Author:
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(12): 182-188, 2024
Address:
1Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Food Technology, William Carey University, Shilong (Meghalaya), India.
2Professor, Department of Food Technology, William Carey University, Shilong (Meghalaya), India.
3Associate Professor, Department of Forestry and Environmental Science School of Earth and Environmental Science, Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital (Uttarakhand), India.
4Principal Scientist, Environmental Science,
ICAR- National Research Centre for Orchids, Dikiling Road, Pakyong (Sikkim), India.
5Research Scholar, Centre of Food Technology,
University of Allahabad, Prayagraj (Uttar Pradesh), India.
(Corresponding author: Prity Pant* )
DOI: -
Panko Bread, Hygiene, Sensory Attributes, Pesticides, Chemical Parameters.
Bread is a staple food for many people worldwide, with an average annual consumption of 59 to 70 kilogrammes per person. This is because of its high calorie content, relative affordability, and diversity in preparation. The main ingredients are flour, water, yeast, and salt, yet numerous pastries have been created based on the ingredients and baking techniques utilised in each area or culture. According to Salinas and Pippo (2018) bread is a solid, heterogeneous, and unstable foam made up of crust and crumbs, with starch granules as its primary constituents arranged in a continuous proteic matrix. These macromolecules include amylose and amylopectin. While amylopectin is a branching polymer with α-1,6 links, amylose is a linear polymer made up of glucose monomers connected by α-1,4 glycosidic linkages (Korompokis et al., 2021). Cereals have amylose concentrations between 18 and 33% and amylopectin values between 70 and 80% (Lal et al., 2021). Bread is a widely consumed staple food with significant nutritional value (Dahiya et al., 2019). Recent research has focused on improving bread quality and reducing waste. Wasted bread can be repurposed into flour, with crust and crumb flours exhibiting different properties that could be utilised in various food products (Fernández-Peláez et al., 2021). When preparing bread, the kind of flour and leavening agent used are crucial in determining the final product's quality. Compared to refined flour, whole grain flour exhibits superior overall nutritional quality because of its high fibre content, minerals, and bioactive substances (Venturi et al., 2021). Wheat flour produces a dough with the required rheological qualities when combined with yeast (Scheuer et al., 2014), making it the most popular grain for breadmaking (Calvo Carrillo et al., 2020; Rai et al., 2012). Additionally, due to its vital nutrients, wheat is consumed by about 40% of the world's population (Giraldo et al., 2019). Because of its capacity to adapt to a wide range of climatic conditions, this grain accounts for 27% of the world's cereal production (Heshe et al., 2016).
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is such a significant cereal in Europe that it is the primary producer, with 123 million tonnes produced per year, followed by China (96 million tonnes) and India (72 million tonnes). Bread, cakes, spaghetti, and biscuits are all made from wheat flour (Sakandar et al., 2019). With almost nine billion kilograms consumed annually, bread is a mainstay of the world's diet (Li et al., 2021). The average annual intake in affluent nations is 70 kg per person (De Boni et al., 2019). Ensuring food safety and quality is a top priority across the global agri-food sector, from farm production to food enterprises. In the panko bread industry, strict adherence to food safety standards is crucial to prevent contamination and maintain product excellence (Sahani et al., 2024). Wheat's high production makes it an inexpensive cereal, further contributing to its widespread global consumption (Sakandar et al., 2019).
This research was conducted in a workstation laboratory located at Ludhiana, Punjab, India. The formulation for the product included a variety of ingredients aimed at enhancing texture, flavour, and nutritional quality. The primary components were wheat flour, water, and sugar, providing the base and essential carbohydrate source. Gluten was added to improve dough elasticity, while yeast facilitated leavening through fermentation (Cukier de Aquino et al., 2012). Additional ingredients like lactic acid and malt extract were incorporated for flavour enhancement and preservation. The formulation included iodised salt, rice bran oil, and edible vegetable fat to enhance taste, mouthfeel, and nutritional value. Soya flour, wheat bran, garlic powder, and tuity fruity were used to add fibre, flavour, and distinct sensory qualities. Multigrains were integrated to enhance the product's nutrient profile. Class II preservatives, such as calcium propionate and sorbic acid, were utilised to extend shelf life (Saini et al., 2021), while permitted emulsifiers (E481i) and acidity regulators (E260) were added for product stability and flavour consistency. Antioxidants, including ascorbic acid and E300, were also incorporated to maintain product freshness. Fumaric acid was added to adjust pH and improve texture.
The process begins with the receipt of incoming raw materials, primarily wheat flour, which is subjected to quality control (QC) sampling and testing to verify compliance with set standards. If the material passes the QC check, it is cleared for the next step; if not, it is labelled as “rejected” and returned to the supplier. Once approved, the raw material is stored until needed for further processing. At this stage, the stored flour is shifted to a designated sieving room, where it undergoes sieving to remove impurities and ensure a refined product. During this process, any waste and foreign materials, such as threads, maida lumps, insects, paper, and other contaminants, are separated out and disposed of. The sieved refined wheat flour is then poured into a bowl, measured according to the specific batch size required for production. This measured flour is combined with minor and major ingredients per the recipe, and treated UV-filtered water is added to aid in the dough-making process, ensuring both the texture and quality of the dough meet required standards. Finally, the prepared dough moves to a divider, which portions the dough based on specified weight requirements. This prepares the dough for the next stages in production, which may include shaping, baking, or packaging. The entire flow ensures quality control, efficient waste management, and consistent batch preparation, vital for maintaining product quality and safety throughout the production line.
The bread manufacturing process involves several critical stages, each essential to ensure a high-quality final product.
Formulation: The first stage involves precise measurement and mixing of ingredients, including flour, water, yeast, salt, and any additional ingredients (e.g., sugar, fats, or improvers) as per the desired bread formulation. The accuracy of formulation is crucial to achieving consistent dough quality.
Mixing: In this step, ingredients are combined in a mixer to develop the dough. Mixing helps hydrate the flour and develop gluten, a protein that gives bread its structure. The dough must be kneaded to the correct consistency, ensuring a smooth texture and the right level of elasticity.
Fig. 1. Panko White Crumbs.
Moulding: The mixed dough is then divided into portions and shaped or moulded into the desired form. This can include shaping the dough into loaves, rolls, or other shapes, depending on the type of bread being produced. Moulding plays a crucial role in bread making, influencing aeration and rheology throughout the process (Campbell and Martin 2020). The use of baking moulds has ancient origins, with evidence from archaeological contexts in the Near East revealing early bread-making techniques and tools (Balossi and Mori 2014).
Proofing (Fermentation): The shaped dough portions are then placed in a controlled environment, usually a proofing chamber with specific temperature and humidity levels, to allow fermentation. During proofing, the yeast ferments the sugars in the dough, producing carbon dioxide gas, which causes the dough to rise and develop flavour. Carbon dioxide production during proofing has been correlated with fermentation parameters and final bread quality (Istudor et al., 2020).
Fig. 2. Panko Loaf.
Baking: The proofed dough is placed in an oven, where it undergoes a baking process at a set temperature and duration. Baking causes the dough to expand further, and the heat kills the yeast, solidifies the dough structure, and gives the bread its characteristic texture and crust. The baking stage is critical for setting the final bread structure, but it can also affect the stability of certain compounds. For instance, ochratoxin A, a mycotoxin that can contaminate wheat flour, shows high stability during fermentation but lower stability during baking (Milani and Heidari 2017).
Depanning: After baking, the bread is removed from the pans or moulds (if used). This step must be done carefully to avoid damaging the bread’s shape or texture.
Cooling: The freshly baked bread is transferred to cooling racks to allow it to cool to room temperature. Proper cooling is essential, as it allows moisture and gases within the bread to escape, which prevents sogginess and ensures a better texture. Cooling is a critical process in bread making that affects product quality and shelf life (Kinner et al., 2021).
Slicing: For sliced bread, the cooled loaves are fed through an automatic slicer, which cuts them into uniform slices according to the desired thickness. This step is typically skipped if the product is unsliced or in a whole loaf format. Traditional methods using standard knives are less effective for small to medium-scale bakers. Automated cutting machines can improve efficiency, with one design capable of slicing a loaf in 38 seconds (Rahmawati et al., 2023). The slicing process affects bread quality and consumer preference, with factors like moisture content and cell structure influencing sensory characteristics (Marinopoulou et al., 2020).
Packaging: The bread is then packaged in suitable packaging material to maintain freshness, protect it from external contaminants, and extend its shelf life. Packaging is often done in plastic bags, but other options, such as paper wraps, may be used for speciality or artisan breads. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) and active packaging (AP) have gained attention for their ability to prolong shelf life and prevent fungal growth naturally (Subramaniyan et al., 2022).
Metal Detection: To ensure food safety, the packaged bread is passed through a metal detector to check for any metal contaminants that may have entered the product during the manufacturing process. This step is crucial to comply with food safety standards. Recent studies have investigated heavy metal contamination in bread across different countries. While some essential trace metals like Cu, Zn, and Mn were found at safe levels in Nigerian bread (Akpambang and Onifade 2020), other research revealed concerning levels of certain metals. In Iran, Al, Fe, and Na exceeded permissible limits in traditional flatbreads, with children facing higher non-carcinogenic risks (Khodaei et al., 2023).
Stacking: The packaged bread is then organized and stacked appropriately to prepare for storage or transportation. Stacking ensures that the packages are handled efficiently and prevents damage during handling.
Storage and Shipping: Finally, the packaged and stacked bread is stored in a controlled environment until it is ready for distribution. It is then shipped to retail outlets, ensuring that it reaches consumers while still fresh. Proper bread type selection and good sanitary practices are simple ways to prolong bread storage (Alpers et al., 2021).
Fig. 3. Bread Production Line.
Fig. 4. Bread Crumbs Production Line.
Storage and Handling Guidelines. Before dispatch, the product should be stored in a cool, dry, and hygienic environment, away from direct sunlight. After dispatch, it is important to maintain similar conditions: keep the product cool, dry, and hygienic, also avoiding exposure to direct sunlight. Ensure that the storage area is free from odours to preserve product quality.
Organoleptic Characteristics (Sensory Properties). The product was shaped like a rectangle, featuring a golden-brown crust and a white or brown crumb. It was soft and had fine grains. It possessed a typical baked goods flavour, free from any off-taste or off-odour.
Chemical Characteristics (External Testing). The moisture content and crude fiber were determined by using AOAC method (Gopalan et al., 2009) mineral analysis by ICP-OES and pH was determined by pH meter. Alcoholic acidity and acid insoluble ash were also determined. Water activity (aw) is an important factor in evaluating the quality and safety of a product. It measures the availability of free water within a system, which can influence microbial growth, chemical reactions, and physical properties. In this study, a standard water activity meter (Aqua Lab water activity meter) was employed to assess the water activity of the extrudates developed.
Microbiological Characteristics (External Testing). All bread samples were tested to determine the total bacterial count, coliform count, yeast & mold count, salmonella, E. coli and S. aureus were carried out on the bread samples to determine the microbial load of the samples (Harrigan, 1998).
Pesticides Residue. All bread samples underwent testing for pesticide residues utilizing liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. This method ensures accurate detection and quantification of any harmful substances present in the samples.
Physical Parameters. The product was thoroughly evaluated for physical impurities and foreign matter, and the results showed that no dirt was detected, indicating complete absence. Additionally, a careful inspection revealed that neither insects nor any insect fragments were present. The assessment also confirmed that no larvae were found, as they were entirely absent. Furthermore, a detailed examination showed that there were no traces of rodent hair within the product. It was noted that there were no added colouring substances, as these were completely absent. Finally, the analysis indicated that harmful or injurious foreign matter was not detected, demonstrating that the product is free from any physical contaminants. Overall, these results ensure that the product adheres to stringent hygiene and safety standards.
Table 1: Physical And Chemical Parameters of Panko Bread.
Sr. No. | Parameter(s) | Unit(s) | Result(s) |
1. | Dirt | — | Absent |
2. | Insect & Insect Fragments | — | Absent |
3. | Larvae | — | Absent |
4. | Rodent Hair | — | Absent |
5. | Added Colouring Matter | — | Absent |
6. | Harmful/Injurious Foreign Matter | — | Absent |
Chemical Parameters. The chemical parameters of the product indicate a moisture content of 7.50%, which points to the amount of water present, and a salt concentration of 0.90% (as NaCl), reflecting the salt levels, and together these values suggest the product's overall chemical quality in relation to its moisture and salt content. Proximate analysis of bread samples reveals protein content between 9.13-9.79%, fat 1.64-4.50%, and moisture 27.22-29.05% (Adeoye et al., 2021). Salt plays important roles in bread-making, including improving dough quality, flavor, and shelf life (Nahar et al., 2019), excessive intake is linked to hypertension and other health issues (Jafari et al., 2016).
S. No. | Parameter(s) | Unit(s) | Result(s) |
1 | Moisture | % | 7.50 |
2 | Salt | % | 0.90 |
3 | Fibre | % | 3.7 |
Heavy Metals. The examination of heavy metals indicates that the levels of mercury, lead, copper, arsenic, and tin are all below the detection thresholds, specifically less than 0.1 mg/kg for mercury, lead, and arsenic, less than 1.0 mg/kg for copper, and less than 5 mg/kg for tin, confirming the product's safety for consumption. Studies found metal concentrations below permissible limits set by FAO/WHO (Rasheed, 2022), others reported levels exceeding these limits, particularly for aluminum, iron, and sodium (Khodaei et al., 2023). The highest concentrations of heavy metals were typically found in bran bread samples (Abou-raya et al., 2007).
Table 2: Heavy Metals in Panko Bread.
Sr. No. | Parameter(s) | Unit(s) | Result(s) |
1. | Mercury (as Hg) | mg/kg | < 0.1 |
2. | Lead (as Pb) | mg/kg | < 0.1 |
3. | Copper (as Cu) | mg/kg | < 1.0 |
4. | Arsenic (as As) | mg/kg | < 0.1 |
5. | Tin (as Sn) | mg/kg | < 5.0 |
6. | Cadmium (as Cd) | mg/kg | < 0.1 |
7. | Methyl Mercury | mg/kg | < 0.01 |
Microbial Analysis. The microbiological analysis of the product indicates robust safety and quality, as evidenced by the Total Plate Count of 3.6 × 10³ cfu/g, which falls within safe limits and suggests good hygiene during processing and storage; the absence of E. coli confirms no faecal contamination, while the very low level of Total Coliforms (<10 cfu/g) further supports hygiene standards; notably, Staphylococcus aureus and Shigella were both absent, indicating no risk of food poisoning from these pathogens; similarly, the absence of Salmonella ensures the product is free from one of the most common foodborne illness causes; the Yeast and Mould count of 78 cfu/g, though present, remains low and does not significantly compromise food quality or safety; additionally, the absence of Clostridium perfringens confirms no risk of food poisoning, and the non-detection of Listeria monocytogenes signifies a critical safeguard against listeriosis, particularly for vulnerable populations; collectively, these findings affirm the microbiological integrity of the product, rendering it safe for consumption. Post-baking contamination significantly affects bread's microbial quality (György and Laslo 2024). Total viable bacterial counts in commercial breads range from 10 to 395 CFU/g, with variations between crust and crumb (György and Laslo 2024).
Table 3: Microbial Analysis in Panko Bread.
Sr. No. | Parameter(s) | Unit(s) | Result(s) |
1. | Total Plate Count | cfu/g | 3.6 × 10³ |
2. | E. Coli | per g | Absent |
3. | Total Coliforms | cfu/g | < 10 |
4. | S. Aureus | per 25g | Absent |
5. | Shigella | per 25g | Absent |
6. | Salmonella | per 25g | Absent |
7. | Yeast & Mold | cfu/g | 78 |
8. | Clostridium Perfringens | per 25g | Absent |
9. | Listeria Monocytogenes | per 25g | Absent |
Pesticides Residue. In the study most pesticides were detected at levels below their quantification limits (<0.001 to <0.005 mg/kg). These include commonly used pesticides such as Cypermethrin, Chlorpyrifos, and Pyrethrins. Pesticides like Tridemorph, Heptachlor, and Carbaryl were detected at levels as low as <0.0001 mg/kg, indicating stringent adherence to safety standards. Compounds like Hydrogen cyanide and Phosphide show detectable levels below 0.01 mg/kg, suggesting minimal risk from post-harvest treatments. Residues such as 2,4-D and Pendimethalin remain under the permissible detection limit (<0.002 to <0.005 mg/kg). Major agricultural chemicals, including Carbendazim, Triadimefon, and Propiconazole, are within acceptable residual limits. The results demonstrate significant compliance with food safety standards such as Codex Alimentarius and FSSAI, ensuring consumer safety from pesticide residues. Residues of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane and chlorpyrifos are reported globally, while illegal and counterfeit pesticides further compromise food safety (Zikankuba et al., 2019).
Table 4: Pesticides Residue in Panko Bread.
Sr. No. | Parameter | Unit | Result |
1. | Cypermethrin | mg/kg | < 0.0001 |
2. | Methyl chloro-phenoxy-acetic acid | mg/kg | < 0.0001 |
3. | Tridemorph | mg/kg | < 0.0001 |
4. | Propiconazole | mg/kg | < 0.0002 |
5. | Sullfosulfuron | mg/kg | < 0.0001 |
6. | Trifluralin | mg/kg | < 0.001 |
7. | Chlorimuron-ethyl | mg/kg | < 0.0005 |
8. | Dichlofop-methyl | mg/kg | < 0.0001 |
9. | Pendimethalin | mg/kg | < 0.0005 |
10. | Metasulfuron-ethyl | mg/kg | < 0.001 |
11. | Methabenzthiazuron | mg/kg | < 0.0001 |
12. | Triallate | mg/kg | < 0.0002 |
13. | Fenox-prop-p-ethyl | mg/kg | <0.001 |
14. | Triadimefon | mg/kg | <0.002 |
15. | Isoproturon | mg/kg | <0.002 |
16. | Tebuconazole | mg/kg | <0.003 |
17. | Aldrin | mg/kg | < 0.0001 |
18. | Dieldrin | mg/kg | <0.0001 |
19. | Carbaryl | mg/kg | <0.0001 |
20. | Chlordane | mg/kg | <0.0003 |
21. | Diazinon | mg/kg | <0.0002 |
22. | dichlorvos | mg/kg | <0.01 |
23. | Fenitrthion | mg/kg | <0.0001 |
24. | Heptachlor | mg/kg | <0.0001 |
25. | Hydrogen cyanide | mg/kg | < 0.01 |
26. | Hydrogen phosphide | mg/kg | <0.001 |
27. | Inorganic bromide | mg/kg | <0.02 |
28. | Gamma – isomer (Lindane) | mg/kg | <0.001 |
29. | Matathion | mg/kg | <0.001 |
30. | Phosphamidon residues | mg/kg | < 0.003 |
31. | Pyrethrins | mg/kg | <0.0003 |
32. | Chlrienvinphos | mg/kg | <0.0001 |
33. | Chlorpyrifos | mg/kg | <0.004 |
34. | 2,4 D | mg/kg | <0.0002 |
35. | Ethion | mg/kg | <0.0001 |
36. | Monocrotophos | mg/kg | <0.0003 |
37. | Paraquat dichloride | mg/kg | <0.001 |
38. | Trichlorfon | mg/kg | <0.0001 |
39. | Thiometon | mg/kg | <0.0003 |
40. | Carbendazin | mg/kg | <0.001 |
41. | Bejomyl | mg/kg | <0.002 |
42. | Carbofuran | mg/kg | <0.001 |
43. | Decamethrin / Deltamethrin | mg/kg | <0.003 |
44. | Fenthion | mg/kg | <0.004 |
45. | Dithiocarbamates | mg/kg | <0.0001 |
46. | Phenthoate | mg/kg | <0.005 |
47. | Phorate | mg/kg | <0.003 |
48. | Pirimiphos-methyl | mg/kg | <0.002 |
49. | Bitertanol | mg/kg | <0.001 |
50. | Oxydemeton methyl | mg/kg | <0.001 |
51. | Chlodinafop propanyl | mg/kg | <0.003 |
The research on Panko bread production highlights the critical importance of maintaining hygiene standards and effective production practices. The findings confirm that the bread was free from harmful contaminants, including dirt and insects, ensuring compliance with stringent hygiene standards. Additionally, there were no biological contaminants such as larvae or rodent hair, indicating successful measures to prevent contamination.
The careful selection of ingredients, including refined wheat flour, water, sugar, gluten, and yeast, enhances the bread's texture, flavor, and nutritional quality, contributing to overall product safety. The study also measured moisture content and water activity, which are vital in assessing quality and potential microbial growth.
Sensory evaluations revealed that the Panko bread had a desirable soft texture and typical baked flavor without off-tastes or odors, appealing to consumers. Furthermore, the production process emphasized quality control and efficient waste management, crucial for maintaining product safety throughout.
In summary, the research underscores the significance of stringent hygiene practices, thoughtful ingredient selection, and efficient production processes in ensuring the safety and quality of Panko bread, serving as a valuable guideline for other food production processes aiming to uphold high hygiene standards.
The future scope of research in Panko bread production hygiene standards encompasses a multifaceted approach aimed at enhancing product safety and quality. Key areas for exploration include the development of advanced automated cleaning protocols to minimize human error, implementation of long-term monitoring systems for contaminant detection, and innovation in ingredient selection to improve nutritional profiles and sensory qualities. Additionally, consumer acceptance studies will be vital for aligning products with market preferences, while sustainable practices in production and packaging can help address environmental concerns. Investigating technological advancements, such as IoT devices for real-time monitoring, alongside improvements in fermentation techniques and cross-contamination prevention measures, can further bolster hygiene standards. By focusing on these areas, future research will ensure that Panko bread production not only meets regulatory requirements but also adapts to evolving consumer demands and global market trends.
Abou-Raya, M. A., Shalaby, M. T., Kassem, A. M., El-Dahshan, A. D. and Ibrahim, F. Y. (2007). Heavy metals contens in different types of bread samples and its raw materials. Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 32(7), 5405-5512.
Alpers, T., Kerpes, R., Frioli, M., Nobis, A., Hoi, K. I., Bach, A. and Becker, T. (2021). Impact of storing condition on staling and microbial spoilage behavior of bread and their contribution to prevent food waste. Foods, 10(1), 76.
Adeoye, A. O., Ajala, A. S. and Oladipo, I. C. (2021). Microbial assessment and proximate composition of bread samples collected from different bakeries in Ogbomoso, Oyo state, Nigeria. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 13(1), 10873-10873.
Akpambang, V. O. E. and Onifade, A. P. (2020). Trace metals contamination in bread ingredients and bread from bakeries in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Applied Chemistry Research, 5(2), 26-37.
Balossi Restelli, F. and Mori, L. (2014). Bread, baking moulds and related cooking techniques in the Ancient Near East. Food and History, 12(3), 39-55.
Cukier de Aquino, V., Converti, A., Perego, P., & Caetano da Silva Lannes, S. (2012). Leavening bread dough. Current Nutrition & Food Science, 8(2), 131-138.
Campbell, G. M. and Martin, P. J. (2020). Bread aeration and dough rheology: An introduction. In Breadmaking (pp. 325-371). Woodhead Publishing.
Calvo-Carrillo, M. D. L. C., López-Méndez, O. X., Carranco-Jáuregui, M. E. and Marines, J. (2020). Physicochemical and sensory evaluation of a baguette bread using wheat (Triticum spp) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) flours. Biotecnia, 22(3), 116-124.
De Boni, A., Pasqualone, A., Roma, R. and Acciani, C. (2019). Traditions, health and environment as bread purchase drivers: A choice experiment on high-quality artisanal Italian bread. Journal of cleaner production, 221, 249-260.
Dahiya, A., Sharma, R., Sindhu, S. and Sindhu, S. S. (2019). Resource partitioning in the rhizosphere by inoculated Bacillus spp. towards growth stimulation of wheat and suppression of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) weed. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 25(6), 1483-1495.
Fernández-Peláez, J., Guerra, P., Gallego, C. and Gomez, M. (2021). Physical properties of flours obtained from wasted bread crusts and crumbs. Foods, 10(2), 282.
György, É. and Laslo, É. (2024). Microbiological Quality Assessment of Some Commercially Available Breads. Foods, 13(20), 3271.
Gopalan, C., Ramasastri, S. C. and Balasubramanian (2009). Nutritive value of Indian foods. National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad. 47-48.
Giraldo, P., Benavente, E., Manzano-Agugliaro, F. and Gimenez, E. (2019). Worldwide research trends on wheat and barley: A bibliometric comparative analysis. Agronomy, 9(7), 352.
Harrigan, W. F. (1998). Laboratory methods in food microbiology (Vol. 308). Academic Press.
Heshe, G. G., Haki, G. D., Woldegiorgis, A. Z. and Gemede, H. F. (2016). Effect of conventional milling on the nutritional value and antioxidant capacity of wheat types common in Ethiopia and a recovery attempt with bran supplementation in bread. Food Science & Nutrition, 4(4), 534-543.
Istudor, A., Voicu, G., Muscalu, G. and Tudor, P. (2020). Evaluation of carbon dioxide released by bread dough during proving stage. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 180, p. 03012). EDP Sciences.
Jafari, M., Mohammadi, M., Ghazizadeh, H. and Nakhaee, N. (2016). Feasibility and outcome of reducing salt in bread: a community trial in Southern Iran. Global Journal of Health Science, 8(12), 163.
Korompokis, K., Deleu, L. J., De Brier, N. and Delcour, J. A. (2021). Investigation of starch functionality and digestibility in white wheat bread produced from a recipe containing added maltogenic amylase or amylomaltase. Food Chemistry, 362, 130203.
Kinner, M., Rüegg, R., Weber, C. A., Buchli, J., Durrer, L. and Müller, N. (2021). Impact of selected baking and vacuum cooling parameters on the quality of toast bread. Journal of food science and technology, 1-9.
Khodaei, S. M., Esfandiari, Z., Sami, M. and Ahmadi, A. (2023). Determination of metal (oids) in different traditional flat breads distributed in Isfahan city, Iran: health risk assessment study by Latin hypercube sampling. Toxicology Reports, 10, 382-388.
Lal, M. K., Singh, B., Sharma, S., Singh, M. P. and Kumar, A. (2021). Glycemic index of starchy crops and factors affecting its digestibility: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 111, 741-755.
Li, Y. L., Han, K. N., Feng, G. X., Wan, Z. L., Wang, G. S. and Yang, X. Q. (2021). Salt reduction in bread via enrichment of dietary fiber containing sodium and calcium. Food & function, 12(6), 2660-2671.
Milani, J. and Heidari, S. (2017). Stability of ochratoxin A during bread making process. Journal of Food Safety, 37(1), e12283.
Marinopoulou, A., Papadakis, D., Petridis, D. and Papageorgiou, M. (2020). Monitoring staling of packaged sliced pan breads: Physicochemical properties, sensory evaluation, and consumer preference. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 18(5), 396-412.
Nahar, N., Madzuki, I., Izzah, N., Ab Karim, M., Ghazali, H. and Karim, R. (2019). Bakery science of bread and the effect of salt reduction on quality: A review. Borneo J. Sci. Technol, 1, 9-14.
Rai, S., Kaur, A., Singh, B. and Minhas, K. S. (2012). Quality characteristics of bread produced from wheat, rice and maize flours. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49, 786-789.
Rahmawati, L., Zahra, A. M., Listanti, R., Masithoh, R. E., Hariadi, H., Adnan and Pahlawan, M. F. R. (2023). Necessity of Log (1/R) and Kubelka-Munk transformation in chemometrics analysis to predict white rice flour adulteration in brown rice flour using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy. Food Science and Technology, 43, e116422.
Rasheed, M. S. (2022). The Evaluation of some Heavy Metals in Commonly Wheat Bread With Their Daily Intake. Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, JAFES, 76(1), 15-25.
Sahani, P., Pant, P., Joshi, H. C., Kumar, A. and Srivastava, A. (2024). Key components of food safety management system: Role of equipment cleaning in Panko bread industry. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(11), 127-137.
Salinas, M. V. and Puppo, M. C. (2018). Bread staling: Changes during storage caused by the addition of calcium salts and inulin to wheat flour. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 11, 2067-2078.
Scheuer, P. M., Mattioni, B., Barreto, P. L. M., Montenegro, F. M., Gomes-Ruffi, C. R., Biondi, S. and Francisco, A. D. (2014). Effects of fat replacement on properties of whole wheat bread. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 50, 703-712.
Sakandar, H. A., Hussain, R., Kubow, S., Sadiq, F. A., Huang, W. and Imran, M. (2019). Sourdough bread: A contemporary cereal fermented product. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43(3), e13883.
Saini, R. V., Vaid, P., Saini, N. K., Siwal, S. S., Gupta, V. K., Thakur, V. K. and Saini, A. K. (2021). Recent advancements in the technologies detecting food spoiling agents. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 12(4), 67.
Subramaniyan, V., Subramanian, S. and Sathiavelu, M. (2022). Bread packaging techniques and trends. Italian Journal of Food Safety, 11(4).
Venturi, M., Galli, V., Pini, N., Guerrini, S., Sodi, C. and Granchi, L. (2021). Influence of different leavening agents on technological and nutritional characteristics of whole grain breads obtained from ancient and modern flour varieties. European Food Research and Technology, 247, 1701-1710.
Pradeep Sahani, Prity Pant, H.C. Joshi, Ashok Kumar and Akansha Srivastava (2024). Maintaining Hygiene Standards in Panko Bread Production: Insights into Equipment Cleaning Processes. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(12): 182-188.