Studies on Growth Performance and Evaluation of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Genotypes for Seed Quality

Author:

Abha Shrivastava1*, R. Siddaraju2, Shantharaja C.S.3 and T.V. Krishna4

Journal Name: Biological Forum – An International Journal, 17(1): 27-35, 2025

Address:

1P.G. Research Scholar, Department of Seed Science and Technology, 

University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore (Karnataka), India.

2Professor and Head, Department of Seed Science and Technology, 

University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore (Karnataka), India.

3Scientist, Indian Institute of Seed Science, Mau (Regional Station), GKVK, Bengaluru (Karnataka), India.

4Assistant Professor, AICRP on Arid Legumes, ZARS, GKVK, Bengaluru (Karnataka), India.

 (Corresponding author: Abha Shrivastava*)


DOI: https://doi.org/10.65041/BiologicalForum.2025.17.1.4

PDF Download PDF

Abstract

Cowpea is a nutrient-rich crop providing affordable protein, nitrogen fixation, drought resistance, and adaptability to challenging environments. The study characterized cowpea germplasm lines based on seed traits, including colour, shape, and eye colour, revealing significant variation. ANOVA of seed quality parameters showed significant differences among genotypes, except for moisture content and mean seedling length. Genotype EC 075180 exhibited the highest 100-seed weight (18.70 g), NBC 51 the lowest moisture content (7.54%), and V-578 the highest germination (96%). Other superior genotypes included SUPER 30 recorded root length (22.72 cm), IC 97767(10) noticed shoot length (18.00 cm), NBC 016 showed mean seedling length (33.07 cm) and vigour index-I (2983), and EC 390287 with vigour index-II (3844). DC 15 recorded the lowest electrical conductivity (2.67), EC 075180 the highest dehydrogenase activity (3.98), and EC 492292 the highest protein content (29.93%). Controlled deterioration reduced germination and seedling vigour, but NBC 14 maintained higher germination (75.00), indicating better vigour under stress. These genotypes are recommended for breeding programs to enhance yield and seed quality under prevailing conditions.

Keywords

Cowpea, seed quality, controlled deterioration, germplasm, breeding program

Introduction

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) is annual herbaceous plant, cultivated for its leaves, green pods, grains and adaptability to diverse agro-climatic conditions. Because of the high protein content and superior biological value on a dry weight basis of the green leaves, cowpeas are sometimes referred to as "vegetable meat" or "poor man's meat." They also supply fibre, vitamins, and minerals. Additionally, it is grown as a green manure, fodder, cover, or catch crop. Cowpea grains have higher percentage of vital minerals than meat, fish, or eggs, including calcium (826 mg/kg) and iron (53.2 mg/kg), both of which are excellent for lowering blood cholesterol (Rangel et al., 2003; Achuba, 2006; Boukar et al., 2019). In India, the mean grain yields of cowpea are between 249 to 980kg/ha which is far less than the potential yield 3t per hectare elsewhere (Molosiwa et al., 2016). A major constraint to achieve this production of cowpea grains in the tropics and sub tropics is lack of high yielding cultivars and poor cultivation practices. Therefore, development of best performing, locally adaptable potential cultivars offer a simple and cost-effective method to produce higher yield. Seed quality traits are critical determinants of yield potential and crop performance, influencing germination, seedling vigour, and overall productivity. In cowpeas seed size is considered as an important trait as it directly influences productivity along with seed colours, which determine grain quality for marketing (Wirianto et al., 2024). Characterizing germplasm based on seed morphological and physiological traits provides essential insights for breeding programs. Seed colour, shape, and eye colour are key morphological descriptors that vary significantly across genotypes, reflecting genetic diversity. Physiological traits, including seed germination, vigour indices, protein content, and dehydrogenase activity, further highlight genotype-specific performance under different conditions. 

Although morphological and physiological traits are recognized as important, data on their variation across cowpea genotypes under stress conditions remains limited. This lack of information hinders the identification of genotypes with superior adaptive traits, which are crucial for improving crop performance. While previous studies have emphasized the importance of evaluating seed quality attributes, there is insufficient research on the response of cowpea genotypes to controlled deterioration-a key factor in simulating stress conditions (Sathya et al., 2023). To address this gap, this study aims to characterize cowpea germplasm lines based on seed traits and quality parameters, identify superior genotypes, and evaluate their performance under controlled deterioration. The findings will offer valuable insights for breeding programs focused on enhancing seed quality and yield potential, particularly under stress conditions.

Material & Methods

Seed material. The experiment was conduct in the laboratory of the department of seed science and technology, G.K.V.K. at University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore. 118 diverse germplasms along with two check varieties (C-152 and KBC-9) were evaluated for seed quality such as germination, seed moisture content, total dehydrogenase activity and protein content. Further, they were subjected to controlled deterioration test to study the effects of the ageing on the physiological statuses of seeds.

Seed morphological characterization. Seed traits of each genotype were observed at physiological maturity. Eye colour was recorded as tan brown, red, or black; seed colour as white, brown, red, or black; and seed shape as kidney, elliptical, or rhomboid. 

Hundred seed weight. Cleaning was done to remove the cracked, broken and abnormal seeds, other seeds, foreign matters, etc. by hand picking. Hundred seeds were counted from the harvested plants of each plot and were weighed and expressed in grams.

Standard germination test. The germination test was conducted as per ISTA guidelines in the laboratory by using between paper method (Anon., 2021). One hundred seeds are randomly selected from each genotype in three replications and placed equidistantly on the paper towel, they are further rolled and kept in a germination chamber with a temperature of 25 ± 1°C and Relative humidity of 90 per cent. The first count and the final count of the germinated seedlings was taken on the 5th and 8th day respectively and the percentage of germination was expressed based on the number of normal seedlings present.

Seed germination = [No. of normal seedlings/No. of seed put for germination] × 100

Shoot length, root length and mean seedling length. From the standard germination test, shoot length (collar region to shoot tip), root length (collar region to primary root tip), and seedling length (primary root tip to apical shoot tip) were measured on ten randomly selected normal seedlings per genotype replication. Measurements were taken on the final count day and expressed as mean lengths in centimetres.

Seedling dry weight. Ten normal seedlings used for shoot and root length measurements were dried in a hot air oven at 80°C for 17 ± 1 hour, cooled in desiccators for 45 minutes, and weighed. The mean seedling dry weight was expressed in milligrams (mg).

Seedling vigour indices. Seedling vigour indices were calculated following (Abdul-Baki and Anderson 1973). Vigour index-I and Vigour index-II were computed as

Vigour index-I = Germination (%) × [Root + Shoot length (cm)]

Vigour index-II = Germination (%) × Mean seedling dry weight (mg)

Seed moisture content. Seed moisture content (%) was determined using the oven-dry method (Anon., 1985). Five grams of seeds were dried in aluminium cups at 103°C for 17 hours, and then cooled in desiccators for 30 minutes before weighing. The moisture content was calculated using the formula:

Seed moisture content (%) = [M2 - M3] / [M2 - M1]× 100

Where, M1 = The weight of the container with its lid; M2 = The weight of the container with its lid and seeds before drying; M3 = The weight of the container with lid and seeds after drying.

Electrical conductivity (μS/cm/gm). Twenty-five seeds from each genotype replication were soaked in 25 ml distilled water for 24 hours at 25 ± 1°C. The electrical conductivity (EC) of the seed leachate was measured using a digital conductivity meter (Model: Systronic 306), adjusted by subtracting the EC of distilled water, and expressed in μS/cm/gm (Anon., 2021).

Total Dehydrogenase (TDH) activity (A480). The seed coats of 10 seeds of each genotype in three replications were removed, and the embryonic axes were soaked in 0.5% tetrazolium chloride solution, incubated at 25 ± 1°C in the dark for 4 hours. After thorough washing, the red formazan from stained embryos was eluted in 5 ml of 2-methoxy ethanol for 24 hours in an airtight container. The extract was decanted, and color intensity was measured at A480 using a spectrophotometer. Dehydrogenase activity was expressed as optical density at A480 (Perl et al., 1978).

Seed protein content. The total soluble protein content (%) was estimated as per the method prescribed by Lowry et al. (1951). Reagent solutions included sodium carbonate (Solution A), sodium potassium tartarate (1.35%), copper sulphate (5.5%), and Folin Ciocalteu reagent (FCR, 1:1 dilution). Solution C (A + B) was prepared fresh, and BSA served as the standard. 100 mg of dried sample was extracted with 0.1M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), centrifuged, and the supernatant was reacted with reagents, incubated, and absorbance was recorded at 660 nm. Protein content was calculated using a BSA standard curve and expressed as a percentage.

Adjustment of Seed Moisture Content for CD. After determining the initial seed moisture content (SMC). The moisture content of the seeds was adjusted to the desired value based on the ISTA (Anon., 2017 by using the formula.

W2 = [100 – A] × [W1/100 – B]

Where, A = initial seed moisture content (%), B = desired seed moisture content (%), W1 = initial weight of the seeds (g), W2 = final weight of the seeds with desired moisture content (g)

Seeds of each replication imbibed on a moist germination /filter paper, placed in a suitable container.

Controlled Deterioration test. Once seeds have reached the required weight, each replication was placed in sealed aluminium foil packed and equilibrated at 4°C overnight to ensure an even distribution of moisture. Seeds package was then placed in a plastic envelope, allowing no ingression of water, and kept in a water bath at ±40°C for up to 24hr ± 15min.  After which routine germination test is followed, only number of normal seedlings were and expressed as the percentage of germination. 

Statistical Analysis. The statistical analysis and interpretation of the experimental data for controlled deterioration test was done by using Fisher’s method of Analysis of Variance technique as outlined by Gomez and Gomez (1984). The level of significance used in ‘F’ and ‘t’ tests was at five per cent. Critical difference values were calculated wherever F test was significant.

Results & Discussion

Seed morphological characterization. Cowpea germplasm lines were characterized based on seed colour, shape, and eye colour. Variations included 19 lines with white seeds, 24 with red, 4 with black, and 73 with brown (Fig. 1). Tan brown seed eye colour was observed in 92 lines, red in 15, and black in 13. Seed shapes were elliptical (48 lines), rhomboid (41), and kidney-shaped (31) (Table 2). Kabas et al. (2007) reported diverse seed coat colours, including white, cream, green, buff, red, brown, and black in cowpea. Henshaw (2008) noted various seed coat textures and shapes like kidney, rhomboid, ovoid, globose, and crowder.

Hundred seed weight. Cowpea genotypes and checks showed significant differences in 100-seed weight. Genotype EC-075180 recorded the highest weight (18.70 g), while among checks, KBC 9 had a higher seed index (10.67 g) (Table 3). This variation is attributed to genetic variability, efficient photosynthesis, and nutrient distribution during seed filling. Similar findings were reported by Peksen et al. (2004).

Seed germination. The primary objective of seed production is to achieve high germination rates. According to minimum seed certification standards, cowpea seeds should have at least 75 per cent germination. In this study, all cowpea genotypes exceeded this threshold. Seed germination varied significantly among different genotypes and checks. Genotype V- 578 recorded the highest seed germination (96.00 %) (Table 3). The high germination percentages may be attributed to genetic traits, water use efficiency, and nutrient uptake, which contribute to increased storage of food reserves that are utilized during germination and plant growth (Ranjitha et al., 2016). A similar effect of variety on seed germination and its components was observed by Olasoji et al. (2013).

Seed moisture content. Seed moisture content of different genotypes and checks resulted in non-significant difference for seed moisture content. Minimum moisture content was recorded in genotype NBC 51 (7.54 %), while maximum moisture content was recorded in genotype GW HOPE (11.29 %). Whereas, among checks C 152 recorded minimum moisture content (8.41 %) (Table 3). Similar results were reported by Ranasingh et al. (2021).

Shoot length, root length and mean seedling length. The shoot length varied significantly, with IC 97767(10) recording the highest (18.00 cm), followed by NBC 24 (15.50 cm), and IC 45061 with the lowest (6.34 cm). Root length also varied significantly, with SUPER 30 having the longest (22.72 cm), followed by C 33 (22.34 cm), and PMCP1131 the shortest (6.82 cm). Mean seedling length showed no significant variation; however, NBC 016 had the highest (33.07 cm), Overall, IC 97767(10) excelled in shoot length, SUPER 30 in root length, and NBC 016 in total seedling length, indicating its potential for breeding programs due to its balanced growth.

Seedling dry weight. Significant variation was observed, with EC 390287 recording the highest (43.27 mg), followed by CP 98 (41.97 mg), and GW HOPE the lowest (26.52 mg). Among checks, KBC 9 had the highest mean dry weight (36.20 mg). 

Seedling vigour indices. Seedling vigour index-I showed no significant differences, with NBC 016 recording the highest value (2983), driven by high germination percentage and mean seedling length. Seedling vigour index-II varied significantly, with EC 390287 achieving the highest value (3844), followed by CP-98 (3747), and GW HOPE the lowest (2364). KBC 9 also excelled among checks (3222), attributed to high germination percentage and mean seedling dry weight (Table 3).

Electrical conductivity (μS/cm/gm). The electrical conductivity  (mScm-¹g-¹) of cowpea genotypes, varied significantly. DC-15 recorded the lowest conductivity (2.67), followed by IC 402159 (3.34), while PCP 1124-1 had the highest (8.99). Among checks, C 152 exhibited the lowest value (4.13) (Table 3). Electrical conductivity, a sensitive indicator of seed quality, negatively correlates with other quality traits, as noted by Hibbard and Miller (1928); Natarajaratnam et al. (1987).

Total dehydrogenase activity (A480nm). Genotype EC- 075180 showed the highest TDH activity (3.98) whereas among the checks, KBC 9 exhibited the highest dehydrogenase activity (2.24) (Table 3). The increased total dehydrogenase activity could be attributed to the high vigour of seeds, which contain more active, living cells, supporting better germination and growth. Similar results were reported by Basu and Parida (2023).

Protein content (%). The significant variation in total seed protein content among genotypes and checks can be attributed to genetic differences, environmental factors, and the interaction between them. Genotype EC- 492292 exhibited the highest protein concentration of 29.93 per cent, indicating it possess genetic traits that enhance protein synthesis and accumulation during seed development (Table 3). Variations in physiological processes, such as nitrogen metabolism and storage protein synthesis, may also contribute to these differences across genotypes and checks. Similar findings were reported by Guo et al. (2022).

Controlled Deterioration (CD) Test. Under controlled deterioration, the percentage of normal seedlings and germination rate significantly declined at the (5%) level, decreasing from 90.88 per cent in NBC 14 to 75.00 per cent after 24 hours, (48%) after 48 hours, and (24%) after 72 hours. Similarly, NBC 12 showed an initial germination rate of (91.83%), dropping to (60%) in 24 hours, 41 per cent in 48 hours, and 25 per cent in 72 hours (Table 4) (Fig. 2). As the ageing conditions intensified, with seed moisture content increasing to (20%) and the ageing period extending from 0 to 3 days, the decline in the percentage of normal seedlings followed a corresponding pattern. The decline was also prominent in all other 15 cowpea genotypes, though their magnitude were overall less in NBC 14 this can be due to higher 100 seed weight (13.64 gm), high germination (90.88%) and genetic factor. Similar findings were reported by Khan et al. (2015).

Table 1: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for seed quality parameters in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) genotypes.

Sr. No.

Character

Mean sum of square

Genotype

Error

1.

Hundred seed weight

5.42*

2.34

2.

Moisture content

0.99ns

0.82

3.

Germination percentage

110.23*

31.99

4.

Shoot length

7.16*

5.58

5.

Root length

17.27*

2.97

6.

Mean seedling length

10.60ns

8.75

7.

Mean seedling dry weight

43.30*

8.52

8.

Vigour index I

117488.60*

35043.50

9.

Vigour index II

351996.90*

8699.45

10.

Electrical conductivity (dScm-1 g-1)

1.51*

0.31

11.

Total dehydrogenase activity (A480nm)

0.71*

0.32

12.

Protein content (%)

15.21*

2.43

13.

Controlled deterioration

4070.09*

62.31

ns P > 0.05; * P <= 0.05

Fig. 1. Variation in seed colour of distint cowpe genotypes.

Table 2: Characterization of cowpea germplasm for seed quality traits.

Sr. No.

No. of genotype

Character

Germplasm







1.


Seed colour


19

White

NBC 12, EC 170584, EC 458490, EC 458489, IC 402162, PCP1124-1, PMCP1131, IC 4506, NBC 38, NBC 8, PCP030601, V 604-7-3, EC 458430, VCP 17091, IC 402184, NBC 15, IC 58905, IC 603187, IT 9715497-38


24


Red

V 578, TOME 774, NBC 27, GP 154, 27749(20), 97767(10), C 33, C 720, CB 10, CP 98, EC 472257, EC 472267, EC 492292, GC 1602, NBC 19, NBC 23, NBC 24, IC 402106, IC 402114, EC 458411, EC 458430, IC 402172, IC 402180, IC 402135




73




Brown

C 152, KBC 9, 198355(45), 201095(32), 202329-89, 202521(93), 202804(83), 202854(97), 2574422(7), CPD 15, CPD 340, DC 15, EC 075180, EC 170584, EC 271040, EC 390287, EC 394779, EC 458438, EC 458440, KBC 2, KM 5, NBC 016, NBC 12, NBC 14, NBC 15, NBC 18, EC 458442, EC 458473, EC 458483, EC 458489, EC 458490, EC 458805, EC 472250, GC 1801, GC 1805, SUPER 30, NBC 68, NBC 8, NBC 98, TPTC-29, GC 3 (R), GC 810, GP 154, GW HOPE, IC 1070, IC 1071, IC 198326, IC 202290, IC 202325, IC 202711(58), IC 202777, IC 202781, IC 202792(72), IC 20287(99), IC 206240, IC 219489, IC 249588, IC 402125, IC 249593, IC 253251, IC 259105, IC 458470, IC 458485, IC 330996, IC 394708, IC 402048, IC 402098, IC 402101, IC 402104, IC 402159, IC 402162, IC 402164, IC 402166,

4

Black

G 36, NBC 25, NBC 40, IC 402090






2.


Eye colour






92





Tan Brown

C 152, KBC 9, 202329-89, 202521(93), 202804(83), C 720, CB 10, CP 98, CPD 15, CPD 340, IT 9715497-38, KBC 2, KM 5, NBC 016, NBC 12, DC 15, EC 075180, EC 170584, EC 271040, EC 390287, EC 394779, EC 458411, EC 458430, EC 458438, EC 458440, EC 458442, EC 458473, EC 458483, EC 458489, NBC 27, NBC 32, NBC 33, NBC 36, NBC 38, PCP 0306 01, PCP 1124-1, PMCP 1131, SUPER 30, TOME 774, TPTC-29, V 240, V 578, V 585, V 604-7-3, VCP 17091, IC 402184, EC 458490, EC 458805, EC 472250, EC 472257, EC 472267, EC 492292, IC 202711(58), IC 202777, IC 202781, IC 202792(72), IC 20287(99), IC 206240, IC 219489, IC 249588, IC 249593, IC 253251, IC 259105, IC 330996, IC 394708, IC 402048, IC 402090, IC 402098, IC 402101, IC 402135, IC 402159, IC 402162, IC 402164, IC 402166, IC 402172, IC 402180, IC 4506, IC 45061, IC 458470, IC 458485, IC 58905

15

Red

GP 154, NBC 27, NBC 15, IC 4506, 202854(97), 2574422(7), 27749(20), 97767(10), IC 603187, IC 402104, IC 402106, IC 402114, IC 402125, NBC 14, NBC 23

13

Black

G 36, GC 1602, C 457, NBC 25, NBC 40, C33, NBC 8, NBC 98, 198355(45), 201095(32), IC 198326, IC 202290, IC 202325



Seed shape






3.


31


Kidney

C 152, 202854(97), 2574422(7), 27749(20), 97767(10), C 33, C 720, CB 10, CP 98, CPD 15, CPD 340, EC 458490, EC 458805, EC 472250, EC 472257, EC 472267, EC 492292, G 36, GC 1602, GC 1801, GC 1805, IC 402090, IC 402098, IC 402101, IC 402104, IC 402106, IC 402114, IC 402125, IC 402135, IC 402159, IC 402162



48



Elliptical

KBC 9, 198355(45), 201095(32), 202329-89, 202521(93), 202804(83), DC 15, EC 075180, GC 3 (R), GC 810, GP 154, GW HOPE, IC 1070, IC 1071, IC 198326, IC 202290, IC 202325, IC 202711(58), IC 202777, IC 202781, IC 202792(72), IC 20287(99), IC 206240, IC 458470, IC 458485, IC 58905, IC 603187, IT 9715497-38, KBC 2, KM 5, NBC 016, NBC 12, NBC 14, NBC 15, NBC 18, NBC 19, NBC 23, NBC 24, NBC 98, PCP 0306 01, PCP 1124-1, PMCP 1131, SUPER 30, TOME 774, TPTC-29, V 240, V 578, V 585



41



Rhomboid

EC 170584, EC 271040, EC 390287, EC 394779, EC 458411, EC 458430, EC 458438, EC 458440, EC 458442, EC 458473, EC 458483, EC 458489, IC 219489, IC 249588, IC 249593, IC 253251, IC 259105, IC 330996, IC 394708, IC 402048, IC 402164, IC 402166, IC 402172, IC 402180, IC 4506, IC 45061, NBC 25, NBC 27, NBC 32, NBC 33, NBC 36, NBC 38, NBC 40, NBC 4716, NBC 51, NBC 6, NBC 68, NBC 8, V 604-7-3, VCP 17091, IC 402184

Table 3: Hundred seed weight, moisture content, seed germination, seedling vigour index (I&II), electrical conductivity, total dehydrogenase activity and protein content of cowpea germplasms.

Genotype No.

Genotype

Hundred seed weight (g)

Moisture content

(%)

Seed germination (%)

Seedling vigour index-I

Seedling vigour index-II


Electrical conductivity (dScm-1 g-1)

Total dehydrogenase activity (A480)

Protein content (%)

G1

C 152 (check 1)

10.35

8.41

90.03

2604

3068

4.13

1.95

22.04

G2

KBC 9 (check 2)

10.69

9.13

89.76

2614

3222

4.16

2.24

22.66

G3

IC 198355(45)

9.87

9.20

89.09

2615

3033

3.64

2.09

21.79

G4

IC 201095(32)

10.12

8.95

89.98

2621

3137

3.80

2.05

22.18

G5

IC 202329-89

11.12

8.51

88.90

2726

3043

4.34

1.76

21.79

G6

IC 202521(93)

11.13

8.77

88.46

2823

3108

3.73

2.09

22.03

G7

IC 202804(83)

11.58

9.21

89.79

2618

2907

4.27

2.65

22.74

G8

IC 202854(97)

11.94

8.62

88.41

2485

2804

3.90

2.40

22.61

G9

IC 2574422(7)

11.38

8.48

88.41

2639

3079

4.79

2.16

21.87

G10

IC 27749(20)

10.90

9.00

88.94

2712

3227

3.54

1.54

21.30

G11

IC 97767(10)

13.39

9.11

90.00

2713

3246

3.77

1.74

22.95

G12

C 33

11.58

8.97

89.09

2354

3472

4.23

2.25

21.67

G13

C 720

11.39

7.98

90.71

2650

3707

4.58

1.77

22.47

G14

CB 10

11.67

9.20

89.90

2750

3348

4.00

2.11

21.96

G15

CP 98

11.84

9.42

89.94

2754

3747

4.25

1.65

21.76

G16

CPD 15

9.64

8.63

88.69

2583

3458

4.31

2.04

22.66

G17

CPD 340

9.79

9.59

88.98

2698

3482

4.17

1.80

21.61

G18

DC 15

10.61

9.23

89.29

2629

3338

2.67

2.02

21.10

G19

EC 075180

18.70

9.01

89.92

2585

3625

3.98

3.80

22.60

G20

EC 170584

10.56

8.98

88.68

2190

3613

4.60

2.39

21.25

G21

EC 271040

11.69

9.45

89.89

2651

3256

3.68

1.72

21.73

G22

EC 390287

11.78

8.06

89.49

2630

3844

4.55

2.14

22.56

G23

EC 394779

12.17

8.92

89.33

2633

3420

4.25

1.81

21.98

G24

EC 458411

10.27

8.42

89.83

2663

2970

3.97

2.30

22.98

G25

EC 458430

11.66

8.58

89.55

2714

3205

4.25

2.05

24.73

G26

EC 458438

11.86

8.69

89.20

2640

2913

3.75

2.15

24.09

G27

EC 458440

11.37

9.05

88.67

2604

3067

4.09

1.63

23.52

G28

EC 458442

11.81

8.73

88.34

2582

3012

4.35

2.18

23.36

G29

EC 458473

8.01

8.29

88.32

2653

2745

4.14

1.62

24.92

G30

EC 458483

10.02

8.38

89.93

2621

2817

4.02

2.05

23.93

G31

EC 458489

10.13

9.06

88.52

2567

3058

3.96

1.97

24.90

G32

EC 458490

10.37

8.65

88.57

2448

2870

4.43

2.05

25.32

G33

EC 458805

10.97

8.97

90.00

2702

2826

3.66

2.46

25.15

G34

EC 472250

10.34

8.18

89.34

2693

3042

4.25

1.55

25.02

G35

EC 472257

9.82

8.81

88.36

2687

3101

3.57

1.95

24.64

G36

EC 472267

11.12

8.45

89.52

2694

2984

4.09

2.10

24.76

G37

EC 492292

11.48

10.13

89.65

2307

2966

4.45

2.02

29.93

G38

G 36

11.92

8.86

87.94

2723

2915

3.64

2.04

24.4

G39

GC 1602

10.45

9.02

89.23

2577

2975

3.98

2.34

23.33

G40

GC 1801

10.10

8.97

88.54

2483

2867

3.83

2.05

23.46

G41

GC 1805

9.92

8.97

89.66

2592

2921

3.57

1.60

25.09

G42

GC 3 (R)

10.74

9.42

88.27

2328

3055

4.01

1.73

24.15

G43

GC 810

10.63

8.70

88.37

2488

2933

4.16

2.06

23.85

G44

GP 154

10.31

9.49

87.75

2335

3043

3.83

1.87

24.76

G45

GW HOPE

10.79

11.29

90.17

2547

2364

3.76

2.04

23.46

G46

IC 1070

10.27

8.09

89.83

2637

2428

3.73

2.55

25.53

G47

IC 1071

10.12

8.47

89.09

2563

2439

3.84

1.69

24.65

G48

IC 198326

11.14

9.25

89.82

2522

2484

4.35

1.35

24.64

G49

IC 202290

10.30

8.64

89.31

2610

2448

4.23

1.81

24.86

G50

IC 202325

11.21

8.51

88.59

2669

2547

4.04

1.73

25.52

G51

IC 202711(58)

10.55

8.02

88.98

2645

2480

3.91

2.19

24.02

G52

IC 202777

10.28

8.97

89.83

2611

2490

4.60

1.84

24.72

G53

IC 202781

10.64

8.99

89.50

2570

2407

6.35

2.01

24.81

G54

IC 202792(72)

9.75

8.82

88.64

2761

2467

4.37

2.10

24.00

G55

IC 20287(99)

10.65

8.77

89.82

2487

2484

4.09

2.24

23.52

G56

IC 206240

10.97

8.99

90.2

2814

2376

3.97

1.88

24.24

G57

IC 219489

10.46

8.23

89.94

2608

2404

4.08

2.04

24.09

G58

IC 249588

10.98

9.49

90.33

2569

3132

3.77

2.17

23.91

G59

IC 249593

10.49

8.10

90.20

2730

3175

3.43

1.84

20.05

G60

IC 253251

10.53

8.83

89.17

2775

3001

4.15

2.40

22.37

G61

IC 259105

8.72

9.02

89.43

2599

3098

4.39

2.06

20.67

G62

IC 330996

9.96

8.52

88.32

2530

2960

3.96

1.92

19.76

G63

IC 394708

11.45

9.04

89.66

2470

3270

4.60

2.39

19.92

G64

IC 402048

10.67

10.38

89.25

2572

3145

4.46

1.97

21.27

G65

IC 402090

11.27

8.83

92.51

2737

3176

4.44

2.15

22.46

G66

IC 402098

11.12

8.94

91.61

2636

3272

4.31

2.13

23.01

G67

IC 402101

11.27

8.72

92.54

2561

3191

3.87

1.72

21.1

G68

IC 402104

10.39

8.12

93.34

2933

3304

4.36

1.93

21.63

G69

IC 402106

10.38

8.27

92.45

2954

3153

4.11

1.74

20.43

G70

IC 402114

10.19

8.89

91.68

2634

3100

3.60

1.55

20.63

G71

IC 402125

11.17

8.35

92.4

2737

3085

4.07

1.87

19.71

G72

IC 402135

9.93

8.50

91.83

2660

3405

4.00

2.32

19.96

G73

IC 402159

10.50

9.29

93.52

2749

3361

3.34

2.46

19.98

G74

IC 402162

8.13

8.19

92.99

2706

3242

4.46

2.06

20.00

G75

IC 402164

10.78

8.94

93.07

2548

3239

3.85

1.75

20.79

G76

IC 402166

10.57

8.99

92.13

2899

3430

4.18

1.75

20.77

G77

IC 402172

10.70

9.62

92.06

2775

2978

4.11

2.21

20.82

G78

IC 402180

10.04

8.63

92.70

2788

3073

3.95

1.98

21.84

G79

IC 4506

9.22

8.43

93.09

2866

3013

3.67

2.30

20.43

G80

IC 45061

10.15

9.94

92.36

2675

3201

3.61

2.32

19.89

G81

IC 458470

11.39

9.77

91.28

2663

3199

3.98

2.16

21.52

G82

IC 458485

10.78

9.27

93.50

2935

2985

4.13

1.46

21.22

G83

IC 58905

11.86

9.51

91.71

2624

2982

4.05

2.34

13.34

G84

IC 603187

10.52

9.07

92.59

2687

3182

4.26

2.01

21.07

G85

IT 9715497-38

10.60

8.67

92.42

2798

3068

4.07

2.32

21.30

G86

KBC 2

12.60

8.01

92.52

2581

3164

3.77

2.08

21.34

G87

KM 5

10.39

8.79

92.32

2864

3296

4.21

2.01

19.40

G88

NBC 016

9.75

8.78

92.50

2983

3286

3.90

1.54

21.13

G89

NBC 12

13.42

7.97

91.83

2959

3144

3.84

1.67

21.73

G90

NBC 14

13.65

8.26

90.88

2905

2995

3.86

1.87

21.72

G91

NBC 15

11.30

8.20

92.57

2782

3228

3.74

2.06

22.16

G92

NBC 18

10.73

8.85

92.01

2838

3099

4.00

2.06

20.29

G93

NBC 19

12.23

8.45

91.68

2651

3131

4.15

1.63

20.61

G94

NBC 23

11.85

9.26

92.02

2606

3110

3.96

1.83

21.26

G95

NBC 24

11.94

9.33

91.82

2613

3210

4.04

2.13

21.99

G96

NBC 25

10.80

9.25

93.24

2701

3025

4.19

1.42

20.44

G97

NBC 27

11.01

9.22

92.88

2746

3036

4.66

1.90

20.70

G98

NBC 32

10.21

9.16

93.27

2665

3344

4.43

1.75

22.05

G99

NBC 33

11.34

7.88

92.21

2834

3435

3.81

2.42

20.23

G100

NBC 36

11.29

8.69

92.75

2852

3180

3.69

1.81

20.58

G101

NBC 38

11.29

9.65

94.38

2724

3231

3.93

1.99

22.50

G102

NBC 40

11.77

9.27

91.73

2859

3254

3.44

2.71

20.92

G103

NBC 4716

11.32

8.85

92.46

2648

3351

4.16

2.04

21.29

G104

NBC 51

11.66

7.54

92.71

2752

3212

4.33

2.23

20.19

G105

NBC 6

11.90

9.71

92.10

2655

2955

4.00

2.66

21.96

G106

NBC 68

11.55

10.47

93.59

2982

3408

4.50

1.96

22.51

G107

NBC 8

12.04

8.37

92.89

2569

3191

3.71

1.53

19.99

G108

NBC 98

11.89

8.62

92.52

2492

3360

4.27

1.83

21.66

G109

PCP 0306 01

10.62

7.67

94.89

2728

3291

3.82

1.76

21.39

G110

PCP 1124-1

10.94

9.16

94.16

2740

3204

8.99

2.01

19.16

G111

PMCP 1131

10.94

9.18

94.75

2689

3293

3.99

2.45

20.18

G112

SUPER 30

11.46

8.87

95.37

2831

3416

4.18

1.99

21.13

G113

TOME 774

10.14

9.11

94.82

2660

3226

4.11

2.31

20.40

G114

TPTC-29

9.96

9.50

94.34

2793

3090

3.99

2.04

21.53

G115

V 240

9.32

8.67

92.63

2578

3107

3.45

2.44

20.70

G116

V 578

17.12

8.49

96.00

2888

3387

4.40

2.07

21.52

G117

V 585

10.95

8.56

93.97

2823

3124

4.54

1.92

20.25

G118

V 604-7-3

11.13

9.06

95.31

2860

3366

4.17

2.00

21.85

G119

VCP 17091

10.92

9.32

95.00

1598

3209

4.01

1.68

21.80

G120

IC 402184

10.84

8.17

93.94

2687

3315

3.70

2.19

20.45

Mean

10.93

8.88

90.98

2661

3094

4.10

2.03

22.15

SEm±

0.73

0.46

0.73

93.60

46.64

0.28

0.29

0.78

CD (p=0.05)

2.04

1.27

2.04

260.32

129.70

0.77

0.79

2.17

CV (%)

1.62

3.26

4.62

4.03

3.01

3.59

3.13

4.05

Table 4: Seed germination of better performing cowpea (Vgina unguiculata (L.) Walp) genotype after controlled deterioration test.

Genotype No.

Genotype

Seed germination (%)

Initial

After 24 hr

After 48 hr

After 72 hr

G90

NBC 14

90.88

75

48

24

G89

NBC 12

91.83

60

41

25

G93

NBC 19

91.68

63

38

23

G88

NBC 016

92.50

56

49

19

G69

IC 402106

92.45

67

37

28

G38

G 36

87.96

64

44

24

G2

KBC 9

89.76

60

43

28

G19

EC 075180

89.92

56

48

21

G119

VCP 17091

95.00

53

35

29

G118

V 604-7-3

95.31

65

32

21

G116

V 578

96.00

57

42

26

G112

SUPER 30

95.37

60

46

20

G11

97767(10)

90.00

63

36

29

G105

NBC 6

92.10

54

31

18

G1

C 152

90.03

65

48

16

Mean

61.2

41.2

23.4

SEm±

2.04

CD (p=0.05)

2.82

CV (%)

4.87

Fig. 2. Germination percentage of better performing cowpea genotypes after controlled deterioration test.

Conclusion

Key findings included superior performance by genotypes EC 075180, NBC 51, and V 578 for quality traits such as hundred-seed weight, moisture content, and germination rate, respectively. Genotypes like SUPER 30, IC 97767(10), NBC 016, and EC 390287 excelled in parameters like root length, shoot length, seedling vigour indices, and seedling dry weight. Under controlled deterioration, NBC 14 demonstrated higher germination after stress conditions, showcasing its potential for stress tolerance and suitability for breeding programs aimed at improving seed vigour under challenging environments. In conclusion, these genotypes exhibit significant potential for maximizing yields and producing superior-quality seeds. They can serve as valuable parental lines for breeding programs targeting enhanced productivity and adaptability to varied growing conditions.

Future Scope

The results give scope for improvement of cowpea breeding and seed quality. The morphological diversity, high germination with V-578, highest seed weight with EC- 075180 and maximum protein content with EC- 492292, present the prospects for breeding for high yielding, nutrient rich verities. Genotype superior in seedling vigour with (IC-97767(10), SUPER 30) can impart better early growth. Indicators of seed quality such as electrical conductivity and dehydrogenase activity support efficient screening, but controlled deterioration tests provide information toward the development of genotypes with better storage potential. Genetic and physiological studies coupled with advanced tools like marker-assisted selection and genomic studies can accelerate the development of robust, high-quality varieties of cowpea specifically tailored to diverse agro-climatic conditions towards sustainable agriculture and food security.

References

Abdul-Baki, A. A. & Anderson, J. G. (1973). Vigour determination in soybean seeds by multiple criteria. Crop Science, 13(6), 630-633.

Achuba, F. I. (2006). The effect of sublethal concentrations of crude oil on the growth and metabolism of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seedlings. Environmentalist, 26(1), 17-20.

Anonymous (1985). International rules for seed testing (ISTA). Seed Science and Technology, 13(1), 299-355.

Anonymous (2017). International rules for seed testing (ISTA). Seed Science and Technology, 14(1), 240-267.

Anonymous (2021). International rules for seed testing (ISTA). Seed Science and Technology, 24(1), 307-335.

Basu, U. & Parida, S. K. (2023). The developmental dynamics in cool-season legumes with a focus on chickpea. Plant Molecular Biology, 111(6), 473-491.

Boukar, O., Belko, N., Chamarthi, S., Togola, A., Batieno, J., Owusu, E., Haruna, M., Diallo, S., Umar, M. L., Olufajo, O. & Fatokun, C. (2019). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata): Genetics, genomics and breeding. Plant Breeding, 138(4), 415-424.

Gomez, K. A. & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd ed.). Wiley-Interscience.

Guo, B., Sun, L., Jiang, S., Ren, H., Sun, R., Wei, Z., Hong, H., Luan, X., Wang, J., Wang, X. & Xu, D. (2022). Soybean genetic resources contributing to sustainable protein production. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 135(11), 4095-4121.

Henshaw, F. O. (2008). Varietal differences in physical characteristics and proximate composition of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(3), 302-306.

Hibbard, R. P. & Miller, J. V. (1928). Biochemical studies on seed viability, measurement of conductance and reduction. Plant Physiology, 3(1), 335-352.

Kabas, O., Yilmaz, E., Ozmerzi, A. & Akinci, I. (2007). Some physical and nutritional properties of cowpea seed (Vigna sinensis L.). Journal of Food Engineering, 79(4), 1405-1409.

Khan, A. M., Khan, H. & Khan, R. (2015). Vigor tests used to rank seed lot quality and predict field emergence in wheat. American Journal of Plant Physiology, 2(1), 311-317.

Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193(1), 265-275.

Molosiwa, O. O., Chiyapo, G., Joshuah, M. & Stephen, M. C. (2016). Phenotypic Variation in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) Germplasm Collection from Botswana. Int. J. Biodiver. Conserv., 8(7), 153–163.

Natarajaratnam, N., Rao, T. V. & Pathmanabhan, G. (1987). Seed and seedling physiology of cowpea genotypes. Madras Agricultural Journal, 72(1), 31-34.

Olasoji, O., Olosunde, A. A. & Okoh, J. O. (2013). Physiological quality of cowpea seeds produced in Southwestern Nigeria. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(6), 469–473.

Peksen, A., Peksen, E. & Bozoglu, H. (2004). Relationships among some seed traits, laboratory germination and field emergence in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 36(2), 311-320.

Perl, M., Luria, I. & Gelmond, H. (1978). Biochemical changes in sorghum seeds affected by accelerated aging. Journal of Experimental Botany, 29(2), 497-509.

Ranasingh, N., Pradhan, N., Moaharana, R. L., Biswal, K. A., Mohanty, S., Khamari, B., Malik, L. & Behera, D. (2021). Seed quality and health status of (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) farmer’s saved cowpea seeds collected from different locations of Western Odisha. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 13(2), 737–743.

Rangel, A., Domont, G. B., Pedrosa, C. & Ferreira, S. T. (2003). Functional properties of purified vicilins from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and pea (Pisum sativum) and cowpea protein isolate. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51(19), 5792-5797.

Ranjitha, H. P., Paramesh, R., Shashidhar, H. E., Amruta, N. & Kiran, S. P. (2016). Effect of water regimes on seed quality parameters of rice grown under aerobic and wetland conditions. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8(3), 1546-1550.

Sathya, S. K. K., Vijayan, R., Bastine, D., Francis Palathingala, V. & Moossa, P. P. (2023). Efficacy of botanicals on seed quality enhancement in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) on yield and yield attributes. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci., 35(23), 41-49.

Wirianto, H. A., Budiman, C. & Suhartanto, R. (2024). Uji vigorbenihcabai (Capsicum sp.) denganmetode radicle emergence menggunakananalisiscitra digital. Buletin Agrohorti, 12(1), 142-153.

How to cite this article

Abha Shrivastava, R. Siddaraju, Shantharaja C.S. and T.V. Krishna (2025). Studies on Growth Performance and Evaluation of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Genotypes for Seed Quality. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 17(1): 27-35.