Seasonal Incidence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on Chickpea in Relation to Abiotic Factors Semi-arid Region of Rajasthan

Author:

Rajkumar Bajya1*, D.K. Bairwa2, B.L. Jat3, J.K. Bana2, Akhter Hussain3, S.L. Sharma2, Laxman Singh Saini1, D.R. Bajya2 and Suman Choudhary2

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 17(1): 64-68, 2025

Address:

1Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Entomology, SKNAU, Jobner Jaipur (Rajasthan), India.

2Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology, SKNAU, Jobner, Jaipur (Rajasthan), India.

3Professor, Department of Entomology, SKNAU, Jobner, Jaipur (Rajasthan), India.

(Corresponding author: Rajkumar Bajya*rajbajya5960@gmail.com)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.1.9

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

The investigation on "Seasonal incidence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea in relation to abiotic factors semi-arid region of Rajasthan" were conducted at Agronomy Farm, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner, Rajasthan during two consecutive season i.e. Rabi, 2022-23 and 2023-24. During the investigation the incidence of gram pod borer, H. armigera in chickpea crop started from first and second week of December and reached to peak at second to third week of February, respectively during both year of study. The larval population of H. armigera had significant positive correlation with maximum and minimum temperatures and significant negative correlation with morning relative humidity.

Keywords

Chickpea, seasonal abundance, H. armigera, correlation, abiotic factors

Introduction

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) commonly known as Bengal gram, gram or Chana belongs to Leguminosae family. Globally, chickpea as the third most important pulse crop in term of production, following the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and field pea (Pisum sativum L.) (Jukanti et al., 2012). India accounts for 75 per cent of the world chickpea production and consumption (Das et al., 2017). Chickpea is a rich source of carbohydrates (60.7%), protein (21.5%), fat (6.0%) and contains essential nutrients such as niacin (B3), riboflavin (B2), pantothenic acid (B5) and vitamin C (Ahlawat and Om Prakash 1996; Jukanti et al., 2012). Additionally, chickpea contains significantly higher levels of calcium and phosphorus compared to other legumes. In India, chickpea is cultivated over an area of 10.91 million hectares with an annual production of 13.75 million tonnes and a productivity of 1260 kg/hectare (Anonymous, 2022a). The major chickpea growing states are Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Jharkhand, contributing over 95% of the total production. In Rajasthan, chickpea is cultivated on 2.25 million hectares area, produced 2.65 million tonnes annually with productivity of 1177 kg/hectare (Anonymous, 2022b). Major chickpea growing districts in Rajasthan includes Kota, Sriganganagar, Chittorgarh, Alwar, Tonk, Jhalawar, Pali, Jaipur, Sawai Madhopur, Bikaner, Churu, Sikar and Hanumangarh contributing approximately 14 per cent of the total production. Despite its significance, the per availability of pulses is only 52.9 grams per capita per day or 19.3 kg per capita per year (Anonymous, 2017), far below the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) recommended daily requirement of 104 grams (Anonymous, 2010). This shortfall is primarily due to various production constraints, including abiotic and biotic factors. 

Material & Methods

To study the seasonal incidence of H. armigera on chickpea, the variety RSG-902 was sown on 28th October during Rabi 2022-23 and on 1st November during Rabi 2023-24 five plots of 2.4 × 2.0 m2 size keeping row to row and plant to plant distance of 30 cm and 10 cm, respectively. All the recommended practices for raising the crop will be followed except for plant protection measures.

For this purpose the crop was left for natural infestation. The larval population of pod borer was recorded at weekly interval on one-meter row length at five spots selected randomly in each plot from the first appearance till harvesting of the crop in the early morning hours without disturbing the flora and fauna.  The data recorded on larval population and meteorological parameters used for statistical analysis.

The simple correlation computed between the larval population of gram pod borer and weather parameters, viz., maximum and minimum temperatures, relative humidity and rainfall, as per Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation formula (Steel and Torry 1980).

Where,  

rxy = Simple correlation coefficient  

x = Variable, i.e. abiotic component.  

(Maximum temperature, minimum temperature, relative humidity and total rainfall)  

 y = Variable, i.e. mean number of insect pests 

 n = Number of observations. 

Results & Discussion

The data recorded on larval population of gram pod borer, H. armigera in chickpea crop during Rabi, 2022-23 and 2023-24 have been presented in Table 1 & 2 and Fig. 1 & 2. The study of Seasonal incidence of Helicoverpa armigera and their correlation with abiotic factors is help to know the most susceptible stage of pests which, suitable control measures should be adopted to manage the pests. Further the study is also helpful to minimize the population of regular pests through changing the cropping pattern.

In the present investigation the incidence of larval population of gram pod borer, H. armigera in chickpea crop was commenced from the first and second week of December i.e. 50th and 49th SMW, which gradually increased and reached to peak (6.52 & 7.32 larvae/MRL) in the third week of February (8th SMW) and second week of February (7th SMW) in Rabi, 2022-23 & 2023-24 respectively.

The present study are conformity with that of Choudhary et al. (2024) conducted the population dynamics of H. armigera on chickpea. The incidence commenced from first and second week of December i.e. 49th and 50th SMW. Which, increased gradually and reached peak (6.4 and 5.2 larvae/ m row) in the third and second week of February (8th and 9th SMW).

Lal et al. (2013) noticed two peaks of the larval population of gram pod borer, (H. armigera) on chickpea. First peak during 49th meteorological week (SMW) with a maximum of 1.73 and 2.13 larvae per meter row length and second peak with 8.93 and 7.93 larvae per meter row during 8th and 9th SMW in 2003-04 and 2004-05, respectively which decreased sharply with maturity of the crop. 

Likewise, Awasthi et al. (2003); Chatar et al. (2010); Shinde et al. (2013); Patel et al. (2015); Patidar et al. (2020); Bajya et al. (2022); Yadav et al. (2024); Kumawat et al. (2024) reported the incidence of H. armigera throughout the crop growth stages. The population appeared from second fortnight of November being minimum in second fortnight of December to first fortnight of January and peak during second fortnight of February to first fortnight of April depending on the climatic conditions.

The correlation studies revealed that the larval population had positive significant correlation with maximum and minimum temperatures (r = 0.528 and 0.572; p<.05) while, non-significant negative correlation with morning and evening relative humidity (r = -0.278: p<.05, r = -0.314; p<.05) and non-significant positive correlation with rainfall during Rabi, 2022-23. Likewise, the population of H. armigera had significant positive correlation with maximum and minimum temperatures (r = 0.539 and 0.562; p<.05) and significant negative correlation with morning (r = -0.578; p<.05) relative humidity while, non-significant negative correlation with evening relative humidity and non-significant positive correlation with rainfall during Rabi, 2023-24.

The multiple linear regression analysis explained 41.0 and 59.0 percent variation in H. armigera population due to combined contribution of abiotic factors during Rabi, 2022-23 and 2023-24, respectively. The step wise regression analysis explained 29.0 per cent significant variation in H. armigera population due to maximum temperature during Rabi, 2022-23 and 28.0 per cent significant variation in H. armigera population due to evening relative humidity during Rabi, 2023-24. 

The present findings are conformity with that of Pandey et al. (2012) the larval population showed a significant positive correlation with minimum and maximum temperature (r = 0.621 and r = 0.643). In contrast, morning relative humidity exhibited a strong negative correlation (r = -0.760).

Shinde et al. (2013) reported positive correlation with both minimum and maximum temperatures and negative correlation with morning fully support the finding. Singh and Ali (2006); Yadav and Jat (2009); Malik et al. (2015) reported positive correlation of larval population with both maximum and minimum temperatures. Bajya et al. (2010); Meena and Bhatia (2014) reported positive correlation of larval population H. armigera with relative humidity. 

Fig. 1. Seasonal incidence of H. armigera  on chickpea in relation to abiotic factors during Rabi, 2022-23.

Table 1 : Seasonal incidence of H. armigera  on chickpea in relation to abiotic factors during Rabi, 2022-23.

Sr. No.

SMW#

Date of 

observation

Temperature (°C)

Relative humidity (%)

Rainfall  (mm)

Larval population/MRL**

Max.

Min.

Mor.

Eve.

2022-23

1.

48

26.11.2023

27.9

4.80

66

32.0

00.0

0.00

2.

49

03.12.2023

25.5

3.70

75

36.0

00.0

0.00

3.

50

10.12.2023

26.5

4.60

77

33.0

00.0

0.32

4.

51

17.12.2023

25.5

4.60

79

37.0

00.0

0.52

5.

52

24.12.2023

23.3

2.20

79

30.0

00.0

0.00

6.

1

01.01.2024

20.7

-1.00

82

40.0

00.0

0.00

7.

2

08.01.2024

24.5

4.90

76

35.0

00.0

0.00

8.

3

15.01.2024

20.1

-0.50

77

33.0

00.0

1.68

9.

4

22.01.2024

21.3

3.60

80

42.0

00.0

1.92

10.

5

29.01.2024

22.0

5.20

83

54.0

00.0

2.96

11.

6

05.02.2024

26.9

6.90

82

31.0

17.0

3.56

12.

7

12.02.2024

28.4

5.80

74

26.0

00.0

4.40

13.

8

19.02.2024

31.9

9.80

68

28.0

00.0

6.52

14.

9

26.02.2024

32.1

12.0

70

25.0

00.0

4.72

15.

10

05.03.2024

30.7

11.3

78

28.0

3.00

2.56

16.

11

19.03.2024

32.8

13.8

80

32.0

1.50

1.92

#SMW – Standard Meteorological Weeks;    **MRL- meter row length

Table 2 : Seasonal incidence of H. armigera  on chickpea in relation to abiotic factors during Rabi 2023-24.

Sr. No.

SMW#

Date of 

observation

Temperature (°C)

Relative humidity (%)

Rainfall  (mm)

Larval population/MRL**

Max.

Min.

Mor.

Eve.

2023-24

1.

48

26.11.2023

24.5

10.7

78.0

51.0

01.0

0.00

2.

49

03.12.2023

25.3

7.30

77.0

44.0

00.0

0.08

3.

50

10.12.2023

26.6

5.30

77.0

35.0

00.0

0.12

4.

51

17.12.2023

25.0

5.50

69.0

34.0

00.0

0.20

5.

52

24.12.2023

24.0

4.90

79.0

42.0

00.0

0.00

6.

1

01.01.2024

20.0

3.50

79.0

58.0

00.0

0.00

7.

2

08.01.2024

21.9

3.30

76.0

37.0

00.0

0.00

8.

3

15.01.2024

23.2

4.80

75.0

35.0

00.0

1.24

9.

4

22.01.2024

24.0

4.30

73.0

32.0

00.0

1.56

10.

5

29.01.2024

26.0

11.1

79.0

35.0

02.0

2.36

11.

6

05.02.2024

22.9

7.60

73.0

33.0

02.4

3.88

12.

7

12.02.2024

26.6

7.20

72.0

29.0

00.0

7.32

13.

8

19.02.2024

29.0

10.4

73.0

34.0

00.0

6.40

14.

9

26.02.2024

27.4

11.6

70.0

42.0

00.0

5.60

15.

10

05.03.2024

29.3

9.90

70.0

52.0

00.0

3.92

16.

11

19.03.2024

30.6

7.60

74.0

29.0

00.0

2.32

#SMW – Standard Meteorological Meeks;   **MRL- meter row length

Fig. 2. Seasonal incidence of H. armigera  on chickpea in relation to abiotic factors during Rabi 2023-24.

Table 3: Correlation coefficient between larval population of H. armigera   on chickpea in relation to abiotic factors during Rabi, 2022-23 and 2023-24.

Larval population

Temperature (°C)

Relative humidity (%)

Rainfall  (mm)


Max.

Min.

Mor.

Eve.

2022-23

0.528*

0.572*

-0.278

-0.314

0.225

2023-24

0.539*

0.562*

-0.578*

-0.328

0.076

* Significant at 5 per cent of significance 

Table 4:  Multiple regression models developed for larval population of H.armigera on chickpea during Rabi, 2022-23 and 2023-24.

Multiple linear regression equation

(Y= a + b1X1 + b2X2 + b3X3 + b4X4 + b5X5)

R2 value

2022-23

2023-24

2022-23

2023-24

Y= 21.92a + (-0.36) Tmax + (0.51) Tmin + (-0.16) RHmor + (-0.02) RHevn + (0.11) Rf


Y= 26.78a + (-0.18) Tmax + (0.63) Tmin + (-0.26) RHmor + (-0.10) RHevn + (-0.61) Rf

0.411

0.598

          a = constant

Table 5: Step wise regression models developed for larval population of H. armigera on chickpea during Rabi, 22-2023 and 23-2024.

Step wise regression equation

(Y= a +bX)

R2 value

2022-23

2023-24

2022-23

2023-24

Y= 0.746a + (0.225) Tmax

Y= 27.10a + (-0.334) RHmor

0.296

0.280

Conclusion

The incidence of gram pod borer, H. armigera in chickpea study in early December, peaked in mid February. Significant positive correlations were observed between larval population and maximum and minimum temperatures and significant negative correlations were found with morning relative humidity.

Future Scope

The findings of the current investigation on the seasonal occurrence of Helicoverpa armigera can significantly contribute to the development of targeted pest control strategies. By pinpointing the most vulnerable stages of these pests, it becomes possible to minimize the reliance on chemical pesticides. This approach helps create a safer environment that supports the growth of natural predators. Reducing pesticide use not only aids in the conservation of biological control agents but also enhances the effectiveness of natural pest management, particularly in controlling the larval populations of H. armigera.

References

Ahlawat, I. P. S. and Prakash, O. M. (1996). Nutritional value of chickpea grains. Principles of agronomy and crops, pp. 43.

Anonymous (2010). Project coordinator’s report of all India Coordinated Research Project on MULLaRP. IIPR, Kanpur, pp. 11.

Anonymous (2017). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, 2016.

Anonymous (2022a). Agriculture Statistics. Reports of Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Government of India, pp. 04. 

Anonymous (2022b). Agricultural statistics at a glance 2018. Directorate of economics and statistics, Department of agriculture, co-operation and farmers welfare, ministry of agriculture and farmers welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

Awasthi, A. K., Tiwari, R. B., Thakur, B. S., Shrivastava, D. K. and Chaure, N. K. (2003). Seasonal incidence of pod borer, H. armigera (Hub.) and yield losses in chickpea crop. Journal of Entomological Research, 19, 249-253.

Bajya, D. R., Monga, D., Tyagi, M. P. and Meena, B. L. (2010). Population dynamics of Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea, pigeon pea and cotton in correlation with weather parameters. Annals of Plant Protection Science, 18, 223-282.

Bajya, R., Patel, Y., Garg, V. K. and Kumar, N. (2022). Effect of Weather Factors on Population Dynamics of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) in Chickpea. Biological Forum - An International Journal, 14(4a), 242-245.

Chatar, V. P., Raghvani, K. L., Joshi, M. D., Ghadge, S. M., Deshmukh, S. G. and Dalave, S. K. (2010). Population dynamics of pod borer, H. armigera (Hub.) infesting chickpea. International Journal of Plant Protection, 3(1), 65-67.

Choudhary, S., Deshwal, H. L. and Bana, J. K. (2024). Population dynamics of pod borer H. armigera on chickpea. Indian Journal of Entomology, 10, 55446.

Das, A., Datta, S., Thakur, S., Shukla, A., Chaturvedi, S. K., Kumar, P. A. and Singh, N. P. (2017). Expression of a chimeric gene encoding insecticidal crystal protein Cry1A abc of Bacillus thuringiensis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) confers resistance to gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hub.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1423.

Jukanti, A. K., Gaur, P. M., Gowda, C. L. L. and Chibbar, R. N. (2012). Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. British Journal of Nutrition, 108, S11-S26.

Kumawat, S., Sharma, S. Kumari, H., Naga, B. L., Meena, R. K., Meena, S. K. and Arvind (2024). Population dynamics of H. armigera (Hubner) in chickpea. Indian Journal of Entomology, 10, 55446

Lal, M., Singh, S. V., Singh, D. and Pal, B. N. (2013). Population fluctuations of H. armigera (Hub.) and Campoletis chlorideae and their relationship on chickpea. Agriculture Sciences Digest, 33(1), 77-79.

Malik, R., Kumar, R., Prasad, C. S. and Rana, R. (2015). Seasonal dynamics of H. armigera (Hub.) on chickpea and relative abundance of larval parasitoid Campoletis chlorideae in correlation with weather parameters. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Advanced, 1, 1-6.

Meena, B. S. and Bhatia, K. N. (2014). Effect of weather parameters on population dynamics of gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) in North West Plain Zone of Rajasthan. Journal of Agrometeorology, 16(2), 233-235.

Pandey, B. M., Tripathi, M. K. and Vijaylakshmi (2012). Seasonal incidence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on chickpea. Annals of Plant Protection Science, 22, 190-239.

Patel, S. R., Patel, K. G. and Ghetiya, L. V. (2015). Population dynamics of pod borer, H. armigera (Hub.) in relation to abiotic factors. An International e-Journal, 4(2), 163-170.

Patidar, D., Nayak, M. K., Jaiswal, S. K., Patel, K. and Patel, K. (2020). Seasonal variation of H. armigera (Hub.) population and their correlation with weather parameters under agro-climatic condition of Tikamgarh district, Madhya Pradesh. International Archive of Applied Sciences and Technology, 11, 53-56.

Shinde, Y. A., Veeda, O. P. and Patel, B. R. (2013). Observed the larval population of H. armigera (Hub.) during Rabi, 2009-10 and 2010-11. Current Biotica, 7(3), 222-227.

Singh, R. and Ali, S. (2006). Seasonal incidence of H. armigera (Hub.) and Campoletis chlorideae on chickpea. Annals of Plant Protection Science, 14(1), 234-235.

Steel, R. G. D. and Torry, J. H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics. Publication Mcgraw Hill Book Company, New York.

Yadav, S. K., Singha, D. R., Umraoa, R. S., Yadav, A. and Yadav, V., Yadav, G. (2024). Studies on seasonal incidence of gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hub.) on chickpea crop. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(3), 349-354. 

Yadav, S. R. and Jat, B L. (2009). Seasonal incidence of H. armigera (Hub.) on chickpea. Journal of Insect Science (Ludhiana), 22(3), 325-328.

How to cite this article

Rajkumar Bajya, D.K. Bairwa, B.L. Jat, J.K. Bana, Akhter Hussain, S.L. Sharma, Laxman Singh Saini, D.R. Bajya and Suman Choudhary (2025). Seasonal Incidence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on Chickpea in Relation to Abiotic Factors Semi-arid Region of Rajasthan. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 17(1): 64-68.