Author: Vinushree R., Ashish Baluni*, Megha J. and Chetan Mahadev Rudrapur
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(7): 341-347, 2024
Address:
Department of Agricultural Statistics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India.
(Corresponding author: Ashish Baluni*)
DOI: -
The daily rainfall data (1988-2018) were analysed to extrapolate maximum rainfall in Dharwad district of Karnataka state, India. Newer run-off model was formulated to study the different cropping patterns@ different significant levels. Absolute rainfall data were divided into 23 sets viz. one- annual and four seasons (June to September) were Standardized based on different meteorological weeks (23-39rd SMW). The model findings showed that, the annual maximum daily rainfall IQR ranged between (23.14-83.44) mm indicated with large amount of fluctuation of rainfall because due to periodic changing of the weather parameters and global warming. Asper the models diagnostic checking, the runoff- probability forecasted distribution model was found to be best fit to optimize the absolute daily rainfall. Our formulated model will be very useful for the agricultural scientists for designing of cropping patterns and also it can be served as navigation tool for the meteorologists, agricultural policy planners and researchers for the holistic development of soil conservation strategies and irrigation purpose in the developing countries.
Maximum daily rainfall, Probability distributions, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Rainfall is one of the most important natural resources for the growth of agricultural crops. The maximum rainfall is related to natural systems and unpredictable seasons. Paucity of mathematical/statistical computer-aided predictive modelling techniques makes the forecasting of rainfalls (uncertainties and likelihoods), the major biggest problems facing the world today. Rainfall and temperature variations are caused by environmental factors and are affected by the cyclone's periodic effects. One of the difficult worldwide challenges of the day is how to accurately identify rainfall and other meteorological conditions. The effectiveness of agricultural cultivation and irrigation will be determined by on time frame. The long-term study of rainfalls is necessary to carry out planning and cultivating crops. However, success and failure depends on various rainfall conditions. It is closely correlated with the weather forecast. Imbalanced weather conditions had a significant impact on human resources, farming, management and crop production. The weather is extremely complicated, making it difficult to choose the best choice for crop production. Due to the negative impacts of climatic conditions, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and other bacterial infections have spread throughout the world, discouraging farmers and agricultural specialists from focusing on managing agricultural resources, such as imports and exports to a global level (distribution of seeds, fertilisers and agricultural equipment's etc. Accordingly, the explanation of heavy rainfall encourages taking into account unexpected events that make projecting future output and economic losses. For the management of crops and the adoption of modern agricultural policies for changing the cropping pattern to a greater extent, simulation data driven prediction support modelling is absolutely critical. The present analytical study will help the prediction of rainfall and management of water and natural resources. This navigated formulated model will be the greatest advantage for forecasting weather parameters, floods, cyclonic seasonal variations and drought prone areas at national level. This study attempt to determine to formulate various probability distribution models to optimize the maximum daily rainfall.
Thrust area. Dharwad district was purposively selected for the study, it is located in the north-western part of Karnataka, co-ordinated @ 15°27′30″ North and East @ 75°00′30″. As experienced tropical wet climate, (the similar ≈741 meter above the sea level). The boundary was encompassed with a geographical area of 4263 sq. kms. South-west monsoon is the most common which can be received maximum rain fall. An average annual rainfall was ≈ 864 mm (over five years). Very less rainfall was recorded in winter instead of summer season. Humid/dry weather in Feb to early June month, the highest quantity during precipitations with mean temperature (24.1°C). The hot climate in the summer (April–May) and nice throughout the year. The hot season begins from March to Jun with the highest temperature of (38oC) and lowest temperature (14oC) during the month of December (freezing month). After SARS-CoV-2 pandemic attacked, all weather parameters have been changed, periodically hitting cyclones and got maximum rain fall in the year 2021 -2022 (regular rainfall > 1800mm). Under these conditions, the net crop sown area is very less in Dharwad district in 2020-2022; it will have a significant impact on both economic security and crop yields. The accurate likelihood estimation of rainfall is very essential for estimation of cause and effect relationship between the climatic conditions and cropping patterns at national level. In this practical manner, we have formulated newer run off -model for absolute estimation and its likelihoods. A preliminary stage, the sample data were used to demonstrate our projected models. The selection of sample has drawn from the total geographical areas it was determined by the following eqn (1)
(1)
Where, Xi = Random sample, i= 1, 2,…, n ;
CDF =F(x)= [number of observations ≤ x] .
This test was used to decide the samples drawn from hypothesized distribution. Finally, we have formulated probability distribution models to optimize the exact rainfall. The above methodology will also be used for studying the probability distribution pattern for other disciplines. In case of model formulation, we used daily rainfall data besides with different weather parameters between (1988-2022), the data was collected from the Department of Agricultural Meteorology, Government of Karnataka and University of Agricultural Science , Dharwad. The primary and secondary data were used for demonstration of the formulated model.
Model formulation
(2)
Where,
Yijk = Observed rail fall for ith village jth district kth cluster
αi = Effect of ith village from rain fall
βjk = Interaction effect of rail fall on jth districts kth cluster
tk = The rain fall seasons at kth clusters
εijk = Error associated with ith village jth districts kth cluster
In equation (1) we predicated the random process of and correlation of rainfall in selected villages. The average rainfall was estimated for building the interaction effects with noisy data sets in eqn (2)
(3)
ni = Number of years attributed to the average rainfall occurs in particular seasons
For the elimination of noisy data below the average rainfall in the particular districts, we build the models in following eqn (4)
(4)
Run- off Predictive model (RPM). The runoff- model is versatile and robust analytical algorithmic predictive model, that was confined to estimates the absolute rain fall in the selected areas. Mainly we substituted infiltrations, evapotranspiration, and depression storage and drainage losses in particular agriculture crops. Evolving of runoff model which is consisted too- many factors of random variables ‘Xi’. The random variables ‘Xi’ is normally distributed (Gaussian distribution) with mean μ, and variance σ2.
The cumulative estimation of rain fall in the Gaussian distribution attributed with rv’s is estimated in the eqn (5) (5) The most widely used non parametric method is the kernel density estimates .We describing the initial losses of random variables {X1, X2, …. Xn}
with kernel function k(.), the probability density function (PDF) can be estimated in the eqn (6)
(6)
where ‘h’ is smoothing factor, known as the bandwidth and K(.) is the Gaussian Kernel density with distribution
(7) The bandwidth is the most important characteristics of a Kernel density estimates (KDE) with a strong association between shape and scale parameters of PDF
(8)
Where, the IQR is the Interquartile range of rainfall in the selected years @ time ‘t’ and ‘σ’ is the sample standard deviation.
In case of rainfall-runoff modelling, the loss parameter is one of the most important parameter, which can describe the total amount of rainfall. Which was estimated by using infiltration, evapotranspiration, interception, depression storage and transmission losses etc. The several parameters were considered for the formulation of modelling eqn (9)
(9)
Where tα/2 = hypothetical table value (1.96)
N = Number of selected waste hr/soil parameters
β0, β1, β2 … βn is the coefficients of random variables of xi (Soil moisture, water wastage from drainage, ground water layer, soil condition/types of soil, turbidity of the soil etc).
These parametric distributions rely on the assumption that the population (which the observed data sample belongs to) has an underlying parental distribution. These results were observed from the kernel density function. A nonparametric approaches also been used to correlated prior and posterior information’s of rainfall. However, we substituted both assumptions that have been demonstrated by underlying probability distribution. This method will be, relies heavily depends on the absolute rainfall data and its empirical grouping of individual bins. This model based study has compared for both parametric and nonparametric distributions @ initial losses of rainfall and outlier effects on periodicity of cyclones.
(10)
Where,
f (x) = The function f(x) describes the absolute rainfall yield with (x) random process
n = Number of weather parameters responsible for RF
k = Number of success of geographical areas selected for likelihood estimation
ai = Regression intercept (point of infelcxion)
βij = Regression coefficient with respect to different parameter under concern
(At ith traits with jth areas )
εij = Residual error with ith traits with jth areas.
(α = k + 1) ; (β = n – k + 1)
Example
α = k + 1 = (7 + 1) = 8, β = 10 – 7 + 1 = 4
The random behaviour of proportion of runoff rate was modelled by β-distribution. It provides powerful tool quantify the likelihood estimation tasks. The probability density function is
(11)
Beta distribution is the conjugate of Binomial distribution
BD (12)
(13)
One day maximum daily rainfall corresponding date for the period of 31 years (1988-2018) is presented in the Table 1. The maximum (83.44 mm) and minimum (23.14 mm) annual one day maximum rainfall was recorded during the year 2000 (11th June) and 2016 (28th June) respectively. This indicates that the most fluctuations were observed during the decade 2000-11. The average for these 31 years rainfall was found to be 41.23 mm. It was also observed that 14 years (45.16%) received one day maximum daily rainfall above the average, however, no general trend in rainfall occurrence was observed during the study period. Fig. 1 shows the variation in one day maximum daily rainfall. The distribution of one day maximum rainfall received during different months in a year is presented in Fig. 2. From the Fig. 2, it can be seen that June received the highest amount of one day maximum rainfall (23%) followed by July (16%), September (16%) and October (16%) (Singh et al., 2012).
The data was classified into 23 sets as mentioned in the Table 2 viz., 1 annual, 1 seasonal, 4 seasonal months and 17 seasonal SMW’s to study the distribution pattern of rainfall at different levels.
Fig. 1. Geographical distribution of rainfall in Karnataka State.
Fig. 2. Absolute mean earth surface temperature in Dharwad District.
Table 1: One day maximum daily rainfall for the period of 1988 to 2018.
Year(t) | Days | Rainfall (mm) | Year(t) | Days | Rainfall (mm) |
1988 | Jul-18 | 33.29 | 2007 | Sep-17 | 50.01 |
1989 | Sep-20 | 60.66 | 2008 | Mar-22 | 43.99 |
1990 | May-27 | 23.64 | 2009 | Oct-01 | 65.49 |
1991 | Jun-06 | 62.38 | 2010 | Sept-23 | 37.25 |
1992 | Nov-18 | 36.88 | 2011 | Aug-19 | 42.71 |
1993 | Oct-18 | 46.59 | 2012 | Nov-01 | 42.86 |
1994 | Apr-12 | 50.5 | 2013 | Jun-05 | 34.61 |
1995 | Jul-07 | 26.57 | 2014 | Oct-25 | 40.02 |
1996 | Sep-05 | 45.55 | 2015 | Aug-17 | 33.15 |
1997 | Jun-14 | 41.3 | 2016 | Jun-22 | 23.14 |
1998 | Aug-21 | 38.69 | 2017 | Sep-28 | 29.06 |
1999 | Jul-21 | 31.43 | 2018 | Jun-02 | 27.06 |
2000 | Jun-11 | 84.44 | 2019 | Jul-23 | 34.22 |
2001 | Oct-07 | 27.22 | 2020 | Aug-21 | 40.25 |
2002 | Aug-01 | 66.9 | 2021 | Oct-15 | 55.22 |
2003 | Oct-5 | 23.46 | 2022 | Sep -17 | 76.52 |
2004 | Jul-12 | 31.31 | - | - | - |
2005 | Jul-25 | 41.49 | - | - | - |
2006 | Jun-9 | 36.47 | - | - | - |
3.91 10.85 meters below ground level in 2015 to 3.91 meters below ground level in 2019.
Table 2: Parameters of the best fit probability distributions for maximum daily rainfall.
Study Period | Range | Best fit | Parameters | ||
Shape (k) | Scale (β) | Location (µ) | |||
Annual | Jan 1- Dec 31 | Log-normal | 0.322 | 3.665 | - |
Seasonal | Jun1- Sep30 | Log-normal | 0.341 | 3.595 | - |
June | Jun 1- Jun 30 | Log-normal | 0.407 | 3.27 | - |
July | Jul 1- Jul 31 | GEV | 9.294 | 21.492 | 0.033 |
August | Aug 1- Aug 31 | Log-normal | 0.37 | 3.041 | - |
September | Sep 1- Sep 30 | Log-normal | 0.617 | 2.971 | - |
23rd SMW | Jun 4- Jun 10 | GEV | 7.99 | 12.637 | 0.115 |
24th SMW | Jun 11- Jun 17 | Log-normal | 0.596 | 2.788 | - |
25th SMW | Jun 18- Jun 24 | Log-normal | 0.739 | 2.472 | - |
26th SMW | Jun 25- Jul 1 | GEV | 5.545 | 9.447 | 0.012 |
27th SMW | Jul 2- Jul 8 | Weibull (2P) | 1.938 | 14.914 | - |
28th SMW | Jul 9- Jul 15 | Gamma (2P) | 2.374 | 6.749 | - |
29th SMW | Jul 16- Jul 22 | Log-normal | 0.721 | 2.486 | - |
30th SMW | Jul 23- Jul 29 | Gamma (2P) | 1.644 | 9.838 | - |
31st SMW | Jul 30- Aug 5 | Log-normal | 0.796 | 2.334 | - |
32nd SMW | Aug 6-Aug 12 | Weibull (2P) | 1.633 | 13.896 | - |
33rd SMW | Aug13-Aug31 | Log-normal | 0.713 | 2.29 | - |
34th SMW | Aug 20- Aug26 | Log-normal | 0.759 | 2.327 | - |
35th SMW | Aug 27-Sep2 | Weibull (2P) | 1.514 | 13.81 | - |
36th SMW | Sep3-Sep9 | Gamma (2P) | 1.384 | 6.487 | - |
37th SMW | Sep10- Sep16 | Weibull (2P) | 1.05 | 10.293 | - |
38th SMW | Sep17- Sep23 | Weibull (3P) | 0.924 | 12.148 | 0.471 |
39th SMW | Sep24- Sep30 | Gamma (2P) | 1.884 | 8.255 | - |
Fig. 3. Year wise annual maximum daily rainfall (in mm).
Fig. 4. Distribution of one day maximum annual rainfall in a year.
Fig. 5. Extrapolation of minimum rainfall by exponential smoothening by Gaussian.
From the formulated model the analysis observed that majority of the data sets Log-normal distribution was found to be the best fit probability distribution. Similar results were obtained by Manikandan et al. (2011). Further, majority of the study periods were observed to be scale dominated which showed large variation in the distribution of rainfall. The best fit probability distributions for maximum daily rainfall on different sets of data were identified based on the criteria of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. A similar study was conducted by Nassif et al. (2021). The distributions such as Normal, Log-normal, Gamma (2P), GEV and Weibull (2P) were found to be the best fit for all the study periods. During the month of August, 25th, 28th, 35th and 38th SMW’s, Weibull (3P) distribution fitted well along with the distributions mentioned above. For annual, seasonal, June, August and September study periods, Log-normal was found to be the best fit probability distribution. For July month, GEV distribution fitted well with the lowest test statistic value and the highest p-value. For the 24th, 25th, 29th, 31th, 33th and 34th SMW’s, Log-normal was found as the best fit probability distribution, for 28th, 30th, 36th and 39th SMW’s, Gamma (2P) was found as the best fit probability distribution, for 27th, 32nd, 35th and 37th SMW’s, Weibull (2P) was found as the best fit probability distribution, for 23rd and 26th SMW’s, GEV was found as the best fit probability distribution and for 38th SMW, Weibull (3P) was found as the best fit probability distribution with the lowest test statistic value and the highest p-value. In this formulated model we demonstrated real data sets at possible iteration to optimize by means of combining state variables. We start with above formulated predictive models, which are supposed to have been developed in design phase of RF estimation. As an example, eqn (10) parameter of the model we can optimize by means of historical data sets as part of the optimizing techniques, as model construction we substituted different state variables like too many weather parameters, RF geographical area, runoff surface flow, wind blow, earth surface temperature , wind pressure and ocean current etc. Due to outlier state variable model (heavy rainfall due to occurrence of periodic cyclone, flood, drastic changes of climate for heavy RF, biotic intervention etc), the model was rebooted and lead with large inherent uncertainty (estimated errors has deeply penetrated to reproduce imbalance forecasted figures).The above critical circumstances, the model can able to allow the substitution parameters to render the absolute forecasted figures (set of forecasted quality) for usual interpretations. For a regression model eqn () without unobserved components, such as predicted model, the error statistics are the same as forecast error
statistics. A similar forecasted model was fitted by (Erich J. Plate 2015), Asper his model predicted values, the errors are varied by means of substitution of large number of parameters and also every iteration can be precluded unusual values .However, our predicted model will be very easy and earnestly produced accurate absolute values of minimum rain fall even we substituted larger group of parameters with highest credibility and accuracy.The variance (σ2) of the model was considered with weighted parameters
for standardization of data sets because due to floods , cyclonic hit and climatic weather parameter variation. All observations are normally distributed with mean μ and common variance
i.e. We presumed that; all observed values have followed the Gaussianity with weighted values (Weighted logistic regression)
. Our predictive run-off errors were produced the best likelihood estimation, it was reduced
up to 95% (R2=0.93, Negenkal R square value was 108.8). The present forecasted compartment -model can able to yield good approximate values, even if the data series will follow the heterology distribution. Model iteration has restored at the 100pecent protection @ the time of reproducibility. In the relative comparison of RF (Dharwad district ), the maximum distribution of RF was seen in different Progressive months between June (maximum) followed by July (23%) , September (16%) and October (16%) respectively. The results of the predictive rainfall model identified the best fit which has extrapolated various patterns for unobserved components different with larger number of traits (using run off model). The data showed that, the annual maximum daily rainfall will be received @ any specified range between 23.14 mm (minimum) to 83.44 mm (maximum) indicated at large account of fluctuations were seen in the month of Jun and July and also we observed that, maximum rainfall can received with mean temperature (32-33oC) with moderate precipitation. Log-normal distribution was the best fit probability distribution for majority of the study periods. This model will help us to explore the newer ideas about the prediction of annual maximum daily rainfall to design with small and medium hydraulic pressure. Indirectly we will quantify the soil and water conservation structures, irrigation, drainage works, vegetative waterways and field diversions in the farmers’ field.
Future line of work can be the current model, though focused on Dharwad district, can be extended to other agro-climatic zones in India to generalize the model's applicability. Coupling the predictive models with real-time meteorological data feeds and satellite observations can improve forecasting capabilities. Linking the rainfall prediction model with crop simulation software (e.g., DSSAT, APSIM) can help in optimizing sowing dates and irrigation schedules.
Beven, K. J. and Freer. J. .E. (2001). Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation inmechanistic modeling of Complex environmental systems using the GLUE Method. J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29.
Erich, J. Plate (2015). Uncertainty Analysis of Multi-Model Flood Forecasts. Water, 7(12), 6788-6809.
Manikandan, M., Thiyagarajan, G. and Vijaya Kumar, G. (2011). Probability analysis for estimating annual one day maximum rainfall in Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. J. Madras Agric., 98(1-3), 69-73.
Nassif, W. G., Al-Taai, O. T., Mohammed, A. J. and AL-Shamarti, H. K. (2021). Estimate probability distribution of monthly maximum daily rainfall of Iraq J. Phy. Conf. Ser., 5(3), 1804-1813.