Taxonomic Studies of the Species Belenois aurota (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from India

Author: Manpreet Kaur1*, Jagbir Singh Kirti1 and Avtar Kaur Sidhu2

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(1): 231-238, 2024

Address:

1Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala (Punjab), India.

2High Altitude Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Saproon, Solan (Punjab), India.

(Corresponding author: Manpreet Kaur*)

DOI: -

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

In the present research work, the morphological features including genitalia and distribution of Belenois aurota (Fabricius) have been studied in detail. Klots (1931) studied the genitalia of Prioneris Wallace and mentioned its strong resemblance with the genitalia of Belenois Drury but there is no illustration and description of the male and female genitalia Belenois Drury. In this manuscript, the male genitalia of both the forms i.e. DSF and WSF and female genitalia of WSF of Belenois aurota (Fabricius) have been studied, illustrated and compared for the first time.

Keywords

Belenois aurota, dry season form, wet season form, genitalia.

Introduction

Drury (1773) reported the genus Belenois with the type species Papilio calypso (Drury). There are total 30 species under genus Belenois which are widely distributed in Indian subcontinent, south-east Asia, Australia and Afrotropical region (Chandra, 1985; Kunte, 2006; Ghosh and Saha 2016). Belenois aurota (Fabricius) has a wide distributional range extending across Arabia to the Indian subcontinent, sub-Saharan Africa and north of the Himalayas in Turkmenia and Tajikistan (Haldhar et al., 2016). Whereas, in India only one species i.e. Belenois aurota (Fabricius) has been reported so far. Out of three subspecies i.e. Belenois aurota taprobana (Moore), Belenois aurota aurota (Fabricius) and Belenois aurota turanica (Sheljuzhko) only Belenois aurota aurota (Fabricius) has been reported so far from India (Talbot, 1939). This genus is studied by various eminent workers like Moore (1881); Bingham (1907); Klots (1931); Evans (1932); Talbot (1939); Vane Wright (2003). Bingham (1907) described it as Anaphaeis mesentina and studied its external morphological descriptions and distribution of its DSF and WSF. Bingham (1907) reported a DSF specimen of this species collected by Mr. G. Rogers, Deputy Conservator of Forests from Great Nicobar Islands. Klots (1931) described it as Belenois aurota (Fabricius) and studied the genitalia of Prioneris Wallace and mentioned its strong resemblance with the genitalia of Belenois, Drury but there is no illustration and description of the genitalia of Belenois Drury. Evans (1932) devised its key including DSF and WSF. Talbot (1939) described its DSF, WSF and external morphological attributes in detail. Gasse (2013) recorded it as a straggler from Great Nicobar Islands. During the past few years, the research on this genus is related to the species diversity, richness, and abundance. Noor et al. (2018) conducted field survey to update the latest diversity of butterfly fauna in the Quetta region of Pakistan from April to October, 2012 and found Belenois aurota as the most abundant species in that region. Paria et al. (2018) studied the distribution of various butterflies in and surrounding areas of the protected forests of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha, India and the Belenois aurota was reported as the exclusive visitor to interspersed water bodies in that Sanctuary. Gehlot et al. (2021) explored the diversity of moths and butterflies  from the urban localities of Jodhpur and found B. aurota as very rare species in those particular areas. Ge et al. (2021) reported Belenois aurota for the first time and the highest altitude record of this species from the Chinese-Indian border area in Tibet Autonomous Region. Bhatnagar et al. (2022) studied the diversity of insect visitors on blossom of Acacia senegal at Kaylana Kumathiya enclosure located in Jodhpur, Rajasthan  and recorded B. aurota as one of the visitor on Acacia senegal  flowers during forenoon. Kumari and Thakur (2022) investigated the biodiversity of butterflies from Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India during 2019 to 2021. The main objective of this research was to study the current status of species richness and diversity, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicated abundance of Belenois aurota in 2019 and 2021 only. Kumar et al. (2023) prepared the preliminary checklist of the diversity of butterflies from the Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, India and found rare record of Belenois aurota

In this research work, the male genitalia of both the forms i.e. DSF and WSF and female genitalia of WSF of Belenois aurota (Fabricius) have been studied, illustrated and compared for the first time. 

Material & Methods

During present studies, the adults were collected by using sweeping net from different localities of India. The specimens were killed, stretched and preserved as per standard techniques in Lepidopterology. Each specimen was tagged with the labels of locality, date of collection, altitude, etc. The representatives were identified on the basis of their morphological characters by consulting literature such as Antram (1924); Bingham (1907); Evans (1932); Talbot (1939). The collections lying in the National Museum, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata were also examined and identified by consulting the fauna, keys and catalogues (Evans, 1932; Talbot, 1939; Kehimkar, 2008; Varshney and Smetacek 2015). The adult images both from the dorsal and ventral sides were obtained with a digital camera (Nikon digital camera 18-105mm). The genitalia dissections were performed by adopting the method proposed by Robinson (1976). The terminology for the male genitalia has been adopted from Klot (1970). The photography of the male external genitalia has been accomplished by using Leica microscope equipped with a photographic unit. 

Results & Discussion

Genus Belenois Hübner, 1819

Common name: Caper Whites

BelenoisHübner, 1819; Verz. bek.Schmett. (6): 92.

AnaphaeisHübner, 1819; Verz. bek. Schmett. (6): 93.

Glycestha Billberg, 1820; Enum. Ins. Mus. Bill.: 76.

Pseudohuphina Stoneham, 1940; Bull. Stoneham Mus. (40): 4.

Pseudanaphaeis Bernardi, 1953; Rev. franc. Ent.20 (1): 50.

Belenois Moore, 1881; Lepid. Ceylon 1 (4): 137.

Belenois Winhard, 2000; Butterflies of the World 10: 27.

Type species: Papilio calypso (Drury, 1773)

Papilio calypso Drury, 1773; Illust. Nat. Hist. Exot. Insects 2: 17.

Distribution: India, Ethiopia, Sudan, Kenya, Tanzania, Rhodesia, Uganda, Africa,  Palestine (Israel-Jordan), Indonesia, Australia, Java, Sulawesi, Britain, Ireland, Liberia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Baluchistan, Arabia, Sri Lanka, Rhodesia.

Belenois aurota (Fabricius, 1793)

Common name: Brown-veined White

Papilio aurota Fabricius, 1793; Ent. Syst. 3 (1): 197.

Papilio mesentina Cramer, 1780; Uitl. Kapellen 3: 140.

Anaphaeis aurota Korb & Bolshakov, 2011; Eversmannia Suppl. 2: 26.

Distribution India: Maharashtra, Karnataka, Uttarakhand, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Delhi, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Jammu & Kashmir, Chandigarh, Sikkim.

Global distribution: Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Palestine (Israel-Jordan), Pakistan, Australia, Afghanistan, Baluchistan, Vietnam, Arabia, Tropical Africa, Madagascar, Turkmenia, Tajikistan.

Belenois aurota aurota (Fabricius)

Papilio aurota Fabricius, 1793; Ent. Syst.3 (1): 197.

Anapheis aurota Hemming, 1932, p. 283.

Pieris mesentina Moore, 1857a, p. 72

Belenois mesentina Davidson, Bell and Aitken, 1897a, p. 575.

Adult (Male WSF): Forewing dorsal surface whitish with black costa upto vein 11; black curved bar at the end cell; apex widely black with six white spots, anterior spots are large. Ventral side similar to ventral side, maculation is more sharpened and white spots at the apex enlarged. Hindwing dorsal surface white with black marginal dentate border forming four white circular spots. Ventral side chrome-yellow; dark black prominent veins; black marginal dentate border forming circular spots.

Adult (Male DSF lordaca): Wing maculation same as in WSF, but markings on the dorsal side are thin with wide and large white spots at the apex. Dorsal and ventral surface white. Hindwing dorsal surface white with border white marginal spots. Ventral surface white with little yellow base.

Adult (Female WSF): Similar to male but the wing maculation is more darker, white spots at the apex of forewing are smaller. 

Adult (Female DSF): Similar to wet season form but the dorsal side with narrower black markings, forewing with broader and longer white markings, hindwing with larger white submarginal spots. Forewing ventral side ground colour pure white but hindwing slightly yellowish (Talbot, 1939).

Wing expanse: 50-55 mm.

Male Genitalia (Male WSF)(Plate 1): Uncus narrow arched, finger-like with apex rounded; tegumen longer, not broader, posses long articulatory process; vinculum concave; saccus thin, smaller than tegumen and flat, distal end rounded; valve leaf-like, apex produced to form a sharp slightly upcurved tip; juxta V-shaped, moderately longer, little curved; aedeagus long, thin, straight, subzone slightly swollen and much smaller than suprazone, ductus ejaculatorious entering caudo-dorsad.

Male Genitalia (Male DSF lordaca) (Plate 2): Uncus slightly much narrower, longer and less arched, finger-like with apex rounded; tegumen longer and narrower, posses long articulatory process; vinculum concave; saccus thin and narrow, smaller than tegumen and flat, distal end rounded; valve leaf-like, apex elongates to form a sharp slightly upcurved pointed tip; juxta V-shaped, moderately longer, little curved; aedeagus long, thin, straight, subzone slightly swollen and much smaller than suprazone, ductus ejaculatorious entering caudo-dorsad.

Female Genitalia (Plate 3): Posterior apophysis long and thin, anterior apophysis very small; ductus bursae long, narrow, membranous; corpus bursae almost spherical, spindle-shaped signum, present below middle of corpus bursae, with sharp pointed ends and dentate margins; appendix bursae large, globular, well separated from corpus bursae.

Plate 1. A. Forewing, B. Hindwing, C. Male genitalia, D. Aedeagus, E. Male Genitalia (Dorsal view), F. Valva, G. Male genitalia (Lateral view), H. Uncus (Dorsal view).

Plate 2. A. Forewing, B. Hindwing, C. Male genitalia, D. Aedeagus, E. Male Genitalia (Lateral view), F. Valva, G. Male genitalia (Dorsal view), H. Uncus (Dorsal view).

Material examined: ZSI, Kolkata, National Museum Collections.

1♂ (WSF), 1. xii.1956, Pali, Rajasthan; 1♂(DSF), 25. iv.1958, Jaipur, Rajasthan, (Coll. T.G. Vazirani); 1♂,(DSF), 26.iv.1958, Gudha, Rajasthan; 2♂(WSF), 1♀(WSF), 24.i.1971, Coimbatore, (Coll. Pradhan); 1♂ (WSF), 9.xii.1973, Baranagar, Gujarat, (Coll. P.T. Chenan); 1♂(WSF), 27.xi.1974, Bank of Saraswati River, Gujarat, (Coll. B. Datta); 1♂ (WSF), 2.vii.1999, Pora Chalana Forest, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, (Coll. Roy); 1♂ (WSF), 1♀, 4.vii.1999, Konar Veedu Reserve Forest, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, (Coll. Roy); 2♂, (WSF), 7.xii.2000, Yusufpur, Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, (M Prashad); 1♂(WSF), 1♂(WSF), 25.xi.2000, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, (Coll. M Prashad); 2♂(WSF), 17.i.2004, 1♂(WSF), Rangreddy, Andhra Pradesh, (Coll. Maulik); 2♂(WSF), 3♀, 10.iii.2006, Rambagh, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, (B. Biswas); 9♂(WSF), 1♀, 11.iii.2006, Samsabad, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, (Coll. B. Biswas); 1♂(WSF), 14.iii.2006, Pathouli, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, (Coll. B.G. Kundu); 1♂(WSF), 26. x. 2006, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, (Coll. A. Bal); 3♂(DSF), 1♀, 20. iii. 2008, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, (Coll. J. Kumar); 4♂(DSF), 23. iii.2008, Band Baretha, Rajasthan; 2♂(DSF), 5. ix. 2009, Dauri Bazar, Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, (Coll. N. Sharma); 4♂, 2♀, 2.v.2016, Taradevi, Himachal Pradesh, (Coll. Manpreet Kaur); 6♂, 2♀, 17.v.2018, Shanghar, Himachal Pradesh, (Coll. Manpreet Kaur).

Distribution India: Maharashtra, Karnataka, Uttarakhand, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Delhi, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Jammu & Kashmir, Chandigarh, Sikkim.

Global distribution: India, Tropical Africa, Madagascar.

Plate 3. A. Forewing, B. Hindwing, C. Female genitalia, D. Papilla analis.

Plate 4. Belenois aurota (Fabricius, 1793) WSF. A. Aedeagus, B. Male genitalia (Lateral view), C. Uncus (Dorsal view); Belenois aurota (Fabricius, 1793) DSF. D. Aedeagus, E. Male genitalia (Lateral view), F. Uncus (Dorsal view); Prioneris sita (Felder, 1865). G. Aedeagus, H. Male genitalia (Lateral view), I. Uncus (Dorsal view); Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) DSF. J. Aedeagus, K. Male genitalia (Lateral view), L. Uncus (Dorsal view); Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) WSF. M. Aedeagus, N. Male genitalia (Lateral view), O. Uncus (Dorsal view).




Remarks: Belenois aurota (Fabricius) is a common species in the above mentioned localities. The genitalic attributes of DSF and WSF are similar, but in DSF the base of the uncus is not wider as compared to WSF (Plate 1 & 2). The genitalia of both the seasonal forms have slight variation which cannot be considered as independent species. The genitalia of B. aurota (Fabricius) is also compared with the genitalia of the members of the genus Prioneris Wallace (Plate 4). In case of Belenois Drury, from lateral perspective the distal part of the uncus is dorsally humped, tegumen narrow, valve leaf-like with pointed distal tip and aedeagus is thin and linear whereas in Prioneris Wallace, from lateral perspective the distal part of the uncus is arched but not humped [slightly humped in Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday) DSF and WSF], tegumen broad, valve broad with blunt distal tip and aedeagus is broad with proximal part of suprazone arched [except in Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday) WSF] and distal part linear and serrated. 

Host Plants: Generally bred on Capers such as Capparis aphylla, C. sepiaria and C. heyneana. Haldhar etal., 2016 first report the B. aurota as a pest of Capparis decidua. Also bred on Cadaba indica and Maerua arenaria (Wynter-Blyth, 1957; Ghosh and Saha 2016). Other host plants are Cadaba farinosa, Capparis spinosa, Capparis zeylanica, Jasminum multiflorum and Maerua cylindrocarpa. (Gupta and Majumdar 2012).

Conclusion

Genus Belenois is one of the important group of butterflies under subfamily Pierinae. The species Belenois aurota has different seasonal forms which have been sorted on the basis of genitalic studies in the present work. The male genitalia of both the forms i.e. DSF and WSF and female genitalia of WSF of Belenois aurota (Fabricius) have been studied, illustrated and compared for the first time.


Future Scope

These studies can further be strengthened through molecular studies for sorting population variations in species complexes, and can further be taken up in other genera of subfamily Pierinae. Additionally, it can also be followed by phylogenetic studies. The representatives of family Pieridae are bio-indicators also so the relation between various climatic factors in an area and the presence of the Belenois butterflies can also be taken for future studies.

References

Antram, C. B. (1924). Butterflies of India. Thacker, Spink & Co., Calcutta and Shimla, pp.44.

Bhatnagar, S., Singh, S., Khan, A. U., Rathore, L. S., Sharma, N. and Imran (2022). Insect Visitor’s Diversity on Blossom of Acacia senegal (L.) Willd (Kumat) in Rajasthan, India. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(2), 896-904.

Bingham, C. L. (1907). The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, pp.453.

Chandra, H. (1985). Belenois aurota, Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) a Serious Pest of Kair (Capparis decidua) Plant. The Indian Forester, 111(7), 563-564.

Drury, D. (1773). Illustrations of the Natural History. Wherein are exhibited upwards of two hundred and forty figures of exotic insects. B. White, London, pp.6-8.

Evans, W. H. (1932). The identification of Indian Butterflies. The Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, India, 2nd ed., pp.454.

Gasse, P. V. (2013). Butterflies of India-Annotated Checklist. Retrieved from http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/checklists.

Ge, S. X., Hu, S. J., Shi, H. L., Han, F.Y., Li, M. J., Ren, L. L. (2021). The first record of the genus Belenois (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from China. Biodiversity Data Journal, 9, e61332.

Gehlot, L., Singh, M., Tanwar, B., Soni, M. and Bhadala, S. (2021). Sighting and Documentation of Butterflies and Moths (Lepidoptera: Insecta) from urban region of Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 13(1), 33-38.

Ghosh, S. and Saha, S. (2016). Seasonal diversity of butterflies with reference to habitat heterogeneity, larval host plants and nectar plants at Taki, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India. World Scientific News, 50, 197-238.

Gupta, I.J. and Majumdar, M. (2012). Handbook on diversity in some of the Indian Butterflies (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Published by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, pp.1-310.

Haldhar, M., Behere, G. T., Bhargava, R., Singh, R. S., Krishna, H., Jat, G. L. and Singh, D. (2016). Observations on the pioneer white butterfly, Belenois aurota (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Ker (Capparis deciduas) plant in Arid region of India. Indian Journal of Arid Horticulture, (1-2), 108-112.

Kehimkar, I. (2008). The Book of Indian Butterflies. BNHS, Oxford University. Delhi Press, pp.45.

Klots, A. B. (1931). Generic Revision of the Pieridae, together with a study of the male genitalia. Entomologica Americana, pp.139.

Klots, A. B. (1970). Lepidoptera. In: Tuxen SL (ed) Taxonomist’s glossary of genitalia in insects. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 2nd edn., pp.115-130.

Kumar, P., Parmar, B. and Kumar, P. (2023). Preliminary checklist of butterfly diversity from the Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, India. Environment Conservation Journal, 24(3), 215-221.

Kumari, K. and Thakur, A. K. (2022). Studies on the biodiversity of some families of butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) at Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. Biospectra, 17(1), 93-98. 

Kunte, K. (2006). Additions to known larval host plants of Indian butterflies. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 103, 119-120.

Moore, F. (1881). Lepidoptera of Ceylon. L. Reeve and Co., London, pp.137.

Noor, S., Ahmed, H. A., Mengal, F., Durrani, S., Rasheed, S., Abang, F. and Sani, I. A. (2018). An annotated list of the butterfly fauna of Quetta, Pakistan. Journal of the Entomology and Zoology Studies, 6(1), 771-777.

Paria, S., Ghosh, S., Mardaraj, P. C., Mallick, P. H., Chakraborty, S. K. (2018). Habitat heterogeneity and butterfly diversity of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha, India. Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management, 4(1), 93-104.

Robinson, G. S. (1976). The preparation of slides of Lepidoptera genitalia with special reference to the Microlepidoptera, Entomologists’ gazette, 27, 127–132.

Talbot, G. (1939). The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, pp.377.

Vane Wright, R. I. and de Jong, R. (2003). The butterflies of Sulawesi: annotated checklist for a critical island fauna, Zoologische Verhandelingen, 343, 3-267.

Varshney, R. K. and Smetacek, P. (2015). A Synoptic Catalogue of the Butterflies of India. Butterfly Research Centre, Bhimtal and Indinov Publishing, New Delhi, pp.261.

Wynter-Blyth, M. A. (1957). Butterflies of the Indian Region. Bombay Natural History Society, pp. 425.


How to cite this article

Manpreet Kaur, Jagbir Singh Kirti and Avtar Kaur Sidhu  (2024). Taxonomic Studies of the Species Belenois aurota (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from India. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(1): 231-238.