Study of Zooplankton Diversity and Seasonal Variations in Raviryala Pedda Cheruvu, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

Author:

Koppu Vishnu, A.V. Rajashekhar and K. Ramesh*

Journal Name: Biological Forum, 17(7): 161-167, 2025

Address:

Department of Zoology, University College of Science, Osmania University Hyderabad (Telangana), India.

 (Corresponding author: K. Ramesh*)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.7.25

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Zooplankton are indeed tiny, microscopic aquatic animals that play a crucial role in freshwater ecosystems as a vital link in the food web and contribute significantly to the overall productivity of these environments. They are performing at second trophic level in energy flow and switch over to conversion of detritus matter into edible animal food. The present study deal with the study of Zooplankton diversity and seasonal variation in Raviryala Pedda Cheruvu was conducted to check the status in the area and provide new insights into its ecology. The study was carried out during the period of two years i.e. June- 2022 to May- 2024. A total of 40 species were found in this reservoir. Among these, rotifers comprise of 20 species, Cladocera 07, Copepods 07, Ostracoda 2  and Protozoa 2. The season wise zooplankton analysis showed that the number of population was highest during winter (post monsoon), followed by summer (pre-monsoon) and lowest during rainy season (monsoon). 


Keywords

Raviryala Pedda Cheruvu, Zooplanktons, seasonal diversity.

Introduction

Zooplankton is crucial to aquatic ecosystems as primary consumers, linking higher trophic levels, including fish and other aquatic species, to primary producers such as phytoplankton (Dhanasekaran et al., 2017). As primary consumers, Zooplankton regulates the populations of phytoplankton by grazing, thereby preventing algal blooms and maintaining ecological balance. Zooplankton also plays a role in nutrient cycling as it recycles organic substances through feeding and excretion, thereby influencing the total productivity of freshwater systems (Butts et al., 2022). 

Zooplanktons are very sensitive to the influences of their environment and react to changes in water chemistry, temperature, and other hydrographic parameters in very obvious ways. Samples of zooplankton were taken by choosing three localities having varied environmental features. The order followed Rotifera (54.73%), and after the order came Copepoda, with a difference of 13.1, followed by Cladocera at 20.59, and then Ostracoda was 8.9%. 

The Rotifera dominated the zooplankton community, which was greatly influenced by seasonal fluctuations. Transparency, pH, conductivity, biological oxygen demand (BOD), and dissolved oxygen were important influencing factors. Ecologically zooplankton are one of the most important biotic components influencing all the functional aspects of an aquatic ecosystem, such as food chains, food webs, energy flow and cycling of matter.

Material & Methods

MATERIAL AND METHODS      

Study Area:

SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES: Sites: 1, 2, 3 and 4


Methodology

Zooplanktons are collected bimonthly from RAVIRYALA PEDDA CHERUVU from June 2022 to May 2024.

• Samples were collected around 7.00 am to 9.30 am.

• Each sample was collected by filtering 20 litres of water through plankton net.

• Filtrate was stored in 20 ml plastic bottles and 4 per cent formalin was added for sample preservation.

• The concentrated samples were fixed with 4 per cent neutralized formalin and a few drops of glycerine, allowed to settle for overnight.

• Finally the quantitative analysis was done by using a Sedgwick-rafter cell method (Bhuiyan and Nessa 1991).

• One ml sample was transferred to Sedgwick-Rafter cell with a pipette,

• Identification and enumeration were done by a Compound microscope and enumeration of plankton by help of sedgewick-rafter chamber

• The systematic identification of plankton was made by using standard keys of Adoni (1985); Michael  and Sharma (1998); Dhanapathi (2000); Altaff (2004).

Zooplanktons: 

1. Zooplankton monthly population from June-2022 to May-2023 (Organisms/mL.).

Months

Rotifers

Cladocera

Copepods

Ostracods

Protozoa

Total

Jun-2022

54

43

35

27

20

179

Jul-2022

48

39

32

26

23

168

Aug-2022

51

43

34

25

21

174

Sept-2022

50

36

31

18

22

157

Oct-2022

94

87

49

31

36

297

Nov-2022

127

102

60

38

37

364

Dec-2022

130

110

56

37

35

368

Jan-2023

132

112

59

30

39

372

Feb-2023

90

68

70

40

22

290

Mar-2023

79

59

89

60

21

308

Apr-2023

76

54

90

55

25

300

May-2023

71

48

96

60

32

307

Total

1002

801

701

447

333

3284

2. Seasonal diversity of Zooplankton from June-2022 to May-2023 (Organisms/mL.).

Zooplanktons

Monsoon

Post-Monsoon

Pre-monsoon

Total

Rotifers

203

483

316

1002

Cladocera

161

411

229

801

Copepods

132

224

345

701

Ostracods

96

136

215

447

Protozoa

86

147

100

333

Total

678

1401

1205

3284


3. Zooplankton monthly population from June-2023 to May-2024 (Organisms/mL).

Months

Rotifers

Cladocera

Copepods

Ostracods

Protozoa

Total

Jun-2023

57

46

38

30

24

195

Jul-2023

50

40

35

31

26

182

Aug-2023

52

42

37

28

22

181

Sept-2023

50

39

34

21

23

167

Oct-2023

100

87

50

35

39

311

Nov-2023

128

109

65

41

40

383

Dec-2023

137

112

60

43

38

390

Jan-2024

135

117

58

38

43

391

Feb-2024

94

73

75

48

28

318

Mar-2024

83

63

93

64

29

332

Apr-2024

81

60

98

61

30

330

May-2024

77

53

104

68

32

334

Total

1044

841

747

508

374

3514

4. Seasonal diversity of Zooplankton from june-2023 to May-2024 (Organisms/mL.).

Zooplanktons

Monsoon

Post-Monsoon

Pre-monsoon

Total

Rotifers

209

500

335

1044

Cladocera

167

425

249

841

Copepods

144

233

370

747

Ostracods

110

157

241

508

Protozoa

95

160

119

374

Total

725

1475

1314

3514

            Monsoon = June-September, Post-monsoon = October-January Pre-monsoon= February-May

Zooplankton Species Copmposition: Study on zooplankton species composition at Raviryala Pedda cheruvu for a period of two years (2022-23 & 2023-24). Total 30 species of zooplanktons were identified belonging to 5 groups, among them 17 species were observed during year 2022-2023 and 13 species of zooplanktons were recorded during the 2023-2024 year.Total 30 species of zooplanktons were identified during the study period 2022-2024 out of which 16 species of Rotifers, 04-cladocera, 05-copepods, 02-ostracods and 03 were protozoans. 

Rotifers:


 1. Ascomorpha saltans

2. Keratella cochleari

3. Brachionus bidentate

4. Brachinous diversicornis

5. Brachinous falcatus

6. Brachionus forficula

7. Brachionus calyciflorus

8. Brachionus quadridentatus

9. Cephalodella forficula

10. Colourella sp

11. Philodina sp

12. Dicranophorus forcipatus

13. Eosphora najas

14. Filinia longiseta

15. Keratella quardata

16. Keratella trophica


Cladocerans:

F:\zoo images class wise\cladocera\alonella-003.jpg

1. Alonella sp

3. Daphnia parvula

2. Moina micrura

4. Daphnia dubia


Copepods:

1. Barnacle Nauplius


2. Canthocamptus longipe

3. Cyclops bicuspidatus

4. Dicyclops thomasi

5. Diaptomus africanus



Ostracods:

1. Steno cypris


2. Cypris



Protozoans:

1. Vorticella sp


2. Paramecium caudatum

C:\Users\zology hod\Downloads\euglena.jpg

3. Euglena



    The quality of zooplanktons:

Group

Family

Genus

Species




Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas, 1776

Rotifers (16)

Brachionidae

Brachionus

Brachionus forficula


(Ehrenberg, 1838)

Pallas, 1776

Brachionus diversicornis Daday, 1883





Brachionus falcatus Zacharias, 1898

Brachionus quadridentatus Hermann, 1783



Notommatidae

Trichoceridae

Dicranophoridae (O.F Muller) 1773

Eosphora ,Cephalodella  Bory de St.Vincent 1826

Trichocera


Dicranophorus

Brachionus bidentate

Keratella quardata, Keratella Keratella cochlearis.


Cephalodella forficula, Eosphora najas (Ehrenberg, 1830)

Trichocera

Dicranophorus forcipatus


Philodinidae (Scopoli,1777

Philodina,Rotaria


Cladocerans (04)

Philodina, 



Alonella Alona

Alonella, (W.Baird, 1843)





Daphnia dubia (Herrick 1883), Daphnia parvula

(Fordyce 1901)

Dapniidae (Stratus, 1850)


Daphnia



Moinidae (Goulden, 1968

Moina Baird, 1850

Moina micrura Kurz 1874

Copepoda(05)







Cyclops

Cyclops bicuspidatus(Claus, 1857), Diacyclops thomasi(S.AForbes,1882)




Cyclopoidae

Mesocyclops Claus, 1893

Mesocyclops (G.O. Sars 1914)



(Dana, 1853)






Cypris Muller, 1776

Cypris protubera Muller, 1776


Cyprididae



Ostracods_02




Stenocypris Claus, 1892

Stenoocypris dentatomarginatus Baird, 1859

Protozoans (03)

Paramecidae (Ehrenberg

 1831)

Paramecium

Vorticella

Paramecium caudatum Euglena

Vorticella campanula



Overall population Rotifers during 2022-2023 were, 1002 organisms/mL, cladocera-801 organisms/mL, Copepods 701 organisms/mL, Ostracods 441 organisms/mL and protozoans were 333 organisms/ mL. During 2023-2024 Rotifers were 1044 organisms/mL, cladocerans 841 organisms/mL, copepods 747 organisms/mL, Ostracods 508 organisms/mL and protozoans 374 organisms/mL.  Seasonal deviations of zooplanktons recorded as 678 organisms/mL (monsoon), 1401 organisms/mL (post-monsoon and 1205 organisms/mL (pre-monsoon) during 2022-2023 year. Similarity in 2023-2024 were 725 organisms/mL(monsoon), 1475 organisms /mL (post-monsoon) and 1314 organisms /mL (pre-monsoon).


Results & Discussion

The present investigation of zooplanktons includes five groups were found i.e. rotifers, cladocerans, copepods, ostracods and protozoa and the total number of species 30 belongs to five groups of zooplankton were identified. The monthly variation of zooplankton during the 2022-2023, 2023-2024 is depicted in table numbers: 6, 7,9 and10  The highest number of rotifers in month of January  (132 organisms /mL), lowest number were in month of July (48 organisms/mL, cladocerans were highest in January (112 organisms/mL, lowest number in September (36 organisms /mL), copepods were high number in may (96 organisms/mL), lower in September (31 organisms/Ml), ostracods were high in may (60 organisms/mL), lower number in September (18 organisms/mL) and highest number  of protozoans in January(39 organisms/mL), lowest number in June, august (20 organisms /mL during 2022-2023.

The highest number of rotifers in month of December (137 organisms/mL), lowest number were in month of July and September (50 organisms/mL, cladocerans were highest in January (117 organisms/mL, lowest number in September (39 organisms/mL), copepods were high number in may (104 organisms/mL), lower in September (34 organisms/mL, ostracods were high in may (68 organisms/mL), lower number in September (21 organisms/mL) and highest number  of protozoans in January (43 organisms/mL), lowest number in  august (22 organisms/mL during 2023-2024. The present revealed 40 species of zooplanktons in Raviryala Pedda Cheruvu.

The percentage of zooplankton groups in seasonal wise during June-2022 to May-2023 was highest percentage during winter (post-monsoon) 42.66%, next 36.6% in summer (pre-monsoon) and low in rainy (monsoon) was 20.64%. The low number of zooplankton in monsoon due to the fall in temperature, low light penetration and heavy water flow wash off the surface. The percentage of different zooplanktons classes noted during June-2023 to May-2024 were Rotifers 29.7%, Cladocera 23.93%, copepods 21.25%, ostracods 14.45% and protozoa 10.6 percent respectively during this period. The percentage of zooplankton groups in seasonal wise during June-2023 to May-2024 was highest percentage during winter (post-monsoon) 41.97%, next 37.39% in summer (pre-monsoon) and low in rainy (monsoon) was 20.63%. 

Dominate number of rotifers, copepods were mainly because of small size, with short life cycles and wide tolerance to a variety of environmental factors. Overall population of Rotifers during 2022-2023 were, 1002 organisms/mL, cladocera-801 organisms/mL, Copepods 701 organisms/mL, Ostracods 447 organisms/mL and protozoans were 333 organisms/mL. During 2023-2024 Rotifers were 1044 organisms/mL, cladocerans 841 organisms/mL, copepods 747 organisms/mL, Ostracods 508 organisms/mL and protozoans 374 organisms/mL. The seasonal deviations of zooplanktons recorded as 678 organisms/mL (monsoon), 1401 organisms/mL (post-monsoon 0 and 1205 organisms/mLb(pre-monsoon) during 2022-2023 year. Similarity in 2023-2024 were 725 organisms/mL (monsoon), 1475 organisms/mL (post-monsoon) and 1314 organisms/mL (pre-monsoon).


Conclusion

Zooplankton diversity and abundance of this lake showed significant seasonal variations, with influenced by environmental factors like temperature, rainfall, and food availability. In this lake zooplankton populations were more diverse and abundant during post-monsoon, due to more favorable for growth and reproduction, and less diverse during rainy seasons due to dilution and other factors. Different zooplankton groups, above mentioned such as rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods, may exhibit varying responses to seasonal changes. Rotifers, were often abundant in eutrophic (nutrient-rich) waters and it showed that water quality indicators. Monitoring zooplankton diversity and abundance of this lake clearly provided valuable insights into the impacts of climate change and other environmental factors on aquatic ecosystems.

Scope of this study: The scope of zooplankton diversity in a lake ecosystem is broad and reflects the complex interplay between various biotic and abiotic factors. Understanding this diversity is essential for assessing the health of the lake and managing its resources sustainably.

Ecosystem Management: Understanding zooplankton diversity helps in managing water quality, controlling harmful algal blooms, and maintaining a healthy aquatic ecosystem. 

Conservation Efforts: Knowing which species are present and how they respond to environmental changes is essential for developing targeted conservation strategies. 

Resource Management: By monitoring zooplankton, we can gain insights into the overall health of the lake and manage its resources sustainably. 

References

Altaff, K. (2004). A manual of Zooplankton University Grants commission, New Delhi.

Adoni A. D. (1985). Work book on limnology. Pratibha Publishers C-10 Gour Nagar, Sagar-470 003, India, 216.

Butts, T. J., Moody, E. K. and Wilkinson, G. M. (2022). Contribution of zooplankton nutrient recycling and effects on phytoplankton size structure in a hypereutrophic reservoir. Journal of Plankton Research, 44(6), 839-853. 

Bhuiyan, A. S. and Nessa, Q. (1991). A quantitative study of zooplankton in relation to the physicochemical conditions of a freshwater fish pond of Rajshahi. Univ. J. Zool. Rajshahi Univ., 17, 29-37.

Dhanasekaran, M., Bhavan, P. S., Manickam, N. and Kalpana, R. (2017). Physico-chemical characteristics and zooplankton diversity in a perennial lake at Dharmapuri (Tamil Nadu, India). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies5(1), 285-292.

Dhanapathi, M. V. S.S.S. (2000). Taxonomic notes on the rotifers from India, IAAB, Hyderabad, 1-78 (2000).

Michael, R. G. and Sharma, B. K. (1998). Fauna of India. Indian Cladocera (Crustacea: Brachinous: Cladocera), The Technical and General Press, India, 262 (1998).


How to cite this article

Koppu Vishnu, A.V. Rajashekhar and K. Ramesh  (2025). Study of Zooplankton Diversity and Seasonal Variations in Raviryala Pedda Cheruvu, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. Biological Forum, 17(7): 161-167.