Phenotypic, Molecular Detection, and Antibiogram Patterns of E. coli isolates from Respiratory Infections of Commercial Layers in and around Tirupati

Author:

Nagendra Reddy Thopireddy1* and  Surendranath Reddy Somanagari2

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(10): 48-54, 2024

Address:

1Assistant Professor, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Tirupati,

Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati (Andhra Pradesh), India.

 2BVSc & A.H., College of Veterinary Science, Tirupati,

Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati (Andhra Pradesh), India.

(Corresponding author: Nagendra Reddy Thopireddy*)

DOI: -

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

A total of 78 pooled oral swabs, 82 pooled tracheal swabs, 86 pooled nasal swabs, and 25 pooled infraorbital sinus exudates were collected from the ailing birds, which were showing respiratory signs and were labeled farm-wise and specimen-wise. The PCR test was standardized to target the 16s rRNA gene, and the study found that 8 of 12 farms tested positive for E. coli infection. Among the 8 positive farms, 59 out of 78 (75.64% oral swabs), 72 out of 82 (87.80% tracheal swabs), 70 out of 86 (81.39% nasal swabs), and 18 out of 25 (72% infraorbital sinus exudates) were confirmed positive by PCR, with a predicted size of 585 bp for all positives. From the pooled samples, 32 samples (1 from oral swabs, 1 from tracheal swabs, 1 from nasal swabs, and 1 from infraorbital sinus exudate from each of the 8 positive farms) had been evaluated for antimicrobial susceptibility patterns using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. These 32 clinical E. coli isolates were isolated on selective EMB agar and MacConkey agar, which produced greenish metallic sheen and pink colonies, respectively. Gram staining confirmed these colonies, which had an IMViC pattern of ++--. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used to test the antimicrobial patterns of pure clinical respiratory isolates of E. coli. All isolates were resistant to Ceftriaxone (CTR) and Cephalexin (CN), but sensitive to Enrofloxacin (EX), Tetracycline (TE), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Co-trimaxazole (COT), and Colistin (CL). The gold standard test for confirmation of E. coli is isolation and identification of E. coli on EMB agar, which appear as greenish metallic sheen colonies, but the process is laborious and time-consuming. Similar results were obtained with molecular techniques like PCR, a confirmatory test with accurate results but less time-consuming. This study concluded that the prompt detection of respiratory diseases in poultry is accurate using molecular approaches, which will aid in the isolation of E. coli, antibiogram patterns, and the implementation of control measures that will guide the selection of suitable drugs for treatment.

Keywords

layers, E. coli, EMB agar, PCR, antibiogram.


Introduction

India is one of the world's leading producers of eggs and broiler meat, and demand is rising as the population grows, incomes rise, and dietary preferences evolve. Chickens account for over 95% of total egg production in India, with ducks and other poultry species making up the remainder. India ranks 3rd in egg output and 6th in chicken meat production globally. More output is required to meet the ICMR's recommended standards of 180 eggs and 10.8 kg of poultry meat per person per year. Many factors influence productivity; among them, infectious diseases are considered one of the most significant factors. The use of live vaccines, combined with the evolution of many pathogens, has resulted in a rise in disease incidence and resurgence, posing a threat to production. The most common respiratory pathogens, like Mycoplasma, Infectious Bronchitis Virus, Infectious Laryngotracheitis Virus, and E. coli, are the prevalent etiological agents that lead to financial and productivity losses. Avian colibacillosis is one of the major diseases caused by E. coli (Singh et al., 2011). Infected birds exhibit symptoms like cough, respiratory discomfort, poor growth, and productivity (Pang et al., 2002). E. coli, which belongs to the Enterobacteriaceae family and is considered the normal intestinal microflora of humans and birds, is typically present in the pharynx and trachea of birds. It is a gram-negative, non-acid-fast, non-sporulating, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped bacterium that ferments lactose, producing acid and gas. The majority of E. coli strains are non-pathogenic and are referred to as commensals. However, after acquiring certain virulence features, some of these bacteria have gained the ability to thrive in diverse organisms and are known as pathogenic E. coli, which cause clinical symptoms associated with intestinal and extraintestinal illnesses (Kaper et al., 2005). E. coli can be classified into two types: commensals and pathogenic. Pathogenic E. coli is divided into two subgroups: extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) and diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC), both of which cause gastrointestinal illnesses. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), a kind of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), is the cause of avian colibacillosis, an infectious disease in birds. The most common infections in chickens caused by avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) are septicaemia, enteritis, perihepatitis, pericarditis, airsacculitis, egg peritonitis, salpingitis, coligranuloma, omphalitis, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, and decreased egg yield, quality, and hatchability in layers (Dziva et al., 2008). Layers are susceptible to APEC at any time during the growth and laying seasons, particularly during the late laying period and peak egg production, whereas broilers aged 4 to 6 weeks are more vulnerable (Dho-Moulin et al., 1999). In the presence of stressors, APEC invades the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts via abraded tracheal and intestinal epithelium, penetrates deeply into the mucosa and submucosa before entering the bloodstream, and spreads to internal organs, resulting in septicaemia (Dho-Moulin et al., 1999; Dziva et al., 2008; Rodrigo Guabiraba et al., 2015). In most countries, poultry flocks are often raised under intensive conditions using a wide range of antimicrobials (Agunos et al., 2012; Landoni and Albarellos 2015). These antimicrobials are typically given orally with the purpose of preventing and treating disease while also boosting development and production (Page and Gautier 2012). A considerable number of these antimicrobials are regarded as important and critical for human medicine (World Health Organization et al., 2017). The indiscriminate use of antimicrobials in animals has accelerated the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can pose major public health threats (CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA et al., 2019). Furthermore, E. coli has been identified as a natural reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), playing a significant role in the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) (CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA et al., 2019; Partridge et al., 2018), and it is frequently used as an important biomarker for monitoring AMR (Brisola et al., 2019; Poirel et al., 2018). To avoid economic and production losses, it is essential to detect organisms and antibiogram patterns early, as well as propose area-specific medication for treatment.  Regular isolation of organisms is must to know the conformation and antimicrobial pattern for selection of suitable drug. The current work sought to employ molecular approaches to detect E. coli in isolates from layers with respiratory infections and characterize their antimicrobial pattern, thereby assisting in the selection of appropriate treatments and control methods to prevent economic losses in the poultry industry.

Material & Methods

Sample collection: Samples were collected from 12 commercial layer farms located in and around Tirupati. A total of 78 pooled oral swabs, 82 pooled tracheal swabs, 86 pooled nasal swabs, and 25 pooled infraorbital sinus exudates were collected from the ailing birds, which were showing respiratory signs and were labeled farm-wise and specimen-wise. 

Isolation and identification of Escherichia coli: After collection, the samples were inoculated into sterile test tubes containing nutrient broth and aerobically incubated at 37 °C in a bacteriological incubator for 24 hours. Following incubation, the inoculum was spread onto MacConkey agar and Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. Later, the inoculated plates were examined for pink-colored colonies on MCA and greenish metallic sheen colonies on EMB agar. To confirm, the colonies on EMB agar plates were subjected to gram staining and biochemical tests, viz., IMViC tests (indole production, methyl red, Voges Proskauer, citrate test), catalase test, urine production, and nitrate reduction tests, and the organisms showed the IMVC pattern of ++-- (Edwards et al., 1972).

DNA Isolation: DNA isolation was done using the boiling and snap-chilling processes. Initially, E. coli isolates that had been cultured and biochemically confirmed were incubated in nutrient broth at 37 °C overnight. After 18 hours, 1.5 mL of the enriched broth culture was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 10,000 rpm and the pellet was resuspended in 100 µL of nuclease-free water. This mixture was heated in a boiling water bath at 100 °C for 10 minutes before being rapidly chilled in an ice box at -20 °C and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was stored at -20 °C and utilized as a DNA template in the PCR assay. DNA concentration was determined using Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): All extracted DNA samples were submitted to PCR using particular primers to target the 16s rRNA gene for species-specific characterization. Table 1 lists the primers used in the investigation. The reaction used 12.5 μl of master mix, 4 μl of DNA template, 1 μl of forward and reverse primer, and 6.5 μl of nuclease-free water for a total of 25 μl. The PCR reaction was carried out in a thermal cycler with a heated cover under standardized cycling conditions, as indicated in Table 2. The amplified PCR products obtained after the reaction were run through 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis in a horizontal electrophoresis apparatus at 5 V/cm and ethidium bromide at 0.5 μg/ml. The Alpha Innotech gel documentation system was used to examine the gel under UV transillumination in order to observe the bands. 

Table 1: Primers used for detection of E. coli (Nagendra Reddy Thopireddy, 2023).

Primers

Primer Sequence (5’to 3’)

Amplicon size

16s rRNA gene-F

5’-GACCTCGGTTTAGTTCACAGA-3’

585 bp

16s rRNA gene-R

5’-CACACGTGACGCTGACCA-3’



Table 2: Cyclic conditions used for amplification of 16s rRNA gene of E. coli

Sr. No.

Step

Temperature (°C)

Time

No of cycles

1.

Initial Denaturation

95°C

5 min

1

2.

Denaturation

94°C

30 sec

35

3.

Annealing

62°C

30 sec

4.

Extension

72°C

30 sec

5.

Final extension

72°C

2 min

1


Antimicrobial Sensitivity Test: The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used to assess antibiotic susceptibility patterns in 32 E. coli isolates, and the results were interpreted as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) in accordance with CSLI (2021). E. coli overnight cultures were infused into sterile PBS and matched to the 0.5 MacFarland turbidity standard. A sterile swab dipped in the bacterial suspension was equally distributed throughout the Mueller-Hinton agar plate. Antimicrobial discs were placed on the agar, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours.

Results & Discussion

Out of 271 samples, 219 were positive for E. coli, with an overall prevalence rate of 80.81%. On testing, 8 farms out of 12 were found positive for the E. coli infection. Among the 8 positive farms, 59 out of 78 (75.64% oral swabs), 72 out of 82 (87.80% tracheal swabs), 70 out of 86 (81.39% nasal swabs), and 18 out of 25 (72% infraorbital sinus exudates), totaling 219, were confirmed positive by PCR, which produced a predicted size of 585 bp in all positives. Random selection of the isolated E. coli was performed, and 32 [4 (1 from oral swabs, 1 from tracheal swabs, 1 from nasal swabs, and 1 from infraorbital sinus exudate) from each positive farm] isolates were chosen and then subjected to antimicrobial sensitivity tests. The highest resistance was observed for Cephalexin (100%) and Ceftriaxone (100%). The highest sensitivity was observed for Cotrimaxazole (65.62%), followed by Tetracycline (28.12%), Enrofloxacin (25%), Ciprofloxacin (21.87%), and Colistin (15.62%) (Table 3).

Table 3: Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of E. coli isolates from respiratory infections of commercial layers.

Sr. No.

Antimicrobial agents

Sensitive

Intermediate

Resistant

1.

Ceftriaxone (CTR), 10μg

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

32 (100%)

2.

Cephalexin (CN), 30μg

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

32 (100%)

3.

Tetracycline (TE), 30μg

9 (28.12%)

5 (15.62%)

18 (56.25%)

4.

Enrofloxacin (EX), 5μg

8 (25%)

7 (21.85%)

17 (53.12%)

5.

Cotrimaxazole, (COT), 25μg

21 (65.62%)

1 (3.12%)

10 (31.25%)

6.

Ciprofloxacin (CIP), 5μg

7 (21.87%)

6 (18.75%)

19 (59.37%)

7.

Colistin (CL), 10μg

5 (15.62%)

4 (12.5%)

23 (71.85%)

Fig. 1. Antibiotic sensitivity patterns of E. coli isolates.

DISCUSSION

E. coli belongs to the Enterobacteriaceae family. E. coli can be classified into two types: commensals and pathogenic. Pathogenic E. coli is divided into two subgroups: extra intestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) and diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC). ExPEC is further divided into six subpathotypes: uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), sepsis/newborn meningitis-associated E. coli (NMEC), avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) (Kunert Filho et al., 2015), sepsis-associated pathogenic E. coli (SePEC) (Mokady et al., 2005), mammary pathogenic E. coli (MPEC) (Shpigel et al., 2008), and endometrial pathogenic E. coli (EnPEC). DEC is divided into eight subpathotypes: enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) (Huang et al., 2006), adherent invasive E. coli (AIEC), and Shiga-toxin-producing enteroaggregative E. coli (STEAEC).

APEC can cause both systemic and localized forms of colibacillosis, acting as a primary or secondary agent. The most prevalent localized infections caused by APEC as the primary pathogen are omphalitis, yolk sac infections, and reproductive tract infections (Landman et al., 2013). E. coli, as a secondary pathogen, contributes to respiratory colibacillosis and causes colisepticemia. Colisepticemia develops secondary to viral infections such as Newcastle disease (NDV), avian influenza (AIV), infectious bronchitis (IBV), Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG), immunosuppressive diseases (infectious bursal disease (IBD)), and stressors (overcrowding, excessive dust, and ammonia levels) (Dho-Moulin et al., 1999; Ghunaim et al., 2014).

In all 12 poultry farms, clinical signs including ruffled feathers, nasal discharges, facial swelling, labored breathing, huddling, depression, sinus swelling, a decrease in egg production and poor egg quality, reluctance to stand or move, decreased food and water consumption, and complete or extreme prostration. Similar observations were documented by Ramasamy et al. (2008); Gowthman et al. (2013); De Carli et al. (2014); Veeraselvam et al. (2019); Thopireddyet al.(2023). The current study identified E. coli as the predominant concurrent infectious agent linked with respiratory disease complex in eight farms (80.81%), corroborating the findings of previous researchers (Gowthaman et al., 2013; Chowdhury et al., 2018; Kaore et al., 2018).

Post-mortem examination of affected birds revealed polyserositis characterized by white to yellow exudates on the liver surface (fibrinous perihepatitis), heart (fibrinous pericarditis), (Fig. 2), and intestines (peritonitis), along with blood vessel congestion and lung consolidation indicative of severe E. coli infection (Yadav et al., 2018; Surjagade et al., 2020; Halder et al., 2021). The study also identified an acute form of the disease marked by septicemia leading to death and a subacute form characterized by pericarditis, airsacculitis, and perihepatitis, as reported by Dhama et al. (2013); Dadheech et al. (2016) ; Thopireddy (2023).

Fig. 2. PM examination of the affected bird showing pericarditis and perihepatitis.

Isolation and identification of E. coli. After 24 hours of incubation at 37°C in aerobic conditions, all E. coli positive isolates on MacConkey agar exhibited lactose-fermenting pink colonies (Fig. 3), whereas E. coli colonies on EMB agar exhibited greenish metallic sheen (Fig. 4), consistent with findings by Matin et al. (2017); Veeraselvam et al. (2019); Surjagade et al.(2020); Thopireddy et al. (2023). The E. coli isolates appeared as pink-colored gram-negative bacilli, occurring singly or in pairs, (Fig. 5), aligning with observations by Amer et al. (2015); Boro et al.(2019). All E. coli isolates displayed an IMViC pattern of ++-- (Edwards et al. 1972), were urease negative, catalase positive, and oxidase negative, paralleling results reported by Amin et al. (2017); Ibrahim et al. (2019); Nagendra Reddy et al. (2023).

Fig. 3. MCA showing pink colored colonies of E. coli.

Fig. 4. EMB agar showing greenish metallic colonies of E. coli.

Fig. 5. Gram staining showing pink coccobacillary rods of E. coli.

Fig. 6. IMViC tests pattern for E. coli (1. Indole test-positive, 2. Methyl red-positive, 3. Vp test-negative, 4. Citrate test-negative).

All suspected samples (271 samples) from 12 farms were initially tested for E. coli by targeting 16sr RNA gene and the study found that 8 farms with a total of 219 samples, of which 59 (74.64% from oral swabs), 72 (87.80% from tracheal swabs), 70 (81.39% from nasal swabs), and 18 (72% from in fraorbital sinus exudates) tested positive. These results are higher than those reported by Nayak et al. (2017), who found a positivity rate of 14.2% in both tracheal and nasal swabs, and align with Banu et al. (2017), who reported a positivity rate of 57% in tracheal swabs and 57.1% in infraorbital sinus exudates. The current study observed an E. coli isolation rate of 80.8%, similar findings have been reported by other researchers, 80% by Tonu et al. (2011), 82.83% by Ievy et al. (2020) and 100% by Ibrahim et al. (2019). The high isolation rate of E. coli observed in our study, as well as in others, could be due to stringent adherence to microbiological isolation techniques, resulting in improved bacterial recovery. Such a high rate of isolation, positions E. coli as an ideal candidate for assessing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevalence and patterns across various production systems, including layer poultry farms (Mudenda et al., 2023).

An investigation in Andhra Pradesh identified E. coli on 12 farms, with a PCR positivity rate of 63.15% and a SYBR Green Real Time PCR positivity rate of 71.2%. On these farms, PCR detected E. coli in 92 nasal swabs (40.35%), 106 tracheal swabs (51.75%), 64 tracheal tissues (42.10%), and 72 lung tissues (47.36%). Furthermore, 118 nasal swabs (49.56%), 128 tracheal swabs (56.14%), 68 tracheal tissues (44.73%), and 77 lung tissues (50.65%) tested positive for SYBR Green Real Time PCR by Nagendra Reddy et al. (2023).

Fig. 7. Data table representing sample size.

Molecular characterization of E. coli. This work used PCR to quickly identify 16s rRNA gene of E. coli. The technique used DNA isolated from E. coli isolates and PCR primers specific to the 16s rRNA gene, which resulted in a 585 bp amplicon confirming E. coli presence. 16s rRNA was identified in 219 of 271 samples using PCR, corroborating the findings of Tonu et al. (2011); Islam et al. (2014); Matin et al. (2017).

Fig. 8. Agarose gel displaying the 585 bpE. coli 16s rRNA gene product amplified by PCR.

Antibiotic sensitivity of E. coli. E. coli includes a large number of antibiotic resistance genes, including beta-lactam resistance genes. The presence of beta-lactam antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli causes the production of beta-lactamase enzymes, which hydrolyze β-lactam antibiotics, a frequent resistance mechanism in the Enterobacteriaceae family (Pitoutet al., 1998). ESBLs are enzymes that efficiently hydrolyze third and fourth-generation cephalosporins and monobactams (e.g., aztreonam), but are inhibited by β-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanic acid and tazobactam (Fernandes et al., 2014). Furthermore, ESBL-producing E. coli frequently exhibits resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobials, primarily fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim, and tetracyclines (Bonnet et al., 2004). The major genes involved in ESBL production are the TEM (blaTEM), SHV (blaSHV), and CTX-M (blaCTX-M) genes. CTX-M-type ESBL-producing E. coli is the most common worldwide (Pfeifer et al., 2010).

Our investigation found that E. coli was resistant to Tetracycline (56.25%) and Cotrimaxazole (31.25%), which is consistent with research on laying hens in Zambia by Mudenda et al. (2023). In contrast, a study from commercial farms in Zambia's Chisamba district by Mtonga et al. (2021) reported a 100% resistance of E. coli to Tetracycline. Additionally, a high resistance rate to Colistin (71.85%) was detected, echoing the results of Hess et al., (2022). Our research indicated that the resistance of E. coli to Cephalexin was the highest (100%), with resistance to Ciprofloxacin and Enrofloxacin at 59.37% and 53.12%, respectively, corroborating Khanal et al. (2017) findings. Similarly, our study discovered E. coli to be highly resistant to Ceftriaxone (100%), which was also found in a study by Islam et al. (2023), that revealed Escherichia coli isolates demonstrating resistance to several cephalosporin antibiotics, ranging from 2.3% to 100% (95% CI ranged from 0.4% to 100%) for Ceftriaxone. 

Conclusion

E. coli is the most frequent bacterial infection in poultry, causing significant economic losses globally. Controlling E. coli improves both animal and human health. Present study found that E. coli isolates from layers in and around Tirupati are resistant to at least one of the antimicrobial agents tested. Given the serious antimicrobial resistance (AMR) conditions, there's a pressing need to curtail antibiotic use, especially in layer farms. The emergence of significant antibiotic resistance and the high risk of transmitting resistant bacteria and genes to humans necessitate the development of new antibacterials for exclusive use in animals, without cross-resistance to existing antibiotics. This could be a viable solution for the future. It's crucial to enhance awareness and conduct scientific research through monitoring and surveillance programs on AMR to mitigate the adverse impacts of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli in the poultry industry.

References

Agunos, A., Léger, D., and Carson, C. (2012). Review of antimicrobial therapy of selected bacterial diseases in broiler chickens in Canada. The Canadian Veterinary Journal53(12), 1289.

Amer, M. M., Bastamy, M. A., Ibrahim, H. M. and   Salim, M. M. (2015). Isolation and characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli from broiler chickens in some Governorates of Egypt. Veterinary Medical Journal Giza61, 1-7.

Banu, H., Ali, M. Z, Akther, S., Paul, P., Islam, M, A. and  Khatun, M. M. (2017). Isolation and Molecular Characterization of E. coli, Salmonella spp. and Pasteurella spp. from Apparently Healthy Duck. International Journal of Animal Biology, 3(3), 12-17. 

Bonnet, R. (2004). Growing group of extended-spectrum β-lactamases: the CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy48(1), 1-14.

Boro, S. K., Pathak, D. C., Saikia, G. K., and Buragohain, M. (2018). Prevalence of Colibacillosis in birds in and around Guwahati city (Assam). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 6(1), 1000-1003.

Brisola, M. C., Crecencio, R. B., Bitner, D. S., Frigo, A., Rampazzo, L., Stefani, L. M. and  Faria, G. A. (2019). Escherichia coli used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms of Southern Brazil. Science of the total environment647, 362-368.

CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019

Chowdhury, S., Masuduzzamanm, M. and Shatu, S. N. (2009). A pathological investigation to identify different forms of Colibacillosis in commercial broiler and layer birds in Chattogram region. Eco-friendly Agricultural Journal2, 368–373.

Dho-Moulin, M., and Fairbrother, J. M. (1999). Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Veterinary research, 30, 2-3, 299-316.

Dziva, F. and  Stevens, M. P. (2008). Colibacillosis in poultry: unravelling the molecular basis of virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in their natural hosts. Avian Pathology37(4), 355–366. 

Ghunaim, H., Abu-Madi, M. A., and Kariyawasam, S. (2014). Advances in vaccination against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli respiratory disease: potentials and limitations. Vet Microbiol.,  6, 172(1-2), 13-22. 

Gowthaman, V., Singh, S. D., Dhama, K., Barathidasan,  R. and Anjaneya Bhatt, P. (2013). Avian Pathogenic E. coli associated with respiratory disease complications in poultry. Veterinary Practitioner, 14, 430-431.

Hess, C., Troxler, S., Jandreski-Cvetkovic, D., Zloch, A. and Hess, M. (2022). Escherichia coli Isolated from Organic Laying Hens Reveal a High Level of Antimicrobial Resistance despite No Antimicrobial Treatments. Antibiotics11(4), 467. 

Huang, D. B., Mohanty, A., DuPont, H. L., Okhuysen, P. C. and Chiang, T. (2006). A review of an emerging enteric pathogen: enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol., 55(10), 1303-1311. 

Ibrahim, R. A., Cryer, T. L., Lafi, S. Q., Basha, E. A., Good, L. and Tarazi, Y. H. (2019). Identification of Escherichia coli from broiler chickens in Jordan, their antimicrobial resistance, gene characterization and the associated risk factors. BMC veterinary research15(1), 1-16. 

Ievy, S., Islam, M. S., Sobur, M. A., Talukder, M., Rahman, M. B., Khan, M. F. R. and Rahman, M. T. (2020). Molecular detection of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) for the first time in layer farms in Bangladesh and their antibiotic resistance patterns. Microorganisms8(7), 1021.

Islam (2014). Prevalence of colibacillosis in chickens in Gazipur district. M S Thesis, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

Islam, Md., Saiful, Hossain, Md., Jannat, Sobur, Md., Abdus., Punom., Sadia Afrin., Rahman, A. M. M., Taufiquer, Rahman, Md. and  Tanvir, A. (2023). Systematic Review on the Occurrence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli in Poultry and Poultry Environments in Bangladesh between 2010 and 2021, BioMed Research International,  2425564.  

Kaore, M., Singh, K. P., Palanivelu, M., Kumar, Ashok Kuimar, M., Reddy, M. R .and Kurkure, N. V. (2018). Patho-epidemiology of respiratory disease complex pathogens (RDCPs) in commercial chicken. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology, 42(4), 231-238.

Kaper, J. B. (2005). Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Int J Med Microbiol., 295(6-7), 355-6.

Khanal, T. and Raut, S. B. and  Paneru, Uddhav (2017). Study of Antibiotic Resistance on Escherichia Coli in Commercial Poultry of Nepal. Nepalese Veterinary Journal, 34, 6-17. 

Landman, W., Heuvelink, Annet and Eck, J. (2013). Reproduction of the Escherichia coli peritonitis syndrome in laying hens. Avian pathology. journal of the W.V.P.A, 42, 157-62. 

Landoni, Fabiana and  Albarellos, Gabriela (2015). The use of antimicrobial agents in broiler chickens. The Veterinary Journal, 205. 

MatinMd, Islam Md, A. and Khatun, M. M. (2017). Prevalence of colibacillosis in chickens in greater Mymensingh district of Bangladesh. Veterinary World, 10(1), 29-33. 

Mokady, Daphna,  Gophna, Uri, Ron, Eliora (2005). Virulence factors of septicemic Escherichia coli strains. International journal of medical microbiology, 295, 455-62. 

Mtonga, Samson, Nyirenda, Stanley, Mulemba, Sichalwe, Ziba, Maureen, Muuka, Geoffrey and Fandamu, Paul (2021). Epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of pathogenic E. coli in chickens from selected poultry farms in Zambia. Journal of Zoonotic Diseases, 5. 

Nagendra Reddy, T. (2023). Isolation and Molecular detection of E.coli from common Respiratory infections of poultry in A.P. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 5(1),30.

Page, S. and  Gautier, P. (2012). Use of antimicrobial agents in Livestock. Revue scientifiqueet technique (International Office of Epizootics), 31, 145-188. 

Partridge, S. R, Kwong, S. M, Firth, N., and Jensen, S. O. (2018). Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev.,  31(4), e00088-17. 

Pitout, J. D., Thomson, K. S., Hanson, N. D., Ehrhardt, A. F., Moland, E. S., and Sanders, C. C. (1998) beta-Lactamases responsible for resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis isolates recovered in South Africa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 42(6), 1350-1354.

Poirel, L., Madec, J. Y., Lupo, A., Schink, A. K., Kieffer, N., Nordmann, P. and Schwarz, S. (2018). Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr, 6(4).

Ramasamy, T. N., Dorairajan, G. A., Balasubramaniam, A. M., Dinakaran and K, Saravanabava (2008). Pathogenic bacteria related to respiratory diseases in poultry with reference to Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolated in India. Veterinarski Arhiv, 78(2), 131-140.

Shpigel, N.Y., Elazar, S., Rosenshine, I. (2008). Mammary pathogenic Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Microbiol., 11(1), 60-65.

Singh, Manjinder, Reynolds, David and  Das, K. C. (2011). Microalgal system for treatment of effluent from poultry litter anaerobic digestion. Bioresource technology, 102. 

Tonu, N. S., Sufian, M. A., Sarker, S., Kamal, M. M., Rahman, M. H. and Hossain, M. M. (2011). Pathological study on colibacillosis in chickens and detection of Escherichia coli by PCR. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 9(1), 17-25. 

Veeraselvam, M., Senthilkumar, N. R., Vairamuthu, S. and Ramakrishnan, V. (2019). Isolation and identification of bacterial agents causing respiratory infection in native chicken. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies7(4), 162-167.

World Health Organization and  WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (‎AGISAR)‎. (2017)‎.Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine: ranking of antimicrobial agents for risk management of antimicrobial resistance due to non-human use, 5th rev. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/255027.

How to cite this article

Nagendra Reddy Thopireddy and  Surendranath Reddy Somanagari (2024). Phenotypic, Molecular Detection, and Antibiogram Patterns of E. coli isolates from Respiratory Infections of Commercial Layers in and around Tirupati. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(10): 48-54.