Studies on Moth Distribution (Insecta: Lepdioptera: Heterocera) in Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary Mandsaur and Neemach Districts of Madhya Pradesh, Central India

Author:

Sanjay Paunikar* and  Akhil Nair

Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(2): 42-50, 2025

Address:

Zoological Survey of India, Central Zone Regional Centre, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh), India.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.2.8

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Moths are lepidopteron insect primarily nocturnal, potentially bio-indicators, decomposer, prey forestry and agricultural pests, and night time pollinators. For the moth diversity in the Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary, Mandsaur and Neemach districts of Madhya Pradesh the current study will be the first to report on species diversity, species composition, and abundance. In the year 2022 to 2024, a comprehensive survey was carried out in the forest areas of Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary and its environs from March to December. In the course of the investigation, we identified 148 species, 121 genera, 44 subfamilies and 17 families under 10 superfamilies from the study area. The family Erebidae 49 species was dominant, followed by Crambidae 28 species, Geometridae 23 species, Noctuidae 15 species, Sphingidae 8 species, Notodontidae 5, Limacodidae 4 species, Nolidae and Saturniidae 3 species each, Euteliidae and Lasicocampidae 2 species each. The other families are Bombycidae, Hybaleidae, Eupterotidae, Pterophoridae and Thyrididae one species each were the least recorded families. The study revealed that there were noteworthy variations found in the moth faunal diversity in the Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary Madhya Pradesh.

Keywords

Lepidoptera, Moths, Nocturnal, Pests, Pollinator, Diversity, Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary.

Introduction

Madhya Pradesh is the Central Indian state and home to some of the unique and richest biodiversity in the country, protected under different categories like national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, tiger reserves and biosphere reserves (Ramakrishna et al., 2006; Chandra, 2011). Among these, Gandhisagar Sanctuary wildlife is a famous and situated on the northern boundary of Mandsaur and Neemach districts in Madhya Pradesh, India. It is spread over an area of 368.62 km2 (142.32 sq mi) adjoining Rajasthan state in India. It was notified in 1974 and more area was added in 1983. The Chambal River passes through the sanctuary dividing it into two parts. The western part is in Nimach district and eastern part is in Mandsaur district. It is in the Khathiar-Gir dry deciduous forests ecoregion. This region is known a Nimar region which touches its border with Rajasthan thus more of less knows as dry region thus vegetation is also not so dry and we will find many rocky patches during safari drive. The forest of this sanctuary is part of Khathiar-Gir dry deciduous forest thus here we will find trees like Salai, Kardhai, Dhawda, Tendu, Palash etc.  It is part of World famous Chaturbhuj Nala rock shelters are also part of same Gandhisagar wildlife sanctuary. This sanctuary is spread over the area surrounding to Gandhi Sagar dam backwater. 

The order Lepidoptera is one of the most recognized and popular insect order which includes moths and butterflies. They are amongst four most species diverse orders along with Coleoptera, Diptera and Hymenoptera (Pathania et al., 2014). Moths account for 85% of the lepidopteran population, and the remaining 15 % are butterflies and skippers (Pathania, et al., 2009). Moths are characterized by drably colored scales on the body, epiphysis on the foreleg, different types of antennae, phytophagous and predominantly nocturnal nature (Srivastava, 2002; Chandra et al., 2013; Singh et al., 2017; Kathirvelu et al., 2019). They are very sensitive to climate changes and vegetation alterations, making them an important group for monitoring climate and habitat changes (Thomas, 2005; Lees and Zilli 2019). Moths and butterflies contribute to essential ecosystem processes such as pollination, herbivore and decomposition in many terrestrial biomes (Lewis, 2001; Lomov et al., 2006; Chandra et al., 2019; Paunikar et al., 2021). They are also considered vital for ecosystem services because of various roles such as forestry agricultural and other vegetable crops pests (Beeson, 1942; Browne, 1968; Joshi et al., 2004; Nair, 2007; Sharma et al., 2008; Paunikar and Sharma, 2022a), food for mammals andbirds (Vaughan, 1997; Wilson et al., 1999) and night pollinators (Macgregor et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2022a). Moths are strongly associated with vegetation structure and composition, which makes them a suitable indicator taxon for various ecological studies (Chandra et al., 2019; Singh et al., 2022a). Moth communities are receiving increasing conservation interest (Scalercio et al., 2009; Sondhi et al., 2018; Paunikar et al., 2023a), because of high sensitivity to the environmental change and proved to be powerful indicator of forest disturbance (Kitching et al., 2000; Summerville et al., 2004; Kendrick, 2009; Sondhi et al., 2016; Paunikar et al., 2023b). 

Recently, scientists estimated to Lepidoptera comprises 166, 320 described species belonging to 143 families in 43 superfamilies distributed globally, except for Antarctica. In India, Lepidoptera are known by 13,124 species in 3,668 genera, 101 families and 31 superfamilies. Of which, 1379 species are butterflies and the remaining 11,745 species are moths (Singh et al., 2024).

The various Lepidopterists have been carried out to investigate the moth diversity in different parts of the Madhya Pradesh, since eighteen century. The major works have been done by Cotes and Swinhoe (1886-89) in six volumes of "A Calalogue of Moths of India" included 120 species from Madhya Pradesh. Hampson (1892, 1894, 1895 and 1896) and Bell and Scott (1937) published in five volumes of "Fauna of British India" included 76 species from central India. Ramakrishna et al. (2006) documented moth fauna of National Parks of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Chandra and Nema (2007) compiled the moth diversity from Central India including Madhya Pradesh & Chhattisgarh includes 313 species/subspecies of moths belonging to 221 genera and 25 families. Chandra and Nema (2003, 2008); Chandra (2009); Chandra and Sambath (2016ab); Sambath, (2017; 2018a; 2018b; 2020, 2022); Sambath and Nair (2023); Paunikar et al. (2024) reported the moth diversity of different National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Tiger Reserves and Biosphere Reserves of Madhya Pradesh. Singh et al. (2022b) compiled the 226 species of moth from Madhya Pradesh.

In the present investigation we are concentrated on the lepidopteron- Moth species assemblage's in the forest areas of Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh state of Central India.


Material & Methods

Site Study. The study on moth diversity was carried out in Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary which is spread two districts, Mandsaur and Neemach belongs to Western Madhya Pradesh region. It is located at 24.670556 N, 75.788056 E. It is located in the rain shadow and therefore receives only around 400-500 mm of average rainfall in the monsoon. 

F:\Dr. Sanjay Paunikar, Scientist-E-2025\download.jpg

Source: Web-Map of Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary, Neemach and Mandsaur district of Madhya Pradesh.

Moth Specimen Collection and Observation by Light Trap Method. A mercury light trap method was used for the collection of moth. This is most common method of collecting nocturnal moths that hide or rest during the day in places where they are unlikely seen. Large number of moths caught at night using a light trap. White cloth screen (3 × 3.5) was hanging between two poles and extended forward over the ground slightly away from the direct source of mercury light placed.

Preservation and Identification of Specimens. The collected moth species were pinned, stretched and preserved in fumigated insect boxes. The photographic collection as well as preserved specimens from sites was identified with the help of identification key and available literature by Hampson (1892-1896), Bell and Scott (1937); Barlow (1982); Kirti and Singh (2015, 2016); Shubhalaxmi (2018); Kirti et al. (2019); Kalawate et al. (2024). Besides the above mentioned literature, a number of web resources including www.jpmoths.org; moths of India (http://www. mothsofindia.org/; Sondhi et al. (2024) were used for the purpose of identification.

Results & Discussion

The moth species identified belonging to 148 species, 121 genera, 44 subfamilies and 17 families under 10 superfamilies from the study area presented at Table 1, Fig. 1 & 2 with Plate. The family Erebidae 49 species (33.10%) was dominant, followed by Crambidae 28 species (18.91%), Geometridae 23 species (15.54%), Noctuidae 15 species (10.13%), Sphingidae 8 species (5.40%), Notodontidae 5 (3.37%), Limacodidae 4 species (2.70%), Nolidae and Saturniidae 3 species (2.02%), Euteliidae and Lasicocampidae 2 species each (1.35%), Furthermore, Bombycidae, Hybaleidae Eupterotidae, Pterophoridae and Thyrididae one species each (0.67%) respectively were the least recorded families. The maximum genera was found in family Erebidae 40 genera was a first runner, followed by Crambidae 25 genera, Geometridae 17 genera, Noctuidae 10 genera, Sphingidae 6 genera, Limcodidiae and Notodontidae 4 genera each, Saturniidae and Nolidae 3 genera each and Lasiocampidae 2 genera. The other families Bombycidae, Hybaleidae, Eupterotidae, Euteliidae and Thyrididae one genus each were the least recorded from the study area. The findings illustrate that the family Erebidae is widely distributed and abundant which corroborates the findings of Sambath and Nair (2023); Paunikar et al. (2024) who reported the dominance of Erebidae moths in the  Sanjay-Dubri national Park and Ratapani Wildlife Sanctuary of Madhya Pradesh. 

The highest abundance of the Erebidae family in the study is represented by the subfamily and Arctiinae (36.73%), Erebinae (32.65%) and Lymantrinae (18.36%) that constitutes the most species-rich subfamily of Erebidae. The second highest Crambidae family in the study is represented by the subfamily and Spilomelinae (50.00%) and Pyraustinae (25.00%) that constitutes the most species-rich subfamily of Crambidae. The Geometridae family is the third highest represented by subfamily Ennominae (56.52%), Sterrhinae (21.73%) and Geometrinae (17.39%) respectively and fourth highest species under Noctuidae family represented by subfamily Noctuiinae (53.33%). Their abundance can be explained by the occurrence of diverse habitats rich in forest tree, grasses and several crop plants preferred by the members by the species under the families Erebidae, Crambidae, Geometridae and Noctuidae. 

Table 1: Checklist MothFauna of Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary, Mandsaur and Neemach districts of Madhya Pradesh.

Sr. No.

Superfamily

Family

Subfamily

Species Name

Author, Year

1.

Bombycoidea

Eupteroidae

Eupterotinae

Eupterote undata

(Blanchard, 1844)

2.

Bombycoidea

Bombycidae

Bombycinae

Trilocha varians

(Walker, 1854)

3

Bombycoidea

Sphingidae

Macroglossinae

Cephonodes hylas

(Linnaeus, 1771)

4

Bombycoidea

Sphingidae

Macroglossinae

Hippotion celerio

(Linnaeus, 1758)

5

Bombycoidea

Sphingidae

Macroglossinae

Hippotion boerhaviae

(Fabricius, 1775)

6

Bombycoidea

Sphingidae

Macroglossinae

Nephele hespera

(Fabricius, 1775)

7

Bombycoidea

Sphingidae

Macroglossinae

Theretra   oldenlandiae

(Fabricius, 1775)

8

Bombycoidea

Sphingidae

Macroglossinae

Theretra alecto

(Linnaeus, 1758

9

Bombycoidea

Sphingidae

Smerinthinae

Marumba dyras dyras

(Walker, 1856)

10

Bombycoidea

Sphingidae

Sphinginae

Agrius convolvuli

(Linnaeus, 1758)

11

Bombycoidea

Saturniidae

Saturniinae

Actias selene

(Hubner, 1806)

12

Bombycoidea

Saturniidae

Saturniinae

Attacus atlas

(Linnaeus, 1758)

13

Bombycoidea

Saturniidae

Saturniinae

Antheraea paphia

(Linnaeus, 1758)

14

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Ascotis selenaria

(Denis-Schiffermüller, 1865)

15

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Biston suppressania

(Guenee,1854)

16

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Chiasmia  fidoniata

(Guenee,1858)

17

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Chiasma cf. nora

(Walker, 1861)

18

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Chiasmia eleonora

(Cramer,1780)

19

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Chiasmia emersaria

(Walker, 1861)

20

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Zamarada  excisa

(Hampson, 1891)

21

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Hyperythra lutea

(Stoll, 1781)

22

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Isturgia disputaria

(Guenee, 1858)

23

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Hyposidra talaca

(Walker, 1860)

24

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Hypomecis  infixaria

(Walker, 1860)

25

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Petelia medardaria

Herrich-Schäffer, 1865)

26

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Scardamia metallaria

(Guenée, 1858)

27

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Ennominae

Cleora injectaria

(Walker, 1860)

28

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Sterrhinae

Tramanda mundissima

(Walker, 1861)

29

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Sterrhinae

Scopula pulchellata

(Fabricius, 1794)

30

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Sterrhinae

Scopula emissaria

(Walker, 1861)

31

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Sterrhinae

Scopula caesaria

(Walker, 1861)

32

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Sterrhinae

Scopula cuneilinea

(Walker, 1861)

33

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Geometriinae

Pelagodes falsaria

(Prout, 1912)

34

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Geometriinae

Aporandria specularia

(Guenee, 1858)

35

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Geometriinae

Maxates veninotata

(Warren, 1894)

36

Geometroidea

Geometridae

Geometriinae

Thalassodes  quadraria

(Guenee  (1857)

37

Hyblaeoidea

Hyblaeidae

-

Hyblaea puera

(Cramer, 1777)

38

Lasiocampoidea

Lasiocampidae

Lasiocampinae

Metanastria hyrtaea

(Cramer, 1782)

39

Lasiocampoidea

Lasiocampidae

Lasiocampinae

Trabala vishnou

(Lefebvre, 1827)

40

Noctuoidea

Notodontidae

Cerurinae

Neocerura liturata

(Walker, 1855)

41

Noctuoidea

Notodontidae

Spataliinae

Allata argentifera

(Walker, 1862)

42

Noctuoidea

Notodontidae

Phalerinae

Antheua servula

(Drury, 1773)

43

Noctuoidea

Notodontidae

Dicranurinae

Netria viridescens

(Walker, 1855)

44

Noctuoidea

Notodontidae

Pygaerinae

Spatalia argentifera

(Walker, 1862)

45

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Aganainae

Asota  ficus

(Fabricius, 1775)

46

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Aganainae

Asota caricae

(Fabricius, 1775)

47

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Aganainae

Digama hearseyana

(Moore, 1859)

48

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Anobinae

Plecoptera reflexa

(Guenee, 1852)

49

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Acantholipes miser

(Butler, 1883)

50

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Aemene taproboris

(Walker, 1854)

51

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Aloa lactinea

(Cramer, 1777)

52

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Amata cyssea

(Stoll, 1782)

53

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Argina astrea

(Drury, 1773)

54

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Brunia antica

(Walker, 1854)

55

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Creatonotos gangis

(Linnaeus, 1758)

56

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Creatonotos transiens

(Walker, 1855)

57

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Eressa  confinis

(Walker, 1854)

58

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Estigmene  perrotteti

(Guerin-Meneville, 1844)

59

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Mangina astrea

(Drury, 1773)

60

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Olepa ricini

(Fabricius, 1775)

61

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Rajendra biguttata

(Walker, 1855)

62

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Spilarctia obliqua

(Walker, 1855)

63

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Syntomoides imaon

(Cramer,1779)

64

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Utetheisa  lotrix

(Cramer, 1779)

65

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Utetheisa  pulchelloides

(Hampson, 1907)

66

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Arctiinae

Hypocala restrata

(Fabricius, 1794)

67

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Trigonodes hyppasia

Cramer, (1779)

68

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Achea janata

(Linnaeus, 1758)

69

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Pericyma cruegeri

(Butler, 1886)

70

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Cyana  puella

(Drury, 1773)

71

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Bastilla algira

(Linnaeus, 1767)

72

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Bastilla conficiens

(Walker, 1858)

73

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Chalciope  mygdon

(Cramer, 1777)

74

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Disgonia algira

(Linnaeus, 1767)

75

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Fodina  cuneigera

(Butler, 1889)

76

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Grammodes geometrica

(Fabricius, 1775)

77

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Mocis frugalis

(Fabricius, 1775)

78

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Mocis undata

(Fabricius, 1775)

79

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Ophiusa triphaenoides

(Walker, 1858)

80

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Ophiusa tirhaca

(Cramer, 1777)

81

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Spirama retorta

(Clerck, 1764)

82

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Erebinae

Hypena abysisinialis

(Gueree, 1854)

83

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Artaxa  digramma

Boisduval, 1844)

84

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Artaxa guttara

(Walker, 1855)

85

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Euproctis lunata

(Walker, 1855)

86

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Lymantria incerta

(Walker, 1855)

87

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Lymantria  marginata

(Walker, 1855)

88

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Lymantria  serva

(Fabricius, 1793)

89

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Lymantria mathura

(Moore, 1865)

90

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Perina nuda

(Fabricius,1787)

91

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Lymantriinae

Orvasca subnotata

(Walker, 1865)

92

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Scoliopteryginae

Anomis flava

(Fabricius, 1775)

93

Noctuoidea

Erebidae

Pangraptinae

Episparis liturata

(Fabricius, 1787)

94

Noctuoidea

Eutellidae

Stictoperinae

Lophoptera illucida

(Walker, 1865)

95

Noctuoidea

Eutellidae

Stictoperinae

Lophoptera squammigera

(Guenee, 1852)

96

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Condicinae

Condica illecta

(Walker, 1865)

97

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Eriopinae

Callopistria maillardi

(Gueree, 1854)

98

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Heliothinae

Helicoverpa  armigera

(Hubner, 1805)

99

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Noctuinae

Mythimna separata

(Walker, 1865)

100

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Noctuinae

Mythimna  unipuncta

(Haworth, 1809)

101

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Noctuinae

Spodoptera litura

(Fabricius, 1775)

102

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Noctuinae

Spodoptera frugiperda

(Smith, 1797)

103

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Noctuinae

Spodoptera exigua

(Hubner, 1808)

104

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Noctuinae

Agrotis  biconica

(Kollar, 1844)

105

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Noctuinae

Agrotis segetum

(Denis & Schiffermuller 1775)

106

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Noctuinae

Agrotis ipsilion

(Hufnagel, 1766)

107

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Plusiinae

Chrysodeixis eriosoma

(Doubleday, 1843

108

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Plusiinae

Thysanoplusia orichalcea

(Fabricius, 1775)

109

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Bagisarinae

Xanthodes transversa

(Guenée, 1857)

110

Noctuoidea

Noctuidae

Acontiinae

Aedia leucomelas

(Linnaeus, 1758)

111

Noctuoidea

Nolidae

Chloephorinae

Carea angulata

(Fabricius, 1793)

112

Noctuoidea

Nolidae

Wastermanniinae

Wastermannia superba

(Hubner, 1823)

113

Noctuoidea

Nolidae

Eariadinae

Earias vittella

(Fabricius, 1794

114

Pterophoroidea


Pterophoridae





Pterophorinae

Hellinsia homodactyla

(Walker, (1864)

115

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Acentropinae

Haritalodes derogata

(Fabricius, 1775)

116

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Acentropinae

Eoophyla peribocalis

(Walker, 1859)

117

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Acentropinae

Parapoynx diminutalis

(Snellen, 1880)

118

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Acentropinae

Parapoynx stagnalis

(Zeller, 1852)

119

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Crambinae

Chilo suppressalis

(Walker, 1863)

120

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Crambinae

Chilo partellus

(Swinhoe, 1885)

121

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Agroteria scissalis

(Walker, 1866)

122

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Agrotera basinotata

(Hampson, 1891)

123

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Agathodes ostentalis

(Geyer, 1837)

124

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Cnaphalocrocis medinalis

(Guenee, 1854)

125

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Cydalima laticostalis

(Gueree, 1854)

126

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Cydalima conchylalis

(Guenee, 1854)

127

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Conogethes punctiferalis

(Guenee, 1854)

128

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Diaphania indica

Saunders, 1851)

129

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Synclera traducalis

(Zeller, 1852)

130

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Glyphodes bicolor

(Swainson, 1821)

131

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Maruca vitrata

(Fabricius, 1787)

132

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Pygospila tyres

(Cramer, 1779)

133

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Sameodes cancellalis

(Zeller, 1852)

134

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Spilomelinae

Spoladea recurralis

(Fabricius, 1787)

135

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Pyraustinae

Herpetogramma licarsisalis

(Walker, 1859)

136

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Pyraustinae

Lamprophaia ablactalis

(Walker, 1859)

137

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Pyraustinae

Omiodes analis

(Snellen, 1880)

138

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Pyraustinae

Pleuroptya balteata

(Fabricius, 1798)

139

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Pyraustinae

Pycnarmon  cribrata

(Fabricius, 1794)

140

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Pyraustinae

Paliga machoeralis

(Walker, 1859)

141

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Pyraustinae

Pyrausta panopealis

(Walker, 1859)

142

Pyraloidea

Crambidae

Schoenobiinae

Scirpophaga incertulus

(Walker, 1863)

143

Thyridoidea

Thyrididae

Striglininae

Striglina scitaria

(Walker, 1862)

144

Tortricoidea

Tortricidae

Olethreutinae

Loboschiza koenigiana

(Fabricius, 1775)

145

Zygaenoidea

Limacodidae

Limacodinae

Birthamoides junctura

(Walker, 1865)

146

Zygaenoidea

Limacodidae

Limacodinae

Miresa albipuncta

(Herrich-Schäffer, 1854)

147

Zygaenoidea

Limacodidae

Limacodinae

Parasa pastoralis

(Butler, 1885)

148

Zygaenoidea

Limacodidae

Limacodinae

Thosea  tripartita

(Moore, 1884)

Fig. 1. Graph showing families wise of moths with species in percentage.

Fig. 2.  Graph showing families wised number of moth with genera.

Moth Diversity of Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary, Mandsaur and Neemach, Madhya Pradesh

Synclera traducalis          (Zeller, 1852)

Eoophyla peribocalis (Walker, 1859)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\Bori WULS-Tour survey Photos-Limje camera-2024-Paunikar\128D7500\DSC_7258.JPG

Parotis marginata     (Hamson, 1893)

D:\Dr. Sanjay D. Paunikar, Scientist-E, CZRC, Jabalpur\Panna Biospere Reserve-Tour Proposal-2022\Panna Biosphere Reserve Tour Report-2022\Panna BP-Limje- CAMERA\_DSC9580.JPG

Sploaeda recurvalsv 

(Fab. 1775)

F:\Punjab Tour Survey photos-2021 Mobile Camera\IMG_20210822_221903.jpg

Agathodes ostentalis 

(Geyer, 1837)

C:\Users\DELL\Downloads\IMG_20200720_213300.jpg

Bradina diagonalis

 (Walker, 1866)

F:\ALL ZSI-MOTHS-PLATES-Cot-2021\Moths photos-ZSI-DDN-2021\IMG_20210224_212327.jpg

Eressa  confinis 

(Walker, 1854)

E:\DR.Sanjay Paunikar-2020\September-2020-Folder\Butterflis of Himlaya\zsi moth and reserach paper of forest insects\IMG_20190819_201925.jpg

Achaea janata 

(Linnaeus, 1758)


Chalciope mygdon 

(Cramer, 1777)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\Bori WLS Tour Report-2024\Bori WLS Tour-Mobie photos-Paunikar-2024\IMG20241121114628.jpg

Syntomoides imaon 

(Cramer 1779) 

Cydalima laticostalis (Guenee, 1854)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\MRP-2023\MPR-June-2023\Photos of Moths-JUNE-23\A-24492-Asota caricae Fabricius, 1775.JPG

Asota caricae

(Fab., 1775)

Chiasmia emersaria 

(Walker 1861)


Maxates veninotata

 (Warren, 1894)

I:\Limje Phtoto- Kuno and Gandhi Sagar WLS-2023\Moths of Kuno\DSC_6320.JPG

Hyperythra lutea 

(Stol., 1781)

I:\MRP-2023\MPR-July-2023\RFD- 1 & 2 Photos of Moths-JULY-23-Sanjay Paunikar\A-24604-Hyposidra talaca, Walker, 1860.JPG

Hypocidra talaca 

(Walk., 1860)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\MRP-2023\MPR-July-2023\RFD- 1 & 2 Photos of Moths-JULY-23-Sanjay Paunikar\A-24601-Spodoptera litura Fabricius, 1775.JPG

Spodoptera litura

 (Fabri., 1775)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\MRP-2023\MRP-February-2023-SD-\Insecta -February-2023\A-24157-Chrysodeixis eriosoma, Doubledy, 1843.JPG

Chrysodeixis eriosoma (Doub., 1843)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\MRP-2023\MRP-April-2023-DR.SDP\RFD-I & II- April-23-Photos-Insecta and Fish\A-24323-Hyblea puera Cramer, 1777.JPG

Hyblaea puera 

(Cram., 1777)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\BOOK CHAPTER-KUNO-GANDHISAGAR AND -01.04.2024RATAPANI\Book Chapter KUNO-Gandhisagar and Ratapani-01.04.2024\MOTHS-ALL\MOTHS OF RATAPANI-2024\Trabala vishnou Lefebvre, 1827, Vishnou Lappet moth.JPG

Trabala vishnou 

 (Lefe., 1827)

I:\MRP-2023\MPR-September-2023-SDP\SDP-Spetember-2023\Photos of Moths and Odonata-September-2023-SDP\A-24802-Metanastria hyrtaca (Cramer, [1779]).JPG

Metanastria hyrtaca 

(Cram., 1779)

H:\Dr. SANJAY  PAUNIKAR, Scientist-E-2023\MRP-2022-23 for APAR-CZRC, Jabalpur-SDP\MRP-August-2022\RFD Dr Paunikar Aug 2022\A-23460-Eupterote undata Blanchard.JPG

Eupterote undata

 (Blanchard, 1844)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\MRP-2023\MPR-July-2023\RFD- 1 & 2 Photos of Moths-JULY-23-Sanjay Paunikar\A-24614-Agrius convolvuli Linnaeus, 1758.JPG

Agrius convolvuli 

(Linn., 1758)

C:\Users\DELL\Desktop\Bori WULS-Tour survey Photos-Limje camera-2024-Paunikar\128D7500\DSC_7263.JPG

Antheraea mylitta 

(Drury, 1773)    


Conclusion

The present work has been carried out to elucidate a preliminary checklist of moth fauna from Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh which has not been explored previously.  The present investigation, we identified 148 species, 121 genera, 44 subfamilies and 17 families under 10 superfamilies from the study area. The family Erebidae 49 species was dominant, followed by Crambidae 28 species, Geometridae 23 species, Noctuidae 15 species, Sphingidae 8 species, Notodontidae 5, Limacodidae 4 species, Nolidae and Saturniidae 3 species each, Euteliidae and Lasicocampidae 2 species each. The other families are Bombycidae, Hybaleidae, Eupterotidae, Pterophoridae and Thyrididae one species each were the least recorded families. Erebidae, Crambidae, Geometridae and Noctuidae families remains the most species rich and the most abundant from the study sites. Although preliminary, the study will provide valuable baseline data for moth diversity of the area that has not been reported. 

Future Scope

The present study has been carried out to elucidate a fauna which was previously unknown and it is a small step towards a complete taxonomic understanding of moth species from the Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary of Madhya Pradesh. The researchers and other conservationist can collect a lot of information based on the study of that place later on. This research will serve as a further study on the moth diversity of other wildlife sanctuary of different states of the country. It will be helpful for future generation for further study to assess this important lepidopteran insects.

References

Barlow, H. S. (1982). An introduction to the moths of South East Asia. Malayan Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur. 305 pp.

Beeson, C. F. C. (1941). The Ecology and Control of Forest Insects of India and Neighboring Countries. New Delhi, India.

Bell, T. R. D. and Scott, F. B. (1937). Fauna of British India, including Ceyon and Burma. Moths–Volume 5, Sphingidae, Taylor and Francis, London. 537 pp.

Browne, F. G. (1968). Pests and diseases of forest plantation Trees. Clarendon Press, 1330. 

Chandra, K. (2009). Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera. Fauna of Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve, Conservation Area Series, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, 39, 337-354.

Chandra, K. and Sambath, S. (2016a). Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera (Moths). In: Faunal Diversity of Singhori Wildlife Sanctuary, district Raisen, Madhya Pradesh, Fauna of Conservation Area series, 57, 185-215.

Chandra, K. (2011). Insect fauna of states and union territories in India, pp. 189-218. In: Uniyal V P, Shrivastava, A. (Eds.), Arthropods and their Conservation in India (Insects and Spiders). ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas, Dehradun, Wildlife Institute of India, 14, 1-232.

Chandra, K. and Nema, D. K. (2008). Moths of Bandhavgarh National Park, Madhya Pradesh. Records of the Zoological Survey of India108(2), 95-110.

Chandra, K. and Nema, D. K. (2003). Moths of Pench Tiger Reserve, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Tropical Forestry, 19(1-2), 68-78. 

Chandra, K. and Nema, D. K. (2007). Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera. In: Fauna of Madhya Pradesh including Chhattisgarh, State Fauna Series 15 (Part: I), Zoological Survey of India, 347-418. 

Chandra, K. and Sambath S. (2016b). Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera (Moths). In: Faunal Diversity of Veerangana Durgawati Wildlife Sanctuary, district Damoh, Madhya Pradesh, Fauna of Conservation Area series, 56, 173-213. Zool. Surv. India.

Chandra, K., Kumar, V., Singh, N. Raha, A., Sanyal, A. K. (2019). Assemblages of Lepidoptera in Indian Himalaya through Long Term Monitoring Plots: 1-457. Published by the Director, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata.

Chandra, K., Pandey, R., Bhandari, R. and Sambath, S. (2013). Diversity of hawk moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) in Veerangana Durgavat Wildlife Sanctuary, Damoh, Madhya Pradesh. Biological Forum– An International Journal, 5(1), 73-77.

Cotes, E. C. and Swinhoe, C. C. (1889). A Catalogue of Moths of India. Part I- VI: Sphinges, Bombyces, Noctues, Pseudo- Deltoids and Deltoids, Geometrites, Pyrales, Crambites, Tortrices and Addenda. Orders of trustees of Indian Museum, Calcutta, India, 40 pp.

Hampson, G. F. (1892). The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Moths-Volume 1, Saturniidae to Hypsidae. Taylor and Francis, London, 527pp+333figs.

Hampson, G. F. (1894). The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Moths-Volume 2, Arctiidae, Agrostidae, Noctuidae.Taylor and Francis, London, 609pp+325figs.

Hampson, G. F. (1895). The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Moths-Volume 3, Noctuidae (cont.) to Geometridae. Taylor and Francis, London, 546pp+226figs.

Hampson, G. F. (1896). The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Moths-Volume 4. Pyralidae. Taylor and Francis, London, 594pp+287figs.

Joshi, K. C., Kulkarni, N., Roychoudhury, N., Chandra, S. and Barve, S. (2004). A study of insects from Kanha National Park. Journal of Tropical Forestry, 20(III & IV), 58-74. 

Kalawate, A. S., Palot, M. J., Valappil, B., Tripathy, B. and Banerjee, D. (2024). A Field Guide to common Butterflies and Moths (Lepidoptera) of Western Ghats. Published by Director, Zool. Surv. of India. Kolkata.i-206 p.

Kathirvelu, C., Ayyasamy, R. and Karthikeyan, M. (2019). Preliminary checklist of moths (Lepidoptera: Glossata) of Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 11(2), 404-409. 

Kendrick, R. C. (2007). The conservation assessment of moths in Hong Kong. In Kendrick, R.C. (ed.) Proceedings of the First South East Asian Lepidoptera Conservation Symposium, Hong Kong 2006. pp. 71-82. Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden, Hong Kong. 

Kirti, J. S. and Singh, N. (2015). Arctiid Moths of India, Volume 1. Nature Books, New Delhi, India, 205pp.

Kirti, J. S. and Singh, N. (2016). Arctiid Moths of India, Volume 2. Nature Books, New Delhi, India, 214pp.

Kirti, J. S., Chandra, K., Saxena, A. and Singh, N. (2019). Geometrid Moths of India. Nature Books of India, New Delhi, 296pp.

Kitching, R. L., Orr, A. G., Thalib, L., Mitchell, H., Hopkins, M. S. and Graham, A. W. (2000). Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, 284-297.

Lees, D. C. and Zilli, A. (2019). Moths: Their biology, diversity and evolution. Natural History Museum, London, 208.

Lewis, O. T. (2001). Effects of experimental selective logging on tropical butterflies. Biological Conservation, 15, 389–400.

Lomov, B., Keith, D. A., Britton, D. R. and Hochuli, D. F. (2006). Are butterflies and moths useful indicators for restoration monitoring? A pilot study in Sydney’s Cumberland Plain Woodland. Ecological Management and Restoration, 7, 204–210.

MacGregor, C. A., Pocock, M. J. O., Fox, R. and Evans, D. M. (2015). Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review. Ecological Entomology, 40(3), 187-198. 

Nair, K. S. S. (2007). Tropical Forest Insect Pest Ecology impact and management. M.S. Dissertation, University of Cambridge Press New York. 

Pathania, P. C. and Kumari, Anita (2009). A primary report on Rhopalocera diversity (Lepidoptera) from districtUna of Himachal Pradesh, India. Biological Forum — An International Journal, 1(2), 80-88.

Pathania, P. C., Sharma Sunita and Gill, A. K. (2014). Hawk moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) from North-West Himalaya along with collection housed in National PAU Insect museum, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 6(1), 120-127.

Paunikar, S. and Sharma, G. (2022a). Butterfly species diversity and distribution in protected forest areas of North-West Himalaya of India. Biological Forum–An International Journal, 14(4), 1004-1015.

Paunikar, S., Kulkarni, N. and Barve, S. (2023b). Moth diversity (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) in the forest ecosystem of Tropical Forest Research Institute (TFRI), campus, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Entomology Research, 8(9), 25-32.

Paunikar, S., Nair, A. and Sambath, S. (2024). Study on diversity of Moth (Lepidoptera: Heretocera) of Ratapani Wildlife Sanctuary and Tiger reserves, Raisen and Sehore district of Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal of Tropical Biodiversity, 32(1), 66-76.

Paunikar, S., Sharma, G. and Nair, A. (2023a) Moths Diversity (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in the different forest areas of Doon Valley, Uttarakhand. (Eds)., Biodiversity Conservation and its Application. pp-12-38. (Published by Kushwaha, S. and Khare, P.).

Paunikar, S. D., Sharma, G. and Sathiskumar, V. S. (2021). Diversity of Moth (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) in different forest areas of North-West Himalaya. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology, 42(24), 925-935.

Ramakrishna, Chandra, K., Nema Ahirwar and Alfred, J. R. B. (2006). Faunal resources of National parks of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Conservation Area Series, 30, 1-123+27.

Sambath, S. (2017). A Report on the moths of Ghatigaon Wildlife Sanctuary. Bionotes, 19(1), 21-23.

Sambath, S. (2018a). On a Collection of moths (Lepidoptera) from Narsinghgarh Wildlife Sanctuary, district Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh. Bionotes, 20(4), 121-123.

Sambath, S. (2018b). Moth Fauna of Kheoni Wildlife Sanctuary, district, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh. Bionotes, 20(4), 127-129.

Sambath, S. (2020). Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera.  In: Faunal Diversity of Bhoj Wetland, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India (A Ramsar Site) Wetland Ecosystem Series, 22, 141-152. Published by the Director, Zool. Sur. India.

Sambath, S. (2022). Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera. Faunal Diversity of Nauradehi Wild Life Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh, Conservation Area Series. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, 69, 117-153.

Sambath, S. and Nair, A. (2023). Moths (Lepidopetra: Heterocera) Diversity of Sanjay-Dubri National Park and Tiger Reserve, Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Natural Resources and Development, 18(1), 61-69.

Scalercio, S., Infusino, M. and Woiwod, I. P. (2009). Optimising the sampling window for moth indicator communities. Journal of Insect Conservation, 13(6), 583.

Sharma, G., Kumar, R., Pathania P. C. and Ramamurthy, V. V. (2008). Biodiversity of Lepidopterous Insects associated with vegetables in India: A study. Indian Journal of Entomology, 70(4), 369-384. 

Shubhalaxmi, V. (2018). Field Guide to  Indian Moths. Ed.1, pp (VI+461), Birdwing Publisher, India.

Singh, D., Rose, H. S. and Pathania, P. C. (2017). Studies on the selected Economically important Pyraloidea of Punjab, India. Biological Forum - An International Journal, 9(2), 172-176.

Singh, N., Kaur, A., Pathania, P. C., Sharma, N., Kalawate, A., Palot, J., Banerjee, D., Talukdar, A., Lenka, R., Kumari, A., Raha, A. and Joshi, R. (2024). Fauna of India Checklist: Arthropoda: Insecta: Lepidoptera. Version 1.0. Zoological Survey India. 

Singh, N., Lenka, R., Chatterjee, P. and Mitra, D. (2022a). Settling moths are the vital component of pollination in Himalayan ecosystem of North-East India, pollen transfer network approach revealed. Scientific Report, 12, 2716. 

Singh, N., Pathania, P. C., Joshi, R., Kalawate, A., Shah, S., Ahmad, J., Raha, A., Das, A. and Mazumdar, A. (2022b). Insecta: Lepidoptera (Moths), In: Faunal Diversity of Biogeographic zones of India: Deccan Peninsula. (Published by the Director, Zool. Surv. of India, Kolkata), 487-514.

Sondhi, S., Sondhi, Y., Singh, R. P. and Kunte, K. (2024). Moths of India.V3.82. Indian Foundation for Butterflies Trust.https://www.mothsofindia.org.

Sondhi, Y. and Sondhi, S. (2016). A partial checklist of moths (Lepidoptera) of Dehradun, Mussoorie and Devalsari in Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 8, 8756–8776. 

 Sondhi, Y., Sondhi, S., Shashank, P. R. and Kunte, K. (2018). Moth diversity (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of Shendurney and Ponmudi in Agastyamalai Biosphere Reserve, Kerala, India, with notes on new records. Tropical Lepidopterologist Research, 28, 66-89.

Srivastava, A. (2002). Taxonomy of Moths in India. International book distributors, pp. 1-249.

Summerville, K. S., Ritter, L. M. and Crist, T. O. (2004). Forest moth taxa as indicators of lepidopteran richness and habitat disturbance: a preliminary assessment. Biological Conservation, 116(1), 9-18.

Vaughan, N. (1997). The diets of British bats (Chiroptera). Mammamalia Review27, 77–94.

Wilson, W. G., Harrison, S. P., Hastings, A. and McCann, K. (1999). Exploring stable pattern formation in models of tussock moth populations. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68, 94–107.

How to cite this article

Sanjay Paunikar and Akhil Nair (2025). Studies on Moth Distribution (Insecta: Lepdioptera: Heterocera) in Gandhisagar Wildlife Sanctuary Mandsaur and Neemach Districts of Madhya Pradesh, Central India. Biological Forum, 17(2): 42-50.