Level of Adoption of Flood Disaster Mitigation Strategies by Livestock Farmers during Flood Disaster in Cuddalore District of Tamil Nadu
Author: P. Silambarasan1*, Thanga Thamil Vanan2, N. Kumaravel3
, R. Richard Churchil4, N. Vengadabady5 and N. Vimal Rajkumar6
Journal Name:
Download PDF
Abstract
The frequent occurrence of flood disaster causes damages to human as well animal life
leading to heavy economic loss, which forced the Government organizations to formulate suitable
mitigation measures. In spite of its recommendations, loss to life of animals and economy continues to
occur every year due to poor implementation of mitigation measures. The present study was conducted
with the objective of assessing the level of adoption of flood mitigation strategies of livestock farmers
during flood disaster. For this study, the data on long-term and short-term mitigation strategies adopted
by livestock farmers was collected from 600 livestock farmers residing in different flood prone zones of
Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu, by using an interview schedule. The survey revealed that only small
number of farmers in the study area adopted the short-term general management practices like moving
animals to raised platform (15.16%), moving animals to community shelter (13.50%), moving animals
inside residential house (20.30%) and moving animals to friend’s/relatives’ safe shelter (5.00%). The short-
term feeding management practices like keeping feed and fodder in safe area such as under the roof,
receiving feed and fodder as relief material from Government bodies/NGOs/Volunteers, borrowing feed
and fodder from friends/relatives and bulk purchase of feed and sharing were adopted by only less number
of respondents (9.20, 17.00, 4.66 and 3.16% respectively). Majority of the farmers in the study area
adopted long-term general management practices like getting coverage of animals under insurance
schemes (56.30%) and rearing indigenous breeds (53.50%). Although many farmers adopted the long-term
general management practices like keeping dry fodder in preserved haylage (65.66%) and feeding un
conventional feeds to animals (89.17%), other practices like constructing feed and fodder storage (17.80%),
keeping green fodder in preserved silage form (8.34%) and growing flood-tolerant fodder varieties
(12.64%) were poorly adopted by them. In conclusion, scientific interventions like capacity building
programmes for farmers to improve the adoption rates and construction of multipurpose evacuation
shelters in elevated areas are required as mitigation strategies.
Keywords
Management of livestock, Disaster, Feeding Management, Flood.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it was found that, the farmers need to be
enlightened on the flood disaster mitigation strategies,
in terms of construction of shed in elevated place,
mobilization of animals to elevated and safe place and
proper storage of feed and fodder. Many scientific
Silambarasan et al., Biological Forum – An International Journal 14(2a): 420-424(2022) 424
mitigation practices are not fully adopted by the farmers
of the study area, indicating the need for capacity
building of farmers to face the disasters logically with
scientific methods. It was also found that, the available
multipurpose evacuation shelters are located in lowlying area making unfit to use for animal mobilization
and hence suitable sites need to be identified in
elevated locations and steps may be initiated to
construct community animal shelter with the assistance
of District disaster management.
References
In conclusion, it was found that, the farmers need to be
enlightened on the flood disaster mitigation strategies,
in terms of construction of shed in elevated place,
mobilization of animals to elevated and safe place and
proper storage of feed and fodder. Many scientific
Silambarasan et al., Biological Forum – An International Journal 14(2a): 420-424(2022) 424
mitigation practices are not fully adopted by the farmers
of the study area, indicating the need for capacity
building of farmers to face the disasters logically with
scientific methods. It was also found that, the available
multipurpose evacuation shelters are located in lowlying area making unfit to use for animal mobilization
and hence suitable sites need to be identified in
elevated locations and steps may be initiated to
construct community animal shelter with the assistance
of District disaster management.
How to cite this article
: P. Silambarasan, Thanga.Thamil Vanan, N. Kumaravel, R. Richard Churchil, N. Vengadabady and N.
Vimal Rajkumar (2022). Level of Adoption of Flood Disaster Mitigation Strategies by Livestock Farmers during Flood Disaster
in Cuddalore District of Tamil Nadu. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(2a): 420-424.