). The porous structure of biochar enhances microbial colonization and mineralization, facilitating better nutrient uptake and supporting stem thickness.

C. Number of Leaves (per cutting)

Number of new leaf production, an indicator of vegetative vigour, was highest in T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM), with an average of 4.66 new leaves per cutting. This was followed by T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM) (3.98) and T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM) (3.23), which performed significantly better than the control. The lowest number of new leaves was observed in T5 Control (Red soil + Sand + FYM) (2.15), indicating poor vegetative initiation in traditional media. Enhanced aeration and moisture retention in T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM) likely contributed to improved metabolic and photosynthetic activities. According to Bera et al. (2019), leaf emergence is highly influenced by substrate porosity and microbial interactions, both of which are enhanced by the inclusion of biochar and organic matter.

D. Number of Secondary Roots (per cutting)

The number of secondary roots, a crucial parameter for anchorage and nutrient absorption, was also significantly influenced by the growth media. T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM) recorded more number of roots (23.05), followed by T4 (Tank silt + Biochar + FYM) (21.76) and T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM) (20.97), indicating effective root proliferation in media containing biochar and organic amendments. T5 Control (Red soil + Sand + FYM) had a lesser root count (17.25), which may reflect suboptimal aeration and microbial support for root branching. Rhizospheric stimulation by Plant Growth – Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR), enhanced in biochar-rich substrates, promotes lateral root formation, which is consistent with prior reports on improved root traits under biochar application (El-Naggar et al., 2020).

E. Root Volume (cm³)

Root volume was greatest in T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM) (10.23 cm³), which was statistically on par with T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM) (9.85 cm³), and closely followed by T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM) (9.23 cm³). The lowest root volume was recorded in T5 Control (Red soil + Sand + FYM) (8.15 cm³). A higher root volume implies better water and nutrient absorption capacity, and the improvement observed in T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM) reflects the combined effect of cocopeat’s water retention and biochar’s porous structure, which enhances root development. Biochar promotes root architecture complexity by facilitating microbial symbiosis and buffering against environmental stresses, as noted by Bolan et al. (2024). 

F. Root Length (cm)

The lengthiest roots were observed in T2 (Red soil + Biochar + FYM) (24.07 cm), followed by T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM) (22.95 cm) and T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM) (21.57 cm). T5 Control (Red soil + Sand + FYM) treatment had the shortest roots at 19.26 cm (Table 1). These findings indicate that treatments containing biochar facilitated deeper root penetration, likely due to improved soil structure and aeration. The influence of biochar on root elongation is supported by its role in reducing soil compaction and promoting beneficial microbial activity, both of which are essential for healthy root growth (Schmidt et al., 2015).

G. Dehydrogenase Activity (μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹) 

Dehydrogenase activity, a key indicator of microbial respiration and overall soil biological health, was highest in T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM) (1.08 μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹) T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM) (0.96 μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹) and T1 (Sand + Biochar + FYM) (0.74 μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹) also showed considerable microbial activity compared to the T5 Control (Red soil +Sand + FYM), which had the lowest activity (0.48 μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹). The enhanced dehydrogenase activity in biochar-amended treatments suggests improved microbial colonization and organic matter utilization by the microbes. This agrees with the findings of Singha et al. (2022), who emphasized the sensitivity of dehydrogenase activity as a biological indicator of microbial metabolism under enhanced organic matter inputs.

H. Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC) (µg C g⁻¹) 

Microbial biomass carbon levels were significantly higher in T2 (Cocopeat + Biochar + FYM) (0.37 µg C g⁻¹), followed by T4 (Tank Silt + Biochar + FYM) (0.26 µg C g⁻¹), indicating greater microbial biomass and activity in these treatments than in the others. The lowest MBC was recorded in T5 Control (Red Soil + Sand +FYM) at 0.05 µg C g⁻¹. The elevated MBC values in biochar-enriched media underscore the role of biochar as a microbial habitat that supports higher microbial loads and better nutrient cycling. The high surface area and porosity of biochar facilitate microbial retention and activity, thereby enhancing microbe-mediated nutrient dynamics and root–microbe interactions (Debnath et al., 2021).

Table 1: Influence of Different Media for Plant Growth.

Treatments

Plant height (cm)

Stem girth (mm)

No. of new leaves

No. of secondary roots

Root volume (cm3)

Root length (cm)

Dehydrogenase activity
(μg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹)

Microbial biomass carbon (µg C g⁻¹)

T1 - Sand + biochar + FYM

31.19

4.48

3.23

20.97

9.23

21.57

0.74

0.19

T2 - Coco peat + biochar + FYM

36.34

4.74

4.66

23.05

10.23

24.07

1.08

0.37

T3 - Red soil + biochar + FYM

28.3

4.23

2.87

18.73

8.75

20.33

0.61

0.11

T4 - Tank silt + biochar + FYM

34.03

4.56

3.98

21.76

9.85

22.95

0.96

0.26

T5 - Control (Red soil + sand + FYM)

25.41

3.84

2.15

17.25

8.15

19.26

0.48

0.05

SE(d)

1.56

0.24

0.20

1.14

0.41

1.22

0.04

0.009

CD

3.49

0.53

0.45

2.55

0.93

3.86

0.10

0.019


Fig. 1. Influence of Different Media for Plant Growth.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that the composition of the growing media plays a critical role in the successful propagation of guava cv. Lucknow-49 through softwood cuttings. Among all treatments, the media comprising cocopeat, biochar and farmyard manure (T2) significantly enhanced shoot growth, root development and soil biological activities, including dehydrogenase activity and microbial biomass carbon. The superior performance observed in this treatment can be attributed to improved substrate aeration, moisture retention, nutrient availability and a favourable microbial environment created by the synergistic interaction of its components. These results underscore the potential of guava-based biochar as a sustainable, value-added input in nursery media, contributing not only to plant growth but also to soil health. These findings open new avenues for environmentally sound propagation practices and advocate the recycling of orchard biomass for biochar production. However, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of biochar-based substrates on field performance, nutrient dynamics, and microbial ecology under diverse agro-climatic conditions in the future. Additionally, assessing the scalability of such media for commercial nursery use and organic cultivation systems remains an applicable area of future research.

Future Scope

The promising results achieved through biochar-amended growing media for softwood cuttings of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Lucknow-49, several critical research gaps remain unaddressed. Notably, semi-hardwood and hardwood cuttings of guava are known to be more recalcitrant and physiologically less responsive to rooting compared to softwood cuttings. The limited rooting potential in these harder tissues is primarily attributed to their lower endogenous auxin levels, reduced meristematic activity and lignified vascular structure, which collectively hinder root initiation and emergence. Further investigation is needed to develop effective propagation techniques for these harder cutting types, possibly through advanced media formulations, optimized hormonal treatments, or microbial consortia that enhance rooting competency.

Future research should also focus on the interaction between biochar properties (e.g., feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature) and plant physiological responses to identify ideal combinations for different cutting types. Additionally, long-term studies under field conditions are essential to validate the transplant success, growth stability and soil health impacts of biochar-based propagation systems. Exploring the molecular and anatomical mechanisms governing adventitious root formation in difficult-to-root cuttings could open new avenues for genetic and agronomic interventions. These efforts will be crucial in broadening the applicability of sustainable nursery technologies for commercial guava propagation and other woody fruit crops.


References

Ali, H., Javed, M. S., Latif, M. A., Qureshi, A. A. and Ali, A. (2022). Comparative response of different substrates on vegetative propagation of guava. International Journal of Fruit Science, 22(1), 105–115.

Alam, M. A., Alam, M. J. and Rahman, M. M. (2019). Effects of rooting media on propagation of guava cuttings. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(2), 85–92.

Anderson, J. P. E. and Domsch, K. H. (1978). A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 10(3), 215–221.

APEDA (2023). Export of horticulture products from India 2023. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority, Ministry of Commerce, Govt. of India. https://apeda.gov.in

APEDA (2024). Export statistics for guava (2023–24). Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority, Govt. of India. https://apeda.gov.in

Bera, T., Roy, P. K. and Biswas, B. (2019). Effect of media and IBA on rooting of semi-hardwood cuttings in guava (Psidium guajava L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(5), 1682–1690.

Bhargava, M., Sharma, A. and Kaur, M. (2020). Influence of organic media on the rooting of guava cuttings under mist house conditions. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(1), 869–872.

Bolan, S., Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, M., Rao, C. S., Nataraj, K. C. and Bolan, N. (2024). Biochar modulating soil biological health: A review. Science of the Total Environment914, 169585.

Bunt, A. C. (2019). Media and mixes for container-grown plants. 2nd ed., Unwin Hyman Ltd., London.

Casida, L. E., Klein, D. A. and Santoro, T. (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science, 98(6), 371–376.

Chandra, R., Jadhav, P. and Singh, A. (2021). Influence of rooting media on growth and survival of guava cuttings. Journal of Plant Development Sciences, 13(9), 679–683.

Debnath, S., Das, T., Dey, P. and Ray, D. P. (2021). Biochar-enhanced microbial biomass and enzymatic activities in fruit crop nurseries. Journal of Environmental Biology, 42(3), 529–534.

El-Naggar, A., Shaheen, S. M., Sarkar, B., Chang, S. X., Tsang, D. C. and Rinklebe, J. (2020). Biochar application to low fertility soils: A review of current status and future prospects. Geoderma, 361, 114096.

Gopinath, P. P., Parsad, R., Joseph, B. and VS, A. (2021). grapesAgri1: collection of shiny apps for data analysis in agriculture. Journal of Open Source Software6(63), 3437.

Guntarti, A. W., Nugroho, R. A. and Hidayat, M. (2021). Utilization of guava in functional food development: A review. Indonesian Journal of Food Science and Technology, 4(2), 87–94.

Kammann, C. I., Ratering, S., Eckhard, C. and Müller, C. (2015). Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas emissions and soil microbial community structure. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(1), 701–710.

Khairiyah, K., Mursid, S. P. and Lestari, R. A. (2022). Nutritional and functional potential of guava. International Journal of Food Sciences, 11(1), 44–50.

Khan, M. A., Akram, M. and Hussain, S. (2021). Effect of different growing media on rooting and growth of guava cuttings. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 37(2), 499–504.

Kumar, A. and Sharma, M. (2019). Performance of guava varieties under subtropical conditions of Punjab. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 48(1), 61–64.

Kumar, M. and Sharma, M. (2020). Post-harvest and shelf-life studies of guava cultivars. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 77(1), 74–79.

Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2015). Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation. 2nd ed., Routledge.

Patil, S. D., Ingle, S. T. and Pawar, B. B. (2018). Effect of growing media on rooting of guava cuttings. Plant Archives, 18(1), 475–478.

Pereira, M. C., Andrade, M. L. and Lima, G. S. (2017). Guava propagation methods: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(21), 1834–1840.

Raza, M. A., Hussain, I. and Zafar, Z. U. (2018). Influence of substrates on rooting and vegetative characteristics of guava cuttings. Pure and Applied Biology, 7(3), 958–964.

Siddiqui, M. W., Dey, P. and Singh, S. (2014). Influence of organic substrates and biostimulants on rooting of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cuttings. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 6(2), 291–296.

Schmidt, H. P., Pandit, B. H., Martinsen, V., Cornelissen, G., Conte, P. and Kammann, C. (2015). Fourfold increase in pumpkin yield in response to low-dosage root zone application of urine-enhanced biochar to a fertile tropical soil. Agriculture, 5(3), 723–741.

Singha, R., Lal, R., Sinha, A. and Bora, A. (2022). Enhancement of soil microbial health and root development using guava-derived biochar. Journal of Environmental Management, 310, 114676.

Singh, A. and Meena, R. K. (2017). Evaluation of rooting ability and media for guava softwood cuttings. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(18), 4313–4316.

Singh, B. and Singh, R. (2020). Effect of rooting media on the success of guava stem cuttings. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(2), 1112–1114.

Steiner, C., Das, K. C., Melear, N. and Lakly, D. (2007). Reducing nitrogen loss during poultry litter composting using biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(4), 1236–1242.

Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C. and Jenkinson, D. S. (1987). An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 19(6), 703–707.

Vilchez, J. L., García, J. A. and Cuenca, J. (2011). Effect of auxins and substrates on rooting of guava cuttings. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(3), 898–905.

Yadav, P. K., Kumar, M. and Singh, A. K. (2017). Performance of different growing media on vegetative propagation of guava. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(9), 2581–2587.

How to cite this article

Nithiyasri S., Akino A., Gopu B. and Anbukkarasi Kaliyaperumal (2025). Influence of Biochar Amended Media on Root Development and Microbial Dynamics in Guava Propagation. Biological Forum, 17(8): 80-85.