Author:
Renu1*, Raj Singh2, Anil Kumar3 and Mehak Nagora4
Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(7): 246-251, 2024
Address:
1Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Agricultural Meteorology, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India.
2Principal Scientist, Department of Agricultural Meteorology, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India.
3Assistant Scientist, Department of Agricultural Meteorology, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India.
4Assistant Scientist, Department of Agronomy, Regional Research Station, Bawal, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India.
(Corresponding author: Renu*)
DOI: -
A study was conducted during the Rabi season of 2021-22 at the Research Farm of the Department of Agricultural Meteorology, CCS HAU, Hisar (Latitude: 29°10′ N, Longitude: 75°46′ E, Altitude: 215.2 m). The study included four different sowing dates as the main plot treatments: D1 (November 16, 2021), D2 (November 23, 2021), D3 (November 29, 2021), and D4 (December 8, 2021). These were paired with five varieties as sub-plot treatments: V1 (HC 1), V2 (HC 3), V3 (HC 5), V4 (HC 6), and V5 (HC 7), using a split-plot design replicated three times. Temperature profiles showed a general decrease with height within the chickpea crop canopy, except at 3 PM on the 60 and 90 days after sowing (DAS), where temperatures increased with height. The highest temperatures were recorded at 3 PM due to heat absorption, while the lowest occurred at 9 AM. Overall, the highest temperatures in the profile were observed at 90 DAS across all treatments.
Chickpea, Temperature, Profile, Growing environments and Days after sowing.
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) a key legume crop globally and in South Asia, particularly India, widely cultivated for its nutritious seeds rich in protein, fiber, and essential minerals. Originating from the Middle East, it has been a staple in human diets for over 7,000 years (Zohary et al., 2012). Due to its ability to withstand drought and its propensity to grow in semi-arid conditions, chickpeas are an essential crop in areas with limited water resources (Varshney et al., 2014). It is a rich source of unsaturated fatty acids including linoleic acid and stigma sterol is profusely present in chickpea. Some vitamins like riboflavin, niacin, thymine and folate as well provided by chickpeas. Millions of the people in the world who cannot afford protein via animals or are vegetarians it serves as a cheap and readily available protein source (Yousef et al., 2020). The crop's capacity to fix atmospheric nitrogen and increase soil fertility makes it an important component of sustainable agriculture (Jukanti et al., 2012). The most crucial factor affecting its yield is the timing of sowing, which varies by variety and region due to different agro ecological conditions. Sowing dates influence the plant's growth stages by exposing it to varying levels of heat, solar radiation, and day length. Chickpea genotypes vary in their productivity, highlighting the necessity for further research on how different chickpea varieties respond to varying sowing dates to maximize yields in specific agro-climatic conditions (Pandey et al., 2014). Different sowing dates impact the crop's development by subjecting it to various temperatures and environmental conditions. . In the semi-arid tropics unfavorable soil surface temperatures have been reported to reduce seed germination, emergence and cause poor seedling establishment (Merga and Haji 2019). The temperature profile within a chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) crop canopy varies between the bottom and the top. Studying the temperature profile in chickpea crops is crucial for optimizing growth conditions and maximizing yield. Temperature significantly influences germination rates, seedling establishment, vegetative growth, and reproductive development in chickpeas. Understanding temperature variations within the crop canopy helps in selecting optimal sowing times and managing irrigation effectively. High temperatures during flowering and pod formation can reduce yields, while low temperatures can hinder germination, especially in kabuli varieties. The temperature profile in chickpea cultivation changes dramatically with plant height. Lower canopy levels experience more diurnal temperature changes, while higher canopy levels maintain more stable temperatures that impact plant development and physiological responses (Turner et al., 2001). Due to direct solar exposure, the temperature at the soil's surface tends to rise during the day, which affects germination and the early phases of growth (Toker, 2004).
Additionally, monitoring temperature profiles assists in managing soil moisture and predicting pest and disease outbreaks. Overall, an accurate understanding of the temperature profile in chickpea crops is essential for improving productivity and ensuring crop resilience. To investigate the significance of temperature in chickpea growth, so, the present investigation was undertaken to study the temperature profile within the chickpea canopy during daytime hours.
A field experiment was conducted in the University Research Farm, Department of Agricultural Meteorology, CCS HAU, Hisar during Rabi season of 2021-2022 which is located at latitude 29°10'N, longitude 75°46'E and altitude of 215.2 m above mean sea level. The main characteristics of climate in Hisar are dryness, extreme of temperature and scanty rainfall with very hot summers and relatively cool winters. The study was comprised of four sowing dates as main plot treatment viz., D1 (16th November ), D2 (23rd November 2021), D3 (29th November 2021) and D4 (8th December 2021) comprising five varieties as sub plot treatment viz., V1(HC 1), V2(HC 3), V3(HC 5), V4(HC 6) and V5(HC 7) in split plot design with three replications. The inter and intra row spacing was 30 × 10 cm and gross plot of size 6.0 m × 5.0 m and net plot of size 5.0 m × 3.6 m. Temperature profile were measured at 9:00 AM, 12:00 PM and 3:00 PM at two levels of crop canopy: top and bottom with the help of a Digital Psychrometer at 30, 60 and 90 days after sowing. By using the corresponding values temperature, profiles were drawn at 30, 60 and 90 DAS
The temperature profiles shown in Fig. 1 to 6 indicated that temperature profiles were lapse in nature i.e. decrease in temperature with height inside the crop canopy except at 3 PM at 60 DAS in D4 and at 90 DAS in which temperature increase with height. The temperature varied from the bottom to the top of the canopy among the treatments. The maximum temperature was observed at 3 PM and the minimum was at 9 AM. The maximum temperature recorded at 3 PM was (18.7°C, 17.2°C), (14.4°C, 12.9°C) (25.7°C, 26.6°C) in D1, (19.1°C, 18.3°C), (14.9°C,12.1°C), (24.3°C, 25.2°C) in D2, (18.5°C, 15.2°C), (18.8°C, 17.4°C), (24.4°C, 25.1°C) in D3 and (16.2°C, 15.3°C), (24.7°C, 25.4°C), (26.8°C, 27.7°C) in D4 at bottom and top of the crop at 30 DAS, 60DAS and 90 DAS, respectively.
Among varieties, the maximum temperature was also recorded at 3 PM was (18.0°C, 16.1°C), (18.1°C, 16.7°C), (25.6°C, 26.2°C) in V1 , (18.5°C, 16.5°C), (18°C,16.6°C), (25.1°C, 26.1°C) in V2, (17.8°C, 16.7°C), (18.4°C, 17.2°C), (25.2°C, 26.2°C) in V3, (18.1°C, 16.5°C), (18.3°C, 17.3°C), (25.0°C, 26.1°C) in V4 and (18.2°C, 16.6°C), (18.2°C, 17.2°C), (25.6°C, 26.1°C) in V5 at bottom and top of the crop at 30 DAS, 60DAS and 90 DAS, respectively.
The temperature profile at 90DAS revealed the greatest temperature among the treatments. The heat absorption caused the maximum temperature to be recorded at 3 PM. At 30 and 60 DAS, the temperature is higher at the base of the canopy because of heat absorption by the soil as a result of less canopy coverage, and it is lower at the top of the canopy because there is more actively green foliage present, which lowers the temperature there. Due to shading effects, the canopy base temperature is greater than the upper canopy but slightly lower than the soil surface just above it (Kashiwagi et al., 2008) and in upper canopy greater air circulation and less direct heat from the soil, the top canopy is cooler than the lower sections (Berger et al., 2011). At 90 DAS, the temperature profile was inverse in character, as greatest LAI caused more absorption of solar radiation by the upper canopy, resulting in high temperature at the top. Similar results were reported by Shamim et al. (2008); Tripathi et al. (2012); Singh et al. (2023) ; Painkra et al. (2024).
Fig. 1. Temperature profile (°C) of chickpea under different growing environments at 30 DAS during 2021-22.
Fig. 2. Temperature profile (°C) of different chickpea varieties at 30 DAS during 2021-22.
Fig. 3. Temperature profile (°C) of chickpea under different growing environments at 60 DAS during 2021-22.
Fig. 4. Temperature profile (°C) of different chickpea varieties at 60 DAS during 2021-22.
Fig. 5. Temperature profile (°C) of chickpea under different growing environments at 90 DAS during 2021-22.
Fig. 6. Temperature profile (°C) of different chickpea varieties at 90 DAS during 2021-22.
The crop of chickpeas has a bright future. It is acknowledge as a source of biologically active compounds and is already a staple diet in many Asian nations Studying temperature profiles in chickpea crops holds promise for developing climate-resilient varieties and optimizing agricultural practices through precision farming. It can refine yield predictions, improve pest and disease management, and enhance understanding of soil-plant interactions. Insights into temperature effects on phenology and genetics can accelerate cultivar development. Overall, these temperature profiles is crucial for optimizing crop management practices and improving chickpea yield.
Berger, J. D., Milroy, S. P., Turner, N. C., Siddique, K. H. M., Imtiaz, M. and Malhotra, R. (2011). Chickpea evolution has selected for contrasting phenological mechanisms among different habitats. Euphytica, 180(1), 1-15.
Jukanti, A. K., Gaur, P. M., Gowda, C. L. L. and Chibbar, R. N. (2012). Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. British Journal of Nutrition, 108(S1), S11-S26.
Kashiwagi, J., Krishnamurthy, L., Upadhyaya, H. D., Gaur, P. M. and Varshney, R. K. (2008). Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica, 165(1), 35-45.
Merga, B. and Haji, J. (2019). Economic importance of chickpea: Production, value, and world trade. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 5(1), 1615718.
Painkra, A., Shamim, M., Puranik, H., Ravisankar, N., Ghasal, P., Kashyap, P. and Dutta, D. (2024). Microclimatic study under wheat, mustard and chickpea crops in western plain zone of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Agrometeorology, 26(1), 25-31.
Pandey, K., Tyagi, K. and Shukla, C. (2014). Effect of sowing dates and varieties on yield attributes and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Rural and Agricultural Research, 14(2), 37-39.
Shamim, M., Singh, R. and Singh, D. (2008). Microclimatic profiles in soybean-pearl millet intercropping systems. Journal of Agrometeorology, 10(2), 151-157.
Singh, A., Khichar, M.L., Singh, J. and Ram, B. (2023). Microclimate: Diurnal Temperature Variation inside Crop Canopy of Pearl Millet under Different Sowing Environments. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(4), 118-131.
Toker, C. (2004). Evaluation of yield criteria for drought and heat resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190(4), 261-265.
Tripathi, M. K. and Rao, V. U. M. (2012). Air temperature and relative humidity profiles in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under various crop environments. Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences (An International Journal), 4(2), 121-128.
Turner, N. C., Wright, G. C. and Siddique, K. H. M. (2001). Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water-limited environments. European Journal of Agronomy, 15(2), 57-80.
Varshney, R. K., Thudi, M., Nayak, S. N. and Gaur, P. M. (2014). Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127(8), 445-462.
Yousef, F., Shafique, F., Ali, Q. and Malik, A. (2020). Effects of salt stress on the growth traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2020(1), 29.
Renu, Raj Singh, Anil Kumar and Mehak Nagora (2024). Temperature Profile in Chickpea Crop under Semi-Arid Region of Haryana. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 16(7): 246-251.