Author:
Nilesh Ninama1*, Karan Vir Singh2, I.S. Naruka3 and Hemant Kumar Meena1
Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(9): 73-76, 2025
Address:
1Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Horticulture, R.V.S.K.V.V., Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh), India.
2Senior Scientist, Department of Horticulture, R.V.S.K.V.V., Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh), India.
3Professor, Department of Horticulture, R.V.S.K.V.V., Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh), India.
(Corresponding author: Nilesh Ninama*)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.9.12
Onion (Allium cepa L.), often referred to as the "queen of the kitchen," is among the oldest and most economically significant bulbous vegetable crops, cultivated extensively across the world (Havey, 2018). Its importance stems not only from its universal use as a culinary ingredient but also from its contribution to the global economy through large-scale domestic consumption and international trade. The distinct pungency of onion arises from the volatile compound allyl-propyl disulphide, which not only enriches flavor but also exhibits notable therapeutic properties (Shamyuktha et al., 2020).
India is recognized as one of the leading onion-producing countries, accounting for nearly 28-30% of global production. The crop currently occupies about 1.74 million hectares, yielding more than 30.21 million metric tonnes annually, with an average productivity of 1.73 tonnes per hectare (Anonymous, 2023). Within India, Madhya Pradesh after Maharashtra represents a major onion-producing state, where cultivation extends over approximately 213.75 thousand hectares, producing nearly 5.26 million metric tonnes per year (Anonymous, 2023). Notably, in the Gird region, comprising Gwalior, Morena, Bhind, Sheopur and Shivpuri districts, serves as an important onion-growing belt during the rabi season. This zone is characterized by semi-arid, sub-tropical conditions, typified by extreme summer heat, cold winters, irregular precipitation and loamy to alluvial soils of moderate fertility-factors that collectively create favorable conditions for onion cultivation.
Despite its economic prominence, onion production is constrained by several challenges, ranging from abiotic stresses such as water scarcity and nutrient imbalances to severe biotic pressures. Among the latter, foliar, bulb, and root diseases are particularly damaging, often reducing both yield and post-harvest storability (Cramer, 2000). Of these, purple blotch (PLB) caused by Alternaria porri (Ellis) Cif., is regarded as one of the most devastating foliar diseases worldwide.
The significance of purple blotch disease lies in its profound impact on crop productivity. The pathogen infects plants during both vegetative and bulb development stages, producing necrotic lesions that restrict functional leaf area, diminish photosynthetic efficiency, and substantially reduce yield potential. Under conducive conditions, yield losses typically range between 40-60%, though complete crop failure has been reported in both seed and bulb production systems, depending on environmental factors and disease intensity (Cramer, 2000; Karar et al., 2014; Osman et al., 2024).
The disease is particularly favored by warm and humid climates, where it manifests as oval to elliptical, sunken, concentric lesions on leaves and scapes that progressively enlarge and coalesce, resulting in blighting (Suheri and Price 2000a and b). Severe epidemics cause premature leaf senescence, undersized and shriveled bulbs, and poor storage quality, posing a significant threat to both farm-level profitability and the stability of onion supply chains.
The field experiment was conducted during the rabi seasons of 2023–24 at the Research Farm, College of Agriculture, RVSKVV, Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh). In this study thirty-five onion genotypes were Bhima Shubhra, Bhima Red, Bhima Raj, Bhima Shweta, Bhima Shakti, Bhima Super, Bhima Kiran, Bhima Safed, Bhima Dark Red, Bhima Light Red, Arka Pragati, Arka Kalyan, N – 53, N – 2-4-1, 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772, 1773, 1774, 1783, W-043, W-085, W-125, W-344, W-355, W-361, W-401, W-500, W-504, W-507, GL – 1, GL – 2 and GL – 3 Selected. Forty-five-day-old healthy and uniform onion seedlings, each having three to four true leaves, were selected for transplanting. Crop was transplanted on first week of November 2023-24 with plot size of 2.0 X 1.5 m and replicated three times with spacing of 15 cm between rows and 10 cm between plants. Five plants were selected randomly in each plot for observations.
Incidence of diseases
The observation on disease incidence will be recorded using 0-5 scale (Table 1) at seven days intervals (when the disease development is at maximum extent).
Table 1: Scale adopted for scoring of purple blotch diseases in onion.
Score | Disease Symptom |
0 | No disease symptom. |
1 | A few spots towards tip covering 10 percent leaf area. |
2 | Several purplish brown patches covering up to 20 percent of leaf area. |
3 | Several patches with paler outer zone covering up to 40 percent leaf area. |
4 | Leaf streaks covering up to 75 percent leaf area or breaking of the leaves from center |
5 | Complete drying of the leaves or breaking of leaves from the center. |
Source rating scale, as per Sharam et al. (1986).
Percentage disease index (PDI) will be calculated by using the formula given by (Wheeler, 1969).
The genotypes were graded as per rating scale followed by Sharma et al. (1986). The level of resistance and/or susceptibility of each line was determined by using 0-5 rating scale (Table 2).
Table 2: 0-5 scale adapted to indicate degree of resistance against diseases of onion.
Score | PDI (%) | Category | Disease Reaction |
0 | < 5 % | 0 | Immune or Free (F) |
1 | 5 -10 | I | Resistant (R) |
2 | 10-20 | II | Moderately resistant (MR) |
3 | 21-40 | III | Moderately susceptible (MS) |
4 | 41-60 | IV | Susceptible (S) |
5 | >61 | V | Highly Susceptible (HS) |
The evaluation of thirty-five onion genotypes for their reaction to purple blotch disease revealed considerable variation, enable their classification into different categories. None of the genotype was found in immune and resistant categories, six genotypes were found in moderately resistant category with disease incidence ranging from 12.80 to 20.73%. Sixteen genotypes were grouped as moderately susceptible, showed disease incidence between 22.33 and 40.73%. Twelve genotypes fell into the susceptible category, with incidence ranging from 43.00 to 56.67%, while only one genotype was classified as highly susceptible with disease incidence above 60% (Table 3 and 4).
Genotypes Arka Kalyan (12.80 %), 1783 (13.73 %), 1774 (17.87 %), Bhima Red (19.47 %), Bhima Kiran (20.20 %) and Bhima Shakti (20.73 %) consistently recorded the lowest incidence (Table 3). These findings are in line with Shilpakumari et al. (2011), who identified several genotypes within the moderately resistant range (11–20 %), and with Kavitha et al. (2017), who also categorized Arka Kalyan as moderately resistant. Bal et al. (2019a) placed Bhima Red and Bhima Shakti in this group, while Muthaiah et al. (2021) reported Bhima Red (14.67) as moderately resistant.
Sixteen genotypes, including 1772 (22.33 %), Bhima Light Red (23.07 %), 1773 (23.40 %), Arka Pragati (24.13 %), Bhima Super (26.13 %), W-125 (29.53 %), Bhima Safed (30.07 %), 1769 (30.67 %), GL-2 (33.13 %), N-2-4-1 (33.47 %), N-53 (36.73 %), GL-1 (37.27 %), 1771 (37.40 %), 1770 (39.60 %), Bhima Shweta (40.07 %) and W-344 (40.73 %) were classified as moderately susceptible (Table 3). These results correspond with Shilpakumari et al. (2011), who reported 132 genotypes in this category (21–40 %). Kavitha et al. (2017) also reported Arka Pragati as moderately susceptible, corroborated the present findings. Bal et al. (2019a) identified 10 genotypes in this group, further validated this classification.
Twelve genotypes fell into the susceptible group, with purple blotch incidence values from 43.00 to 56.67 %. Genotypes Bhima Shubhra (43.00 %), W-355 (43.47 %), GL-3 (43.93 %), Bhima Dark Red (44.00 %), Bhima Raj (46.07 %), W-504 (46.20 %), 1768 (49.53 %), W-085 (49.60 %), W-043 (50.07 %), W-401 (50.07 %), W-361 (54.60 %) and W-500 (56.67 %) were categorized as susceptible (Table 3).
Table 3: Screening of different genotypes of onion against purple blotch disease.
Genotypes | Mean and PDI (%) | Category | Reaction | |
G1 | Bhima Shubhra | 2.15(43.00) | IV | S |
G2 | Bhima Red | 0.97(19.47) | II | MR |
G3 | Bhima Raj | 2.30(46.07) | IV | S |
G4 | Bhima Shweta | 2.00(40.07) | III | MS |
G5 | Bhima Shakti | 1.04(20.73) | II | MR |
G6 | Bhima Super | 1.31(26.13) | III | MS |
G7 | Bhima Kiran | 1.01(20.20) | II | MR |
G8 | Bhima Safed | 1.50(30.07) | III | MS |
G9 | Bhima Dark Red | 2.20(44.00) | IV | S |
G10 | Bhima Light Red | 1.15(23.07) | III | MS |
G11 | Arka Pragati | 1.21(24.13) | III | MS |
G12 | Arka Kalyan | 0.64(12.80) | II | MR |
G13 | N – 53 | 1.84(36.73) | III | MS |
G14 | N – 2-4-1 | 1.67(33.47) | III | MS |
G15 | 1768 | 2.48(49.53) | IV | S |
G16 | 1769 | 1.53(30.67) | III | MS |
G17 | 1770 | 1.98(39.60) | III | MS |
G18 | 1771 | 1.87(37.40) | III | MS |
G19 | 1772 | 1.12(22.33) | III | MS |
G20 | 1773 | 1.17(23.40) | III | MS |
G21 | 1774 | 0.89(17.87) | II | MR |
G22 | 1783 | 0.69(13.73) | II | MR |
G23 | W-043 | 2.50(50.07) | IV | S |
G24 | W-085 | 2.48(49.60) | IV | S |
G25 | W-125 | 1.48(29.53) | III | MS |
G26 | W-344 | 2.04(40.73) | III | MS |
G27 | W-355 | 2.17(43.47) | IV | S |
G28 | W-361 | 2.73(54.60) | IV | S |
G29 | W-401 | 2.50(50.07) | IV | S |
G30 | W-500 | 2.83(56.67) | IV | S |
G31 | W-504 | 2.31(46.20) | IV | S |
G32 | W-507 | 3.20(63.93) | V | HS |
G33 | GL – 1 | 1.86(37.27) | III | MS |
G34 | GL – 2 | 1.66(33.13) | III | MS |
G35 | GL – 3 | 2.20(43.93) | IV | S |
S. Em(+) | 1.22 | |||
CD (5%) | 3.49 | |||
Table 4: Grouping of different genotypes against purple blotch disease response.
Disease Reaction | No. of genotypes | Genotypes |
Immune | 0 | - |
Resistance | 0 | - |
Moderate Resistance | 6 | Arka Kalyan, 1783, 1774, Bhima Red, Bhima Kiran and Bhima Shakti |
Moderate Susceptible | 16 | 1772, Bhima Light Red, 1773, Arka Pragati, Bhima Super, W-125, Bhima Safed, 1769, GL – 2, N – 2-4-1, N – 53, GL – 1, 1771, 1770, Bhima Shweta and W-344 |
Susceptible | 12 | Bhima Shubhra, W-355, GL – 3, Bhima Raj, Bhima Dark Red, Bhima Raj, W-504, 1768, W-085, W-401, W-043, W-361, W-500 |
Highly Susceptible | 1 | W-507 |
Kavitha et al. (2017) categorized Arka Niketan, Arka Bhima, and Bhima Super as susceptible, while Bal et al. (2019a) reported Bhima Raj and Bhima Dark Red in the same group. Chauhan et al. (2023) also recorded 20 susceptible genotypes with disease severity up to 70 %.
Genotype W-507 was identified as highly susceptible, with incidence values of 63.93 % (Table 3). This observation is consistent with Shilpakumari et al. (2011), who reported 54 genotypes in the highly susceptible group (>61 percent). Muthaiah et al. (2021) documented four genotypes with severity levels up to 80 %, while Chauhan et al. (2023) reported 10 highly susceptible genotypes exceeding 70 % severity.
The variation in disease incidence across genotypes may be attributed to differences in genetic makeup, biochemical defence mechanisms and environmental influences. Muthaiah et al. (2021) emphasized that none of the genotypes screened were immune, with resistance being only partial in nature. Environmental conditions also play a crucial role in disease expression: Sonawane et al. (2022) and Anjali et al. (2023) noted seasonal fluctuations, while Osman et al. (2024) reported greater severity under rainy conditions compared with irrigated environments.
Moderately resistant onion genotypes identified in this study serve as important sources of resistance for future breeding programs. Their strategic use can lead to the development of improved varieties that combine resistance with higher productivity and longer storage life, particularly for regions prone to heavy pest and disease incidence. For farmers, the adoption of these varieties can help reduce yield losses, minimize dependence on chemical control, and ensure more sustainable onion production under local field conditions.
Anjali, V. A., Basavarajappa, M. P., Hubballi, M., Gunnaiah, R., Mesta, R. K., Venkateshalu, and Raut, N. B. (2023). Survey for the incidence of soft rot of onion: An emerging disease in Northern parts of Karnataka. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12(11, Suppl.), 2132–2136.
Anonymous. (2023). Agriculture statistics at a glance-2021.Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi, India, pp. 185 and 187.
Bal, S., Maity, T. K., Sharangi, A. B., and Maji, A. (2019a). Screening of onion (Allium cepa L.) germplasm against purple blotch disease. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(6), 546–548.
Chauhan, S. S. A., Islam, S., Prasad, L., Singh, S., Ellur, R. K., and Tomar, B. S. (2023). Screening of onion (Allium cepa) genotypes to find out novel resistant source against purple blotch (Alternaria porri). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93(11), 1208–1213.
Cramer, C. S. (2000). Breeding and genetics of Fusarium basal rot resistance in onion. Euphytica, 115(3), 159–166.
Havey, M. J. (2018). Onion breeding. In I. Goldman (Ed.), Plant breeding reviews, 42, pp. 1–36.
Karar, H., Abbas, G., Hameed, A., Ahmad, G., and Ali, A. (2014). Losses in onion (Allium cepa) due to onion thrips (Thrips tabaci) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and effect of weather factors on population dynamics of thrips. World Applied Sciences Journal, 32(11), 2250–2258.
Kavitha, S., Veeraghanti, B., Gangadhara Naik, and Hegde, K. T. (2017). Screening of onion genotypes against purple blotch. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience, 5(1), 221–223.
Muthaiah, K., Pitchaimuthu, Pandav, A. K., S, Sriram, K., Padmini, K., and Usharani, T. R. (2021). Identification of elite genotypes of onion against purple blotch disease. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 9(2), 966–970.
Osman, A., Abdulaia, M., Laminib, S., and Santo, K. G. (2024). Demographic characteristics, incidence, and severity of onion basal rot in the Upper East Region of Ghana. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 10(1), 1–14.
Shamyuktha, J., Sheela, J., Rajinimala, N., Jeberlinprabina, B., and Ravindran, C. (2020). Survey on onion basal rot disease incidence and evaluation of Aggregatum onion (Allium cepa L. var. Aggregatum Don.) genotypes against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cepae. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(7), 529–536.
Sharma, S. R. (1986). Effect of fungicides on purple blotch and bulb yield of onion. Indian Phytopathology, 39(1), 78–82.
Shilpakumari, M. V., Pramodh, H. P., Gowda, R. V., Balol, G. B., Divya, B. L., and Narendrappa, T. (2011). Evaluation of onion genotypes for disease resistance to purple blotch under field conditions. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(4), 964–966.
Sonawane, R. B., Birade, R. M., Patil, H. M., and Dhemre, J. K. (2022). Survey, occurrence of major onion diseases and management of Twister disease of onion (Allium cepa L.). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 12(11), 3676–3682.
Suheri, H., and Price, T. V. (2000a). Infection by Alternaria porri and Stemphylium vesicarium on onion leaves and disease development under controlled environments. Plant Pathology, 49(3), 377–384.
Suheri, H., and Price, T. V. (2000b). Stemphylium leaf blight of garlic (Allium sativum) in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology, 29(3), 192–199.
Nilesh Ninama, Karan Vir Singh, I.S. Naruka and Hemant Kumar Meena (2025). Response of Onion (Allium cepa L.) Genotypes to Purple Blotch (Alternaria porri) Disease under Gird Region of Madhya Pradesh. Biological Forum, 17(9): 73-76.